Sacroiliac Joint Degeneration Research Articles

Sacroiliac Joint Degeneration After Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion Surgery—A Comparative Study of the Number of Fused Segments and Sacral Fusion

In this study, we aimed to investigate whether multi-segment fusion or fusion-to-sacrum increases sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pathology compared with single-segment fusion or a non-fused sacrum. This study included 116 patients who underwent lumbar or lumbosacral fusion and were followed up for 2years. The patients were classified into single-segment fusion (n= 46) and multi-segment fusion (more than two levels, n= 70) groups and then reclassified into the non-fused sacrum (n= 68) and fusion-to-sacrum groups (n= 48). Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were used to evaluate radiographic parameters, and computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate SIJ degeneration. Low back pain (LBP) was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10). Baseline and postoperative values were compared using a paired sample t-test. LBP VAS scores significantly differed at 6months (single-segment fusion, 3.04±1.88; multi-segment fusion, 4.83±2.33; P < 0.001) and 2years postoperatively (single-segment fusion, 3.3±2.2; multi-segment fusion, 4.78±2.59; P= 0.094). There was no significant difference in SIJ degeneration, as assessed by CT scan, between the 2 surgical groups: 14 (30%) and 19 (27%) patients in the single-segment and multi-segment (P= 0.701) fusion groups, respectively. The LBP VAS scale showed comparable differences at 1 (non-fused sacrum, 3±2.18; fusion-to-sacrum, 3.74±2.28; P= 0.090) and 2years postoperatively (non-fused sacrum, 3.29±2.01; fusion-to-sacrum, 4.66±2.71; P= 0.095). CT scan revealed that 18 (26%) and 15 (31%) patients in the non-fused sacrum and fusion-to-sacrum groups, respectively, developed SIJ arthritis; however, there was no significant intergroup difference (P= 0.574). SIJ degeneration occurs independent of the number of fused segments or sacrum involvement.

Biomechanical Effects of Multi-segment Fixation on Lumbar Spine and Sacroiliac Joints: A Finite Element Analysis.

Spine fixation surgery affects the biomechanical environment in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), which may lead to the SIJ pain or degeneration after surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of the number and position of fixed segments on the SIJs and provide references for surgeons to plan fixation levels and enhance surgical outcomes. The intact lumbar-pelvis finite element (FE) models and 11 fixation FE models with different number and position of fixed segments were developed based on CT images. A 400N follower load and 10° range of motion (ROM) of the spine were applied to the superior endplate of L1 to simulate the flexion, extension, bending and torsion motion after surgery. The peak stress on the SIJs, lumbar intervertebral discs, screws and rods were calculated to evaluate the biomechanical effects of fixation procedures. With the lowermost instrumented vertebra (LIV) of L5 or S1, the peak stress on SIJs increased with the number of fixed segments increasing. The flexion motion led to the greater von Mises stress on SIJ compared with other load conditions. Compared with the intact model, peak stress on all fixed intervertebral discs was reduced in the models with less than three fixed segments, and it increased in the models with more than three fixed segments. The stress on the SIJ was extremely high in the models with all segments from L1 to L5 fixed, including L1-L5, L1-S1 and L1-S2 fixation models. The stress on the segment adjacent to the fixed segments was significant higher compared to that in the intact model. The peak stress on rods and screws also increased with the number of fixed segments increasing in the flexion, extension and bending motion, and the bending and flexion motions led to the greater von Mises stress on SIJs. Short-term fixation (≤2 segments) did not increase the stress on the SIJs significantly, while long-term segment fixation (≥4 segments) led to greater stress on the SIJs especially when all the L1-L5 segments were fixed. Unfixed lumbar segments compensated the ROM loss of the fixed segments, and the preservation of lumbar spine mobility would reduce the risks of SIJ degeneration.

Analysis of spinopelvic parameters in adult patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae.

Spinopelvic sagittal alignment is crucial for assessing balance and determining treatment efficacy in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Only a limited number of reports have addressed spinopelvic parameters and lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV). Our primary objective was to study spinopelvic sagittal parameter changes in patients with LSTV. A secondary objective was to investigate clinical symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with LSTV. In this study, we investigated 371 participants who had undergone medical check-ups for the spine. LSTV was evaluated using Castellvi's classification, and patients were divided into LSTV+ (type II-IV, L5 vertebra articulated or fused with the sacrum) and LSTV- groups. After propensity score matching for demographic data, we analyzed spinopelvic parameters, sacroiliac joint degeneration, clinical symptoms, and QOL for these two participant groups. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and EQ-5D (EuroQol 5 dimensions) indices were compared between the two groups. Forty-four patients each were analyzed in the LSTV + and LSTV- groups. The LSTV + group had significantly greater pelvic incidence (52.1 ± 11.2 vs. 47.8 ± 10.0 degrees, P = 0.031) and shorter pelvic thickness (10.2 ± 0.9 vs. 10.7 ± 0.8cm, P = 0.018) compared to the LSTV- group. The "Sitting" domain of ODI (1.1 ± 0.9 vs. 0.6 ± 0.7, P = 0.011) and "Pain/Discomfort" domain of EQ-5D (2.0 ± 0.8 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7, P = 0.005) were larger in the LSTV + group. There was a robust association between LSTV and pelvic sagittal parameters. Clinical symptoms also differed between the two groups in some domains. Surgeons should be aware of the relationship between LSTV assessment, radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms.

Hip-sacroiliac joint-spine syndrome in total hip arthroplasty patients

This study is designed to compare the extent of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration at total hip arthroplasty (THA) for two pathologies: osteoarthritis of the hip (OA) and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ON). We also assessed the prevalence of SIJ degeneration in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or degenerative scoliosis. A total of 138 hips from 138 patients (69 OA and 69 ON) were assessed in this study, including 66 hips affected by OA secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. The degenerative changes in the SIJ and lumbar spine were evaluated prior to THA using radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans, showing 9 instances of spondylolisthesis and 38 of degenerative scoliosis. The OA group exhibited longer duration from onset to surgery than the ON group. The OA group also included more cases with significant pelvic obliquity (3 degrees or more) and with significant increases in SIJ sclerosis and irregularities. Patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or degenerative scoliosis were significantly more likely to have SIJ irregularities. The prevalence of SIJ degeneration was higher in cases of THA for OA than for ON. This study also suggests the possibility of Hip-SIJ-Spine syndrome in THA patients with OA.

A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Different Topping-off Devices and Their Influence on the Sacroiliac Joint Following Lumbosacral Fusion Surgery.

Interspinous spacer (ISS)-based and pedicle screw-rod dynamic fixator (PDF)-based topping-off devices have been applied in lumbar/lumbosacral fusion surgeries for preventing the development of proximal adjacent segment degeneration. However, little attention has been paid to sacroiliac joint (SIJ), which belongs to the adjacent joints. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to compare how these 2 topping-off devices affect the SIJ biomechanics. A validated, normal finite-element lumbopelvic model (L3-pelvis) was initially adjusted to simulate interbody fusion with rigid fixation at the L5-S1 level, and then the DIAM or BioFlex system was instrumented at the L4-5 level to establish the ISS-based or PDF-based topping-off model, respectively. All the developed models were loaded with moments of 4 physiological motions using hybrid loading protocol. Compared with the rigid fusion model (without topping-off devices), range of motion and von-Mises stress at the SIJs were increased by 23.1%-64.1% and 23.6%-62.8%, respectively, for the ISS-based model and by 51.2%-126.7% and 50.4%-108.7%, respectively, for the PDF-based model. The obtained results suggest that the PDF-based topping-off device leads to higher increments in SIJ motion and stress than ISS-based topping-off device following lumbosacral fusion, implying topping-off technique could be linked to an increased risk of SIJ degeneration, especially when using PDF-based device.

The effects of topping-off instrumentation on biomechanics of sacroiliac joint after lumbosacral fusion

BackgroundLumbar/lumbosacral fusion supplemented with topping-off devices has been proposed with the aim of avoiding adjacent segment degeneration proximal to the fusion construct. However, it remains unclear how the biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) are altered after topping-off surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects of topping-off instrumentation on SIJ after lumbosacral fusion. MethodsThe validated finite element model of an intact lumbar spine–pelvis segment was modified to simulate L5–S1 interbody fusion fixed with a pedicle screw system. An interspinous spacer, Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM), was used as a topping-off device and placed between interspinous processes of the L4 and L5 segments. Range of motion (ROM), von-Mises stress distribution, and ligament strain at SIJ were compared between fusion (without DIAM) and topping-off (fusion with DIAM) models under moments of four physiological motions. ResultsROM at the left and right SIJs in the topping-off model was higher by 26.9% and 27.5% in flexion, 16.8% and 16.1% in extension, 18.8% and 15.8% in lateral bending, and 3.7% and 7.4% in axial rotation, respectively, compared to those in the fusion model. The predicted stress and strain data showed that under all physiological loads, the topping-off model exhibited higher stress and ligament strain at the SIJs than the fusion model. ConclusionsMotion, stress, and ligament strain at SIJ increase when supplementing lumbosacral fusion with topping-off devices, suggesting that topping-off surgery may be associated with higher risks of SIJ degeneration and pain than fusion alone.

Survey of equine veterinarians regarding primary equine back pain in the United States.

Back pain is a common complaint, clinical finding and performance limiting factor in sport horses. This study sought to gather current veterinary trends in the diagnosis, treatment and management of primary equine back pain in the United States. A 22 question survey was distributed electronically to equine practitioners through AAEP and ACVSMR listservs and through closed social media groups. The survey was open from April 20, 2022 to July 5, 2022. Responses were analyzed using Microsoft excel pivot tables. Ninety-seven survey responses were obtained and analyzed. Respondents reported the clinical signs most frequently relayed to them by the owner/rider/trainer of horses diagnosed with primary back pain were behavioral issues and poor performance. Most common diagnostic tests reported were radiography of the spinous processes, thoraco-lumbar vertebral bodies, and transcutaneous ultrasound of the thoraco-lumbar region. Most common pathologies reported were impinging dorsal spinous processes, degenerative sacro-iliac joint disease, and osteoarthritis in lumbar or thoracic articular process joints. In regards to impinging spinous process ("kissing spine") treatments, 72.2% of respondents recommended surgery only after non-surgical treatments failed, and 14.6% of respondents never recommended surgery. The majority (82%) of respondents reported some level of improvement in clinical signs of primary back pain with rehabilitation alone. To date, there has been no consensus or discussion about common abnormalities, diagnostic tests, treatments or management options for primary equine back pain in the United States. Results of this survey are a starting point showing current trends in diagnosis, treatment and management of primary equine back pain among equine practitioners in the United States showing 82% of practitioners using rehabilitation as a component of treatment.

Minimally Invasive Postero-Inferior Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Surgical Technique and Procedural Details.

(1) Background: Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion is the preferred surgical intervention to treat chronically severe pain associated with SIJ degeneration and dysfunction. (2) Methods: This paper details the ten-step surgical procedure associated with the postero-inferior approach using the PsiF™ DNA Sacroiliac Joint Fusion System. (3) Results: The posterior surgical approach with an inferior operative trajectory (postero-inferior) utilizes easily identifiable landmarks to provide the safest, most direct access to the articular joint space for transfixing device placement. Implanting the device through the subchondral bone provides maximum fixation and stabilization of the joint by utilizing an optimal amount of cortical bone-implant interface. Approaching the joint from the inferior trajectory also places the implant perpendicular to the S1 endplate at a "pivot point" near the sacral axis of rotation, which addresses the most significant motion of the joint. (4) Conclusions: Further observational data from real-world clinical use are encouraged to further validate this procedure as the surgical preference for minimally invasive SIJ fusion.

Lumbosacral zone features in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain are unique compared to controls and correlate with pain and dysfunction.

To compare the lumbosacral nerve distances (LNDs) and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) morphology in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) and control and examine their correlations with pain and dysfunction in the former. The sample includes 200 adult patients (ranging from 20 to 50 years old) referred for computerized abdominal tomography (CT): 100 individuals with NSCLBP (50 males and 50 females) and 100 individuals without NSCLBP (50 males and 50 females). CT scans were assessed for LNDs, degenerative sacroiliac changes, and joint bridging. Those factors were correlated to the outcomes of three self-reported questionnaires about pain and function (Oswestry, Fear-Avoidance, and Numerical Pain Rating Scale) in the NSCLBP group. Individuals with NSCLBP tend to have reduced LNDs from the sacral part of the SIJ compared to controls (males: right Δ = 5.8 mm, left Δ = 6.03 mm; females: right Δ = 7.9 mm, left Δ = 7.73 mm, two-way ANOVA, p < 0.01), with moderate significant negative correlations with all three questionnaires (-0.38 < Pearson's r < - 0.57, p < 0.02, i.e., reduced LNDs with greater disability and pain). The NSCLBP group had more significant SIJ degeneration severity that moderately correlated with two questionnaires (0.39 < Pearson's r < 0.66, p < 0.04, i.e., greater SIJ degeneration with greater disability and pain). In males, the existence of SIJ bridging strongly correlated with all three questionnaires (0.38 < Pearson's r < 0.78, p < 0.03), and in females, only the Fear-Avoidance Questionnaire and Numerical Pain Scale (0.29 < Pearson's r < 0.41, p < 0.04). Compared to controls, individuals with NSCLBP have reduced LNDs and worse SIJ degenerative changes that correlate with function and pain. • Individuals with nonspecific low back pain tend to have reduced lumbosacral nerve distances than healthy controls. This may be due to entrapments or inflammation of the nerves or surrounding tissues. • Individuals with nonspecific low back pain tend to have more severe degeneration of their sacroiliac joint than healthy controls. • The above findings significantly correlated with the scores of three self-reported questionnaires about pain and function, implicating that they may be of clinical significance.

An In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis of Contralateral Sacroiliac Joint Motion Following Unilateral Sacroiliac Stabilization with and without Lumbosacral Fixation.

Cadaveric biomechanics study. This study investigated the effects of unilateral sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fixation for fusion with/without L5-S1 fixation on contralateral SIJ range of motion (ROM). SIJ fusion raises concerns that unilateral SIJ stabilization for fusion may increase contralateral SIJ mobility, leading to accelerated SIJ degeneration. Also, prior lumbosacral fixation may lead to accelerated SIJ degeneration, due to adjacent level effects. SIJ fixation biomechanics have been evaluated, showing a reduced-ROM, but SIJ fixation effects on contralateral nonfixated SIJ remain unknown. Seven human lumbopelvic spines were used, each affixed to six-degrees-of-freedom testing apparatus; 8.5-Nm pure unconstrained bending moments applied in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The ROM of left and right SIJ was measured using a motion analysis system. Each specimen tested as (1) intact, (2) injury (left), (3) L5-S1 fixation, (4) unilateral stabilization (left), (5) unilateral stabilization+L5-S1 fixation, (6) bilateral stabilization, and (7) bilateral stabilization+L5-S1 fixation. Both left-sided iliosacral and posterior ligaments were cut for injury condition to model SIJ instability before surgery. There were no statistical differences between fixated and contralateral nonfixated SIJ ROM following unilateral stabilization with/without L5-S1 fixation for all loading directions (p>0.930). Injured condition and L5-S1 fixation provided the largest motion increases across both joints; no significant differences were recorded between SIJs in any loading direction (p>0.850). Unilateral and bilateral stabilization with/without L5-S1 fixation reduced ROM compared with the injured condition for both SIJs, with bilateral stabilization providing maximum stability. In the cadaveric model, unilateral SIJ stabilization with/without lumbosacral fixation did not lead to significant contralateral SIJ hypermobility; long-term changes and in vivo response may differ.

Sacroiliac joint degeneration in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and related risk factors: a retrospective study.

This study was performed to evaluate the degree of radiological sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). The related risk factors for SIJ degeneration were also investigated. We retrospectively analyzed the lumbar and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans of 303 patients with DLS admitted from January 2018 to December 2021. One hundred and fifty-six age-, gender-, and body mass index-matched patients without lumbar anomality who underwent lower abdominal or pelvic computed tomography scans were included in the control group. Sagittal parameters were measured on full-length lateral radiographs. Two protocols (Backlund's grade and Eno's classification) were used to assess SIJ degeneration. Univariate analysis and bivariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed to identify the factors affecting SIJ degeneration in patients with DLS. According to Backlund's grade and Eno's classification, SIJ degeneration was more severe in the DLS group than in the control group (P < 0.001). Multi-segment degenerative changes (P = 0.032), two-level DLS (P = 0.033), a history of hysterectomy (P < 0.001), lower extremity pain (P = 0.016), and pelvic pain (P = 0.013) were associated with more significant SIJ degeneration as assessed by Backlund's grade. The results of Pearson's correlation analysis showed positive correlation between the sagittal vertical axis and SIJ degeneration (r = 0.232, P = 0.009). The multivariate linear regression analysis showed that a history of hysterectomy was significantly correlated with SIJ degeneration in patients with DLS (r = 1.951, P = 0.008). SIJ degeneration was more severe in patients with than without DLS. We should take SIJ degeneration into consideration when diagnosing and treating DLS especially those who had undergone previous hysterectomy or showed sagittal malalignment.

Retrospective evaluation of quality of life in patients undergoing sacroiliac joint denervation with simplicity.

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is the third most common cause of low back pain. The treatment of SIJ-induced pain is often conservative. When conservative treatments fail, interventional treatment methods, such as intra-articular injection or radiofrequency (RF) denervation are applied. Recently, in addition to the success of this interventional treatment applied, increased patient satisfaction and quality of life after treatment have also gained importance. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate pain management and improvement in the quality of life in patients with SIJ pain who underwent RF denervation with the simplicity probe. The files of patients with SIJ degeneration on Ferguson X-ray, who underwent diagnostic intra-articular block for SIJ and had more than 50% reduction in pain were screened, and 38 cases in which simplicity RF neurotomy was applied were identified. The age, sex, and numerical rating scale (NRS) and short form (SF)-36 scores of the remaining 30 patients were recorded before and at 6 months after the procedure. There was a statistically significant decrease in NRS between the pre-procedure and post-procedure (6-month) values. The decrease in NRS did not significantly differ according to sex. A statistically significant improvement in all the domains of SF-36 in the post-procedure period compared to the pre-procedure period. There was no significant sex-related difference in the improvement of the SF-36 domains, except for the emotional role functioning domain, for which the scores were significantly higher in women than in men. In patients with SIJ pain who positively respond to steroid injection, the application of Simplicity III achieves long-term pain management and increases patient comfort and satisfaction pain without any complications.

A unicentric retrospective study of 139 fusion cases using triangular titanium implants for the treatment of sacroiliac joint degeneration syndrome

A unicentric retrospective study of 139 fusion cases using triangular titanium implants for the treatment of sacroiliac joint degeneration syndrome

The degenerative changes of the sacroiliac joint after S2 alar-iliac screw placement.

The goal of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes and risk factors for the progression of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration and bone formation after S2 alar-iliac screw (S2AIS) insertion. Using preoperative and follow-up CT scan findings (median follow-up 26 months, range 16-43 months), the authors retrospectively studied 100 SIJs in 50 patients who underwent S2AIS placement. The authors measured the progression of SIJ degeneration and bone formation after S2AIS insertion, postoperative new-onset SIJ pain, S2AIS-related reoperation, and instrumentation failures. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression modeling was performed to clarify the risk factors associated with the progression of SIJ degeneration. Significant progression of SIJ degeneration was observed in 10% of the group with preoperative SIJ degeneration (p = 0.01). Bone formation was observed in 6.9% of joints. None of the patients with these radiographic changes had new-onset SIJ pain or underwent reoperation related to instrumentation failures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative SIJ degeneration (p < 0.01) and a young age at surgery (p = 0.03) significantly affected the progression of SIJ degeneration. The progression of SIJ degeneration and bone formation neither led to major screw-related complications nor affected the postoperative clinical course during the median follow-up period of 26 months. Although S2AIS insertion is a safe procedure for most patients, the results of this study suggested that preoperative degeneration and younger age at surgery affected SIJ degeneration after S2AIS insertion. Further long-term observation may reveal other effects of S2AIS insertion on SIJ degeneration.

Unexpected Sex Differences in the Relationship of Sacroiliac Joint and Lumbar Spine Degeneration.

The relationship between degenerative changes of the sacroiliac joints and the lumbar spine on CT has not been studied yet. The aim of this analysis is to determine the nature of their association as well as the influence of fixed anatomical spinopelvic parameters on sacroiliac joint degeneration. For this institutional review-board-approved investigation, imaging datasets as well as electronic medical records of 719 patients without back pain from the clinical routine of our department of radiology were included. Age, sex, weight category (slim, normal, obese), parity in women and indication for imaging were noted for all patients. The presence of degenerative lesions of the lumbar spine (disc degeneration, endplate degeneration, spondylophytes, and facet joint osteoarthritis) was noted separately at each lumbar segment (L1 to L5). Sacroiliac joints were assessed for sclerosis and osteophytes. Fixed anatomical spinopelvic parameters were measured: pelvic radius = PR; pelvic incidence = PI; sacral table angle = STA. Correlation as well as regression analyses were performed; data were analyzed for males and females separately. PI increased significantly with age in both women and men, while STA decreased and PR remained constant; neither of them was associated with SIJ degeneration. SIJ degeneration correlated with disc degeneration (tau = 0.331; p < 0.001), spondylophytes (tau = 0.397; p < 0.001), and facet joint degeneration (tau = 0.310; p < 0.001) in men, but with no parameter of spinal degeneration in women. Lumbar spinal degeneration increased the risk of sacroiliac joint degeneration in men significantly (OR 7.2; 95%CI 2.8–19.0), but it was not a significant covariable in women. Fixed spinopelvic parameters have little impact on sacroiliac joint degeneration. The degeneration of the sacroiliac joints and the lumbar spine appear to be parallel processes in men, but are largely unrelated in women.

Robotic Sacroiliac Fixation Technique for Triangular Titanium Implant in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Surgery: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Corrective surgery remains a definitive treatment for adult spinal deformity, improving pain and disability. With these cases, instrumentation to the pelvis with iliac fixation is recommended. Whether iliac or S2-Alar-Iliac (S2AI) trajectories are used, sacroiliac joint pain and long-term sacroilitis can be common after long-fusion constructs.1-3 Sacroiliac fusion with triangular titanium implants during fusion can reduce back pain associated with sacroiliac joint degeneration,3 provides reduction in sacroiliac joint motion and stress when added to S2AI screws, and potentially enhances mechanical stability of fusion constructs.4 Here, we present a technique for placing triangular titanium sacroiliac implants (iFuse BedrockTM; SI-BONE Inc, Santa Clara, California) alongside S2AI screws using a robotic platform (Mazor X; Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Medtronic Inc, Dublin, Ireland). Navigated robotics allows reduction in human error with implant placement, and potentially decreased operative time/fluoroscopy.5-7 Key surgical steps include placement of K wires for S2AI and bilateral SI-implants, tapping, replacing SI-implant K wires with guide pins, placing S2AI screws, and finally placing the SI-implant. Final placement is verified with intraoperative fluoroscopy. The patient described is a 61-yr-old woman with worsening adult degenerative scoliosis, lower back pain, left leg radicular pain, and mild right leg pain who failed conservative treatment. Examination revealed diminished strength in both legs. Imaging was significant for moderate sigmoid scoliosis, discogenic disease, and osteoarthritis at all levels. She consented to undergo corrective surgery. Postoperatively, the patient experienced resolution of her leg weakness and pain. Imaging demonstrated appropriate positioning of hardware. Prospective studies on the efficacy of the SI-implant are underway.

An independent inter- and intra-observer agreement assessment of the Eno classification of sacroiliac joint degeneration.

Recently, a scoring system to grade sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration using computed tomography (CT) scans was described. No independent evaluation has determined the inter- and intra-observer agreement using this scheme. To perform an independent inter- and intra-observer agreement assessment using the Eno classification and determining gas in the SIJ. We studied 64 patients aged ≥60 years who were evaluated with abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans. Six physicians (three orthopaedic spine surgeons and three musculoskeletal radiologists) assessed axial images to grade SIJ degeneration into grade 0 (normal), grade 1 (mild degeneration), grade 2 (significant degeneration), and grade 3 (ankylosis). We also evaluated the agreement assessing the presence of gas in the SIJ. After a four-week interval, all cases were presented in a random sequence for repeat assessment. We determined the agreement using the kappa (κ) or weighted kappa coefficient (wκ). The inter-observer agreement was moderate (wκ = 0.50 [0.44-0.56]), without differences among surgeons (wκ = 0.53 [0.45-0.61]) and radiologists (wκ = 0.49 [0.42-0.57]). The agreement evaluating the presence of gas was also moderate (κ = 0.45 [0.35-0.54]), but radiologists obtained better agreement (κ = 0.61 [0.48-0.72]) than surgeons (κ = 0.29 [0.18-0.39]). The intra-observer agreement using the classification was substantial (wκ = 0.79 [0.76-0.82]), without differences comparing surgeons (wκ = 0.75 [0.70-0.80]) and radiologists (wκ = 0.83 [0.79-0.87]). The intra-rater agreement evaluating gas was substantial (κ = 0.77 [0.72-0.82]), without differences between surgeons (κ = 0.71 [0.63-0.78]) and radiologists (κ = 0.84 [0.78-0.90]). Given the only moderate agreement obtained using the Eno classification, it does not seem adequate to be used in clinical practice or in research.

Lumbar Disc Herniation is a Nonnegligible Factor for the Degeneration of Sacroiliac Joints

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) abnormality is a potential source of low back pain (LBP), therefore numerous patients receive various treatments because of the degenerative changes of SIJ. However, the outcome is unfavorable for patients because these morphologic alterations are common but not the origins of LBP. Previous studies revealed lumbar fusion and transitional vertebra increased the prevalence of degeneration of SIJ. Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common lumbar diseases, but there is no study regarding the relationship between LDH and SIJ degradation. The aim of this study was to investigate the severity of SIJ degeneration in patients with LBP with LDH. The relationship between degenerative changes of SIJ and LDH was also assessed. Retrospective observational study. This study was conducted in 2 medical centers located in southeast and midwest China, respectively. Lumbar and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with LDH (LDH group) from January 2016 to May 2020 were reviewed using a picture archiving and communication system. The control group was age, gender, and body mass index-matched patients with LBP without LDH. Patients underwent whole abdomen and pelvic CT examinations due to non-musculoskeletal disorders. Scores of SIJ degeneration were compared between patients with LDH and the control group. Differences in SIJ degeneration among patients with LDH with diverse characteristics, symptoms, and complications were also evaluated. Univariate and multivariate linear mixed model (LMM) was chosen to identify the factors associated with SIJ degeneration. CT examinations of 782 patients with LDH were assessed, whereas 223 patients were in the control group. The SIJ degeneration score of the LDH group and control group were 6.00 (5.00) and 3.00 (4.00) (P < 0.05). Age and whether patients suffered from LDH were included in the LMM, which involved all reviewed patients (P < 0.05). Regarding the characteristics of LDH, the patients with more herniated discs had more severe SIJ degeneration. The score of SIJ degradation in patients with upper LDH was significantly higher than the other patients with LDH (12.00 [4.00] vs. 6.00 [4.00]; P < 0.05). Similarly, more significant SIJ degeneration was observed in patients with LDH who had secondary lumbar spinal stenosis (10.00 [4.00] vs. 5.00 [4.00]; P < 0.05). The scores of SIJ degradation were significantly greater in patients with LDH with sciatica, numbness, weakness, and/or cauda equina syndrome. Age and LDH were identified as associated factors for more serious degeneration of SIJ among patients with LDH. The main limitation of this study was the retrospective observational nature. Hence our study described that SIJ degeneration was relevant to LDH, but the causal relationship was uncertain. Magnetic resonance imaging was not chosen in this study. The SIJ degeneration in patients with LDH was more serious than in individuals without LDH. SIJ degeneration was more significant in patients with LDH with more pathological alterations, symptoms, and complications. Age and LDH relate to SIJ degeneration. Therefore the diagnosis and selection of treatment for SIJ changes should comprehensively consider the coexistence of LDH.

Sacroiliac Joint Degeneration After Lumbopelvic Fixation.

Study Design:Retrospective Study.Objectives:Sacroiliac buttress screws (SBS) and S2 alar iliac screws (SAI) are used as distal screws in cases with long fusion to the pelvis. Distal fixation ends, whether exceeding the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), may affect postoperative degenerative changes in the SIJ. The aim of this study was to investigate SIJ degeneration after lumbosacral and lumbopelvic fixation, using SBS and SAI in degenerative spine diseases, respectively.Methods:This study included 70 patients aged ≥50 years with lumbosacral fusion (>3 levels). They were divided into 2 groups (SBS 20 and SAI 50 cases) based on the type of distal screws. Radiographical and clinical data were reviewed with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographical SIJ degeneration was analyzed using computed tomography; clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Questionnaire (JOABPEQ).Results:No significant differences were observed in patients’ preoperative characteristics between the 2 groups. The incidence of SIJ degeneration, including osteophyte formation (30.0% and 8.0%, p = 0.03), intraarticular air (75.0% and 16.0%, p < 0.001), and subchondral cyst (20.0% and 2.0%. p = 0.02) in SBS and SAI groups, respectively, at the follow-up, was significantly higher in the SBS group. Although SIJ degenerative changes were significantly different between the SBS and SAI groups, there was no significant difference in VAS and JOABPEQ scores between the groups at 2 years post-surgery.Conclusions:Lumbosacral fusion can cause SIJ degeneration, which is more frequent when SBS are used in fixation to the sacrum.

Sacroiliac joint degeneration is common in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis secondary to unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip: Factors associated with its severity and laterality

BackgroundThe etiology of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration has not been fully elucidated, and there has been almost no report on the relevance between SIJ degeneration and hip osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). We investigated factors associated with SIJ degeneration, specifically its laterality in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis secondary to unilateral DDH. MethodsWe included 152 patients with end-stage unilateral hip osteoarthritis secondary to DDH who underwent primary THA between January 2008 and November 2015. SIJ degeneration was classified (type 0, no degenerative change, to type 3, ankyloses) using preoperative axial computed tomography. SIJ degeneration of the DDH (shorter leg) and contralateral (longer leg) sides was compared; differences in patient demographics and radiological parameters between SIJ degeneration of type 0 or 1 versus type 2 or 3 for the shorter and longer leg sides were analyzed. ResultsSIJ on the longer leg side showed more degenerative changes (p < 0.001). Substantial SIJ degeneration or ankylosis (type 2 or 3) was observed on 62.5% of longer leg sides and 33.6% of shorter leg sides. Factors significantly associated with SIJ degeneration severity were percent hip subluxation and leg length discrepancy for the longer leg side and body weight and body mass index (BMI) for the shorter leg side. Patients with worse degeneration on the shorter leg side (9.9%) had significantly larger BMI and longer sagittal vertical axis, whereas patients with worse degeneration on the longer leg side (46.7%) had significantly longer leg length discrepancy. ConclusionSevere SIJ degeneration was common in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis secondary to unilateral DDH. Patients with worse SIJ degeneration on the longer leg side had more hip subluxation, whereas patients with worse SIJ degeneration on the shorter leg (DDH) side tended to have sagittal spinal imbalance and greater body weight with larger BMI.