Ropinirole In Patients Research Articles

Ophthalmologic Baseline Characteristics and 2-Year Ophthalmologic Safety Profile of Pramipexole IR Compared with Ropinirole IR in Patients with Early Parkinson's Disease.

Background. Parkinson's disease (PD) progressively affects dopaminergic neurotransmission and may affect retinal dopaminergic functions and structures. Objective. This 2-year randomized, open-label, parallel-group, flexible-dose study, NCT00144300, evaluated ophthalmologic safety profiles of immediate-release (IR) pramipexole and ropinirole in patients with early idiopathic PD with ≤6 months' prior dopamine agonist exposure and without preexisting major eye disorders. Methods. Patients received labeled IR regimens of pramipexole (n = 121) or ropinirole (n = 125) for 2 years. Comprehensive ophthalmologic assessments (COA) included corrected acuity, Roth 28-color test, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure, computerized visual field test, fundus photography, and electroretinography. Results. At baseline, we observed retinal pigmentary epithelium (RPE) hypopigmentation not previously reported in PD patients. The estimated relative risk of 2-year COA worsening with pramipexole versus ropinirole was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.71–1.60). Mean changes from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating System parts II+III total scores (pramipexole: 1 year, −4.1 ± 8.9, and 2 years, −0.7 ± 10.1, and ropinirole: 1 year, −3.7 ± 8.2, and 2 years, −1.7 ± 10.5) and Hoehn–Yahr stage distribution showed therapeutic effects on PD symptoms. Safety profiles were consistent with labeling. Conclusions. The risk of retinal deterioration did not differ in early idiopathic PD patients receiving pramipexole versus ropinirole. RPE hypopigmentation at baseline was not previously reported in this population. This trial is registered with NCT00144300.

Ropinirole in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome and Baseline IRLS Total Scores ≥24: Efficacy and Tolerability in a 26-Week, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study Followed by a 40-Week Open-Label Extension

BackgroundAs with studies of other dopamine agonists, previously reported studies of ropinirole in restless legs syndrome (RLS) recruited patients with baseline International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) total scores ≥15. The reported pooled analyses of clinical trials data suggest benefits of ropinirole in patients with IRLS total scores ≥24, but the effects of ropinirole have not been prospectively evaluated in this patient population. ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ropinirole in patients with RLS and baseline IRLS total scores ≥24. This study was conducted in part to fulfill a postlicensing commitment between the maker of ropinirole and the European Union’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. MethodsThe protocol for this study comprised a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 26-week phase during which adults with baseline IRLS total scores ≥24 received a ropinirole dose from 0.25 to 4 mg (n = 197) or placebo (n = 207) followed by a 40-week, open-label phase during which all patients (n = 269) received ropinirole. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in the IRLS total score at week 12. Tolerability measures included the incidence of adverse events, augmentation, and early morning rebound. Due to the possibility of a treatment-by–center group interaction (P = 0.04) in the IRLS analysis, further efficacy exploratory analyses were performed to assess the impact of the interaction on the overall assessment of efficacy. ResultsDemographic characteristics were comparable between groups (mean [SD] age: placebo, 56.1 [11.38] years; ropinirole, 56.5 [11.92] years; 63% female in both groups). All of the patients in the ropinirole group were white; 99% of the placebo group was white. Ropinirole was significantly better than placebo for change from baseline in the IRLS total score during both short- and long-term treatment, with mean treatment differences of –2.1 (P = 0.039) and –2.5 (P = 0.023) for weeks 12 and 26, respectively. A statistically significant treatment by center group interaction was observed (P = 0.040) for the change from baseline in IRLS total score, indicating variation of treatment effects among center groups; however, all center groups showed an improvement from baseline at both week 12 and week 26 for the ropinirole immediate-release group and the placebo group. The incidences of augmentation and early morning rebound were ≤4% for ropinirole. The adverse event profile of ropinirole was consistent with that reported in previous clinical trials. ConclusionsIn this subset of patients with RLS and a baseline IRLS total score ≥24, ropinirole was effective and well tolerated compared with placebo. The incidence of augmentation and early morning rebound in this study was low. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00329602.

Systematic evaluation of augmentation during treatment with ropinirole in restless legs syndrome (Willis‐Ekbom Disease): Results from a prospective, multicenter study over 66 weeks

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of augmentation over 66 weeks of treatment with ropinirole in patients with primary restless legs syndrome (RLS). Augmentation is the main complication of long-term dopaminergic treatment of RLS. Despite widespread use of ropinirole in RLS, no studies have prospectively and systematically assessed the incidence of augmentation with its use. The study consisted of 26 weeks of double-blind flexible-dose treatment with ropinirole or placebo, followed by 40 weeks of open-label ropinirole treatment.. Patients had no previous history of augmentation. Potential cases of augmentation were identified with the Structured Interview for the Diagnosis of Augmentation and the Augmentation Severity Rating Scale and through reporting of adverse events. Cases were blindly evaluated by an expert panel using the NIH diagnostic criteria for augmentation. Four hundred and four patients participated in the double-blind study and 269 in the open-label phase, with a discontinuation rate of 42%. IRLS baseline scores improved at the end of the double-blind (DB) phase (mean ± SE) by -15.9 ± 0.76 for ropinirole, by -13.4 ± 0.77 for placebo (P < .05) and by -20.4 ± 0.55 during the open-label phase. The incidence rates of augmentation were 3.5% for ropinirole and <1% for placebo during the DB phase and 3% during the open-label phase. Clinically significant augmentation occurred in 3%, <1%, and 2%, respectively. Discontinuation of treatment occurred in 50% of all patients (7 of 14) with augmentation. The incidence of augmentation was 3.1% higher with ropinirole than with placebo. New patients with first episodes of augmentation continued to cumulate at a stable rate over the duration of this study.

Aripiprazole and Ropinirole Treatment for Cocaine Dependence: Evidence from a Pilot Study

Currently, there is no specific pharmacological therapy with established efficacy for the treatment of cocaine dependence. The aim of this study was to determine the safety, tolerability and the effects of aripiprazole and ropinirole in patients with cocaine dependence. This randomized clinical trial of 12-week duration was carried out on 28 consecutive patients with cocaine dependence presenting for treatment. The diagnostic assessment was performed using ICD-9-CM criteria and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. The Clinical Global Impression Scale, a Visual Analogue Scale to assess craving and a self-report questionnaire on the use of cocaine were administered at baseline and then weekly throughout the study. Urinalyses were carried out three times per weeks to search for benzoylecgonine. Of the 28 study participants, 14 completed the protocol. Treatment discontinuation was unrelated with side effects. One patient required a dosage reduction of ropinirole because of sleepiness and one patient assigned to aripiprazole who reported moderate akathysia had the dosage reduced to 5 mg/day. Routine blood works did not show significant changes from baseline and the overall proportion of positive urinalyses for benzoylecgnonine did not differ significantly between treatments. Using linear mixed-effect models a significant decrease in craving was found in the overall sample (p<0.001). The mean number of cocaine administrations exhibited a faster decrease with aripiprazole compared with ropinirole (p=0.009). Our pilot study indicates that cocaine craving decreases with both aripiprazole and ropinirole treatment but aripiprazole is more efficacious in reducing cocaine use.

Long half-life and prolonged-release dopamine receptor agonists: a review of ropinirole prolonged-release studies

Our review summarizes the five main studies conducted to evaluate the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of ropinirole prolonged release (PR) in Parkinson's disease (PD). The PR formulation was developed with Geomatrix coating technology in order to obtain constant pharmacokinetics throughout 24 hours. The areas under the curve were not significantly different from those observed with similar doses of ropinirole immediate-release (IR) formulation, administered 3 times a day, but concentration fluctuations were less for ropinirole PR (2-fold vs 5-fold). The efficacy study of the PR versus IR formulations showed non-inferiority of the PR formulation, similar tolerability and feasibility of overnight switches, and indicated that the optimal doses of ropinirole in patients with de novo PD is in the range of 8–12 mg/day. The efficacy study in PD patients with motor fluctuations treated with l-dopa showed that adding ropinirole PR significantly reduced “off” time and increased “on” time in comparison with placebo. The study with ropinirole as an add-on to l-dopa showed a reduced incidence of dyskinesias.

Patient- and Physician-Rated Measures Demonstrate the Effectiveness of Ropinirole in the Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome

To investigate the effect of twice-daily ropinirole in patients with early evening restless legs syndrome (RLS) symptoms, particularly focusing on the relationship of patient- and physician-rated assessment of treatment outcomes. In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, 12-week, flexible-dose study, patients with primary RLS, with symptom onset no earlier than 5 PM and a baseline International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) total score > or = 20 received ropinirole 0.5 to 6.0 mg/d twice daily in equally divided doses, or placebo. First dose was 1 hour before the usual onset of symptoms; second dose was 3 to 8 hours after the first. Primary end point: change from baseline in IRLS total score at week 12 last observation carried forward (LOCF). Key secondary end points: proportion of responders (rated "very much improved" or "much improved") on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement and the Patient Global Improvement scales. Improvements in IRLS total score were statistically significantly greater for ropinirole (n = 175), compared with placebo (n = 184) at all assessment points beginning at day 3 through to week 12 LOCF (P < 0.001). A statistically significantly greater proportion of patients were classified as responders on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale at all assessment points from day 3 through week 12 LOCF (P < 0.001) and on the Patient Global Improvement scale at all assessment points from day 1 (P = 0.013) through day 7 LOCF (P < or = 0.05 for days 2-7 LOCF) and at week 12 LOCF (P < 0.001). Ropinirole is associated with consistent early and sustained improvements in the symptoms of RLS, as rated by patients and physicians.

Apathy following subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease: A dopamine responsive symptom

To evaluate the effects of the dopamine D2-D3 agonist ropinirole in patients who developed apathy after complete withdrawal from dopaminergic medication following successful subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation for advanced Parkinson disease (PD). We assessed apathy (Apathy Scale, Apathy Inventory), mood (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale), cognitive functions (Mattis Dementia rating scale, frontal score, executive tests) and motor state (UPDRS-III) in 8 PD patients treated with STN stimulation without dopaminergic treatment and who became apathetic. Assessments were made at baseline and after 6 weeks of ropinirole treatment (7.2 +/- 5.9 mg/d; range 1-18 mg/d). Apathy improved with ropinirole in all but 1 patient (54 +/- 24%; range 0-78%). Mood also improved (75 +/- 31%; range 0-100%), but not in correlation with the change in apathy. Cognitive performance was not modified. Stimulation contacts were located within the STN in all patients except the one who remained apathetic in spite of ropinirole treatment (zona incerta). We suggest that apathy, which was compensated for by an enhancement of D2-D3 receptor stimulation in PD patients with STN stimulation: (1) depends on a dopaminergic deficit in associativo-limbic areas of the brain and (2) can be avoided if a dopaminergic agonist is administered postoperatively.

Clinical efficacy of ropinirole for restless legs syndrome is not affected by age at symptom onset

Objective To determine whether clinical response to the dopamine agonist, ropinirole, in the treatment of primary restless legs syndrome (RLS), depends upon the age-at-onset of RLS symptoms. Methods Pooled data from four 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of ropinirole in patients with moderate-to-severe primary RLS were analyzed post hoc. The relationship between age-at-onset and response to treatment, based on change from the baseline International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) rating scale (the International Restless Legs Scale [IRLS]) total score and the proportion of responders (rated ‘much’/‘very much’ improved) on the Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) scale, was explored. Results The range of age-at-onset of RLS symptoms was 2–75 years. No relationship was observed between the age-at-onset of RLS symptoms and baseline IRLS total score (correlation r = −0.06), and between dose administered at Week 12 last observation carried forward (LOCF) and age-at-onset ( r = −0.04). The age-at-onset by treatment interaction was non-significant ( P = 0.952 for the IRLS and P = 0.716 for the CGI-I scale), indicating there was no significant relationship between age-at-onset and the magnitude of ropinirole treatment effect. Conclusions These data suggest that ropinirole provides effective relief of symptoms, regardless of age at RLS symptom onset.

A 52-week open-label study of the long-term safety of ropinirole in patients with restless legs syndrome

Objective: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) over 52 weeks. Methods: A 52-week, multicentre, open-label continuation study involving 310 patients, conducted in 11 countries. Eligible patients from four parent studies were invited to participate. At parent study entry, all patients had a score of ⩾15 on the International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS). In this continuation study, all participants received ropinirole, 0.25–4.0 mg once daily, for 52 weeks. The primary study objective was to evaluate the safety of ropinirole. Efficacy was assessed by change in IRLS score, as well as by global improvements (clinical global impression [CGI] scale) and improvements in measures of sleep, work productivity, and quality of life. Results: Overall, 251 (81.0%) patients completed the study. The mean ropinirole dose at study end was 1.90 mg/day. A total of 282 patients (91.3%) reported ⩾1 adverse event. For the majority of patients, the reported adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity. The most common adverse event was nausea. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 8.7% of patients. At week 52, IRLS scores improved by an average of 12.0 points from baseline, and 82.8% of patients were ‘much improved’ or ‘very much improved’ on the CGI-improvement scale. Ropinirole treatment was also associated with improvements in measures of sleep and quality of life. Conclusions: Ropinirole was well tolerated and therapeutic efficacy was maintained over 52 weeks in patients with RLS.

Efficacy and tolerability of ropinirole in patients with restless legs syndrome and a baseline IRLS total score ≥ 24 points – data from the ropinirole clinical trial programme

ABSTRACTObjective: Results from one of the largest clinical trial programmes to date of a dopamine agonist in patients with primary restless legs syndrome (RLS) have demonstrated that ropinirole, 0.25– 4.0 mg once daily 1–3 hours before bedtime, is associated with significant improvements in RLS symptoms, sleep parameters and quality-of-life measures, compared with placebo. Analyses were conducted in a subpopulation of patients with a baseline score on the International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) of at least 24 points.Research design and methods: Data was pooled from four, 12‐week, pivotal studies: RESET PLM and TREAT RLS 1, 2 and US.Main outcome measures: Covariate analysis demonstrated that the magnitude of treatment difference between ropinirole and placebo for change in IRLS total score (a measure of RLS symptom severity) increased with increasing baseline IRLS total score. Mean treatment difference was > 3 points in patients with a baseline total score ≥ 24. Among this population, ropinirole treatment was associated with significant reduction in RLS symptom severity compared with placebo, along with significant improvements in global symptoms and sleep measures. A treatment benefit was also observed for measures of quality of life. Ropinirole is well tolerated in this patient population.Conclusions: Patients with primary RLS and baseline IRLS total score ≥ 24 gain clinically meaningful benefits from ropinirole treatment. As with the overall population in the ropinirole clinical trial programme, ropinirole was associated with improvements in RLS symptoms, global symptoms, sleep and quality of life and was well tolerated in patients with a baseline IRLS total score ≥ 24.

Ropinirole is effective in the long‐term management of restless legs syndrome: A randomized controlled trial

The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy of ropinirole in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) and to assess the potential for relapse after the discontinuation of active treatment. Patients with primary RLS (n = 202) received single-blind ropinirole for 24 weeks. Patients meeting treatment continuation criteria were randomized to double-blind treatment with ropinirole or placebo for a further 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients relapsing during double-blind treatment. Additional efficacy measures included time to relapse, withdrawals due to lack of efficacy, improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, change in International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score during double-blind treatment, and changes in sleep and quality of life (QoL) parameters. Significantly fewer patients relapsed on ropinirole than on placebo (32.6% vs. 57.8%; P = 0.0156). Time to relapse was longer with ropinirole and more patients withdrew due to lack of efficacy with placebo. Patients showed improvements in IRLS and CGI-I scores, sleep and QoL parameters with single-blind ropinirole, which were better maintained when ropinirole was continued during the double-blind phase, but reduced with placebo. Ropinirole was well tolerated; adverse events were typical for dopamine agonists. Ropinirole was highly effective and well tolerated in the long-term management of RLS, with pharmacological effect over 36 weeks.

Gabapentin versus Ropinirole in the Treatment of Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome

Dopaminergic agents such as ropinirole are the drugs of first choice in treating restless legs syndrome (RLS). Recently, gabapentin, a structural analogue of γ-aminobutyric acid, has also been shown to improve sensorimotor symptoms in RLS. Therefore, the tolerability and efficacy of randomized treatment with either gabapentin or ropinirole in patients with idiopathic RLS was evaluated in this 4-week open clinical trial. Patients with idiopathic RLS were treated with either 300 mg of gabapentin (n = 8) or 0.5 mg of ropinirole (n = 8) as the initial dose, and the dose was up-titrated until relief of symptoms was achieved (gabapentin mean dosage 800 ± 397 mg, range 300–1,200 mg; ropinirole mean dosage 0.78 ± 0.47 mg, range 0.25–1.50 mg). In both groups, International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group questionnaire scores improved significantly (p ≤ 0.018), whereas the scores of the Epworth sleepiness scale remained unchanged within normal limits. Polysomnographic data showed a reduction of periodic leg movements during sleep (PLMS; p < 0.03) and PLMS index (p < 0.02) in both groups. Side effects were only mild and mostly transient. After 6–10 months of follow-up, in most patients, RLS symptoms were still improved. We conclude that gabapentin and ropinirole provide a similarly well-tolerated and effective treatment of PLMS and sensorimotor symptoms in patients with idiopathic RLS.

Increased risk of somnolence with the new dopamine agonists in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Recent case reports and letters have alerted practitioners to the risk of sleep attacks, usually preceded by somnolence, in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with pramipexole and ropinirole. To quantify the risk of somnolence with the new dopamine agonists pramipexole and ropinirole in patients with Parkinson's disease. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and Cochrane Library, contacted experts and pharmaceutical manufacturers, and manually reviewed all references retrieved to identify possible articles to include. Information on randomisation, blinding, type of treatment and reporting of somnolence were abstracted by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by a third author. We made 2 separate analyses. The first analysis compared the risk of somnolence in patients taking either pramipexole or ropinirole to that in patients taking placebo. The second analysis compared the risk of somnolence with these drugs (plus levodopa) versus that with levodopa alone. We calculated pooled relative risk estimates using the random effects model and when no heterogeneity was detected we used the fixed effects model. Four trials were included in the analysis of patients taking pramipexole or ropinirole compared with those taking placebo. The pooled relative risk of somnolence in this analysis was 4.98 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.79 to 13.89]. Seven trials were included in the analysis of patients taking levodopa and pramipexole or ropinirole compared with those taking levodopa alone. The pooled relative risk was 2.06 (95% CI 1.47 to 2.88). Patients with Parkinson's disease using pramipexole or ropinirole are at higher risk of experiencing somnolence relative to patients taking placebo. Patients taking levodopa plus either one of these dopamine agonists are at higher risk than those taking levodopa alone. Clinicians should carefully weigh this risk against the benefit of these agents when prescribing these drugs.

Ropinirole for restless legs syndrome.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common and underdiagnosed condition that results in a desire to move the extremities often associated with paresthesia/dysesthesia, motor restlessness, worsening of symptoms at rest with at least temporary relief by activity, and worsening of symptoms in the evening or night. We tested the new dopamine agonist ropinirole in 16 patients with RLS in an open-label trial. The mean daily dose was 2.8+/-2.3 mg (range, 0.5-12.0). The 13 patients who completed the study reported a 58.7% improvement (p = 1.08 x 10(-8)) as judged by the abbreviated International Restless Legs Study Group questionnaire. Three patients discontinued the medication secondary to adverse events (rash and nervousness) and other extenuating circumstances. These encouraging preliminary results justify larger and more controlled trials of ropinirole in patients with RLS.

Ropinirole for restless legs syndrome

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common and underdiagnosed condition that results in a desire to move the extremities often associated with paresthesia/dysesthesia, motor restlessness, worsening of symptoms at rest with at least temporary relief by activity, and worsening of symptoms in the evening or night. We tested the new dopamine agonist ropinirole in 16 patients with RLS in an open-label trial. The mean daily dose was 2.8 ± 2.3 mg (range, 0.5–12.0). The 13 patients who completed the study reported a 58.7% improvement (p = 1.08 × 10−8) as judged by the abbreviated International Restless Legs Study Group questionnaire. Three patients discontinued the medication secondary to adverse events (rash and nervousness) and other extenuating circumstances. These encouraging preliminary results justify larger and more controlled trials of ropinirole in patients with RLS.