Rural Trauma Care Research Articles

Investigation and validation of the TEG6s during rotary wing aeromedical flight.

To improve rural and austere trauma care, hospital-based testing performed at the point of injury may shorten the time lapsed from injury to intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the TEG6s device (Haemonetics(R), Clinton, PA) in a rotary wing aircraft. Prior attempts suffered from limitation related to lack of vibration mitigation. This was an investigator-initiated, industry-supported study. Haemonetics provided a TEG6s analyzer. The device underwent a standard validation. It was secured in place on the aircraft using shipping foam for vibration mitigation. Donors provided two tubes of sample blood in one sitting. Paired studies were performed on the aircraft during level flight and in the hospital, using the Global Hemostasis with Lysis Cartridge(Haemonetics (R), Clinton, PA). Both normal and presumed pathologic samples were tested in separate phases. Paired t tests were performed. For normal donors, the mean R for laboratory compared with the aircraft was 6.2 minutes versus 7.2 minutes ( p = 0.025). The mean ± SD Citrated Rapid TEG Maximum Amplitude (CRT MA) was 59.3 ± 5.6 mm and 55.9 ± 7.3 mm ( p < 0.001) for laboratory and aircraft ( p < 0.001). Among normal donors, R was within normal range for 17 of 18 laboratory tests and 18 of 18 aircraft tests ( p > 0.99). During the testing of pathologic samples, the mean R time was 14.8 minutes for laboratory samples and 12.6 minutes for aircraft ( p = 0.02). Aircraft samples were classified as abnormal in 78% of samples; this was not significantly different than laboratory samples ( p = 0.5). The use of the TEG6s for inflight viscoelastic testing appears promising. While statistically significant differences are seen in some results, these values are not considered clinically significant. Classifying samples as normal or abnormal demonstrated a higher correlation. Future studies should focus on longer flight times to evaluate for LY30, takeoff, and landing effects. Overall, this study suggests that TEG6s can be used in a prehospital environment, and further study is warranted. Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level III.

Experiences of rural clinicians accessing specialist support via telehealth for trauma and emergency care in Queensland, Australia.

Trauma and emergency patients presenting to rural facilities require time-critical treatment and management that is sometimes beyond the scope of clinicians in the facility. In Queensland, Australia's second largest state, telehealth infrastructure facilitates 24/7 communication between rural clinicians and tertiary-based critical care specialists. We sought to understand the current state of Queensland's emergency telehealth system from the perspective of direct end-users to inform future improvement efforts and resource allocation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 rural Queensland clinicians who use telehealth to access specialist support during critical presentations. Qualitative data were analysed in three inductive phases: immersion; a combination of process coding and in vivo coding; and focused coding. The findings highlight that emergency telehealth support provides benefits beyond better patient care, as it fosters collegiality and alleviates professional isolation. Three key themes were identified: (a) strategies for overcoming challenges in providing trauma and emergency care in rural Queensland; (b) factors that affect perceptions of telehealth effectiveness; and (c) how support for rural trauma and emergency care can be improved. To provide context for the themes, a summary of scene-setting data is also provided. There are both advantages and disadvantages for rural clinicians accessing telehealth specialist support for critical care. Although telehealth is seen as a vital service that supports rural clinicians and benefits patient care, the findings suggest that tools, systems and processes surrounding rural trauma and emergency care could benefit from streamlining, integration, and the introduction of fit-for-purpose technologies. Addressing limitations of efficiencies would improve support for rural clinicians and likely improve patient outcomes for rural communities.

Contemporary Rural Trauma Care.

The development of organized trauma systems has led to improved care for trauma patients, including those injured in rural areas. However, persistent disparities have led to increased awareness of the ongoing need for improvement. Our objective is to highlight distinctive aspects of rural trauma and propose opportunities for advancing rural trauma care.

Pediatric trauma in the rural and low resourced communities

Death and disability associated with traumatic injury can be significantly decreased with timely and appropriate care. Patients in rural areas tend to have disproportionately decreased access to this care, with the pediatric age group acting as a particularly difficult challenge for pre-hospital and rural hospital settings due to the unfamiliarity of those trauma response teams with pediatric age specific management guidelines as well as a disparity in resource availability. In this review, we attempt to discuss the challenges facing pediatric trauma care in the rural and low resourced communities, as well as initiatives that are being carried out to optimize this kind of care, such as pediatric readiness, rapid transportation to higher levels of care, availability of blood in rural centers as well as in transit, and the utility of telemedicine in improving rural pediatric trauma care.

Factors associated with teletrauma utilization in rural areas: a review of the literature.

Trauma patients residing in rural areas face increased challenges to accessing timely and appropriate health services as a result of large geographic distances and limited resource availability. Virtual trauma supports, coined 'teletrauma', are one solution offered to address gaps in rural trauma care. Teletrauma represents a new and innovative solution to addressing health system gaps and optimizing patient care within rural settings. Here, the authors synthesize the empirical evidence on teletrauma research. A review of literature, with no date limiters, was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) scoping review methodology. The aim of the review was to provide an overview of the current landscape of teletrauma research while identifying factors associated with utilization. Following a systematic search of key health databases, 1484 articles were initially identified, of which 28 met the inclusion criteria and were included for final analysis. From the review of the literature, the benefits of teletrauma for rural and remote areas were well-recognized. Several factors were found to be significantly associated with teletrauma utilization, including younger patient age, penetrating injury, and higher injury or illness severity. Lack of access to resources and clinician characteristics were also identified as reasons that sites adopted teletrauma services. By identifying factors associated with teletrauma utilization, teletrauma programs may be used more judiciously and effectively in rural areas as a means of enhancing access to definitive trauma care in rural areas. Gaps in current knowledge were also identified, along with recommendations for future research.

Overview of telemedicine use aspects in natural and technical disaster and combat situation

Preparation and hospital development estimated an essential part of the policies and strategic purposes of healthcare in each government. Today, applications of management to reduce the burden of natural and technical disasters appear are very necessary. Objectives: The study aimed to review the major relevant articles in the case of the application of telemedicine for trauma injuries in disaster and military situations. Methods: Original clinical trials investigating the effects of telemedicine on trauma injuries published before April 2018 were aggregated, and used in this study. We search the scientific sources such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Wiley, EMBASE, ISI, and Scopus. The keywords that applied to identify these articles combined: Telemedicine, Mobile Health, Health, Mobile, mHealth, Telehealth, eHealth, Trauma, War, military, medicine, Wounds and Injuries, injuries. Results: The text of the articles and abstracts were examined from various aspects, the 21 articles were evaluated for quality, and then 10 papers entered in a systematic review. We found that the use of telemedicine in trauma injury, rural and the military is very helpful for high-quality trauma care; also the telemedicine and telephone consultations can be were demonstrated reducing the risk of physician-related medicine mistakes. The economic evaluation of telemedicine was demonstrated cost-saving and cost-effective of telemedicine consultations. We also realized the importance and practicable of telemedicine for improving rural trauma care. Conclusions: Ultimately, the telemedicine can help patients and health government organizations economically, the telemedicine consultations due to cost-saving and cost-effective. Further studies to evaluate the running of telemedicine need to abating the practical and high-efficiency method, that can be done everywhere and it's free from mistakes and defects.

"Making It Work": A Preliminary Mixed Methods Study of Rural Trauma Care Access and Resources in New Mexico.

IntroductionPatients in the rural western United States face challenges accessing trauma and surgical services and are more likely to succumb to their injuries. New Mexico, a rural and medically underresourced state, is a salient space to study these disparities. We examine how travel distance from trauma centers impacts injured patient outcomes and describe care delivery obstacles.Materials and MethodsWe conducted an explanatory mixed methods study by creating geospatial maps of New Mexico’s trauma data, incorporating linear regression analyses on patient outcomes as a function of estimated travel distance from trauma centers. We also conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with trauma providers to illuminate and provide context for the geospatial findings utilizing a systematic, collaborative, iterative transcript analysis process. We constructed a conceptual framework describing rural trauma care delivery obstacles.ResultsGeospatial analyses revealed that most New Mexicans face long travel times to trauma centers. Comparing regression analyses using different data sources suggests that solely hospital-derived data may undercount rural trauma deaths. Interviews with 10 providers suggest that elements that may contribute to these findings include on-the-ground resource-based challenges and those related to broader healthcare systems-based issues. Our conceptual framework denotes how these elements collectively may impact rural trauma outcomes and proposes potential solutions.ConclusionsIn addressing rural patients’ needs, healthcare policy decision-makers should ensure that their datasets are comprehensive and inclusive. They must also take into account the particular challenges of underserved rural patients and providers who care for them by eliciting their perspectives, as presented in our conceptual framework.

An Overview of Trauma Center Levels and Disparities in Rural Trauma Care

Trauma centers in the United States focus on providing care to patients who have suffered injuries and may require critical care. These trauma centers are classified into five different levels: Level I to Level V. Level V trauma centers are the least comprehensive, providing minimal 24-hour care and resuscitation, and Level I trauma centers are the most comprehensive, accepting the most severely injured patients and always delivering care through the use of an attending surgeon. However, there is a major inequity in access to trauma centers across the United States, especially amongst rural residents. Level III to Level V trauma centers tend to be dominantly situated in rural and underserved areas. Furthermore, trauma centers tend to be widely dispersed with respect to rural areas. Therefore, these areas tend to have a greater mortality rate in relation to traumatic injuries. Improvements in access to high-tier traumatic care must occur in order to reduce mortality due to traumatic injuries in underserved rural areas. Possible improvements to rural trauma care include bolstering the quality of care in Level III trauma centers, increasing Level II center efficiency through the involvement of orthopedic traumatologists, placing medical helicopter bases in more strategic locations that enable transport teams to reach other trauma centers faster, building more Level I and Level II trauma centers, and converting Level III centers into either Level I or Level II centers.

Prehospital Trauma Care: A Simulation Scenario for Rural-Based Healthcare Providers

Trauma is a major cause of premature death and disability worldwide, with a disproportionate number of deaths occurring in rural and remote areas. Prehospital care is a key link in the chain of trauma survival and its role may be currently underestimated. Therefore, addressing deficiencies in prehospital trauma care may help to improve outcomes. Several potential solutions have been proposed to address the disparities that exist in rural prehospital trauma care, some of which focus on educational endeavors. Simulation-based medical education (SBME) is one cost-effective strategy to train healthcare providers in high-acuity, low-opportunity (HALO) scenarios, such as those encountered during major trauma. The aim of this technical report is to present a mass casualty simulation scenario that is intended for healthcare providers in rural and remote locations to refine their skills and comfort level with such cases. It emphasizes prehospital trauma management and effective communication skills among healthcare teams, which are two key elements in improving trauma outcomes.

P080: Trauma experiences of rural emergency physicians: a self assessment

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to identify, through self-assessment, how comfortable rural emergency medicine (EM) practitioners are in treating critically ill trauma patients, the resources available to treat such patients and their comfort with performing trauma procedures. Our goal is to enhance rural trauma care by identifying obstacles rural EM physicians face in Saskatchewan. Methods: This was a cross sectional survey study, emailed to family physicians practicing rural EM in Saskatchewan identified through the Saskatchewan Medical Association database. Inclusion criteria included physicians who are providing EM care currently or within the past year. Rural was assumed to be communities in Saskatchewan that were outside of Saskatoon and Regina. The survey was an anonymous self-assessment regarding demographics, training, hospital resources and comfort. Results: 113 physicians of the 479 rural physicians agreed to participate, 78 met our inclusion criteria. Most (67%) were from communities with less than 10,000 population, 70% had less than 300 ED visits per month. Most (68%) were less than 45 years of age. In terms of training, 57% had completed undergraduate training out of Canada and 63% had completed residency training in Canada. Most had been practicing for more than 2 years (76%). Most (59%) had current ATLS credentials, however only 37% had ever completed the EDE course. Regarding available resources, most centers had plain radiography (99%), POCUS (68%), PRBC (78%) and TXA (93%). However, fresh frozen plasma (41%) and platelets (26%) were not widely available. Comfort was measured on a Likert scale. The types of trauma that respondents were least comfortable with included pediatric (39%), vascular (46%), spine (56%) and genitourinary (60%). The types skills that participants were least comfortable with included pericardiocentesis (19%), and surgical airway (25%). The majority had not performed Pediatric endotracheal tube insertion (79%), surgical airways (99%), pericardiocentesis (99%), central venous line placement (80%) and needle thoracentesis (71%) within the past 12 months. Conclusion: This self-assessment helped us identify aspects of rural trauma medicine that are the most challenging for rural practitioners. Understanding the most difficult challenges in light of the critical resources available to rural trauma medicine providers will inform future professional development initiatives.

An Epidemiological Analysis of Head Injuries in Taiwan.

Traumatic head injuries occur frequently in Taiwan, having catastrophic consequences for the victims, their families, and society as a whole. However, little is known about the risk factors at the population level in Taiwan. The primary aim of this study was to obtain more information on these variables and their relationships. Another aim was to analyze the effects of independent variables such as sex, age, residency, pre-existing conditions, mechanisms of injury, associated injuries, and severity on the probability of in-hospital death. Using the 2007–2008 total admissions claim dataset from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance system, total admissions due to acute head injury were selected for further analysis. The obtained data included patient demographics and trauma hospitalization rate. A total of 99,391 patients were admitted with head injury, 48,792 of which had moderate-to-severe head injury. There were 4935 cases recorded as in-hospital mortality and the standardized in-hospital mortality rate was 10.7 deaths per 100,000 person-years. The mortality rate increased with age. After adjustments, male sex, age older than 54 years, living in a rural area, lower monthly income, a Charlson comorbidity index greater than one, being a pedestrian hit by a motor vehicle, fall from a height, and having significant chest, abdominal, or lower extremity injury increased the risk of death during admission. This population-based analysis provides information about the incidence rate and death rate for admissions in Taiwan due to acute head injury and the factors that affect in-hospital mortality. Our results that highlight the risk factors for adverse outcome can help us prevent or improve rural area trauma care of head injury patients in the future.

Beliefs and expectations of rural hospital practitioners towards a developing trauma system: A qualitative case study

BackgroundAn understanding of stakeholders’ views is key to the successful development and operation of a rural trauma system. Scotland, which has large remote and rural areas, is currently implementing a national trauma system. The aim of this study was to identify key barriers and enablers to the development of an effective trauma system from the perspective of rural healthcare professionals. MethodsThis is a qualitative study, which was conducted in rural general hospitals (RGH) in Scotland, from April to June 2017. We used an opportunistic sampling strategy to include hospital providers of rural trauma care across the region. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, recorded, and transcribed. Thematic analysis was used to identify and group participant perspectives on key barriers and enablers to the development of the new trauma system. ResultsWe conducted 15 interviews with 18 participants in six RGHs. Study participants described barriers and enablers across three themes: 1) quality of care, 2) interfaces within the system and 3) interfaces with the wider healthcare system. For quality of care, enablers included confidence in basic trauma management, whilst a perceived lack of change from current management was seen as a barrier. The theme of interfaces within the system identified good interaction with other services and a single point of contact for referral as enablers. Perceived barriers included challenges in referring to tertiary care. The final theme of interfaces with the wider healthcare system included an improved transport system, increased audit resource and coordinated clinical training as enablers. Perceived barriers included a rural staffing crisis and problematic patient transfer to further care. ConclusionsThis study provides insight into rural professionals’ perceptions regarding the implementation of a trauma system in rural Scotland. Barriers included practical issues, such as retrieval, transfer and referral processes. Importantly, there is a degree of uncertainty, discontent and disengagement towards trauma system development, and concerns regarding staffing levels and governance. These issues are unlikely to be unique to Scotland and warrant further study to inform service planning and the effective delivery of rural trauma systems.

P104: Literature review of telemedicine for trauma patients in rural areas

Introduction: Trauma is the leading cause of death among people under 40. With more than 7 million Canadians living over one hour’s travel from a level 1 or 2 trauma center, access to quality trauma care in Canada is a major concern. We recently reported that more than 40% of rural EDs across Canada were more than 300 km from levels 1 and 2 trauma centers. Direct transportation to trauma centers is therefore unusual and most trauma cases are initially managed in rural EDs. Assistance from trauma centers via telemedicine could thus be valuable in optimizing initial stabilization and inter-facility transfers. Objective: Is telemedicine a potentially effective intervention for improving rural trauma care? Methods: We conducted a literature review to examine the potential impact (number of transfers, transfer times, length of hospital stays and mortality) of telemedicine on rural trauma care. Two reviewers independently searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases with key words / concept combinations: telemedicine, trauma and rural. Articles included in the final review had to address the question with specific methodologies. After duplicate removal, 312 articles were found relevant. After independent review of titles and abstracts, only 25 articles pertained to the specific question. Only three studies met inclusion criteria. Results: These studies reported 187 successful teleconsultations in the context of rural trauma care, 29 of which involved significant interventions (8 interventions potentially lifesaving). Some unnecessary inter-facility transfers were avoided. However, transfer times to trauma centers and length of hospital stays appeared slightly longer with telemedicine. Conclusion: The literature on the efficacy of telemedicine in trauma care is scarce, with only three studies addressing the question. Conclusions generally favor telemedicine, but additional research must should determine its impact and better understand the barriers/facilitators to the implementation of telemedicine for rural trauma care.

Trauma quality improvement: The Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service experience with the development of a comprehensive structure to facilitate quality improvement in rural trauma and acute care in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Improving the delivery of efficient and effective surgical care in rural South Africa is a mammoth task bedevilled by conflict between the stakeholders, who include rural doctors, surgeons, ancillary staff, researchers, educators and administrators. Management training is not part of most medical school curricula, yet as they progress in their careers, many clinicians are required to manage a health system and find the shift from caring for individual patients to managing a complex system difficult. Conflict arises when management-type interventions are imposed in a top-down manner on surgical staff suspicious of an unfamiliar field of study. Another area of conflict concerns the place of surgical research. Researchers are often accused of not being sufficiently focused on or concerned about the tasks of service delivery. This article provides an overview of management theory and describes a comprehensive management structure that integrates a model for health systems with a strategic planning process, strategic planning tools and appropriate quality metrics, and shows how the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa, successfully used this structure to facilitate and contextualise a diverse number of quality improvement programmes and research initiatives in the realm of rural acute surgery and trauma. We have found this structure to be useful, and hope that it may be applied to other acute healthcare systems.

Smartphone Surgery: How Technology Can Transform Practice

Rural trauma care has been regarded as being the "challenge for the next decade." Trauma patients in rural areas face more struggles than their urban counterparts because of the absence of specialized trauma care, delay in providing immediate care to trauma victims, and longer transport times to reach a trauma center. Telemedicine is a promising tool for facilitating rural trauma care. This stellar tool creates a real-time link between a remotely located specialist and the local healthcare provider, especially during the initial management of the trauma patient, involving resuscitation and even intubation. However, the high cost of purchasing, setting up, and maintaining all the needed equipment has made telemedicine an expensive proposition for rural hospitals, which frequently have limited budgets. But recently, new improvements in communication technology have made smartphones an indispensable part of daily life, even in rural areas. These devices have great potential to improve patient care and enhance medical education because of their wide adoption and ease of use. In this article, we describe our initial teletrauma experience and the effect of smartphone implementation in patient care and medical education at the University of Arizona Medical Center in Tucson.

A comparison of rural versus urban trauma care

Objective:We compared the survival of trauma patients in urban versus rural settings after the implementation of a novel rural non-trauma center alternative care model called the Model Rural Trauma Project (MRTP).Materials and Methods:We conducted an observational cohort study of all trauma patients brought to eight rural northern California hospitals and two southern California urban trauma centers over a one-year period (1995-1996). Trauma patients with an injury severity score (ISS) of >10 were included in the study. We used logistic regression to assess disparities in odds of survival while controlling for Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) parameters.Results:A total of 1,122 trauma patients met criteria for this study, with 336 (30%) from the rural setting. The urban population was more seriously injured with a higher median ISS (17 urban and 14 rural) and a lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (GCS 14 urban and 15 rural). Patients in urban trauma centers were more likely to suffer penetrating trauma (25% urban versus 9% rural). After correcting for differences in patient population, the mortality associated with being treated in a rural hospital (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.39) was not significantly different than an urban trauma center.Conclusion:This study demonstrates that rural and urban trauma patients are inherently different. The rural system utilized in this study, with low volume and high blunt trauma rates, can effectively care for its population of trauma patients with an enhanced, committed trauma system, which allows for expeditious movement of patients toward definitive care.

Rural Trauma Telemedicine

Telemedicine is the ability to provide remote health care to patients with the use of a consultant and 2-way interactive technology and telecommunication. Traumatic injuries occurring in rural areas frequently carry a greater risk of mortality than those same injuries occurring in the urban settings. The purpose of this article was to increase practitioner awareness of the potential for improved outcomes as a result of the use of telemedicine in rural trauma care. The use of trauma telemedicine will help decrease the overall mortality and morbidity, length of stay at the urban trauma centers, patient care cost, and transfer time.

Secondary Overtriage

Unnecessary interfacility transfer of minimally injured patients to a level I trauma center (secondary overtriage) can cause inefficient use of resources and personnel within a regional trauma system. To describe the burden of secondary overtriage in a rural trauma system with a single level I trauma center. Retrospective analysis of institutional trauma registry data. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, a rural level I trauma center. A total of 7793 injured patients evaluated by the trauma service at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2011. Evaluation by the trauma service. Patients transferred from another hospital to Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center who did not require an operation, had an Injury Severity Score lower than 15, and were discharged alive within 48 hours of admission. Of the 7793 evaluated patients, 4796 (62%) were transferred from other facilities. When compared with scene calls (n = 2997), transferred patients had a similar median Injury Severity Score of 9, but 24% of transferred adult patients and 49% of transferred pediatric patients met our definition of secondary overtriage. The overtriaged patients were most likely to have injuries of the head and neck (56%), followed by skin and soft-tissue injuries (41%). Seventy-two unique institutions transferred trauma patients to Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, but 36% of the overtriaged patients were from 5 institutions. The incidence of secondary overtriage in our rural trauma center is 26%, with head and neck injuries being the most common reason for transfer. Costs for transportation and additional evaluation for such a significant percentage of patients has important resource utilization implications. Effective regionalization of rural trauma care should include methods to limit secondary overtriage.

Usability of Telepresence in a Level 1 Trauma Center

Limited resources and the diminishing physician workforce in trauma require unique and innovative solutions. Our hypothesis is that telepresence by a remote physician is an appropriate application in an urban trauma setting. The purpose of this study is to assess user satisfaction and usability of a mobile telemedicine robot in trauma care. A usability study of trauma patient assessments utilizing the Remote Presence-7 (RP-7) robot (InTouch Health, Santa Barbara, CA) with real-time, two-way communication between remote and local physicians was conducted at a Level 1 trauma center. Usability and acceptability was measured using survey questionnaires, open-ended feedback, and general observations. Comparisons were made between remote and local physician responses. One hundred fourteen patient encounters utilizing telepresence were performed. Remote and local physicians expressed a high level of satisfaction with the mobility (92% and 79%, respectively), communication (97% and 90%, respectively), and visual abilities (91% and 97%, respectively) of the RP-7 robot for remote consultation purposes. On average, 89% of remote and local physician participants rated their overall telemedicine experience as "excellent" or "above average." This study suggests that telepresence of a remote trauma surgeon may be a useful and functional adjunct in the trauma setting. Further development of these technologies could mitigate current and future concerns about gaps in rural and urban trauma care and critical care staffing shortages and during mass casualty or disaster scenarios.

The effects of prehospital plasma on patients with injury

The prehospital resuscitation of the exsanguinating patient with trauma is time and resource dependent. Rural trauma care magnifies these factors because transportation time to definitive care is increased. To address the early resuscitation needs and trauma-induced coagulopathy in the exsanguinating patient with trauma an aeromedical prehospital thawed plasma-first transfusion protocol was used. Retrospective review of trauma and flight registries between February 1, 2009, and May 31, 2011, was performed. The study population included all patients with traumatic injury transported by rotary wing aircraft who met criteria for massive transfusion protocol A total of 59 patients identified over 28 months met criteria for initiation of aeromedical initiation of prehospital blood product resuscitation. Nine patients received thawed plasma-first protocol compared with 50 controls. The prehospital plasma group was more commonly on warfarin (22 vs. 2%, p = 0.036) and had a greater degree of coagulopathy measured by international normalized ratio at baseline (2.6 vs. 1.5, p = 0.004) and trauma center arrival (1.6 vs. 1.3, p < 0.001). The prehospital plasma group had a predicted mortality nearly three times greater than controls based on Trauma and Injury Severity Score (0.24 vs. 0.66, p = 0.005). The use of prehospital plasma resuscitation led to a plasma-red blood cell ratio that more closely approximated a 1:1 resuscitation en route (1.3:1.0 vs. not applicable, p < 0.001), at 30 minutes (1.3:1.0 vs. 0.14:1.0, p < 0.001), at 6 hours (0.95:1.0 vs. 0.42:1.0, p < 0.001), and at 24 hours (1.0:1.0 vs. 0.45:1.0, p < 0.001). An equivalent amount of packed red blood cells were transfused between the groups. Despite more significant hypotension, less crystalloid was used in the prehospital thawed plasma group, through 24 hours after injury (6.3 vs. 16.4 L, p = 0.001). Use of plasma-first resuscitation in the helicopter system creates a field ready, mobile blood bank, allowing early resuscitation of the patient demonstrating need for massive transfusion. There was early treatment of trauma-induced coagulopathy. Although there was not a survival benefit demonstrated, there was resultant damage control resuscitation extending to 24 hours in the plasma-first cohort.