Safety In Clinical Trials Research Articles

Do non-prescription products help in managing androgenic alopecia?

Background: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss. Currently approved medications for AGA are topical minoxidil and oral finasteride, both of which are prescription medications which may cause side effects. Non-prescription products such as herbal extracts and over-the-counter medications have limited evidence regarding safety and efficacy; however, they may be an alternative for patients unable or unwilling to use prescription medication. Summary: This article reviews investigator-blinded, controlled clinical trials assessing the efficacy of non-prescription monotherapies in treating AGA. A total of 13 studies were included using procyanidin, cetirizine, caffeine, Oryza sativa bran, pumpkin seed oil, rosemary oil, saw palmetto and watercress. The available data demonstrate considerable improvements in one or more parameters: total hair density, terminal hair density and hair diameter. Procyanidin and cetirizine were investigated in more investigator-blinded, randomized controlled trials than other agents. Minimal adverse events were observed; however, more robust clinical trial and long-term safety and efficacy data are warranted. Key Message: Additional investigations through the conduct of high quality randomized, controlled trials with larger numbers of patients will help determine the effectiveness and safety of this class of compounds, either as monotherapy or as an addition to current pharmacological interventions.

Telehealth in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE: To describe patient, research staff, and clinician perspectives regarding the effects of telehealth and remote clinical trial operations on safety, quality, and experience in gynecologic oncology clinical trials. METHODS: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews conducted from May to June 2022 with purposively sampled clinical trial participants, research staff, and clinicians involved in gynecologic oncology clinical trials with telehealth utilization. Participants described telehealth in clinical trial experiences, including benefits and barriers to receipt and provision of care, satisfaction, and quality. Transcripts were coded and analyzed with a modified content analysis approach based on research objectives and emergent themes. An adapted version of the validated Telehealth Usability Questionnaire was administered to all invited participants. RESULTS: Five patients, seven clinicians, and five research staff were interviewed. Patients and clinicians reported that telehealth, remote testing, and medication delivery positively affected quality of life by reducing financial burden, wait times, and transportation needs. Interviewees did not report telehealth-related changes in treatment-related adverse effects, referrals for urgent evaluation, or compromise of privacy but expressed concerns about the lack of physical examinations. Patients reported that telehealth increased scheduling burden without negative effects on care quality, counseling comprehension, relationships with trial teams, or satisfaction. Clinicians and research staff reported improved workflows regarding remote consent, sponsor interactions, and documentation but challenges with virtual patient education and off-site testing. Clinicians highlighted disparities for patients with limited technology access and reported institutional and insurance-based telehealth policies as barriers. Survey responses supported qualitative findings. CONCLUSION: Despite notable limitations, patients, research staff, and clinicians recommended continued utilization of telehealth and remote clinical trial operations in clinical trials. Future clinical trial designs should consider telehealth inclusion.

Dupilumab Demonstrates a Higher Likelihood of Achieving Improvements in Signs, Symptoms, and Quality of Life vs. Tralokinumab at Week 16: Results from a Bucher Indirect Treatment Comparison

Background: Dupilumab and tralokinumab are biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), aged ≥6 months and ≥12 years, respectively. Dupilumab and tralokinumab have demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical trials. However, no direct head-to-head trials have been performed to compare the efficacy of dupilumab vs tralokinumab. The Bucher indirect treatment comparison (ITC) is a robust, placebo-adjusted, and accepted method to evaluate the relative efficacy of drugs in the absence of direct comparisons. The objective of this analysis was to report results from a Bucher ITC comparing the efficacy of dupilumab+topical corticosteroid (TCS) vs tralokinumab+TCS at Week 16. Methods: The placebo-adjusted Bucher ITC included published data from the two similarly designed phase 3 trials, LIBERTY AD CHRONOS (NCT02260986) and ECZTRA 3 (NCT03363854). For both studies, data from the 16-week period were used, employing non-responder imputation, with the following doses: 300mg dupilumab every 2 weeks (q2w)+TCS or placebo+TCS, and 300mg tralokinumab q2w+TCS or placebo+TCS. The evaluated endpoints included the proportions of patients achieving an Investigator’s Global Assessment score 0/1 (IGA 0/1; clear/almost clear), 75% and 90% improvements from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75 and EASI-90), ≥4-point improvement from baseline in the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score (PP-NRS >4), and ≥4-point improvement from baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI >4). The Bucher ITC with the frequentist approach was performed using R software (v 4.20; netmeta package) with a fixed-effect model. Results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 801 patients (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS: placebo+TCS: 315; dupilumab+TCS: 106; ECZTRA 3: placebo+TCS: 127; tralokinumab+TCS: 253) were included in the Bucher ITC. Baseline disease characteristics indicated comparable severity between the two trial populations based on IGA and PP-NRS. However, CHRONOS showed slightly higher baseline EASI scores (median [Q1, Q3] score 30.9 [22.3, 41.6] vs. ECZTRA 3: 24.7 [18.4, 35.9]), while ECZTRA 3 showed slightly higher DLQI scores (median [Q1, Q3] score 18.0 [12.0, 23.0] vs. CHRONOS: 13.5 [8.0, 20.0]). Patients treated with dupilumab+TCS had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving IGA 0/1 (OR=2.49, 95%CI 1.24–5.00), EASI-75 (OR=3.21, 95%CI 1.66–6.19), EASI-90 (OR=2.92, 95%CI 1.41–6.02), PP-NRS ≥4 (OR=3.62, 95%CI 1.87–7.00), and DLQI ≥4 (OR=2.16, 95%CI 1.03–4.54) at Week 16 vs those treated with tralokinumab+TCS. Conclusions: A placebo-adjusted Bucher ITC showed that the likelihood of achieving improvements in signs, symptom, and quality of life is significantly higher for patients treated with dupilumab+TCS vs tralokinumab+TCS at Week 16.

Ophthalmic Formulations for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis and Their Effect on the Ocular Surface: A Review of Safety and Tolerability Assessments in Clinical Trials.

Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is the most common allergic eye disorder. Antiallergic eyedrops are the first line of pharmacological treatment. However, the application of antiallergic eyedrops can potentially alter tear homeostasis and affect the ocular surface, which may result in iatrogenic diseases such as dye eye disease (DED). Long-term treatment of AC with eyedrops containing preservatives and other components may increase the risk of DED and ocular surface damage. Here, we examined 20 clinical trials published during the past ten years with antihistamine ophthalmic formulations in the treatment of AC, to evaluate the extent of evidence about their safety and tolerability. Remarkably, we find that most trials lack an evaluation of the critical ocular surface parameters, such as tear film break-up time, tear volume, corneal and conjunctival damage, and inflammation, to properly assess the state of the ocular surface state after prolonged treatment. There is a need to increase awareness of the use of specific formulations that do not increase the risk of iatrogenic DED.

TMET-30. ONCOLYTIC HSV REWIRES METABOLISM TO PROMOTE ANTITUMOR IMMUNITY THROUGH REDUCTIVE CARBOXYLATION AND FERROPTOSIS

Abstract Cancer cells autonomously rewire metabolism to meet increased bioenergetic demands. Oncolytic HSVs (oHSVs) are attenuated Herpes simplex type 1 derived viruses that lyse tumor cells releasing damage-associated molecules triggering antitumor immunity. Currently one oHSV-1 derived virus is approved for melanoma treatment in the USA and another for recurrent GBM in Japan. While several other viruses are being evaluated in clinical trials for safety and efficacy, an understanding of the impact of oHSV therapy on cancer cell metabolism is largely unexplored. A detailed understanding of how oHSV impact tumor cell metabolism and oxidative stress is important to understand the unique susceptibilities that can further be exploited to improve the therapeutic index. Here, we analyzed transcriptomic changes in tumor biopsies of recurrent high-grade glioma patients treated with oHSV. RNA-seq data obtained from pre- and post-G207 treated biopsies from phase-Ib study patients (NCT00028158) revealed enrichment in pathways related to citric acid cycle, oxidative phosphorylation, and glutamate metabolism. We confirmed these changes by RNA sequencing of oHSV-infected patient derived GBM cells. Mechanistically, oHSV hijacked cellular glucose metabolism to increase oxidative phosphorylation and modulated cellular glutamine metabolism towards reductive carboxylation and reduced free glutathione, collectively contributing to increased ROS generation. Kinome profiling revealed PKC activation upon treatment with oHSV. Increased ROS combined with reduced glutathione, and PKC activation promoted ferroptotic cell death characterized by increased lipid peroxidation and smaller, ruptured mitochondria, and contributed to immunotherapy by this treatment. IDH mutant tumors that block reductive carboxylation were resistant to oHSV-induced ferroptotic cell death and did not benefit from oHSV-induced antitumor benefit. Together, this study presents avenues to enhance antitumor immunity by oHSV therapy.

Pharmacology, Signaling and Therapeutic Potential of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Negative Allosteric Modulators.

Metabotropic glutamate receptors are a family of eight class C G protein-coupled receptors regulating higher order brain functions including cognition and motion. Metabotropic glutamate receptors have thus been heavily investigated as potential drug targets for treating neurological disorders. Drug discovery efforts directed toward metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGlu5) have been particularly fruitful, with a wealth of drug candidates and pharmacological tools identified. mGlu5 negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) are promising novel therapeutics for developmental, neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's Disease, Huntington's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, autism spectrum disorders, substance use disorders, stroke, anxiety and depression) and show promise in ameliorating adverse effects induced by other medications (e.g., L-dopa induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease). However, despite preclinical success, mGlu5 NAMs are yet to reach the market due to poor safety and efficacy profiles in clinical trials. Herein, we review the physiology and signal transduction of mGlu5. We provide a comprehensive critique of therapeutic options with respect to mGlu5 inhibitors, spanning from orthosteric antagonists to NAMs. Finally, we address the challenges associated with drug development and highlight future directions to guide rational drug discovery of safe and effective novel therapeutics.

New promising antiseptics for individual antiviral protection against seasonal infections including COVID-19

Seasonal viral infections of the upper respiratory tract are widespread throughout the world. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has revealed the importance of timely personalized prevention of acute viral diseases and related bacterial complications. One of the main directions in the preventing viral infections relies on the development of effective antiseptics to inactivate viruses on the hands and mucous membranes. To effectively destroy SARS-CoV-2, the WHO recommends two antiseptics: a 70% ethanol solution and sodium hypochlorite. The proposed antiseptics are outdated and have an irritating effect on the skin and mucous membranes. In connection with this, a promising research direction includes development of new antiseptics with selective toxicity, low volatility, low coefficients in the oil-water system, weak lipophilic properties, low absorption into the vacuolar skin structures and low content of toxic impurities. One of these antiseptics is anavidin. The development and selection of molecules has been carried out, the next planned stage will be assessment of the effectiveness and safety of new molecules, including preclinical and early phase clinical trials, also analyzing prevention of viral infections, e.g. COVID-19.

Ensuring safety and monitoring adverse events in clinical trials: Challenges and innovations

Safety and adverse events (AEs) monitoring in clinical trials are critical to ensuring participant safety and the successful development of new therapies. Effective monitoring not only protects patients but also helps identify any risks associated with the investigational product. This paper elaborates on the methodologies used to detect, categorize, and report adverse events during clinical trials, and how these processes are governed by stringent regulatory frameworks. Additionally, the discussion highlights the role of pharmacovigilance systems, the ethical obligations researchers face in AE reporting, and the technological innovations that are transforming safety monitoring. Challenges, including under-reporting, data variability, and interpretation difficulties, are examined in depth. Ultimately, advancements in real-time data collection, adaptive trial designs, and artificial intelligence (AI) are promising to improve the accuracy and timeliness of adverse event monitoring, shaping the future of clinical research and patient safety.

Combined Phase 1/2a Initial Clinical Safety Trials and Proof-of-Concept Assessment of a Novel Antimicrobial Peptide KSL-W Anti-Plaque Chewing Gum.

The effective control of dental plaque is crucial for oral health, given that pathogenic bacteria in plaque are the primary cause of dental caries. Current antimicrobial agents, although effective, disrupt the oral microbiome and lead to oral dysbiosis, hindering efforts to curb dental caries. Novel antimicrobial peptides offer a promising solution due to their selective bactericidal activity against cariogenic bacteria. This study explores the initial safety and efficacy of KSL-W formulated into chewing gum through a Phase 1 and 2a clinical trial. The combined trial, approved by the FDA, follows a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design. Phase 1 assessed safety with single doses (2-100 mg), whereas Phase 2a explored both safety and proof of concept in reducing oral bacteria with multiple doses (4-75 mg). Besides adverse events (Phase 1), outcome measures included whole-mouth plaque and gingival index scores and bleeding on probing (Phase 2a). KSL-W demonstrated safety in both phases, with no severe adverse events. The proof-of-concept analysis revealed a decrease in plaque and gingival inflammation, particularly at doses ≥ 20 mg. The 30 mg dose appeared to yield optimal effects without any adverse reactions in subjects. Results from this study indicate that KSL-W is safe for use in humans and provides initial evidence of its potential efficacy in reducing plaque and gingival inflammation. Further research is essential to determine optimal usage and ultimate safety, and to assess its potential in diverse populations. The trial is registered with the FDA (Trial Registration Number: NCT01877421). The clinical trials were registered in the clinicaltrials.gov database under the title "Safety and Tolerability of Antiplaque Chewing Gum in a Gingivitis Population" and the identifier number is NCT01877421. The URL for accessing the study in clinicaltrials.gov is https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01877421?intr=Antiplaque%20chewing&rank=1.

Early Prediction and Impact Assessment of CYP3A4-Related Drug-Drug Interactions for Small-Molecule Anticancer Drugs Using Human-CYP3A4-Transgenic Mouse Models.

Early detection of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can facilitate timely drug development decisions, prevent unnecessary restrictions on patient enrollment, resulting in clinical study populations that are not representative of the indicated study population, and allow for appropriate dose adjustments to ensure safety in clinical trials. All of these factors contribute to a streamlined drug approval process and enhanced patient safety. Here we describe a new approach for early prediction of the magnitude of change in exposure for cytochrome P450 (P450) CYP3A4-related DDIs of small-molecule anticancer drugs based on the model-based extrapolation of human-CYP3A4-transgenic mice pharmacokinetics to humans. Victim drugs brigatinib and lorlatinib were evaluated with the new approach in combination with the perpetrator drugs itraconazole and rifampicin. Predictions of the magnitude of change in exposure deviated at most 0.99- to 1.31-fold from clinical trial results for inhibition with itraconazole, whereas exposure predictions for the induction with rifampicin were less accurate, with deviations of 0.22- to 0.48-fold. Results for the early prediction of DDIs and their clinical impact appear promising for CYP3A4 inhibition, but validation with more victim and perpetrator drugs is essential to evaluate the performance of the new method. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The described method offers an alternative for the early detection and assessment of potential clinical impact of CYP3A4-related drug-drug interactions. The model was able to adequately describe the inhibition of CYP3A4 metabolism and the subsequent magnitude of change in exposure. However, it was unable to accurately predict the magnitude of change in exposure of victim drugs in combination with an inducer.

History, Hype, and Responsible Psychedelic Medicine: A Qualitative Study of Psychedelic Researchers.

Background Psychedelic medicine is a rapidly growing area of research and policy change. Australia recently became the first country to legalize the prescription of psychedelics and serves as a case study of issues that may emerge in other jurisdictions. Despite their influence as a stakeholder group, there has been little empirical exploration of psychedelic researchers' views on the development of psychedelic research and the ethical concerns. Methods We thematically analysed fourteen interviews with Australian psychedelic researchers. Results Three themes were constructed from the data: 1) coming out of the shadow of the 1960s, 2) challenges and affordances in engaging stakeholders, and 3) growing pains in innovation and translation. Conclusion The results illustrated tensions arising from the rapid growth of psychedelic research from a small group of dedicated individuals with a similar worldview, to a multi-interest, regulated industry. Participants' experiences and viewpoints were influenced by the history of psychedelic research, and this was met with an overarching concern for protecting the field from premature discontinuation, as well as maximizing potential positive impacts. Targets for stakeholder collaboration and initiatives to support responsible innovation in psychedelics include equitable access, sustainable industry involvement, productive research agendas, responsible reporting of evidence, and risk-taking within the relative safety of clinical trials.

Phase III randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety of amlodipine and candesartan cilexetil combination for hypertension treatment

Effective antihypertensive therapy is essential for achieving optimal blood pressure (BP) control and reducing cardiovascular events. This double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial aimed to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of a combination of amlodipine (AML) and candesartan cilexetil (CC) versus AML monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension (HTN). After a 4-week run-in period with AML 5 mg, patients whose HTN remained uncontrolled (diastolic BP [DBP]) ≥ 90 mmHg and < 120 mmHg) were randomized to receive either AML + CC or AML alone for 8 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in DBP and systolic BP (SBP). The primary safety measure was the incidence of adverse events (AEs). A total of 174 participants were included in the efficacy analysis. After 8 weeks, DBP decreased by -9.92 ± 0.86 mmHg in the AML + CC arm and - 2.08 ± 0.86 mmHg in the AML arm (p < 0.0001). SBP decreased by -14.27 ± 1.39 mmHg in the AML + CC arm versus - 2.77 ± 1.39 mmHg in the AML arm (p < 0.0001). AEs occurred in 11.24% of the AML + CC group and 5.62% of the AML group (p = 0.1773). AML + CC combination therapy demonstrated superior efficacy with good tolerance, making it a promising option for patients with inadequately controlled hypertension on amlodipine alone.

Challenges and opportunities of phage therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae infections.

Traditional antibiotics have been effective in many cases. However, the rise in multidrug-resistant bacteria has diminished their therapeutic efficacy, signaling the dawn of an era beyond antibiotics. The challenge of multidrug resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae is particularly critical, with increasing global mortality and resistance rates. Therefore, the development of alternative therapies to antibiotics is urgently needed. Phages, which are natural predators of bacteria, have inherent advantages. However, comprehensive information on K. pneumoniae phages is lacking in current literature. This review aims to analyze and summarize relevant studies, focusing on the present state of phage therapy for K. pneumoniae infections. This includes an examination of treatment methodologies, associated challenges, strategies, new phage technologies, clinical trial safety and efficacy, regulatory issues, and future directions for phage therapy development. Enhancing phage technology is crucial for addressing the evolving threat of multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae.

Efficacy and safety in early-phase clinical trials for refractory colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

BackgroundDespite recent metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) therapeutic innovations a comprehensive synthesis of patient outcome and risk-benefit assessment of phase 1/2 trials is missing. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess efficacy, safety, and trends over time for phase 1 and 2 mCRC trials by examining clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall response rate (ORR), grade 3 or higher adverse events (AE), and discontinuation due to AE. MethodsThe PRISMA guidelines were followed. We searched PubMed and Embase for publications of phase 1/2 trials between 2010–2021. Trials reporting on new therapies for treatment-refractory mCRC were included. ResultsThe search strategy yielded 4175 unique reports, of which 258 publications were eligible. These publications report data of 277 unique treatment arms. Overall ORR was 6 %, CBR was 27 % in phase 1 and 36 % in phase 2 trials. CBR increased from 23 % in 2010–2012 to 42 % in 2019–2021. Compared to 2010–2012, trials in 2019–2021 more often tested immunomodulators (4 % vs 23 %), included molecularly preselected populations (4 % vs 38 %) and younger patients (median age<60 44 % vs 66 %). Grade 3 + AE occurred in 35 % of patients, most frequently in trials investigating targeted treatments. ConclusionsTreatment efficacy in phase 1/2 trials is modest but improved from 2010 to 2021. This improvement is accompanied by a shift towards testing in a younger, fitter, and more strictly molecularly preselected population, as well as an increased focus on targeted and immunotherapies.

Elucidating the Significance of Zonulin in the Pathogenesis of Chronic Inflammatory Disorders: Emphasis on Intestinal Barrier Function and Tight Junction Regulation.

The intestinal barrier, a critical component of the body's defense system, plays a vital role in maintaining homeostasis by preventing the translocation of harmful substances from the gut lumen into the bloodstream. Disruptions in this barrier, often characterized by increased intestinal permeability, are increasingly recognized as contributors to the development and progression of various Chronic Inflammatory Disorders (CIDs). Zonulin, a key regulator of intestinal Tight Junctions (TJs), has emerged as a pivotal player in this process. Dysregulation of zonulin, leading to increased intestinal permeability, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a wide range of CIDs, including Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), celiac disease, and Multiple Sclerosis (MS). This review examines the intricate relationship between zonulin and intestinal permeability, emphasizing its role in regulating TJ integrity and its association with various CIDs. Recent research has demonstrated the therapeutic potential of targeting zonulin, specifically through the use of larazotide acetate, a zonulin antagonist. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown promising results in improving gut barrier integrity and reducing inflammation in patients with CIDs. These findings underscore the significance of zonulin as a potential biomarker for intestinal barrier function and a promising therapeutic target for managing CIDs. Further research is needed to elucidate the precise mechanisms of action of zonulin antagonists and evaluate their efficacy and safety in clinical trials. A deeper understanding of the complex interplay among zonulin, intestinal permeability, and CIDs is crucial, paving the way for novel therapeutic strategies and personalized approaches to patient care.

Recent Advances in Therapeutics and Manufacturing Processes of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus for the Treatment of Lung Diseases.

Developing delivery vectors capable of transducing genetic material across the lung epithelia and mucus barrier is a major challenge and of great interest to enable gene therapies to treat pulmonary diseases. Recombinant Adeno-associated Viruses (rAAVs) have emerged as attractive candidates among viral and non-viral vectors due to their broad tissue tropism, ability to transduce dividing and quiescent cells, and their safety profile in current human applications. While rAAVs have demonstrated safety in earlier clinical trials for lung disease applications, there are still some limitations regarding rAAV-transgene delivery in pulmonary cells. Thus, further improvements in rAAV engineering are needed to enhance the effectiveness of rAAV-based therapies for lung diseases. Such therapies could benefit patients with chronic lung diseases, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, and cystic fibrosis, among others, by regulating hereditary gene mutations or acquired gene deregulations causing these conditions. Alongside therapeutic development, advances in the rAAV production process are essential to meet increasing production demands, while reducing manufacturing costs. This review discusses current challenges and recent advances in the field of rAAV engineering and manufacturing to encourage the clinical development of new pulmonary gene therapy treatments.

1514P A prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded, feasibility clinical trial for efficacy and safety of a non-tissue destructive compact focused ultrasound system with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

1514P A prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded, feasibility clinical trial for efficacy and safety of a non-tissue destructive compact focused ultrasound system with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

Estimand Framework and Statistical Considerations for Integrated Analysis of Clinical Trial Safety Data.

Safety analyses play a pivotal role in drug development, ensuring the protection of patients while advancing innovative pharmaceuticals to market. A single study generally does not have sufficient sample size to evaluate all important safety events with reasonable precision and may not cover the full target population for the investigational treatment. Integrated analyses (pooled or meta-analysis) over several studies may be helpful in that regard. But without a structured conscious workflow accompanied with appropriate statistical methods for the integrated analysis, this can easily take a route compromising the interpretation. In this article we apply the ICH estimand framework to clinical trial integration and summarize respective critical statistical assumptions to ensure the integrated analyses are interpretable. The estimand framework is valuable for developing principles for a deeper understanding of the critical statistical aspects of planning an integrated safety analysis. Our principles address the clinical question of interest, estimand and estimation. Special focus was given to the criteria for inclusion and exclusion of the component studies in the integrated analysis, and to integration of estimates pertaining to signal detection. Performing an integrated analysis and its preparatory steps calls for a good understanding of the clinical question of interest and its estimand, care and sound practice, to enable interpretation and avoid introducing unnecessary bias. It is valuable to use the estimand framework not only for efficacy evaluations, but also for safety evaluations in clinical trials and for integrated safety analyses.

Tau-Targeted Immunotherapy for Alzheimer's Disease: Insight into Clinical Trials

The use of immunotherapy as a therapeutic approach to Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is gaining rapid interest, with the primary goal of targeting abnormalities that impact neuronal viability through specific antibodies. Currently, clinical strategies focus intensively on targeting the two main pathologies associated with AD, beta-amyloid (Ab) and tau. This review examines ongoing research in the realm of tau immunotherapy, including clinical trials that demonstrate promising potential for halting AD progression. Several trials are underway, focusing on improving tau-targeted immunotherapy tools based on passive and active immunization protocols. Tau-targeted therapies have proven relevant and demonstrated safety and efficacy in both animal models and human clinical trials. Some studies have demonstrated a reduction in tau protein aggregation in animal models, highlighting a potential mechanism by which these antibodies inhibit the spread of tau protein in the extracellular space. Recent discoveries have highlighted the potential role of tau-targeting therapy with antibodies and have revealed significant promise in treating pathological tau in AD.

Experimentally investigated “CoronaDerm-PS”-driven SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular immunity and safety

Novel coronavirus disease 2019, caused by the SARS-CoV-2, initiate humoral and cellular immune responses against diverse virus antigens. The assessment of SARS-CoV-2-specific is mainly carried out in routine practice by determining specific immunoglobulins. However, high variability in S-protein structure in new genovariants of SARS-CoV-2 virus and the lack of correlation between specific antibodies and CD8+ T-lymphocytes underlie false negative responses, and mass assessment of cellular immunity is complicated due to the complexity of applying ELISPOT and cytofluorometry techniques. To solve this issue, a diagnostic method was developed for assessing SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular immune response, which is based on a skin test followed by evaluating a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction involving antigen-specific memory T-lymphocytes. A diagnostic preparation CoronaDerm-PS is based on Cord_PS, which is a hybrid recombinant protein consisting of parts of the SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins S, M, N, E. The specific activity of this chimeric antigen was analyzed in cultured T-lymphocyte activation test by assessing interferon-γ production using cytofluorometry. To investigate the chimeric antigen specific activity, a preclinical safety study with CoronaDerm-PS preparation in experimental animals was conducted. A dose-dependent developing skin reaction was observed in 90–100% of guinea pigs vaccinated by EpiVacCorona, CoviVac, Gam-COVID-Vac, which confirms a potential for assessing post-vaccination cellular immunity using CoronaDerm-PS preparation. Upon this, the presence of functionally active T-cell-antigenic epitopes in the recombinant polypeptide allows to evaluate SARS-CoV-2-specific response illustrated by detected response after Gam-COVID-Vac (S-protein) and EpiVacCorona (N-protein) vaccination. Thus, a skin test based on CoronaDerm-PS preparation may be a promising diagnostic tool for rapid mass screening requiring no specialized laboratory equipment for assessing populational SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity. Such a test is distinguished by advantages such as ease of analysis, high specificity and sensitivity. The final decision-making on using this test in a real-world practice may achieved after conducting further clinical safety and effectiveness trials.