Role Of Receptor Phosphorylation Research Articles

LPA3 Receptor Phosphorylation Sites: Roles in Signaling and Internalization.

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) type 3 (LPA3) receptor mutants were generated in which the sites detected phosphorylated were substituted by non-phosphorylatable amino acids. Substitutions were made in the intracellular loop 3 (IL3 mutant), the carboxyl terminus (Ctail), and both domains (IL3/Ctail). The wild-type (WT) receptor and the mutants were expressed in T-REx HEK293 cells, and the consequences of the substitutions were analyzed employing different functional parameters. Agonist- and LPA-mediated receptor phosphorylation was diminished in the IL3 and Ctail mutants and essentially abolished in the IL3/Ctail mutant, confirming that the main phosphorylation sites are present in both domains and their role in receptor phosphorylation eliminated by substitution and distributed in both domains. The WT and mutant receptors increased intracellular calcium and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation in response to LPA and PMA. The agonist, Ki16425, diminished baseline intracellular calcium, which suggests some receptor endogenous activity. Similarly, baseline ERK1/2 phosphorylation was diminished by Ki16425. An increase in baseline ERK phosphorylation was detected in the IL3/Ctail mutant. LPA and PMA-induced receptor interaction with β-arrestin 2 and LPA3 internalization were severely diminished in cells expressing the mutants. Mutant-expressing cells also exhibit increased baseline proliferation and response to different stimuli, which were inhibited by the antagonist Ki16425, suggesting a role of LPA receptors in this process. Migration in response to different attractants was markedly increased in the Ctail mutant, which the Ki16425 antagonist also attenuated. Our data experimentally show that receptor phosphorylation in the distinct domains is relevant for LPA3 receptor function.

Roles of Receptor Phosphorylation and Rab Proteins in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function and Trafficking.

The G protein-coupled receptors form the most abundant family of membrane proteins and are crucial physiologic players in the homeostatic equilibrium, which we define as health. They also participate in the pathogenesis of many diseases and are frequent targets of therapeutic intervention. Considering their importance, it is not surprising that different mechanisms regulate their function, including desensitization, resensitization, internalization, recycling to the plasma membrane, and degradation. These processes are modulated in a highly coordinated and specific way by protein kinases and phosphatases, ubiquitin ligases, protein adaptors, interaction with multifunctional complexes, molecular motors, phospholipid metabolism, and membrane distribution. This review describes significant advances in the study of the regulation of these receptors by phosphorylation and endosomal traffic (where signaling can take place); we revisited the bar code hypothesis and include two additional observations: 1) that different phosphorylation patterns seem to be associated with internalization and endosome sorting for recycling or degradation, and 2) that, surprisingly, phosphorylation of some G protein-coupled receptors appears to be required for proper receptor insertion into the plasma membrane. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: G protein-coupled receptor phosphorylation is an early event in desensitization/signaling switching, endosomal traffic, and internalization. These events seem crucial for receptor responsiveness, cellular localization, and fate (recycling/degradation) with important pharmacological/therapeutic implications. Phosphorylation sites vary depending on the cells in which they are expressed and on the stimulus that leads to such covalent modification. Surprisingly, evidence suggests that phosphorylation also seems to be required for proper insertion into the plasma membrane for some receptors.

Distinct phosphorylation sites/clusters in the carboxyl terminus regulate α1D-adrenergic receptor subcellular localization and signaling

The human α1D-adrenergic receptor is a seven transmembrane-domain protein that mediates many of the physiological actions of adrenaline and noradrenaline and participates in the development of hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia. We recently reported that different phosphorylation patterns control α1D-adrenergic receptor desensitization. However, to our knowledge, there is no data regarding the role(s) of this receptor's specific phosphorylation residues in its subcellular localization and signaling. In order to address this issue, we mutated the identified phosphorylated residues located on the third intracellular loop and carboxyl tail. In this way, we experimentally confirmed α1D-AR phosphorylation sites and identified, in the carboxyl tail, two groups of residues in close proximity to each other, as well as two individual residues in the proximal (T442) and distal (S543) regions. Our results indicate that phosphorylation of the distal cluster (T507, S515, S516 and S518) favors α1D-AR localization at the plasma membrane, i. e., substitution of these residues for non-phosphorylatable amino acids results in the intracellular localization of the receptors, whereas phospho-mimetic substitution allows plasma membrane localization. Moreover, we found that T442 phosphorylation is necessary for agonist- and phorbol ester-induced receptor colocalization with β-arrestins. Additionally, we observed that substitution of intracellular loop 3 phosphorylation sites for non-phosphorylatable amino acids resulted in sustained ERK1/2 activation; additional mutations in the phosphorylated residues in the carboxyl tail did not alter this pattern. In contrast, mobilization of intracellular calcium and receptor internalization appear to be controlled by the phosphorylation of both third-intracellular-loop and carboxyl terminus-domain residues. In summary, our data indicate that a) both the phosphorylation sites present in the third intracellular loop and in the carboxyl terminus participate in triggering calcium signaling and in turning-off α1D-AR-induced ERK activation; b) phosphorylation of the distal cluster appears to play a role in receptor's plasma membrane localization; and c) T442 appears to play a critical role in receptor phosphorylation and receptor-β-arrestin colocalization.

Fast Modulation of μ-Opioid Receptor (MOR) Recycling Is Mediated by Receptor Agonists

The μ-opioid receptor (MOR) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family and the main target of endogenous opioid neuropeptides and morphine. Upon activation by ligands, MORs are rapidly internalized via clathrin-coated pits in heterologous cells and dissociated striatal neurons. After initial endocytosis, resensitized receptors recycle back to the cell surface by vesicular delivery for subsequent cycles of activation. MOR trafficking has been linked to opioid tolerance after acute exposure to agonist, but it is also involved in the resensitization process. Several studies describe the regulation and mechanism of MOR endocytosis, but little is known about the recycling of resensitized receptors to the cell surface. To study this process, we induced internalization of MOR with [D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4), Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) and morphine and imaged in real time single vesicles recycling receptors to the cell surface. We determined single vesicle recycling kinetics and the number of receptors contained in them. Then we demonstrated that rapid vesicular delivery of recycling MORs to the cell surface was mediated by the actin-microtubule cytoskeleton. Recycling was also dependent on Rab4, Rab11, and the Ca(2+)-sensitive motor protein myosin Vb. Finally, we showed that recycling is acutely modulated by the presence of agonists and the levels of cAMP. Our work identifies a novel trafficking mechanism that increases the number of cell surface MORs during acute agonist exposure, effectively reducing the development of opioid tolerance.

Disruption of parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptor phosphorylation prolongs ERK1/2 MAPK activation and enhances c-fosexpression

Previous studies have demonstrated that parathyroid hormone (PTH) binding to the PTH/PTH-related peptide receptor (PPR) stimulates G protein coupling, receptor phosphorylation, β-arrestin translocation, and internalization of the ligand/receptor complex. The extracellular signal-regulated mitogen-activated protein kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2 MAPK) are downstream effectors of PPR. In the current study, we investigated the role of PPR phosphorylation in the PTH regulation of the ERK1/2 MAPK pathway. Short treatment with PTH (0-40 min) of LLCP-K(1) cells stably expressing a wild-type (WT) or a phosphorylation-deficient (PD) PPR (WT-PPR or PD-PPR cells, respectively) results in similar activation of ERK1/2. Interestingly, PTH stimulation of ERK1/2 in the WT-PPR cells then decreases as a result of longer PTH (60 min) treatment, and inhibition of ERK1/2 by PTH is observed at 90 min. Strikingly, the PD-PPR cells exhibit prolonged ERK1/2 activation up to 90 min of PTH treatment. An ERK1/2-dependent increase in c-fos expression is observed in the PD-PPR cells. Subsequently, c-fos expression in the WT-PPR and PD-PPR cells was markedly attenuated by a specific ERK1/2 pathway inhibitor. Further investigations revealed that PTH treatment causes a robust recruitment of a green fluorescent protein-tagged β-arrestin2 (β-arrestin2-GFP) in the WT-PPR cells. In contrast, β-arrestin2 recruitment was reduced in the PD-PPR cells. Importantly, expression of a receptor phosphorylation-independent β-arrestin2 (R169E) in the PD-PPR cells restored the biphasic effect of PTH on ERK1/2 as in the WT-PPR cells. The study reports a novel role for receptor phosphorylation and β-arrestin2 in the subsequent inhibition of the ERK1/2 pathway and in control of gene expression.

The M 3 -muscarinic receptor regulates learning and memory in a receptor phosphorylation/arrestin-dependent manner

Degeneration of the cholinergic system is considered to be the underlying pathology that results in the cognitive deficit in Alzheimer's disease. This pathology is thought to be linked to a loss of signaling through the cholinergic M(1)-muscarinic receptor subtype. However, recent studies have cast doubt on whether this is the primary receptor mediating cholinergic-hippocampal learning and memory. The current study offers an alternative mechanism involving the M(3)-muscarinic receptor that is expressed in numerous brain regions including the hippocampus. We demonstrate here that M(3)-muscarinic receptor knockout mice show a deficit in fear conditioning learning and memory. The mechanism used by the M(3)-muscarinic receptor in this process involves receptor phosphorylation because a knockin mouse strain expressing a phosphorylation-deficient receptor mutant also shows a deficit in fear conditioning. Consistent with a role for receptor phosphorylation, we demonstrate that the M(3)-muscarinic receptor is phosphorylated in the hippocampus following agonist treatment and following fear conditioning training. Importantly, the phosphorylation-deficient M(3)-muscarinic receptor was coupled normally to G(q/11)-signaling but was uncoupled from phosphorylation-dependent processes such as receptor internalization and arrestin recruitment. It can, therefore, be concluded that M(3)-muscarinic receptor-dependent learning and memory depends, at least in part, on receptor phosphorylation/arrestin signaling. This study opens the potential for biased M(3)-muscarinic receptor ligands that direct phosphorylation/arrestin-dependent (non-G protein) signaling as being beneficial in cognitive disorders.

Morphine-induced μ-opioid receptor rapid desensitization is independent of receptor phosphorylation and β-arrestins

Receptor desensitization involving receptor phosphorylation and subsequent βArrestin (βArr) recruitment has been implicated in the tolerance development mediated by μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1). However, the roles of receptor phosphorylation and βArr on morphine-induced OPRM1 desensitization remain to be demonstrated. Using OPRM1-induced intracellular Ca 2+ ([Ca 2+] i )release to monitor receptor activation, as predicted, [D-Ala 2, N-Me-Phe 4, Gly 5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO), induced OPRM1 desensitization in a receptor phosphorylation- and βArr-dependent manner. The DAMGO-induced OPRM1 desensitization was attenuated significantly when phosphorylation deficient OPRM1 mutants or Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast (MEF) cells from βArr1 and 2 knockout mice were used in the studies. Specifically, DAMGO-induced desensitization was blunted in HEK293 cells expressing the OPRM1S375A mutant and was eliminated in MEF cells isolated from βArr2 knockout mice expressing the wild type OPRM1. However, although morphine also could induce a rapid desensitization on [Ca 2+] i release to a greater extent than that of DAMGO and could induce the phosphorylation of Ser 375 residue, morphine-induced desensitization was not influenced by mutating the phosphorylation sites or in MEF cells lacking βArr1 and 2. Hence, morphine could induce OPRM1 desensitization via pathway independent of βArr, thus suggesting the in vivo tolerance development to morphine can occur in the absence of βArr.

Role of epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation in α 1B-adrenoceptor phosphorylation

Phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors is one of the earliest events that regulate their function. Current evidence indicates that homologous desensitization of these receptors mainly involves G protein-coupled receptor kinases whereas in heterologous desensitization second messenger-activated kinases play key roles. Recent data show that transactivation of EGF (epidermal growth factor) receptors may also play a role in receptor phosphorylation. The role of this process was studied for the α 1B-adrenoceptor phosphorylation induced by agents acting through different processes using inhibitors to block the EGF receptor transactivation process at different levels. Experiments were performed using transfected rat-1 fibroblasts that express α 1B-adrenoceptors in a stably fashion. A metalloproteinase inhibitor, an anti-heparin-binding-EGF-selective antibody, and a selective EGF-receptor kinase inhibitor blocked the α 1B-adrenoceptor phosphorylation induced by noradrenaline or endothelin-1. Our results indicate that shedding of heparin-binding-EGF, transactivation of EGF receptors plays a more general role in α 1B-adrenoceptor phosphorylation than previously anticipated. It is possible that other receptors/channels could be modulated through a similar pathway.

Agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of the P2Y2 nucleotide receptor

Purification of HA-tagged P2Y2 receptors from transfected human 1321N1 astrocytoma cells yielded a protein with a molecular size determined by SDS-PAGE to be in the range of 57-76 kDa, which is typical of membrane glycoproteins with heterogeneous complex glycosylation. The protein phosphatase inhibitor, okadaic acid, attenuated the recovery of receptor activity from the agonist-induced desensitized state, suggesting a role for P2Y2 receptor phosphorylation in desensitization. Isolation of HA-tagged P2Y2 nucleotide receptors from metabolically [32P]-labelled cells indicated a (3.8 +/- 0.2)-fold increase in the [32P]-content of the receptor after 15 min of treatment with 100 microM UTP, as compared to immunoprecipitated receptors from untreated control cells. Receptor sequestration studies indicated that approximately 40% of the surface receptors were internalized after a 15-min stimulation with 100 microM UTP. Point mutation of three potential GRK and PKC phosphorylation sites in the third intracellular loop and C-terminal tail of the P2Y2 receptor (namely, S243A, T344A, and S356A) extinguished agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation, caused a marked reduction in the efficacy of UTP to desensitize P2Y2 receptor signalling to intracellular calcium mobilization, and impaired agonist-induced receptor internalization. Activation of PKC isoforms with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate that caused heterologous receptor desensitization did not increase the level of P2Y2 receptor phosphorylation. Our results indicate a role for receptor phosphorylation by phorbol-insensitive protein kinases in agonist-induced desensitization of the P2Y2 nucleotide receptor.

G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Negatively Regulates Chemokine Signaling at a Level Downstream from G Protein Subunits

The G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) phosphorylates and desensitizes ligand-activated G protein-coupled-receptors. Here, evidence is shown for a novel role of GRK2 in regulating chemokine-mediated signals. The presence of increased levels of GRK2 in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells produced a significant reduction of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) response to CCL2. This effect is independent of its role in receptor phosphorylation because the kinase-deficient mutant GRK2K220R was able to reduce this response, and ERK activation by CCR2BIX, a phosphorylation-defective receptor mutant, was also inhibited by GRK2. Constructs containing the Galpha(q)-binding RGS-like RH domain of GRK2 or its Gbetagamma-binding domain could not reproduce the inhibition, thus revealing that GRK2 acts downstream of G proteins. Interestingly, chemokine-driven mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) stimulation is not affected in cells overexpressing GRK2 or GRK2K220R or in splenocytes from heterozygous GRK2 mice, where reduced kinase levels correlate with enhanced ERK activation by chemokines. We find GRK2 and MEK in the same multimolecular complex, thus suggesting a mechanism for GRK2 regulation of ERK activity that involves a direct or coordinate interaction with MEK. These results suggest an important role for GRK2 in the control of chemokine induction of ERK activation at the level of the MEK-ERK interface.

Calmodulin Interacts with the Third Intracellular Loop of the Serotonin 5-Hydroxytryptamine1A Receptor at Two Distinct Sites: PUTATIVE ROLE IN RECEPTOR PHOSPHORYLATION BY PROTEIN KINASE C

The serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptor couples to heterotrimeric G proteins and intracellular second messengers, yet no studies have investigated the possible role of additional receptor-interacting proteins in 5-HT(1A) receptor signaling. We have found that the ubiquitous Ca(2+)-sensor calmodulin (CaM) co-immunoprecipitates with the 5-HT(1A) receptor in Chinese hamster ovary fibroblasts. The human 5-HT(1A) receptor contains two putative CaM binding motifs, located in the N- and C-terminal juxtamembrane regions of the third intracellular loop of the receptor. Peptides encompassing both the N-terminal (i3N) and C-terminal (i3C) CaM-binding domains were tested for CaM binding. Using in vitro binding assays in combination with gel shift analysis, we demonstrated Ca(2+)-dependent formation of complexes between CaM and both peptides. We determined kinetic data using a combination of BIAcore surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and dansyl-CaM fluorescence. SPR analysis gave an apparent K(D) of approximately 110 nm for the i3N peptide and approximately 700 nm for the i3C peptide. Both peptides also caused characteristic shifts in the fluorescence emission spectrum of dansyl-CaM, with apparent affinities of 87 +/- 23 nm and 1.70 +/- 0.16 microm. We used bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to show that CaM interacts with the 5-HT(1A) receptor in living cells, representing the first in vivo evidence of a G protein-coupled receptor interacting with CaM. Finally, we showed that CaM binding and phosphorylation of the 5-HT(1A) receptor i3 loop peptides by protein kinase C are antagonistic in vitro, suggesting a possible role for CaM in the regulation of 5-HT(1A) receptor phosphorylation and desensitization. These data suggest that the 5-HT(1A) receptor contains high and moderate affinity CaM binding regions that may play important roles in receptor signaling and function.

The Role of Phosphorylation in D1 Dopamine Receptor Desensitization: EVIDENCE FOR A NOVEL MECHANISM OF ARRESTIN ASSOCIATION

Homologous desensitization of D(1) dopamine receptors is thought to occur through their phosphorylation leading to arrestin association which interdicts G protein coupling. In order to identify the relevant domains of receptor phosphorylation, and to determine how this leads to arrestin association, we created a series of mutated D(1) receptor constructs. In one mutant, all of the serine/threonine residues within the 3rd cytoplasmic domain were altered (3rdTOT). A second construct was created in which only three of these serines (serines 256, 258, and 259) were mutated (3rd234). We also created four truncation mutants of the carboxyl terminus (T347, T369, T394, and T404). All of these constructs were comparable with the wild-type receptor with respect to expression and adenylyl cyclase activation. In contrast, both of the 3rd loop mutants exhibited attenuated agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation that was correlated with an impaired desensitization response. Sequential truncation of the carboxyl terminus of the receptor resulted in a sequential loss of agonist-induced phosphorylation. No phosphorylation was observed with the most severely truncated T347 mutant. Surprisingly, all of the truncated receptors exhibited normal desensitization. The ability of the receptor constructs to promote arrestin association was evaluated using arrestin-green fluorescent protein translocation assays and confocal fluorescence microscopy. The 3rd234 mutant receptor was impaired in its ability to induce arrrestin translocation, whereas the T347 mutant was comparable with wild type. Our data suggest a model in which arrestin directly associates with the activated 3rd cytoplasmic domain in an agonist-dependent fashion; however, under basal conditions, this is sterically prevented by the carboxyl terminus of the receptor. Receptor activation promotes the sequential phosphorylation of residues, first within the carboxyl terminus and then the 3rd cytoplasmic loop, thereby dissociating these domains and allowing arrestin to bind to the activated 3rd loop. Thus, the role of receptor phosphorylation is to allow access of arrestin to its receptor binding domain rather than to create an arrestin binding site per se.

Type 1 angiotensin II receptor-associated protein ARAP1 binds and recycles the receptor to the plasma membrane

The carboxyl terminus of the type 1 angiotensin II receptor (AT 1) plays an important role in receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, and internalization. The yeast two-hybrid system was employed to isolate proteins associated with the carboxyl terminal region of the AT 1A receptor. In the present study, we report the isolation of a novel protein, ARAP1, which promotes recycling of AT 1A to the plasma membrane in HEK-293 cells. ARAP1 cDNA encodes a 493-amino-acid protein and its mRNA is ubiquitously expressed in rat tissues. A complex of ARAP1 and AT 1A was observed by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting in HEK-293 cells. In the presence of ARAP1, recycled AT 1A showed a significant Ca 2+ release response to a second stimulation by Ang II 30 min after the first treatment. Immunocytochemical analysis revealed co-localization of recycled AT 1A and ARAP1 in the plasma membrane 45 min after the initial exposure to Ang II. Taken together, these results indicate a role for ARAP1 in the recycling of the AT 1 receptor to the plasma membrane with presumable concomitant recovery of receptor signal functions.

μ-Opioid Receptor Desensitization: ROLE OF RECEPTOR PHOSPHORYLATION, INTERNALIZATION, AND RESENSITIZATION

It is generally accepted that the internalization and desensitization of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) involves receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestin recruitment. However, a mutant MOR, which is truncated after the amino acid residue Ser363 (MOR363D), was found to undergo phosphorylation-independent internalization and desensitization. As expected, MOR363D, missing the putative agonist-induced phosphorylation sites, did not exhibit detectable agonist-induced phosphorylation. MOR363D underwent slower internalization as reflected in the attenuation of membrane translocation of beta-arrestin 2 when compared with wild type MOR, but the level of receptor being internalized was similar to that of wild type MOR after 4 h of etorphine treatment. Furthermore, MOR363D was observed to desensitize faster than that of wild type MOR upon agonist activation. Surface biotinylation assay demonstrated that the wild type receptors recycled back to membrane after agonist-induced internalization, which contributed to the receptor resensitization and thus partially reversed the receptor desensitization. On the contrary, MOR363D did not recycle after internalization. Hence, MOR desensitization is controlled by the receptor internalization and the recycling of internalized receptor to cell surface in an active state. Taken together, our data indicated that receptor phosphorylation is not absolutely required in the internalization, but receptor phosphorylation and subsequent beta-arrestin recruitment play important roles in the resensitization of internalized receptors.

Acidic Amino Acids Flanking Phosphorylation Sites in the M2 Muscarinic Receptor Regulate Receptor Phosphorylation, Internalization, and Interaction with Arrestins

The studies reported here address the molecular events underlying the interactions of arrestins with the M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR). In particular, we focused on the role of receptor phosphorylation in this process. Agonist-dependent phosphorylation of the M(2) mAChR can occur at clusters of serines and threonines at positions 286-290 (site P1) or 307-311 (site P2) in the third intracellular loop (Pals-Rylaarsdam, R., and Hosey, M. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14152-14158). Phosphorylation at either P1 or P2 can support agonist-dependent internalization. However, phosphorylation at P2 is required for receptor interaction with arrestins (Pals-Rylaarsdam, R., Gurevich, V. V., Lee, K. B., Ptasienski, J. A., Benovic, J. L., and Hosey, M. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 23682-26389). The present study investigated the role of acidic amino acids between P1 and P2 in regulating receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and receptor/arrestin interactions. Mutation of the acidic amino acids at positions 298-300 (site A1) and/or 304-305 (site A2) to alanines had significant effects on agonist-dependent phosphorylation. P2 was identified as the preferred site of agonist-dependent phosphorylation, and full phosphorylation at P2 required the acidic amino acids at A1 or their neutral counterparts. In contrast, phosphorylation at site P1 was dependent on site A2. In addition, sites A1 and A2 significantly affected the ability of the wild type and P1 and P2 mutant receptors to internalization and to interact with arrestin2. Substitution of asparagine and glutamine for the aspartates and glutamates at sites A1 or A2 did not influence receptor phosphorylation but did influence arrestin interaction with the receptor. We propose that the amino acids at sites A1 and A2 play important roles in agonist-dependent phosphorylation at sites P2 and P1, respectively, and also play an important role in arrestin interactions with the M(2) mAChR.

Biphasic redistribution of muscarinic receptor and the altered receptor phosphorylation and gene transcription are underlying mechanisms in the rat heart during sepsis

The purpose of this study was to investigate intracellular redistribution of muscarinic cholinergic receptor (m2AChR) and the roles of receptor phosphorylation and gene transcription as underlying mechanisms in the rat heart during different phases of sepsis. Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). The density of m2AChR in the sarcolemmal and light vesicle fractions was studied using [3H]-quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]-QNB). Phosphorylation of m2AChR was studied by labeling of the myocardial ATP pool by perfusing isolated hearts with [32P]H3PO4 followed by identification of the phosphorylated m2AChR with SDS-PAGE. The steady-state level of m2AChR mRNA was determined by RT-PCR and Southern blot analysis. Septic rat hearts exhibit an initial hypercardiodynamic (9 h after CLP, early sepsis) and a subsequent hypocardiodynamic (18 h after CLP, late sepsis) state. During early sepsis, the Bmax for [3H]-QNB binding was increased in sarcolemma (+69%) but decreased in light vesicles (-22%), whereas during late sepsis, the Bmax was decreased in sarcolemma (-20%) but increased in light vesicles (+32%). The sum of Bmax for sarcolemmal and light vesicle fractions was increased during early sepsis (+43%) but decreased during late sepsis (-14%). The phosphorylation of m2AChR was decreased during early sepsis (-73%) but increased during late sepsis (+36% to +90%). The m2AChR mRNA abundance was increased during early sepsis (+52%) but decreased during late sepsis (-28%). The m2AChR in the rat heart was externalized from light vesicles to sarcolemma (overexpression) during early sepsis but internalized from surface membranes to intracellular sites (underexpression) during late sepsis. Furthermore, changes in the receptor phosphorylation and gene transcription are responsible for the biphasic redistribution and the altered expression of m2AChR in the rat heart during the progression of sepsis.

Phosphorylation of beta-adrenergic receptor leads to its redistribution in rat heart during sepsis.

The role of receptor phosphorylation on the redistribution of beta-adrenergic receptors (beta-ARs) in rat hearts during different phases of sepsis was investigated. Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Changes in the distribution of beta-ARs in the sarcolemmal and light vesicle fractions were studied using (-)-[4,6-propyl-3H]dihydroalprenolol ([3H]DHA). Phosphorylation of beta-ARs was studied by perfusing hearts with [32P]H3PO4 followed by identification of the phosphorylated beta-ARs with immunoprecipitation using anti-beta 1-AR antibody. The results show that septic rat hearts exhibit an initial hypercardiodynamic (9 h after CLP; early sepsis) and a subsequent hypocardiodynamic (18 h after CLP; late sepsis) state. [3H]DHA binding studies show that, during early sepsis, the maximum binding capacity (Bmax) was increased by 26% in sarcolemma but was decreased by 30% in light vesicles, whereas, during late sepsis, the Bmax was decreased by 39% in sarcolemma but increased by 31% in light vesicles. These data indicate that beta-ARs in the rat heart were externalized from light vesicles to sarcolemma during early sepsis but were internalized from surface membranes to intracellular sites during late sepsis. The immunoprecipitation studies reveal that the externalization of beta-ARs during early sepsis was coupled with a concomitant decrease (-28.5 to -30.6%, P < 0.01) in the receptor phosphorylation, whereas the internalization of beta-ARs during late sepsis was accompanied by a simultaneous increase (30.3 to 33.8%, P < 0.01) in the receptor phosphorylation. Because the phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of beta 1-ARs regulate their functional coupling and may reflect their subcellular distribution, it is suggested that the increase in receptor phosphorylation seen in late sepsis leads to the receptor internalization observed in late sepsis; similarly, externalization of (dephosphorylated) receptors in early sepsis may give rise to the apparent decrease in sarcolemmal receptor phosphorylation observed during this interval.

Phosphorylation and desensitization of the pancreatic cholecystokinin-A receptor.

The eukaryotic cell uses a variety of mechanisms to protect itself from overstimulation. Among these mechanisms are processes involving the receptor, including uncoupling from G proteins and movement into cellular compartments. Here, we focus on mechanisms by which the pancreatic acinar cell protects itself from overstimulation through the cholecystokinin receptor with special emphasis on the role of receptor phosphorylation.

Role of Receptor Phosphorylation in Desensitization and Internalization of the Secretin Receptor

The secretin receptor is prototypic of a recently described family of G protein-coupled receptors. We recently demonstrated its phosphorylation in response to agonist stimulation and elimination of this covalent modification by C-terminal truncation (F. Ozcelebi et al. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 48, 818-824). Here, we explore the functional impact of receptor phosphorylation and structural determinants for desensitization by comparing receptor behavior after agonist exposure in cell lines expressing wild-type and truncated receptor. To characterize receptor internalization, a novel fluorescent full agonist, [rat secretin-27]-Gly-rhodamine, was developed, which bound specifically and with high affinity. Both receptor constructs bound secretin normally, leading to normal G protein coupling and cAMP accumulation and prompt receptor internalization. Exposure to 10 nM secretin for 5 min or 12 h prior to washing and restimulation with a full range of concentrations demonstrated absent cAMP responses in wild-type receptor-bearing cells and responses 25 to 30% of control and shifted 1 order of magnitude to the right in the truncated receptor-bearing cells. Thus, the major mechanism of desensitization was phosphorylation-independent receptor internalization. Phosphorylation was associated with a distinct process that likely represents interference with G protein coupling, manifest as a reduced rate of cAMP stimulation. Thus, dual distinct mechanisms of desensitization exist in the secretin receptor family that should help protect receptor-bearing cells from overstimulation.

Immunocytochemical analysis of hormone mediated nuclear translocation of wild type and mutant glucocorticoid receptors

We have analyzed structural and functional features of the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR) for their effects on receptor subcellular distribution. COS 1 cells transiently transfected with wild type and mutant hGR cDNAs were assessed immunocytochemically using well-characterized antipeptide antibodies to the hGR. The effect of administration of steroid hormones (and the antiglucocorticoid RU486) on receptor localization was evaluated. Unliganded wild type receptors expressed in COS 1 cells were predominately cytoplasmic. Addition of glucocorticoids or the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, RU486, resulted in complete translocation of these receptors into the nucleus whereas non-glucocorticoid steroids or dibutyryl cAMP were not effective in promoting nuclear translocation. Thus, nuclear translocation was specific for steroids capable of high affinity binding to the hGR. To elucidate the potential role of receptor domains in receptor localization, COS 1 cells transiently transfected with various receptor cDNA mutants were analyzed in a similar manner. Translocation of an hGR deletion mutant lacking the majority of the amino terminus (deletion of amino acids 77–262) was identical to the wild type receptor despite the absence of a transactivation domain. Receptors in which the DNA binding domain was either partially or totally deleted showed an impaired capacity to undergo hormone-inducible nuclear translocation. Deletion of the hinge region of the hGR (which also contains part of the nuclear localization signal, NL1) resulted in receptor localization in the cytoplasm. Mutants in the ligand binding domain exhibited two localization phenotypes, exclusively nuclear or cytoplasmic. Receptor mutants truncated after amino acid 550 were found in the nucleus in the presence and absence of hormone consistent with the existence of nuclear localization inhibitory sequences in the ligand binding domain of the receptor. However, a linker insertion mutant (at amino acid 582) which results in a receptor deficient in ligand binding did not undergo nuclear translocation indicating that nuclear localization inhibitory sequences were intact in this mutant. The role of receptor phosphorylation on hormone induced nuclear translocation was also examined. Mouse glucocorticoid receptors which contained mutations of certain hormone inducible phosphorylation sites exhibited translocation properties similar to wild type mGR indicating that these phosphorylation sites on the receptor do not play a major role in hormone inducible nuclear translocation.