Role Of Surgery In Stage Research Articles

The role of surgery in stage IV breast cancer: Clinical experiences of 62 patients

Background/Aim: The effect of surgical intervention on the quality of life and survival of patients presenting with metastatic breast cancer is a controversial issue. In this study, we aimed to reveal the survival, clinical, and pathological differences in patients with breast cancer who had metastatic disease at diagnosis and who underwent and did not undergo surgery for the primary tumor in our clinic and to evaluate the efficacy of surgical approach on the course of the disease. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the data of patients with metastatic breast cancer in our clinics between January 2000 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The study included those with primary metastatic disease. The study did not include male patients, patients with primary non-breast tumors, those who died of causes unrelated to breast cancer, those who underwent surgery for metastatic foci other than the primary tumor, and those who could not be followed up regularly for various reasons. In our study, there were two groups; those who received only systemic therapy were assigned to Group 1, while those who underwent surgical treatment for the primary tumor were assigned to Group 2. The clinicopathological and survival data of the groups were examined. Results: Surgical intervention was performed on 62 of our patients. The 4-year survival rates were higher than those who did not undergo surgery (Group 1: 59.6 [14.7%], Group 2: 83.5 [6%]). The comparison of the two groups showed a longer median survival in patients in Group 2 who underwent surgery, albeit not statistically significant (77 [11.23] months in Group 1 and 84 [18.91] months in Group 2 [P=0.16]). Conclusion: In conclusion, our study showed that surgical treatment may have positive effects on survival.

Closing the RCT Gap-A Large Meta-Analysis on the Role of Surgery in Stage I-III Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Despite clear guideline recommendations, surgery is not consistently carried out as part of multimodal therapy in stage I small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. The role of surgery in stages II and III is even more controversial. In the absence of current randomized control trials (RCT), we performed a meta-analysis comparing surgery versus non-surgical treatment in stage I to III SCLC patients. A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 1 July 2023, focusing on studies pertaining to the impact of surgery on small cell lung cancer (SCLC). These studies were evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Statistical analyses, including I² tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests, and Egger regression, were performed to assess the data. In addition, 5-year survival rates were analyzed. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA standards. Among the 6826 records identified, 10 original studies encompassing a collective cohort of 95,323 patients were incorporated into this meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was observed across the included studies, with no discernible indication of publication bias. Analysis of patient characteristics revealed no significant differences between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). The 5-year survival rates in a combined analysis of patients in stages I-III were 39.6 ± 15.3% for the 'surgery group' and 16.7 ± 12.7% for the 'non-surgery group' (p-value < 0.0001). SCLC patients in stages II and III treated outside the guideline with surgery had a significantly better 5-year survival compared to non-surgery controls (36.3 ± 20.2% vs. 20.2 ± 17.0%; p-value = 0.043). In the absence of current RCTs, this meta-analysis provides robust suggestions that surgery might significantly improve survival in all SCLC stages. Non-surgical therapy could lead to a shortening of life. The feasibility of surgery in non-metastatic SCLC should always be evaluated as part of a multimodal treatment.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC), Oncological Outcomes and Long-Term Survival among Patients with Gastric Cancer and Limited Peritoneal Disease Progression after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

The role of surgery in stage IV gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (PM) remains unclear. The objective of the current single-center study was to define the impact of gastrectomy with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on outcomes among Central European GC patients with limited peritoneal disease progression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Patients with histologically confirmed GC who underwent curative-intent multimodal treatment between 2013 and 2023 were included. Patients without adenocarcinoma, who did not undergo gastrectomy, had early (cT1) or metastatic GC at the time of initial diagnosis, who underwent multivisceral resection, incomplete cytoreduction or palliative care, died before planned curative-intent treatment, or had incomplete clinical or pathological missing information were excluded. A total of 74 patients who underwent curative-intent treatment for GC with PM were included in the final analytic cohort. Patients who underwent gastrectomy with CRS+HIPEC were less likely to achieve TOO (CRS+HIPEC: 28% vs. CRS: 57.1%, p = 0.033) compared with individuals after CRS alone. Specifically, patients who underwent gastrectomy with CRS+HIPEC had a higher likelihood of postoperative complications (CRS+HIPEC: 48% vs. CRS: 20.4%, p = 0.018) and longer hospital LOS (median, CRS+HIPEC: 12 vs. CRS: 10, p = 0.019). While administration of HIPEC did not impact long-term survival (median OS, CRS+HIPEC: 16 months vs. CRS: 12 months, p = 0.55), postoperative complications (median OS, CCI < 30:16 months vs. CCI > 30:5 months, p = 0.024) and ICU stay (median OS, no ICU stay: 16 months vs. ICU stay: 5 months, p = 0.008) were associated with worsened long-term survival among GC patients with PM. Data from the current study demonstrated a lack of survival benefit among advanced GC patients with PM undergoing gastrectomy with CRS+HIPEC when compared with individuals after gastrectomy with CRS alone. Administration of perioperative chemotherapy and achievement of TO failed to withstand the peritoneal disease progression during NAC.

The Role of Surgery in Stage I Small Cell Lung Cancer: A National VA Database Analysis

BackgroundHistorically, limited stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) has been treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). While current NCCN guidelines recommend consideration of lobectomy in node-negative cT1-T2 SCLC, data regarding the role of surgery in very limited SCLC is lacking. MethodsData from the National VA Cancer Cube were compiled. A total of 1,028 patients with pathologically confirmed stage I SCLC were studied. Only 661 patients that either received surgery or CRT were included. Interval-censored Weibull and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate median overall survival (OS) and hazard ratio (HR), respectively. Two survival curves were compared by a Wald test. Subset analysis was performed based on the location of the tumor in the upper vs. lower lobe as delineated by ICD-10 codes C34.1 and C34.3. ResultsFour-hundred and forty-six patients received concurrent CRT; while 223 underwent treatment that contained surgery (93 surgery only, 87 surgery/chemo, 39 surgery/chemo/radiation and 4 surgery/radiation). The median OS for the surgery-inclusive treatment was 3.87 years (95% CI 3.21-4.48) while median OS for the CRT cohort was 2.45 years (95% CI 2.17-2.74). HR of death for surgery-inclusive treatment when compared to CRT is 0.67 (95% CI 0.55-0.81; P < .001). Subset analysis based on the location of the tumor in both the upper or lower lobes showed improved survival with surgery as compared to CRT regardless of the location. HR for the upper lobe was 0.63 (95% CI 0.50-0.80; P < .001) and lower lobe 0.61 (95% CI 0.42-0.87; P = .006). Multivariable regression analysis accounting for age and ECOG-PS shows a HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.43-0.83; P = .002) favoring surgery. ConclusionsSurgery was used in less than a third of patients with stage I SCLC who received treatment. Surgery-inclusive multimodality treatment was associated with a longer overall survival as compared to chemoradiation, independent of age, performance status or tumor location. Our study suggests a more expansive role for surgery in stage I SCLC.

Redefining the role of surgery in early small-cell lung cancer

PurposeResection is guideline recommended in stage I small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) but not in stage II. In this stage, patients are treated with a non-surgical approach. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the role of surgery in both SCLC stages. Surgically treated patients were compared to non-surgical controls. Five-year survival rates were analysed.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed on December 01, 2021 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. Studies published since 2004 on the effect of surgery in SCLC were considered and assessed using ROBINS-I. We preformed I2-tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests and Egger-regression. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA.ResultsOut of 6826 records, we identified seven original studies with a total of 15,170 patients that met our inclusion criteria. We found heterogeneity between these studies and ruled out any publication bias. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). The 5-year survival rates in stage I were 47.4 ± 11.6% for the ‘surgery group’ and 21.7 ± 11.3% for the ‘non-surgery group’ (p-value = 0.0006). Our analysis of stage II SCLC revealed a significant survival benefit after surgery (40.2 ± 21.6% versus 21.2 ± 17.3%; p-value = 0.0474).ConclusionBased on our data, the role of surgery in stage I and II SCLC is robust, since it improves the long-term survival in both stages significantly. Hence, feasibility of surgery as a priority treatment should always be evaluated not only in stage I SCLC but also in stage II, for which guideline recommendations might have to be reassessed.

Propensity score matched analysis for the role of surgery in stage Ⅲ small cell lung cancer based on the eighth edition of the TNM classification: a population study of the US SEER database and a Chinese hospital

ObjectivePatients with very early stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) can benefit from surgery. However, the role of surgery in local advanced SCLC patients remains controversial. We designed this study to investigate the role of surgery on survival of this subset population. MethodsThe included patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER database from 1998 to 2016 and Shanghai Chest Hospital of China from 2009 to 2016. Propensity score matching(PSM) was used to balance clinical bias. The overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared by the Kaplan–Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with survival. ResultsAmong the 3005 stage Ⅲ patients, 570 (18.97%) patients underwent surgery. Compared with non-surgical group, patients undergoing surgery were more likely to be male, had smaller tumor size, mediastinal lymph node involvement and lower pathologic stage. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that surgical patients had a better OS and LCSS before and after PSM. 418 surgical patients were well matched with non-surgical patients. In matched surgical group, there were 224 (53.59%) patients who underwent lobectomy (LB), 147 (35.17%) patients who received sublobectomy (SLB), 31 (7.41%) patients who underwent pneumonectomy and 16 (3.83%) patients with unknown surgery type. The 5-year OS of the 4 subgroups were 28.80%, 12.50%, 8.70% and 13.50%, respectively (P = 0.002). In a multivariable Cox model, SLB (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95%CI, 1.20–1.96; P = 0.001) and pneumonectomy (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95%CI, 1.12–2.65; P = 0.013) were associated with worse OS compared with LB. ConclusionSurgical resection significantly improved OS and LCSS of stage Ⅲ SCLC patients in our study. Furthermore, LB had advantage over other surgery type but further exploration in larger prospective clinical trials is needed.

P06.03 The Role of Surgery for Stage 0 Adenocarcinoma in Situ of the Lung: A U.S. National Analysis

Stage 0 adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the lung is thought to be associated with ∼100% 5-year survival after resection. However, the data for AIS are largely from Asia with few data from the U.S. In addition, there is a paucity of data on long-term survival of patients with stage 0 AIS who do not undergo any type of treatment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term survival of patients who received surgery vs no treatment for Stage 0 AIS of the lung in a U.S. population.

MA12.05 Is there a Role for Surgery in Stage I Small Cell Lung Cancer? A National VA Database Analysis

Historically, limited stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) has been treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). While current NCCN guidelines recommend consideration of lobectomy in node-negative cT1-T2 SCLC, data regarding the role of surgery in very limited SCLC is lacking. To our knowledge, only one retrospective study has evaluated the role of surgery in stage I SCLC. Data from the National VA Cancer Cube were compiled. A total of 1,028 patients with pathologically confirmed Stage I SCLC were studied. Only 661 patients that either received surgery or CRT were included. Interval-censored Weibull and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate median overall survival (OS) and hazard ratio (HR), respectively. Two survival curves were compared by a Wald test. Subset analysis was performed based on the location of the tumor in the upper vs lower lobe as delineated by ICD-10 codes C34.1 and C34.3. Four-hundred and forty-two patients received concurrent CRT; while 219 underwent treatment that contained surgery (92 surgery only, 84 surgery/chemo, 39 surgery/chemo/radiation and 4 surgery/radiation). The median OS for the surgery-inclusive treatment was 3.87 years (95% CI 3.25-4.60) while median OS for the CRT cohort was 2.43 years (95% CI 2.15-2.72). HR of death for surgery-inclusive treatment when compared to CRT is 0.65 (95% CI 0.54-0.79; p<0.001). Subset analysis based on the location of the tumor in upper lobe and lower lobe showed improved survival with surgery as compared to CRT regardless of the location. HR for upper lobe was 0.61 (95% CI 0.48-0.78; p<0.001) and lower lobe 0.60 (95% CI 0.41-0.87; p=0.007). Multivariable regression analysis accounting for age and ECOG-PS shows a HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.42-0.85; p=0.004) favoring surgery. Surgery was used in less than a third of patients with stage I SCLC who received treatment. Surgery-inclusive multimodality treatment was associated with a longer overall survival as compared to chemoradiation, independent of age, performance status or tumor location. Our study suggests a more expansive role for surgery in stage I SCLC.

The role of surgery in stage I small-cell lung cancer: A national VA database analysis.

e21109 Background: Historically, limited stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) has been treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). While current NCCN guidelines recommend consideration of lobectomy in node-negative cT1-T2 SCLC, real world data regarding the role of surgery in very limited SCLC is lacking. To our knowledge, only one retrospective study has evaluated the role of surgery in stage I SCLC. Methods: Data from the National VA Cancer Cube were compiled. A total of 1,028 patients with pathologically confirmed Stage I SCLC were studied. Only 661 patients that either received surgery or CRT were included. Interval-censored Weibull and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate median overall survival (OS) and hazard ratio (HR), respectively. Two survival curves were compared by a Wald test. Subset analysis was performed based on the location of the tumor in the upper vs lower lobe as delineated by ICD-10 codes C34.1 and C34.3. Results: Four-hundred and forty-two patients received concurrent CRT; while 219 underwent treatment that contained surgery (92 surgery only, 84 surgery/chemo, 39 surgery/chemo/radiation and 4 surgery/radiation). The median OS for the surgery-inclusive treatment was 3.87 years (95% CI 3.25-4.60) while median OS for the CRT cohort was 2.43 years (95% CI 2.15-2.72). HR of death for surgery-inclusive treatment when compared to CRT was 0.65 (95% CI 0.54-0.79; p &lt; 0.001). Subset analysis based on the location of the tumor in upper lobe and lower lobe showed improved survival with surgery as compared to CRT regardless of the location. HR for upper lobe was 0.61 (95% CI 0.48-0.78; p &lt; 0.001) and lower lobe 0.60 (95% CI 0.41-0.87; p = 0.007). Multivariable regression analysis accounting for age and ECOG-PS shows a HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.42-0.85; p = 0.004) favoring surgery. Conclusions: Surgery was used in less than a third of patients with stage I SCLC who received treatment. Surgery-inclusive multimodality treatment was associated with a longer overall survival as compared to chemoradiation, independent of age, performance status or tumor location. Our study supports a more expansive role for surgery in stage I SCLC.

The role of surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in octogenarians in the era of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the Netherlands

ObjectivesResection is the standard treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in operable patients. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is recommended for inoperable patients. A shift from surgery to SBRT is expected in elderly patients due to increased frailty and competing risks. We assessed the current influence of age on treatment decision-making and overall survival (OS). Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using data from patients with clinical stage I NSCLC diagnosed in 2012–2016 and treated with lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge resection, or SBRT, retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient characteristics and OS were compared between SBRT and (sub)lobar resection for patients aged 18−79 and ≥80 years. Results and Conclusion8764 patients treated with lobectomy (n = 4648), segmentectomy (n = 122), wedge resection (n = 272), or SBRT (n = 3722) were included. In 2012–2016, SBRT was increasingly used for octogenarians and younger patients from 75.3% to 83.7% and from 30.8% to 43.2%, respectively. Five-year OS in the whole population was 70% after surgery versus 39% after SBRT and 50% versus 27% in octogenarians. After correction for age, gender, year of diagnosis, and clinical T-stage, OS was equal after lobectomy and SBRT in the first 2 years after diagnosis. However, after >2 years, OS was better after lobectomy than after SBRT.SBRT is the prevailing treatment in octogenarians with stage I NSCLC. While surgery is associated with better OS than SBRT, factors other than treatment modality (e.g. comorbidity) may have had a significant impact on survival. The wider application of SBRT in octogenarians likely reflects the frailty of this group. Registries and trials are required to identify key determinants of frailty in this specific population to improve patient selection for surgery or SBRT.

Surgery for Metastatic Melanoma: an Evolving Concept.

This review describes the evolving role of surgery in stage III and IV melanoma. Surgery has been the first option to cure melanoma patients at initial diagnosis of metastatic spread: a complete surgical excision of the disease either in stage III or IV has been the gold standard for decades. A positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been followed by a complete lymph node dissection (CLND) since the early stages of modern surgical oncology. However, since two randomized trials have indicated that a CLND does not improve survival in patients with a positive SNB, a CLND is no longer considered mandatory. A therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) is still offered to patients with macroscopic nodal disease and in highly selected cases, patients with distant melanoma metastases can be treated surgically as well. Also the availability of adjuvant, and in the future possibly neoadjuvant, systemic therapy have shifted the landscape to less extensive surgery in metastatic melanoma. With the development of new systemic options, surgery in metastatic melanoma has become more and more part of a multidisciplinary treatment: surgical indications are moving from previous standards to a new role.

ES22.02 A Milestone in Locally Advanced NSCLC

Stage III NSCLC encompasses locally advanced tumours with infiltration of locoregional nodes and central thoracic structures and accounts for about a third of newly diagnosed NSCLC[1]. It represents the most advanced stage of NSCLC in which treatment is delivered with curative intent, but eventually more than 60% of patients die from their disease. Stage III NSCLC patients must strictly be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board, whereat the definition of resectability suffers from a certain heterogeneity across centers. Resectability is usually defined by the degree of invasion of lymph nodes, most often excluding multilevel or bulky N2 and N3 disease as well as invasion of the oesophagus, aorta and myocardium. Controversy exists on the role of surgery in stage III NSCLC since two large randomized trials investigated either induction chemoradiation therapy followed by resection versus radiotherapy[2], or induction chemotherapy followed by resection versus radiotherapy[3]. Both studies failed to demonstrate a difference in survival[2-5], however these treatment strategies are evidence-based and can be pursued in restectable NSCLC[6]. In the surgical scenario, randomised trials and meta-analyses have consistently shown that either adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy added to surgery results, with a better survival than surgery alone[7,8]. Adding preoperative radiotherapy to chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC did not improve the clinical outcome in a phase 3 randomised trial[9]. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in stage IIIA/N2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery has been evaluated in a unique randomized trial with awaited results (Lung ART, NCT00410683). Early NSCLC stages offer a theoretical unique curative scenario for the development of immunotherapy strategies, with limited disease volumes, a relative immune system preservation as well as unique opportunities for the investigation and assessment of new biomarkers. Perspectives, rational, hopes and ongoing attempts to combine immunotherapy in the surgical setting or alternatively complementary to chemoradiation will be discussed, with a focus on locally advanced disease. 1. Detterbeck FC. The eighth edition TNM stage classification for lung cancer: What does it mean on main street? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;155:356-9. 2. Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VW, et al. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:379-86. 3. van Meerbeeck JP, Kramer GW, Van Schil PE, et al. Randomized controlled trial of resection versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:442-50. 4. O'Rourke N, Roque IFM, Farre Bernado N, Macbeth F. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD002140. 5. Auperin A, Le Pechoux C, Rolland E, et al. Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2181-90. 6. Postmus PE, Kerr KM, Oudkerk M, et al. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017;28:iv1-iv21. 7. Group NM-aC. Preoperative chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 2014;383:1561-71. 8. Group NM-aC, Arriagada R, Auperin A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: two meta-analyses of individual patient data. Lancet 2010;375:1267-77. 9. Pless M, Stupp R, Ris HB, et al. Induction chemoradiation in stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet 2015;386:1049-56. Stage III NSCLC , chemoradiation, neo-adjuvant immunotherapy

The role of surgery for stage I small cell lung cancer in recent years: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

e20576Background: Concurrent chemoradiation has been the standard of care in limited stage small-cell-lung cancer (L-SCLC) because of its tendency to early dissemination. In a subset of patients wi...

Pathologic complete response after induction therapy-the role of surgery in stage IIIA/B locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Pathologic complete response (pCR) is dominant prognostic factor determining favorable outcome in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after induction therapy (IT). There is no non-operative diagnostics that adequately estimates the pCR. Aim of this retrospective study was to assess the correlation between clinical and pathological factors in patients with pCR. Twenty-five patients with pCR after curative lung resection following IT were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression and descriptive analysis. The survival rate was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. The IT included chemoradiation with median doses of 50.4 Gy (range, 45-59.4 Gy) combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in 23 patients (92%) and induction platinum-based chemotherapy in 2 patients (8%). Clinical tumor stage before IT was IIIA in 21, IIIB in 4 patients. Mean interval between IT and surgery was 8.1±3.0 weeks. Perioperative morbidity and 30-day mortality was 32% and 4%, respectively. There was no significant correlation of pCR and different clinical and pathological factors. The estimated 5-year long-term survival (LTS) and progressive-free survival (PFS) was 57% and 54%, respectively. The median LTS and PFS was not reached. pCR in patients with locally advanced NSCLC following IT is an independent prognostic factor, without correlation with pathological and clinical factors. Non-operative accurate assessment of pCR is currently impossible. Surgical resection enables secure identification of pCR and might improve the patient stratification for additive therapy.

The impact of effective systemic therapies on surgery for stage IV metastatic melanoma

Background: The prognosis of metastatic melanoma has drastically improved in recent years with the evolution of effective systemic therapies (EST). The impact of EST on the role of surgery in Stage IV melanoma is unclear. We sought to characterise the patterns and outcomes of surgery in patients with Stage IV melanoma before and after the introduction of EST.

Efficacy of surgery and prophylactic cranial irradiation in stage II and III small cell lung cancer.

Background: The role of surgery for stage II and III small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains controversial. The use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for resected SCLC was limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of surgery in patients with stage II and III SCLC, and evaluate the value of PCI on resected disease.Methods: A total of 269 consecutive patients with stage II-IIIA SCLC were retrospectively reviewed from January 2010 to December 2015. Of these, 116 patients received surgical resection, and 153 underwent non-surgical treatment. Resected patients were matched 1:1 with non-surgical patients (n=70 in each group).Results: The median follow-up was 30 months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) for matched patients were 80.0%, 44.3% and 31.7% in surgical group, and 80.0%, 24.3% and 20.0% in non-surgical group (P=0.009), respectively. Multivariate analysis in matched patients showed that surgery (HR=0.603, 95%CI: 0.404-0.900) and PCI (HR=0.637, 95%CI: 0.427-0.950) were independent prognostic factors for OS. In subgroup analysis, OS benefit related to surgery was marginal for stage II (P=0.09) and IIIA patients (P=0.061), but was significant for selected stage IIIA patients who received adjuvant chemo-radiation and PCI (P=0.01). PCI was associated with improved OS for non-surgical patients (P=0.036), and stage IIIA of surgical patients (P=0.047).Conclusions: These findings suggest a potential OS benefit of surgery in stages II and IIIA patients, particularly in selected stage IIIA patients who received adjuvant chemo-radiation and PCI. The use of PCI for surgical patients with stage IIIA was associated with improved OS.

What is the role of surgery in stage III NSCLC in the era of immunotherapy?

What is the role of surgery in stage III NSCLC in the era of immunotherapy?

ED14.04 Is There a Role for Surgery in SCLC?

ED14.04 Is There a Role for Surgery in SCLC?

ED10.02 The Role of Surgery in Stage III NSCLC

ED10.02 The Role of Surgery in Stage III NSCLC

Recent randomized trials on stage III lung cancer treatment

The optimal strategy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not well-established and significant variation in practice exists across the United States and Europe (1,2). In the U.S., the majority of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) member institutions consider surgery to be indicated in stage IIIA patients with involvement of a single N2 lymph node station smaller than 3 cm who have undergone induction chemotherapy (1). However, there is no agreement among institutions regarding treatment for other manifestations of stage IIIA-N2 involvement (e.g., multi-station or bulky disease) and both NCCN and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines recommend that the role of surgery be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board setting (2,3). The lack of consensus regarding treatment strategies for stage III NSCLC is in part due to the paucity of randomized studies available to guide decision-making (4). Recently, though, there have been two randomized controlled trials published that attempt to better elucidate the role of induction therapy regimens and the role of surgery for stage III NSCLC.