Usefulness Of Routine Chest Radiography Research Articles

Trends in Chest Radiographs for Pneumonia in Emergency Departments.

National guidelines recommend against routine use of chest radiography (CXR) for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) diagnosis in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Given that CXR is often used to exclude the diagnosis of CAP, a reduction in CXR use may result in overdiagnosis of CAP. We sought to evaluate trends in CXR use and assess the association between CXR performance and CAP diagnosis among children discharged from pediatric EDs. Children 3 months to 18 years of age discharged from 30 US EDs with (1) CAP or (2) fever or respiratory illness between 2008 and 2018 were included. Temporal trends in CXR use and rates of CAP diagnoses among patients with fever or respiratory illness were assessed. Correlation between hospital-level CXR use and CAP diagnosis rates were evaluated by using Spearman's correlation weighted by hospital volume. CXR usage decreased from 86.6% to 80.4% (P < .001) for patients with CAP and from 30.4% to 18.6% (P < .001) for children with fever or respiratory illness over the 10-year study period. CAP diagnosis rates also declined from 7.8% to 5.9% (P < .001). Hospital-level CXR use was correlated with pneumonia diagnosis rates (correlation coefficient 0.58; P < .001). Over the past decade, there has been a decline in CXR use in the ED among children with pneumonia and respiratory illnesses, with a decrease in pneumonia diagnoses over the same time period. Future studies are needed to assess the role of CXR in the evaluation of children with possible pneumonia in the ED setting.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Fever Without Source or Unknown Origin—Child

The cause of fever in a child can often be determined from history, physical examination, and laboratory tests; infections account for the majority of cases. Yet in 20%, no apparent cause can be found, designated as fever without source (FWS). The yield of chest radiography in children with FWS is low, and it is usually not appropriate. However, in children with respiratory signs, high fever (>39°C), or marked leukocytosis (≥20,000/mm3), chest radiography is usually appropriate, as it has a higher yield in detecting clinically occult pneumonia. In newborns with FWS, there is higher risk for serious bacterial infection, and the routine use of chest radiography is controversial. In children with neutropenia, fever is a major concern. In some clinical circumstances, such as after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, chest CT scan may be appropriate even if the results of chest radiography are negative or nonspecific, as it has higher sensitivity and can demonstrate specific findings (such as lung nodule and “halo sign”) that can guide management. In a child with prolonged fever of unknown origin despite extensive medical workup (fever of unknown origin), diagnosis is usually dependent on clinical and laboratory studies, and imaging tests have low yield.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Blunt Chest Trauma

Imaging is paramount in the setting of blunt trauma and is now the standard of care at any trauma center. Although anteroposterior radiography has inherent limitations, the ability to acquire a radiograph in the trauma bay with little interruption in clinical survey, monitoring, and treatment, as well as radiography's accepted role in screening for traumatic aortic injury, supports the routine use of chest radiography. Chest CT or CT angiography is the gold-standard routine imaging modality for detecting thoracic injuries caused by blunt trauma. There is disagreement on whether routine chest CT is necessary in all patients with histories of blunt trauma. Ultimately, the frequency and timing of CT chest imaging should be site specific and should depend on the local resources of the trauma center as well as patient status. Ultrasound may be beneficial in the detection of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and pericardial hemorrhage; transesophageal echocardiography is a first-line imaging tool in the setting of suspected cardiac injury. In the blunt trauma setting, MRI and nuclear medicine likely play no role in the acute setting, although these modalities may be helpful as problem-solving tools after initial assessment. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Quel est l’intérêt de la radiographie du thorax dans le diagnostic d’une pneumonie de l’enfant en 2011 ?

According to the French national health authority guidelines, the diagnosis of childhood pneumonia is based on clinical suspicion and radiological confirmation. The chest radiography is an expensive procedure, and potentially deleterious by its radiating character. We have attempted to clarify its diagnostic value in community acquired pneumonia in children through a literature review using the Pubmed search engine with the following keywords: “pneumonia, child, radiograph”. Conclusion: The indication of chest radiography in severe pneumonia achieved unanimity among the various scientific societies. In contrast, in mild forms, tendency of the available data is to not recommend the routine use of chest radiography; further randomised and prospective studies are necessary to confirm this trend. Finally, because of the frequency of atypical presentations in children, chest radiography retains all its usefulness in the etiologic diagnosis of fever of unknown origin.

An audit of 3859 preadmission chest radiographs of apparently healthy students in a Nigerian Tertiary Institution

Background:Chest radiographs are routinely requested as part of the medical screening process prior to admission to institutions. Literature on the yield of such an exercise is sparse especially in the Nigerian setting. This study was therefore carried out to assess the usefulness of routine chest radiography for students at the time of admission.Materials and Methods:This was a prospective study of 3859 chest X-rays taken at the department of radiology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital for one admission screening for the 2008/2009 academic year. The age and sex of the subjects were also recorded. The heart, lung fields and bony thorax were examined for any abnormality.Results:Out of the 3859 pre-admission chest radiographs studied, there were 1951 males or 50.56% and 1908 females or 49.44% subjects. The mean age for males was 21.15±3.Conclusion:This study has shown that pre-admission routine chest radiography in asymptomatic patients remains a relevant screening tool for medical fitness during admissions into institutions. However because of dangers of exposure to ionizing radiation, we advise that a detailed medical history and physical examination be done to restrict its use to only those subjects with signs and symptoms suggestive of disease.

Clinical Predictors of Pneumonia Among Children With Wheezing

The goal was to identify factors associated with radiographically confirmed pneumonia among children with wheezing in the emergency department (ED) setting. A prospective cohort study was performed with children <or=21 years of age who were evaluated in the ED, were found to have wheezing on examination, and had chest radiography performed because of possible pneumonia. Historical features and examination findings were collected by treating physicians before knowledge of the chest radiograph results. Chest radiographs were read independently by 2 blinded radiologists. A total of 526 patients met the inclusion criteria; the median age was 1.9 years (interquartile range: 0.7-4.5 years), and 36% were hospitalized. A history of wheezing was present for 247 patients (47%). Twenty-six patients (4.9% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3-7.3]) had radiographic pneumonia. History of fever at home (positive likelihood ratio [LR]: 1.39 [95% CI: 1.13-1.70]), history of abdominal pain (positive LR: 2.85 [95% CI: 1.08-7.54]), triage temperature of >or=38 degrees C (positive LR: 2.03 [95% CI: 1.34-3.07]), maximal temperature in the ED of >or=38 degrees C (positive LR: 1.92 [95% CI: 1.48-2.49]), and triage oxygen saturation of <92% (positive LR: 3.06 [95% CI: 1.15-8.16]) were associated with increased risk of pneumonia. Among afebrile children (temperature of <38 degrees C) with wheezing, the rate of pneumonia was very low (2.2% [95% CI: 1.0-4.7]). Radiographic pneumonia among children with wheezing is uncommon. Historical and clinical factors may be used to determine the need for chest radiography for wheezing children. The routine use of chest radiography for children with wheezing but without fever should be discouraged.

The Role of Chest X-Ray in the Diagnosis of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Children: A Systematic Review

For many years the gold standard in diagnosing pneumonia has been the chest x-ray, both in clinical practice and for research purposes. The objective of this review was to examine the evidence to determine the role of chest x-ray in the diagnosis of pneumonia. A comprehensive literature search was conducted and abstracts were obtained from articles that, judged by their titles, bore relevance to the subject in question. Articles were selected for review based on their abstracts. Articles were subsequently reviewed, appraised and results were presented by grading evidence as Level I, II or III. Even the best available evidence failed to demonstrate improved outcome with the addition of chest radiography in ambulatory acute lower-respiratory infection in children. There is little evidence to justify the routine use of chest radiography in the diagnosis of pneumonia in children, but more research is needed to explore the potential benefit of chest radiography in specific clinical scenarios. Keywords: Pneumonia, chest x-ray/radiograph, diagnosis

Low yield of chest radiography in screening for active pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients in Hong Kong

This study assessed the usefulness of routine chest radiography for detecting active pulmonary tuberculosis in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) without suggestive symptoms in Hong Kong. Tuberculosis is common in this locality and tuberculosis/HIV co-infection has been a frequent and significant problem. Records of patients attending the largest HIV clinic were reviewed. Three hundred and eleven routine chest radiographs were performed among 191 HIV-infected patients with a total follow-up period of 792 person years. Of the 22 routine chest radiographs that had abnormalities in the lungs or hilar region, only one had led to the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. No patient with a normal chest radiograph was diagnosed to have tuberculosis within the following 2 months. The low yield (0.32%) suggests that routine chest radiography is not useful in screening for active pulmonary tuberculosis in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients even in a locality where the tuberculosis rate is high.

Randomised controlled trial of clinical outcome after chest radiograph in ambulatory acute lower-respiratory infection in children

When available, chest radiographs are used widely in acute lower-respiratory-tract infections in children. Their impact on clinical outcome is unknown. 522 children aged 2 to 59 months who met the WHO case definition for pneumonia were randomly allocated to have a chest radiograph or not. The main outcome was time to recovery, measured in a subset of 295 patients contactable by telephone. Subsidiary outcomes included diagnosis, management, and subsequent use of health facilities. There was a marginal improvement in time to recovery which was not clinically significant. The median time to recovery was 7 days in both groups (95% CI 6-8 days and 6-9 days in the radiograph and control groups respectively, p=0.50, log-rank test) and the hazard ratio for recovery was 1.08 (95% CI 0.85-1.34). This lack of effect was not modified by clinicians' experience and no subgroups were identified in which the chest radiograph had an effect. Pneumonia and upper-respiratory infections were diagnosed more often and bronchiolitis less often in the radiograph group. Antibiotic use was higher in the radiograph group (60.8% vs 52.2%, p=0.05). There was no difference in subsequent use of health facilities. Chest radiograph did not affect clinical outcome in outpatient children with acute lower-respiratory infection. This lack of effect is independent of clinicians' experience. There are no clinically identifiable subgroups of children within the WHO case definition of pneumonia who are likely to benefit from a chest radiograph. We conclude that routine use of chest radiography is not beneficial in ambulatory children aged over 2 months with acute lower-respiratory-tract infection.

An audit of the use of chest radiography in the elderly mentally ill

AbstractChest X‐rays are widely used in the investigation of patients with both functional and organic mental illness. For patients with dementia their routine use has been recommended by many authorities. However, the existing evidence to support such use is not strong. A prospective audit was performed to ascertain the yield of chest X‐rays affecting patient management in a series of consecutive admissions covering all diagnoses. The yield of unexpected findings was substantial, but few of these led to a change in medical management and hence potentially to the course of illness. Apparently significant radiological findings did not always correlate with actual physical illness. The low yield of results affecting management does not support the routine use of chest radiography in elderly mentally ill, and its use should be limited to when functional illness is refractory to treatment or when demented patients suddenly deteriorate without obvious cause.