ROS1 Inhibitor Research Articles

Discovery of Oral Degraders of the ROS1 Fusion Protein with Potent Activity against Secondary Resistance Mutations.

The development of therapeutic resistance in the majority of patients limits the long-term benefit of ROS1 inhibitor treatment. On-target mutations of the ROS1 kinase domain confer resistance to crizotinib and lorlatinib in more than one-third of acquired resistance cases with no current effective treatment option. As an alternative to stoichiometric inhibition, proteolytic degradation of ROS1 could provide an effective tool to combat resistance generated by these mutations. Our study has identified a potent, orally active ROS1 degrader with an excellent pharmacokinetics profile. The degrader can effectively inhibit ROS1-dependent cell proliferation and tumor growth by degrading the ROS1 kinase, thereby eliminating the active phospho-ROS1. More importantly, the degradation-based therapeutic modality can overcome on-target mutation resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors by efficient degradation of the mutated kinase to achieve greater potency than inhibition.

Repotrectinib: Redefining the therapeutic landscape for patients with ROS1 fusion-driven non-small cell lung cancer.

The ROS1 proto-oncogene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase with structural homology to other oncogenic drivers, including ALK and TRKA-B-C. The FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) crizotinib and entrectinib have demonstrated efficacy in treating ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC. However, limitations such as poor blood-brain barrier penetration and acquired resistance, particularly the ROS1 G2032R solvent-front mutation, hinder treatment durability. Repotrectinib, a next-generation macrocyclic TKI, was rationally designed to overcome on-target resistance mutations and improve brain distribution through its low molecular weight. In the TRIDENT-1 clinical trial, repotrectinib demonstrated significant efficacy in both TKI-naïve and TKI-pretreated patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC, including those with CNS metastases and G2032R resistance mutations. In the TKI-naïve cohort (n = 71), 79% of patients achieved an objective response, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 35.7 months, surpassing all previously approved ROS1 TKIs. In patients who had received one prior ROS1 TKI but were chemotherapy-naïve (n = 56), objective responses were observed in 38%, and median PFS was 9.0 months. The safety profile of repotrectinib was consistent with earlier-generation ROS1 TKIs and common adverse events included anemia, neurotoxicity, increased creatine kinase levels, and weight gain. These findings underscore the potential of repotrectinib to address unmet needs in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC, offering durable responses and improved intracranial activity. Future research should prioritize developing next-generation, selective ROS1 inhibitors to reduce Trk-mediated toxicities and improve treatment tolerance.

Population modeling analyses of crizotinib in pediatric patients with ALK-positive advanced cancers.

Alterations in the ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) gene play a critical role in pathogenesis of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Crizotinib is a small molecule competitive inhibitor of ALK, ROS1, and MET kinases and was approved for pediatric patients with ALK-positive relapsed or refractory, systemic ALCL, and ALK-positive unresectable, recurrent, or refractory inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMT). Crizotinib data from pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, IMT, or ALCL were included in the analyses. All patients received crizotinib orally at doses ranging from 100 to 365mg/m2 twice daily (BID). PopPK analyses were conducted to characterize crizotinib disposition in pediatric patients. Exposure-response (ER) safety and antitumor analyses were conducted to characterize relationships between crizotinib dose or exposure with safety and antitumor activity endpoints of interest. The population pharmacokinetic (popPK), ER safety, and ER antitumor analysis included 98, 110, and 36 pediatric patients, respectively. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with allometric scaling, first-order elimination, and first-order absorption with lag time adequately described the data. Natural log-transformed model-predicted crizotinib AUCss (steady-state area under the concentration-time curve) demonstrated a significant, positive relationship with Grade ≥3 NEUTROPENIA and Any Grade VISION DISORDER. Crizotinib dose demonstrated a positive relationship with objective response rate. No significant differences in PK were identified across a wide range of ages or across tumor types, suggesting body surface area (BSA)-based dosing adequately adjusted for differences in patient size to achieve similar systemic crizotinib exposures across young children and adolescent pediatric patients. None of the myelosuppressive events except Grade ≥3 NEUTROPENIA had significant relationships identified with crizotinib dose or exposure, suggesting crizotinib is a tolerable treatment with less hematological toxicity than traditional chemotherapy regimens for pediatric patients with ALK-mutated cancers. Results from the presented analyses support the pediatric dosing recommendations in the product label.

Identification of Key Genes and Signaling Pathways in Entrectinibresistant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Using Bioinformatic Analysis and Experimental Verification.

Entrectinib, a ROS1 inhibitor, is effective in patients with ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, entrectinib resistance remains a challenge worldwide. The biomarkers of entrectinib resistance and molecular mechanisms have not been clarified based on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The aim of this study is to identify key genes and signaling pathways involved in the development of entrectinib-resistant NSCLC through bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened between entrectinib resistant and parental human NSCLC cell lines of the GSE214715 dataset, lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and non-tumor adjacent tissues of the GSE75037 dataset, and NSCLC and non-tumor adjacent tissues of the GSE18842 dataset. Functional enrichment analyses were performed, including Gene Ontology (GO) term and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. Overlapped DEGs among those three datasets were identified using the Venn diagram package. The transcriptional levels of key genes were investigated using the University of ALabama at Birmingham CANcer data analysis Portal (UALCAN). The association between transcriptional levels of key genes and survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Plotter (https://www.kmplot.com/analysis/). The correlations between hub genes and immune cell infiltration were investigated using the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) database. Specific signaling pathway enrichment analysis was performed using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of LinkedOmics. Competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) networks, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and drug sensitivity analyses of key genes were further investigated. The expression of ZEB2 was subsequently confirmed in both parental HCC78 cells and entrectinib-resistant HCC78 cells using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). 708 DEGs were identified between entrectinib-resistant CUTO28 (CUTO28-ER) and parental CUTO28 cell lines in the GSE214715 dataset. One thousand three hundred and ninety-five DEGs were identified between entrectinib resistant (CUTO37-ER) and parental CUTO37 cell lines in the GSE214715 dataset. Eight hundred and forty-nine DEGs were identified between LUAD and non-tumor adjacent tissues in the GSE75037 dataset. Seven hundred and sevety-three DEGs were identified between NSCLC and non-tumor adjacent tissues in the GSE18842 dataset. Among these three datasets, seven overlapped DEGs were identified, including ZBED2, CHI3L2, CELF2, SEMA5A, ZEB2, S100A12, and PDK4. Among these seven overlapped DEGs, the expression levels of CHI3L2, ZEB2, and S100A12 were downregulated in those three datasets. The results of analysis using the UALCAN database showed that these three genes were significantly downregulated in LUAD and LUSC patients compared with the normal population. However, only the lower transcriptional level of ZEB2 was linked to worse survival in patients with lung cancer. GSEA analysis revealed that ZEB2 was significantly negatively correlated with nucleotide excision repair (NER) in LUAD, and homologous recombination (HR) and NER in LUSC, which were linked to drug resistance. A ceRNA network of THRB-AS1/ has-miR-1293/ ZEB2 in LUAD was established. We have identified core genes associated with non-small cell resistance to entrectinib, including CHI3L2, ZEB2, and S100A12. ZEB2 is a core gene associated with acquired resistance to entetinib in NSCLC.

AB055. Infantile high-grade glioma (IHG)-a case series of Hong Kong experience.

Infantile high-grade glioma (IHG) is diagnosed in patients less than 12 months of age. Studies have shown that it displays a more stable genome and is usually single mutation-driven. The most identifiable mutations are receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) fusion, such as neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) family, reactive oxygen species (ROS1), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) factor. The current principal treatment remains to be surgery, but it is challenging for a complete resection due to hemispheric involvement. Use of chemotherapeutic drugs for IHG is still under debate, with targeted therapy showing efficacy in promoting tumor shrinkage. Despite being a challenging central nervous system (CNS) tumor, the overall survival of IHG is superior to other high-grade gliomas. This is a retrospective review of local IHG patients and their outcome. Up till the end of 2022, we identified eight IHG patients in our local data. Mean age of diagnosis was 3 months. There were four males and four females. Seven patients had histological diagnosis of glioblastoma and one patient had a diagnosis of anaplastic astrocytoma. One patient had her tumor located in the infratentorial region. Four patients had multilobar involvement. NTRK fusion was found in four patients (ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and TPR-NTRK1 fusion). ALK fusion was found in one patient (HMBOX1-ALK). ROS1 fusion was found in one patient (ZCCHZ8-ROS1). All patients underwent chemotherapy, with four patients switched to NTRK inhibitors and one patient to ROS1 inhibitors afterward. Surgery was performed at various time points for these patients. Two patients passed away, at 22 and 35 months of age at submission of this abstract. Infantile high-grade glioma should be regarded as a unique tumor entity and a multidisciplinary approach is paramount in improving survival for this group of patients.

Foritinib in advanced ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer in China: a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study

Currently approved targeted treatment for ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has either inadequate intracranial activity or CNS-related toxicities. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of foritinib, a novel ALK and ROS1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. This two-part (phase 2a and 2b), multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study was done in 29 centres in China. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed ROS1-rearranged, locally advanced or metastatic stage IIIB-IV NSCLC, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less. Patients who had previously received no or one ROS1 inhibitor were enrolled into phase 2a, and patients who were naive to ROS1 inhibitor therapy were enrolled into phase 2b cohort 1. Participants in phase 2a received 80, 120, 160, or 210 mg foritinib succinate (foritinib) orally once daily over 21-day cycles; patients in phase 2b received the recommended phase 2 dose of 160 mg. The primary endpoint was objective response rate, assessed by the independent review committee in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment). The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and had available safety assessments. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04237805. Between March 26, 2020, and Dec 29, 2022, 104 patients were enrolled and treated. Six patients who had previously received more than one ROS1 inhibitor were enrolled in phase 2a before a protocol amendment stating that patients in this phase should have received no more than one ROS1 inhibitor; these patients were included in the safety analysis but excluded from the efficacy analysis of the ROS1-inhibitor-pretreated cohort. Therefore, the efficacy analysis set (n=98) included 42 patients from phase 2a (17 who were ROS1 inhibitor naive and 25 who had previously received ROS1 inhibitor) and 56 patients from phase 2b cohort 1. In phase 2a, the objective response rate was 94% (95% CI 71-100; 16 of 17 patients) in patients who were ROS1 inhibitor naive and 40% (21-61; ten of 25) in patients who had previously received ROS1 inhibitor. In phase 2b cohort 1, the objective response rate was 88% (95% CI 76-95; 49 of 56 patients). In a prespecified exploratory analysis in 41 patients with CNS metastases at baseline, the objective response rate was 100% (95% CI 48-100; five of five patients) in patients in phase 2a who were ROS1 inhibitor naive, 40% (16-68; six of 15) in patients in phase 2a who had previously received ROS1 inhibitor, and 90% (70-99; 19 of 21) in patients in phase 2b cohort 1. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33 (32%) of 104 patients; the most common were hyperglycaemia (12 [12%] patients) and electrocardiogram prolonged QT interval (six [6%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 (11%) patients, with hyperglycaemia (six [6%]) being most common. No treatment-related adverse events led to death. Foritinib showed systemic and intracranial antitumour activity and good tolerability in ROS1-inhibitor-naive patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. Foritinib represents a promising treatment for these patients, especially in those with CNS metastases. Fosun Pharma, Wanbang Biopharmaceuticals, and Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer.

Bone-metastatic lung adenocarcinoma cells bearing CD74-ROS1 fusion interact with macrophages to promote their dissemination.

Approximately 40% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) often develop bone metastases during the course of their disease. However, scarcely any in vivo model of LUAD bone metastasis has been established, leading to a poor understanding of the mechanisms underlying LUAD bone metastasis. Here, we established a multiorgan metastasis model via the left ventricular injection of luciferase-labeled LUAD cells into nude mice and then screened out lung metastasis (LuM) and bone metastasis (BoM) cell subpopulations. BoM cells exhibited greater stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plasticity than LuM cells and initially colonized the bone and subsequently disseminated to distant organs after being reinjected into mice. Moreover, a CD74-ROS1 fusion mutation (C6; R34) was detected in BoM cells but not in LuM cells. Mechanistically, BoM cells bearing the CD74-ROS1 fusion highly secrete the C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) protein by activating STAT3 signaling, recruiting macrophages in tumor microenvironment and strongly inducing M2 polarization of macrophages. BoM cell-activated macrophages produce a high level of TGF-β1, thereby facilitating EMT and invasion of LUAD cells via TGF-β/SMAD2/3 signaling. Targeting the CD74-ROS1/CCL5 axis with Crizotinib (a ROS1 inhibitor) and Maraviroc (a CCL5 receptor inhibitor) in vivo strongly impeded bone metastasis and secondary metastasis of BoM cells. Our findings reveal the critical role of the CD74-ROS1/STAT3/CCL5 axis in the interaction between LUAD bone metastasis cells and macrophages for controlling LUAD cell dissemination, highlighting the significance of the bone microenvironment in LUAD bone metastasis and multiorgan secondary metastasis, and suggesting that targeting CD74-ROS1 and CCL5 is a promising therapeutic strategy for LUAD bone metastasis.

Efficacy and safety of entrectinib in children with extracranial solid or primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors harboring NTRK or ROS1 fusions.

10000 Background: Entrectinib previously yielded durable responses in children with NTRKor ROS1fusion-positive extracranial solid or primary CNS tumors in STARTRK-NG (NCT02650401). We present updated data from STARTRK-NG, TAPISTRY (NCT04589845) and STARTRK-2 (NCT02568267): pediatric patients from these trials were combined to enable an integrated efficacy and safety analysis on a larger cohort than previously. Methods: Eligible patients were TRK or ROS1 inhibitor naïve and aged < 18 years, had locally advanced or metastatic extracranial solid or primary CNS tumors harboring an NTRK or ROS1 fusion, and had measurable or evaluable-only disease. Once enrolled, patients received ≥1 daily dose of oral entrectinib until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Tumor responses were confirmed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1 or RANO criteria. Patients were included if they had been followed for ≥6 months. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per BICR. Key secondary endpoints included ORR in patients with baseline measurable disease per BICR, duration of confirmed response (DoR), time to confirmed response (TTR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: At clinical cutoff (16 July 2023), out of 91 safety-evaluable patients (regardless of fusion), 44 patients in the NTRKcohort and 20 patients in the ROS1cohort were efficacy evaluable. Median duration of survival follow-up was 24.2 months ( NTRK: range 1–66) and 27.6 months ( ROS1: range 1–73). The ORR was 68.2% (95% CI 52.4–81.4) in the NTRK cohort and 65.0% (95% CI 40.8–84.6) in the ROS1 cohort. In patients with baseline measurable disease, the ORR was 77.8% ( NTRK: n = 28/36; 95% CI 60.9–89.9) and 62.5% ( ROS1: n = 10/16; 95% CI 35.4–84.8). Efficacy outcomes are shown in the Table. The most common adverse events were pyrexia (50.5%), vomiting (40.7%) and anemia (40.7%). Conclusions: Entrectinib continued to yield rapid and durable responses in pediatric patients with extracranial solid or primary CNS tumors harboring an NTRK or ROS1 fusion. The safety profile of entrectinib was in line with previous reports. Clinical trial information: NCT02650401 / NCT04589845 / NCT02568267 . [Table: see text]

Abstract LB182: Mutagenesis screens support potential best-in-class profile for selective, brain-penetrant, and TRK-sparing ROS1 inhibitor NVL-520

Abstract Introduction. ROS1 fusions are recurrent oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) crizotinib, entrectinib, and repotrectinib have been approved for the treatment of ROS1-positive NSCLC. Response to these TKIs can be limited by emergence of drug resistance, with ~40% of patients acquiring on-target ROS1 mutations at progression on crizotinib. NVL-520 is an investigational, brain-penetrant, and TRK-sparing ROS1 TKI designed to maintain activity for ROS1 mutations that confer resistance to approved therapies. To investigate suppression of resistance by NVL-520, we performed two N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis screens and determined the frequency and identity of resistance mutations following treatment with NVL-520 versus earlier-generation ROS1 TKIs. Methods. Cells were treated with ENU for 1 day followed by crizotinib, entrectinib, repotrectinib, or NVL-520 for 28 days. Frequency of resistance indicates the fraction of wells that proliferated on day 28 despite continuous TKI treatment. Resistance mutations in the ROS1 kinase domain were identified by Sanger sequencing. Resistant clones harboring ROS1 kinase-domain mutations were expanded and used to profile the inhibitory activity of ROS1 TKIs. Results. The first ENU screen was performed on Ba/F3 CD74-ROS1, simulating a first-line treatment setting. NVL-520 at an unbound drug concentration (Cunbound) of 8.2 nM yielded 1 resistant clone among 480 replicate wells (frequency of resistance = 0.2%). The second screen was performed on Ba/F3 CD74-ROS1 G2032R, which is the most common point mutation after progression on previous-generation therapies, simulating a later-line treatment setting. NVL-520 at Cunbound of 41 nM yielded 6 resistant clones among 480 replicate wells (frequency of resistance = 1.3%). These NVL-520 concentrations (8.2 - 41 nM) were well within its average Cunbound of 166 nM at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 100 mg once daily. None of the 7 resistant clones harbored ROS1 kinase-domain mutations, suggesting an off-target resistance mechanism. Crizotinib, entrectinib, and repotrectinib at their respective average human Cunbound yielded frequencies of resistance ranging from >33% to 100% in at least one of the screens, indicating that they were less effective than NVL-520 at suppressing resistance in these screens. Conclusion. NVL-520 was highly effective at suppressing resistance in ENU mutagenesis screens simulating first-line (CD74-ROS1) and later-line (CD74-ROS1 G2032R) treatment. The screens did not reveal any novel ROS1 mutations that could confer resistance to NVL-520 at the RP2D. The broad preclinical activity against ROS1 and diverse ROS1 mutations, together with its brain penetrance and TRK-sparing design, suggests NVL-520 as a potential best-in-class ROS1 therapy. Citation Format: Anupong Tangpeerachaikul, Franklin Gu, Henry E. Pelish. Mutagenesis screens support potential best-in-class profile for selective, brain-penetrant, and TRK-sparing ROS1 inhibitor NVL-520 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB182.

Current treatment and novel insights regarding ROS1-targeted therapy in malignant tumors.

The proto-oncogene ROS1 encodes an intrinsic type I membrane protein of the tyrosine kinase/insulin receptor family. ROS1 facilitates the progression of various malignancies via self-mutations or rearrangements. Studies on ROS1-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been conducted, and some have been approved by the FDA for clinical use. However, the adverse effects and mechanisms of resistance associated with ROS1 inhibitors remain unknown. In addition, next-generation ROS1 inhibitors, which have the advantage of treating central nervous system metastases and alleviating endogenous drug resistance, are still in the clinical trial stage. In this study, we searched relevant articles reporting the mechanism and clinical application of ROS1 in recent years; systematically reviewed the biological mechanisms, diagnostic methods, and research progress on ROS1 inhibitors; and provided perspectives for the future of ROS1-targeted therapy. ROS1 is most expressed in malignant tumours. Only a few ROS1 kinase inhibitors are currently approved for use in NSCLC, the efficacy of other TKIs for NSCLC and other malignancies has not been ascertained. There is no effective standard treatment for adverse events or resistance to ROS1-targeted therapy. Next-generation TKIs appear capable of overcoming resistance and delaying central nervous system metastasis, but with a greater incidence of adverse effects. Further research on next-generation TKIs regarding the localization of ROS1 and its fusion partners, binding sites for targeted drugs, and coadministration with other drugs is required. The correlation between TKIs and chemotherapy or immunotherapy in clinical practice requires further study.

Abstract 2857: Perspectives from a systematic review of kinase fusion oncogenes and access to corresponding kinase inhibitor clinical trials in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult solid malignancies

Abstract Oncogenic kinase fusions (KFs) have been reported in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (P-AYA) brain tumors, sarcomas, and rare solid malignancies. Molecularly targeted therapy (MTT) matched to KFs generally produce objective responses even in advanced P-AYA malignancies. KFs occur across a broad age range of P-AYA cancer diagnoses (dx) so data on KF prevalence and the relationship between KFs and clinical characteristics including response and resistance to MTT is distributed across many studies. To address resulting knowledge gaps, we conducted a systematic review of KFs reported in P-AYA cancers and assessed the availability of clinical trials (CTs) for P-AYA patients with KF malignancies. A systematic literature search was conducted with PubMed using publication date 2013-2022, search terms for dx, age, and gene names of interest (BRAF, RAF1, NTRK1-3, ALK, FGFR1-4, MET, RET, ROS1). Known P-AYA cancer sequencing studies were also reviewed. Papers were included if they reported ≥1 patient <18 yo with a KF cancer of any type or ≤30 yo with a KF P-AYA cancer dx. Data abstracted included paper type, KF gene and partner, dx, fusion breakpoints, age, stage, MTT received, response to MTT, and CT enrollment. Clinicaltrials.gov was queried for interventional CTs in the U.S. assessing relevant MTTs. We identified 531 studies (299 case reports/series; 119 P-AYA sequencing studies) reporting 4,329 patients with a KF P-AYA solid tumor. Brain tumors had, in decreasing order of frequency, BRAF, NTRK, FGFR, ALK, ROS1, RAF1, MET, and RET fusions. Dx in which KFs were reported were LGG (n=2451), HGG (n=298), embryonal tumors (n=16), ependymomas (n=8), meningioma (n=1), and other (n=16). Extracranial solid tumors (EST) had, in decreasing order of frequency, NTRK, RET, ALK, BRAF, ROS1, MET, FGFR, and RAF1 fusions. Dx in which KFs were reported were thyroid cancer (n=607), sarcoma (n=546), melanoma and spitz tumor (n=183), renal tumor (n=90), carcinoma (n=57), rhabdomyosarcoma (n=12), neuroblastoma (n=11), osteosarcoma (n=9), and other (n=24). As of Aug 23, 2023, 476 CTs were assessing 65 inhibitors relevant for these KFs, of which only 20 are currently FDA-approved. Patients <18 yo were only eligible for 16% of CTs. RET (47%), RAF/BRAF (33%), and NTRK (32%) inhibitors had the highest percent of CTs enrolling patients <18 yo while ERK (4%) and FGFR (6%) inhibitors had the least. Notably, while 467 P-AYA patients identified in our review were <18 yo and had an ALK- or ROS1-fusion positive tumor, only 24% of ALK or ROS1 inhibitor CTs allowed enrollment of patients <18 yo. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of KFs in P-AYA solid tumors. Oncogenic KFs are common and occur across P-AYA solid and brain tumor dx demonstrating a need for CTs of relevant MTTs including patients <18 yo, particularly for drugs targeting ALK, ROS1, and FGFR. Citation Format: Lorena Lazo de la Vega, Sebastian K. Eder, Ellen Sukharevsky, Zachary A. Kahn, Michaela O'Connell, Franziska Wachter, Emily P. Anderson, Maria C. Trissal, Jenna J. LaBelle, Kendall Carpenter, Leo Kager, Mariella G. Filbin, Katherine A. Janeway. Perspectives from a systematic review of kinase fusion oncogenes and access to corresponding kinase inhibitor clinical trials in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult solid malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2857.

ROS1 Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient with Brain Metastases Who Overcame Crizotinib Resistance with Lorlatinib: Case Report

Background: ROS1-positive patients account for 1-2% of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Crizotinib is the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated in first line treatment of ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. However, crizotinib resistance is frequent within the first 12 months of treatment. Lorlatinib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor of ROS-1 recently indicated for metastatic or locally advanced crizotinib-resistant NSCLC. Case report: We report a case of a 43-year-old female patient with no medical history, diagnosted with stage IVB NSCLC including asymptomatic brain metastasis, and harboring ROS1 rearrangement. Within the first three months of starting crizotinib, the patient showed on CT scan evaluation new bone and brain metastases. Lorlatinib in the second line revealed a noteworthy improvement in metastasis and primary lesion. Conclusion: Brain metastases frequently occur in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC at the time of diagnosis and treatment course. However the efficacy of crizotinib might not translate to intracranial control of the disease, one of the cause of resistance to this drug.

Repotrectinib: First Approval.

Repotrectinib (AUGTYRO™) is a next-generation, oral, small-molecule kinase inhibitor of proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS1 (ROS1) and tropomyosin receptor tyrosine kinases (TRKs) TRKA, TRKB, and TRKC. It is being developed by Turning Point Therapeutics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Repotrectinib is a next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor rationally designed to inhibit ROS1 and TRK fusion, including in the presence of resistance mutations such as solvent-front mutations. In November 2023, repotrectinib received its first approval in the USA for the treatment of adults with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1-positive NSCLC. Repotrectinib is under regulatory review in China and the EU for NSCLC. Clinical studies of repotrectinib are ongoing in several countries in patients with NSCLC and other solid tumours (including primary central nervous system cancer) across both adult and paediatric patient populations. In addition, preclinical investigation of repotrectinib in multiple myeloma is underway in the USA. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of repotrectinib leading to this first approval for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic ROS1-positive NSCLC.

Structural Aspects of the ROS1 Kinase Domain and Oncogenic Mutations

Protein kinases function as pivotal regulators in biological events, governing essential cellular processes through the transfer of phosphate groups from ATP molecules to substrates. Dysregulation of kinase activity is frequently associated with cancer, ocasionally arising from chromosomal translocation events that relocate genes encoding kinases. Fusion proteins resulting from such events, particularly those involving the proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1), manifest as constitutively active kinases, emphasizing their role in oncogenesis. Notably, the chromosomal reallocation of the ros1 gene leads to fusion of proteins with the ROS1 kinase domain, implicated in various cancer types. Despite their prevalence, targeted inhibition of these fusion proteins relies on repurposed kinase inhibitors. This review comprehensively surveys experimentally determined ROS1 structures, emphasizing the pivotal role of X-ray crystallography in providing high-quality insights. We delve into the intricate interactions between ROS1 and kinase inhibitors, shedding light on the structural basis for inhibition. Additionally, we explore point mutations identified in patients, employing molecular modeling to elucidate their structural impact on the ROS1 kinase domain. By integrating structural insights with in vitro and in silico data, this review advances our understanding of ROS1 kinase in cancer, offering potential avenues for targeted therapeutic strategies.

KLC1-ROS1 Fusion Exerts Oncogenic Properties of Glioma Cells via Specific Activation of JAK-STAT Pathway.

Here, we investigated the detailed molecular oncogenic mechanisms of a novel receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) fusion, KLC1-ROS1, with an adapter molecule, KLC1, and an RTK, ROS1, discovered in pediatric glioma, and we explored a novel therapeutic target for glioma that possesses oncogenic RTK fusion. When wild-type ROS1 and KLC1-ROS1 fusions were stably expressed in the human glioma cell lines A172 and U343MG, immunoblotting revealed that KLC1-ROS1 fusion specifically activated the JAK2-STAT3 pathway, a major RTK downstream signaling pathway, when compared with wild-type ROS1. Immunoprecipitation of the fractionated cell lysates revealed a more abundant association of the KLC1-ROS1 fusion with JAK2 than that observed for wild-type ROS1 in the cytosolic fraction. A mutagenesis study of the KLC1-ROS1 fusion protein demonstrated the fundamental roles of both the KLC1 and ROS1 domains in the constitutive activation of KLC1-ROS1 fusion. Additionally, in vitro assays demonstrated that KLC1-ROS1 fusion upregulated cell proliferation, invasion, and chemoresistance when compared to wild-type ROS1. Combination treatment with the chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide and an inhibitor of ROS1, JAK2, or a downstream target of STAT3, demonstrated antitumor effects against KLC1-ROS1 fusion-expressing glioma cells. Our results demonstrate that KLC1-ROS1 fusion exerts oncogenic activity through serum-independent constitutive activation, resulting in specific activation of the JAK-STAT pathway. Our data suggested that molecules other than RTKs may serve as novel therapeutic targets for RTK fusion in gliomas.

Preclinical evidence for anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors as novel therapeutic treatments for cholangiocarcinoma.

Bile duct cancer (cholangiocarcinoma, CCA) has a poor prognosis for patients, and despite recent advances in targeted therapies for other cancer types, it is still treated with standard chemotherapy. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has been shown to be a primary driver of disease progression in lung cancer, and ALK inhibitors are effective therapeutics in aberrant ALK-expressing tumors. Aberrant ALK expression has been documented in CCA, but the use of ALK inhibitors has not been investigated. Using CCA cell lines and close-to-patient primary cholangiocarcinoma cells, we investigated the potential for ALK inhibitors in CCA. ALK, cMET, and ROS1 expression was determined in CCA patient tissue by immunohistochemistry and digital droplet polymerase chain reaction, and that in cell lines was determined by immunoblot and immunofluorescence. The effect on cell viability and mechanism of action of ALK, cMet, and ROS1 inhibitors was determined in CCA cell lines. To determine whether ceritinib could affect primary CCA cells, tissue was taken from four patients with biliary tract cancer, without ALK rearrangement, mutation, or overexpression, and grown in three-dimensional tumor growth assays in the presence or absence of humanized mesenchymal cells. ALK and cMet but not ROS were both upregulated in CCA tissues and cell lines. Cell survival was inhibited by crizotinib, a c-met/ALK/ROS inhibitor. To determine the mechanism of this effect, we tested c-Met-specific and ALK/ROS-specific inhibitors, capmatinib and ceritinib, respectively. Whereas capmatinib did not affect cell survival, ceritinib dose-dependently inhibited survival in all cell lines, with IC50 ranging from 1 to 9 µM and co-treatments with gemcitabine and cisplatin further sensitized cells, with IC50 ranging from IC50 0.60 to 2.32 µM. Ceritinib did not inhibit cMet phosphorylation but did inhibit ALK phosphorylation. ALK was not mutated in any of these cell lines. Only ceritinib inhibited 3D growth of all four patient samples below mean peak serum concentration, in the presence and absence of mesenchymal cells, whereas crizotinib and capmatinib failed to do this. Ceritinib appeared to exert its effect more through autophagy than apoptosis. These results indicate that ceritinib or other ALK/ROS inhibitors could be therapeutically useful in cholangiocarcinoma even in the absence of aberrant ALK/ROS1 expression.

Abstract C148: Type II ROS1 inhibitors and their liability on ROS1 rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with L2086F mutation

Abstract Introduction: Fusion oncoproteins involving the ROS1 receptor tyrosine kinase have been established as validated therapeutic targets in non-small cell lung cancer. FDA-approved ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as crizotinib and entrectinib have shown substantial response rates in these patients, leading to improved outcomes. Historically, the solvent-front ROS1 kinase mutation, G2032R, was a recurrent resistance liability to first generation ROS1 TKI. Next-generation TKIs, including NVL-520, repotrectinib, and taletrectinib are active against the ROS1 G2032R and shown activity in both treatment-naïve and ROS1 G2032R acquired resistance setting. We and others showed that ROS1 L2086F a mutation in catalytic-spine 6 within the kinase domain confers resistance to all first and next-generation type I binding mode TKIs. Cabozantinib, a type II ROS1 inhibitor, is the only FDA-approved TKI that has showed clinical activity against ROS1 L2086F. Recent reports indicated that gilteritinib, an FLT3 TKI, exhibits activity against ALK L1256 (homologous to ROS1 L2086F). In this study, we investigated the efficacy of gilteritinib compared to cabozantinib in ROS1 L2086F resistance model systems. Methods: We tested the effectiveness of ROS1 TKI compared to gilteritinib in Ba/F3 cell lines expressing CD74-ROS1 and EZR-ROS1 resistant mutations. Additionally, we quantified the efficacy of cabozantinib and gilteritinib in ROS1 L2086F using soft agar assays. We engineered CRISPR-Cas9 genome-edited CUTO-28 cells expressing endogenous L2086F mutation, and to validate the activity of gilteritinib and cabozantinib against ROS1 L2086F. Results: The ROS1 kinase mutations F2004C, G2032R and L2086F are resistant to entrectinib inhibition. Cabozantinib, consistent with our previous published data, retains inhibitory activity against ROS1 G2032R and ROS1 L2086F, however the ROS1 F2004C mutation imposes cabozantinib-resistance. Gilteritinib, intriguingly, is active with IC50 ≤ 25 nM against ROS1 F2004C and ROS1 L2086F but not ROS1 G2032R. Immunoblotting studies showed on-target inhibition of ROS1 auto-phosphorylation and effector ERK1/2 activation in the case of ROS1 L2086F mutant cells treated with cabozantinib and gilteritinib. Conclusion: Gilteritinib demonstrates inhibitory activity against ROS1 L2086F mutation. Currently, patients with ROS1 L2086F resistance can be treated with cabozantinib as a second-line treatment option. The preclinical data presented herein suggest that gilteritinib could be an additional, potentially viable alternative to target the highly resistant ROS1 L2086F mutation. Additional studies are needed to explore the use of gilteritinib for ROS1 rearranged NSCLC. Citation Format: Rajat Thawani, Clare Keddy, Matteo Repetto, Kristen Jones, Katelyn Nicholson, Zoe Beach, Alexander Drilon, Monika Davare. Type II ROS1 inhibitors and their liability on ROS1 rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with L2086F mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C148.

Lorlatinib and capmatinib in a ROS1-rearranged NSCLC with MET-driven resistance: tumor response and evolution

Acquired drug resistance remains a major problem across oncogene-addicted cancers. Elucidation of mechanisms of resistance can inform rational treatment strategies for patients relapsing on targeted therapies while offering insights into tumor evolution. Here, we report acquired MET amplification as a resistance driver in a ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma after sequential treatment with ROS1 inhibitors. Subsequent combination therapy with lorlatinib plus capmatinib, a MET-selective inhibitor, induced intracranial and extracranial tumor response. At relapse, sequencing of the resistant tumor revealed a MET D1246N mutation and loss of MET amplification. We performed integrated molecular analyses of serial tumor and plasma samples, unveiling dynamic alterations in the ROS1 fusion driver and MET bypass axis at genomic and protein levels and the emergence of polyclonal resistance. This case illustrates the complexity of longitudinal tumor evolution with sequential targeted therapies, highlighting challenges embedded in the current precision oncology paradigm and the importance of developing approaches that prevent resistance.

Differential network analysis of ROS1 inhibitors reveals lorlatinib polypharmacology through co-targeting PYK2

Multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are often developed for the same indication. However, their relative overall efficacy is frequently incompletely understood and they may harbor unrecognized targets that cooperate with the intended target. We compared several ROS1 TKIs for inhibition of ROS1-fusion-positive lung cancer cell viability, ROS1 autophosphorylation and kinase activity, which indicated disproportionately higher cellular potency of one TKI, lorlatinib. Quantitative chemical and phosphoproteomics across four ROS1 TKIs and differential network analysis revealed that lorlatinib uniquely impacted focal adhesion signaling. Functional validation using pharmacological probes, RNA interference, and CRISPR-Cas9 knockout uncovered a polypharmacology mechanism of lorlatinib by dual targeting ROS1 and PYK2, which form a multiprotein complex with SRC. Rational multi-targeting of this complex by combining lorlatinib with SRC inhibitors exhibited pronounced synergy. Taken together, we show that systems pharmacology-based differential network analysis can dissect mixed canonical/non-canonical polypharmacology mechanisms across multiple TKIs enabling the design of rational drug combinations.

MIG6 Mediates Adaptive and Acquired Resistance to ALK/ROS1 Fusion Kinase Inhibition through EGFR Bypass Signaling.

Despite the initial benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting oncogenic ALK and ROS1 gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer, complete responses are rare and resistance ultimately emerges from residual tumor cells. Although several acquired resistance mechanisms have been reported at the time of disease progression, adaptative resistance mechanisms that contribute to residual diseases before the outgrowth of tumor cells with acquired resistance are less clear. For the patients who have progressed after TKI treatments, but do not demonstrate ALK/ROS1 kinase mutations, there is a lack of biomarkers to guide effective treatments. Herein, we found that phosphorylation of MIG6, encoded by the ERRFI1 gene, was downregulated by ALK/ROS1 inhibitors as were mRNA levels, thus potentiating EGFR activity to support cell survival as an adaptive resistance mechanism. MIG6 downregulation was sustained following chronic exposure to ALK/ROS1 inhibitors to support the establishment of acquired resistance. A higher ratio of EGFR to MIG6 expression was found in ALK TKI-treated and ALK TKI-resistant tumors and correlated with the poor responsiveness to ALK/ROS1 inhibition in patient-derived cell lines. Furthermore, we identified and validated a MIG6 EGFR-binding domain truncation mutation in mediating resistance to ROS1 inhibitors but sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors. A MIG6 deletion was also found in a patient after progressing to ROS1 inhibition. Collectively, this study identifies MIG6 as a novel regulator for EGFR-mediated adaptive and acquired resistance to ALK/ROS1 inhibitors and suggests EGFR to MIG6 ratios and MIG6-damaging alterations as biomarkers to predict responsiveness to ALK/ROS1 and EGFR inhibitors.