ROS1 Protein Expression Research Articles

EP11.01-007 Tracking ROS1 Fusions in NSCLC - Mirage or Truth When Screening the Desert

Patients with a ROS1-rearrangement are sensitive to targeted treatment with ROS1-inhibitors. However, only 0.5-2% of NSCLC-patients harbor this activating fusion. In order to detect these cases, immunohistochemical (IHC) screening for ROS1-protein expression has been suggested. However, there is a debate about the reliability of such an assay and the comparability of available antibody clones. The aim of this study was to determine the presence of ROS1 fusions in two large NSCLC-cohorts and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of current detection strategies.

P59.27 Complementary Utility of Combined ALK/ROS1 FISH with Immunohistochemistry for ALK/ROS1 Rearrangement Testing in Lung Cancer

Testing for EGFR mutations, ALK and ROS1 rearrangements and BRAF mutations are now recommended as the essential minimum predictive biomarkers to be tested in primary non-squamous NSCLC patients presenting with advanced disease. While the ALK D5F3 Ventana immunohistochemistry (IHC) Assay is approved for detection of ALK rearrangements and for targeted therapy, ROS1 IHC only serves as a screening tool for ROS1 rearrangements with demonstration of gene fusions by molecular methods required for confirmation and targeted treatment. Nevertheless, equivocal IHC results, although uncommon, still occur with the D5F3 ALK assay necessitating complementary methods for confirmation. The recent availability of combined ALK/ROS1 break-apart fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) probes offer the advantage of tissue conservation with ability to analyse both gene alterations in a single tissue section. The aim of the present study was to study the utility of the combined ALK/ROS1 FISH assay as a complement to ALK and ROS1 IHC in routine predictive biomarker testing algorithms. Over a 6-year study period, all EGFR wild type NSCLC samples were subject to automated ALK D5F3 Ventana IHC assay and ROS1 IHC using the D4D6 (Cell signalling technology) clone as a manual lab developed test. Diffuse strong granular staining in tumor cells for ALK and ROS1 protein was interpreted as positive. All cases of equivocal ALK staining and positive ROS1 staining was subject to combined ALK/ROS1 FISH using the FlexISH ALK/ROS1 DistinguISH Probe (Vysis) performed as per manufacturers’ instructions. Presence of ALK/ROS1 break apart signals and/or isolated ALK/ROS1 3’ signals in >15% of interpretable tumour nuclei was considered as positive for ALK or ROS1 rearrangement. The ALK Ventana Assay was performed in 711 formalin fixed paraffin embedded EGFR wild type NSCLC samples including biopsies, lymph node excisions and cell blocks. Of these, 12% (85/711) were positive, 2% (13/711) were equivocal, 75% (539/711) were negative, while in the remaining 11% (76/711), result could not be evaluated due to exhaustion of tumor tissue. FISH analysis in four of the ALK IHC equivocal cases show absence of ALK translocations while no tissue remained for FISH analysis in the remaining equivocal cases. ROS1 IHC was performed in 434 cases of the above cohort of which 7% (30/434) were positive. ROS1 immunopositivity was enriched among ALK IHC positive cases with 43% (19/44) of ALK IHC positive cases also showing protein expression of ROS1. FISH analysis revealed ROS1 translocation in two cases (both showing diffuse strong ROS1 protein expression and negative ALK IHC) while all dual ALK/ROS IHC positive cases tested by FISH showed presence of only ALK rearrangements with non-rearranged ROS1 signals. Tissue adequacy remains the major limiting factor for predictive biomarker testing in lung cancer. The use of combined ALK-ROS FISH allows for excellent demonstration of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in the same section using the same criteria validated in single gene break apart FISH probes. ROS1 protein is commonly overexpressed in ALK rearranged NSCLC and may represent cross reactivity with ALK or a related protein.

Correlating ROS1 Protein Expression With ROS1 Fusions, Amplifications, and Mutations

IntroductionIn this study, we sought to further characterize ROS1 protein expression in solid tumors with the complete spectrum of ROS1 genomic alterations. MethodsROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using the ROS1 (SP384) class I assay per manufacturer’s instructions on a variety of solid tumors (n = 32) with known ROS1 genomic alterations. Genomic alterations included fusions (n = 17), gene amplifications (n = 10), and short-variant mutations (n = 11). ResultsOf the 32 cases with ROS1 IHC results, 100% (11 of 11) with canonical ROS1 fusions were positive for ROS1 IHC. Among noncanonical ROS1 fusions, only two (of five) cases with SQSTM1-ROS1 and RDX-ROS1 fusions were positive for ROS1 IHC whereas PTPRK-ROS1 (two) and TTC28-ROS1 fusions were negative for ROS1 IHC. One sample with a canonical ROS1 fusion and co-occurring ROS1 resistance mutation (6094G>A, p.G2032R) was positive for ROS1 IHC. A total of 10% (one of 10) of ROS1 amplified tumors were positive for ROS1 IHC. None of the cases (zero of five) with ROS1 short-variant mutations were positive for ROS1 protein expression. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that if ROS1 IHC was used as a screening tool for ROS1 fusion, a subset of fusion-negative tumors will reveal positive IHC staining highlighting the value of reflexing to genomic profiling to confirm the presence of a targetable fusion-driver before the initiation of therapy. In addition, the ability of comprehensive genomic profiling to detect ROS1 resistance mutations will be important for clinical decision making.

Evaluation of a new diagnostic immunohistochemistry approach for ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundROS1 rearrangement is an oncogenic driver of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accurate detection of ROS1 rearrangements in clinical tumor samples is vital. In this study, a new immunohistochemistry (IHC) monoclonal antibody (mAb) 1A1 assay was evaluated in patients with NSCLC. MethodsA cohort (cohort A) of 22 positive ROS1 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) samples were studied to evaluate the IHC-1A1 assay by comparing IHC-D4D6 mAb and another cohort (cohort B) of 178 consecutive cases to verify the assay by comparison using the RT-PCR method. IHC results with 2+ (H-score > 100) or 3+ staining was considered ROS1-positive. ResultsIn cohort A, ROS1 protein expression was evaluated in 22 samples by IHC-D4D6 and IHC-1A1 assays. For IHC-1A1, one patient was 1+ and 11 patients were 1+ for IHC-D4D6. ROS1 2–3+ was found in 36.4 % (8/22) of samples with IHC-D4D6 and 90.9 % (20/22) with IHC-1A1.The mean H-score of the 1A1 ROS1 2-3+ cases was 203.5. With the D4D6 clone, the mean H-score of the D4D6 ROS1 2∼3+ cases was 182.5. In the 178 NSCLC patients in cohort B, ROS1 rearrangement was detected with IHC and RT-PCR assays. Two patients had tumors with ROS1 IHC-1A1 3+ and one patient was IHC-1A1 2+. Among the three patients, two were confirmed to have ROS1 rearrangement by RT-PCR. None of the 175 ROS1 IHC-1A1 0–1+ samples were ROS1-positive by RT-PCR. ConclusionsThe results showed that the new IHC-1A1 ROS1 clone is a sensitive preliminary method and may be another excellent screening method in addition to the original IHC detection method to detect ROS1 gene rearrangements.

ROS-1 re-arrangements and c-MET amplifications in adenocarcinoma lung: A tertiary care center study from North India.

C-ros oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS 1) proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS-1) fusions are potent oncogenic drivers and these re-arrangements promote signal transduction programs leading to uninhibited cell survival and proliferation identified in 1-2% of cases of nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) receptor tyrosine kinase and its ligand are predominantly involved in epithelial mesenchymal transition and tissue regeneration. The MET amplification and overexpression is oncogenic in 3-7% cases. The objectives of this study were to identify the frequency of ROS-1 and c-MET protein expression in adenocarcinoma lung and to correlate it with the clinicopathological parameters and to analyze the histomorphology of cases that harbor the characteristic mutations (c-MET and ROS-1). Study group comprised a prospective cases series of 90 cases of adenocarcinoma lung. ROS-1 protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry using the D4D6 rabbit monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA) and c-MET protein expressed was analyzed using the SP-44 clone (Ventana Medical Systems). c-MET protein expression was identified in 33.33% cases (n = 30/90) with statistically significant thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) positivity. ROS-1 protein expression was detected in 3.33% cases (n-3/90), in biopsies from the respiratory tree with TTF-1 expression. This is the first study from the Indian subcontinent to identify the frequency of ROS-1 re-arrangements and MET amplification in the Indian population. The availability of targeted therapy that has a significant impact on survival makes it essential to detect these less frequent mutations.

A study detection of the ROS1 gene fusion by FISH and ROS1 protein expression by IHC methods in patients with ovarian malignant or borderline serous tumors

ObjectiveROS1 is an orphan receptor protein tyrosine kinase which is supposed to undergo genetic rearrangement in carcinogenesis. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the frequency and clinicopathologic features associated with ROS1 gene fusion and ROS1 protein expression in patients with ovarian serous carcinoma or serous borderline tumors. Materials and methodsTissue samples of 102 patients with high or low grade serous carcinoma and borderline serous tumors were selected randomly from the archives of Department of Gyneco-pathology, and analyzed for ROS1 gene expression. (Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method was used to assess ROS1 gene rearrangement, while ROS1 protein expression was analyzed using immunohistochemistry. ResultsThe study consisted of 94 cases of high-grade serous carcinoma (92.1%), 2 cases of low-grade serous carcinoma (%2) and 6 cases of serous borderline tumor (5.9%). ROS1 gene rearrangement analysis revealed that 4 patients (3.9%) were FISH-positive; whereas the immunohistochemical analysis yielded only 1 patient (0.9%) exhibiting faint positive expression of ROS1 protein. Given the low incidences of ROS1 gene rearrangement and protein expression, their relationships with clinicopathologic parameters could not be statistically analyzed. ConclusionAlthough rare, patients with ovarian serous carcinoma or serous borderline tumor may exhibit ROS1 gene rearrangement and ROS1 protein expression. Further large-scale studies are necessary to explore the clinicopathologic significance of ROS1 gene expression in ovarian serous carcinoma.

Functional Analyses of PtROS1-RNAi in Poplars and Evaluation of Its Effect on DNA Methylation

DNA methylation occurs mostly at the C5 position of dinucleotide symmetric CpG sites in genomic DNA. A balance is maintained in the plant genome between DNA methylation mediated by RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) and DNA demethylation mediated by the DEMETER (DME) protein family and REPRESSOR OF SILENCING (ROS1). We used double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) silencing to suppress ROS1 protein expression in ‘Nanlin895’ (Populus deltoides × Populus euramericana ‘Nanlin895’). Leaves of WT and transformant poplars revealed more symmetric methylation on CpG sites than roots and stems. In addition, leaves of transformant poplars revealed more methylated CpG sites in both 5.8S rDNA and histone H3 compared to WT types via 0, 50 and 100 mM NaCl treatments. In asymmetric methylation sites, transformant poplars exhibited more methylated CpHpG and CpHpH contexts than WT poplars. On the other hand, hypermethylation induced by PtROS1-RNAi construct resulted in pleiotropic phenotypic changes in transgenic poplars. The percentage of wavy leaves was increased maximum by ~45% in transgenic poplars. Also, the number of leaves was increased by ~200 number in transformants. Furthermore, shooting (%) and rooting (%) was decreased in transgenic poplars versus WT.

Rare Incidence of ROS1 Rearrangement in Cholangiocarcinoma.

PurposeThe recent discovery and characterization of an oncogenic ROS1 gene rearrangement has raised significant interest because small molecule inhibitors are effective in these tumors. The aim of this study was to determine frequency and clinicopathological features associated with ROS1 rearrangement in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).Materials and MethodsA total of 261 patients who underwent surgery for CCA between October 1997 and August 2013 were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. ROS1 rearrangement was evaluated by break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization using tissue microarrays of these patients.ResultsOf 261 CCA evaluated, three cases (1.1%) showed ROS1 rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), all of which were derived from intrahepatic origin. ROS1 protein expression was observed in 38 samples (19.1%). Significantly larger tumor size was observed in ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC)–negative patients compared with ROS1 IHC–positive patients. ROS1 FISH–positive patients had a single tumor with a median size of 4 cm and well-to-moderate differentiation. Overall, there was no difference in terms of baseline characteristics, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival between ROS1-positive and -negative patients.ConclusionROS1 rearrangement was detected in 1.1% of CCA patients. Although rare, conduct of clinical trials using ROS1 inhibitors in these genetically unique patients is warranted.

Clinical and pathological significance of ROS1 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BackgroundMore knowledge about genetic and molecular features of cholangiocarcinoma is needed to develop effective therapeutic strategies. We investigated the clinical and pathological significance of ROS1 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsOne hundred ninety-four patients with curatively resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were included in this study. Tumor tissue specimens were collected and analyzed for ROS1 gene rearrangement using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and ROS1 protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC).ResultsROS1 immunohistochemistry was positive (moderate or strong staining) in 72 tumors (37.1 %). ROS1 protein expression was significantly correlated with well differentiated tumors, papillary or mucinous histology, oncocytic/hepatoid or intestinal type tumors, and periductal infiltrating or intraductal growing tumors (vs. mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma). ROS-expressing tumors were associated with better disease-free survival (30.1 months for ROS1 expression (+) tumors vs. 9.0 months for ROS1 (−) tumors, p = 0.006). Moreover, ROS1 expression was an independent predictor of better disease-free survival in a multivariate analysis (HR 0.607, 95 % CI 0.377–0.976; p = 0.039). Although break-apart FISH was successfully performed in 102 samples, a split pattern indicative of ROS1 gene rearrangement was not found in the examined samples.ConclusionROS1 protein expression was associated with well-differentiated histology and better survival in our patients with resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. ROS1 gene rearrangement by break-apart FISH was not found in the examined samples.

Frequent aerogenous spread with decreased E-cadherin expression of ROS1-rearranged lung cancer predicts poor disease-free survival.

ROS1 rearrangement has been found in a subset of lung cancer and ROS1-rearranged tumors are sensitive to ALK kinase inhibitors. This study sought to evaluate the clinicopathological implications and histomorphological characteristics of ROS1-rearranged tumors, especially micropapillary and aerogenous spread growth and to investigate the usefulness of ROS1 immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic test for ROS1 rearrangement. ROS1 rearrangement characterizations by fluorescence in situ hybridization and ROS1 protein and E-cadherin expression by immunohistochemistry were performed using 754 non-small cell lung cancer surgical specimens. ROS1 rearrangement was identified in 10 samples. Histologically, all 10 ROS1-rearranged tumors harbored an adenocarcinoma component. Significantly, we noted a high association between ROS1 rearrangement with a micropapillary component (p<0.001), aerogenous spread (p=0.002), and E-cadherin loss (p=0.049). Survival analysis showed that ROS1 rearrangement was significantly associated with a higher risk of tumor recurrence (p=0.024). The best criterion to detect ROS1-rearrangement by immunohistochemistry was an H-score of ≥100, with a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 93.5%, respectively. ROS1-rearranged adenocarcinoma exhibited distinct morphological and clinicopathological features. Decreased membranous E-cadherin expression and aerogenous spread may be associated with worse disease-free survival. ROS1 immunohistochemistry correlated well with ROS1 gene rearrangement.

Comparison of Methods in the Detection of ALK and ROS1 Rearrangements in Lung Cancer

The use of targeted therapies toward specific oncogenic driver mutations has become a critical factor in the treatment of patients with lung cancer. It is therefore essential to utilize tests with high performance characteristics. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the standard method for detecting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS1 rearrangements in non-small-cell lung cancer but the utility of other methods such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is unclear. Three hundred and sixty-two lung cancer patients were tested with FISH, CISH, and IHC using three ALK antibodies (ALK1, 5A4, D5F3) and one ROS1 antibody in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements. There was a 97.4% concordance (298 of 306) between FISH and CISH for detection of ALK rearrangements. The ROS1 rearrangement status had a 97% (291 of 300) concordance between CISH and FISH. ALK protein expression was observed in 6 of 341 samples with the ALK1 and 5A4 antibodies and 5 of 341 samples with D5F3. All three antibodies stained each of the ALK FISH-positive samples (100% sensitivity). ROS1 protein expression was observed in 2 of 322 samples. One of three samples with a ROS1 rearrangement by FISH showed ROS1 protein expression (33.3% sensitivity). Our findings show good correlation between FISH versus CISH in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements. FISH versus IHC showed good correlation in the detection of ALK rearrangements but showed weak correlation in the detection of ROS1 rearrangements. These results suggest CISH and IHC could be complimentary detection methods to FISH in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements.

Discrepancies between FISH and immunohistochemistry for assessment of the ALK status are associated with ALK ‘borderline’-positive rearrangements or a high copy number: a potential major issue for anti-ALK therapeutic strategies

BackgroundPatients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas expressing ALK rearrangements are highly responsive to crizotinib, a dual ALK/c-MET inhibitor. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an easy clinically and routinely applicable cost-effective assay for ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression for potential treatment with crizotinib. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the percentage and the pattern of ALK-rearranged cells, the variation in the native ALK copy number, as well as ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression, and their significance on outcome of crizotinib-treated lung adenocarcinoma patients. Patients and methodsConsecutive lung adenocarcinoma specimens (n = 176) ‘double-negative’ (wild-type EGFR and KRAS) were tested for ALK rearrangements/copy number alterations and for ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression using automated standardized protocols. Preliminary data on the outcome of crizotinib-treated patients were recorded. ResultsFISH analysis identified 26/176 (15%) cases with ALK rearrangements. Seven cases had discordant results between the ALK FISH and IHC. Five cases with discordant FISH-positive/IHC-negative revealed FISH ‘borderline’ positivity (15%–20%). Three cases overexpressed c-MET and responded to crizotinib, and two cases with ALK-‘borderline’ rearranged cells only, not associated with c-MET expression, progressed under crizotinib. Two cases with discordant FISH-negative/IHC-positive revealed ALK gene amplification without associated c-MET or ROS1 protein expression. ConclusionsThe discrepancies observed between the IHC and FISH data revealed unexpected biological events, rather than technical issues, which potentially can have a strong impact on the therapeutic strategy with crizotinib.

ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Among Major Genotypes of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundROS1 gene fusions cause several cancers by constitutively activating the ROS1 tyrosine kinase receptor. ROS1-targeted inhibitor therapy improves survival in the approximately 1% to 2% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma with ROS1 gene fusions. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the standard diagnostic procedure for detecting ROS1 rearrangements, we studied immunohistochemistry (IHC). Materials and MethodsROS1 IHC was performed on a selected cohort of 33 lung adenocarcinoma whole tissue specimens with alterations in the EGFR (n = 5), KRAS (n = 5), ERBB2 (HER2) (n = 3), ROS1 (n = 6), ALK (n = 5), and RET (n = 3) genes and pan-negative (n = 6) detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and FISH. ResultsIn the cohort of 33 specimens, both ROS1 gene fusion using RT-PCR and high ROS1 protein expression using IHC were detected in 6 specimens. Of these 6 specimens, 5 were also positive by FISH for ROS1 gene rearrangements. All 27 lung cancer specimens that were negative for ROS1 rearrangements by genetic testing had no to low ROS1 protein expression. ConclusionWe have optimized ROS1 IHC and scoring to provide high sensitivity and specificity for detecting ROS1 gene rearrangements in whole tissue. ROS1 IHC could be a practical and cost-effective method to screen for ROS1 gene rearrangements.

ROS1 Immunohistochemistry for Detection of ROS1-Rearranged Lung Adenocarcinomas

ROS1 gene rearrangements are reported in 1% to 2% of lung adenocarcinomas (ACAs) and are associated with response to the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib. ROS1 rearrangements can be detected using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); however, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ROS1 protein is a promising alternate screening modality. In this study, we examine the correlation between ROS1 IHC and FISH and describe the clinicopathologic characteristics of ROS1-rearranged lung tumors. ROS1 IHC was performed using clone D4D6 on whole-tissue sections. In a validation cohort, IHC was compared with ROS1 break-apart FISH in 53 cases of lung ACA enriched for an absence of known genetic alterations and never-smoking status. In a screening cohort, we performed ROS1 IHC on 167 consecutive cases of lung ACA from a routine molecular diagnostic practice and confirmed positive results by FISH. In the validation cohort, 6 cases (11%) were both FISH and IHC positive. One FISH-negative case was strongly ROS1 IHC positive. All IHC-negative cases were FISH negative. In the screening cohort, 2 of 167 (1.2%) had strong, diffuse ROS1 protein expression; a rearrangement was confirmed by FISH in both. ROS1-translocated tumors were wild type for EGFR, KRAS, and ALK and commonly had solid growth with mucinous/cribriform features and psammomatous calcification. ROS1 protein expression in tumor cells is 100% sensitive and 92% specific for ROS1 rearrangements by FISH. ROS1 IHC is an effective screening tool for this rare but clinically important subset of lung ACAs.