Routine Assessment Of Patient Index Data 3 Scores Research Articles

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease Compared to Gout and Osteoarthritis.

Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease prevalence is similar to that of gout and osteoarthritis (OA), yet CPPD outcomes research greatly lags behind research in these other forms of arthritis. We compared validated patient-reported outcome measures in patients with CPPD vs gout and OA. Patients with CPPD were recruited from Brigham and Women's Hospital from 2018 to 2022. Presence of CPPD manifestations (acute calcium pyrophosphate [CPP] crystal arthritis, chronic CPP inflammatory arthritis, and/or OA with CPPD) was confirmed by medical record review. Baseline surveys included the Gout Assessment Questionnaire version 2.0, modified to ask about "pseudogout" rather than "gout"; Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID-3); and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). We compared responses in patients with CPPD against published gout and OA cohort studies. Among 47 patients with CPPD, the mean age was 71.9 years and 51% were female. Sixty-eight percent had at least 1 episode of acute CPP crystal arthritis, 40% had chronic CPP inflammatory arthritis, and 62% had OA with CPPD. Pain visual analog scale scores during a flare were similar in CPPD (mean 6.8 [SD 1.9]) and gout (mean 6.7 [SD 2.6]; P = 0.78). Patients with CPPD reported significantly greater unmet treatment need than patients with gout (P = 0.04). RAPID-3 scores in CPPD (mean 8.1 [SD 5.6]) were lower than in gout (mean 12.1 [SD 6.2]; P < 0.01) and similar in OA (mean 6.8 [SD 6.1]; P = 0.30). Patients with CPPD had significantly worse WOMAC stiffness scores than patients with mild OA, and significantly better WOMAC function scores than patients with severe OA. Patients with CPPD may experience pain comparable to that in gout and OA and reported substantial unmet treatment needs.

The impact of clinical pharmacist integration in a community rheumatology clinic.

To describe the benefits of pharmacist integration into a community rheumatology clinic in terms of clinical outcomes, patient and provider satisfaction, and clinic time efficiency. A 6-month study was conducted at a community rheumatology clinic to compare clinical and patient and provider satisfaction outcomes before and after a clinical pharmacist (CP) was integrated into the clinic staff to assist with providing medication counseling, ordering and monitoring laboratory tests, monitoring adverse effects and medication adherence, and titrating medication doses. The primary outcome was the change in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID-3) scores from baseline to 3 and 6 months after CP integration. Secondary outcomes included the change in monthly pain scores from baseline to 6 months, the change in patient satisfaction scores from baseline to 6 months, and time saved for the rheumatology providers after pharmacist integration into the clinic. The mean difference in RAPID-3 scores from baseline to 3 months (N = 55) was an improvement of 5.58 points (P < 0.001), while the mean change in weighted RAPID-3 scores was an improvement of 1.87 (P < 0.001). The mean change in RAPID-3 scores from baseline to 6 months (n = 25) was an improvement of 5.13 (P = 0.003), and the mean change in weighted RAPID-3 scores was 1.78 (P = 0.003). The results of this quality improvement project suggest that the integration of a CP in the rheumatology clinic improved patient-reported outcomes, as quantified by patients' pain scores and RAPID-3 scores. The integration of the CP also appeared to enhance patient and provider satisfaction.

Impact of specialty pharmacy collaboration with rheumatology clinics to improve the achievement of treat-to-target goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study

In rheumatoid arthritis, the use of Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) assessments to meet treat-to-target goals is endorsed by the 2021 American College of Rheumatology guidelines. In November 2020, the Baylor Scott & White specialty pharmacy implemented a new service that included more frequent collection of RAPID3 scores and standardized provider communication for patients co-managed by a Baylor Scott & White rheumatology clinic. The objective was to evaluate the impact of this new service on rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Before the new service started, patients followed a protocol of RAPID3 assessments that occurred every 6 months; once the service began, patients were followed using an algorithm in which patients with higher disease activity were contacted more frequently. Eighty-six percent of patients in the pre-intervention group (n = 7) compared with 100% of patients in the post-intervention group (n = 10) had high to moderate disease activity at baseline. Within a 6-month follow-up period in both groups, the percentage of high to moderate disease activity patients decreased by 30% in the post-intervention group and remained the same in the pre-intervention group. These results support the positive impact increased specialty pharmacy services may have on clinical outcomes; therefore, the continued expansion of these services should be considered.

Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Long-Term Upadacitinib Therapy in Five Randomized Controlled Trials.

IntroductionThe Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) is a patient-reported outcome tool recommended for the assessment of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice. This analysis evaluated the long-term effect of upadacitinib vs. comparators on RAPID3 scores in patients with RA in the phase 3 SELECT clinical trial program.MethodsThis post hoc analysis included data from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg once daily (QD) as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). The proportions of patients reporting RAPID3 remission (scores ≤ 3) were assessed at week 60. Correlations between absolute scores for RAPID3 and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and 28-joint Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) at week 60 were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients.ResultsA total of 3117 patients were included from the SELECT-NEXT, -BEYOND, -MONOTHERAPY, -COMPARE, and -EARLY trials. By week 60, 32–52% of methotrexate-naïve and csDMARD inadequate responder (IR) patients treated with either upadacitinib 15 mg QD or upadacitinib 30 mg QD reported RAPID3 scores consistent with remission. The proportions were slightly lower in the biologic DMARD-IR SELECT-BEYOND population (19–28%). RAPID3 scores highly correlated (Spearman correlation values ≥ 0.58) with CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28(CRP) scores through week 60 (all p < 0.001).ConclusionsUpadacitinib, as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs, was associated with patient-reported remission assessed by RAPID3 over 60 weeks across the SELECT RCTs in patients with RA.Trial registrationSELECT-BEYOND (NCT02706847); SELECT-NEXT (NCT02675426); SELECT-MONOTHERAPY (NCT02706951); SELECT-EARLY (NCT02706873); SELECT-COMPARE (NCT02629159).Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-022-00483-4.

Impact of Perceived Stress During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients' Disease Activity: An Online Survey.

Introduction/ObjectivesPsychological stress worsens rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity, and the COVID-19 pandemic has increased stress/anxiety in rheumatic patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if stress during the COVID-19 pandemic specifically impacts RA disease activity as reported by the patient.MethodThis was a cross-sectional COVID-19 RA survey study. University of California, Los Angeles rheumatology clinic patients were emailed a link to a survey in July and November 2020. The 30-question survey pertained to COVID-19–related stress, RA disease activity, and demographics. For the survey responders, anti–cyclic citrullinated antibody, rheumatoid factor, and age were extracted from the electronic health record. Analyses were performed to examine the association between the 4-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4) and other COVID-19–related stress measures with the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3).ResultsA total of 1138/5037 subjects completed the emailed survey (22.6% response rate). When examining responses across RAPID3 categories (near remission, low, moderate, and high disease severity), there were significant increases in PSS-4 and other stress variables. Multiple linear regression models showed that PSS-4, financial stress, age, seropositivity, disease duration, and Black race were independently associated with worsened RAPID3 scores, when controlling for other confounding factors.ConclusionsThis study suggests that stress overall negatively impacts RAPID3, and Black RA patients had a higher RAPID3 scores during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite colossal efforts to combat the pandemic, RA patients currently suffer from stress/anxiety, and methods to mitigate these psychological effects are needed.

Correlation of patient‐reported routine assessment of patient index data with clinical measures of disease activity in psoriatic arthritis

AimA treat‐to‐target strategy is recommended for management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), although there is lack of agreement regarding the best measure of disease activity to target. Physician assessments included in traditional indices can be complex and time consuming to complete and cannot be readily conducted by telehealth. This study compares the routine assessment of patient index data 3 (RAPID3), an efficient tool comprising patient self‐assessment, with traditional clinician‐led composite measures in the PsA clinic setting.MethodsData were collected prospectively from July 2016 to March 2020 in 2 dedicated PsA clinics in Sydney, Australia. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was created for comparison of RAPID3 score with composite scores minimal disease activity (MDA), very low disease activity (VLDA) and disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA) in low disease activity or remission.ResultsNinety‐three patients had simultaneous collection of RAPID3 and MDA measures. Mean (SD) age was 49.9 (13.5) years, 50.5% were male and 23 (24.7%) had erosive disease at baseline. RAPID3 scores ≤3.2 and ≤2.7 (range 0‐30) had high sensitivity and specificity for VLDA and DAPSA remission respectively, with ROC curve area under the curve (95% CI) of 0.94 (0.91‐0.97) and 0.96 (0.93‐0.99).ConclusionRAPID3 has good agreement with physician‐led composite scores of MDA, VLDA and DAPSA, and provides a viable alternative to composite scores. This is particularly helpful in settings that do not allow for clinical examination, for example telehealth.

Safety of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Rheumatology Patients.

Recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is Food and Drug Administration approved for the prevention of herpes zoster (shingles) in adults 50 years old and older. Immunocompromised subjects were excluded from the pivotal vaccine trials. We studied the safety of this vaccine in our university-affiliated rheumatology practice. This was a single-center, retrospective study focusing on subjects who received RZV during 2018. We collected the demographic data, any self-reported adverse events after vaccination, C-reactive protein, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) scores for subjects with rheumatoid arthritis, and available RAPID3 scores for all study subjects before and after the vaccination. Comparision of C-reactive protein (n = 40), RAPID3 scores for subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 16), and available RAPID3 scores for all subjects (n = 21) using the paired t test, did not show significant differences before and after the administration of RZV. A total of 6.4% of patients reported adverse events after vaccination. The adverse events were mild and did not lead to hospitalization, end organ damage, or change in treatment plan. The RZV was safe and well tolerated among our study population.

Outcomes and Quality of Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis With or Without Video Telemedicine Follow-Up Visits.

Telemedicine has been proposed to improve access to care in rheumatology, but few studies of telerheumatology have been published. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes and quality of care for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients seen by video telemedicine follow-up compared to in-person only. Individuals in the Alaska Tribal Health System with a diagnosis of RA were recruited when seeing a rheumatologist either in-person or by video telemedicine, both of which were offered as part of usual follow-up care. At baseline, participants completed the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) questionnaire and a telemedicine perception survey and agreed to medical record review. Participants repeated surveys by telephone at 6 and 12 months, and medical record abstraction was performed at 12 months for quality measures. At the 12-month outcome assessment, 63 of 122 RA patients (52%) had ever used telemedicine for RA. In univariate analysis, functional status improved over 12 months in the telemedicine group. In multivariate analysis, RAPID3 score and functional status were associated with telemedicine group (higher), with no statistically significant change over the 12-month period. The only quality measure that differed between groups at 12 months in univariate analysis was the proportion of visits in which disease activity was documented (higher in the in-person group, 40% versus 25%; P = 0.02), but this was not significant after multivariate analysis. In short-term follow-up, there was no significant difference in most outcome and quality measures in patients with RA who incorporated telemedicine follow-up in their care compared to in-person only.

POS0670 ROUTINE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT INDEX DATA 3 (RAPID3) IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS TREATED WITH LONG-TERM UPADACITINIB THERAPY

Background:Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) is a pooled index of 3 patient-reported measures: patient global assessment, pain, and physical function. RAPID3 was shown to correlate with other composite measures of disease activity1 and is recommended by the American College of Rheumatology for use in clinical practice.2Objectives:To evaluate the impact of upadacitinib (UPA) versus comparators on RAPID3 over 60 weeks, as well as the correlation of RAPID3 scores with other disease measures in the UPA phase 3 SELECT clinical program.Methods:This post hoc analysis included placebo-controlled (SELECT-NEXT, -BEYOND, and -COMPARE) and active comparator-controlled (SELECT-EARLY, -MONOTHERAPY, and -COMPARE) trials. Patients received UPA as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Mean change from baseline in RAPID3 and the proportion of patients reporting RAPID3 remission (≤3), low (LDA, &gt;3 to ≤6), moderate (MDA, &gt;6 to ≤12), and high disease activity (HDA, &gt;12) were assessed. Correlations between absolute scores for RAPID3 and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and 28-joint Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients. All data are as observed.Results:A total of 661, 498, 648, 1629, and 945 patients were included from SELECT-NEXT, -BEYOND, -MONOTHERAPY, -COMPARE, and -EARLY. At baseline, the majority of patients across all studies were in RAPID3 HDA (mean baseline RAPID3 [across all studies], 17.2–19.2) (Table 1 and Figure 1). Improvements from baseline in RAPID3 were observed with UPA 15 mg and 30 mg through Week 60, with numerically greater improvements observed with UPA compared with active comparators (Table 1). Across studies, mean improvements in RAPID3 exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) with UPA and adalimumab (ADA) treatment (MCID=3.83). By Week 60, approximately one-half of UPA-treated patients were in RAPID3 remission or LDA, with only 10–25% remaining in HDA, except for the more refractory population in SELECT-BEYOND, in which ~38% of patients remained in HDA (Figure 1). RAPID3 scores moderately to strongly correlated with CDAI (ρ=0.69–0.83), SDAI (ρ=0.69–0.82), and DAS28(CRP) (ρ=0.58–0.77), across all studies, at Week 60 (all p&lt;0.001).Conclusion:UPA, as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs, was associated with improvements in patient-reported disease activity, pain, and physical function, as assessed by RAPID3 over 60 weeks in the phase 3 SELECT clinical program. RAPID3 continues to be an important tool in clinical practice to assess disease activity, as it was shown to correlate to other disease activity measures and allows for rapid scoring.

Dairy Consumption: Does It Make an Impact on Self-Reported Disease Activity of Inflammatory Arthritis?

BackgroundAs researchers and the public become more cognizant of the impacts of diet and nutrition on health, continued research is needed to provide evidence to support dietary claims. At present, there exists mixed reporting on the effects of dairy consumption and disease activity of inflammatory arthritis (IA).ObjectiveThis study attempts to advance current research on the relationship between dairy consumption and self-reported disease activity in patients with IA and to investigate whether dietary modifications can be helpful as a conservative, cost-effective, and accessible supplement to established treatments.MethodsParticipants completed a modified diet history questionnaire (DHQ), which assessed dairy consumption over the past year, and a Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) questionnaire, which assessed a participants’ self-reported inflammatory disease activity. DHQ and RAPID3 were analyzed using a Pearson product-moment partial correlation to assess variables’ relationships. Participants completed the questionnaire in the setting of a rheumatology clinic. Two hundred and four participants were recruited for this study. All of the participants were at least 18 years of age, capable of giving informed consent, and were formally diagnosed with either rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis by a board-certified rheumatologist. ResultsThe results from the questionnaires found that dairy consumption does not contribute to self-reported IA disease activity. While 11 of the 16 DHQ variables maintained a positive correlation with the overall RAPID3 scores, none of these possessed statistical significance. Only when controlling for age and sex did the study find two statistically significant variable correlations between the quantity of milk consumed as a beverage (r=0.147, n=193, p=0.043) and milk added to cereal (r=0.170, n=189, p=0.019) with the RAPID3 scores.ConclusionIn summation, the study found no notable correlation between dairy consumption and patients’ self-reported IA disease activity.

Markers of disease severity and positive family history are associated to significant risk perception in rheumatoid arthritis, while compliance with therapy is not: a cross-sectional study in 415 Mexican outpatients

BackgroundAssessing risk perception (RP) helps explain how rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients integrate their ideas concerning the disease and how this understanding affects their self-care management. Compliance with treatment impacts disease-related outcomes and could be associated with RP to variable degrees and at different levels. The primary objective was to determine a potential association between RP and compliance with therapy in RA outpatients and to identify additional factors. The secondary objective was to identify factors associated with judgment bias such as unrealistic RP.Patients and methodsBetween January 2018 and June 2019, 450 consecutive outpatients who received RA-related treatment were invited to a face-to-face interview to obtain socio-demographic data, RA-related information, comorbidities, and the following outcomes: adherence, persistence, and concordance with medications assessed with a questionnaire locally designed; RP with the RP questionnaire (RPQ); disease activity with the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data-3 (RAPID-3); disability with the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI); quality of life with Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) instrument; pain and overall disease with the respective visual analogue scale (VAS); and health literacy assessed with 3 questions. Significant RP was defined according to a cut-off based on the 75th percentile value of the sample in which the RPQ was validated. Unrealistic RP was defined based on the coincidence of the presence/absence of significant RP and less/more than 7 unfavorable medical criteria. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used. Patients provided written informed consent and the study received Internal Review Board approval.ResultsThere were 415 patients included, primarily middle-aged women with long-standing disease and moderate disease activity. Almost half of the patients were receiving corticosteroids and 15.9% intensive RA-related treatment. There were 44.1% of the patients concordant with treatment and 22.6% had significant RP. The patients’ treatment behavior was not retained in the regression analysis; meanwhile, rheumatoid nodes, surgical joint replacement, family history of RA, and higher RAPID-3 score were associated with significant RP. There were 56 patients with unrealistic RP; significant RP and more unfavorable medical criteria were associated with unrealistic RP.ConclusionsCompliance with therapy was not associated with significant RP in RA outpatients.

The Clinical Disease Activity Index and the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 for Achievement of Treatment Strategies.

To compare the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) with the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) from 2 large United States registries. Using a cross section of clinic visits within 2 registries, we determined whether the outcome of each metric would place the patient in remission (REM), low (LDA), moderate (MDA), or high disease activity (HDA) using the CDAI, with the assumption that a patient in MDA or HDA would be a candidate for acceleration of treatment. We identified significant disparities between the 2 indices in final disease categorization using each index system. For patients identified in LDA by CDAI, RAPID3 identified 20.4% and 28.3% as LDA in Corrona and the Brigham and Women's Rheumatoid Arthritis Sequential Study (BRASS), respectively. For patients identified as MDA by CDAI, RAPID3 identified 36.2% and 31.1% as MDA in Corrona and BRASS, respectively, with the greatest disparities within each system identified for LDA and MDA activity by the CDAI (20.4% and 36.2% agreement of RAPID3 with CDAI, respectively, in Corrona and 28.3% and 31.1% agreement in BRASS). Overall comparison between CDAI and RAPID3 in the 4 disease categories resulted in estimated κ = 0.285 in both. The RAPID3 scores indicated the potential for treat-to-target acceleration in 34.4% of patients in REM or LDA based on CDAI in Corrona and 27.7% in BRASS, respectively. The RAPID3, based on patient-reported outcomes, shows differences with CDAI categories of disease activity. The components of CDAI are not highly correlated with RAPID3, except for patient global assessment. These differences could significantly affect the decision to advance treatment when using a treat-to-target regimen.

Prevalence of Anxiety, Depression, Sleep Disturbance, Fibromyalgia, Obesity, and Gastroesophageal Disease in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases.

Patients with rheumatologic disorders often have comorbidities that complicate their psychological well-being. In this study, we looked at 216 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and Sjogren's syndrome (SS) to determine the prevalence of anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, fibromyalgia (FM), obesity (BMI greater than 23), and gastroesophageal disease (GERD) and the correlation between FM, BMI, disease activity measure, known as Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3). Study participants were 216 rheumatology patients seen at the UCF Pegasus Health Clinic from November 2011 to May 2014 with one or more of the following diseases: RA, SS, SLE, or PsA. 116 had rheumatoid arthritis, 27 with systemic lupus erythematous, 22 with psoriatic arthritis, 20 with Sjogren's syndrome, and 31 with more than one diagnosis. Variables that were collected from patients' charts included RAPID3 scores, patient demographics (age, sex), BMI, presence of GERD, and presence of FM. Each patient was randomly assigned, unique and had an unidentifiable study number. Anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and obesity were found to be more prevalent in patients with Sjogren's syndrome, and fibromyalgia was noted to be more prevalent in patients with more than 1 diagnosis. The presence of fibromyalgia was significantly correlated with higher RAPID3 scores in all patients except those with PsA. Significant correlation among higher BMI and greater RAPID3 scores was found for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and for patients with Sjogren's syndrome. Our study showed an increased prevalence of anxiety in patients with Sjogren's syndrome. Fibromyalgia was found to be related to higher disease activity scores. In RA and SS patients, BMI was significantly correlated with higher RAPID3 scores. These results provide a basis for future studies to evaluate these correlations in more detail.

Factors Associated With Use of Telemedicine for Follow-up of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Telemedicine is increasingly being offered to patients for rheumatology care, but few studies have examined factors associated with telemedicine use or outcomes of telemedicine in rheumatology. The objective of this analysis was to determine factors associated with the use of video telemedicine when offered as part of usual care for follow-up of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Individuals in the Alaska Tribal Health System with a diagnosis of RA were recruited when seeing a rheumatologist either in-person or by video telemedicine, both of which were offered as part of usual care. At the study visit, participants completed the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) and a telemedicine perception survey and agreed to a medical record review for demographics and disease characteristics. Data from this visit were analyzed to determine factors associated with using telemedicine for RA, compared to being seen in-person only. Of 122 participants enrolled in the study, 56 (46%) had been seen by telemedicine at least once. Factors associated with telemedicine use in univariate analysis included a higher RAPID3 score, a higher number of rheumatologist visits in the preceding year, more positive perceptions of telemedicine, and seeing a physician who used telemedicine more often. On multivariate analysis, these 4 factors all remained significant. Demographic and other disease-related factors or comorbidities were not associated with telemedicine use. When offered as an option for rheumatology care, video telemedicine was more likely to be used by RA patients with higher disease activity and more positive perceptions of telemedicine, and by patients whose physicians used telemedicine more often.

Birth Outcomes and Disease Activity During Pregnancy in a Prospective Cohort of Women With Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis.

To add to data on adverse birth outcomes accounting for disease activity in women with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data were analyzed from women enrolled in the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists Autoimmune Disease Project from 2004 to 2018. Disease activity was measured according to the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) or Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) scores. Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for selected adverse pregnancy outcomes. Compared to healthy controls (n = 717), women with PsA (n = 117) were at increased risk for moderate preterm delivery (32-36 weeks' gestation) (ARR 1.81, 95% CI 1.01-3.26), oligohydramnios (ARR 3.79, 95% CI 1.34-10.74), and cesarean delivery (ARR 1.63, 95% CI 1.26-2.12). Women with AS (n = 129) had an increased risk of delivering infants requiring intensive care (ARR 1.67, 95% CI 1.05-2.67). A high HAQ score at 32 weeks was associated with preterm delivery in women with PsA (ARR 3.82, 95% CI 1.51-9.67). In women with AS, a high RAPID3 score was associated with cesarean delivery (ARR 5.82, 95% 1.06-31.78), and second trimester glucocorticoid use was associated with preterm delivery (ARR 4.41, 95% CI 1.57-12.41). Women with PsA and AS have increased risk for selected adverse pregnancy outcomes. Active disease and use of glucocorticoids may increase the risk for some adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with these conditions.

AB0354 STEPPING UP FOR INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS: A PILOT TRIAL TO TEST BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS STRATEGY TO INCREASE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS

Background:Regular physical activity may have benefits for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but patients with active disease are often reluctant to increase activity. Principles from behavioral economics (BE), a field combining psychology and economics, have been applied to motivate increased physical activity in non-arthritis patients.1No published studies have examined the application of BE concepts in rheumatology to promote exercise.Objectives:To assess the feasibiility and efficacy of a loss aversion financial incentive for increasing step counts and improving disease symptoms in RA and PsA patients with active disease.Methods:A randomized controlled pilot trial was performed among patients with RA and PsA. Participants were required to have active disease defined by having at least one swollen joint and a Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data-3 (RAPID3) score&gt;3 (range 0-30 with &lt;3 indicating remission). The trial included two visits (baseline and 14-week) and weekly check-ins via virtual trial platforms, Way to Health and the ArthritisPower app. Patients were given a Fitbit Alta at baseline and completed a two-week run-in period to assess average step count. Patients were then prompted to select a step count goal and complete a commitment contract. After selection of a goal, participants randomized to the intervention arm received a financial loss aversion incentive (each month, patients started with $75 in their account and lost $2.50 for each day they did not reach their goal). Patients were blinded to the other study arm and investigators were blinded to assignment. All patients received weekly text message prompts providing feedback about their performance over the previous week, completed weekly PROs, and had the opportunity to report adverse events including flares of joint pain. After 12 weeks of the intervention (at week 14), the incentive was removed and patients were followed to 26 weeks to determine how long the effect persisted.Results:In the pilot trial, 71 patients were verbally consented for screening, 34 underwent screening (of these, two were ineligible), 27 were randomized, and 22 patients completed the 14-week study visit. Mean age of participants was 50 (SD 13), 85% were female, 17(63%) had PsA, mean BMI was 30.6 and mean swollen (0-66) and tender (0-68) joint counts were 6.2 (5.6) and 8.1 (9.1), respectively. Baseline RAPID3 was 10.5 (SD 4.6) and the mean step count at baseline was 5,962. By 28 days, 65% of patients increased their step count. Participants receiving the incentive had an average of 714 more steps per day over the first 14 weeks and a greater probability of reaching 10,000 steps per day during follow-up (30% v. 21%, p=0.41). Among patients who achieved their step count goals more than 50% of days, we observed more improvement in sleep quality, fatigue, and overall well-being (p&lt;0.05) (Figure 1). After adjusting for baseline RAPID3, the 14-week RAPID3 scores were lower in the group that achieved their step goals 50% of the time [B: -3.91 (-11.8, 3.99); a difference that approximates the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the RAPID3 (3.6).Figure 1.Change in fatigue severity among those with greater adherence to step count goals.Conclusion:While financial incentives have worked well in patients without arthritis, the estimated effect of the financial incentive in this small study was more modest in patients with RA and PsA. Those that were able to increase their physical activity and meet their step goals had greater improvements in symptoms over the course of the study. These data support further study in this area to promote physical activity by leveraging concepts from behavioral economics.

Improving Quality of Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis Through Mobile Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement: Focus Group Study

BackgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) for chronic disease management can be integrated into the routine workflow by leveraging mobile technology.ObjectiveThe objective of our study was to describe the process of our quality improvement (QI) efforts using tablets for PRO collection in a busy, academic rheumatology practice to support a treat-to-target (TTT) approach for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management.MethodsOur QI team designed a process for routine collection of PROs for RA patients at the Arthritis Center, employing information technology and an electronic medical record (EMR) system. Patients received a tablet at the clinic check-in desk to complete the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) survey, a validated RA PRO. RAPID3 scores were uploaded to the EMR in real time and available for use in shared decision making during routine office visits. Weekly data were collected on RAPID3 completion rates and shared with front desk staff and medical assistants to drive improvement. Patients in our patient family advisory council and focus groups provided informal feedback on the process.ResultsFrom May 1, 2017, to January 31, 2019, a total of 4233 RAPID3 surveys were completed by 1691 patients. The mean age of patients was 63 (SD 14) years; 84.00% (1420/1691) of the patients were female, and 83.00% (1403/1691) of the patients were white. The rates of RAPID3 completion increased from 14.3% (58/405) in May 2017 to 68.00% (254/376) in September 2017 and were sustained over time through January 2019. Informal feedback from patients was positive and negative, relating to the usability of the tablet and the way rheumatologists used and explained the RAPID3 data in shared decision making during the office visit.ConclusionsWe designed a sustainable and reliable process for collecting PROs from patients with RA in the waiting room and integrated these data through the EMR during office visits.

A Proposal to Standardize Low Disease Activity Criteria in Rheumatoid Arthritis Based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Minimal Disease Activity Definition.

ObjectiveWe aimed to standardize the definition of low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) group's proposed definition of minimal disease activity.MethodBased on a nationwide RA database, we proposed new Boolean low disease activity criteria using OMERACT's core set definition of minimal disease activity that requires the fulfillment of at least five of the following seven core set measures: a pain score of 2 or less, a swollen joint count (SJC28) of 1 or fewer, a tender joint count of 1 or fewer, a Health Assessment Questionnaire score of 0.5 or less, a Physician's Global Assessment score of 1.5 or less, a Patient's Global Assessment score of 2 or less, and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 20 mm/h or less. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we determined the cutoffs for the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)–ESR.ResultsOf 8298 patients, 56.2% met the proposed Boolean low disease activity criteria. We determined an SDAI score of 5.5 or less and a CDAI score of 5 or less to be the new cutoffs, and we chose a DAS28 of 2.85 or less (the original cutoff for DAS‐based minimal disease activity) and a RAPID3 score of 6 or less (the original cutoff for RAPID3‐based low disease activity) with or without a swollen joint count (SJC) (SJC of 2 or fewer) as the cutoffs for DAS28 and RAPID3. The agreement between the new cutoffs for DAS28 of 2.85 or less vs. CDAI score of 5 or less, CDAI score of 5 or less vs. RAPID3 score of 6 or less (with SJC of 2 or fewer), and DAS28 of 2.85 or less vs. RAPID3 score of 6 or less (with SJC of 2 or fewer), was 0.619, 0.612 (0.702), and 0.474 (0.531), respectively.Conclusion OMERACT's minimal disease activity definition may be used to standardize the criteria for low disease activity.

P277 Assessment of disease activity using RAPID3 and evaluation of treatment effect of guselkumab in patients with PsA: results from a randomised placebo-controlled Phase 2 clinical trial

Abstract Background To evaluate the effect of guselkumab (GUS) on Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods In a Phase 2 trial, patients with active PsA and ≥3% body surface area of plaque psoriasis despite current or previous treatment with standard-of-care therapies, including anti-TNFα agents, were randomized 2:1 to receive GUS 100 mg (n = 100) or placebo (PBO, n = 49) subcutaneously at weeks 0, 4, and every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter through W44. At W16, patients from either group with &amp;lt;5% improvement from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts were eligible for early escape to open label ustekinumab. At W24, all remaining PBO patients crossed over to receive GUS 100 mg, and then received GUS at W28 and q8w thereafter through W44. RAPID3 (0-30) is derived from the Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and numerical rating scales (0-10) for pain and patient global assessment. A change of 5.1 in RAPID3 score was identified as the minimally important difference (MID) in PsA, and RAPID3 ≤3.0 was used to define PsA remission. Change in RAPID3 and proportion of patients achieving MID were compared between treatments. Correlations of RAPID3 scores with the PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), GRACE index, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), and Modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI) were evaluated using Spearman correlation. Results The mean (SD) RAPID3 score at baseline was 16.9 (5.19). At W24, patients in the GUS group (n = 100) achieved statistically significantly greater decrease from baseline (improvement) in RAPID3 (-5.81 ± 6.0) than the PBO group (n = 49) (-0.57 ± 5.1, p &amp;lt; 0.001), and 50% of patients in the GUS group vs 20.4% in the PBO group achieved an MID (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Higher RAPID3 remission rate in the GUS than the PBO group (14.0% vs 2.4%, p = 0.022) was observed. The mean ± SD decrease from baseline in RAPID3 was -6.36 ± 6.2 at W24, and -7.48 ± 6.3 at W44 in those who continued GUS (n = 86). Among patients who switched from PBO to GUS at W24 (n = 28), mean ± SD change from baseline (improvement) in RAPID3 was -2.28 ± 5.2 at W24 while on placebo and -7.60 ± 6.6 at W44 after switching to GUS. The RAPID3 score was highly correlated with PASDAS (r = 0.84, p &amp;lt; 0.001), GRACE index (r = 0.89, p &amp;lt; 0.001), DAPSA (r = 0.77 p &amp;lt; 0.001) and mCPDAI (r = 0.65, p &amp;lt; 0.001) at W16. Conclusion GUS-treated PsA patients demonstrated significant improvement in RAPID3 compared to PBO. RAPID3 is simple and feasible to use in routine clinical care, and it correlates well with other comprehensive PsA-specific disease activity measures. Disclosures A. Deodhar: Other; A.D. has been a study investigator for Janssen. B. Kirkham: Other; B.K. has been a study investigator for Janssen. P. Rahman: Other; P.R. has been a study investigator for Janssen. P. Helliwell: Other; P.H. has been a study investigator for Janssen. A.B. Gottlieb: Other; A.G. has been a study investigator for Janssen. W. Boehncke: Other; W.B. has been a study investigator for Janssen. X.L. Xu: Other; X.X. is a Janssen employee. P.C. Gorecki: Other; P.G. is a Janssen employee. C. Han: Other; C.H. is a Janssen employee.

Assessing Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity With Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures Using Digital Technology.

Health information technology has enabled efficient measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is becoming more widely adopted for research and routine care, and some PROMIS instruments might be substituted for lengthier, legacy PRO instruments. Four PROMIS computer-adaptive testing (CAT) instruments (pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and fatigue) and the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), along with pain intensity and patient global assessment score, were administered to participants in the ArthritisPower registry. The RAPID3 was predicted using different combinations of these variables to create a new score (CAT-PROMIS RAPID3). Kappa statistics and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were used to measure agreement between the observed versus predicted RAPID3. A total of 6,154 eligible patients contributed 11,275 observations. The mean ± SD age was 52.7 ± 10.5years, and 93% of patients were women. The median assessment times ranged from 29 seconds (PROMIS sleep disturbance) to 116 seconds (RAPID3). As single pairwise comparisons, the PROMIS CATs examined were modestly correlated (r approximately 0.4-0.7) to one other and RAPID3. Together with the pain intensity and patient global assessment, the PROMIS instruments explained a high fraction of total variance (R2 = 0.97) of the RAPID3 score. In the model with the highest agreement (κ = 0.93) between the observed RAPID3 and the CAT-PROMIS predicted RAPID3, Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement showed minimal residual differences and no systematic biases. There was excellent agreement between the observed RAPID3 and predicted RAPID3 scores estimated using several PROMIS instruments. The Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire and patient global assessment components of RAPID3 may be unnecessary if PROMIS scores are available.