Safety Of Checkpoint Inhibitors Research Articles

Safety of checkpoint inhibitors in older patients with genitourinary cancers.

12059 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the care of patients with genitourinary (GU) cancers however many of the clinical trials that have led to the approval of ICIs in GU cancers often have low enrollments of older patients aged 65 and above for which safety data in this cohort is limited. Methods: A retrospective study was performed that included all patients aged 65 and older with kidney, bladder, and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), who were treated at the University of Florida Health Cancer Center between January 2018 and September 2022, and received at least one dose of ICI (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab with nivolumab, avelumab, or atezolizumab). Data was collected on all documented immune related adverse events (irAEs) that were deemed attributable to the checkpoint inhibitor by the treating provider. The grading of toxicities was determined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Results: We identified a total of 139 patients who met the inclusion criteria of our study. The ages of patients ranged from 65 to 93 and the median age was 74. Females accounted for 31 patients (22%) while 108 patients (78%) were male. There were 56 patients (40%) with bladder cancer, 58 patients (42%) with kidney cancer, and 25 patients (18%) with UTUC. An irAE was documented in 76 patients (55%) while 63 patients (45%) had no documented irAE. Patients were categorized by the highest grade of toxicity experienced. A Grade 1 toxicity was found in 15 patients (11%), while a grade 2 toxicity was found in 41 patients (29%), with 18 patients (13%) having a grade 3 toxicity, and 2 patients (1%) experiencing a grade 4 toxicity. There were no documented grade 5 toxicities, i.e. no deaths were directly attributed to treatment. We found that 27 patients (19%) required either oral or intravenous steroids to manage their irAE. Discontinuation of treatment due to an irAE was observed in 16 patients (12%). Inpatient hospitalization due to an irAE occurred in 12 patients (9%). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the majority of patients aged 65 and older either have no irAEs or developed mild irAEs when treated with ICIs. Severe and life-threatening adverse events are uncommon, rarely require hospital admission, and did not lead to any deaths. This study should help to provide valuable information on the safety of checkpoint inhibitors in older patients with GU cancers and assist in the shared decision-making process for cancer treatment. [Table: see text]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy in early triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy are being evaluated in neoadjuvant settings in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). To evaluate efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in early TNBC. Electronic search was done using PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and clinicaltrials.gov to identify relevant articles till October 31, 2020. Clinical trials evaluating checkpoint inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy in early-stage TNBC were included. Outcomes assessed included pathologic complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and safety. Meta-analysis was conducted using Cochrane review manager (RevMan) version 5.4. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed for quality using Cochrane Collaboration risk of the bias assessment tool, version 2.0 (ROB-2). GRADE analysis was done to assess the overall quality of evidence for all outcomes. Out of 116 studies screened, 5 RCTs were included in meta-analysis. Compared to control group, programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL-1) inhibitor group was associated with significant increase in rate of pCR (odd ratio [OR] =1.71 [1.38-2.11]; P < 0.00001) and EFS (1.77 [1.21-2.60]; P = 0.003). There was a significant increase in risk of serious adverse events (risk ratio [RR] =1.53 [1.28-1.83]; P < 0.00001), adverse events of special interest (AESI) of any grade (RR: 1.5 [1.34-1.69], P < 0.00001) and grade 3 or higher AESI (RR: 2.8 [1.87-4.19], P < 0.00001) with PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors compared to control. PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early TNBC show significant improvement in pCR irrespective of PDL-1 status and cancer stage.

Immune checkpoints inhibitors in the management of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. A scoping review.

Provide the current state of trials investigating the effectiveness and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. We conducted this scoping review following the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute. We searched for MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL databases, and clinical trials in search engines such as clinicaltrials.gov and clinicaltrialsregister.eu. We included clinical trials in patients over 18 years of age diagnosed with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who suffer treatment failure with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Even those who have not received prior therapy. Those clinical trials also evaluated intravenous- or intravesical-administered immune checkpoint inhibitors and those associated with BCG. Thirteen clinical trials are currently being developed with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a therapeutic alternative in patients diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Five of these have not received prior therapy with bacillus Calmette-Guérin. The remaining eight studies in patients who received BCG immunotherapy with a poor response are classified as persistent, refractory, or non-responders to BCG therapy. Also, in patients who do not accept surgical management with radical cystectomy. Preliminary results from studies such as SWOG S1605 (NCT02844816) show encouraging antitumor activity and long-lasting response patients with carcinoma in situ with or without papillary disease in terms of disease-free survival and rate free of adverse events. Recently, Keynote-057 (NCT02625961) evidenced that after 36 months of follow-up, Pembrolizumab as monotherapy was tolerable and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The checkpoint inhibitor response may offer a therapeutic alternative for patients diagnosed with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, the complete response rate documented in this scoping review is limited to patients with carcinoma in situ, with mild adverse effects, without reporting severity or death from the intervention.

Phase II clinical study of tislelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel (TRUCE-01) for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma: Bladder preservation subgroup analysis.

4589 Background: The current strategy for bladder preservation is focused on trimodality treatment, including complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT), with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Chemotherapy is usually a cisplatin-based regimen. However, many pts cannot tolerate cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy. It fails to meet clinical needs. Meanwhile, the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have now been demonstrated. We conduct a study to evaluate ICIs in combination with second-line chemotherapy agents for patients with MIBC. Methods: TRUCE-01 is a phase II trial (NCT04730219) of tislelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel before cTURBT or radical cystectomy. Pts with pure or mixed urothelial bladder cancer (T2-4a Nx M0) received tislelizumab 200mg on days 1 plus paclitaxel 200mg on days 2 every 3 weeks (Q3W) x 3 cycles followed by cTURBT or radical cystectomy. Imaging evaluation is usually done before and after the drug administration using the same tests to assess the efficacy. Pts who choose to preserve bladder usually continue their medication after cTURBT. This abstract focuses on patients with bladder preservation. Results: Between July 2020 and November 2021, 47 pts completed at least 2 cycles of treatment, 22 (47%) pts received cTURBT, 16 (34%) pts received radical cystectomy and 9 (19%) pts refuse surgery. As for radiological response, 22 achieved complete response (CR), 16 achieved partial response (PR). In the bladder-preserving subgroup, 13 CR pts and 9 PR pts selected cTURBT, pathology showed 17 pT0, 1 pTa, 3 pT1 and 1 pTis. The median medication cycle is 9 (6-11). There were 3 pts experienced grade 3-4 adverse events (CTCAE), a grade 3 rash, a grade 3 gastric perforation and a grade 4 acute renal failure. In addition, The most common grade 1-2 adverse events include alopecia (86%), fatigue (77%), rash (41%), appetite decreases (41%), hyperglycemia (36%), fever (18%), and creatinine increased (14%). Median follow-up 357 (438-291) days with 3 recurrences and 1 death. The 1-year recurrence-free survival rate was 82%. Conclusions: The early efficacy data further support the role of tislelizumab combined with paclitaxel in bladder preservation setting with an acceptable adverse events. Patients with imaging CR or PR after neoadjuvant therapy are preferred for bladder preservation. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04730219.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma following checkpoint inhibitor therapy with nivolumab

Limited case series describe conflicting results regarding the safety of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) prior to liver transplantation (LT). We reviewed single-center data on all consecutive patients who underwent LT for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with CPI between January 1, 2018, and January 30, 2021. Time from CPI to LT, immunosuppression, biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (BPACR), graft loss and death were evaluated. Five patients with a mean age 65 (range 61-71) years underwent LT after CPI with nivolumab. Time from last CPI to LT ranged from 0.3 to 11months. Two patients with <3months from the last dose of CPI to LT developed BPACR and severe hepatic necrosis, one of whom required retransplantation with recurrent BPACR but without recurrent graft loss over 38months of follow up. None of the patients who underwent LT >3months from the last dose of CPI had BPACR. In conclusion, pretransplant use of CPIs, particularly within 90days of LT, was associated with BPACR and immune-mediated hepatic necrosis. Future multicenter studies should consider a sufficient interval from the last dose of CPI to LT to mitigate the risk for adverse immune-mediated outcomes and graft loss.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma patients with BONE metastases: Results of the GETUG: AFU 26 nivoren multicenter phase II study.

342 Background: Bone metastases (BM) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with a poor prognosis based on retrospective studies in which patients were treated with antiangiogenic agents. Since the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, few data are available regarding the prognosis impact of BM or the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with bones metastatic RCC. GETUG-AFU26-NIVOREN (NIVOREN) is a French multicenter prospective study in which patients were treated with nivolumab after failure of one or more antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We therefore aim to evaluate the impact of BM on prognosis, and the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with BM enrolled in NIVOREN trial. Methods: All adult patients with BM at inclusion were included in our study. The primary endpoint of this ancillary study was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), safety, and skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with BM. Clinical data were collected prospectively, except for SRE data which were collected retrospectively in a complementary consent report form. Results: Among 720 patients treated with nivolumab in the NIVOREN study, 194 had BM at inclusion. After a median follow-up of 23.9 months, the median OS was 17.9 months in patients with BM versus 26.1 months in patients without BM (HR = 1.42 CI95% [1.13-1.79], p = 0.0023). After adjustment on sex, age, IMDC group and line of treatments, the difference was not significant (HR = 1.24, CI95% [0.98-1.56], p = 0.0707). The median PFS was shorter in patients with BM even after adjustment (2.8 versus 4.6 months, HR = 1.30 CI95% [1.08-1.56]), as well as the ORR (14.8% versus 23.3%). The safety profile was similar between patients with or without BM at inclusion. The incidence of SRE in the BM population was 36% during the treatment period with nivolumab. A post-hoc analysis evaluating the impact of bone-targeting agents in association with nivolumab on SRE incidence was performed. There was a statistically significant benefit in patients treated with bone-targeting agents on the incidence of SRE (OR = 0.367, CI95% [0.151-0.895], p = 0.0276). Conclusions: Nivolumab is associated with shorter OS, PFS, and lower ORR in patients with BM. Our study confirms, in the era of immunotherapy that patients with BM are associated with poorer prognosis and suggests that association with bone-targeting agents decreases the incidence of SRE. Clinical trial information: 2015-004117-24.

Efficacy and Safety of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer in adults (approximately 90%), and clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is the most frequent histologic subtype (approximately 75%). We reviewed the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in ccRCC, identifying 5927 articles in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science. Ten randomized control (N = 7765) and 10 non-randomized (N = 572) studies were included. Overall, 4819 patients treated with CPI combinations were compared with everolimus, sunitinib, or placebo. Overall response rates (ORR) were 9-25% with nivolumab (niv), 42% with niv + ipilimumab (ipi), 55.7% with niv + cabozantinib, 56% with niv + tivozanib vs. 5% with everolimus. ORR was 51.5-58% with avelumab + axitinib vs. 25.5% with sunitinib. ORR was 59.3-73% with pembrolizumab + tyrosine kinase inhibitor vs. 25.7% with sunitinib. ORR was 32-36% with atezolizumab + bevacizumab vs. 29-33% with sunitinib. In patients with PD-L1+ve and -ve ccRCC, niv, atezolizumab, ipi, and pembrolizumab were safe and effective alone and when combined with cabozantinib, tivozanib, axitinib, levantinib, and pegilodecakin. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab was safe and effective in ccRCC with high PD-L1 expression. Pembrolizumab was safe and effective in preventing recurrence in ccRCC patients with nephrectomy. Additional randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

Clinical predictors of survival in patients with relapsed/refractory small-cell lung cancer treated with checkpoint inhibitors: a German multicentric real-world analysis.

Objectives:Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a lung malignancy with high relapse rates and poor survival outcomes. Treatment-resistant disease relapse occurs frequently and effective salvage therapies are urgently needed.Materials and Methods:We aimed to define efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in a heterogeneous population of relapsed and refractory SCLC patients in a large retrospective multicentric real-world cohort across German tertiary care centers.Results:A total of 111 patients from 11 treatment centers were included. Median age of all patients was 64 years, and 63% were male. Approximately one-third of all patients had poor performance status [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ⩾ 2], and 37% had known brain metastases. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median number of prior therapy lines of 2 (range, 1–8). Median follow-up of the entire cohort was 21.7 months. Nivolumab and Nivolumab/Ipilimumab were the most common regimens. Overall disease control rate was 27.2% in all patients and was numerically higher in CPI combination regimens compared with single-agent CPI (31.8% versus 23.8%; p = 0.16). Median overall survival (OS) was 5.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.7–9.9 months]. The 12- and 24-month survival rates were 31.8% and 12.7%, respectively. The 12-week death rate was 27.9%. Disease control and response rate were significantly lower in patients with liver metastases. Platinum sensitivity (to first-line treatment), metastatic burden, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) showed prognostic impact on survival in univariate analysis. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was a significant and independent predictor of survival in univariate (p = 0.01) and multivariate analyses [hazard ratio (HR), 2.1; 95% CI = 1.1–4.1; p = 0.03].Conclusion:CPI in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) SCLC is of limited value in an overall patient cohort; however, long-term survival, in particular with CPI combination strategies, is possible. Clinical characteristics allow a more differentiated subgroup selection, in particular patients with low NLR showed less benefit from CPI in R/R SCLC.

1655P Real-world outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory small cell lung cancer treated with checkpoint inhibitors in Tertiary Care Centers across Germany

Checkpoint Inhibitors (CPI) have achieved modest clinical activity as salvage therapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer in prospective clinical trials. Data regarding the real-world efficacy and safety of CPI in relapsed / refractory SCLC is widely lacking.

Immunotherapy in elderly patients

In the recent years the growing life expectancy of the population and increasing cancer burden in elderly patients substantiate the urgent need for the search of optimal cancer treatment strategies. This article provides an overview of the current literature on the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in the elderly population. A literature search for published studies using Medline (PubMed) and Elibrary databases was performed. All studies containing data on treatment results including tumor response criteria, treatment response rate, tumor control rate, overall survival were included. Case studies, animal studies and studies containing duplicate results were excluded from the analysis. In elderly patients with cancer there is a substantial number of comorbid conditions and functional disorders, which may decrease the efficacy and modulate the tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Besides, different changes associated with immunologic ageing, including thymolysis, increase of the number of memory B-cells and a decrease of hematopoesis intensity are observed. Several studies performed a comparative analysis of efficacy and toxicity of ICIs in elderly and younger patients. In most cases similar results for efficacy and toxicity were demonstrated. To evaluate the toxicity and the influence of treatment on functional status and other important measures in geriatric population further studies of factors, influencing the tolerability and treatment response of newer ICI in elderly cancer patients are needed, including additional adverse events associated with treatment.

A prospective cohort study on the safety of checkpoint inhibitors in older cancer patients – the ELDERS study

ObjectiveOlder cancer patients are underrepresented in the pivotal trials of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). This study aimed to investigate the impact of an ageing immune system on CPI-related toxicity and provide evidence for the role of geriatric assessments with CPI.MethodsThe ELDERS study is a prospective observational study with two cohorts: older (70+ years of age) and younger (<70 years of age). Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer or melanoma starting single-agent CPI were eligible. The older cohort was assessed for frailty with Geriatric-8 (G8) screening, which when positive (<15 points) was followed by a holistic set of geriatric assessments. Primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3-5 immune-related adverse events (irAEs).ResultsOne hundred and forty patients were enrolled with 43% being pretreated and pembrolizumab represented 92% of treatments on study. The older cohort had a significantly higher comorbidity burden (P < 0.001) and polypharmacy (P = 0.004). While 50% of older patients had a positive G8 screening, 60% on this frail subgroup had a performance status score of 0 or 1. There was no significant difference in the incidence of irAEs grade 3-5 between older and younger cohorts (18.6% versus 12.9%; odds ratio 1.55, confidence interval 95% 0.61-3.89; P = 0.353). Exposure to systemic steroids due to irAEs was numerically longer for older patients (22 versus 8 weeks; P = 0.208). A positive G8 screening predicted hospital admissions (P = 0.031) and risk of death (P = 0.01).ConclusionsThe use of CPI in older patients was not associated with more high-grade toxicity. The G8 screening identified a subgroup with higher risk of AEs and its implementation should be considered in the context of CPI.

Clinical benefits of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Significant improvement of objective response rate and overall survival period has been achieved in several types of solid tumors by treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, which shed some light on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Currently, a number of clinical trials concerning the application of checkpoint inhibitors in HCC are ongoing, some of which have shown favorable expectations. Hereby, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing studies to reveal the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in advanced HCC. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 31, 2020. The clinical trials reporting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced HCC patients were eligible. Overall results of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progression of disease (PD), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and rate of adverse events (AE) with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated as the primary focus of the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted primarily according to the categories of PD-1 inhibitor or PD-L1 inhibitor and combination therapy or monotherapy. In addition, pooled results of PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) combining with anti-VEGF agents were calculated separately. A total of 20 studies with 1232 patients were included. The overall CR, PR and SD rate were 0.01 (95% CI 0.01-0.03), 0.17 (95% CI 0.14-0.22) and 0.39 (95% CI 0.34-0.43), respectively. The overall ORR and DCR were 0.20 (95% CI 0.16-0.24) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.54-0.67), respectively. The overall PFS and OS were 3.58months (95% CI 2.65-4.50) and 12.24months (95% CI 10.48-14.00), respectively. For patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 mAb combing with anti-VEGF agent, ORR was 29% (95% CI 0.15-0.43) and DCR was 77% (95% CI 0.70-0.84). For all included studies, the overall rate of AE was 0.63 (95% CI 0.45-0.78) and serious adverse events (SAE) was 0.11 (95% CI 0.06-0.22). PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors showed favorable outcomes concerning response rates and survival periods in advanced HCC. Updated results from high-quality clinical trials are expected to validate these findings.

Retrospective study to assess the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in advanced urothelial carcinoma in real-world setting.

e17043 Background: Checkpoint Inhibitors (CPI) have become a new standard of treatment in advanced urothelial carcinoma. However, little is known regarding the outcome of patients in daily practice.We aimed to assess tumor response and toxicity of CPIs in a cohort of patients treated in “real world” conditions. In parallel, a comprehensive molecular study in tumor samples from these patients, is ongoing. Methods: We designed an observational retrospective study within the “Grupo Centro” collaborative group. Adult patients diagnosed of metastasic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and treated with CPIs between 2011-2019 in any of the 20 centers of the group, were eligible. Results: Up to date 100 patients have been included (82% males) with a median age of 74 years (48 -96). In 82% patients primary was bladder cancer. Most common metastasic sites were bone (26%) and liver (16%).With a median follow up of 10,6 months(mo) median progression free survival (mPFS) was 6,6mo (1,4-95,4 range) and median Overall Survival (mOS) was 21.3mo (3,8-121,8). 38% of patients received CPIs in first line(L): atezolizumab:27, pembrolizumab: 10, nivolumab:1. The median number of cycles was 8,2. Up to 51% received platinum-based combinations in first line. 69% (69/100) pts received 2L treatment: 68% with CPIs, 27,5% with chemotherapy and 4% with FGFR inhibitors (as part of a clinical trial). 2L mPFS was 3,5 mo (1,9-25.9). 23% (23/100) patients received 3L, of them 26% (6/23) were treated with CPIs. 3L mPFS:8,3mo(0,4-43,8). As a whole, patients treated with CPI accross different lines, achieved complete response in 8% of the cases, partial response in 18% and stable disease in 15%. Up to 44% of cases presented progressive disease as best response and evaluation was not available in 15%. Most common G1-2 AEs related to immunotherapy were: asthenia:31%,pruritus:16% and anorexia: 9%.10% pts experienced G3-4 toxicity: asthenia G3: 4, diarrhea G3: 1, erythrodysesthesia G3:1, arthromyalgia G3: 1, cardiac arrest G4:1,pneumonitis G4:1,anemia G3:1. Conclusions: This study confirms the efficacy and security of CPIs in real world. Response rates and toxicity profile were comparable to those reported in clinical trials.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced urological cancers with pre-existing autoimmune disorders: a retrospective international multicenter study

BackgroundThere is limited experience regarding the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in patients with autoimmune disorders (AD) and advanced urological cancers as they are generally excluded from clinical...

Comparison of efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with genitourinary cancers aged below and above 75 years.

e16101 Background: Checkpoint-inhibitors have recently been introduced in the treatment of patients with genitourinary cancers. However, the use in elderly patients is controversial due to putative age-associated changes including the dysregulation of the immune system. We sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy in patients younger and older than 75 years of age. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with renal cell carcinoma and urothelial cancer treated with different immunotherapeutic agents between August 2015 and September 2018 at a high-volume single institution. Eligible patients received at least one cycle of single agent or a combination of checkpoint inhibitors as first or following treatment line. Immune-related adverse events (irAE) were graded using the NCI CTCAE v 4.0. Clinicopathological parameters including gender, cancer entity, ECOG, adverse events, comorbidities and response to treatment were stratified by age ≥ 75 vs. &lt; 75 years and tested with a Pearson's chi-squared test. Additionally, we evaluated the impact of irAE on oncological outcome using the log-rank test. Results: 79 patients were identified, of those 27 (34.2%) were 75 years and older (15 renal cell carcinoma and 12 urothelial cancer patients) and 52 (65.8%) were younger than 75 years (39 renal cell carcinoma and 13 urothelial cancer patients). 2 complete responses were achieved in the elderly group and 6 in the younger group (p = 0.56). Disease control rate (stable disease, partial and complete response) was 48,1% in the elderly group and 53.8% in the younger group (p = 0.631). We observed a total of 30 irAEs (18 grade 1-2 and 12 grade 3-4), with an even distribution among the groups (≥75 years: 1 grade 4 AE; &lt; 75 years: 12 grade 3-4 AEs). Except for ECOG ≥2 (p = 0.009) and ≥2 comorbidities (p &lt; 0.001), there was no difference when groups were stratified by age. Both disease control rate and irAE did not differ between age subgroups. Occurrence of irAE showed no impact on oncological survival. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that patients over 75 years of age with renal cell and urothelial cancer treated with checkpoint-inhibitors respond with a good toxicity profile and an efficacy comparable with the younger population. irAE seem to have no impact on prognosis.

Is inmunotherapy a safe treatment in bladder cancer? A retrospective study in daily practice.

e14083 Background: Several checkpoint inhibitors antibodies have been approved to treat bladder cancer, and many trials are still ongoing. However, few data about their efficacy and safety outside of a clinical trial have been published. Here we report our experience in managing immune-related toxicity in our daily practice. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 23 patients (pts) with metastatic bladder cancer treated with checkpoint inhibitors in Clínico San Carlos University Hospital from April 2016 to September 2018. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of checkpoint inhibitors in daily practice. Results: Median age was 75 years (range 53-92) and 75% were men. The performance status at the beginning of immunotherapy treatment was 0 in 4 pts (17.4%), 1 in 16 pts (69.6%) and 2 in 3 pts (13%). Thirteen pts (56.5%) received the treatment as first line, 6 (26.1%) as second line and 4 (17.4%) as third line and beyond. 18 pts (78.3%) received immunotherapy as monotherapy (15 pts Atezolizumab and 2 pts Pembrolizumab), 3 pts (13%) received an immunotherapy combination with Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab, and 2 pts (8.7%) received chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (Carboplatin plus Avelumab or Atezolizumab). Of the analyzed patients, 36% did not develop any immune related adverse event (irAE). However, 64% did present some side effect. The most common side effect was asthenia (12.5%), cutaneous (8.3%), endocrine (5.6%), gastrointestinal (4.2%) and hepatic (2.8%). Only16.6% of the events required some kind of treatment (9.7% required steroids). Three patients had grade 3 or 4 toxicity, 1 patient on Atezolizumab presented with grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 hepatic toxicity, another patient on Atezolizumab presented two heart attacks after the two infusions and eventually died, lastly a patient on Durvalumab + Tremelimuab suffered grade 3 hypophysitis. Conclusions: Incidence and therapeutic management of irAEs occurring in our clinical setting closely resembles that reported in retrospective series even though they were mostly elderly patients and many of them were heavily pretreated. Increasing our experience and knowledge in the clinical setting will improve and optimize the use of these drugs.

PT319 - Comparison of efficacy and safety of checkpoint-inhibitors in patients with genitourinary cancers aged below and above 75 years

e16101Background: Checkpoint-inhibitors have recently been introduced in the treatment of patients with genitourinary cancers. However, the use in elderly patients is controversial due to putative ...

Abstract 4554: Assessment of the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of solid-tumor malignancies in a community cancer hospital

Abstract Introduction: High dose chemotherapy, radiation, and/or surgical resection have historically been the standard therapy for patients with progressive malignancies. However, promising studies have shown immunotherapy may improve overall survival and reduce tumor burden in advanced disease. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-1 inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab and PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab, are approved for use in several solid tumors, but the response to these agents has been limited. This study was designed to identify predictors for the therapeutic response to immunotherapy agents in a community cancer hospital. Procedures: A retrospective review using the electronic medical record system was done to identify 43 patients treated with immunotherapy at Avera Cancer Institute. The inclusion criteria included patients who had solid organ malignancies, received checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy between May 31, 2014 and May 31, 2017, and completed next generation sequencing of tumor DNA. The exclusion criteria included patients who were less than eighteen years of age, pregnant, or received care in an outreach clinic when records were not available. Data obtained from the records included age, sex, diagnosis, treatment history, immunotherapy agent used, start and end date of immunotherapy agent, clinical outcome, pathology results, adverse reactions, and next generation sequencing results of tumor DNA. The collected data was assessed for patient characteristics and biomarkers that predicted responses to immune checkpoint blockade in solid tumors. Disease progression was assessed in correspondence with the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors guidelines. Results: A total of 43 patients were included, 14 male and 29 female. The median patient age was 66 years old. The main malignancies included were, breast (11 patients), lung (10 patients), and ovarian (7 patients). On average, the patients were treated with three previous lines of therapy before receiving immunotherapy treatment. The most common immunotherapy agent was pembrolizumab, with 28 of the patients receiving this, followed by 14 patients treated with nivolumab and one treated with atezolizumab. The median time patients on immunotherapy was 118 days. Patients with longer duration of immunotherapy, fewer previous treatment lines, and higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) had the best response to checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusions: The predictive biomarkers found in this study can be used to assist in patient selection for immunotherapy in the clinical setting, including TMB and the number of lines of previous therapy. Further studies will continue to find predictors of non-response and hyperprogressors. We hope to further evaluate patients who experienced a durable response to create new hypotheses about indicators of response. Citation Format: Rachel Elsey, Nathan Smith, April Lick, Lauren Metzger, Casey Williams, Brian Leyland-Jones, Ping Ye. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of solid-tumor malignancies in a community cancer hospital [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4554.

The experience of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Chinese patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective case series.

Melanomas in Chinese patients show relatively higher rates of acral and mucosal types than in other populations. However, the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor therapies against these melanoma subtypes is not well defined. We analyzed 52 patients treated with ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, or a combination of both to evaluate the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in Chinese patients with advanced melanoma, particularly those with acral and mucosal types. The objective response rates (ORRs) were 0, 25, and 20% for ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab, respectively. Pembrolizumab contained therapy was as effective in acral and mucosal melanoma patients (ORR 26.7 and 20%, respectively) as in non-acral cutaneous melanoma patients (ORR 26.7%). Baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels and relative lymphocyte counts were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. The incidences of grade 3-4 adverse events were 14% in the two monotherapy groups and 30% in the combined therapy group. The most frequent adverse events were elevation of aminotransferase, skin toxicity, thyroid dysfunction, pyrexia, and fatigue. Treatment-related rash or vitiligo was associated with a better prognosis. In summary, pembrolizumab-based therapy resulted in meaningful efficacy and good tolerability in Chinese patients with melanoma, including those with acral and mucosal types.