RpoS-dependent Promoter Research Articles

The General Stress Response Is Conserved in Long-Term Soil-Persistent Strains of Escherichia coli

Although Escherichia coli is generally considered to be predominantly a commensal of the gastrointestinal tract, a number of recent studies suggest that it is also capable of long-term survival and growth in environments outside the host. As the extraintestinal physical and chemical conditions are often different from those within the host, it is possible that distinct genetic adaptations may be required to enable this transition. Several studies have shown a trade-off between growth and stress resistance in nutrient-poor environments, with lesions in the rpoS locus, which encodes the stress sigma factor RpoS (σ(S)). In this study, we investigated a unique collection of long-term soil-persistent E. coli isolates to determine whether the RpoS-controlled general stress response is altered during adaptation to a nutrient-poor extraintestinal environment. The sequence of the rpoS locus was found to be highly conserved in these isolates, and no nonsense or frameshift mutations were detected. Known RpoS-dependent phenotypes, including glycogen synthesis and γ-aminobutyrate production, were found to be conserved in all strains. All strains expressed the full-length RpoS protein, which was fully functional using the RpoS-dependent promoter reporter fusion PgadX::gfp RpoS was shown to be essential for long-term soil survival of E. coli, since mutants lacking rpoS lost viability rapidly in soil survival assays. Thus, despite some phenotypic heterogeneity, the soil-persistent strains all retained a fully functional RpoS-regulated general stress response, which we interpret to indicate that the stresses encountered in soil provide a strong selective pressure for maintaining stress resistance, despite limited nutrient availability. Escherichia coli has been, and continues to be, used as an important indicator species reflecting potential fecal contamination events in the environment. However, recent studies have questioned the validity of this, since E. coli has been found to be capable of long-term colonization of soils. This study investigated whether long-term soil-persistent E. coli strains have evolved altered stress resistance characteristics. In particular, the study investigated whether the main regulator of genes involved in stress protection, the sigma factor RpoS, has been altered in the soil-persistent strains. The results show that RpoS stress protection is fully conserved in soil-persistent strains of E. coli They also show that loss of the rpoS gene dramatically reduces the ability of this organism to survive in a soil environment. Overall, the results indicate that soil represents a stressful environment for E. coli, and their survival in it requires that they deploy a full stress protection response.

The unphosphorylated EIIA(Ntr) protein represses the synthesis of alkylresorcinols in Azotobacter vinelandii.

Upon encystment induction, Azotobacter vinelandii produces the phenolic lipids alkylresorcinols (ARs) that are structural components of the cysts. The enzymes responsible for the ARs synthesis are encoded in the arsABCD operon, whose expression is activated by ArpR. The transcription of arpR is initiated from an RpoS dependent promoter. The nitrogen-related phosphotransferase system (PTSNtr) is a global regulatory system present in Gram negative bacteria. It comprises the EINtr, NPr and EIIANtr proteins encoded by ptsP, ptsO and ptsN genes respectively. These proteins participate in a phosphoryl-group transfer from phosphoenolpyruvate to protein EIIANtr via the phosphotransferases EINtr and NPr. In A. vinelandii, the non-phosphorylated form of EIIANtr was previously shown to repress the synthesis of poly-ß-hydroxybutyrate. In this work, we show that PTSNtr also regulates the synthesis of ARs. In a strain that carries unphosphorylated EIIANtr, the expression of arpR was reduced, while synthesis of ARs and transcription of arsA were almost abrogated. The expression of arpR from an RpoS-independent promoter in this strain restored the ARs synthesis. Taken together these results indicate that unphosphorylated EIIANtr negatively affects activation of arpR transcription by RpoS.

Expression dynamics of RpoS/Crl-dependent genes in Escherichia coli

The alternative sigma factor RpoS is a central regulator of the stress response in many Proteobacteria, acting both during exponential growth and in stationary phase. The small protein Crl increases the interaction between RpoS and RNA polymerase and thereby activates certain RpoS-dependent promoters. However, the growth-phase dependence of the interaction of Crl with different forms of polymerase remains unknown. We use 41 GFP transcriptional fusions to study the dynamics of gene regulation by RpoS and Crl during growth transition from exponential to stationary phase in Escherichia coli. We confirm that RpoS can regulate gene expression in exponential phase, both positively and negatively. Crl slightly stimulates transcription by RpoS in exponential phase and controls a subset of RpoS-dependent genes in stationary phase. Growth temperature strongly affects induction of specific promoters by RpoS, whereas its impact on gene regulation by Crl is much less significant. In addition, we identify five new genes regulated by Crl (ada, cbpA, glgS, sodC and flgM) and demonstrate that Crl improves promoter binding and opening by RpoS-containing RNA polymerase at the hdeA promoter. Our study also shows that Crl is a cognate enhancer of RpoS activity under different growth conditions, since its deletion has no effect on genes transcribed by other sigma factors.

ProQ Is an RNA Chaperone that Controls ProP Levels in Escherichia coli

Transporter ProP mediates osmolyte accumulation in Escherichia coli cells exposed to high osmolality media. The cytoplasmic ProQ protein amplifies ProP activity by an unknown mechanism. The N- and C-terminal domains of ProQ are predicted to be structurally similar to known RNA chaperone proteins FinO and Hfq from E. coli. Here we demonstrate that ProQ is an RNA chaperone, binding RNA and facilitating both RNA strand exchange and RNA duplexing. Experiments performed with the isolated ProQ domains showed that the FinO-like domain serves as a high-affinity RNA-binding domain, whereas the Hfq-like domain is largely responsible for RNA strand exchange and duplexing. These data suggest that ProQ may regulate ProP production. Transcription of proP proceeds from RpoD- and RpoS-dependent promoters. Lesions at proQ affected ProP levels in an osmolality- and growth phase-dependent manner, decreasing ProP levels when proP was expressed from its own chromosomal promoters or from a heterologous plasmid-based promoter. Small RNA molecules are known to regulate cellular levels of sigma factor RpoS. ProQ did not act by changing RpoS levels since proQ lesions did not influence RpoS-dependent stationary phase thermotolerance and they affected ProP production and activity similarly in bacteria without and with an rpoS defect. Taken together, these results suggest that ProQ does not regulate proP transcription. It may act as an RNA-binding protein to regulate proP translation.

Direct Interaction between Quorum-sensing Regulator SmcR and RNA Polymerase Is Mediated by Integration Host Factor to Activate vvpE Encoding Elastase in Vibrio vulnificus

It has been suggested that quorum sensing is an important signal transduction system regulating the expression of numerous virulence genes in bacterial pathogens. We previously revealed that SmcR, a LuxR homologue of Vibrio vulnificus, activates promoter S, an RpoS-dependent promoter of vvpE encoding a potential virulence factor elastase and binds in vitro to a binding site centered at -196.5. In this study, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays and promoter deletion analyses demonstrated that SmcR binds to the vvpE regulatory region in vivo and directly interacts with RNAP for activation of the vvpE expression. A search for regulatory genes involved in the regulation of elastase production singled out ihfA, which encodes for a subunit of integration host factor (IHF). Levels of both elastase activity and vvpE transcript decreased significantly as a result of inactivation of ihfA, and primer extension analyses demonstrated that IHF regulates the vvpE transcription by activating PS. Direct binding of IHF to the two distinct binding sites centered at -174 and -131, respectively, was determined using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay and a DNase I protection assay. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that the interaction of SmcR with RNAP in vivo was mediated by IHF. Collectively, the results proposed a model whereby IHF positions SmcR to contact RNAP by looping the vvpE regulatory DNA, thus allowing precise control of the expression level of VvpE during the pathogenesis of V. vulnificus.

Analysis of the dbpBA Upstream Regulatory Region Controlled by RpoS in Borrelia burgdorferi

Decorin-binding proteins B and A (DbpB and DbpA) are thought to play important roles in Borrelia burgdorferi pathogenesis by serving as adhesins for the extracellular matrix. It has been established that the expression of DbpBA is governed by the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS regulatory pathway. However, the precise mechanism underlying the control of DbpBA expression has been unclear. In particular, it has been unknown whether RpoS influences DbpBA expression directly or indirectly (through an additional regulatory molecule[s]). Here, employing a wild-type B. burgdorferi strain and a dbpBA-deficient mutant, we analyzed the 5' genetic elements of the dbpBA operon using deletion analysis, coupled with luciferase reporter assays, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, and immunoblot analyses. A minimal promoter, encompassed within 70 bp upstream of the ATG start codon of dbpBA, was identified and found to be necessary and sufficient to initiate dbpBA transcription. The minimal dbpBA promoter was responsive to environmental stimuli such as temperature, pH, and whole blood. Two in silico-identified inverted repeat elements were not involved in the response of dbpBA expression to in vitro stimulation by environmental factors. The expression of dbpBA from the minimal promoter was abolished when rpoS was inactivated. In addition, the targeted mutagenesis of a C at position -14 within the extended -10 region of dbpBA, which has been postulated to be strategic for Esigma(S) binding in Escherichia coli, abolished dbpBA expression in B. burgdorferi. These combined data suggest that the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS pathway controls dbpBA expression by the direct binding of RpoS to an RpoS-dependent promoter. However, given that there remains a distinct difference between the expression of DbpBA and other genes under the direct control of RpoS (e.g., OspC), our findings do not preclude the existence of another layer of gene regulation that may contribute to the modulation of DbpBA expression via an as-yet unknown mechanism.

Identification and Characterization of RpoS Regulon and RpoS-Dependent Promoters in Burkholderia pseudomallei

RpoS subunit of RNA polymerase is a bacterial alternative sigma factor and major regulator important for response to a variety of stress conditions. However, RpoS-dependent genes in Burkholderia pseudomallei remained undefined. We identified the RpoS regulon of B. pseudomallei using a proteomics approach, which revealed 70 differentially expressed proteins between rpoS(+) and rpoS(-) strains. The RpoS-dependent genes were then classified into 14 functional categories, most of which were related to stress response. We then used Hidden Markov Model (HMM) for prediction of RpoS-dependent promoters in 51 genes encoding 63 down-regulated proteins in rpoS(-) strain and successfully defined such promoters, which were classified into three main groups based upon their consensus sequences. Groups 1 and 2, which had the highest potential, were mostly "stress response" genes, whereas Group 3, with the lowest potential, belonged to genes encoding "hypothetical proteins". The promoter prediction was confirmed by 5'-RACE-PCR sequencing. We also expanded and defined RpoS-controlled genes from RpoS regulon, based on proteomic data, RpoS-dependent promoter prediction, gene organization and operon prediction. We finally confirmed the co-expression of these RpoS-dependent genes in operons using RT-PCR. Our data lead to better understanding of RpoS regulation in B. pseudomallei, whose RpoS regulon differs from other Gram-negative bacteria.

Analysis of promoter elements involved in the transcriptional initiation of RpoS-dependent Borrelia burgdorferi genes.

Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, encodes an RpoS ortholog (RpoS(Bb)) that controls the temperature-inducible differential expression of at least some of the spirochete's lipoprotein genes, including ospC and dbpBA. To begin to dissect the determinants of RpoS(Bb) recognition of, and selectivity for, its dependent promoters, we linked a green fluorescent protein reporter to the promoter regions of several B. burgdorferi genes with well-characterized expression patterns. Consistent with the expression patterns of the native genes/proteins in B. burgdorferi strain 297, we found that expression of the ospC, dbpBA, and ospF reporters in the spirochete was RpoS(Bb) dependent, while the ospE and flaB reporters were RpoS(Bb) independent. To compare promoter recognition by RpoS(Bb) with that of the prototype RpoS (RpoS(Ec)), we also introduced our panel of constructs into Escherichia coli. In this surrogate, maximal expression from the ospC, dbpBA, and ospF promoters clearly required RpoS, although in the absence of RpoS(Ec) the ospF promoter was weakly recognized by another E. coli sigma factor. Furthermore, RpoS(Bb) under the control of an inducible promoter was able to complement an E. coli rpoS mutant, although RpoS(Ec) and RpoS(Bb) each initiated greater activity from their own dependent promoters than they did from those of the heterologous sigma factor. Genetic analysis of the ospC promoter demonstrated that (i) the T(-14) in the presumptive -10 region plays an important role in sigma factor recognition in both organisms but is not as critical for transcriptional initiation by RpoS(Bb) as it is for RpoS(Ec); (ii) the nucleotide at the -15 position determines RpoS or sigma(70) selectivity in E. coli but does not serve the same function in B. burgdorferi; and (iii) the 110-bp region upstream of the core promoter is not required for RpoS(Ec)- or RpoS(Bb)-dependent activity in E. coli but is required for maximal expression from this promoter in B. burgdorferi. Taken together, the results of our studies suggest that the B. burgdorferi and E. coli RpoS proteins are able to catalyze transcription from RpoS-dependent promoters of either organism, but at least some of the nucleotide elements involved in transcriptional initiation and sigma factor selection in B. burgdorferi play a different role than has been described for E. coli.

SmcR and Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein Coactivate Vibrio vulnificus vvpE Encoding Elastase through the RpoS-dependent Promoter in a Synergistic Manner

The putative virulence factors of Vibrio vulnificus include an elastase, the gene product of vvpE. We previously demonstrated that vvpE expression is differentially directed by two different promoters in a growth phase-dependent manner. The activity of the stationaryphase promoter (promoter S (PS)) is dependent on RpoS and is also under the positive control of cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP). In this study, primer extension analyses revealed that SmcR, the Vibrio harveyi LuxR homolog, is also involved in the regulation of vvpE transcription by activating PS. Although the influence of CRP on PS is mediated by SmcR, the level of PS activity observed when CRP and SmcR function together was found to be greater than the sum of the PS activities achieved by each activator alone. Western blot analyses demonstrated that the cellular levels of RpoS, CRP, and SmcR were not significantly affected by one other, indicating that CRP and SmcR function cooperatively to activate PS rather than sequentially in a regulatory cascade. The binding sites for CRP and SmcR were mapped based on a deletion analysis of the vvpE promoter region and confirmed by in vitro DNase I protection assays. The binding sites for CRP and SmcR were juxtapositioned and centered 220 and 198 bp upstream of the transcription start site of PS, respectively. Accordingly, these results reveal that CRP and SmcR function synergistically to coactivate the expression of vvpE by the RpoS-dependent promoter (PS) and that the activators exert their effect by directly binding to the promoter in the stationary phase.

RpoS-dependent transcriptional control of sprE: regulatory feedback loop.

The stationary-phase response exhibited by Escherichia coli upon nutrient starvation is mainly induced by a decrease of the ClpXP-dependent degradation of the alternate primary sigma factor RpoS. Although it is known that the specific regulation of this proteolysis is exercised by the orphan response regulator SprE, it remains unclear how SprE's activity is regulated in vivo. Previous studies have demonstrated that the cellular content of SprE itself is paradoxically increased in stationary-phase cells in an RpoS-dependent fashion. We show here that this RpoS-dependent upregulation of SprE levels is due to increased transcription. Furthermore, we demonstrate that sprE is part of the two-gene rssA-sprE operon, but it can also be transcribed from an additional RpoS-dependent promoter located in the rssA-sprE intergenic region. In addition, by using an in-frame deletion in rssA we found that RssA does not regulate either SprE or RpoS under the conditions tested.

RpoS-dependent Promoters Require Guanosine Tetraphosphate for Induction Even in the Presence of High Levels of ςs

RpoS-dependent promoters require ppGpp for induction in the stationary phase. This has been thought to be a simple consequence of final sigma(S) itself requiring ppGpp for its production. By using four model promoters requiring final sigma(S) for normal induction in the stationary phase, we demonstrate that final sigma(S)-dependent promoters require ppGpp even in the presence of high levels of final sigma(S) produced ectopically. Similar to final sigma(70)-dependent promoters under positive control by ppGpp, the requirement of final sigma(S)-dependent promoters for this alarmone is bypassed by specific "stringent" mutations in the beta-subunit of RNA polymerase. The results suggest that stationary phase induction of both final sigma(S)- and final sigma(70)-dependent genes requires the stringent control modulon and that stringency confers dual control on the RpoS regulon by affecting promoter activity and the levels of the required final sigma-factor.

On-line monitoring of gene expression.

Gene expression in cultures of Escherichia coli has been determined in situ and on-line by the use of an electrochemical sensor. Intact bacteria were used to monitor the induction of the lacZ gene; the onset of stationary phase was also monitored, using a reporter gene fused to the RpoS-dependent promoter of the osmY gene. The technique described can in principle be used to determine the activity of any promoter, with a variety of reporter genes. This technology is non-intrusive, allows real-time monitoring of gene expression, and will be useful in the study of growth regulation and development.

Identification and analysis of the rpoS-dependent promoter of katE, encoding catalase HPII in Escherichia coli

The rpoS gene of Escherichia coli encodes an alternative sigma factor of RNA polymerase σ 38 (or σ S) that is required for transcription of katE encoding catalase HPII. The transcription start site of the single katE transcript identified by ribonuclease protection has been determined by primer extension analysis to be either 53 or 54 bp (depending on the strain used) upstream of the open reading frame. A series of promoter fragments were constructed and fused to lacZ to confirm the start site location. A −10 sequence similar to that found in other σ 70- and σ 38-dependent E. coli promoters was identified 8 or 7 bp upstream of the start site but a σ 70-dependent −35 sequence was not evident.