Routine Repeat Head Computed Tomography Research Articles

Role of Routine Repeat Head CT for Pediatric Patients under 2 Years Old with Mild-to-moderate Traumatic Brain Injury.

Repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) is common and routine for pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. In mild (Glasgow Coma Scale; GCS 13–15) to moderate (GCS 9–12) TBI, recent studies have shown that RHCT without clinical deterioration does not alter management. However, the effectiveness of routine RHCT for pediatric TBI patients under 2 years has not been investigated. This study aims to investigate whether routine RHCT changes management in mild-to-moderate TBI patients under 2 years. We performed a retrospective review at the emergency department of the National Center for Child Health and Development between January 2015 and December 2019. Mild-to-moderate TBI patients under 2 years with an acute intracranial injury on initial head CT scan and receiving follow-up CT scans were included. Mechanism, severity of TBI, indication for RHCT, and their findings were listed. Study outcome was intervention based on the findings of RHCT. Intervention was defined as intubation, ICP monitor placement, or neurosurgery. We identified 50 patients who met inclusion criteria and most patients (48/50) had mild TBI. The most common mechanism was ‘fall’ (68%). Almost all RHCT was routine and the overall incidence of radiographic progression on RHCT was 12%. RHCT without clinical deterioration did not lead to intervention, although one patient with moderate TBI required intervention due to radiographic progression with clinical symptoms. Our study showed that routine RHCT without clinical deterioration for mild TBI patients under 2 years may not alter clinical management. We suggest that RHCT be considered when there is clinical deterioration such as decrease in GCS.

Repeat CT after blunt head trauma and Glasgow Coma Scale score 13-15 without neurological deterioration is very low yield for intervention.

Due to the increase in accessibility of computed tomography (CT), repeat head CT scans are routinely ordered for patients with minor head injuries. The aim of this study is to evaluate the necessity and outcomes of routine repeat head CT in patients with GCS score of 13-15 who presented to the emergency department (ED) of Antalya University Hospital in Turkey with blunt head trauma. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with minor head trauma that received initial and repeat head CT results from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015. Clinical characteristics of patients were compared for two groups of patients: those with neurological deterioration, and those who had routine head CT not required by change in neurological status. Repeat head CT results were analyzed for radiological worsening and the necessity of a surgical or medical intervention such as craniotomy, ICP monitoring, VP shunt and mannitol or hypertonic saline administration. Of 3578 patients with blunt head trauma, 656 (18.3%) patients had repeat head CT; 449 of these (68.4%) had a GCS score of 13-15. We analyzed 441 patients for CT and clinical changes. Eight patients were excluded because of poor image quality and/or penetrating injury. Neurological deterioration was the reason for repeat head CT in 73 (16.5%) patients Rates of medical (mannitol treatment) or surgical (craniotomy) intervention in this group were 26% (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI], 15.7-36.3%) in contrast to 0.8% (95% CI 0.1-1.7%) in the group of patients with routinely ordered head CT but without clinical deterioration. The following factors were statistically associated with need for intervention: use of anticoagulant or antithrombotic medication, fracture in middle meningeal artery territory, even a single point decrease in GCS score, increased headache, recurrent vomiting, neurological deficit, and finally, changes in repeat head CT. In patients with minor head injuries, those without neurological deterioration have a very low risk of need for medical or surgical intervention. Routinely ordering repeat head CT scans in this group may not be routinely indicated.

Assessing the efficacy of mild traumatic brain injury management

ObjectiveIntracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is frequently found on computed tomography (CT) after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) prompting transfer to centers with neurosurgical coverage and repeat imaging to confirm hemorrhage stability. Studies suggest routine repeat imaging has little utility in patients with minimal ICH, no anticoagulant/antiplatelet use, and no neurological decline. Additionally, it is unclear which mTBI patients benefit from transfer for neurosurgery consultation. The authors sought to assess the clinical utility and cost effectiveness of routine repeat head CTs and transfer to tertiary centers in patients with low-risk, mTBI. MethodsRetrospective evaluation of patients receiving a neurosurgical consultation for TBI during a 4-year period was performed at a level 1 trauma center. Patients were stratified according to risk for neurosurgical intervention based on their initial clinical evaluation and head CT. Only patients with low-risk, mTBI were included. ResultsOf 531 patients, 119 met inclusion criteria. Eighty-eight (74.0 %) received two or more CTs. Direct cost of repeat imaging was $273,374. Thirty-seven (31.1 %) were transferred to our facility from hospitals without neurosurgical coverage, costing $61,384. No patient had neurosurgical intervention or mTBI-related in-hospital mortality despite enlarging ICH on repeat CT in three patients. Two patients had mTBI related 30-day readmission for seizure without ICH expansion. ConclusionRoutine repeat head CT or transfer of low-risk, mTBI patients to a tertiary center did not result in neurosurgical intervention. Serial neurological examinations may be a safe, cost-effective alternative to repeat imaging for select mTBI patients. A large prospective analysis is warranted for further evaluation.

Acute and Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Head-Injured Patients on Warfarin versus Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy.

Introduction:Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use for thrombosis treatment and prophylaxis is a popular alternative to warfarin. This study compares rates of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) for patients on anticoagulant therapies and the effect of combined anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies.Methods:A retrospective observational study of trauma patients was conducted at two level I trauma centers. Patients aged ≥18 years with preinjury use of an anticoagulant (warfarin, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or dabigatran) who sustained a blunt head injury within the past day were included. Patients were evaluated by head CT to evaluate for ICH.Results:Three hundred and eighty-eight patients were included (140 on warfarin, 149 on a DOAC, and 99 on combined anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies). Seventy-nine patients (20.4%) had an acute ICH, while 16 patients (4.1%) had a delayed ICH found on routine repeat CT. Those on combination therapy were not at increased risk of acute ICH (relative risk [RR] 0.90, confidence interval [CI]: 0.56–1.44; P > 0.5) or delayed ICH (RR 2.19, CI: 0.84–5.69; P = 0.10) compared to anticoagulant use only. Those on warfarin were at increased risk of acute ICH (RR 1.75, CI: 1.10–2.78, P = 0.015), but not delayed ICH (RR 0.99, CI 0.27–3.59, P > 0.5), compared to those on DOACs. No delayed ICH patients died or required neurosurgical intervention.Conclusion:Patients on warfarin had a higher rate of acute ICH, but not delayed ICH, compared to those on DOACs. Given the low rate of delayed ICH with no resultant morbidity or mortality, routine observation and repeat head CT on patients with no acute ICH may not be necessary.

HEMORRHAGIC PROGRESSION OF CONTUSION IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY ON THE ROUTINE REPEAT HEAD COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Computed tomography (CT) scan is a standard for the diagnosis of intracranial pathology after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Hemorrhagic progression of contusion (HPC) is frequently seen on repeat CT, but its clinical and radiological significance in case of mild TBI is not well define. The aim of the study: to evaluate the result of routine repeat head CT in patients with mild TBI and brain contusions. Materials and methods: retrospective analysis of management of patients with mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score – 13 to 15) and cerebral contusion. All patients were treated at the Kyiv City Clinical Emergency Hospital between 2016 and 2017. Results: within 202 patients with mild TBI, 87 (43.1 %) met the inclusion criteria and were selected for detailed analysis. There were 69 (79.3 %) men and 18 (20.7 %) women. The mean age of the patients was 43.8±12.7 years (17–82 years). The average time between trauma and CT was 3.3 hours. The average volume of contusion on the initial CT was 1.9±0.6 cm3 (0.2–9.6 cm3). The average time of routine CT was 6.8 hours (range 4–24 hours) after the initial scans. HPC was found in 24 (30.7 %) of 87 cases. The average volume of brain contusion on the repeat CT was 2.3±0.5 cm3 (0.2-17.1 cm3). In 3 (3.4 %) patients the size of the hematoma increased. Clinical deterioration occurred in 10 (11.5 %) patients. Six (6.9 %) patients were operated after a CT scan due to HPC with midline shift in 4 cases and increasing of subdural hematoma – 2 cases. Four of these patients had clinical deterioration, and 2 patients were neurological stable. Patients with HPC at admission had lower points of GCS, fractures of the skull (both p <0.001), subdural blood collection (p=0.002), a higher average duration of treatment 8.1±4.2 vs 14.3±5.2 days (p=0.0001), and mortality rate 0 vs. 3 (12.5 %) (p=0.02). Conclusions: Routine repeat CT in patients with mild TBI with brain contusions is aimed to find a patients with s high risk for clinical deterioration. One third of patients with mild TBI and brain contusion experienced HPC. Patients with HPC often have unfavorable clinical course with higher average duration of treatment, delay surgical treatment and mortality rate.

Role of repeat CT in mild to moderate head injury: an institutional study.

Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) often undergo repeat head CT scans to identify the possible progression of injury. The objective of this study is to evaluate the need for routine repeat head CT scans in patients with mild to moderate head injury and an initial positive abnormal CT scan. This is a retrospective study of patients presenting to the emergency department from January 2016 to December 2017 with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores > 8 and an initial abnormal CT scan, who underwent repeat CT during their in-hospital medical management. Patients who underwent surgery after the first CT scan, had a GCS score < 9, or had a normal initial CT scan were excluded. Demographic, medical history, and physical examination details were collected, and CT scans were reviewed. Radiological deterioration, neurological deterioration, and/or the need for neurosurgical intervention were the primary outcome variables. A total of 1033 patients were included in this study. These patients underwent at least two CT scans on an inpatient basis. Of these 1033 patients, 54.1% had mild head injury and 45.9% had moderate head injury based on GCS score at admission. The most common diagnosis was contusion (43.8%), followed by extradural hematoma (28.8%) and subdural hematoma (26.6%). A total of 2636 CT scans were performed for 1033 patients, with a mean of 2.55 per patient. Of these, 25 (2.4%) had neurological deterioration, 90 (8.7%) had a progression of an existing lesion or appearance of a new lesion on repeat CT, and 101 (9.8%) required neurosurgical intervention. Seventy-five patients underwent surgery due to worsening of repeat CT without neurological deterioration, so the average number of repeat CT scans required to identify one such patient was 21.3. On multiple logistic regression, GCS score at admission (p = 0.024), abnormal international normalized ratio (INR; p < 0.001), midline shift (p = 0.005), effaced basal cisterns (p < 0.001), and multiple hemorrhagic lesions (p = 0.010) were associated with worsening of repeat CT, neurological deterioration, and/or need for neurosurgical intervention. The role of routine repeat head CT in medically managed patients with head injury is controversial. The authors have tried to study the various factors that are associated with neurological deterioration, radiological deterioration, and/or need for neurosurgical intervention. In this study the authors found lower GCS score at admission, abnormal INR, presence of midline shift, effaced basal cisterns, and multiple lesions on initial CT to be significantly associated with the above outcomes.

Using Lean Six Sigma to Improve Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage Screening in a Geriatric Trauma Population.

Geriatric trauma patients taking preinjury anticoagulant or antiplatelet (ACAP) medications are at greater risk for delayed intracranial hemorrhage (DICH), a rare but potentially life-threatening condition. Routine repeat head computed tomography (RRHCT) scans can identify DICH. Our objective was to decrease the rate of missed RRHCT in a level 1 Midwest trauma center geriatric minor trauma population on preinjury ACAP medications. The objective of the quality improvement project was to identify the root cause of the missed RRHCTs and to implement a comprehensive solution to reduce rates of missed RRHCTs. Medical records from before and after the intervention were evaluated. Frequencies and percentages were calculated. In addition, χ and logistic regression were utilized. The Lean Six Sigma (LSS) DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control) process was used to drive process improvement. At baseline, 15% (41 of 267) of RRHCTs were missed. After solution implementation, missed RRHCTs dropped to 4% (2 of 50). Of the 2 that were missed, zero were clinically inappropriate misses, making the postimplementation rate effectively 0%. The LSS DMAIC process helped health care professional to facilitate improved adherence to the department's practice guideline with respect to RRHCT. Adherence with this guideline can help providers identify patients with DICH, a potentially life-threatening condition.

Optimization of Resource Allocation after Implementation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment Protocol

The purpose of this study was to assess resource utilization after implementation of a mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) treatment protocol. A retrospective review was conducted of patients with isolated mild TBI before and after implementation of a mild TBI treatment protocol in May 2015. Patients admitted from June 2014 to February 2017, aged 18 to 89 years, presenting with a Glasgow coma score of 13 to 15, with an isolated small intracerebral hemorrhage on CT without midline shift, and not coagulopathic were evaluated. According to the protocol, patients were admitted to a non-intensive care unit (ICU) ward, without routine neurosurgical consultation or repeat head CT unless clinically indicated. Hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, rate of neurosurgical consultation, rate of repeat head CT within 24 hours of admission, and associated costs were evaluated. Forty-six patients were identified in the preprotocol group and 97 in the protocol group. The protocol group had a shorter hospital LOS (1.46 vs 2.04 days, P = 0.0034), shorter ICU LOS (0.02 vs 0.37 days, P < 0.0001), lower rates of repeat head CT (2.06% vs 39.13%, P < 0.0001), and neurosurgical consultations (1.03% vs 28.26%, P < 0.0001). Decreased charges derived from fewer repeat head CT and neurosurgical consultations were observed from $43.98 to $844.04 per patient. There were no inpatient mortalities and no progressions of injury requiring unplanned admission to the ICU or operative intervention. Efficient delivery of care is paramount in modern medicine and this study demonstrates that the mild TBI treatment protocol significantly decreased resource utilization without jeopardizing patient safety.

Delayed intracranial hemorrhage in the patient with blunt trauma on anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents: routine repeat head computed tomography is unnecessary

ABSTRACTObjective: We postulate that in patients with blunt trauma on anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents, incidence and complication rate of delayed intracranial hemorrhage (DICH) after an initially negative head CT is low and routine repeat head CT is not warranted.Design: A retrospective, observational study performed from 2008 to 2012.Patients: A total of 338 patients with blunt trauma with pre-admission history of any anticoagulant use, who had an initially negative head CT, followed by a repeat CT within 48 hours.Interventions: There were no interventions, this was an observational study only.Measurements and main results: The sample had mean ISS of 8.6 and an average GCS of 15. 55% had obvious head trauma, 27.2% reported LOC. Incidence of DICH was 2.4% (8/338). All patients with DICH were taking aspirin (ASA) either alone or in combination with another anticoagulant. Of the eight patients with DICH, none required medical or surgical intervention and there were no mortalities. We identified no significant predictors of delayed ICH.Conclusions: Routine repeat head CT in patients with blunt trauma taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents is unnecessary. Incidence of DICH is low and, when found, DICH was clinically insignificant. We recommend close supervision in this population, especially those taking ASA alone or in combination with another anticoagulant.

Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and the Need for Imaging Surveillance.

To evaluate the need for repeat head computed tomography (CT) in patients with complicated mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) determined nonoperative after the first head CT. A total of 380 patients with mild TBI and a positive head CT not needing surgery were included. Changes between first and second head CT were categorized as decreased, increased, or stable. Three patients required neurosurgical intervention (0.8%) after the second CT. There were no significant differences in demographics including age, gender, alcohol consumption, anticoagulation status, time between first and second CT, Glasgow Coma Scale score at admission and discharge, and incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage, epidural hematoma, contusion, or skull fractures between the operated and nonoperated groups. All patients in the operated group had subdural hematoma compared with 40.8% in the nonoperated group (P= 0.07). All operated patients showed symptoms of neurologic worsening after initial head CT, compared with 2.7% in the nonoperated group (P < 0.001). Moreover, patients who showed neurologic worsening were more likely to show increased intracranial bleeding on repeat head CT, whereas patients who did not show neurologic worsening were more likely to show decreased or stable intracranial bleeding (P= 0.04). Routine repeat head CT in patients with complicated mild TBI is very low yield to predict need for delayed surgical intervention. Instead, serial neurologic examination and observation over the first 8 hours after the injury is recommended. A second CT scan should be obtained only in patients who have neurologic worsening.

The role of delayed head CT in evaluation of elderly blunt head trauma victims taking antithrombotic therapy

Increasing active longevity has created an increasing surge of elderly trauma patients. The majority of these patients suffer blunt trauma and many are taking antithrombotic agents. The literature is mixed regarding the utility of routine repeat head CT in patients taking antithrombotic medications with a GCS of 15 and initial negative head CT. We hypothesized that scheduled delayed CT head 12h after admission (D-CTH) in elderly blunt trauma victims would not identify clinically significant new hemorrhages or change management. A retrospective chart review using our institutional trauma registry of patients ≥65years sustaining blunt head injuries from 2010 to 2012 was performed. By hospital protocol, all such patients on antithrombotic therapy receive a routine D-CTH. All of these patients were included. Demographics, injuries, medications, laboratory values, LOS, mental status, and management were analyzed. Of the 234 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 8 initially were identified as having D-ICH. Upon further review, five patients had the same findings on both initial and delayed CT scans and one patient was determined to actually have had a hemorrhage stroke. Ultimately, only two patients (0.85%, 95% CI 0.1-3.1%) had new ICH discovered on D-CTH. None of the patients on warfarin demonstrated any new injury on D-CTH (95% CI≤4.6%). Only one patient taking aspirin as a sole agent had a delayed injury on D-CTH (1.1%, 95% CI 0-4.2%). The remaining patient was taking a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel representing 2.2% of 45 patients on combination therapy (95% CI 0.1-11.8%). Only two patients taking a direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) met inclusion criteria and neither endured a bleed (95% CI≤77.6%). Further analysis revealed no cases with clinical changes or surgical intervention for new ICH on delayed imaging. No inference could be made to predict which patients would suffer D-ICH. D-CTH in elderly trauma patients taking antithrombotic agents shows no statistically significant or clinical benefit for diagnosing delayed intracranial hemorrhage after minor head injury. In those with delayed imaging showing new ICH, management was not significantly altered. Not enough data were available to predict which patients would develop D-ICH, even if asymptomatic.

Eliminating unnecessary routine head CT scanning in neurologically intact mild traumatic brain injury patients: implementation and evaluation of a new protocol.

OBJECTIVE The utility of routine repeat head CT (HCT) scans in the management of minimal head injury (MHI) patients with an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has been questioned in multiple studies. All these studies analyzed this by obtaining a repeat HCT study, and none examined the effects of eliminating these routine HCT studies in neurologically intact patients. The authors' institution implemented a new "Neurologic Observation without Repeat HCT" (NORH) protocol with no repeat HCT scanning for patients admitted for MHI and ICH whose neurological status was maintained or improved to a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 at 24 hours after admission. This purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes and safety of this novel protocol. METHODS Records of patients who sustained blunt trauma MHI and an ICH and/or skull fracture on initial HCT between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, were retrieved from the trauma registry of a Level I trauma center. The authors analyzed 95 patients in whom the NORH protocol was followed. Outcome measures included death, emergency department readmission, neurosurgical intervention, delayed repeat HCT, and length of stay. RESULTS The NORH protocol was followed for 95 patients; 83% of the patients were male, the average age was 38 ± 16.0 years old, and the most common cause of trauma was assault (35%). Of the 95 patients in whom the NORH protocol was followed, 8 (8%) had a delayed repeat HCT study (> 24 hours) after admission, but none resulted in neurosurgical intervention because of progression of ICH. The average length of stay was 4 ± 7.2 days. None of the patients were readmitted to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of the NORH protocol (eliminating routine follow-up HCT) resulted in very low rates of delayed neurological deterioration, no late neurosurgical interventions resulting from ICH progression, very few emergency department revisits, and no readmissions. For a select group of MHI patients with ICH, the NORH protocol is safe and effective, and can reduce radiation exposure and costs.

Clinical outcomes in patients on preinjury ibuprofen with traumatic brain injury

BackgroundThe aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients on preinjury Ibuprofen with traumatic brain injury. MethodsWe performed a 2-year analysis of all patients on prehospital Ibuprofen with traumatic brain injury and intracranial hemorrhage. Patients on preinjury Ibuprofen were matched using propensity score matching to patients not on Ibuprofen in a 1:2 ratio for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, head-abbreviated injury scale, injury severity score, International Normalized Ratio, and neurologic examination. Outcome measures were progression on repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) and neurosurgical intervention. ResultsA total of 195 matched (Ibuprofen 65, no-Ibuprofen 130) patients were included. There was no difference in the progression on RHCT (Ibuprofen 18% vs no-Ibuprofen 24%; P = .50). The neurosurgical intervention rate was 18.9% (n = 37). There was no difference for need for neurosurgical intervention (26% vs 16%; P = .10) between the 2 groups. ConclusionsIn a matched cohort of trauma patients, preinjury Ibuprofen use was not associated with progression of initial intracranial hemorrhage and the need for neurosurgical intervention. Preinjury use of Ibuprofen as an independent variable should not warrant the need for a routine RHCT scan.

Role of routine repeat head imaging in paediatric traumatic brain injury

Paediatric traumatic brain injuries (TBI) remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Australia. There are clear guidelines on head imaging for children with TBI, but there is conflicting evidence on the role of routine repeat head computed tomography (CT) scan. This study aims to determine whether routine repeat head CT scans in paediatric TBI alter surgical or medical management. A retrospective study was performed at a level 1 tertiary paediatric trauma centre between January 2002 and July 2012. Patients with TBI who were admitted with acute intracranial injury and at least one repeat head CT scan were included. Mechanism of injury, severity of TBI, Glasgow Coma Score, use of intracranial pressure monitoring and operative procedures were listed. The need for operative management was compared for routine and clinically indicated head scans. Routine head CT scan was done in 36 out of 71 patients (51%). None from this group required craniotomy, but two children (6%) needed delayed ICP monitoring. Three patients with moderate to severe TBI required intracranial pressure monitor or external ventricular drain insertion based on a clinically indicated repeat head CT. Repeat head imaging is more likely to alter management of children with moderate to severe TBI. There is no role for routine repeat CT scan on mild TBI. Results of repeat cranial imaging should be correlated with the clinical status of the patient.

Clinical outcomes in traumatic brain injury patients on preinjury clopidogrel

Patients receiving antiplatelet medications are considered to be at an increased risk for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage after blunt head trauma. However, most studies have categorized all antiplatelet drugs into one category. The aim of our study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and the requirement of a repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) in patients on preinjury clopidogrel therapy. Patients with traumatic brain injury with intracranial hemorrhage on initial head CT were prospectively enrolled. Patients on preinjury clopidogrel were matched with patients exclusive of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy using a propensity score in a 1:1 ratio for age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), head Abbreviated Injury Scale (h-AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), neurologic examination, and platelet transfusion. Outcome measures were progression on RHCT scan and need for neurosurgical intervention. A total of 142 patients with intracranial hemorrhage on initial head CT scan (clopidogrel, 71; no clopidogrel, 71) were enrolled. The mean (SD) age was 70.5 (15.1) years, 66% were male, median GCS score was 14 (range, 3-15), and median h-AIS (ISS) was 3 (range, 2-5). The mean (SD) platelet count was 210 (101), and 61% (n = 86) of the patients received platelet transfusion. Patients on preinjury clopidogrel were more likely to have progression on RHCT (odds ratio [OR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-7.1) and RHCT as a result of clinical deterioration (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5). The overall rate of neurosurgical intervention was 4.2% (n = 6). Patients on clopidogrel therapy were more likely to require a neurosurgical intervention (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-3.1). Preinjury clopidogrel therapy is associated with progression of initial insult on RHCT scan and need for neurosurgical intervention. Preinjury clopidogrel therapy as an independent variable should warrant the need for a routine RHCT scan in patients with traumatic brain injury. Prognostic study, level I; therapeutic study, level II.

Repeat Head Computed Tomography in Anticoagulated Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: Still Warranted

Anticoagulation agents are proven risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of our study is to describe the epidemiology of prehospital coumadin, aspirin, and Plavix (CAP) patients with ICH and evaluate the use of repeat head computed tomography (CT) in this group. We performed a retrospective study from our trauma registry. All patients with intracranial hemorrhage on initial CT with prehospital CAP therapy were included. Demographics, CT scan findings, number of repeat CT scans, progressive findings, and neurosurgical intervention were abstracted. A comparison between prehospital CAP and no-CAP patients was done using χ(2) and Mann-Whitney U test. A total of 1606 patients with blunt TBI charts were reviewed of whom 508 patients had intracranial bleeding on initial CT scan and 72 were on prehospital CAP therapy. CAP patients were older (P < 0.001), had higher Injury Severity Score and head Abbreviated Injury Scores on admission (P < 0.001), were more likely to present with an abnormal neurologic examination (P = 0.004), and had higher hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay (P < 0.005). Eighty-four per cent of patients were on antiplatelet therapy and 27 per cent were on warfarin. The CAP patients have a threefold increase in the rate of worsening repeat head CT (26 vs 9%, P < 0.05). Prehospital CAP therapy is high risk for progression of bleeding on repeat head CT. Routine repeat head CT remains an important component in this patient population and can provide useful information.

230

Introduction: Delayed intracranial hemorrhage (DICH) is a recognized complication of blunt head trauma in anticoagulated patients even after initially negative head CT. The reported incidence and complication rate of delayed ICH is inconsistent in existing literature. Routine repeat head CT at 24–48 hours after admission is standard practice in many institutions. We postulate that in the anticoagulated blunt trauma patient, the incidence and complication rate of delayed ICH after an initially negative head CT is low and that routine repeat head CT is not warranted. Methods: The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to determine if a routine repeat CT scan is necessary for patients to identify new, DICH. Data were collected from 338 trauma patients with pre-admission history of any anticoagulant use (including low dose ASA), who had an initially negative head CT, followed by a repeat CT within 12–24 hours. Results: Our sample were 57.7% male, had a mean age of 69.3 (SD14.47). Nearly 55% of the sample had obvious head trauma by observation, 27.2% reported LOC, with an average GCS of 14.5 (SD1.97). DICH was identified in 2.4% (n=8) of the sample on follow-up head CT. All eight patients were taking ASA. Of the eight patients with DICH: 3 were on ASA only, 4 on ASA and Plavix, and 1 on ASA and Coumadin. None of the patients with ICH on repeat CT scan required any surgical intervention. Conclusions: The incidence of delayed ICH in our population was only 2.4% (8/338). Of these 8, none required clinical intervention and there were no mortalities. We identified no significant predictors of delayed ICH, but all were taking ASA either alone or in combination with another anticoagulant. This data suggests that, while a period of clinical follow up is advised, routine repeat head CT is unnecessary in patients who have an initially negative head CT even in the presence of chronic anticoagulant use. This study demonstrates similar incidence of delayed ICH to other studies but includes all forms and doses of anticoagulation.

Routine Repeat Head CT for Children with Traumatic Brain Injury Is Unwarranted

To evaluate efficacy of repeat head computed tomography (CT) in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), investigators retrospectively

Mild and moderate pediatric traumatic brain injury

Opinion is divided on the role of routine repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) for guiding clinical management in pediatric patients with blunt head trauma. We hypothesize that routine RHCT does not lead to change in management in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is a 3-year retrospective study of all patients of age 2 years to 18 years with blunt TBI admitted to our Level 1 trauma center with an abnormal head CT. Indications for RHCT (routine vs. neurologic deterioration) and their findings (progression or improvement) were recorded. Neurosurgical intervention was defined as extraventricular drain placement, craniectomy, or craniotomy. Primary outcome was a change in management after RHCT. A total of 291 pediatric patients were identified; of which 191 patients received an RHCT. Routine RHCT did not lead to neurosurgical intervention in the mild and moderate TBI group. In patients who received RHCT due to neurologic decline (n = 7), radiographic progression was seen on 85% of the patients (n = 6), with subsequent neurosurgical interventions in three patients. Two of these patients had a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of less than 8 at admission. Our study showed that the neurologic examination can be trusted and is reliable in pediatric blunt TBI patients in determining when an RHCT scan is necessary. We recommend that RHCT is required routinely in patients with intracranial hemorrhage with GCS score of 8 or less and in patients with GCS greater than 8 and that RHCT be performed only when there are clinical indications. Diagnostic/therapeutic study, level IV.

Low-dose aspirin therapy is not a reason for repeating head computed tomographic scans in traumatic brain injury: a prospective study

BackgroundMost studies have categorized all antiplatelet drugs into one category. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) and outcomes in patients on low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid; ASA) therapy. MethodsPatients with traumatic brain injury with intracranial hemorrhage on initial head computed tomography (CT) were prospectively enrolled. Patients on prehospital low-dose (81 mg) aspirin therapy were matched with patients exclusive of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy using propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, head Abbreviated Injury Scale score, Injury Severity Score, and neurological examination. Outcome measures were progression on RHCT and subsequent neurosurgical intervention. ResultsA total of 144 patients who had intracranial hemorrhage on initial CT scan (ASA group: 72; No-ASA group: 72) were enrolled. The mean age was 72.8 ± 11.7 years, 59.7% were male, and median head Abbreviated Injury Scale was 3 (2–3). There was no difference in progression on RHCT (25% in ASA versus 16.6% in no-ASA), change in management as a result of RHCT (1.4% versus 1.4%), RHCT as a result of neurological decline (0 versus 1.4%), discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (15 [14–15] versus 15 [14–15]), and mortality (0 versus 1.4%) between the two groups. ConclusionsLow-dose aspirin therapy is not associated with progression of initial insult on RHCT or clinical deterioration. Prehospital low-dose aspirin therapy as a sole criterion should not warrant a routine repeat head CT in traumatic brain injury.