Safety Of Brigatinib Research Articles

Prospective observational study to explore genes and proteins predicting efficacy and safety of brigatinib for ALK-gene rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer: study protocol for ABRAID study (WJOG11919L).

ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) are effective for treating non-small-cell lung cancer with ALK gene rearrangement; however, resistance is inevitable. Brigatinib is a unique ALK-TKI that is effective against many resistance mutations. However, data on factors associated with its efficacy and resistance mechanisms are limited. This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of brigatinib in the real world and explore factors related to its efficacy, safety, and resistance mechanisms. Prospective observational study. This study is approved by the Ethics Committee of Wakayama Medical University. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients before study-related procedures. This study comprises three cohorts. Cohorts A, B, and 0 will enroll patients receiving alectinib as the first ALK-TKI, receiving alectinib as the first ALK-TKI and subsequently cytotoxic agents and/or lorlatinib after alectinib, and without a history of ALK-TKI, respectively. Overall, 100, 30, and 50 patients will be enrolled in Cohorts A, B, and 0, respectively. Circulating tumor DNA before starting brigatinib and at disease progression will be analyzed in all cohorts using a hypersensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) PGDx Elio plasma resolve panel. Serum protein levels will be analyzed using the Milliplex xMAP assay system with a Luminex 200 (Luminex, Austin, USA). The enrollment period is 31 months and the patients will be observed for 2 years after enrollment. Archived tissues will be collected for NGS analysis, gene expression analysis, and immunohistochemistry staining 1 year after completion of registration. Quality of life and safety evaluation using electronic patient-reported outcomes will be investigated. This study will elucidate predictors of ALK-TKI efficacy and resistance mechanisms and evaluate the efficacy and safety of brigatinib in a real-world setting. The results will provide crucial information for establishing treatment strategies, discovering novel biomarkers, and developing new therapeutic agents. UMIN000042439.

Integrated efficacy and safety of brigatinib in patients with ALK TKI-naive advanced ALK+ NSCLC in the ALTA-1L and J-ALTA studies.

9078 Background: Brigatinib demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in patients (pts) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naive ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase 3 (ALTA-1L) and phase 2 (J-ALTA) trials. We present results of integrated efficacy and safety analyses of ALTA-1L and J-ALTA. Methods: ALTA-1L (NCT02737501) and J-ALTA (NCT03410108; conducted in Japan) were open-label, multicenter studies in pts with advanced or metastatic ALK+ NSCLC. Pts in ALTA-1L and in part 3 of J-ALTA were ALK TKI-naive. Stable or asymptomatic brain metastases were allowed in both studies. Pts received brigatinib 180 mg qd (7-day lead-in at 90 mg). Primary endpoints were blinded independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in ALTA-1L and IRC-assessed 12-month PFS in the J-ALTA ALK TKI-naive cohort (both per RECIST v 1.1). Secondary endpoints included IRC-assessed objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, intracranial ORR, intracranial PFS, overall survival, and safety. Pooled efficacy and safety data from both studies are presented. Results: The pooled analysis population included 169 pts (ALTA-1L, N = 137; J-ALTA ALK TKI-naive cohort, N = 32). Median follow-up overall was 35.8 months (last pt last contact: ALTA-1L, January 2021; J-ALTA, July 2021). Most (66%) pts were aged < 65 years, 24% had baseline brain metastases, 95% had stage IV disease at study entry, and 21% had received prior chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease. With brigatinib treatment, median PFS by IRC was 29.3 months (95% CI, 23.9‒44.7). The confirmed ORR was 79% (95% CI, 72‒85%), with 36 complete responses and 97 partial responses. Median duration of response was 38.1 months (95% CI, 22.9‒not reached). Median overall survival was not reached; the 3-year survival rate was 74% (95% CI: 66‒80%; 84 pts at risk). Intracranial ORR and intracranial PFS will be presented. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 74% of pts; the most common were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (31%), hypertension (18%), and increased lipase (16%). Any grade interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis was reported in 12 (7%) of pts. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 11% of pts. Conclusions: Brigatinib treatment demonstrated clinically meaningful systemic and intracranial efficacy in this integrated analysis of pts with ALK TKI-naive advanced or metastatic ALK+ NSCLC in the ALTA-1L or J-ALTA trials. Safety results were consistent with the known profile for brigatinib, with no new safety findings. Clinical trial information: NCT02737501 ; NCT03410108 .

Efficacy and safety of brigatinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Brigatinib is a central nervous system-active second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor that targets a broad range of ALK rearrangements in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current study aimed to analyze the pooled effects and adverse events of brigatinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. The pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with DerSimonian-Laird method and the random effect model. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of brigatinib were 64% (95% CI 45%-83%) and 88% (95% CI 80%-96%), respectively. The pooled mPFS was 10.52 months (95% CI 7.66-13.37). In the subgroup analyses by treatment line, the highest mPFS was reached in first-line treatment (24.00 months, 95% CI 18.40-43.20), followed by post-crizotinib second-line treatment (mPFS=16.26 months, 95% CI 12.87-19.65), and second-line with any prior ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mPFS=12.96 months, 95% CI 11.14-14.78). Among patients with any baseline brain metastases, the pooled intracranial ORR (iORR) was estimated as 54% (95% CI 35%-73%) for any treatment line, and 60% (95% CI 39%-81%) for first-line treatment. Intracranial PFS (iPFS) reached 19.26 months (95% CI 14.82-23.70) in patients with any baseline brain metastases. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increased (44%, 95% CI 26%-63%), diarrhea (37%, 95% CI 27%-48%), and nausea (28%, 95% CI 17%-39%) of any grade were the most common adverse events. Brigatinibis effective in the treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, particularly showingrobust intracranial PFS. Brigatinib used as first-line treatment yielded superior PFS compared with brigatinib used as other treatment lines. These results suggested a benefit of using brigatinib earlier in the patient's management. All adverse events are manageable, with CPK increased and gastrointestinal reactions found to be the most common types. https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-3-0142/, identifier (INPLASY202230141).

MA13.03 Integrated Efficacy and Safety of Brigatinib Following Alectinib Treatment in the ALTA-2 and J-ALTA Studies

Alectinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, is a standard-of-care option for patients with ALK-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, most patients eventually develop disease progression on alectinib. Although subsequent ALK inhibitor therapy is beneficial in these patients, few trials have evaluated ALK inhibitors in patients with NSCLC following progression on alectinib. We present integrated efficacy and safety results from two phase 2 studies of brigatinib treatment in patients with ALK+ NSCLC with disease progression on alectinib.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Brigatinib in Crizotinib-Refractory ALK+ NSCLC: Final Results of the Phase 1/2 and Randomized Phase 2 (ALTA) Trials

IntroductionWe report brigatinib long-term efficacy and safety from phase 1/2 and phase 2 (ALTA) trials in ALK–rearrangement positive (ALK+) NSCLC. MethodsThe phase 1/2 study evaluated brigatinib 30 to 300 mg/d in patients with advanced malignancies. ALTA randomized patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC to brigatinib 90 mg once daily (arm A) or 180 mg once daily (7-d lead-in at 90 mg; arm B). ResultsIn the phase 1/2 study, 79 of 137 brigatinib-treated patients had ALK+ NSCLC; 71 were crizotinib pretreated. ALTA randomized 222 patients (n = 112 in arm A; n = 110 in arm B). Median follow-up at phase 1/2 study end (≈5.6 y after last patient enrolled) was 27.7 months; at ALTA study end (≈4.4 y after last patient enrolled), 19.6 months (A) and 28.3 months (B). Among patients with ALK+ NSCLC in the phase 1/2 study, median investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8–21.2); median overall survival was 47.6 months (28.6–not reached). In ALTA, median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.2 months (7.4–11.1) in arm A and 15.6 months (11.1–18.5) in arm B; median independent review committee (IRC)-assessed PFS was 9.9 (7.4–12.8) and 16.7 (11.6–21.4) months, respectively; median overall survival was 25.9 (18.2–45.8) and 40.6 (32.5–not reached) months, respectively. Median intracranial PFS for patients with any brain metastases was 12.8 (9.2–18.4) months in arm A and 18.4 (12.6–23.9) months in arm B. No new safety signals were identified versus previous analyses. ConclusionsBrigatinib exhibited sustained long-term activity and PFS with manageable safety in patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC.

CO78 Efficacy and Safety of Brigatinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Brigatinib is a central nervous system-active second-generation ALK inhibitor that targets a broad range of ALK mutations in patients with NSCLC. This study aimed to analyze brigatinib’s pooled effects and adverse events in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

A phase II randomized, open-labelled, multicenter study of safety and efficacy of combination brigatinib and carboplatin-pemetrexed therapy or brigatinib monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer (IFCT-2101 MASTERPROTOCOL ALK).

TPS9144 Background: Second generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKI), including brigatinib, provide substantial therapeutic benefit in first-line treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC patients (pts) but relapse eventually occurs in all pts due to development of drug resistance, possibly caused by emergence of drug-tolerant cells (DTC). Combining chemotherapy to TKI may prevent DTC emergence in preclinical studies, and results in prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We hypothesize that combination of second generation ALK-TKI with chemotherapy will improve clinical outcomes in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients. The IFCT-2101 MASTERPROTOCOL ALK trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of brigatinib and carboplatin-pemetrexed combination in treatment-naïve metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC. Methods: The IFCT-2101 MASTERPROTOCOL ALK randomized, open-label phase II trial will enrol 110 pts in 30 French centers over 24 months. Eligible pts will have metastatic NSCLC with ALK-fusion according to local testing, be untreated for advanced disease, and have an ECOG Performance Status (PS) of 0-1 and at least one measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1. Pts with asymptomatic and stable brain metastases (BM) will be eligible. Exclusion criteria include leptomeningeal metastases. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive brigatinib monotherapy (Arm A) or combination brigatinib and carboplatin-pemetrexed therapy (Arm B), with PS (0 vs 1) and BM (presence vs absence) as stratification factors. Brigatinib will be administered at a dose of 90 mg QD for a 7-day lead-in period followed by 180 mg QD continuously, in 28-day cycles. In Arm B, 4 cycles of carboplatin (AUC 5) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) therapy every 3 weeks will be added at Day 8 of brigatinib treatment. Treatment will continue until progression, intolerable toxicity or discontinuation. The first 26 pts enrolled in Arm B will represent the population of a safety phase, during which adverse events (AE) will be closely monitored by an independent data monitoring committee. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed 12-month PFS rate. Secondary endpoints include independently-reviewed 12-month PFS rate, overall response rate (ORR), 12-month intracranial PFS and ORR, incidence, nature and severity of AEs, and impact of ALK-fusion detection, co-mutations and clearance of circulating tumor (ct) DNA (Guardant360) on outcome. Exploratory objectives include the evaluation of early blood ctDNA decrease on patient outcome. The study is enrolling and primary completion date is March 2025. Clinical trial information: NCT05200481.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Brigatinib in First-Line Treatments for Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison.

(1) Background: The relative efficacy and safety of brigatinib compared with other next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors remains unclear, as first-line head-to-head trials have not been conducted. (2) Methods: Electronic databases were systematically searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCT) from January 2010 to October 2021. Outcomes evaluated by indirect treatment comparison (ITC) included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. (3) Results: Nine RCTs with 2484 patients assessing crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib, and lorlatinib were included. In intent-to-treat (ITT) patients, brigatinib significantly prolonged blinded independent review committee-assessed PFS compared with crizotinib (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.66) and ceritinib (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.60) and had a comparable PFS with other 2nd-generation ALK inhibitors. Subgroup analyses of patients with baseline brain metastases and Asian patients yielded results similar to the base case. Brigatinib significantly reduced the risk of death compared with crizotinib (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.87) after adjusting for treatment crossover in the crizotinib arm. No significant differences were observed in OS between brigatinib and other next-generation ALK inhibitors. Brigatinib had significantly superior effects in ORR and intracranial ORR compared to crizotinib. The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs was similar between brigatinib and other next-generation ALK inhibitors (except for alectinib), while brigatinib could significantly delay the time to worsening in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL) vs. crizotinib (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.98). (4) Conclusions: Brigatinib had longer PFS compared to crizotinib and ceritinib and had comparable efficacy and safety profile with other 2nd-generation ALK inhibitors in first-line treatments for patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Brigatinib in Japanese ALK positive NSCLC patients previously treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: J-ALTA.

9537 Background: Brigatinib is an ALK inhibitor with demonstrated activity against ALK resistance mutations. To evaluate efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study was conducted. We report the efficacy and safety of brigatinib in patients who have progressed on alectinib with or without prior crizotinib and of those who previously received up to two ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with or without prior chemotherapy. Methods: A safety evaluation lead-in was followed by an expansion stage of an ALK TKI-naïve and two ALK TKI-refractory cohorts. The refractory cohorts included patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV NSCLC with ALK rearrangements. This report describes efficacy results from the post-alectinib patients in the expansion cohort and safety results from all refractory patients. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) assessed by IRC, secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and intracranial ORR (iORR). Brigatinib was administered at 180 mg QD with 90 mg QD lead-in for the first 7 days, and efficacy was evaluated every 8 weeks. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled in 28 sites, including a cohort of 47 patients with prior alectinib, with/without crizotinib between January 2018 and September 2019. The primary analysis of brigatinib in this cohort (data cut-off date 26 September 2019) demonstrated an IRC-assessed, confirmed ORR of 30% and a median DoR of 6.1 months. The median PFS was 7.3 months. Clinically meaningful intracranial efficacy was also observed (see table). Grade ≥3 TEAEs included blood creatine phosphokinase increase (18.1%), lipase increase (13.9%), hypertension (11.1%), amylase increase (4.2%), and pneumonitis (1.4%). Brigatinib also showed anti-tumor activity in patients with refractory secondary mutations in the ALK kinase domain, including G1202R, I1171N, V1180L, and L1196M. Conclusions: Brigatinib showed clinically meaningful efficacy in Japanese patients refractory to prior alectinib (first line or post crizotinib), regardless of prior chemotherapy. The safety profile of brigatinib was consistent with prior studies and no new safety findings were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03410108 . [Table: see text]

Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response analyses from the pivotal ALTA-1L study: Model-based analyses supporting the brigatinib dose in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

e21725 Background: Brigatinib is a next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with differential activity by dose (90 mg vs 180 mg [with a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg] qd) in the phase 2 post-crizotinib ALTA trial (NCT02094573). Herein, we describe results from population PK and exposure-response analyses of the efficacy and safety of brigatinib 180 mg qd (with a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg) from data in the first-line phase 3 ALTA-1L study (NCT02737501). Methods: Brigatinib plasma concentration-time data were described by a 3-compartment model with transit compartment absorption. Post hoc individual apparent clearance estimates for brigatinib were obtained using Bayesian re-estimation and used to calculate time-averaged area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values for logistic regression analyses of relationships to response endpoints (confirmed objective response rate [ORR], intracranial ORR) and time-varying AUC values for parametric time-to-event models of relationships to progression-free survival (PFS). Population PK modeling, covariate analysis, and simulations were performed using NONMEM (version 7.3 or higher), running under PsN (Perl-speaks-NONMEM, version 4.6 or higher), while exposure–efficacy and safety analyses were performed using R (version 3.5.2 or higher). Results: Brigatinib PK parameters and estimated systemic exposures for patients in ALTA-1L (ALK TKI–naive setting) were similar to those in the 180 mg qd arm of ALTA. Patient covariates including weight, sex, age, race, and renal function (CrCL ≥30 mL/min) were not found to impact brigatinib exposure, suggesting no dose adjustment based on these covariates. In the exposure-response analyses, brigatinib exposure was not a significant predictor of response (≥partial response) or PFS. This suggests that the efficacy benefit was consistent across the range of exposures achieved with the 180 mg dosing regimen including after dose modifications. There was a significant relationship ( P< 0.05) between exposure and certain laboratory abnormalities (increased amylase and lipase). There was no relationship between exposure and CPK elevation, and brigatinib exposure had no effect on time to first dose reduction. Conclusions: These results support a favorable benefit/risk profile of the proposed 180 mg qd brigatinib dose (with a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg) for the front-line treatment of patients with ALK+ NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02737501.

1586TiP - Phase III ALTA-3 study of brigatinib (BRG) vs alectinib (ALC) in patients (pts) with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)−positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that progressed on crizotinib (CRZ)

BackgroundThe second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) ALC has demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in ALK+ NSCLC pts who have progressed on CRZ. However, resistance to ALC eventually develops, with secondary resistance mutations detected in approximately 50% of pts and a median progression-free survival (PFS) <1 year. BRG is a next-generation ALK TKI designed to have potent and broad activity against ALK mutants. Post-CRZ, BRG demonstrated high systemic and central nervous system (CNS) objective response rates (ORRs) and the longest reported median PFS of any ALK inhibitor in this setting (16.3–16.7mo) (Huber. J Clin Oncol 2018;36; Bazhenova. Ann Oncol 2017;28). The current trial was designed to compare efficacy and safety of BRG vs ALC in pts with ALK+ NSCLC that has progressed on CRZ. Trial designThe second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) ALC has demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in ALK+ NSCLC pts who have progressed on CRZ. However, resistance to ALC eventually develops, with secondary resistance mutations detected in approximately 50% of pts and a median progression-free survival (PFS) <1 year. BRG is a next-generation ALK TKI designed to have potent and broad activity against ALK mutants. Post-CRZ, BRG demonstrated high systemic and central nervous system (CNS) objective response rates (ORRs) and the longest reported median PFS of any ALK inhibitor in this setting (16.3–16.7mo) (Huber. J Clin Oncol 2018;36; Bazhenova. Ann Oncol 2017;28). The current trial was designed to compare efficacy and safety of BRG vs ALC in pts with ALK+ NSCLC that has progressed on CRZ.Table1586TiPTablePrimary EndpointBlinded independent review committee (BIRC)−assessed PFS per RECIST v1.1Secondary EndpointsBIRC-assessed intracranial PFS Overall survival Investigator- and BIRC-assessed ORR, time to response, and duration of response (DOR) BIRC-assessed intracranial ORR and DOR Safety/tolerability Health-related quality of lifeSelected Exploratory EndpointsBIRC-assessed CNS efficacy per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases criteria (intracranial ORR, DOR, and PFS) Molecular determinants of efficacy and safety with BRG and ALC Clinical trial identificationNCT03596866. Editorial acknowledgementPeloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health Company; funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Legal entity responsible for the studyARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. FundingARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. DisclosureS. Popat: Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim, Epizyme, BMS, Clovis Oncology, Roche, Lilly, Takeda; Honoraria (self): Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Roche, Takeda, Chugai Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Guardant Health, AbbVie; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Merck Sharp & Dohme. G. Liu: Research grant / Funding (institution): Takeda, AstraZeneca, Roche, Bayer, Boehringer Ingerheim; Honoraria (self): Roche, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck,Novartis, EMD Serano, Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer. S. Lu: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hutchison MediPharma, Simcere, Roche, JS InnoPharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca, Roche; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca, Hutchison MediPharma. G. Song: Full / Part-time employment: Takeda. V. Samnotra: Full / Part-time employment: Takeda. J.C. Yang: Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Roche/Genentech/Chugai, Astellas, MSD, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Novartis, Celgene, Merrimack, Yuhan Pharmaceuticals, BMS, Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Hansoh Pharmaceuticals.

Phase 2 study of brigatinib in patients (pts) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)−positive, advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that progressed on alectinib or ceritinib.

TPS9115 Background: Second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) alectinib and ceritinib have demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in ALK TKI-pretreated and TKI-naive NSCLC. However, as with crizotinib, resistance to alectinib and ceritinib eventually develops, with secondary resistance mutations detected in approximately 50% of pts. Brigatinib is a next-generation ALK TKI designed to have potent and broad activity against ALK mutants. Post-crizotinib, brigatinib demonstrated high systemic and CNS objective response rates (ORR) and the longest reported median progression-free survival (PFS) of any ALK inhibitor in this setting (16.3–16.7 mo) (Huber. J Clin Oncol 2018;36; Bazhenova. Ann Oncol 2017;28); efficacy was demonstrated regardless of mutations. Based on nonclinical and clinical data, brigatinib may show efficacy in ALK+ NSCLC that has developed resistance or failed to respond to alectinib/ceritinib. This trial was designed to assess efficacy and safety of brigatinib in pts with ALK+ NSCLC that has progressed on alectinib or ceritinib. Methods: This is a phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, international trial (NCT03535740) in pts (≥18 y) with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC and disease progression on alectinib or ceritinib (± prior crizotinib; ≤3 different systemic regimens for locally advanced/metastatic disease). Pts receive oral brigatinib 180 mg QD with 7-day lead-in at 90 mg QD. Treatment beyond progression or escalation to brigatinib 240 mg QD is permitted. Primary endpoint: independent review committee (IRC)−assessed confirmed ORR (cORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints: investigator (INV)-assessed cORR, duration of response (INV- and IRC-assessed), PFS, disease control rate, and time to response; in pts with baseline brain metastases: IRC-assessed intracranial cORR, duration of intracranial response, and intracranial PFS; OS; safety/tolerability; and HRQoL. Exploratory endpoints include biomarker analyses. The study was initiated in Dec 2018 at 78 sites (North America, Europe, Asia), with a planned sample size of 103 pts. Accrual is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03535740.

Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in ALTA: The randomized phase 2 study of brigatinib (BRG) in advanced ALK+ non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

9066 Background: The ALTA trial (NCT02094573), an open-label, phase 2, randomized, multicenter, international study, evaluated the efficacy and safety of BRG (arm A: 90 mg qd and arm B: 180 mg qd with 7-day lead-in at 90 mg) in patients (pts) with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase–positive (ALK+) NSCLC whose disease had progressed on prior therapy with crizotinib (CRZ). The objective of this analysis was to describe pt-reported outcomes (PROs) in the ALTA study. Methods: PROs were collected using the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline and on the first day of each cycle. Multivariable mixed effects models were constructed to estimate adjusted mean changes from baseline in QLQ-C30 scores. Cumulative distribution function (CDF) plots of EORTC QLQ-C30 change scores from baseline to Cycle 5 were generated to evaluate a clinically meaningful threshold of individual pt change, which was determined through anchor- and distribution-based methods. Results: Among 222 randomized pts, 208 (94%) completed the questionnaire at baseline and at least 1 on-treatment PRO follow-up. In multivariable analyses, there were no statistically significant differences in Global Health Status (GHS)/QOL between arms over time when adjusted for baseline score, ECOG status, and presence of liver or bone metastases. At Cycle 5, CDF plots indicated that 80% of all pts experienced an increase or no change in GHS/QOL scores; 50% of all pts experienced a clinically meaningful improvement. At Cycle 5, 80% of all pts reported a reduction or no change in pain score, and 90% of all pts reported a reduction or no change in dyspnea score. Approximately 30% of pts had clinically meaningful reductions in these symptoms. Less than 15% and &lt; 5% of all pts reported clinically meaningful worsening of nausea/vomiting and diarrhea scores, respectively, at Cycle 5. Conclusions: Treatment with BRG for CRZ-refractory ALK+ NSCLC resulted in improved GHS/QOL scores and reduction in pain and dyspnea scores, while rates for nausea/vomiting and diarrhea were minimally worse. These pt-level benefits support BRG as a promising treatment option. Clinical trial information: NCT02094573.

Design of ALTA-1L (ALK in lung cancer trial of brigatinib in first-line), a randomized phase 3 trial of brigatinib (BRG) versus crizotinib (CRZ) in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naive patients (pts) with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

TPS9098 Background: BRG is an investigational, next-generation ALK inhibitor with potent preclinical activity against rearranged ALK and CRZ-resistant mutants. In an ongoing phase 1/2 trial, BRG has shown promising intracranial and whole-body activity in ALK+ NSCLC pts with or without prior CRZ therapy ( Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1683-96). In an ongoing pivotal randomized phase 2 trial (ALTA) evaluating 2 BRG regimens (90 mg qd and 180 mg qd with a 7-d lead-in at 90 mg), BRG has shown substantial objective response rates (ORRs) and robust progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with CRZ-resistant ALK+ NSCLC, particularly at 180 mg (with lead-in), and acceptable safety ( J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:S612-3). Based on these results, the ALTA-1L trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of BRG vs CRZ in pts with advanced ALK+ NSCLC naive to TKI therapy (including ALK inhibitors). Methods: ALTA-1L (NCT02737501) is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial. Pts (≥18 y of age) are required to have locally advanced or metastatic ALK+ NSCLC, no prior TKI therapy, and ≤1 prior systemic anticancer regimen in the advanced setting. Approximately 270 pts will be stratified by presence of brain metastases at baseline and prior chemotherapy (yes/no) and randomized 1:1 to receive oral BRG (180 mg qd with a 7-d lead-in at 90 mg) or CRZ (250 mg bid). The primary endpoint is PFS per RECIST v1.1 assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC); secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response, overall survival, safety/tolerability, pt-reported outcomes, and intracranial ORR/PFS. The primary endpoint will be analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and a 2-sided stratified log-rank test after 198 events; 2 interim analyses are planned after approximately 50% and 75% of expected events. CRZ-treated pts may cross over to BRG (180 mg [with lead-in]) after BIRC-assessed disease progression. ALTA-1L was initiated in April 2016; 150 sites are planned in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. 97 pts were enrolled as of February 6, 2017. Clinical trial information: NCT02737501.

Activity and safety of brigatinib in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and other malignancies: a single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements are oncogenic drivers of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Brigatinib (AP26113) is an investigational ALK inhibitor with potent preclinical activity against ALK mutants resistant to crizotinib and other ALK inhibitors. We aimed to assess brigatinib in patients with advanced malignancies, particularly ALK-rearranged NSCLC. In this ongoing, single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial, we recruited patients from nine academic hospitals or cancer centres in the USA and Spain. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age and had advanced malignancies, including ALK-rearranged NSCLC, and disease that was refractory to available therapies or for which no curative treatments existed. In the initial dose-escalation phase 1 stage of the trial, patients received oral brigatinib at total daily doses of 30-300 mg (according to a standard 3 + 3 design). The phase 1 primary endpoint was establishment of the recommended phase 2 dose. In the phase 2 expansion stage, we assessed three oral once-daily regimens: 90 mg, 180 mg, and 180 mg with a 7 day lead-in at 90 mg; one patient received 90 mg twice daily. We enrolled patients in phase 2 into five cohorts: ALK inhibitor-naive ALK-rearranged NSCLC (cohort 1), crizotinib-treated ALK-rearranged NSCLC (cohort 2), EGFRT790M-positive NSCLC and resistance to one previous EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cohort 3), other cancers with abnormalities in brigatinib targets (cohort 4), and crizotinib-naive or crizotinib-treated ALK-rearranged NSCLC with active, measurable, intracranial CNS metastases (cohort 5). The phase 2 primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an objective response. Safety and activity of brigatinib were analysed in all patients in both phases of the trial who had received at least one dose of treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01449461. Between Sept 20, 2011, and July 8, 2014, we enrolled 137 patients (79 [58%] with ALK-rearranged NSCLC), all of whom were treated. Dose-limiting toxicities observed during dose escalation included grade 3 increased alanine aminotransferase (240 mg daily) and grade 4 dyspnoea (300 mg daily). We initially chose a dose of 180 mg once daily as the recommended phase 2 dose; however, we also assessed two additional regimens (90 mg once daily and 180 mg once daily with a 7 day lead-in at 90 mg) in the phase 2 stage. four (100% [95% CI 40-100]) of four patients in cohort 1 had an objective response, 31 (74% [58-86]) of 42 did in cohort 2, none (of one) did in cohort 3, three (17% [4-41]) of 18 did in cohort 4, and five (83% [36-100]) of six did in cohort 5. 51 (72% [60-82]) of 71 patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC with previous crizotinib treatment had an objective response (44 [62% (50-73)] had a confirmed objective response). All eight crizotinib-naive patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC had a confirmed objective response (100% [63-100]). Three (50% [95% CI 12-88]) of six patients in cohort 5 had an intracranial response. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events across all doses were increased lipase concentration (12 [9%] of 137), dyspnoea (eight [6%]), and hypertension (seven [5%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events (excluding neoplasm progression) reported in at least 5% of all patients were dyspnoea (ten [7%]), pneumonia (nine [7%]), and hypoxia (seven [5%]). 16 (12%) patients died during treatment or within 31 days of the last dose of brigatinib, including eight patients who died from neoplasm progression. Brigatinib shows promising clinical activity and has an acceptable safety profile in patients with crizotinib-treated and crizotinib-naive ALK-rearranged NSCLC. These results support its further development as a potential new treatment option for patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC. A randomised phase 2 trial in patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK-rearranged NSCLC is prospectively assessing the safety and efficacy of two regimens assessed in the phase 2 portion of this trial (90 mg once daily and 180 mg once daily with a 7 day lead-in at 90 mg). ARIAD Pharmaceuticals.

Activity and safety of brigatinib (BRG) in patients (pts) with ALK+ non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Phase (ph) 1/2 trial results.

9057Background: BRG, an investigational oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has preclinical activity against ALK-rearranged NSCLC and mutants resistant to crizotinib (CRZ). Methods: Pts with advanced m...

56 Efficacy and safety of brigatinib (AP26113) in ALK+ NSCLC: phase 1/2 trial results

56 Efficacy and safety of brigatinib (AP26113) in ALK+ NSCLC: phase 1/2 trial results