Safety Of Bevacizumab Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with temozolomide in the treatment of glioma a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Glioma is the most common malignant brain tumor in neurosurgery. Bevacizumab (BEV) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumors by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor and reducing tumor angiogenesis. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BEV combined with temozolomide (TMZ) in glioma, we performed a meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing survival outcomes between TMZ combined with BEV and TMZ alone as well as cohort studies were included in our study. The primary outcome measures analyzed were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A total of six randomized controlled trials and four cohort studies with a total of 2515 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis suggested that there were no significant improvements in overall survival, but the combination of TMZ and BEV prolonged progression-free survival, improved overall response rate (ORR), and increased the incidence of some adverse reactions, compared with TMZ alone. Subgroup analysis suggested sex, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) grade, MGMT gene status and radiotherapy combination did not affect the improvement of OS with the combination of the two drugs, and RPA grade did not affect the improvement of PFS with the combination of the two drugs. The combination of TMZ and BEV can improve PFS as well as ORR in patients and has no benefit on OS. At the same time, the adverse reactions during the combination of the two drugs were acceptable.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in neoadjuvant and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for refractory cervical cancer patients.

A platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for refractory cervical cancer (CC). However, the recurrence of disease and the occurrence of metastasis remain prevalent. We observed the long-term efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and CCRT in refractory CC. A total of 62 patients with refractory CC were enrolled in this study from January 2016 to December 2019. The NACT regimen included bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg), docetaxel (75 mg/m2), and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), administered tri-weekly for 2 cycles. The CCRT regimen included bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), administered tri-weekly for 2 cycles. A dose of 45-50 Gy was prescribed for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), while 30-35 Gy in 4-5 fractions was prescribed for brachytherapy (BT). Among the patients, 21 patients (33.9%) were at stages IIB-IIIB, 8 patients (12.9%) were at stage IIIC1, 19 patients (30.6%) were at stage IIIC2, and 14 patients (22.6%) were at stage IVB. Pelvic, para-aortic, supraclavicular, and inguinal lymph node metastases were discovered in 41 patients (66.1%). The median follow-up was 49.8 months (12.3-82.7 months). The median tumor volumes pre-treatment, after NACT, and before BT were 84.64 ± 53.15 cm3, 1.64 ± 13.15 cm3, and 0 ± 1.5 cm3, respectively. Complete clinical response (cCR) rates after NACT and EBRT were 35.5% and 66.1%, respectively. Four years after the diagnosis, the overall survival (OS) rate was 78.6%, the local region-free survival (LRFS) rate was 91.3%, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 70.6%, and the distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate was 81.4%. A total of 29 patients (46.8%) experienced grade 3/4 hematological toxicity, 3 patients (4.8%) experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicities, and none experienced grade 5 adverse events. Bevacizumab combined with NACT and CCRT significantly improved cCR and OS in refractory CC with acceptable toxicity.

The effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab in improving the efficacy of antiseizure medication in treating refractory epilepsy induced by stereotactic radiosurgery in meningiomas

Background: Refractory epilepsy (RE) increases rapidly after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but the reports on RE treatment are rare, with various methods and efficacy. In recent years, bevacizumab (BEV) has been widely used as it is effective in eliminating intracranial oedema and reducing radioactive damage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of additional BEV to RE after SRS in the real world. Methods: Seizure freedom and seizure response were defined as 100% and > 50% reduction in seizure frequency at baseline and 6-, 9- and 12-month follow-ups. The sustained seizure-free (SSF), sustained seizure response (SSR) was used to assess the effectiveness of BEV. The number of anti-seizure medications (ASM), seizure severity (NH3), and epilepsy quality of life rating scale (QOLIE-31) scores were compared before and 12 months after treatment. Results: Forty-one patients were included from January 2020 to December 2022. During the 1-year follow-up, 5 patients (12.2%) achieved SSF lasting 12 months, and 4.9% and 7.3% enjoyed SSF more than 6 months and 9 months, respectively. Twelve patients (29.3%) achieved SSR lasting for 12 months, and 19.5% and 24.4% of the study cohort achieved SSR more than 6 months and 9 months, respectively. Patients’ ASM, NH3, and QOLIE-31 scores significantly improved 12 months after treatment, and the adverse reactions were controllable. Conclusion: This study is the first to explore and report the additional use of BEV in the treatment of RE after SRS in meningiomas. BEV was effective and safe in the treatment of SRS-induced RE.

Advances in the use of bevacizumab for the treatment of respiratory papilloma

Respiratory papilloma is a relatively common benign tumor of the respiratory tract, and a few patients may develop malignant changes. The disease has an insidious onset and lacks specific clinical manifestations, and its manifestations are closely related to the growth mode, location and size of the tumor. It can involve multiple parts, such as the larynx, trachea, bronchus, and lung parenchyma, which cause coughing, hoarseness, dysphonia, and, in severe cases, may lead to obstruction of the respiratory tract. At present, the treatment of respiratory papilloma lacks standardization, and there is no effective method to cure the disease. Surgery remains the main treatment for alleviating patients' symptoms and preventing airway obstruction. However, due to the high recurrence rate of respiratory papilloma, multiple surgeries are often needed, which reduces the quality of life of patients and increases their disease burden and economic burden. Bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor-binding antibody inhibitor, is a promising adjuvant treatment modality that shows good potential for reducing symptoms and the frequency of surgery. This article aimed to review the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for the treatment of respiratory papilloma and discuss the differences and efficacy of the systemic application and intralesional injection of bevacizumab for the treatment of respiratory papilloma.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and platinum‑based chemotherapy as neoadjuvant regimen for stage‑IIIA non‑squamous non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

Bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy provides modest benefits in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while its application as a neoadjuvant regimen has yet to be validated. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage-IIIA non-squamous NSCLC. Data from 110 patients with stage-IIIA non-squamous NSCLC with negative driver genes, who received neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (n=50) or neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy alone (n=60), and tumor resection, were retrospectively reviewed in the current study. In addition, the data on pathological response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were obtained. The results demonstrated that neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy did not significantly increase the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (18.0 vs. 8.3%; P=0.130). However, neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly increased the rates of DFS (P=0.007) and OS (P=0.049) compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Adjustments were then performed using multivariate logistic or Cox regression analyses, which demonstrated that neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone only significantly independently prolonged DFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.251; P=0.042], but did not significantly affect pCR (odds ratio=2.897; P=0.117) or OS (HR=0.297; P=0.158). Furthermore, no significant differences were demonstrated between the number of adverse events in patients receiving neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in comparison with those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (all P>0.05). In conclusion, neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy was only associated with a significant improvement in the rate of DFS, but showed limited efficacy in improving pCR and OS rates in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with stage-IIIA non-squamous NSCLC. Therefore, a larger sample size and randomized controlled studies are needed for further validation of the findings of the present study.

Bevacizumab combination therapy versus standard chemotherapy for ovarian cancer in shorter and longer followup duration: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

e23296 Background: Bevacizumab is an anti-angiogenesis drug commonly added to standard chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of ovarian cancer. However, its comparative efficacy and safety in shorter and longer followup duration leaves a research gap that needs to be addressed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with ovarian cancer in shorter and longer follow up duration. Methods: We searched Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Google Scholar for all phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that administered bevacizumab to women with ovarian cancer. Review Manager 5.4 was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We assessed the quality of included studies using version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2). Results: After screening the titles, abstracts, and full texts, we included nine RCTs in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Four RCTs had low risk of bias while five had some concerns. Bevacizumab was associated with a progression free survival benefit for < 36 months (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.76, p < 0.0001, I2= 90%) and > 36 months (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.80, p < 0.0001, I2= 80%), and an overall survival benefit for < 36 months (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.98, p = 0.02, I2= 0%) but not for > 36 months (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.09, p = 0.77, I2= 30%). There was no difference in deaths between intervention and control groups < 36 months (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.04, p = 0.26, I2= 10%) or > 36 months (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.06, p = 0.50, I2= 0%). Bevacizumab reduced disease progression < 36 months (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92, p = 0.0008, I2= 82%) but not at > 36 months (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.19, p = 0.30, I2= 94%). The adverse events reported with Bevacizumab use included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukocytopenia, anemia, hypertension, bleeding or hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal, cardiac, and dermatological adverse events. Conclusions: Bevacizumab may improve progression free survival within and after 36 months, overall survival within 36 months, and reduce disease progression within 36 months. Future studies should explore the long-term effectiveness of bevacizumab in diverse patient populations and focus on individual patient-tailored treatment approaches to optimize outcomes.

The Safety and Effectiveness of Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Unresectable Metastases: A Real-Life Study From the South of Morocco.

Background Colorectal cancer constitutes a significant public health challenge, despite remarkable strides made in the last two decades, particularly in the medical management of metastatic stages. Notable progress has been achieved through targeted therapies such as anti-epidermal growth factor receptors or anti-angiogenic antibodies, as well as advancements in surgical approaches for hepatic metastases. This study seeks to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in individuals with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methodology This is an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study of all patients who were followed up for metastatic colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases and were treated with bevacizumab in combination with standard chemotherapy from January 2010 until December 2019 in the medical oncology department of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Souss-Massa of Agadir. Results Of the total 162 cases, 117 (72%) had metastatic disease, and 45 (28%) progressed to metastatic disease after initial treatment. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range = 23-79 years) with a sex ratio of 1.1 (M/F). The tumor was located in the left colon in 135 (83.3%)patients. The results represented adenocarcinoma in 137 (84.6)cases and mucinous subtype in 23 (14.19) cases. The three most common sites of metastasis were the liver (99, 61.1), peritoneum (67, 41.3), and lung (33, 20.3). In the first line, allpatients received bi-chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, i.e., fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin in 34 (20.9%) patients; capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in 88 (54.3%) patients; leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan in 17 (10.4%) patients; andcapecitabine plusirinotecan in 23 (14.1%) patients. Response after first-line treatment was progression in 74 (45.7) cases, stability in 42 (25.9) cases, partial response in 35(21.6) cases, and complete response in 11 (6.8) cases. Nine (6%) patients were able to benefit from surgical resection of metastatic lesions. Overall, 77 (47%)patients received second-line chemotherapy, i.e., 5-FU with irinotecan in 40 (51.8%)cases or with oxaliplatin in 30(38.8%) cases. Two patients developed undesirable side effects under bevacizumab (hypertension). The median progression-free survival and median overall survival of the study cohort were 9 months and 14 months, respectively. Nevertheless, patients who underwent primary tumor resection (p = 0.048), those with right‑sided tumors (p = 0.022), those who received a higher number of treatment cycles (p = 0.020), and those who received maintenance treatment (p = 0.001) had a longer median overall survival. Conclusions Chemotherapy combination with bevacizumab is considered as the cornerstone of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment in our region. With the new healthcare and social security systems, easier access to expensive treatments and molecular pathology tests is currently available. It is important to highlight that real-world data can offer valuable insights into the daily clinical practice of medical oncology.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Aim: To investigate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Materials & methods: The data of patients who received at least two cycles of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy were retrospectively recorded. Results: The median age of 51 patients was 56 (range: 33-75) years. The complete response rate was 10.4%and thepartial response rate was 43.7%. The objective response rate was 54.1%. Median progression-free survival was 15.9months (95% CI: 9.1-22.6)and median overall survival was 42.5months (95% CI: 37.2-47.8). Conclusion: Bevacizumab with chemotherapy is an effective option for treating recurrent ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma.

Safety of bevacizumab and olaparib as frontline maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian cancer: expert review for clinical practice.

Olaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, in combination with the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab, is approved as maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer who have homologous recombination deficient tumors with a deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA mutation and/or genomic instability based on the long-lasting survival benefit observed in the PAOLA-1 trial. Despite treatment with olaparib and bevacizumab showing an acceptable safety profile, the rate of discontinuations due to adverse events was relatively high, and toxicity related to this regimen may restrict its clinical use. Proper management of olaparib/bevacizumab-related adverse events is important for the improvement of quality of life and maximization of the efficacy of maintenance therapy. Here, we summarize the safety results of the PAOLA-1 study, focusing on treatment discontinuation reasons and adverse event profiles. We sought to shed light on toxicity monitoring and prevention, providing concise recommendations for the clinical management of the most relevant side effects.

Five years of safety profile of bevacizumab: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance and randomized clinical trials

ObjectiveBevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. It has a wide range of clinical applications in various cancers and retinal diseases. The drugs entered the Chinese market by a large margin in 2017, and the user population changed to some extent. This study reevaluated the safety of bevacizumab through an analysis of the World Pharmacovigilance database (Food and Drug Administration Open Vigil 2.1) in conjunction with a comprehensive meta-analysis of RCTs.MethodsReal-world pharmacovigilance data originating from case reports were mined using Open Vigil and coded at the preferred term (PT) level using the Standardized MedDRA Query. Proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and reporting odds ratios (ROR) were used to detect safety signals. Eligible items were screened by searching PubMed, Wanfang, and Web of Science, and data were extracted for systematic review and meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 software.ResultsAnalysis of the drug pharmacovigilance database revealed that the most significant PRRs were limb decortication syndrome (PRR = 2926), stomal varices (PRR = 549), anastomotic (PRR = 457) and ureteral fistula (PRR = 406). Most safety signals at the PT level emerged as various types of injuries, toxicities, operational complications, systemic diseases, various reactions at the administration site, hematological and lymphatic disorders, and gastrointestinal disorders. Adverse reactions such as nasal septal perforation (PRR = 47.502), necrotizing fasciitis (PRR = 20.261), and hypertensive encephalopathy (PRR = 18.288) listed as rare in drug specifications should not be ignored with a high signal in the real world. A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis, and the overall risk of adverse reactions following bevacizumab administration was relatively low, indicating a good safety profile (HR = 1.19, 95% CI:0.85 ~ 1.65, p = 0.32).ConclusionThe frequent adverse reactions of bevacizumab occurring in the real world are consistent with the data provided in RCTs and drug specifications. However, adverse reactions such as nasal septum perforation, necrotizing fasciitis, hypertensive encephalopathy and so on, listed as rare in drug specifications, may have a high signal of correlation in the real world, which all requires active monitoring and timely adjustment of bevacizumab posology during its clinical use.

First-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer or primary peritoneal cancer: a phase III randomized controlled trial.

First-line bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) is approved for stage III/IV ovarian cancer treatment following initial surgical resection, based on global phase III GOG-0218 and ICON7 trials. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab + CP as first-line ovarian cancer therapy in Chinese patients. Patients with newly diagnosed, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer post-primary surgery were randomized 1:1 to receive 6 cycles of CP with bevacizumab/placebo, followed by bevacizumab/placebo maintenance until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Stratification factors were FIGO stage and debulking status (stage III optimally debulked vs stage III suboptimally debulked vs stage IV) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1 or 2). Of randomized patients, 51 received bevacizumab + CP and 49 received placebo + CP. Median PFS was 22.6 months with bevacizumab + CP (95% confidence interval [CI]=18.6, not estimable) and 12.3 months (95% CI=9.5, 15.0) with placebo + CP (stratified hazard ratio=0.30; 95% CI=0.17, 0.53). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 46 of 49 (94%) patients receiving bevacizumab + CP, and 34 of 50 (68%) receiving placebo + CP. Bevacizumab + CP showed clinically meaningful improvement in PFS vs placebo + CP, consistent with GOG-0218 results. Safety data were aligned with the known bevacizumab safety profile. These results support first-line bevacizumab + CP therapy in Chinese patients with ovarian cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635489.

Efficacy of bevacizumab combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced metastatic gastric cancer.

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced metastatic gastric cancer, providing insights for treatment decisions. We conducted a single-center retrospective study involving patients with metastatic gastric cancer treated with apatinib, with or without bevacizumab, between August 2018 and April 2021 at Nanchang Medical College. Data on efficacy, adverse events, response rates, and quality of life were collected and compared. No significant differences were observed in complete remission, partial response, stable disease, disease progression, objective response rate, or disease control rate between the groups (all P>0.05). The median progression-free survival was 9.23 months in the control group and 9.94 months in the observation group (P=0.587). Median overall survival (OS) was 19.64 months in the control group and 26.44 months in the observation group (P=0.187). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified combination therapy with apatinib and bevacizumab, primary lesion resection, and number of metastatic organs as independent prognostic factors for OS. Scores for role, emotional, somatic, cognitive, and social functions were significantly higher in the observation group post-intervention (all P<0.05). In patients with advanced metastatic gastric cancer, combined therapy with bevacizumab and apatinib significantly improved OS, enhanced response rates, and increased rates of early and maximal tumor shrinkage.

Atezolizumab and Platinum Plus Pemetrexed With or Without Bevacizumab for Metastatic Nonsquamous Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

The combination of an antibody to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or to its ligand (PD-L1) with chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bevacizumab is expected to enhance the efficacy not only of chemotherapy but also of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies through blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated immunosuppression, but further data are needed to support this. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab administered with platinum combination therapy and atezolizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. An open-label phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 37 hospitals in Japan. Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without genetic driver alterations or those with genetic driver alterations who had received treatment with at least 1 approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor were enrolled between January 20, 2019, and August 12, 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either atezolizumab plus carboplatin with pemetrexed (APP) or atezolizumab, carboplatin plus pemetrexed, and bevacizumab (APPB). After 4 cycles of induction therapy, maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or with atezolizumab, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab was administered until evidence of disease progression, development of unacceptable toxic effects, or the elapse of 2 years from the initiation of protocol treatment. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. A total of 412 patients were enrolled (273 men [66%]; median age, 67.0 [range, 24-89] years) and randomly assigned, with 205 in the APPB group and 206 in the APP group of the ITT population after exclusion of 1 patient for good clinical practice violation. The median BICR-assessed PFS was 9.6 months with APPB vs 7.7 months with APP (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07; 1-sided stratified log-rank test; P = .92). According to prespecified subgroup analysis of BICR-assessed PFS, an improved PFS with APPB vs APP was apparent specifically in driver oncogene-positive patients (median, 9.7 vs 5.8 months; stratified HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98). Toxic effects related to bevacizumab were increased in the APPB group. The findings of this trial did not show superiority of APPB over APP for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC; however, this regimen showed a similar tolerability and improved survival relative to APP in patients with driver oncogenes. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT2080224500.

CTIM-25. EO2401 PEPTIDE IMMUNOTHERAPY + NIVOLUMAB +/- BEVACIZUMAB IN FIRST RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: THE PHASE 1/2 EOGBM1-18/ROSALIE STUDY (NCT04116658)

Abstract EO2401 expands existing memory T cells recognizing protein sequences from gut bacteria, which cross-react with tumor associated antigens (TAAs). EO2401 contains three CD8 HLA-A2 epitopes with mimicry to glioblastoma-TAAs (IL13Rα2, BIRC5, and FOXM1) and the CD4 epitope UCP2. Patients received EO2401 (300μg/peptide, q2weeks x4, then every 4weeks) with nivolumab (3mg/kg, q2weeks) in cohorts: C1a (n = 21, Ex2→EN; option for symptom directed low-dose bevacizumab [sLDB; 5mg/kg, q2weeks] as anti-edema treatment); C2a/1 (n = 23, EN); C2a/2 (n = 15, EN+sLDB); C2b (n = 6, adjuvant EN+sLDB); C2c (n = 9, neoadjuvant ENx2→surgery→adjuvant EN+sLDB); C3 (n = 26, EN+bevacizumab, q2weeks, 10mg/kg). EO2401/nivolumab+/-bevacizumab safety profile consistent with profile of nivolumab, and when applicable bevacizumab, except the addition of local administration site reactions which occurred in 39% of patients; 96% of events Grade 1/2 and 4% Grade 3. Immune monitoring (peripheral blood, ELISPOT, tetramer assessments) demonstrated expanded mimic specific CD8 T cells with cross-reactivity against the targeted human TAAs. In C2a/1 (83% tested) and in C3 (81% tested), 89% and 95% of tested patients showed expansion. Expansions were early (week 2 after starting EO2401), durable (up to 23 months), and robust (approximately 30% of all peripheral CD8 T cells were mimic specific in 3 clinical responders). In C2c, surgery specimens after two EO2401/nivolumab doses showed increased tumor T cell infiltration versus pre-treatment tumor in 5 of 6 patients. Addition of sLDB to EO2401/nivolumab prolonged treatment duration vs EO2401/nivolumab alone by reducing edema likely worsened by study therapy induced immune cell infiltration. Integration of bevacizumab with EO2401/nivolumab in C3 further increased efficacy in C3. C2a/1vsC2a/2vsC3: median treatment duration 1.4vs3.2vs4.8 months, disease control rate 22%vs40%vs88%, median PFS 1.6vs3.6vs5.5 months; median survival 9.0vs12.6vstoo early (C3 median FU 8.3 mo, survival ongoing up to 2 years). Further follow-up will be presented.

Bevacizumab Treatment for Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Serous epithelial ovarian cancer, classified as either high-grade (90%) or low-grade (10%), varies in molecular, histological, and clinicopathological presentation. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare histologic subtype that lacks disease-specific evidence-based treatment regimens. However, LGSOC is relatively chemo-resistant and has a poor response to traditional treatments. Alternative treatments, including biologic therapies such as bevacizumab, have shown some activity in LGSOC. Thus, the objective of this systematic review is to determine the effect and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of LGSOC. Following PRISMA guidelines, Medline ALL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase all from the OvidSP platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry were searched from inception to February 2022. Articles describing bevacizumab use in patients with LGSOC were included. Article screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal of included studies were completed by two independent reviewers. The effect of bevacizumab on the overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse effects were summarized. The literature search identified 3064 articles, 6 of which were included in this study. A total of 153 patients were analyzed; the majority had stage IIIC cancer (56.2%). The overall median response rate reported in the studies was 47.5%. Overall, bevacizumab is a promising treatment for LGSOC, with response rates higher than traditional treatment modalities such as conventional chemotherapy, and is often overlooked as a treatment tool. A prospective clinical trial evaluating the use of bevacizumab in LGSOC is necessary to provide greater evidence and support these findings.

Impact of Cardiovascular Comorbidities on the Effectiveness and Safety of Bevacizumab in Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Cardiovascular comorbidities are not contraindications of bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities before bevacizumab treatment on overall survival and cardiovascular safety in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. A 2009-2015 cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer aged ≥65 years administered first-line bevacizumab was extracted from the French healthcare reimbursement claims database. Baseline heart failure, hypertension, and venous/arterial thromboembolic events were identified. The 36-month overall survival rate was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on the 36-month overall survival using a time-dependent, multivariable, Cox proportional hazards model. The 36-month cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events, and the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on the likelihood of cardiovascular events were evaluated using the Fine and Gray model, with death as a competing risk. We included 9222 patients (56.4% male; median age 73 years). Two-thirds (66.7%) had baseline cardiovascular comorbidities. The median 36-month overall survival was 20.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.9-21.0] and 21.8 [95% CI 21.1-22.6] months in patients with and without cardiovascular comorbidities, respectively. Age ≥75 years, dependency in activities of daily living, radiotherapy, and another targeted therapy were identified as death risk factors, but not cardiovascular comorbidities. At 36 months, cardiovascular events had occurred in 60.2% [95% CI 58.9-61.4] and 44.1% [95% CI 42.3-45.9] of patients with and without cardiovascular comorbidities. Baseline venous thrombosis, female, three or more cardiovascular medications, another targeted therapy, and more than six bevacizumab injections were identified as risk factors for cardiovascular events. In clinical practice, cardiovascular comorbidities before administering bevacizumab to older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer impacted the cardiovascular safety, but not overall survival. Unless they limit functional independency, older patients with cardiovascular comorbidities should be treated with bevacizumab under close monitoring.

A pharmacovigilance study of adverse event profiles and haemorrhagic safety of bevacizumab based on the FAERS database

ABSTRACT Background Bevacizumab is used for the treatment of advanced malignant tumors; it acts by inhibiting angiogenesis. This study aimed to examine adverse events (AEs) of bevacizumab, especially hemorrhage, using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Research Design and Methods The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) were used to analyze the AEs of bevacizumab using FAERS registration data from January 2004 to September 2022. Clinical information regarding hemorrhagic signals was further analyzed. Results The number of bevacizumab-associated AE reports was 96,477. Our study found that 892 significant preferred terms (PTs) were spread throughout 25 organ systems. The system organ classes (SOCs) focus on general disorders, administration site conditions, blood and lymphatic system disorders, injury, poisoning, and procedural complications. A total of 2,847 bevacizumab-related hemorrhage cases were reported, and 37 hemorrhagic signals were identified. Hemorrhagic signals were focused on SOC levels in vascular, gastrointestinal, and nervous system disorders. Colorectal, lung, and breast cancers are the three most common malignancies associated with BV-induced hemorrhage. Conclusion The AE report from the present study confirms the majority of label information for bevacizumab, while also identifying new AEs. In addition, this was a large descriptive study of bevacizumab-induced hemorrhage.

Real-world Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab for Advanced or Recurrent Müllerian Cancer: A Single-institutional Experience.

The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for ovarian cancer have been reported in randomized phase III clinical trials. It is important to gather experience and data in a real-world setting. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for patients with ovarian cancer in a real-world setting. For front-line settings, patients with FIGO stage III-IV ovarian cancer treated using bevacizumab and chemotherapy after debulking surgery (Chemo + Bev group, n=79), in addition to those treated with only chemotherapy after debulking surgery (Chemo group; n=66), at our institute were reviewed retrospectively. For recurrent settings, patients with recurrent ovarian cancers treated with bevacizumab and any chemotherapy were reviewed retrospectively (n=65). In the front-line setting, the disease-free survival was significantly longer in the Chemo + Bev group compared with that in the Chemo group (p=0.021). Hypertension and proteinuria were found to be statistically more frequent in the Chemo + Bev group compared with that in the Chemo group (p=0.002 and p=0.004). In the recurrent setting, in platinum-sensitive patients, the response rate (RR) and the disease control ratio (DCR) were 78.4 and 94.1%, respectively. In platinum-resistant patients, the RR and the DCR were 28.6 and 57.1% respectively. The median progression-free survival was 18.3 and 7.1 months for platinum-sensitive recurrence and platinum-resistant recurrence, respectively. The major ≥ grade 3 adverse event was neutropenia. The present study provided encouraging real-world evidence of the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for ovarian cancer in real-world.

Efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal bevacizumab combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer and peritoneal effusion and the effect on serum lncRNA H19 and VEGF levels

Peritoneal effusion is a common event in ovarian cancer (OC) patients. LncRNA H19 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are implicated in cancer progression. The study evaluated the curative effect and safety of bevacizumab combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in OC patients with peritoneal effusion and the effect on serum lncRNA H19/VEGF levels. Totally 248 OC patients with peritoneal effusion were treated with intraperitoneal bevacizumab + HIPEC (observation group) or abdominal paracentesis without HIPEC (control group). The clinical efficacy, quality of life, and adverse reactions were evaluated after two treatment cycles. The serum lncRNA H19 and VEGF levels pre-/post-treatment were determined by RT-qPCR and ELISA. The observation group exhibited better clinical efficacy than the control group, evidenced by a higher partial response rate, response rate, and disease control rate. The observation group exhibited reduced physical/cognitive/role/social/emotional function scores and total adverse reactions. LncRNA H19/VEGF levels showed no significant difference between the two groups before treatment but were significantly downregulated in the observation group after treatment. Summarily, intraperitoneal bevacizumab + HIPEC has significant efficacy in treating peritoneal effusion, improves the quality of life, and reduces serum lncRNA H19 and VEGF levels in OC patients, with fewer adverse reactions and higher safety. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? The utilization of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as an emerging treatment option for abdominal malignancies has garnered the attention of numerous researchers over the years, which has significant clinical effects on peritoneal effusion in ovarian cancer and can control patients’ conditions and improve their signs and symptoms to a certain extent. What do the results of this study add? In this paper, we investigated the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal bevacizumab combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal effusion in ovarian cancer. Meanwhile, we compared serum lncRNA H19 and VEGF levels before and after treatment. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our findings may provide a clinically worthy method for the treatment of peritoneal effusion in ovarian cancer. The treatment method reduces serum lncRNA H19 and VEGF levels in patients, which provides a theoretical basis for further research.

Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Bevacizumab Plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Alone in Previously Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

To investigate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. In a phase II trial, 99 patients were randomly assigned to bevacizumab 7.5 (n = 32) or 15 mg/kg (n = 35) plus carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) every 3 weeks or carboplatin and paclitaxel alone (n = 32). Primary efficacy end points were time to disease progression and best confirmed response rate. On disease progression, patients in the control arm had the option to receive single-agent bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Compared with the control arm, treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) resulted in a higher response rate (31.5% v 18.8%), longer median time to progression (7.4 v 4.2 months) and a modest increase in survival (17.7 v 14.9 months). Of the 19 control patients that crossed over to single-agent bevacizumab, five experienced stable disease, and 1-year survival was 47%. Bleeding was the most prominent adverse event and was manifested in two distinct clinical patterns; minor mucocutaneous hemorrhage and major hemoptysis. Major hemoptysis was associated with squamous cell histology, tumor necrosis and cavitation, and disease location close to major blood vessels. Bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel improved overall response and time to progression in patients with advanced or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients with nonsquamous cell histology appear to be a subpopulation with improved outcome and acceptable safety risks.