Ross Procedure Research Articles

The Ross operation

The Ross operation

Abstract 4137869: Ross Procedure for Correction of Congenitally Unicuspid Aortic Valve: A Paradigm Shift?

Case 1: A 54-yr-old man reported exertional dyspnea for 3 months, with a systolic murmur on exam. TTE noted severe aortic stenosis, moderate insufficiency and possible bicuspid valve morphology. Coronary angiogram showed no obstructive disease. CT chest showed a 5-cm ascending aortic aneurysm. CT surgery evaluation was sought, and patient had a Ross procedure with aortic hemiarch repair. Intra-operative TEE confirmed a congenitally unicommissural, unicuspid aortic valve (UAV). A 7-month follow-up TTE showed a normal aortic and pulmonic prosthetic gradient. Case 2: A 46-yr-old lady reported progressive exercise intolerance, with a systolic murmur and faint S2 noted on exam. TTE showed severe aortic stenosis. MR angiogram showed a unicuspid valve and a mildly dilated aortic root. The patient was evaluated by CT surgery and underwent Ross procedure. TTE 4 years later showed a normal aortic and a moderately elevated pulmonic prosthetic gradient. Patient continues to exercise without limitations. Discussion: UAV is a rare entity with an incidence of 0.02%. It has a bimodal distribution, in infants and adults, with the unicommissural type more common in adults. Due to rapid progression of valvular disease, the mean age at diagnosis is 42 years. Concurrent aortic dilatation is present in 48% patients. Management of UAV is a matter of ongoing investigation. Classically, young patients with aortic valve disease underwent mechanical AVR. Ross procedure was under-utilized due to concerns about the surgical complexity and potential need for re-operation of the aortic and pulmonic grafts. However, recent studies show promising results. Patients with UAV have lower reoperation rates after a Ross procedure compared to a repair alone. Furthermore, a Ross procedure confers mortality benefit over mechanical AVR with no significant difference in immediate perioperative complications and mortality, although, this needs further investigation in a UAV cohort. Our cases support the feasibility of a Ross procedure for UAV, in providing a durable solution while avoiding anticoagulation in young patients. As Ross procedure is performed in limited centers, patients with UAV should be referred to such centers for definitive management.

External Scaffold for Strengthening the Pulmonary Autograft in the Ross Procedure

Despite offering several potential benefits over standard prosthetic aortic valve replacement, the use of the pulmonary autograft has been limited to date due to concerns over the risk of pulmonary autograft expansion and the need for reintervention. Several techniques using materials with biomimetic potential have been developed to reduce this complication. The incidence, risk factors, and pathophysiology of pulmonary autograft dilatation are discussed in this article. This seminar will provide an overview of the techniques of external pulmonary autograft support and their advantages and limitations. It also considers future directions for further investigation and future clinical applications of external pulmonary autograft support. Dilatation of the autograft is more likely to occur in patients with aortic regurgitation and a dilated aortic annulus. External scaffolding may prevent autograft stretching and expansion in these specific cases. However, from a biomimetic point of view, any permanent scaffold potentially restricts the movement of the autograft root. This reduces some of the benefits associated with the use of autologous tissue, which is the priority of the Ross procedure. To address this issue, several bioresorbable matrices could be used to support the root during its initial adaptive phase. Control of blood pressure with aggressive therapy is the first line to avoid this problem in the first year after pulmonary autograft implantation, together with support of the annular and sinotubular junction in some selected cases. This is the best way to maintain stable autograft root dimensions while preserving root dynamics. However, to determine the efficacy of this combined external support and best medical management, it is important to perform regular imaging and clinical follow-up.

Impact of aortic and pulmonary artery wall histology on radicular dilatation during the Ross procedure

ObjectiveIn our study, we aim to explore the structural differences between the aortic root and the pulmonary artery to better understand the process of pulmonary autograft dilatation during the Ross procedure.Materials and methodsWe studied twenty human fetuses (aged 14–36 weeks of gestation) and four adults (one female and three males, aged 30–45 years, mean age = 37 ± 16 years). Samples of aortic root and pulmonary artery were obtained through dissection. Histological examinations, including hematoxylin–eosin, Masson’s trichrome, and orcein staining, as well as immunohistochemical technique with caldesmon staining, were performed. Microscopic counting was conducted to assess the number of elastic laminae and smooth muscle cells in each arterial wall. Statistical analyses were performed using R software. Means and standard deviations were used to present central tendencies and data dispersion for elastic laminae and smooth muscle.ResultsSignificant histological differences were observed between the aortic root and pulmonary artery in both adults and fetuses. In fetuses, no difference was found between the two vessels in terms of elastic laminae (p = 0.26) and smooth muscle cells (p = 0.69). However, in adults, significant differences were found for elastic laminae (p < 0.001) and smooth muscle cells (p < 0.001) between the aorta and pulmonary artery.ConclusionsThe microscopic vascular structure impacts the mechanical properties of the pulmonary autograft wall and explains its observed dilatation remote from the Ross procedure due to wall stresses related to systemic pressure.

Assessing aortic morphology post aortic valve replacement using unsupervised hierarchical clustering and statistical shape modelling

Abstract Introduction There are different surgical procedures used to treat aortic valve disease such as aortic valve replacement (AVR), the Ozaki procedure, the Ross procedure, and the valve-sparing procedure. There may be postoperative side effects associated with aortic morphology. Computational analyses that assess morphology are thus necessary in such scenario. Statistical shape modelling is used to assess three-dimensional morphology, discover unique shape features, create mean shapes, and create shape modes that display morphological variability. Hierarchical cluster analysis is a machine learning method used to classify a population into subgroups. Both of these statistical methods were applied to aortic valve replacement patients to evaluate morphological variability after aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery. Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess the aortic morphology of AVR patients, identify morphological differences between different surgical procedures, identify subgroups postoperatively using statistical shape modelling and hierarchical cluster analysis, and assessing possible correlations between the resultant clusters and function i.e. ejection fraction. Methods Computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance images were used to reconstruct aortas into 3D models using segmentation and 3D reconstruction software. For each patient, two models were created (i.e. ascending aorta only and aorta including the arch and the descending aorta). N=35 patients were included in the study. Statistical shape analysis was run to create templates and shape modes. Statistical environment and language software was used to run hierarchical cluster analysis. Results Overall, the hierarchical cluster analysis did not classify the aortas based on type of surgery, but most patients in the Ross group demonstrated morphological differences from the other surgical groups and many of the aortas belonging to the Ross group were clustered together in both clustering analyses. No significant differences between clusters were seen (p=0.47 for ascending, p=0.19 for whole aorta). No correlation was found between clusters and ejection fraction (p=0.75, r2&amp;lt;0.01), possibly indicating that post-AVR aortic morphology in this sample does not reflect overt functional changes. Conclusion Both statistical shape modelling and hierarchical cluster analyses were successful in assessing morphological variability and identifying subgroups in this population. This framework could therefore be extended to larger samples to inform on surgical decision-making allowing surgeons to choose the appropriate surgery for the patient or design prosthetic valves that are more customised to the patient’s anatomy.Cluster-Ejection Fraction Correlation

Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Children and Young Adults for Cardiologists and Cardiac Surgeons: State-of-the-Art of Literature Review.

Bicuspid aortic valve disease is the most prevalent congenital heart disease, affecting up to 2% of the general population. The presentation of symptoms may vary based on the patient's anatomy of fusion, with transthoracic echocardiography being the primary diagnostic tool. Bicuspid aortic valves may also appear with concomitant aortopathy, featuring fundamental structural changes which can lead to valve dysfunction and/or aortic dilatation over time. This article seeks to give a comprehensive overview of the presentation, treatment possibilities and long-term effects of this condition. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched using the terms "endocarditis" or "bicuspid aortic valve" in combination with "epidemiology", "pathogenesis", "manifestations", "imaging", "treatment", or "surgery" to retrieve relevant articles. We have identified two types of bicuspid aortic valve disease: aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation. Valve replacement or repair is often necessary. Patients need to be informed about the benefits and drawbacks of different valve substitutes, particularly with regard to life-long anticoagulation and female patients of childbearing age. Depending on the expertise of the surgeon and institution, the Ross procedure may be a viable alternative. Management of these patients should take into account the likelihood of somatic growth, risk of re-intervention, and anticoagulation risks that are specific to the patient, alongside the expertise of the surgeon or centre. Further research is required on the secondary prevention of patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), such as lifestyle advice and antibiotics to prevent infections, as the guidelines are unclear and lack strong evidence.

Durability of Right Ventricular Conduits in the Ross Procedure

ObjectivesRight ventricular (RV) conduit availability and degeneration are potential limitations of the Ross procedure. Pulmonary homografts are the gold standard but their limited availability drives the need for alternatives. The aim of this study was to compare results of different RV conduits. MethodsBetween 1995 and 2023, 315 consecutive patients (mean age:37±12years, 73% male) underwent a Ross procedure using a homograft (n=211), bovine jugular vein (‘BJV’) (n=34) or xenograft (n=70) as RV conduit. Mean follow-up was 5.7±6.7years and was 96% complete (1631 patient-years). ResultsTwelve patients (homograft 8/211, BJV 3/34, xenograft 1/70) required RV conduit reintervention, four patients (homograft) within 4 years. Indications for reintervention were degeneration (n=8) and active endocarditis (n=4).Reinterventions included RV conduit replacement (n=6, homograft n=3, xenograft n=1, BJV n=2) and transcatheter valve implantation (n=6, homograft n=5, BJV n=1).At 15years, freedom from RV conduit reintervention was 88%; freedom from reoperation was 93%. Freedom from reintervention at 15years was similar between homografts (89%), BJV (89%), and xenografts (100%)(p=0.812). Progression of mean RV conduit gradient was lowest for the BJV (1.45mmHg/year) and similar between the homograft (2.6mmHg/year) and xenograft (2.9mmHg/year).Age at surgery (<18years; p<0.001; HR 1.9) was a predictive risk factor for reintervention. There was no difference between RV conduits (p=0.606; HR 1.198). ConclusionsThe incidence of reintervention after 15years is similar between homografts, xenograft, and BJV. Interestingly, homografts may fail in the first few years, possibly related to inflammatory phenomena. Thus, the use of xenografts may be an option if homografts are not available.

Initial balloon versus surgical valvuloplasty in children with isolated congenital aortic stenosis: Influence on timing of aortic valve replacement

ObjectiveTo evaluate the influence of initial intervention on the long-term outcomes in congenital aortic stenosis. MethodsTwo hundred forty-three children underwent initial intervention between 1997 and 2022, by surgical valvuloplasty in 92 (32% neonates, 36% infants) and balloon valvuloplasty in 151 (27% neonates, 30% infants). Twenty-eight patients (11.5%) had associated mitral valve stenosis. Competing risk analysis for death, alive after initial intervention, or alive after aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed and factors influencing survival or AVR examined. ResultsThere were 9 early deaths (3.7%). During a median follow-up of 13.5 years (range, 1.5-26.7), 98 patients had reintervention on the aortic valve (40.3%), whereas 145 had AVR (59.6%) at a median age of 14.0 years (interquartile range, 9.0-17.0), which was by Ross procedure in 130 (89.6%). Of the 12 late deaths, 3 were perioperative and 9 occurred as outpatients. There were no perioperative or late deaths after AVR. AVR occurred earlier in patients who had initial balloon (12.0 years [interquartile range, 5.0-14.5]) rather than surgical (18.5 years [interquartile range, 15.5-21.5]) valvuloplasty (P < .05). Actuarial survival in the cohort was 91.3% at 25 years, with no difference between the 2 initial interventions. Critical aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis, and initial intervention as a neonate were independent risk factors for worse survival. ConclusionsWe demonstrate excellent early and late survival in patients with congenital aortic stenosis after initial balloon or surgical valvuloplasty. Whilst children who had balloon valvuloplasty had AVR earlier than those who had initial surgical valvuloplasty, patient factors had a greater influence on survival than choice of initial intervention.

Computational analysis of heart valve growth and remodeling after the Ross procedure.

During the Ross procedure, an aortic heart valve is replaced by a patient's own pulmonary valve. The pulmonary autograft subsequently undergoes substantial growth and remodeling (G&R) due to its exposure to increased hemodynamic loads. In this study, we developed a homogenized constrained mixture model to understand the observed adaptation of the autograft leaflets in response to the changed hemodynamic environment. This model was based on the hypothesis that tissue G&R aims to preserve mechanical homeostasis for each tissue constituent. To model the Ross procedure, we simulated the exposure of a pulmonary valve to aortic pressure conditions and the subsequent G&R of the valve. Specifically, we investigated the effects of assuming either stress- or stretch-based mechanical homeostasis, the use of blood pressure control, and the effect of root dilation. With this model, we could explain different observations from published clinical studies, such as the increase in thickness, change in collagen organization, and change in tissue composition. In addition, we found that G&R based on stress-based homeostasis could better capture the observed changes in tissue composition than G&R based on stretch-based homeostasis, and that root dilation or blood pressure control can result in more leaflet elongation. Finally, our model demonstrated that successful adaptation can only occur when the mechanically induced tissue deposition is sufficiently larger than tissue degradation, such that leaflet thickening overrules leaflet dilation. In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that G&R based on mechanical homeostasis can capture the observed heart valve adaptation after the Ross procedure. Finally, this study presents a novel homogenized mixture model that can be used to investigate other cases of heart valve G&R as well.

The Ross Operation Over 55 Years Later: Comparing Surgical Techniques and Outcomes.

The Ross procedure is often considered the best option for a small group of patients. Some critics argue that harvesting the pulmonary artery again can cause problems, such as exposing the native pulmonary autograft to systemic pressures and requiring further intervention. However, the pulmonary autograft is a living tissue that can adjust to growing conditions and undergo remodelling. The pathophysiology of living tissue, harvesting techniques, indications for use of pulmonary autograft in aortic valve disease, contraindications, and variations of pulmonary autograft as an aortic conduit are discussed in this seminar. Following recent updates from high-volume centres, the indications, contraindications, techniques, and variations of pulmonary autograft as an aortic conduit and, in the absence of substantial well-designed randomised controlled trials, areas where the Ross procedure needs to be reaffirmed as part of the surgical armamentarium are also discussed. Furthermore, increasing evidence suggests that the Ross procedure produces better long-term results than traditional aortic valve replacement in young and middle-aged adults. To enable cardiologists and surgeons to make appropriate decisions for their patients with aortic valve disease, the author provides a complete review of the most recent published studies on the Ross procedure.

The Ross Procedure in Active Infective Endocarditis: A Comparison With Conventional Prostheses

BackgroundThe Ross procedure can be an ideal option in infective endocarditis (IE) due to greater resistance to infection. However, limited literature has highlighted the comparison with conventional prostheses in this setting. MethodsBetween February 2013 and September 2022, 25 patients (median age, 50 years) underwent a Ross procedure for IE (Ross group). The results were compared with those after other aortic valve procedures (aortic valve replacement and aortic root replacement) for IE (n = 37, other group. ResultsThe patients in the Ross group included more intravenous drug users and had more prosthetic valve endocarditis and annular abscess formation compared with the other group. Although cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time were significantly longer (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively) and the blood requirements were significantly higher (P = .001) in the Ross group, most postoperative short-term outcomes were equivalent between the 2 groups. During follow-up, 1 patient (4%) required reoperation in the Ross group, whereas 6 patients (16%) required reoperation in the other group. Freedom from composite events was significantly better in the Ross group (P = .04). Multivariable analysis found the Ross procedure, compared with other procedures, was a significant independent protective factor for composite end points (P = .03). ConclusionsFor IE, despite surgical complexity, the Ross procedure yielded short-term outcomes similar to other procedures. In the midterm, the Ross procedure provides a lower reoperation rate, resulting in significantly fewer composite events. The Ross procedure appears to be a better option for patients with IE, but long-term follow-up is necessary.

The landscape of congenital heart disease treated with the Ross procedure

BackgroundThe Ross procedure has excellent outcomes in the pediatric population. Some series have reported age- and anatomy-dependent outcomes, but a comprehensive analysis stratified by these variables has not been reported to date. We sought to describe the landscape of congenital heart disease (CHD) treated with the Ross procedure and identify the patients best served by this operation. MethodsOver a total of 30 years, 317 pediatric patients underwent the Ross procedure. These patients were stratified into 4 age groups—neonates (age <31 days; n = 21), infants (age 31 days to 1 year; n = 40), children (age 1-12 years; n = 165), and adolescents (age 13-18 years; n = 91)—and 3 anatomic groups—isolated aortic valve (AV) disease (n = 221), Shone complex or multilevel left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction (n = 61), and complex CHD (n = 35). The groups were compared across outcomes. ResultsNeonates and infants had the highest rates of Shone syndrome (P < .001), complex CHD (P < .001), concomitant root enlargement (P < .001), and arch procedures (P < .001). Operative mortality and morbidity were 4.4% (n = 14/317) and 14% (n = 44/317), respectively. Both were higher in neonates and infants (P < .001 for both) but lower for patients with isolated AV disease (P < .001 for both). Ten-year survival and freedom from LVOT reintervention were 92% and 81%, respectively, and were significantly better in patients with isolated AV disease compared to those with complex CHD (P < .001 and P = .005, respectively). In neonates and infants with isolated AV disease, operative mortality was 4% (n = 1/23), morbidity was 9% (n = 2/23), 10-year survival was 85.6%, and 10-year freedom from LVOT reintervention was 88.4%. ConclusionsAmong pediatric patients, those with isolated AV disease are best served with the Ross procedure, regardless of age. Complex CHD is associated with lower survival and increased risk of LVOT reintervention.

The early and medium-term results of the Ross procedure in pediatric patients

Introduction and objectivesThe Ross method is the preferred surgical treatment for pediatric aortic valve diseases, and its long-term outcomes have been extensively documented. This article presents the results of the Ross and Ross–Konno procedures performed on pediatric patients in our center. MethodsRoss and Ross–Konno procedures were performed on 20 patients in our center between January 2015 and January 2019. ResultsThe patients’ mean age was 10.6 years (range: 23 days to 18 years) and mean weight was 37.6 kg (range: 3–63 kg). Thirteen had aortic valve stenosis, four had aortic valve insufficiency, and three had a mixed disease. The Ross–Konno procedure was used for four patients. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 184.68±60.1 min and the mean cross time was 149±67.8 min. One neonatal patient died in the early postoperative phase due to low cardiac output. The mean follow-up time was 60.15±24.45 months. One patient later underwent reoperation due to conduit stenosis. One patient is being monitored for moderately serious conduit stenosis. At present, of those who underwent the procedure, one has moderate aortic regurgitation, two have mild or moderate aortic regurgitation, and others have minimal aortic regurgitation. No patients required intervention for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and mortality was not observed in the long term. Conclusion(s)The reintervention rates for autograft and conduit-related cases were low in early and medium-term follow-up, and no significant autograft insufficiency was observed. Ross or Ross–Konno surgery is preferred for aortic diseases in pediatric patients due to its low mortality and satisfactory long-term results.

Ross Confers More Favorable Left Ventricular Remodeling Compared With Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background: Aortic valve disease results in left ventricular (LV) dilation and/or hypertrophy. Valve intervention may improve, but not normalize flow dynamics. We hypothesized that LV remodeling would be more favorable following the Ross procedure versus mechanical aortic valve replacement (mAVR). Methods: Patients who were 18 to 50 years of age and underwent Ross or mAVR from 2000 to 2016 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed and yielded 27 well-matched pairs. Demographics and echocardiographic variables of LV morphology and wall thickness were collected. Those with > mild residual valve disease were excluded. Primary endpoints included LV morphology. T test and Fisher exact test analysis were used for statistical comparison. Results: Average age at operation (Ross 35.3 ± 10.2 vs mAVR 37.3 ± 8.9 years) did not differ. Indication for operation was similar between groups. Preoperative echocardiographic variables did not differ. At average follow-up duration (Ross 7.9 ± 2.4 vs mAVR 7.3 ± 2.4 years), wall thickness was significantly smaller for Ross compared with mAVR (P = .00715). Only 4/27 (15%) of mAVR patients had normalized LV parameters compared with 16/27 (59%) of Ross patients (P = .000813). Residual hypertrophy was the most common long-term abnormality for mAVR. Conclusion: Following aortic valve replacement with the Ross procedure or mechanical aortic valve prosthesis, the Ross conferred more favorable LV remodeling compared with mAVR. Future directions include analyzing longer follow-up to determine if patterns persist and the impact on cardiac morbidity and mortality.

Commentator Discussion: Long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure in neonates and infants: A multi-institutional analysis

Commentator Discussion: Long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure in neonates and infants: A multi-institutional analysis

Machine Learning and Statistical Shape Modelling Methodologies to Assess Vascular Morphology before and after Aortic Valve Replacement.

Introduction: Statistical shape modelling (SSM) is used to analyse morphology, discover qualitatively and quantitatively unique shape features within a population, and generate mean shapes and shape modes that show morphological variability. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering is a machine learning analysis used to identify subgroups within a given population in relation to shape features. We tested the application of both methods in the clinically relevant scenario of patients undergoing aortic valve repair (AVR). Every year, around 5000 patients undergo surgical AVR in the UK. Aims: Evaluate aortic morphology and identify subgroups amongst patients who had undergone AVR, including Ozaki, Ross, and valve-sparing procedures using SSM and unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis. This methodological framework can evaluate both pre- and post-surgical variability across subgroups undergoing different surgeries. Methods: Pre- (n = 47) and post- (n = 35) operative three-dimensional (3D) aortic models were reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images. Computational analyses for SSM and hierarchical clustering were run separately for the two subgroups, assessing (a) ascending aorta only and (b) the whole aorta. This allows for exploring possible variations in morphological classification related to the input shape. Results: Most patients in the Ross procedure subgroup exhibited differences in aortic morphology from other subgroups, including an elongated ascending and wide aortic arch pre-operatively, and an elongated ascending aorta with a slightly enlarged sinus post-operatively. In hierarchical clustering, the Ross aortas also appeared to cluster together compared to the other surgical procedures, both pre-operatively and post-operatively. There were significant differences between clusters in terms of clustering distance in the pre-operative analyses (p = 0.003 for ascending aortas, p = 0.016 for whole aortas). There were no significant differences between the clusters in post-operative analyses (p = 0.47 for ascending, p = 0.19 for whole aorta). Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of evaluating aortic morphology before and after different aortic valve surgeries using SSM and hierarchical clustering. This framework could be used to further explore shape features associated with surgical decision-making pre-operatively and, importantly, to identify subgroups whose morphology is associated with poorer clinical outcomes post-operatively. Statistical shape modelling (SSM) and unsupervised hierarchical clustering are two statistical methods that can be used to assess morphology, show morphological variations, with the latter being able to identify subgroups within a population. These methods have been applied to the population of aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients since there are different surgical procedures (traditional AVR, Ozaki, Ross, and valve-sparing). The aim is to evaluate aortic morphology and identify subgroups within this population before and after surgery. Computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance images were reconstructed into 3D models of the ascending aorta and whole aorta, which were then input into SSM and hierarchical clustering. The results show that the Ross aortic morphology is quite different from the other aortas. The clustering did not classify the aortas based on the surgical procedures; however, most of the Ross group did cluster together, indicating low variability within this surgical group.

Ozaki technique versus ross operation for complex aortic valve diseases in children: A retrospective cohort study.

The Ozaki technique demonstrated promising results in adults, but few studies reported on pediatric patients with limited follow-up time. This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term results of Ozaki technique compared with Ross operation for complex aortic valve (AV) diseases in children. One hundred and seventeen children underwent either Ozaki (n = 64) or Ross (n = 53) operation from January 2017 to December 2023. The primary endpoint was incidence of moderate or severe regurgitation/stenosis (AR/AS) post procedure. No significant difference was observed in age (6.5±3.4 vs. 7.9±4.3 years) and weight (25.9±15.5 vs. 31.0±25.9kgs) at surgery. The Ozaki group had significantly more patients in heart failure (20.3% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.003) before surgery and more patients needed ECMO installation (6.3% vs. 0, P = 0.125) after surgery. The Ozaki group were in worse status with more patients occurred heart failure (20.3% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.003) before surgery and needed ECMO installation (6.3% vs. 0, P = 0.125) after surgery. During follow up (20.4±17.3 vs. 22.7±22.8 months, P = 0.526), five patients (7.8%) in Ozaki group but no patients in Ross group required reoperations. The incidence of moderate or severe AR (28.1% vs. 3.1%) and AS (31.3% vs. 5.7%) were significantly higher than Ross group. Multivariate analysis identified lower age [HR:1.282 (95%CI:1.075-1.529), P = 0.006] and ECMO installation [HR:0.126 (0.018-0.887), P = 0.037] to be risk factors for moderate or severe AR, and higher aortic transvalvular gradient before discharge was confirmed as the only risk factor for moderate or severe AS (≥36mmHg) at follow up in Ozaki group. Ozaki technique may be used as a palliative procedure for complex AV diseases in children, but its' mid-term results were not durable as Ross surgery, especially younger patients.

Novel Techniques and Technologies for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Large Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Background/Objectives: In an era of growing evidence for transaortic valve implantation (TAVI), our research topic was the evaluation of how surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVRs) are performing in terms of short- and long-term outcomes in different risk categories. Methods: This was a single centre, prospective, and observational cohort study of consecutive patients with aortic valve stenosis, undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement using a biological or mechanical prosthesis, Freestyle™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) graft, homograft, or Ross procedure. The participant data were collected by review of an internal database. The primary endpoints were all-cause operative mortality (in hospital and at 30 days) and late mortality at the follow-up date. The secondary composite endpoint was the incidence of postoperative complications. Results: 1501 patients underwent SAVR; the mean age was 67 years (SD: 12.6). The in-hospital mortality was 1% (n = 16). At a median follow-up of 60 months, the survival rate was 98.7%. The main predictors for mortality were operative urgency and cardiogenic shock. The overall incidence of PPM was 2.3% (n = 34). Patients who underwent Ross procedure were younger (mean age: 20 years (SD: 1.7)), had a lower incidence of postoperative complications, and were all alive at follow-up. Conclusions: SAVR shows an excellent survival rate and a low rate of postoperative complications despite an increasing surgical risk. Recent advancements in technology, like sutureless/rapid deployment prostheses and minimally invasive techniques, are shown to have favourable effects on outcomes.

Long-Term Results of Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in Children With Aortic Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience.

Congenital aortic stenosis is a common pathology in the childhood age group and its clinical spectrum varies between asymptomatic and severe heart failure. In our study, we planned to evaluate the long-term results of patients who underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) due to critical aortic valve stenosis in our clinic. Patients aged 0-18 years who underwent aortic balloon valvuloplasty due to aortic stenosis in our clinic between January 2002 and January 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Among the 48 patients who underwent balloon valvuloplasty due to aortic stenosis, 13 (27%) were female, and 35 (73%) were male. The median age at the time of the procedure was 27.5 months (IQR: 4-96), the median weight was 9.9 kg (IQR: 5.40-29.50), and the median height was 79 cm (IQR: 54-133). The median follow-up duration was 93.5 months (IQR: 38-132). Angiographic assessments in all patients revealed a median left ventricular pressure of 160 mmHg (IQR: 140-200) and a median pressure gradient between the left ventricle and the aorta of 60 mmHg (IQR: 42-80). The median balloon diameter used was 10 mm (IQR: 8-12). Post-procedural measurements showed a median mean gradient of 30 mmHg (IQR: 20-35) between the left ventricle and the aorta. The procedure was successful in 45 (93.5%) patients. During follow-up, 11 patients required surgical intervention. Ross procedure was performed in five patients, homograft in five patients, and mechanical valve implantation in one patient. Risk factors for the need for surgical intervention were evaluated in detail. During the follow-up, the risk factor for intervention was determined to be aortic insufficiency. Aortic valve balloon valvuloplasty is a safe and successful treatment method for critical aortic stenosis. It should be the first choice of treatment option in suitable patients.

A novel, simplified protected Ross technique: The “Seattle shawl” procedure

ObjectiveAutograft dilation and subsequent aortic regurgitation remain a challenge in the long term after the Ross procedure in adults. We have developed a novel technique for a modified Dacron wrap of the pulmonary autograft to help stabilize and mitigate this issue. MethodsIn 2022, we formalized a patient-specific tailored algorithm for autograft protection during the Ross procedure, including use of a modified Dacron wrap (“Seattle shawl”). This technique involves the use of a Valsalva graft, which is “keyholed” to facilitate coronary button implantation on the autograft and then wrapped around the pulmonary autograft. A total of 6 patients have undergone the Seattle shawl procedure. Mean follow-up time was 11.8 months (range, 4-17 months). ResultsAll 6 patients had bicuspid aortic valves with severe aortic regurgitation. Mean aortic annulus size was 30.3 mm, and mean aortic root diameter was 4.4 cm. There were no perioperative strokes, reinterventions, or mortalities. All patients had mild or less aortic regurgitation on the most recent echocardiogram. Aortic root diameters were between 3.2 and 3.9 cm on the most recent imaging examination. There were no mortalities or complications observed during the follow-up period. ConclusionsPulmonary autograft dilation remains a challenge postoperatively after the Ross procedure in adults. Multiple interventions have been used to minimize this phenomenon. These include technical modifications such as annuloplasty rings or complete inclusion of the autograft within a Dacron graft. We present a novel, straightforward technique for autograft protection using a modified Valsalva graft. Early outcomes in 6 patients appear promising with this technique.