Safe Sleep Recommendations Research Articles

Community partnership approaches to safe sleep (CPASS) program evaluation

BackgroundSudden unexpected infant death (SUID) continues to be a leading cause of death in infants in the United States (US), with significant disparities by race and socio-economic status. Infant safe sleep behaviors are associated with decreasing SUID risk, but challenges remain for families to practice these routinely. The objective of this program was to implement and evaluate a novel approach for an infant safe sleep pilot program built upon partnerships between hospitals and community-based organizations (CBOs) serving pregnant and parenting families in at-risk communities.MethodsCommunity Partnership Approaches to Safe Sleep (CPASS) was a prospectively implemented infant safe sleep program. CPASS included children’s hospitals partnered with CBOs across five US cities: Portland, OR, Little Rock AR, Chicago, IL, Birmingham, AL, and Rochester, NY. The program consisted of (1) monthly learning community calls; (2) distribution of Safe Sleep Survival Kits; and (3) surveys of sites and families regarding program outcomes. Survey measures included (1) site participation in CPASS activities; (2) recipients’ use of Safe Sleep Kits; and (3) recipients’ safe sleep knowledge and behaviors.ResultsCPASS learning community activities were consistently attended by at least two representatives (1 hospital-based, 1 CBO-based) from each site. Across the five sites, 1002 safe kits were distributed over 9 months, the majority (> 85%) to families with infants ≤ 1 month old. Among participating families, 45% reported no safe sleep location before receipt of the kit. Family adherence to nighttime safe sleep recommendations included: (1) no bedsharing (M 6.0, SD 1.8, range 0–7); (2) sleep on back (M 6.3, SD 1.7, range 0–7); and (3) sleep in a crib with no blankets/toys (M 6.0, SD 2.0, range 0–7). Site interviews described how participation in CPASS influenced safe sleep conversations and incorporated local data into counseling. Hospital-CBO relationships were strengthened with program participation.ConclusionsThe CPASS pilot program provides a new, innovative model built on hospital-community partnerships for infant safe sleep promotion in SUID-impacted communities. CPASS reached families before their infant’s peak age risk for SUID and empowered families with knowledge and resources to practice infant safe sleep. Important lessons learned included improved ways to center and communicate with families.

The risk of sleep-related death in an inclined sleep environment

BackgroundUnsafe sleep environments are the primary modifiable risk factor for sudden unexpected infant death (SUID). Despite this knowledge, products that deviate from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) safe sleep recommendations continue to be commonplace, such as inclined sleepers. Analyses to estimate risk among these products are lacking, perpetuating their presence in the marketplace. We present a method of comparing risk of SUID in an inclined sleeper to an AAP-recommended sleep environment.MethodsA case-control analysis using publicly available and previously published survey data was conducted for SUID events occurring between January 1, 2018 and April 12, 2019 (the date of the first inclined sleeper recall). SUID deaths were categorized as occurring in an AAP-recommended sleep environments or in an inclined sleeper. Exposure Odds Ratios (OR) are reported as the risk of SUID among infants using inclined sleepers relative to an AAP-recommended sleep environment.ResultsDuring the study period, 4,900,573 births and 4,363 SUID deaths occurred in the US. Control characteristics were similar between previous night users of an AAP-recommended sleep environment (24%) and inclined sleepers (3.8%). Inclined sleepers were associated with a 5-fold (OR: 5.1; 95% CI: 3.2, 7.9) increased risk of SUID among infants < 12 months compared to infants in an AAP-recommended sleep environment. This risk was greatest among infants ≥ 4 months (RR: 10.4; 95% CI: 5.1, 21.5).ConclusionsThis novel analysis fills a longstanding gap in risk assessments of inclined infant sleep products. More timely risk analyses may improve the safety of the marketplace.

Photos Shared on Facebook in the Context of Safe Sleep Recommendations: Content Analysis of Images.

Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) remains a leading cause of infant mortality; therefore, understanding parental practices of infant sleep at home is essential. Since social media analyses yield invaluable patient perspectives, understanding sleep practices in the context of safe sleep recommendations via a Facebook mothers' group is instrumental for policy makers, health care providers, and researchers. This study aimed to identify photos shared by mothers discussing SUID and safe sleep online and assess their consistency with infant sleep guidelines per the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). We hypothesized the photos would not be consistent with guidelines based on prior research and increasing rates of accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed. Data were extracted from a Facebook mothers' group in May 2019. After trialing various search terms, searching for the term "SIDS" on the selected Facebook group resulted in the most relevant discussions on SUID and safe sleep. The resulting data, including 20 posts and 912 comments among 512 mothers, were extracted and underwent qualitative descriptive content analysis. In completing the extraction and subsequent analysis, 24 shared personal photos were identified among the discussions. Of the photos, 14 pertained to the infant sleep environment. Photos of the infant sleep environment were then assessed for consistency with safe sleep guidelines per the AAP standards by 2 separate reviewers. Of the shared photos relating to the infant sleep environment, 86% (12/14) were not consistent with AAP safe sleep guidelines. Specific inconsistencies included prone sleeping, foreign objects in the sleeping environment, and use of infant sleeping devices. Use of infant monitoring devices was also identified. This study is unique because the photos originated from the home setting, were in the context of SUID and safe sleep, and were obtained without researcher interference. Despite study limitations, the commonality of prone sleeping, foreign objects, and the use of both infant sleep and monitoring devices (ie, overall inconsistency regarding AAP safe sleep guidelines) sets the stage for future investigation regarding parental barriers to practicing safe infant sleep and has implications for policy makers, clinicians, and researchers.

Early and consistent safe sleep practices in the neonatal intensive care unit: a sustained regional quality improvement initiative.

To increase compliance with standardized safe sleep recommendations for patients in a cohort of regional level III/IV neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in accordance with recently revised guidelines issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). A regional quality improvement (QI) initiative led by a multidisciplinary task force standardized safe sleep criteria across participating NICU sites. Universal and unit-specific interventions were implemented via Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles with evaluation of compliance through routine crib audits, run chart completion, and Pareto chart analysis. Following QI implementation, compliance with safe sleep guidelines for eligible NICU infants improved from 34% to 90% from October 2019 through September 2022. Compliance with early, consistent modeling of safe sleep practices nearly tripled in this cohort of regional NICUs. A standardized, timely approach to safe sleep transition demonstrated dramatic and sustained improvement in the practice and modeling of safe sleep behaviors in the NICU.

Manufacturers, media, and safe sleep recommendations.

Manufacturers, media, and safe sleep recommendations.

Inconsistency Between Pictures on Baby Diaper Packaging in Europe and Safe Infant Sleep Recommendations

To describe the level of inconsistency between pictures on baby diaper packaging and safe infant sleep recommendations (SISRs) in Europe. We attempted to identify all packaging of baby diapers sold in 11 European countries for infants weighing less than 5 kg through internet searches from July 2022 through February 2023. For each type of package, we extracted whether there was a picture depicting a baby, whether the baby was sleeping, and whether the picture of the sleeping baby was inconsistent with ≥1 of 3 SISRs: (i) non-supine sleeping position, (ii) soft objects or loose bedding, or (iii) sharing a sleep surface with another person. Data were aggregated at the country level, and a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to obtain summary estimates. The outcome was the summary estimate of the proportion of pictures that were inconsistent with SISRs. We identified 631 baby diaper packaging types of which 49% (95% confidence interval CI: 42-57; N=311) displayed a picture of a sleeping baby. Among those 311 packages, 79% (95% CI 73-84) were inconsistent with ≥1 SISR, including a non-supine sleeping position, 45% (95% CI 39-51), soft objects or loose bedding such as pillows or blankets, 51% (95% CI 46-57), and sharing a sleep surface with another person, 10% (95% CI 4-18). Pictures on baby diaper packaging in Europe are often inconsistent with SISRs. The prevention of sudden unexpected death in infancy requires action from manufacturers and legislators to stop parents' exposure to misleading images that may lead to dangerous practices.

94 Understanding Parental Behaviours Related to Infant Sleep Environment

Abstract Introduction/Background Sudden unexplained death in infants continues to make up a significant proportion of infant deaths. Despite wide dissemination of Canadian Paediatric Society and American Academy of Paediatrics safe sleep recommendations, studies demonstrate significant caregiver nonadherence to the recommendations. Few studies have examined caregiver reasons for low uptake of recommendations. There is an urgent need to understand these issues not only for individual providers counseling about sleep, but also for implementation of public health initiatives which attempt to target parental behaviour change. Objectives Our study aimed to explore parental perceptions, beliefs and influences regarding safe infant sleep environment and factors contributing to parental behaviour related to sleep environment. Design/Methods A qualitative study utilizing ground theory methodology was conducted with in-depth individual interviews of 14 parents of infants less than six months admitted to a large paediatric hospital in Toronto, Canada. Data collection occurred from November 2017 to January 2018, until a saturation of themes was reached. Interview transcripts were analyzed for recurrent and emergent themes and a coding structure was developed. Results Interviews with caregivers were completed, and a range of sleep locations and environments were described. Most caregivers reported that a bassinet or crib was the main sleeping location, but most infants were also placed in other locations at various times, including infant swings, couches, and bed-sharing with caregivers. Three dominant themes affecting decision-making about sleep location were identified: 1. safety, 2. feasibility and convenience and, 3. perception of infant preference and developmental needs. These factors were often present simultaneously in parental decision-making, frequently acting in opposition to one another. Caregivers’ methods of mitigating harm were often counter to recommendations, such as using pillows to prevent rolling. Information sources regarding sleep choices typically included family, friends, healthcare providers and media. Most caregivers placed greater significance on healthcare recommendations than the advice of family members. Conclusion This study identified key factors that impact caregivers’ decision-making regarding infant sleep. These results can inform healthcare providers counselling about safe sleep recommendations and public health interventions aimed at increasing adherence to safe sleep recommendations and reducing preventable infant deaths.

#sleepingbaby on Instagram: Nonadherence of images to safe sleeping advice and implications for prevention of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy.

Safe sleep of infants is important to reduce the risk of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI). The depiction of infant care behavior which is inconsistent with the safe sleep recommendations on social media has an impact on parental infant care thoughts, norms and behaviors. This study aims to determine the adherence of Instagram images to the Dutch safe sleeping advice. A systematic social media analysis on Instagram was performed using 22 hashtags and 9 accounts of Dutch companies or platforms related to infants. Images of sleeping infants were analyzed on consistency with the criteria: supine sleeping position, own cot or crib, sleep sack, and an empty bed. Based on 514 collected images, 5.9% was consistent with sleep sack use, 16.8% with an empty bed, 30.7% with an own cot or crib, and 67.5% with the supine sleeping position. For 311 images (60.5%), all four criteria could be rated, as for the others, at least one criterion was not clearly depicted. Only 6 of these images (1.9%) were consistent with all four criteria. Although Instagram images are probably not representative of regular infant care behavior, the exposure to these images that are mostly inconsistent with the safe sleep advice can contribute to the formation of norms, and therefore influence parental care behavior. Accurate communication of the safe sleep recommendations through social media is needed, and opportunities are described for preventive health professionals to engage more in this communication with their public.

Qualitative assessment of infant sleep practices and other risk factors of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) among mothers in Lusaka, Zambia

BackgroundThere is very little information on the beliefs and perceptions of mothers about SIDS and its related risk factors in Africa. To better understand parental decisions about infant sleep practices and other risk factors for SIDS, we conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) with mothers of infants in Lusaka, Zambia.MethodsFGDs involved 35 purposively sampled mothers aged 18–49 years. FGDs were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide in the local language, Nyanja. These were translated, transcribed verbatim into English, and then coded and analyzed using thematic analysis in NVivo 12.ResultsSix FGDs were conducted with 35 mothers in April-May 2021 across two study sites. FGD Participants were generally aware of sudden unexplained infant deaths, with several describing stories of apparent SIDS in the community. The side sleeping position was preferred and perceived to be safer for the infant with most believing the supine position posed an aspiration or choking risk to the infant. Bedsharing was also preferred and perceived to be convenient for breastfeeding and monitoring of the infant. Experienced family members such as grandmothers and mothers-in-law, and health care workers were frequently cited as sources of information on infant sleep position. A heightened awareness of the infant’s sleeping environment was suggested as a mechanism to prevent SIDS and smothering.ConclusionsDecisions about bedsharing and infant sleep position were guided by maternal beliefs and perceptions about what is convenient for breastfeeding and safer for the infant. These concerns are vital to designing tailored interventions to address sleep-related sudden infant losses in Zambia. Public health campaigns with tailored messages that address these concerns are likely to be effective at ensuring optimal uptake of safe sleep recommendations.

Safe to Sleep in Tennessee: A Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative.

Sleep-related deaths were the fourth leading cause of infant death in Tennessee between 2014 and 2018. In response, the Tennessee Initiative for Perinatal Quality Care developed a statewide quality improvement project, which focused on the demonstration and enforcement of a safe sleep environment in participating birthing hospitals to help families learn and practice the same at home. The project's aim was to improve the percent of infants audited for safe sleep practices (0-12 mo of age, cared for in participating newborn nurseries or neonatal intensive care units) that were compliant with the practices recommended by the 2016 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Participating teams were required to develop and implement safe sleep policies in compliance with the AAP recommendations, provide safe sleep education to staff and families, and complete monthly safe sleep audits. A tool was provided to assess whether each audited infant was compliant with safe sleep recommendations and any reason(s) the infant was not compliant. Teams met virtually for monthly huddles and semiannual learning sessions to discuss the development and testing of change ideas. The project teams were able to improve the percent of infants audited that were compliant with safe sleep recommendations by 22% over the course of the project. Audits revealed the main reasons for noncompliance were additional objects in the crib (49%, 329/671), unsafe bedding (27%, 181/671), and head of bed elevation (24%, 164/671). This project demonstrates the positive impact that a statewide quality improvement initiative can have on identifying and addressing barriers, sharing resources and education, and monitoring local and statewide data, which led to increased compliance with safe sleep recommendations in the hospital. Safe sleep education and monitoring should be ongoing as new parents and staff always need to be educated on safe sleep principles. · In 2020, 25% of all infant deaths in Tennessee were due to an unsafe sleep environment.. · Sleep-related deaths in infants are frequently preventable.. · State quality improvement projects are effective in increasing safe sleep compliance.. · State perinatal quality collaboratives can partner with their State Department of Health, local hospitals, and providers, to increase awareness, educate parents, and model a safe sleep environment..

Implementation of safe infant sleep recommendations during night-time sleep in the first year of life in a German birth cohort

The aim of our study was to assess the extent to which families followed recommendations, issued by the German society for sleep medicine, for the prevention of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) during night-time sleep. Analyzing longitudinal data from a birth cohort located at the University Children’s Hospital Regensburg in Bavaria (Germany), we determined data regarding the infant's sleep location, sleep settings and body position, and exposure to environmental factors. Data were collected in a structured interview after birth and by standardized questionnaires at 4 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year of life, respectively. The majority of 1,400 surveyed infants (94% at 4 weeks) were reported to sleep in the parents’ sleeping room during the first months of life. While the most common furniture was a bedside sleeper (used by 48%), we also observed a considerable proportion of families who regularly practiced bed-sharing and, for 16% of infants, the parents’ bed was the default sleeping place. 12% of infants were still put regularly in the prone position. The vast majority (87%) of the infants were breastfed at some timepoint and 17% lived in a household with one or more smokers. Although most parents implemented many SIDS recommendations, our analysis illustrates a considerable gap between recommendations and intentions after birth on the one hand and actual implementation in real life on the other. The number-one deviation from the current SIDS guidelines during night-time sleep was bed-sharing with an adult.

Safe Newborn Sleep Practices on a Large Volume Maternity Service.

Reinforcing safe infant sleep conditions in the hospital setting supports continuation of safe sleep practices after hospital discharge and should be considered the first line of defense for reducing risk for sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) at home. The purpose of this study is to determine knowledge of perinatal nurses, nursing assistants, physicians, and ancillary personnel about safe sleep recommendations and implementation of safe sleep practices on the mother-baby unit. Nurses and other members of the perinatal health care team in a level III maternity service were invited to participate in a survey about safe sleep knowledge and practices. An audit for safe sleep adherence was conducted on the mother-baby unit for 120 mother-baby couplets over 1 year as a process improvement project. N = 144 surveys were completed; most participants (86%) were nurses. They had high levels of knowledge about safe sleep recommendations and 74% reported making at least one safe sleep adjustment during one shift per week. The most common modifications at least once per week were removing baby from a sleeping caregiver (30%) and removing items from baby's bassinet (26%). Safe sleep audit findings revealed 32 out of 120 couplets were not fully following safe sleep recommendations, with most common unsafe sleep practice metrics being items in the baby's bassinet (18%) and bassinets propped up (8%). During the hospitalization for childbirth, new parents can learn about safe sleep practices from the perinatal health care team. Sharing information and role modeling safe sleep practices can promote continuation of safe sleep practices for the newborn at home after hospital discharge.

Racial and incident discrepancies in news media reporting of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID)

BackgroundRegardless of injury prevention and outreach efforts, there continue to be low rates of adherence with the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) safe sleep recommendations. Media is an important tool for parental education and may influence risk perception and caregiver choices. Due to media reports potentially serving as an opportunity for shaping social norms, caregiver education and injury prevention, an evaluation was undertaken to evaluate Georgia local news reporting of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) as compared to drownings, homicides, and firearm injuries. Our objective was to evaluate incident and racial discrepancies in Georgia news media reporting of SUID as compared to other pediatric injury deaths.ResultsDespite its high incidence, SUID was far less commonly mentioned in the news media, with only 1.9% (10/525) mentioned as compared to 8.1% of drownings (17/211), 11.4% (74/649) of MVC’s, 14.7% (59/402) of homicides between ages 1–18, 20% (11/55) of fire-related deaths and 25% (15/59) of homicides under age one (infant homicides). Across SUID and homicide, deaths of White infants were reported in the news media at 2.5 times the rate of Black infants.ConclusionDespite SUID being a leading cause of infant death, it is infrequently mentioned in the news media. When mentioned, the news media are more likely to highlight the deaths of White infants as compared to Black infants, though the incidence rate of SUID is higher in Black infants as compared to White.

When there is no air, the cradle will fall: A narrative review of tobacco-related content across infant safe sleep interventions.

Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID) from sleep-related causes is a leading cause of infant mortality worldwide. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is one of the primary causes of SUID attributed to one or more environmental or behavioral determinants surrounding safe sleep practices among infants. The focus of many interventions on mitigating sleep-related infant deaths have addressed visible determinants pertaining to bed sharing, safe sleep surfaces, and removal of blankets, toys and other choking or strangulation hazards. Tobacco reduction and cessation have not been at the heart of any infant safe sleep interventions although addressing tobacco exposure is one of the primary safe sleep recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics. To date, there has not been a comprehensive review published on tobacco-related components across safe sleep interventions to reduce the risk of SIDS and SUID as the basis to contribute towards decreasing the rate of infant mortality. This review synthesizes the best practices, strategies, education, and additional interventions centered on addressing tobacco exposure as a risk factor for sleep-related infant deaths. Ten peer-reviewed studies were identified between 1995 and 2021 and integrated into this narrative review. There were three cross-sectional studies, three campaigns, one multi-center case control study, two randomized controlled trials, and two group comparison studies. Strengths and limitations of each approach are delineated followed by recommendations for future campaign, research, program, and practice endeavors to account for the totality of pertinent modifiable risk factors that contribute towards heightened infant mortality from sleep-related causes.

Infant Safe Sleep in the District of Columbia: Better for Both.

Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) rates within the District of Columbia (DC) vary, with rates 3 times higher in certain geographical areas than the cumulative rate in DC and 7 times higher than the national rate. The majority SUIDs are due to unsafe sleep practices. Although safe sleep education and resources are available in these areas, the high sleep-related infant mortality suggests unmet barriers to infant safe sleep. We sought to investigate potential contributions to local infant mortality through focus groups regarding infant sleep practices among DC caregivers. In this qualitative study, caregivers were probed regarding barriers and facilitators of infant sleep practices. Data were collected until thematic saturation was reached, then coded. Themes were developed and revised in an iterative manner. Fifteen caregivers participated in three focus groups. Themes included sources of infant sleep knowledge, challenges for infant sleep, and motivators for infant sleep choice. All caregivers reported knowledge of safe sleep practices. Infant sleep practices varied, and included unsafe practices such as bed sharing, co-sleeping, and use of swings or bouncers for infant sleep. Challenges of adhering to safe sleep practices included infant needs, competing family demands, the overwhelming nature of newborn sleep, threats, and conflicting information. Motivators for infant sleep practices included better sleep, convenience, safety, tradition, and needs of the infant and caregiver. Although caregivers report knowledge of safe sleep recommendations, actual infant sleep practices vary and include unsafe sleep practices. More focused interventions are needed to address this gap between safe sleep knowledge and practice.

P035 Understanding cosleeping arrangements, motivations and satisfaction with sleep location in cosleeping mothers

Abstract Introduction Nighttime infant care practices differ across the globe. In western cultures, where independent solitary sleep is the norm, there is an expectation that parental presence at bedtime is minimized in favour of teaching children independent sleep initiation, maintenance, and resumption skills. In non-western cultures, parental presence at bedtime and overnight is the accepted norm. Despite and against current safe-sleep recommendations, rates of co-sleeping and bed-sharing are increasing in western countries. The purpose of this study was to understand motivations and satisfaction with mother’s choice to engage in co-sleeping. Methods Using an internet-based survey, this cross-sectional study aimed to understand mothers’ (n=3298) motivations to engage in co-sleeping (includes room-sharing and bed-sharing), and the satisfaction with their sleep arrangements. Results Quantitative analysis reported on the variability in co-sleeping arrangements, intentions, preference and satisfaction with the child (under 12 years) current sleep location. Qualitative analysis reported on parent’s motivation to engage in cosleeping and reasons for dissatisfaction with the sleeping arrangement. Discussion and Conclusion The results of the study overwhelmingly highlights the need for education and information for parents who want to engage in overnight proximal sleeping arrangements with their children. The study lends support to adopt risk minimization approach when providing safe sleep related information to parents. Findings will help inform clinical delivery of culturally appropriate and safe practices to ensure safe sleeping, and enable parents to make informed choices in relation to their children sleep location.

O68 - Addressing Caregiver Challenges with Inconsistent and Unrealistic Safe Sleep Messaging: a Safer Sleep Guideline informed by Risk Minimisation

Safe sleep messaging varies considerably in clinical practice and guidelines within and between Australian states and territories. Risk elimination approaches which attempt to enforce idealistic expectations of where and how a baby sleeps have been demonstrated to alienate parents. Risk minimisation approaches which support ‘safer sleep’ offer flexibility and practical strategies that are more likely to engage families in risk reduction and infant health promoting behaviours. This analysis aims to share safe sleep messages that parents identified as most challenging to implement and introduce the Safer Infant Sleep clinical guideline designed to address common barriers encountered. A cross-sectional survey of 3341 Queensland families with infants aged approximately 3-months, birthed April-May 2017. Data included family characteristics, infant care practices used and engagement with safe sleep recommendations. Qualitative free-text items explored challenges with current safe sleep recommendations. Of caregivers, 1033 (31%) reported difficulty with at least one recommendation. Infant sleep position and avoiding a shared-sleep surface presented the greatest challenges. Families experiencing challenges were significantly less likely to employ advice compared to those not reporting difficulty (sleep position: 198/473, 42% vs 2548/2837, 90%[p<0.0001]; own sleep space: (269/344, 78% vs 1331/2884, 46%[ p <0.0001]). Parenting strategies believed to be unsupported weren’t disclosed, reducing opportunities between family and health professionals to share information and inform safer strategies. A tiered approach to tailor interventions for priority families based on identified vulnerabilities has been designed to develop safer sleep plans for every sleep. Structured support such as the Pēpi-Pod® Program is included. Many families encounter difficulties in implementing safe sleep advice; these challenges negatively impact infant care practices. The Safer Sleep guideline provides families a voice for collaborative and informed decision-making and provides professionals a tiered approach to manage risk whilst recognising their clinical judgement and reasoning to meet the needs of families.

The Impact of Breastfeeding and Safe Sleep Mobile Health Messaging on Breastfeeding and Bedsharing.

Mobile health (mHealth) safe sleep messaging increases rates of safe sleep. Bedsharing is more common among breastfeeders. Advice to not bedshare may negatively impact breastfeeding. We compared the impact of safe sleep or breastfeeding mHealth messaging on bedsharing and breastfeeding at 2 to 5 months. This is a secondary analysis of mothers who initiated breastfeeding from a cluster randomized clinical trial of mHealth messaging for safe sleep or breastfeeding. A multi-ethnic sample of 1600 mothers was recruited from 16 US birth hospitals and surveyed at 2 to 5 months regarding the previous 2 weeks' breastfeeding and bedsharing practices. Data on 997 mothers who initiated breastfeeding were analyzed with multivariable generalized estimating logistic regression models to examine the association of mHealth messaging with infant care practices. Overall, exposure to breastfeeding versus safe sleep messaging was not associated with a difference in any breastfeeding at 2 to 5 months (69.3% vs 65.5%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.33 [95% confidence interval, 0.91, 1.94]). Women with shorter planned duration of breastfeeding who received breastfeeding messaging had increased odds of breastfeeding at 2 to 5 months (50% vs 31%; aOR 3.13 [95% CI, 1.47, 6.65]). Mothers who received safe sleep messaging had lower rates of bedsharing overall when compared to breastfeeding messaging (24.8% vs 35.2%; aOR=0.58 [95% CI, 0.44, 0.78]). In this large multi-ethnic US sample, receipt of safe sleep mHealth messaging was associated with lower rates of bedsharing without negatively impacting breastfeeding rates. Future research should focus on continued development of interventions to improve adherence to both safe sleep and breastfeeding recommendations.

Infant Safe Sleep Initiative in a Small Volume Maternity Service.

Despite the 2016 American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for preventing sudden unexpected infant death, there are approximately 3,400 sudden unexpected infant deaths annually in the United States. Modeling of safe sleep practices by nurses in the hospital influences parents' practice at home; however, safe sleep practices are not consistently modeled during the childbirth hospitalization. A quality improvement project was conducted to implement a safe sleep initiative based on the 2016 American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for nurses caring for hospitalized infants after birth. Evaluation included testing of nurses' knowledge, infant crib audits, and nurses' evaluation of the intervention. A significant improvement was found in overall nurse education scores. Crib audits demonstrated a significant improvement in the following elements: use of multiple blankets, swaddling of the infant, and parent teaching. Nursing surveys reported an increase in confidence to practice safe sleep recommendations and educate and redirect parents. Implementing a safe sleep initiative can increase nurses' knowledge, improve adherence to recommendations with modeling safe sleep practices, and increase parent awareness of safe sleep recommendations, potentially positively affecting adherence after discharge.

Infant Safe Sleep Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors by Physicians at an Academic Children's Hospital.

Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) is the leading cause of death for infants. Physician advice on safe sleep is an important source of information for families. We sought to evaluate the safe sleep knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of physicians by distributing a cross-sectional survey at a freestanding children's hospital. The survey included demographics, knowledge items, attitudinal assessment, and frequency of providing safe sleep guidance. Multivariable linear regression and logistic regression were used to evaluate associations between variables. 398 physicians were surveyed with 124 responses (31%). Females, those who received safe sleep training, and those who see infants in daily practice had higher knowledge scores. Physicians with higher knowledge scores had more positive attitudes toward safe sleep and provided safe sleep education to patients more often. Our study underlies the importance of education and repeated exposure in forming positive attitudes toward safe sleep recommendations and leads to increased provision of safe sleep guidance.