Root Of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Research Articles

Clinical and pathological features of advanced rectal cancer with submesenteric root lymph node metastasis: Meta-analysis.

Advanced rectal cancer with submesenteric lymph node metastasis is a common complication of advanced rectal cancer, which has an important impact on the treatment and prognosis of patients. To investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) root lymph node metastases in patients with rectal cancer. The findings of this study provided us with fresh medical information that assisted us in determining the appropriate treatment for these patients. Our study searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and other databases and searched the relevant studies and reports on the risk factors of IMA root lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer published in the self-built database until December 31, 2023. After data extraction, the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature, and RevMan5.3 software was used for meta-analysis and heterogeneity testing. The fixed effect modules without heterogeneity were selected to combine the effect size, and the random effect modules with heterogeneity were selected to combine the effect size. The cause of heterogeneity was found through sensitivity analysis, and the data of various risk factors were combined to obtain the final effect size, odds ratio (OR) value, and 95% confidence interval (CI). Publication bias was tested by drawing funnel plots. A total of seven literature were included in this study. By combining the OR value of logistic multivariate regression and the 95%CI of various risk factors, we concluded that the risk factors for lymph node metastasis in the IMA region of rectal cancer were as follows: Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 5 ng/mL (OR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.18-0.55, P < 0.05), tumor located above peritoneal reflexive (OR = 3.10, 95%CI: 1.78-5.42, P < 0.05), tumor size ≥ 5 cm (OR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.22-0.57, P < 0.05), pathological type (mucinous adenocarcinoma/sig-ring cell carcinoma) (OR = 0.23, 95%CI: 0.13-0.41, P < 0.05), degree of tumor differentiation (low differentiation) (OR = 0.17, 95%CI: 0.10-0.31, P < 0.05), tumor stage (T3-4 stage) (OR = 0.11, 95%CI: 0.04-0.26, P < 0.05), gender and age were not risk factors for IMA root lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer (P > 0.05). Preoperative CEA level, tumor location, tumor size, tumor pathologic type, tumor differentiation, and T stage were correlated with IMA root lymph node metastasis.

The Atlas of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery and Vein under Maximum-Intensity Projection and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction View

(1) Background: Understanding vascular patterns is crucial for minimizing bleeding and operating time in colorectal surgeries. This study aimed to develop an anatomical atlas of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and vein (IMV). (2) Methods: A total of 521 patients with left-sided colorectal cancer were included. IMA and IMV patterns were identified using maximum-intensity projection (MIP) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction techniques. The accuracy of these techniques was assessed by comparing them with surgical videos. We compared the amount of bleeding and operating time for IMA ligation across different IMA types. (3) Results: Most patients (45.7%) were classified as type I IMA, followed by type II (20.7%), type III (22.6%), and type IV (3.5%). Newly identified type V and type VI patterns were found in 6.5% and 1% of patients, respectively. Of the IMVs, 49.9% drained into the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), 38.4% drained into the splenic vein (SPV), 9.4% drained into the SMV–SPV junction, and only 2.3% drained into the first jejunal vein (J1V). Above the root of the left colic artery (LCA), 13.1% of IMVs had no branches, 50.1% had one, 30.1% had two, and 6.7% had three or more branches. Two patients had two main IMV branches, and ten had IMVs at the edge of the mesocolon with small branches. At the IMA root, 37.2% of LCAs overlapped with the IMV, with 34.0% being lateral, 16.9% distal, 8.7% medial, and both the marginal type of IMV and the persistent descending mesocolon (PDM) type represented 1.4%. MIP had an accuracy of 98.43%, and 3D reconstruction had an accuracy of 100%. Blood loss and operating time were significantly higher in the complex group compared to the simple group for IMA ligation (p &lt; 0.001). (4) Conclusions: A comprehensive anatomical atlas of the IMA and IMV was provided. Complex IMA patterns were associated with increased bleeding and operating time.

Level of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation in Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery: Analysis of Apical Lymph Node Metastasis and Recurrence

Introduction: Whether high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is optimal for treating sigmoid colon and rectal cancers is controversial. The present study aimed to compare outcomes of high and low ligation of the IMA and determine the adequate extent of IMA lymph node dissection. Methods: Subjects were 455 consecutive stage I–III colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery between 2011 and 2019. We assessed the association between the level of IMA ligation and overall survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) by propensity score matching analysis. Clinicopathological features of IMA lymph node metastasis and recurrence patterns were analyzed. Results: After propensity score matching, the low ligation group had a significantly worse prognosis than that of the high ligation group for RFS (p = 0.039). Positive IMA lymph nodes were associated with pathological T3 or T4 stage and N2 stage. IMA lymph node recurrences in the high ligation group occurred at the superior left side of the IMA root. In contrast, all recurrences in the low ligation group occurred at the left colic artery bifurcation. Conclusion: High ligation of IMA is oncologically safe. However, even with high ligation, care must be taken to ensure adequate lymph node dissection.

Preserving or peeling the inferior mesenteric arterial sheath during laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a prospective study of surgical outcomes

BackgroundWe mainly evaluated whether preserving the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) sheath to dissecting IMA root lymph nodes (also called No.253 lymph nodes) would benefit patients in terms of comparable lymph-node yield removed during operation and postoperative complications in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.MethodsThis is a prospective study included 141 rectal cancer patients who received laparoscopic radical resection during September 2018 to December 2020. All patients were randomly assigned to the preserved group (n = 71) and the peeled group (n = 70). The baseline characteristics, pathological features, intraoperative and postoperative data outcomes and complications were analyzed by independent samples t test, chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test between the 2 groups.ResultsThe baseline characteristic and pathological features had no statistical difference between the 2 groups. The preserved group had a shorter operative time (P = 0.002), a shorter lymph node dissection time (P < 0.001), less intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.004), an earlier time to first flatus (P = 0.013), an earlier time to fluid intake (P = 0.033) and a shorter length of hospitalization (P = 0.012) than the peeled group. The differences between the 2 groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) in regard to the total number of lymph nodes cleared, positive lymph nodes, bleeding, anastomotic leakage, pneumonia, wound infection, abscess, ileus, urinary retention, urinary tract infection and chyle leakage.ConclusionPreserving of the IMA sheath in laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer will reduce the total operation time and the length of hospitalization. This surgical method could lead to lower complication rate and faster recovery.Trial registrationThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College and registered by the China Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2200060830, Date of Registration:2022-06-12 -retrospective registration) http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Preservation of left colic artery in laparoscopic colorectal operation: The benefit challenge

During laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, there is controversy regarding whether the left colic artery (LCA) should be preserved at its origin.To investigate the prognostic significance of preservation of the LCA in colorectal cancer surgery.Patients were divided into two groups. The high ligation (H-L) technique (refers to ligation performed 1 cm from the beginning of the inferior mesenteric artery) group consisted of 46 patients, and the low ligation (L-L) technique (refers to ligation performed below the initiation of the LCA) group consisted of 148 patients. Operative time, blood loss, lymph nodes with tumor invasion, postoperative complications and recovery time, recurrence rate, and 5-year survival rate were compared between the two groups.The average number of lymph nodes detected in postoperative pathological specimens was 17.4/person in the H-L group and 15.9/person in the L-L group. There were 20 patients (43%) with positive lymph nodes (lymph node metastasis) in the H-L group and 60 patients (41%) in the L-L group. No statistical differences were found between the groups. Complications occurred in 12 cases (26%) in the H-L group and in 26 cases (18%) in the L-L group. The incidences of postoperative anastomotic complications and functional urinary complications were significantly lower in the L-L group. The 5-year survival rates in H-L and L-L groups were 81.7% and 81.6%, respectively, and relapse-free survival rates were 74.3% and 77.1%, respectively. The two groups were similar statistically.Complete mesenteric resection combined with lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery root while preserving the LCA is a beneficial surgical approach during laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Short- and long-term outcomes of preservation versus ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection for descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic D3 lymph node (LN) dissection between ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (LIMA) and preservation of the IMA (PIMA) for descending colon cancer using propensity score-matched analysis. This retrospective study included 101 patients with stage I-III descending colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic D3 LN dissection with LIMA (n = 60) or PIMA (n = 41) at a single center between January 2005 and March 2022. After propensity score matching, 64 patients (LIMA, n = 32; PIMA, n = 32) were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was the long-term outcomes, and the secondary endpoint was the surgical outcomes. In the matched cohort, no significant difference was noted in the surgical outcomes, including the operative time, estimated blood loss, number of harvested LNs, number of harvested LN 253, and complication rate. The long-term outcomes were also not significantly different between the LIMA and PIMA groups (3-year recurrence-free survival, 72.2% vs. 75.6%, P = 0.862; 5-year overall survival, 69.8% vs. 63.4%, P = 0.888; 5-year cancer-specific survival, 84.2% vs. 82.8%, P = 0.607). No recurrence of LN metastasis was observed around the IMA root. Laparoscopic D3 dissection in PIMA was comparable to that in LIMA regarding both short- and long-term outcomes. The optimal LN dissection for descending colon cancer should be investigated in future large-scale studies.

A study on spinal level, length, and branch type of the inferior mesenteric artery and the position relationship between the inferior mesenteric artery, left colic artery, and inferior mesenteric vein

BackgroundThis study was aimed to explore the clinical application of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) monoenergetic plus (mono+) imaging to evaluate anatomical variations in the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).MethodsThe clinical and imaging data of 212 patients who had undergone total abdominal DECT were retrospectively analyzed. The post-processing mono+ technique was used to obtain 40-keV single-level images in the arterial phase. Three-dimensional reconstruction was performed to evaluate the relationship between the IMA root position and the spinal level, IMA length, and IMA branch type, as well as the position of the left colic artery (LCA) and inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) at the IMA root level.ResultsThe IMA root was located at the L3 level in 78.3% of cases and at the L2/L3 level in 3.3%. The highest vertebral level of IMA origin was L2 (4.2%), and the lowest was L4 (7.1%). The distance from the IMA root to the level of the sacral promontory was 99.58 ± 13.07 mm, which increased with the elevation of the IMA root at the spinal level. Of the patients, 53.8% demonstrated Type I IMA, 23.1% Type II, 20.7% Type III, and 2.4% Type IV. The length of the IMA varied from 13.6 to 66.0 mm. 77.3% of the IMAs belonged to Type A, the adjacent type, and 22.7% to Type B, the distant type.ConclusionDECT mono+ can preoperatively evaluate the anatomical characteristics of the IMA and the positional relationship between the LCA and IMV at the IMA root level, which would help clinicians plan individualized surgery for patients.

Anatomical observation of the left parietal peritoneum and its clinical significance in left retro-mesocolic space dissection

Objective: To investigate the anatomic characteristics of the left parietal peritoneum and its surgical implementation while dissecting in left retro-mesocolic space. Methods: A descriptive case series research methods was used. (1) surgical videos of 35 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection (complete mobilization of splenic flexure) of colorectal cancer in Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University between January 2018 and December 2018 were reviewed; (2) four specimens after radical resection of rectal cancer performing in June 2020 were prospectively enrolled and reviewed; (3) five specimens of left parietal peritoneum from 5 cadaveric abdomen (3 males and 2 females) were enrolled and reviewed as well; Tissues of 3 unseparated regions, namely the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), the medial region and the lateral region (including kidney tissue), from above the 5 cadaveric abdominal specimens were selected to perform Masson staining and histopathological examination. Results: (1) Surgical video observation: "Staggered layer phenomenon" and typical left parietal peritoneum was found in 77.1% (27/35) of patients when the left retro-mesocolic space was separated from the lateral and central approaches. The left parietal peritoneum presented as a rigid fascia barrier between the lateral and central approaches, which was a translucent dense connective tissue fascia. After the splenic flexure were completely mobilized, the left parietal peritoneum stump continued to the cephalic side. (2) Observation of 4 surgical specimens: The dorsal side of the left mesocolon specimen was studied, and the left parietal peritoneum stump edge was identified. The outside of the stump edge was the left hemicolon dorsal layer, which was continuously downward to the rectal fascia propria. (3) Cadaveric abdominal specimens: The left retro-mesocolic space was separated through lateral and central approaches, and the rigid fascia barrier, essentially the left parietal peritoneum and Gerota fascia, was encountered. Cross-section view showed that the left parietal peritoneum could be further detached from the dorsal layer of the left mesocolon from the outside, but could not be further detached from the inside out. (4) Histological examination: There was no obvious fascia structure in the IMA root region, while outside the IMA root region, the left bundle of inferior mesenteric plexus penetrating Gerota fascia was observed. There were 4 layers of fascias in the medial region, including the ventral layer of the left mesocolon, the dorsal layer of the left mesocolon, left parietal peritoneum and Gerota fascia. Small vessels were observed between the dorsal layer of the left mesocolon and the left parietal peritoneum. In lateral region, renal tissue and renal fascia were observed. Three layers of fascia structures were observed clearly under high power field, including the dorsal layer of the left mesocolon, left parietal peritoneum, and Gerota fascia. Conclusions: The left parietal peritoneum is the anatomical basis of the "staggered layer phenomenon" from the lateral or central approaches during the separation of left retro-mesocolic space. The small vessels in the dissection plane are the anatomical basis of intraoperative microbleeding, which need pre-coagulation. The central part of Gerota fascia is penetrated by the branches of the inferior mesenteric plexus, which results in a relatively dense surgical plane. Thus, during the dissection through the central approach, it is easy to involve in wrong surgical plane by deeper dissection.

High versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A prospective study of surgical and oncological outcomes.

There is controversy regarding whether the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) should be ligated at its origin from the aorta (high ligation, HL) or below the branch of the left colic artery (low ligation, LL) during surgery for rectal cancer. This prospective study randomized 95 patients with histologically proven rectal cancer (clinical stages I-III based on the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines) to undergo HL (n = 47) or LL with lymph node dissection at the root of the IMA (n = 48). Only two intraoperative adverse events were observed (two HL patients experienced anastomotic ischemia and underwent extended bowel excision and splenic flexure mobilization). The LL group had a significantly shorter time to first flatus (p < .0001). No significant differences were observed in operative time (p = .14), intraoperative blood loss (p = .21), distance from the upper margin (p = .77), distance from the lower margin (p = .35), harvested lymph nodes (p = .33), or anastomotic leakage (p = .44), 2-year overall survival (p = .97), or 2-year disease-free survival (p = .42). During laparoscopic low anterior resection, a combination of LL at the IMA and vascular root lymph node dissection may help protect the blood supply of the anastomosis, reduce postoperative complications, and enhance recovery, without compromising radical excision.

Therapeutic significance of D3 dissection for low rectal cancer: a comparison of dissections between the lateral pelvic lymph nodes and the lymph nodes along the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in a multicenter retrospective cohort study

D3 dissection is the standard treatment modality for locally advanced low rectal cancer in Japan. The benefit of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) dissection (LPLND) and lymph nodes along the root of inferior mesenteric artery (253 LN) dissection (253 LND) for low rectal cancer has often been studied separately, and few studies have investigated their benefit in the same cohort. This study aimed to clarify the therapeutic significance of dissection of the LPLN in comparison to that of dissection of the 253 LN for low rectal cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 3508 patients with treatment-naïve stage I-III low rectal cancer who underwent mesorectal excision between 1997 and 2012. They were identified from the Japanese Study Group for Postoperative Follow-Up of Colorectal Cancer database. The rates of metastasis, survival, and therapeutic value index (5-year overall survival (OS) rate multiplied by metastatic rate for lymph node metastasis) were compared between LPLN and 253 LN. The rates of LPLN metastasis and 253 LN metastasis were 17.9% and 1.5%, respectively. The 5-year OS was significantly different between patients with and without LPLN metastasis (55.0% vs 85.5%, P < 0.0001) and between patients with and without 253 LN metastasis (36.2% vs 83.3%, P < 0.0001). The therapeutic value indexes of LPLN and 253 LN were 9.85 and 0.54, respectively. LPLND may have more therapeutic value than 253 LND for patients with treatment-naïve low rectal cancer, although both the patients with LPLN metastasis and those with 253 LN metastasis remained to have poor prognosis.

Evaluation of superior rectal artery Preservation in Sigmoidectomy for sigmiod colon cancer

Background: In the conventional radical treatment of sigmoid colonic cancer, the ligation of root of inferior mesenteric artery is performed to verify harvesting of D2 and D3 lymph nodes (I.e. intermediate and central lymph node groups) and improve the surgical prognosis. IMA ligation may compromise the blood supply at site of anastomosis and risk injury of autonomic nerve plexus, so preservation of superior rectal artery (SRA) may lead to increase blood flow and decrease postoperative bowel complications. Aim of the study: evaluation of SRA preservation in open sigmoidectomy for sigmoid colon cancer as regard impact on both radicality and vascularization in the remaining rectum. Patients and Methods: In this prospective study we do open radical sigmoidectomy on (30 patients) with preservation of SRA for sigmoid colonic cancer to preserve blood supply to the anastomotic site. In the operation, we dissect the trunk of IMA and lymphatic tissue around is dissected out with the tumor. Results: Lymph nodes harvested 15.2, hospital stay average 8 days (7 d-15 d). There was one case of Post operative leak treated conservatively. There were 5 cases complicated of wound infection treated by antibiotics and daily dressings. Recurrence rate (0%), mean follow up time 18 months. Conclusion: SRA can be preserved. Although the operation time is slightly increased, but dissected out lymph nodes are comparable with IMA high ligation surgery. Preservation of the SRA seems to be associated with lowering incidence of anastomotic leakage in sigmoid colonic cancer surgery

Controversy and consideration of high and low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in radical resection of rectal cancer

Radical resection is one of the most important treatment for rectal cancer, which requires not only removal of adequate bowel and mesorectum around the tumor, but also thorough lymphadenectomy. Besides, postoperative complications are surgeons' concerns as well. According to different ways to manage inferior mesenteric artery, procedures could be divided into two groups: inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) high ligation and low ligation, which lead to various outcomes of the extent of lymph nodes dissection, survival, preservation of intestinal blood supply, incidence of anastomotic leakage, and postoperative functions including defecation function, urinary function and sexual function. Author believes that for those patients with clinical stage T1, low ligation and D2 lymph nodes dissection could be considered. However, for patients with locally advanced carcinomas (clinical stage T2+or N+), especially suspicious metastasis of lymph nodes around IMA root, high ligation and D3 lymph node dissection is suggested to ensure en bloc resection. As for those patients with high risks for compromised intestinal blood supply, preservation of left colic artery plus D3 lymph nodes dissection might be a feasible way. Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescent imaging might play a role in quality control of lymphadenectomy.

Evaluation of inferior mesenteric vessel and ureter by contrast-enhanced abdominal pelvic CT and its clinical influence on laparoscopic rectal surgery

Objective: To assess the anatomic relationship of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA)/inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) with ureter by contrast-enhanced abdominal pelvic CT, in order to provide guidance for vascular management and ureteral protection in laparoscopic rectal surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Image data of contrast-enhanced abdominal pelvic CT at Department of Medical Radiography of Peking University First Hospital in November 2018 were enrolled. Exclusion criteria: (1) previous history of abdominal or pelvic surgery; (2) scoliosis deformities; (3) missing images; (4) minors; (5) inferior mesenteric vascular disease or tumor involvement resulting in suboptimal imaging; (6) poor image quality. Finally, contrast-enhanced abdominal pelvic CT data of 249 cases were collected, including 120 males and 129 females with mean age of (60.1±13.4) years. Multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) and maximum intensity projection (MIP) were used to evaluate the anatomic relationship of IMA/IMV with ureter. IMA root location, IMA length, branch types of IMA, distance between major branches, distance between IMA/IMV and ureter at the level of root of IMA, left colic artery (LCA) root, abdominal aortic bifurcation, and sacral promontory were measured and association between IMA/IMV and ureter site was summarized. Results: The distance from IMA root to the aortic bifurcation and sacral promontory was (42.0±8.5) mm and (101.8±14.0) mm, respectively. The length of IMA was (38.5±10.7) mm. The proportion of IMA roots locating at levels of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th lumbar vertebra was 3.2% (8/249), 79.5% (198/249), and 17.3% (43/249), respectively. The higher the level of the lumbar vertebra, the longer the IMA [length of IMA originating from the 2nd, 3rd, 4th lumbar vertebra level: (42.4±10.9) mm, (39.5±10.4) mm, (33.0±10.9) mm, respectively; F=7.48, P<0.001]. In 111 cases (44.6%), LCA arose independently from IMA (type 1), and the distance between LCA and the first branch of sigmoid artery (SA) was (15.0±7.4) mm; in 56 cases (22.5%), LCA and SA had a common trunk (type 2), with a length of (11.0±8.5) mm; in 78 cases (31.3%), LCA branched with SA at the same point (type 3); LCA was absent in 4 cases (1.6%)(type 4). The length of IMA in LCA-deficient type 4 was (54.8±18.0) mm, which was longer than (38.2±10.5) mm in LCA-presence type (type 1, type 2 and type 3) and the difference was statistically significant (t=-3.11, P=0.002). The distance between the ureter and IMA was the longest at the level of IMA root [(35.7±8.1) mm], was the shortest at the level of the aortic bifurcation [(22.4±6.4) mm], and the distance between the ureter and IMA in different planes was significantly different (F=185.70, P<0.001). The distance between the ureter and IMV was the longest at the level of the sacral promontory [(21.1±9.0) mm], was the shortest at the level of LCA root [(12.0±5.7) mm], whose difference was also statistically significant (F=87.66, P<0.001). Conclusions: CT post-processing techniques including MPR and MIP can efficiently and accurately assess the branch types of IMA and anatomical relationship between IMA/IMV and ureter, and provide insights into laparoscopic rectal surgery for surgeons. IMA/IMV and ureter depart farthest at the level of IMA root. Artery first and plane second strategy in the middle approach of laparoscopic rectal surgery is considerable and feasible.

Outcomes of high versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with lymph node dissection for distal sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.

We compared the complication rates and oncologic and functional outcomes of high versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). We reviewed data retrospectively from 776 patients, divided into high and low IMA ligation groups. Low ligation was performed with lymph node dissection around the IMA root. Postoperative complications and oncologic and functional outcomes were analyzed. There were 613 patients in the high ligation group and 163 patients in the low ligation group. Most clinicopathological variables were similar. There were no significant differences in complication rates (25.1% vs. 28.8%; p = 0.336), anastomotic leakage (2.8% vs. 2.5%; p = 1.000), colonic ischemia (2.8% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.393), 5-year overall survival (79.6% vs. 81.3%; p = 0.137) or 5-year relapse-free survival (77.4% vs. 73.3%; p = 0.973) between the groups. In terms of functional outcomes, both techniques were equivalent. The International Prostate Symptom Score and Fecal Incontinence Severity Index were significantly better in the low ligation group 12months postoperatively than 3months postoperatively. The oncologic and functional outcomes, as well as postoperative complications, after low ligation of the IMA with lymph node dissection are not significantly different from those after high ligation of the IMA.

Effect of preservation of left colic artery on postoperative anastomotic leakage of patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

Objective: To evaluate the effect of preservation of left colic artery (LCA) on postoperative anastomotic leakage in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to collect data of rectal cancer patients at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Fujian Cancer Hospital from September 2014 to August 2017. Inclusion criteria: (1) age of 18 to 79 years; (2) rectal adenocarcinoma confirmed by postoperative pathology; (3) patients without preoperative serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease receiving preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy; (4) laparoscopic-assisted anterior rectal resection and distal ileostomy were performed simultaneously; (5) complete clinical data. Exclusion criteria: patients with extensive abdominal metastasis, or distant organ metastasis during operation, and combined organ resection. According to whether LCA was retained during operation, the patients were divided into two groups, then the intraoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes were compared. Moreover, univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze risk factors of postoperative anastomotic leakage. Results: A total of 125 patients were included in this study, including 56 patients in the retained LCA group and 69 patients in the non-retained LCA group. Differences in baseline data, such as gender, age, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, hemoglobin, distance between tumor and anal margin, maximum diameter of tumor, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, and ypTNM stage, between retained LCA group and non-retained LCA group were not statistically significant (all P>0.05), indicating that two groups were comparable. Meanwhile there were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total number of lymph node harvested, number of harvested lymph node at the root of inferior mesenteric artery, circumferential margin, anastomotic bleeding, or postoperative hospital stay between two groups (all P>0.05). Thirteen patients in the non-retained LCA group (18.8%) developed postoperative anastomotic leakage, including 7 cases of grade A, 5 cases of grade B and 1 case of grade C, while in the retained LCA group, only 5.4% (3/56) of patients developed postoperative anastomotic leakage, including 1 case of grade A and 2 cases of grade B without case of grade C, whose difference was statistically significant (U=1674.500, P=0.028). Univariate analysis showed that preoperative hemoglobin <120 g/L and non-retained LCA were associated with postoperative anastomotic leakage (both P<0.05). Multivariate analysis cofirmed that preoperative hemoglobin < 120 g/L (OR=3.508, 95% CI: 1.158 to 10.628, P=0.017) and non-retained LCA (OR=4.065, 95%CI: 1.074 to 15.388, P=0.031) were independent risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage. Median follow-up time was 31 months (16 to 51 months), and no long-term complication was found. Local recurrence and distant metastasis were found in 1 case (1.8%) and 7 case (12.5%) in the retained LCA group, while those were found in 2 cases (2.9%) and 5 cases (7.2%) respectively, in the non-retained LCA group, whose differences were not statistically significant (P=1.000, P=0.321 respectively). Conclusion: Preservation of left colic artery not only can ensure radical lymph node dissection efficacy under the condition of similar operation time and blood loss, but also can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage for rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy.

Clinical effects of laparoscopic left colic artery-preserving total mesorectal excison for middle-low rectal cancer

Objective To investigate the clinical effects of laparoscopic left colic artery (LCA) preserving total mesorectal excision (TME) for middle-low rectal cancer. Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 339 patients with middle-low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic TME in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July 2016 to July 2017 were collected. There were 216 males and 123 females, aged from 35 to 89 years, with an average age of 62 years. No lymph node enlargement was detected at the root of inferior mesenteric artery as evaluated by preoperative examination. Of the 339 patients, 173 undergoing laparoscopic TME with preservation of LCA and 166 without preservation of LCA were allocated into observation group and control group, respectively. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative situations; (3) follow-up. Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect complications and survival of patients after hospital discharge up to August 2018. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range), and comparison between groups was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Count data were represented as absolute number or percentage, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact propability. Comparisons of ordinal data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. Results (1) Surgical situations: 339 patients underwent laparoscopic TME successfully, without conversion to open surgery or death. The operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss and number of lymph nodes dissected at the root of inferior mesenteric artery were (77±15)minutes, (32±22)mL and 3.5±1.3 in the observation group, (74±16)minutes, (30±21)mL and 3.6±1.3 in the control group, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=1.730, 0.790, -0.378, P>0.05). There were 21 and 37 patients receiving preventive stoma in the observation group and control group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2=6.154, P 0.05). Cases with anastomotic hemorrhage and time to first anal sufflation were 18 and (2.2±0.9)days in the observation group, 10 and (2.4±1.0)days in the control group, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2=2.145, t=-1.370, P>0.05). (3) Follow-up: 339 patients were followed up for 13-22 months, with a median time of 14 months. During the follow-up, 2 patients had postoperative intestinal obstruction, 19 had tumor recurrence or metastasis, and 4 died in the observation group. In the control group, 1 patient had postoperative intestinal obstruction, 17 had tumor recurrence or metastasis, and 3 died. The other patients in the two groups survived well. Conclusion Laparoscopic TME with preservation of LCA can reduce incidence of anastomotic leakage in patients with middle-low rectal cancer who don′t undergo preventive stoma. Key words: Rectal neoplasms; Rectal cancer; Left colic artery; Anastomotic leakage; Laparoscopy

Application value of the clearance of No.253 lymph nodes with priority to fascial space and preserving left colic artery in laparoscopic radical proctectomy

To investigate the application value of the clearance of No.253 lymph nodes with priority to fascial space and preserving left colic artery (LCA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical proctectomy. From August 2015 to August 2016, 97 consecutive middle-low rectal cancer patients underwent laparoscopic radical proctectomy using the clearance of No.253 lymph nodes with priority to fascial space and preserving LCA at Department of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital. Among 97 patients, 45 were females , 52 were males, mean age was (64.3±5.5) years and mean BMI was (22.4±1.8) kg/m2. Brief steps of this clearance: traditional medial approach was the commencement of the dissection at the membrane bridge line in front of iliac vascular bifurcation, then entering into the Toldt's space; superior rectal artery served as the top of the tent and the Toldt's space was extended as far as possible; blunt separation was developed caudally (reaching 2 cm below the sacral promontory), cephalad (reaching the lower part of the pancreas), left laterally (reaching Toldt's line), dextrally (reaching abdominal aorta); after giving priority to fascias space, from the root of inferior mesenteric artery, LCA was exposed and No.253 lymph nodes were dissected. This regimen was suitable for the rectal adenocarcinoma patients without distant metastasis. There was no tension in the intestine and mesenteria after anastomosis in all the 97 patients. One patient received LCA ligation during the clearance, because of thinner LCA resulting in bleeding. The other 96 cases completed the clearance and operation successfully. The mean No.253 lymphadenectomy time was 11-27(17.1±5.3) minutes. The mean number of harvested No.253 lymph node was 0-6(4±2). The No.253 lymph nodes of 6 patients were positive. No.253 regional mesentery was complete in 95 patients. The total harvested number of lymph node was 11-26(17.3±5.3). Six patients with positive lymph nodes aged from 68 to 72 years old and all of them underwent TME operation 6-8 weeks after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The mean operative time was 89-189(125±35) minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was 10.5-38.6(22.4±10.5) ml. The first exhaust time was 3.0-6.0(5.6±2.1) days. The mean time to extracting the drainage tube was 3.0-5.0(4.5±2.5) days. Anastomotic fistula appeared in 1 case and hemorrhage appeared in 1 case, and these 2 cases were cured by conservative treatment. No perioperative death occurred. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.0-10.0(3.6±2.6) days. The clearance of No.253 lymph nodes with priority to fascial space and preserving LCA in laparoscopic radical proctectomy is safe and feasible.

Laparoscopic radical treatment with preservation of left colon artery and superior rectal artery for sigmoid colon cancer

During the classical radical treatment for sigmoid colon cancer, ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) at its root is typically performed to achieve better dissection of central and intermediate lymph node groups and improve the surgical outcomes. However, the blood supply to the left colon artery (LCA), sigmoid artery, and superior rectal artery (SRA) is blocked after the ligation at the root of the IMA. Here, we report laparoscopic radical treatment with preservation of the LCA and SRA for sigmoid colon cancer to preservation of blood supply to the anastomosis. The method was indicated to treat cancer at the middle portion of sigmoid colon. In the operation, we careful dissection of IMA exposes the trunk of IMA. The surrounding lymphatic tissue is dissected from the IMA root to its distal end. The LCA is preserved. After IMA divides LCA, 2–5 sigmoid colon arteries are transected one after another at the distal end of the LCA until it further divides into left and right rectal arteries before entering the lateral wall of rectum. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is transected at the lower edge of the pancreas, and the mesorectum is cut open towards the spleen curvature at the lower edge of the pancreas. Other procedures are similar with IMA high ligation surgery. Generally, LCA and SRA can be successfully preserved, and if necessary, the colonic splenic flexure should be mobilized to ensure that there is no tension at the anastomosis. The operation doesn’t significantly prolonged operation, but retrieved comparable lymph node counts with IMA high ligation surgery. Dissection of the lymphoadipose tissues at the root of IMA with the preservation of LCA and SRA is an easily performed surgery. It guarantees further prospective clinical research to compare the anastomosis leakage and oncological outcome with IMA high ligation surgery.

Laparoscopic radical treatment with preservation of left colon artery and superior rectal artery for sigmoid colon cancer

: During the classical radical treatment for sigmoid colon cancer, ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) at its root is typically performed to achieve better dissection of central and intermediate lymph node groups and improve the surgical outcomes. However, the blood supply to the left colon artery (LCA), sigmoid artery, and superior rectal artery (SRA) is blocked after the ligation at the root of the IMA. Here, we report laparoscopic radical treatment with preservation of the LCA and SRA for sigmoid colon cancer to preservation of blood supply to the anastomosis. The method was indicated to treat cancer at the middle portion of sigmoid colon. In the operation, we careful dissection of IMA exposes the trunk of IMA. The surrounding lymphatic tissue is dissected from the IMA root to its distal end. The LCA is preserved. After IMA divides LCA, 2–5 sigmoid colon arteries are transected one after another at the distal end of the LCA until it further divides into left and right rectal arteries before entering the lateral wall of rectum. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is transected at the lower edge of the pancreas, and the mesorectum is cut open towards the spleen curvature at the lower edge of the pancreas. Other procedures are similar with IMA high ligation surgery. Generally, LCA and SRA can be successfully preserved, and if necessary, the colonic splenic flexure should be mobilized to ensure that there is no tension at the anastomosis. The operation doesn’t significantly prolonged operation, but retrieved comparable lymph node counts with IMA high ligation surgery. Dissection of the lymphoadipose tissues at the root of IMA with the preservation of LCA and SRA is an easily performed surgery. It guarantees further prospective clinical research to compare the anastomosis leakage and oncological outcome with IMA high ligation surgery.

Preservation versus non-preservation of left colic artery in sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the oncological, intraoperative and safety outcomes in sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery with and without preservation of the left colic artery (LCA). MethodWe searched Medline, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and PubMed databases for relevant articles published between 1962 and 2017. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials were identified and included in the study. End-points evaluated included 5-year mortality, number of patients with retrieved positive metastatic lymph nodes (LN) at the root of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), number of retrieved LNs, morbidity, mortality, recurrence, bowel obstruction, intraoperative blood loss, anastomotic leakage, operation time, surgical site infection and postoperative bleed. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to analyze dichotomous data. ResultsSeventeen studies including 6247 patients were identified for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that preserving the LCA was associated with reduced anastomotic leakage rate (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62–0.98; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the 5-year mortality, number of retrieved LNs, number of patients with retrieved positive metastatic LNs at the root of IMA, morbidity, mortality, recurrence, bowel obstruction, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, surgical site infection and postoperative bleed. ConclusionIn comparison with ligating the left colic artery, preserving the left colic artery seems to achieve comparable success with acceptable safety outcomes and we suggest to preserve the LCA in the sigmoid and rectal cancer surgeries. However, more multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of preserving the left colic artery in surgeries.