Sacral Neuromodulation Testing Research Articles

Does choice of anesthesia during stage 1 sacral neuromodulation testing influence outcomes?

Staged sacral neuromodulation (SNM) testing has been shown to have a high rate of progression to permanent implantation for the management of voiding dysfunction. Stage 1 lead placement (SNM-I) can be performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) or general anesthesia (GA). MAC allows for interpretation of sensory and motor responses to optimize lead placement while GA only permits for motor assessment. However, patient discomfort and movement can make lead placement challenging during MAC. Herein we evaluate whether the anesthesia type impacts the progression rate to permanent implantation (SNM-II). A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent SNM-I in the operating room for wet overactive bladder between 2005 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of anesthesia used, MAC or GA. Clinical variables and progression to SNM-II were compared between cohorts. Progression to SNM-II was based on ≥50% symptomatic improvement during a 1-2 week trial period following SNM-I. Of 121 patients included in the study, 95 (79%) underwent MAC and 26 (21%) GA for SNM-I. No difference in the progression rate to SNM-II was noted between groups (MAC, 68/95 patients, 72%; GA, 19/26, 73%; p = 0.39). We also found no difference when comparing the GA group to the 26 most recent MAC patients (MAC, 20/26 patients, 77%; GA, 19/26, 73%; p = 0.48). Types of anesthesia for SNM-I did not affect rate of progression to SNM-II. The result lends support to the reliance on motor responses alone for lead placement during SNM-I.

Evaluation of the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of voiding dysfunction after endometriosis surgery

Pelvic surgery for endometriosis is associated with a risk of bladder and digestive sequelae. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) and voiding dysfunction (VD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in treating voiding dysfunction (VD) following endometriosis surgery. A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from women who underwent SNM testing for persistent VD after endometriosis surgery. The study included 21patients from a French tertiary referral center. Patient characteristics, lower urinary tract symptoms, urodynamic findings, SNM procedures, and outcomes were assessed. The primary outcome was the success of SNM treatment for VD. After a median follow-up of 55months, 60% of patients achieved successful outcomes, with significant improvements of VD and quality of life. Moreover, more than half of patients who required clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) before SNM were able to wean off CISC. Complications such as infections and paraesthesia were observed, but overall, SNM was found to be effective and well tolerated. Age and the interval between endometriosis surgery and SNM testing were associated with treatment success. This study adds to the limited existing literature on SNM for VD after endometriosis surgery and suggests that SNM can be a valuable therapeutic option for these patients. Further research is needed to identify predictive factors and mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of SNM in this context. MRI-compatible and rechargeable devices, has improved the feasibility of SNM for these patients. In conclusion, SNM offers promise as a treatment option for persistent VD after endometriosis surgery, warranting further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Cognitive impairment does not impact sacral neuromodulation implant rates for overactive bladder.

To evaluate the impact of cognitive impairment (CI) diagnoses on sacral neuromodulation (SNM) outcomes in older patients. We completed a retrospective review of all patients aged ≥55 years who underwent test-phase SNM (peripheral nerve evaluation (PNE) or stage 1) for overactive bladder (OAB) between 2014 and 2021 within a large multi-regional health system. Patient demographics, relevant comorbidities, CI diagnoses (dementia or mild CI), and SNM procedures were recorded. Logistic regression modeling was performed to evaluate the impact of CI on SNM implantation rates. Five-hundred and ten patients underwent SNMtest phase (161 PNE, 349 Stage 1) during the study period. The mean age was 71.0(8.5) years, and most (80.6%) were female. Overall, 52(10.1%) patients had a CI diagnosis at the time of SNM, and 30 (5.8%) were diagnosed at a median of 18.5 [9.25, 39.5] months after SNM. Patients with CI diagnoses were older, with more comorbidities, and were more likely to undergo PNE. Univariable comparison found no difference in implantation rate based on pre-SNM CI (85.4% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.16). Multivariable analysis identified PNE (OR 0.43, 95%CI 0.26-0.71), age (OR 0.96, 95%CI 0.93-0.98), and prior beta-3 agonist use (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.37-0.99) but not CI or dementia as independent negative predictors of implantation. Implanted patients had a median follow-up of 25 [12.0, 55.0] months. Explant and revision rates did not differ according to CI. Patients with OAB and CI diagnoses proceed to SNM implant at rates similar to patients without CI diagnoses. A diagnosis of CI should not necessarily exclude patients from SNM therapy for refractory OAB.

Infection Rate of a Prolonged Sacral Neuromodulation Test: A Large Retrospective Study

ObjectivesIt is estimated that 3.8% to 12.5% of patients develop a device infection during the two to four weeks of the sacral neuromodulation (SNM) test, leading to removal of the entire system. It is possible to prolong the test phase up to the clinician’s decision, particularly when benefits are unclear. The aim of our study is to assess the device infection rate in a prolonged SNM test. Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled patients who performed a prolonged SNM test (at least eight weeks) in the last five years (2017–2021). All procedures were performed using a standardized technique and the same prophylactic antibiotic protocol. In case of a clinical suspicion of infection, all components were explanted. Patient information (age at implantation, medical history of diabetes, metabolic syndrome, immunologic diseases, or chronic immunosuppressive therapy), surgical data (operative time, intraoperative complications), and infection data (timing of onset, symptoms reported, wound culture results) were recorded. ResultsWe enrolled 232 patients who underwent a prolonged SNM test (mean duration 65.5 days). A local infection that led to the removal of the entire system occurred in six patients (2.6%). The gluteal pocket was always involved, and in two cases, infection was also extended to the exit point of the extension wire. No significant correlations with clinical data were found. Infection occurred beyond four weeks in two cases, between three and four weeks in three cases, and within two weeks in one case. Intraoperative wound culture was performed in five of six patients, and Staphylococcus aureus (S aureus) was isolated in four cases. One culture test gave negative bacterial growth results. ConclusionsThe infection rate of a prolonged eight-week SNM test is low and does not differ from that reported in the literature for a two-to-four–week SNM test. S aureus remains the most frequent bacterium involved.

Video-urodynamics efficacy of sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic bladder guided by three-dimensional imaging CT and C-arm fluoroscopy: a single-center prospective study

To assess the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for neurogenic bladder (NB), guided by intraoperative three-dimensional imaging of sacral computed tomography (CT) and mobile C-arm fluoroscopy through video-urodynamics examination. We enrolled 52 patients with NB who underwent conservative treatment with poor results between September 2019 and June 2021 and prospectively underwent SNM guided by intraoperative three-dimensional imaging of sacral CT and mobile C-arm fluoroscopy. Video-urodynamics examination, voiding diary, quality of life questionnaire, overactive bladder symptom scale (OABSS) scoring, and bowel dysfunction exam were completed and recorded at baseline, at SNM testing, and at 6-month follow-up phases. Finally, we calculated the conversion rate from period I to period II, as well as the treatment efficiency and the occurrence of adverse events during the testing and follow-up phases. The testing phase of 52 NB patients was 18–60 days, with an average of (29.3 ± 8.0) days. Overall, 38 patients underwent SNM permanent electrode implantation, whose follow-up phase was 3–25 months, with an average of (11.9 ± 6.1) months. Compared with baseline, the voiding times, daily catheterization volume, quality of life score, OABSS score, bowel dysfunction score, maximum detrusor pressure before voiding, and residual urine volume decreased significantly in the testing phase. The daily voiding volume, functional bladder capacity, maximum urine flow rate, bladder compliance, and maximum cystometric capacity increased significantly in the testing phase. Besides, the voiding times, daily catheterization volume, quality of life score, OABSS score, bowel dysfunction score, maximum detrusor pressure before voiding, and residual urine volume decreased further from the testing to follow-up phase. Daily voiding volume, functional bladder capacity, maximum urine flow rate, bladder compliance, and maximum cystometric capacity increased further from testing to follow-up. At baseline, 10 ureteral units had vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), and 9 of them improved in the testing phase. Besides, there was 1 unit that further improved to no reflux during the follow-up phase. At baseline, 10 patients had detrusor overactivity (DO), and 8 of them improved in the testing phase. Besides, 1 patient’s symptoms further improved during the follow-up phase. At baseline, there were 35 patients with detrusor-bladder neck dyssynergia (DBND); 14 (40.0%) of them disappeared during the testing phase. Among 13 cases who had DBND in the testing phase, 6 (46.2%) disappeared during the follow-up phase. Of the 47 patients with detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia (DESD) at baseline, 8 (17.0%) disappeared during the testing phase. Among 26 cases who had DESD in the testing phase, 6 (23.1%) disappeared during the follow-up phase. The effective rate of this study was 88.5% (46/52), and the conversion rate from phase I to phase II was 73.1% (38/52). Additionally, the efficacy in a short-term follow-up was stable. SNM guided by intraoperative three-dimensional imaging of sacral CT and mobile C-arm fluoroscopy is an effective and safe treatment option for NB in short time follow-up. It would be well improved in the bladder storage function, sphincter synergetic function and emptying efficiency by video-urodynamics examination in this study.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. ChiCTR2100050290. Registered August 25 2021. http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation in patients with Parkinson's disease

The urinary disorders of the patients with Parkinson's disease are complex and have a negative impact on their quality of life. None of therapy is considered effective; whether drug or surgical. Sacral neuromodulation, recommended in other neurological pathologies such as multiple sclerosis, has never been studied in the patients with Parkinson's disease. The objective of our study is to assess the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the patients with Parkinson's disease. Multicentric retrospective cohort study, of 22 parkinsonian patients who underwent a sacral neuromodulation test. Epidemiological, clinical and urodynamic data were collected for each patient. A long-term effectiveness telephone survey was conducted. Twenty two patients with Parkinson's disease had a sacral neuromodulation test. 17/22 (77%) had Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease and 5/22 (23%) had Systematized Multi Atrophy. Clinically, the indication for the sacral neuromodulation test was overactive bladder in 68% of the cases. Urodynamically, detrusor hyperactivity is found in 12 patients (8 MPI, 4 AMS). Sacral neuromodulation was effective in only 7 patients (6 MPI and 1 AMS). Rather, the profile of the patient in whom NMS is effective is female, mature, and with PID. The long-term effectiveness of NMS is disappointing. Only 2 permanently implanted patients retained urinary benefit. NMS improves urinary symptoms in the patients with Parkinson's disease in 32% of cases. It fluctuates over time and loses its effectiveness in the long term.

Sacral Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

BackgroundNeurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) is a highly prevalent and disabling condition; nevertheless, standard treatments often remain unsatisfactory. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a well-established therapy for non-NLUTD, but there is a lack of randomized controlled trials to show benefit in patients with NLUTD.MethodsFor this sham-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial, patients with refractory NLUTD (and intended SNM) were recruited at four Swiss SNM referral centers. After lead placement into the sacral foramina S3 (rarely, S4), all participants underwent SNM testing. If successful (≥50% improvement in key bladder diary variables), the neurostimulator was implanted for permanent stimulation. For 2 months, neuromodulation was optimized using subsensory stimulation with individually adjusted parameters. Thereafter, the neurostimulator remained on or was switched off (1:1 random allocation to group SNM ON or SNM OFF, respectively) for 2 months, followed by a neurourologic reevaluation. The primary outcome was success, as defined above, of SNM compared with baseline.ResultsOf 124 patients undergoing SNM testing, 65 (52%) had successfully improved lower urinary tract function. Of these, 60 patients (median age, 49.5 years; 43 women) were randomly assigned to the intervention. After 2 months of intervention, the SNM ON group demonstrated a success rate of 76%. In the SNM OFF group, 42% of patients showed sustained SNM effects despite their neurostimulator being switched off during the last 2 months (odds ratio, 4.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.43 to 13.21; P=0.009). During the entire study period, there were 11 adverse events (6 dropouts; no dropouts during the intervention phase).ConclusionsSNM effectively corrected refractory NLUTD in the short term in well-selected neurologic patients. (Funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation, Vontobel–Stiftung, Gottfried und Julia Bangerter–Rhyner Stiftung, Dr. Urs Mühlebach, and the Swiss Continence Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02165774.)

57 - Infection rate of a prolonged sacral neuromodulation test (8 weeks). A single center experience

57 - Infection rate of a prolonged sacral neuromodulation test (8 weeks). A single center experience

Machine learning provides an accurate prognostication model for refractory overactive bladder treatment response and is noninferior to human experts.

The increasing wealth of clinical data may become unmanageable for a physician to assimilate into optimal decision-making without assistance. Utilizing a novel machine learning (ML) approach, we sought to develop algorithms to predict patient outcomes following the overactive bladder treatments OnabotulinumtoxinA (OBTX-A) injection and sacral neuromodulation (SNM). ROSETTA datasets for overactive bladder patients randomized to OBTX-A or SNM were obtained. Novel ML algorithms, using reproducing kernel techniques were developed and tasked to predict outcomes including treatment response and decrease in urge urinary incontinence episodes in both the OBTX-A and SNM cohorts, in validation and test sets. Blinded expert urologists also predicted outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated and AUCs calculated for comparison to lines of ignorance and the expert urologists' predictions. Trained algorithms demonstrated outstanding accuracy in predicting treatment response (OBTX-A: AUC 0.95; SNM: 0.88). Algorithms accurately predicted mean decrease in urge urinary incontinence episodes (MSE < 0.15) in OBTX-A and SNM. Algorithms were superior to human experts in response prediction for OBTX-A, and noninferior to human experts in response prediction for SNM. Novel ML algorithms were accurate, superior to expert urologists in predicting OBTX-A outcomes, and noninferior to expert urologists in predicting SNM outcomes. Some aspects of the physician-patient interaction are subtle and uncomputable, and thus ML may complement, but not supplant, a physician's judgment.

Sacral neuromodulation as treatment of non-neurological vesical emptying disorders

The goal was to evaluate the results of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in non-neurological vesical emptying disorders. From February 2010to October 2017, 28patients presenting voiding symptoms or a non-obstructive chronic urine retention without neurological cause have been operated for an SNM (test phase). The test was positive in case of decreased number of proper intermittent self-catheterization (SC) or post-voiding residual urine (PVR) of at least 50%. A 100% positive result meant the return to a spontaneous voiding without SC with a non-significative PVR (<100ml). The median follow-up was of 53.2±21.2 months. Twenty-four (85.7%) tests were positive, from which twenty-two (78.6%) were 100% positive. 16 (84.2%) out of 19 patients with SC had spontaneous voiding without PVR. The number of daily SC decreased from 4.6±1.5 to 0.4±1.2 in post-operative (P<0.001). The PVR was of 287.1±170.4ml vs. 30.4±48.6ml in post-operative (P<0.001). Fourteen patients (58.3%) underwent at least one chirurgical revision or a removal of material; mainly for loss of efficiency, end of battery, electrode migration and pain on material. At the end of the follow-up, 70.8% of the responding patients had their device still efficient. Results showed that SNM appears to be an efficient treatment of non-neurological emptying vesical troubles. Nevertheless, the re-operation rate was still significant. 3.

Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study From China

This retrospective study aimed to determine the effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) on neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) and analyze the predictive factors. From January 2012 to January 2020, 152 subjects with NLUTD from four medical centers in China received SNM test stimulation. Subjects were assessed via bladder diaries, postvoid residual volumes (PRVs) and neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) scores before and during the testing period. Patients who showed a minimum 50% improvement in symptoms through the SNM test phase were eligible for permanent SNM implantation. The pooled success rate for chronic urinary retention was 31.0% (40/129), which was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the rates for frequency-urgency (64.8%, 59/91), urinary incontinence (65.2%, 30/46), and NBD score (61.7%, 82/133). The results of the risk factor analysis showed that the urinary storage symptom was a statistically significant positive predictor (p=0.001). In conclusion, SNM is an effective and reliable method for treating NLUTD, especially in patients with urinary storage symptoms. Although not all of the symptoms in every patient can be resolve, SNM still might be a superior choice together with other treatment procedures.

Is a 50% improvement threshold adequate to justify progression from sacral neuromodulation testing to implant?

A ≥50% subjective improvement in urinary symptoms during sacral neuromodulation testing (SNM-I) is currently used as the indication for progression to second-stage implantation (SNM-II). While most patients will have successful SNM-I and proceed to SNM-II, deterioration in efficacy over time has been reported. It remains unclear if the durability of efficacy is related to the initial symptom reduction. We sought to determine if the degree of improvement after SNM-I is sufficient to predict long-term success. The records of all patients who underwent sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for overactive bladder were reviewed. Subjects were divided into those who reported 50%-75% improvement (Group 1) and more than 75% improvement (Group 2) after SNM-I. Differences in clinical variables and long-term device efficacy were compared between groups. Of 213 patients who underwent SNM-I, 137 underwent permanent device implantation. A total of 76 (55%) and 61 (45%) patients reported 50%-75% (Group 1) and more than 75% (Group 2) symptomatic improvement, respectively. With a mean follow-up of 46 months, 44% of Group 1 patients and 68% of Group 2 patients still had a functioning device providing the symptomatic benefit (p = 0.007). Univariate analyses identified the presence of stress urinary incontinence at baseline and having a more than 75% improvement after SNM-I as predictors of long-term functional success. Compared to patients reporting 50%-75% symptomatic reduction after SNM-I, individuals with a more than 75% improvement during SNM-I were more likely to maintain device efficacy over time. Additional study is warranted to determine if the improvement threshold for progression to SNM-II should be increased.

Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Sacral Neuromodulation (SNM) in Patients with Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (nLUTD): Over 20Years' Experience and Future Directions.

IntroductionSacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been used in carefully selected patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunctions (nLUTD) for over two decades.MethodsThe aim of the current work was to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the safety and effectiveness of SNM in patients with nLUTD (neurogenic detrusor overactivity, non-obstructive urinary retention, or a combination of both). For this purpose a systematic literature research was conducted using Embase (OvidSP), MEDLINE (OvidSP), MEDLINE In-Process Citations & Daily Update (OvidSP), MEDLINE (OvidSP) e-Pub ahead of print, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), NIH Clinicaltrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) between 1998 and March 2020, supplemented by a hand search.ResultsForty-seven studies were included in the systematic literature review. Twenty-one studies comprising a total of 887 patients were included in the meta-analysis of test SNM. The pooled success rate of SNM test stimulation was 66.2% (95% CI 56.9–74.4). Depending on neurogenic conditions test success rates varied greatly. Twenty-four studies with a total of 428 patients were included in the meta-analysis of permanent SNM. The success rate of pooled permanent SNM was 84.2% (95% CI 77.8–89.0). Among the identified studies, the most common adverse events (AEs) were loss of effectiveness, infection, pain at implant site, and lead migration with AE rates of 4.7%, 3.6%, 3.2%, and 3.2%, respectively. Limitations entail lower level of evidence (Oxford classification 3–4) of included studies, significant risk of bias, small sample sizes in some studies, the inclusion of retrospective case series, substantial between-study heterogeneity, heterogeneous patient populations, insufficient disease classification, and variations in terms of outcome parameters as well as techniques. Furthermore, long-term data are limited.ConclusionThis meta-analysis supports not only the benefits of permanent SNM for various nLUTDs but also high overall success rates, similar to idiopathic patients. Current data of the analyzed studies showed that SNM is safe for these patients. However, more vigorous studies and/or registries are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01650-9.

The Effect of Sacral Neuromodulation in Ambulatory Spina Bifida Patients with Neurogenic Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction

OBJECTIVETo assess the effect of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in ambulatory spina bifida patients with neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 29 ambulatory spina bifida patients with neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction who underwent SNM testing from July 2012 to January 2020. Clinical data and video-urodynamic parameters were collected and compared using the t-test and the chi-square test. The potential risk factors were considered by logistic regression analysis. P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTSIn the test phase, 21 patients (72.4%) achieved successful improvement of at least 1 symptom. The success rate for chronic urinary retention (26.09%) was significantly lower (P <.05) than that for urgency–frequency syndrome (58.82%) and urinary incontinence (56.25%). The mean neurogenic bowel dysfunction score decreased from 13.3±6.29 to 6.9±5.09 (P <.0001). The urodynamic evaluation showed a significant improvement in the mean maximum cystometric capacity, compliance, and maximum detrusor pressure (P <.05). Implantation was performed in 16 cases (55.17%). The analysis of the risk factors showed that chronic urinary retention was a statistically significant variable (P <.05). No complications were reported in the test phase. The average follow-up time was 41.19±33.06 months. Two patients changed to intermittent catheterization, and 2 patients changed to augmentation cystoplasty. CONCLUSIONSNM is effective for neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction in patients with ambulatory spina bifida, especially in those without chronic urinary retention. And SNM can also significantly improve the urodynamic parameters of these patients during the storage period.

Long-term outcomes of sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction: A 23-year experience.

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of sacral neuromodulation (SNM), and patient characteristics that may predict long-term success or complications. A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients who underwent SNM testing and implantation. Outcome results, resolution of symptoms, and device removal were reported. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of success. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors for device removal. Four hundred and thrity four patients underwent SNM test phase of which 241 (median age 48.0 years, 91.7% [221/241] female) had device implantation and were followed up for median [range] time of 4.0 (3 months-20.5 years) years. Multivariable logistic regression showed that male gender (odds ratio: 0.314; 95% confidence interval: 0.164-0.601, p = .0005) was independently associated with decreased peripheral nerve evaluation success. At final follow-up for patients who originally had device implantation, median (interquartile range) percent of symptoms resolution of all patients was 60.0% (0%-90%) and 69.3% (167/241) had SNM successful outcomes. Cox proportional hazards model showed no difference for time to SNM device removal with respect to patient age, gender, or diagnosis. 69.3% (167/241) patients had at least 1 surgical re-intervention. The most common reason at first surgical re-intervention was lead change only (26.3%, 44/167). SNM is a minimally invasive procedure with good long-term success rates. There is a high revision rate but overall, SNM has a good safety profile and excellent long-term outcomes.

Unilateral versus bilateral sacral neuromodulation test in the treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder: A randomized controlled pilot trial.

To compare treatment success rate in terms of improvement of bladder overactivity between unilateral and bilateral sacral neuromodulation testing. A multicentric, parallel, randomized, open pilot trial (October 2012-September 2017) was conducted. Participants presented primary overactive bladder resistant to first-line treatments. Patients were excluded in case of secondary bladder, pelvic, or neurological condition. Patients were randomized between bilateral testing (n = 28) or unilateral testing (n = 27), to determine the best functional response before final implantation. The primary outcome was the rate of patients presenting at least 50% of clinical improvement at 1 month on urinary frequency, number of urge incontinence episodes or number of urinary urgency episodes. Symptom severity, implantation success rate, uroflowmetry, device tolerance, complications, and quality of life were also assessed. Fifty-five patients have been included. The rate of patients presenting at least one significant clinical improvement at month 1 was 62% in the bilateral group versus 84% in the unilateral group (P = .0891), RR = 0.74 (0.51; 1.07). There was no significant difference between bilateral and unilateral groups in terms of improvement of urinary frequency (0% and 17%; P = .1115), number of urge incontinence episodes (52% and 63%; P = .4929) or number of urinary urgency episodes (57% and 74%; P = .2411). More complications were reported in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (9 [47%] vs 4 [16%], respectively; P = .0239). Systematic bilateral sacral neuromodulation testing before final implantation did not appear to increase success rate compared with unilateral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder.

Sacral neuromodulation to treat voiding dysfunction in patients with previous pelvic surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis: our centre's experience

Introduction and hypothesisVoiding symptoms/dysfunctions (VS/Ds) after surgery for deep-infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) are frequent (20% of patients) and, together with bowel dysfunctions, may represent a de novo disorder due to surgical damage of the pelvic plexus or a worsening of pre-existent functional damage. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) might improve voiding symptoms by treating dysfunctional voiding. The aim of this study is to report our experience with SNM in patients treated with surgery for DIE.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 13 patients with VS/Ds after surgery for DIE. All patients were investigated with urodynamic studies (UDS) and agreed to undergo SNM. Pre-existing VS/Ds, bowel disorders and pelvic pain, DIE surgical procedures, UDS and SNM test results were recorded.ResultsAfter surgery for DIE, functional bladder outflow obstruction and detrusor acontractility were observed in nine and four patients, respectively. Chronic pelvic pain was present in seven cases. Twelve patients developed constipation, whilst one patient had de novo faecal incontinence. After the SNM testing period, nine patients (69.2%) experienced a significant improvement of symptoms that led to definitive implant. Four patients (30.8%) had no symptom relief and the system was removed.ConclusionsFunctional bladder outflow obstruction and urinary retention are the most common VS/Ds after surgery for DIE. SNM may be an effective option for these patients, probably due to its action in improving the dysfunctional voiding, which was likely to be already present as part of the “endometriotic syndrome” and got worse after pelvic surgery. Results for pelvic pain control and gastrointestinal disorders should not be underestimated.

Five-year single center experience of sacral neuromodulation for isolated fecal incontinence or fecal incontinence combined with low anterior resection syndrome.

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has proven to be a safe and effective treatment for fecal incontinence (FI). For low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), however, SNM efficacy is still poorly documented. The primary aim of this study was to report on efficacy of SNM therapy for patients with isolated FI or LARS. Furthermore, we evaluated the safety of the procedure and the relevance of adequate follow-up. A retrospective analysis was performed upon a prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent SNM therapy for isolated FI or LARS between January 2014 and January 2019. The Wexner and LARS scores were evaluated at baseline, during test phase, after definitive implantation and annually during follow-up. Treatment success was defined as at least 50% improvement of the Wexner score or a reduction to minor or no LARS. Out of 89 patients with isolated FI or LARS who had a SNM test phase, 62 patients were eligible for implantation of the permanent SNM device. At baseline, 3weeks, and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5years after definitive implantation the median Wexner score of all patients was 18, 2, 4.5, 5, 5, 4 and 4.5, respectively, and 18, 4, 5.5, 5, 4, 3 and 4, respectively, for patients with FI and LARS. Patients with LARS more frequently required changes in program settings. SNM therapy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with isolated FI and patients with FI and LARS. Adequate follow-up is essential to ensure long-term effectivity, especially for LARS patients.

Does age alone negatively predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation? A single-centre retrospective observational study

BackgroundFor patients over the age of 70 years, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is often not considered a potential therapeutic option. We therefore report on our results from performing SNM in elderly patients ≥70 years.MethodsBetween 01/09 and 12/18, a total of 95 patients with refractory overactive bladder (OAB) or chronic non-obstructive urinary retention underwent SNM testing at our department. In the overall sample, 20 patients were aged 70 years or older (21%, group B), and 75 patients were under 70 years old (79%, group A). The mean follow-up period was 50.2 ± 36.2 months. Pre-, peri- and postoperative parameters were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS 25.0 (p < 0.05).ResultsThe mean patient age was 53 ± 16 (17–76) years. The indications for SNM testing were OAB and retention in 51 and 49% of patients, respectively. A total of 56 patients (59%) [8 patients (40%) in group B, 48 patients (64%) in group A] had more than 50% improvement in the context of the test (stage 1), such that a permanent neuromodulator (stage 2) was implanted. A total of 14 patients, all under 70 years old except for one older female, needed to undergo revision due to defects or infection. Overall, the success rate was 58.3% for OAB and 59.6% for urinary retention. The success rates and complications in our patient group were independent of age and geriatric assessment.ConclusionSNM can also be successfully implemented in older patients.

The Value of Ambulatory Urodynamics in the Evaluation of Treatment Effect of Sacral Neuromodulation

Objectives: To assess the improvement of symptoms by sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in an objective way by carrying out an ambulatory urodynamic study (ambulatory-UDS). Until now, successful treatment has been defined as a ≥50% improvement recorded on voiding diaries. Voiding diaries are a patient reported outcome tool. A tool with less bias is desired to evaluate the treatment results before an expensive permanent system is implanted. Methods: Between 2002 and 2015, a total of 334 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms were included consecutively in an ambulatory-UDS database. From this database, a subgroup of patients was selected which underwent SNM. Results: In 51 patients, an ambulatory-UDS was performed both at baseline and during the SNM test period. A positive treatment outcome after test stimulation based on the patients’ voiding diary, correlated (p < 0.0001) with an improvement on ambulatory-UDS. Twenty-six of the 30 patients, who have showed improvement of more than 50% on voiding diary parameters and who had subjective improvement of their symptoms, showed an early improvement on ambulatory-UDS. Conclusions: Ambulatory-UDS can be used in clinical decision making, as it is associated with voiding diary improvement during the SNM test period. Using ambulatory-UDS to confirm success could in the future justify the shortening of the test period.