Safety Of CT-P13 Research Articles

Real-world effectiveness and safety of CT-P13, an infliximab biosimilar, for inflammatory bowel diseases: A prospective national observational cohort study (ReFLECT study)

BackgroundReFLECT was a French, prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of the infliximab (IFX) biosimilar CT-P13 in a real-world setting. Here, we describe the results for adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). MethodsEligible patients with IBD were recruited and received intravenous CT-P13 induction and/or maintenance therapy; patients were either naive to IFX (IFX-naive) or previously treated with IFX originator or another IFX biosimilar (IFX-switched). The primary objective was CT-P13 persistence, which was measured as a time-dependent variable during a two-year follow-up period with four prespecified visits. Safety was assessed. ResultsThe adult IBD population comprised 530 patients with Crohn's disease (CD), including 327 categorized as IFX-naive, 188 as IFX-switched, 11 as other (i.e., previously received IFX but received another treatment before switching to CT-P13), and 4 with missing data; and 221 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), including 152 categorized as IFX-naive, 59 as IFX-switched, 8 as other, and 2 with missing data. After two years of follow-up, the rates of CT-P13 persistence were 71.7 % (95 % CI: 66.7, 77.0) and 63.7 % (55.3, 73.3) in patients with CD and UC, respectively. CT-P13 persistence was greater for IFX-switched patients than for IFX-naive patients (CD: 83.7 % [95 % CI: 78.0, 89.9] vs 65.7 % [58.6, 73.7]; UC: 91.2 % [81.7, 100.0] vs 53.4 % [43.0, 66.2]). The main reason for CT-P13 discontinuation was loss of response (CD/UC) in both IFX-naive (14.7 %/21.7 %) and IFX-switched (7.4 %/5.1 %) groups. Among patients (CD and UC, respectively), 51.3 % and 45.2 % reported ≥1 adverse event (AE), and 13.2 % and 12.7 % reported serious AEs, respectively. ConclusionAfter two years of follow-up, the effectiveness of intravenous CT-P13 was maintained in >80 % of IFX-switched patients. CT-P13 induced effective therapeutic maintenance in IFX-naive patients. CT-P13 had an acceptable safety profile. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02925338

A Prospective Observational Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Infliximab-Biosimilar (CT-P13) in Patients With Takayasu Arteritis (TAKASIM).

Objectives: Infliximab (IFX) is widely used in patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis (TAK). Recently, the IFX-biosimilar CT-P13 has been introduced for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of CT-P13 in patients with refractory TAK.Methods: In this prospective, open-label, single-center trial, TAK patients either already on treatment with IFX-originator (switch group) or never treated with IFX (naïve group) received CT-P13 for 52 weeks. The primary outcomes of the study were: (i) number of patients with active disease at month 6; (ii) incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events at month 12. Disease activity was assessed at month 6 and month 12 by clinical evaluation (ITAS-2020, ITAS-ESR, and ITAS-CRP scores) and imaging assessment [magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and (18F)-FDG-PET].Results: 23 patients were recruited (21 switch, 2 naïve). At baseline, 7 patients (32%) were classified as active. At month 6, one patient voluntarily dropped out and 7 patients were still active (30%), including one patient started on a different bDMARD at month 2 due to poor disease control. Mean daily dose of prednisone equivalent was significantly lower than baseline (4.2 ± 1.9 mg vs. 4.8 ± 2.1 mg, p = 0.009). At month 12, another patient was excluded because of pregnancy desire. Five patients were classified as active (24%), including two patients started on a different bDMARD at month 2 and month 6. Mean daily dose of prednisone equivalent was significantly lower than baseline (3.3 ± 2.6, p = 0.034). No patient experienced side effects during CT-P13 infusion. Overall, one patient experienced grade 1 adverse event and 9 patients experienced grade 2 adverse events. In no case hospitalization was required. CT-P13 retention rate was 90.9% at month 6 and 90.4% at month 12.Conclusion: In this study, the use of IFX-biosimilar CT-P13 in patients with refractory TAK showed satisfying efficacy and safety profile.

Long-term efficacy and safety of CT-P10 or rituximab in untreated advanced follicular lymphoma: a randomized phase 3 study

AbstractRituximab biosimilars are a cornerstone of treatment of advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL). This double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial randomized (1:1) adults (≥18 years) with stage III to IV indolent B-cell lymphoma, including grades 1 to 3a FL, to receive CT-P10 or rituximab (375 mg/m2 IV), with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone, every 3 weeks for 8 cycles (induction period). Patients achieving complete response (CR), unconfirmed CR, or partial response (PR) received CT-P10 or rituximab maintenance for 2 years (375 mg/m2, every 8 weeks). Primary end points were previously reported, proving noninferiority of efficacy and pharmacokinetic equivalence of CT-P10 to rituximab. Secondary end points included overall response rate (PR+CR) during the induction period per 2007 International Working Group (IWG) criteria, survival analyses, and overall safety. Between 28 July 2014 and 29 December 2015, 140 patients were randomized (70 per group). Median follow-up was 39.9 months (interquartile range, 36.7-43.5). Per 1999 IWG criteria, 4-year Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% confidence interval [CI]) for CT-P10 and rituximab were 61% (47% to 73%) and 55% (36% to 70%) for progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.67-2.63]; P=.409), respectively, and 88% (77% to 94%) and 93% (83% to 97%) for overall survival (5.29 [0.84-33.53]; P=.077). Overall, 90% (CT-P10) and 86% (rituximab) of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. Long-term safety profiles were similar between groups. Findings confirm favorable outcomes for CT-P10–treated patients with advanced-stage FL and demonstrate comparable long-term efficacy and overall safety between CT-P10 and rituximab. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02162771.

A pharmacokinetic evaluation of the rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

ABSTRACT Introduction CT-P10 is the first biosimilar of rituximab (RTX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The application of valuable biosimilar for the treatment of RA may decrease economic burden of society, and disease activity of RA. Thus, it is worthwhile to identify the economic advantage and further requirement for the proper use of CT-P10 in real world. Areas covered Literature searching was performed to identify suitable references written in English for this review article. Rituximab, biosimilar, CT-P10, and rheumatoid arthritis were used as keywords. Current state of RA treatment, position of RTX in the recommendations for the treatment of RA, current status of RTX biosimilar development were assessed before evaluating CT-P10 itself. Physicochemical property, pharmacokinetic profile through phase I to phase III studies, pharmacodynamics, toxicology data, clinical efficacy, and safety were reviewed Expert opinion As the first biosimilar to originator RTX, CT-P10 may be a useful alternative for the treatment of RA in all indications for originator RTX. In addition, more studies are required to identify long-term effectiveness and safety of CT-P10 in real world. It is also important to find out new indications of CT-P10 and effective mechanisms to lessen nocebo effect against biosimilar including CT-P10.

Efficacy and Safety of CT-P13 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease after Switching from Originator Infliximab: Exploratory Analyses from the NOR-SWITCH Main and Extension Trials.

BackgroundThe NOR-SWITCH main and extension trials demonstrated that switching from originator to biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) is efficacious and safe across six diseases. However, a subgroup analysis of Crohn’s disease (CD) in the main trial displayed a close to significant difference favouring originator infliximab, and more scientific data have therefore been requested. ObjectiveThe aim was to assess treatment efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in an explorative subgroup analysis in CD and ulcerative colitis (UC) in the NOR-SWITCH trials.Patients and MethodsThe 52-week, randomised, non-inferiority, double-blind, multicentre, phase 4 NOR-SWITCH study was followed by a 26-week open extension trial where all patients received treatment with CT-P13. Treatment efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in CD and UC were assessed throughout the 78-week study period.ResultsThe main and extension trials included 155 and 93 patients with CD and 93 and 80 patients with UC, respectively. Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable in both treatment arms within patient groups. There were no differences in the main and extension trials regarding changes in activity indices, C-reactive protein, faecal calprotectin, patient’s and physician’s global assessment of disease activity and patient-reported outcome measures in CD and UC. Moreover, comparable results were also demonstrated for trough serum levels, presence of anti-drug antibodies, and reported adverse events.ConclusionEfficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of both the originator and biosimilar infliximab were comparable in CD and UC in the NOR-SWITCH main and extension trials. These explorative subgroup analyses confirm that there are no significant concerns related to switching from originator infliximab to CT-P13 in CD and UC.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02148640.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-020-00438-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The clinical outcomes of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 (Truxima®) with CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: real-world experience

We evaluated real-world effectiveness and safety of CT-P10 (Truxima®) compared with originator rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treatment. Before and after the introduction of CT-P10 to our institute (November 2017), 221 newly-diagnosed DLBCL patients received rituximab with standard cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone. Patients received originator rituximab throughout (n = 95), switched from originator rituximab to CT-P10 (n = 36), or received CT-P10 throughout (n = 90). There were no significant differences between groups in overall response rate (91.6% vs 94.4% vs 96.7%, respectively; p = 0.403) or complete response rate (84.2% vs 77.8% vs 86.7%, respectively; p = 0.467). Kaplan–Meier survival curves also showed no significant differences in progression-free survival and overall survival between groups (log-rank p = 0.794 and p = 0.955, respectively). Safety profiles were comparable between treatment groups. These data support the ability of CT-P10 to successfully replace originator rituximab in DLBCL treatment and, given the lowered financial barrier, to improve the overall prognosis for DLBCL patients.

P441 Efficacy of biosimilar infliximab CT-P13 among inpatients with severe steroid-refractory colitis

Abstract Background The infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 has been reported to have similar clinical effect compared with its originator. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of CT-P13 in the treatment of inpatients with severe steroid-refractory colitis. Methods Adult colitis patients (UC or isolated Crohn’s colitis; Montreal classification E2-3, or L3, respectively) admitted to the University of Chicago IBD inpatient service between January 2018 and December 2018 for management of severe colitis refractory to IV steroids who received CT-P13 were included in the study. Patients diagnosed with active small bowel Crohn’s disease were excluded. CT-P13 was given as a single or several infusions of 5 to 10 mg/kg. For all patients, demographic, clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic data were attained by a comprehensive review of their electronic medical records. The primary endpoint was colectomy-free survival. Results Twenty-one patients, 14 with ulcerative colitis and seven with Crohn’s colitis, were included. Fourteen (66%) of patients were female. The median age was 32.2 years (IQR 24.1–43.2). The median disease duration was 4.3 years (IQR 2–10.3), and the median follow-up time was 5.9 months (IQR 1.8–9.1). Patients had a median CRP of 23 (IQR 6–74). All patients had moderate to severe disease on flexible sigmoidoscopy. Three patients (14%) underwent colectomy during their index hospitalisation. Colectomy free survival was 76% at three months and 70% at six months (Figure 1). No severe adverse events were reported in this patient cohort. Conclusion A significant proportion of patients with severe colitis failing IV steroids responded to induction therapy with CT-P13. Colectomy free survival rates were similar to previous randomised trials using originator infliximab as induction therapy in severe steroid-refractory colitis. CT-P13 was effective and safe in hospitalised patients with severe steroid-refractory colitis.

Retention Rate and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P13 in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics Registry.

ObjectiveThe aim was to evaluate long-term drug retention, discontinuation, efficacy and safety of CT-P13 and reference infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) enrolled in the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics (KOBIO) registry.MethodsPatients included adults with RA who received CT-P13 or reference infliximab between December 2012 and December 2017. Drug retention, efficacy (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints [DAS28]–erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] or DAS28–C-reactive protein [CRP] and American College of Rheumatology [ACR] core set measure), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed over 4-years’ follow-up.ResultsData from 199 RA patients (CT-P13: n = 147; reference infliximab: n = 52) were analyzed. Median treatment duration was 1.22 years for CT-P13 and 1.40 years for reference infliximab (p = 0.67). Overall, 82% of patients received first-line therapy. Drug retention of CT-P13 versus reference infliximab was comparable for the overall population (p = 0.84) and for first-line (p = 0.66) and subsequent treatment lines (p = 0.96). Treatment changes or discontinuations occurred in 65.2% of patients with CT-P13 and 69.6% with reference infliximab. The most common reason for treatment changes or discontinuing treatment was lack of efficacy (CT-P13: 31.9%; reference infliximab: 34.8%). CT-P13 demonstrated comparable improvements in DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP and ACR responses to reference infliximab. Overall, 19 grade 3 AEs were reported for CT-P13 and eight for reference infliximab.ConclusionLong-term data from patients with RA treated in routine clinical practice in Korea showed that CT-P13 had a comparable drug retention rate to reference infliximab, with similar efficacy and an acceptable safety profile.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT01965132.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-019-00393-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

CT-P13: a review on a biosimilar to infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

ABSTRACT Introduction: CT-P13 was developed as an infliximab biosimilar in 2013. The primary structure of CT-P13 is identical to that of original infliximab and it has highly similar higher order structure, physiochemical characteristics, and biological properties. To date, data from real-life cohorts and randomized controlled trials show comparable clinical efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of biosimilar CT-P13, and the original reference medicinal Product (RMP). Areas covered: This article reviews the comparability of CT-P13 and the RMP and focuses on the emerging clinical trial and observational cohorts data on efficacy and safety of CT-P13 in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The development of a subcutaneous formulation of Infliximab CT-P13 is also addressed. Expert opinion: There is a plethora of evidence to show CT-P13 is non-inferior to infliximab RMP in IBD and that a switch from RMP to this biosimilar is feasible and safe. However, interchangeability and multiple switches can still not be endorsed for introduction into clinical practice.

PF314 REAL WORLD CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF CT-P10 IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA: INTERIM RESULTS FROM A EUROPEAN NON-INTERVENTIONAL POST-AUTHORISATION SAFETY STUDY

Background: In February 2017, CT-P10 became the first biosimilar of rituximab to be approved in Europe for treatment of rheumatic diseases and specific blood cancers including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the commonest type of NHL, representing an estimated 40–58% of cases (Sant et al, 2010). To date, no studies have investigated the effectiveness or safety of CT-P10 in patients with DLBCL in the real world clinical setting. Aims: To evaluate the real world clinical effectiveness and safety of CT-P10 in patients with DLBCL in Europe. Methods: This non-interventional post-authorisation safety study is in progress in five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom [UK]), and involves collection of data from the medical records of consenting adult patients with DLBCL who were treated with CT-P10 as part of their routine clinical care. Effectiveness and safety data are being collected for an observation period of 30 months after the index date (date of CT-P10 initiation) or until death, if sooner. The primary objective is to describe the effectiveness of CT-P10 (overall survival, progression free survival, CT-P10 responses), with secondary objectives to describe the safety profile and CT-P10 treatment pathways. Response to CT-P10 is as documented by the local investigator. Here we report interim results (patients’ baseline characteristics and preliminary response/safety data), based on a data cut on 18 January 2019. Where n is less than the total number of patients, data were missing. Results: The interim analysis includes 151 patients enrolled from sites in the UK and Spain, with a median 8.9 months (interquartile range [IQR] 6.1–12.6) post-index observation at the cut-off. Patients are receiving CT-P10 as a first-line (n = 138, 91%), second-line (n = 9, 6%) or third-line (n = 4, 3%) DLBCL treatment. Ninety-five (63%) patients are male. Other patient characteristics at index: median age 70.9 years (IQR 61.5–76.0) (n = 149); median disease duration 20 days (IQR 10.5–41.0) (n = 147); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (n = 98): 0 (n = 45, 46%), 1 (n = 36, 37%), 2 (n = 11, 11%), 3 (n = 4, 4%) or 4 (n = 2, 2%); Ann Arbor stage (n = 77): I (n = 8, 10%), II (n = 9, 11%), III (n = 18, 21%), IV (n = 40, 48%) or other (n = 2, 2%; recorded as ‘at least stage II’). Best responses to CT-P10 (evaluable in n = 128) are shown in Fig. 1. Safety of CT-P10 was evaluable in 128 patients, of whom 118 (92%) experienced adverse events (AEs) during the observation period (732 AEs recorded in total, including infusion-related reactions), 77 (60%) had AEs of grade 3 and above and 11 (9%) discontinued CT-P10 due to AEs.Summary/Conclusion: Early results from this ongoing study suggest that a high proportion of patients with DLBCL treated with CT-P10 in the real world achieve complete or partial responses, similar to the response rates reported previously for reference rituximab (Horvat et al, 2017). Continued recruitment and extended follow-up will enable more comprehensive analyses of CT-P10 effectiveness and safety.

Efficacy and Safety of CT-P13 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease after Switching from Originator Infliximab: Exploratory Analyses from the NOR-SWITCH Main and Extension Trials

Background: TNF-alpha inhibitors have improved treatment of chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. The NOR-SWITCH main and extension trial addressed switching from infliximab originator (IFX) to CT-P13 across six diseases. Here we present the exploratory post-hoc analyses in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: The 52-week, randomized, non-inferiority, double blind, multicenter, phase 4 NOR-SWITCH study was followed by a 26-week open extension trial where all patients received treatment with CT-P13. Treatment efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were assessed throughout the 78-week study period. The primary endpoint was disease worsening. Findings: The main and extension trials included 155 and 93 patients with CD and 93 and 80 patients with UC, respectively. The baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment arms in both diseases. Disease worsening in the main trial occurred in 14 (21%) of CD patients in the IFX group and 23 (37%) in the CT-P13 group (risk difference -14⋅3%, CI -29⋅3 to 0⋅7). In the extension study, disease worsening occurred in 13 (21%) patients in the CT-P13 maintenance group and 8 (13%) in the IFX/CT-P13 switch group (risk difference 7⋅9%, CI -5⋅2 to 21). The corresponding results in UC were 3 (9%) and 5 (12%) patients (risk difference -2⋅6%, CI -15⋅2 to 10⋅0) in the main trial, and 6 (15%) and 1 (3%) patients (risk difference 12⋅4%, CI -0⋅1 to 25⋅0) in the extension trial. In both diseases, the treatment groups were similar across disease activity measures, drug levels and immunogenicity. Interpretation: The subgroup analyses of IBD in the NOR-SWITCH main and extension trials support switching from originator infliximab to CT-P13 for non-medical reasons. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT-02148640, EudraCT Number: 2014-002056-40. Funding Statement: This work was supported by the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. Declaration of Interests: KKJ reports personal fees from Intercept, Norgine and Celltrion. GLG reports personal fees from AbbVie, Biogen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Orion Pharma, Celltrion and Boehringer Ingelheim. NB reports personal fees received from Orion Pharma, Roche, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Takeda. ICO reports grants from Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from Pfizer. EAH reports grants from AbbVie, Pfizer, UCB, Roche, and MSD. IPB reports personal fees from AbbVie, MSD, Takeda, Hospira, and Ferring. KEAL reports grants from MSD, personal fees from Takeda, Orion, Abbvie, Pfizer, and MSD. JJ reports personal fees from MSD, AbbVie, Celltrion, Orion Pharma, Takeda, Napp Pharm, AstroPharma, Hikma and Pfizer. TKK reports reports grants from Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services during the conduct of the study and personal fees from AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Epirus, Janssen, Merck-Serono, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Oktal, Orion Pharma, Hospira/Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and UCB Pharma. SOF reports personal fees from Takeda, Pharmacosmos, Tillotts, Janssen, Intercept and Pfizer. Ethics Approval Statement: The study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. The study protocol and consent documents were approved by an independent ethics committee (Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics South East; reference number 2014/848), by appropriate institutional review boards and by the Norwegian Medicines Agency (reference number 14/07192-11).

Similar Efficacy and Safety of CT-P10 and Reference Rituximab in Patients with Advanced Stage Follicular Lymphoma: Updated Phase III Study Results

Background: CT-P10 is an approved biosimilar to the innovator rituximab (RTX) from many countries including European Union based in part on the pharmacokinetics (PK) equivalence and comparable efficacy in patients with previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) when treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) as an induction therapy (Coiffier B et al. ASH 2016; Kim WS et al. ASCO 2017).Objective: We report here the updated efficacy outcomes including progression free survival (PFS), duration of response, overall survival (OS), as well as updated safety profile of CT-P10 compared to RTX in advanced FL patients with median follow-up duration of 23 months including the Maintenance Period with rituximab monotherapy.Methods: These results were derived from an ongoing randomized and double-blind study in patients with previously untreated advanced FL (NCT02162771). A total of 140 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio and 124 patients completed 8 cycles of R-CVP induction therapy. One-hundred twenty two patients (62 patients in CT-P10 group and 60 patients in RTX group), who showed response during the Induction Period, entered the Maintenance Period where a total of 12 cycles of rituximab monotherapy was to be administered every 2 months. The study was planned to continue until death or up to 3 years from the randomized date of the last patient. Kaplan Meier (KM) method was used to estimate PFS, duration of response, and OS.Results: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics; overall median age of 58 years, 55% female, 57% with FLIPI score ≥3, 100% with Stage III/IV, 18% with bulky disease (≥7cm) and 26% with B-Symptom.As of the cut-off date for investigator-assessed PFS, duration of response and OS, median follow-up was 23 months (range, 0.5-34) in the CT-P10 group and 22 months (range, 0.2-33) in the RTX group. The proportion of patients who had experienced relapse, disease progression or death from any cause was 22.9% (16/70) and 24.3% (17/70) for the CT-P10 and RTX groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between CT-P10 and RTX groups in PFS (log rank, p-value: 0.806) with 2-year PFS of 75.2% and 73.5%, respectively (Figure 1). In terms of sustained response, the proportions of patient who showed relapse or disease progression after achieving overall response (Complete Response, unconfirmed Complete Response, or Partial Response) were 19.4% (13/67) in CT-P10 group and 21.3% (13/61) in RTX group, and the KM curves showed no statistically significant difference between CT-P10 and RTX (log rank, p-value: 0.997) (Figure 2). Death from any cause were 5.7% (4/70) and 2.9% (2/70) in the CT-P10 and RTX groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in OS (log rank, p-value: 0.464) between the CT-P10 and RTX groups with 2-year OS of 93.2% and 95.3%, respectively.Overall safety profile of CT-P10 was consistent with that of RTX (Table 1). A similar number of patients in each treatment group experienced at least 1 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) considered to be related to the study drug, infusion-related reaction, and infection. The proportion of patients with positive anti-drug antibody was also similar in both groups (4.3% [3/70] vs 5.7% [4/70] in the CT-P10 and RTX groups). Neither progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy nor Hepatitis B virus reactivation was reported in either group.Conclusion: At the median follow-up duration of 23 months, the updated efficacy data in advanced FL patients demonstrated comparable PFS, sustained response and OS between CT-P10 and RTX. CT-P10 was also well tolerated and its safety profile was similar to that of RTX. The updated safety results did not reveal any trends or new signals noted in the patients treated with CT-P10. [Display omitted] DisclosuresKim:Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Buske:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ogura:MeijiSeika Pharma: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundi Pharma: Consultancy; SymBio: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Cellgene: Honoraria. Coiffier:CELGENE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MUNDIPHARMA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELLTRION: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MORPHOSYS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NOVARTIS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Celltrion, Inc: Employment. Kim:Celltrion, Inc: Employment.

815 - Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of CT-P13 after Switching from Originator Infliximab: Exploratory Subgroup Analyses in IBD in the Nor-Switch Extension Trial

815 - Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of CT-P13 after Switching from Originator Infliximab: Exploratory Subgroup Analyses in IBD in the Nor-Switch Extension Trial

A review on biosimilar infliximab, CT-P13, in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

The introduction of biological agents has led to significant changes in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The relatively high price of infliximab (IFX) and the expiration of the patents led to the introduction of biosimilar agents. CT-P13 was the first IFX biosimilar approved in the same indications as the reference product; however, the approval was based on randomized clinical trials conducted in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. In the past 2-3years, new findings from prospective observational studies supported the short-, medium- and long-term clinical efficacy and safety of CT-P13 in patients with IBD. This review summarized the clinical use and efficacy of the first biosimilar IFX, CT-P13, in the treatment of IBD.

Long-term Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Biosimilar Infliximab After One Year in a Prospective Nationwide Cohort.

It has been previously shown that biosimilar infliximab CT-P13 is effective and safe in inducing remission in inflammatory bowel diseases. We report here the 1-year outcomes from a prospective nationwide inflammatory bowel disease cohort. A prospective, nationwide, multicenter, observational cohort was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of CT-P13 in the induction and maintenance treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Demographic data were collected and a harmonized monitoring strategy was applied. Clinical remission, response, and biochemical response were evaluated at weeks 14, 30, and 54, respectively. Safety data were registered. Three hundred fifty-three consecutive inflammatory bowel disease (209 CD and 144 UC) patients were included, of which 229 patients reached the week 54 endpoint at final evaluation. Age at disease onset: 24/28 years (median, interquartile range: 19-34/22-39) in patients with CD/UC. Forty-nine, 53, 48% and 86, 81 and 65% of patients with CD reached clinical remission and response by weeks 14, 30, and 54, respectively. Clinical remission and response rates were 56, 41, 43% and 74, 66, 50% in patients with UC. Clinical efficacy was influenced by previous anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) exposure in patients with a drug holiday beyond 1 year. The mean C-reactive protein level decreased significantly in both CD and UC by week 14 and was maintained throughout the 1-year follow-up (both UC/CD: P < 0.001). Thirty-one (8.8%) patients had infusion reactions and 32 (9%) patients had infections. Antidrug antibody positivity rates were significantly higher throughout patients with previous anti-TNF exposure; concomitant azathioprine prevented antidrug antibody formation in anti-TNF-naive patients with CD. Results from this prospective nationwide cohort confirm that CT-P13 is effective and safe in inducing and maintaining long-term remission in both CD and UC. Efficacy was influenced by previous anti-TNF exposure; no new safety signals were detected.

Erratum to: Effectiveness and Safety of CT-P13 (Biosimilar Infliximab) in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Real Life at 6 Months.

CT-P13 is a biosimilar of Remicade®, an agent approved in some countries for use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of CT-P13 in rheumatic diseases, but not in IBD. To assess the effectiveness and safety of CT-P13 in IBD patients in real clinical practice. This is a prospective observational study in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis treated with CT-P13. The study was performed in one single center. Patients included were naive or switched to anti-TNF treatment from the reference infliximab (Remicade®) to CT-P13. Efficacy and safety were assessed in naive and switched patients who were in remission at the time of the switch at months 3 and 6 of therapy. 87.5 and 83.9% of switched CD patients who were in remission at the time of the switch continued in remission, and 66.7 and 50% of naive CD patients reached remission, at months 3 and 6. In UC switched cases, 92 and 91.3% of patients in remission at the time of the switch continued in remission, at 3 and 6 months. In naive UC patients, the remission rates were 44.4 and 66.7%, at months 3 and 6. Adverse events occurred in 7.5% of patients during 6 months of study. CT-P13 was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with CD or UC.

Sa1929 - Effectiveness and Safety of CT-P13 Under Routine Care in Pediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Sa1929 - Effectiveness and Safety of CT-P13 Under Routine Care in Pediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Effectiveness and Safety of CT-P13 (Biosimilar Infliximab) in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Real Life at 6\xa0Months

BackgroundCT-P13 is a biosimilar of Remicade®, an agent approved in some countries for use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of CT-P13 in rheumatic diseases, but not in IBD.AimsTo assess the effectiveness and safety of CT-P13 in IBD patients in real clinical practice.MethodsThis is a prospective observational study in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis treated with CT-P13. The study was performed in one single center. Patients included were naive or switched to anti-TNF treatment from the reference infliximab (Remicade®) to CT-P13. Efficacy and safety were assessed in naive and switched patients who were in remission at the time of the switch at months 3 and 6 of therapy.Results87.5 and 83.9% of switched CD patients who were in remission at the time of the switch continued in remission, and 66.7 and 50% of naive CD patients reached remission, at months 3 and 6. In UC switched cases, 92 and 91.3% of patients in remission at the time of the switch continued in remission, at 3 and 6 months. In naive UC patients, the remission rates were 44.4 and 66.7%, at months 3 and 6. Adverse events occurred in 7.5% of patients during 6 months of study.ConclusionsCT-P13 was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with CD or UC.

The PROSIT-BIO Cohort: A Prospective Observational Study of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated with Infliximab Biosimilar.

Few data are available on the safety and efficacy of infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. A prospective, multicenter, cohort study using a structured database. Consecutive patients (313 Crohn's disease and 234 ulcerative colitis) were enrolled from 31 referral centers; 311 patients were naive to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha, 139 had a previous exposure to biologics, and the remaining 97 were switched to CT-P13 after a mean of 18 ± 14 infusions of infliximab. The mean follow-up was 4.3 ± 2.8 months, and the total follow-up time was 195 patient-years. After 2061 infusions, 66 serious adverse events were reported (12.1%), 38 (6.9%) of them were infusion-related reactions. The biosimilar had to be stopped in 29 (5.3%) cases for severe infusion reactions (8 naive, 19 previous exposed, and 2 switch), and in further 16 patients (2.9%) for other serious adverse events. Infusion reactions were significantly more frequent in patients pre-exposed to infliximab than to other anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (incidence rate ratio = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.05-7.9). The efficacy of the biosimilar was evaluated in 434 patients who received treatment for at least 8 weeks, using time-to-event methods for censored observations: 35 patients were primary failures (8.1%). After further 8, 16, and 24 weeks, the efficacy estimations were 95.7%, 86.4%, and 73.7% for naive, 97.2%, 85.2%, and 62.2% for pre-exposed, and 94.5%, 90.8%, and 78.9% for switch, respectively (log-rank P = 0.64). Although no direct comparison was performed, preliminary data on efficacy and safety of CT-P13 were in line with those of infliximab.

P487 Effectiveness and safety of CT-P13 under routine care in paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease

P487 Effectiveness and safety of CT-P13 under routine care in paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease