Role Of Surface Potential Research Articles

The multivariate interaction between Au and TiO2 colloids: the role of surface potential, concentration, and defects.

The established DLVO theory explains colloidal stability by the electrostatic repulsion between electrical double layers. While the routinely measured zeta potential can estimate the charges of double layers, it is only an average surface property which might deviate from the local environment. Moreover, other factors such as the ionic strength and the presence of defects should also be considered. To investigate this multivariate problem, here we model the interaction between a negatively charged Au particle and a negatively charged TiO2 surface containing positive/neutral defects (e.g. surface hydroxyls) based on the finite element method, over 6000 conditions of these 6 parameters: VPart (particle potential), VSurf (surface potential), VDef (defect potential), DD (defect density), Conc (salt concentration), and R (particle radius). Using logistic regression, the relative importance of these factors is determined: VSurf > VPart > DD > Conc > R > VDef, which agrees with the conventional wisdom that the surface (and zeta) potential is indeed the most decisive descriptor for colloidal interactions, and the salt concentration is also important for charge screening. However, when defects are present, it appears that their density is more influential than their potential. To predict the fate of interactions more confidently with all the factors, we train a support vector machine (SVM) with the simulation data, which achieves 97% accuracy in determining whether adsorption is favorable on the support. The trained SVM including a graphical user interface for querying the prediction is freely available online for comparing with other materials and models. We anticipate that our model can stimulate further colloidal studies examining the importance of the local environment, while simultaneously considering multiple factors.

Role of surface potential in the catalytic action of micelles of cationic surfactants with a hydroxyalkyl fragment in the head group

The surface potential in aqueous micellar solutions of a series of cetyltrialkylammonium bromides containing a hydroxyalkyl fragment in the head group was determined with a spectral probe (p-nitrophenol). It was found that the catalytic effect exerted by these surfactants in solution on the base hydrolysis of carboxylic acid esters is determined by two factors. First, the charged nucleophile is concentrated at the micelle surface. Second, hydrogen bonding of the substrate with the hydroxyalkyl substituents results in its activation.

The 1.4 Å structure of dianthin 30 indicates a role of surface potential at the active site of type 1 ribosome inactivating proteins

The 1.4 Å structure of dianthin 30 indicates a role of surface potential at the active site of type 1 ribosome inactivating proteins

The 1.4 Å structure of dianthin 30 indicates a role of surface potential at the active site of type 1 ribosome inactivating proteins

Ribosome inactivating proteins (RIPs) are plant proteins with enzymatic activity identified as rRNA N-glycosidase (EC 3.2.2.22), which cleaves the N-glycosidic bond of a specific adenine on the ricin/sarcin region of rRNA, thus causing inhibition of protein synthesis. They also depurinate extensively DNA and other polynucleotides. The three-dimensional structure of dianthin 30, a type 1 (single-chain) RIP of Dianthus caryophyllus (leaves), is now described at 1.4 Å, a resolution never achieved before for any RIP. The fold typical of RIPs is conserved, despite some differences in the loop regions. The general structure comparison by superimposed α-carbon (249 atoms) and the sequence alignment by structure for dianthin 30 and saporin-S6 give a root mean square deviation of 0.625 Å. Despite the differences reported for the biological activities of the two RIPs, their structures fit quite well and both show a protein segment containing strands β7, β8, and β9 shorter than other RIPs. However, the surface electrostatic potential in the active site region neatly distinguishes dianthin 30 from saporin-S6. The possible relationship between the charge distribution and the behavior of the proteins toward different substrates is discussed.

Binding of a mitochondrial presequence to natural and artificial membranes: role of surface potential.

The binding of a synthetic mitochondrial presequence to large, negatively charged, unilamellar vesicles and to unenergized yeast mitochondria has been measured. The presequence, which corresponds to the amino-terminal 25 residues of the yeast cytochrome oxidase subunit IV precursor, was labeled with a fluorescent probe and used to examine the importance of the surface potentials of membranes on the interactions with the presequence. Binding of the fluorescent presequence to the membranes was determined by measuring a decrease in the fluorescence emission of the bound presequence. Binding both to the vesicles and to the mitochondria could be described as a simple partitioning of the presequence between the aqueous and lipid phases. The partitioning was found to depend on the ionic strength of the medium, and the Gouy-Chapman theory could be used to describe the partitioning at various ionic strengths. Application of the theory allowed the determination of an apparent charge on the presequence (+2.31 +/- 0.25), salt-independent apparent partition coefficients for vesicles (99 +/- 84 M-1) and for unenergized mitochondria (14.5 +/- 3.6 L g-1), and an estimated charge density for the mitochondrial outer membrane (-0.0124 +/- 0.0016 C m-2). This study shows that electrostatic effects are significant for the binding of a mitochondrial presequence both to lipid vesicles and to mitochondria, the natural target membrane of the presequence. The accumulation of positively charged presequences at the negative mitochondrial surface and the subsequent partitioning of the presequences directly into the mitochondrial outer membrane probably represent early steps in the translocation of precursor proteins into mitochondria.

A comparison of positive and negative ion static SIMS spectra of polymer surfaces

AbstractNegative ion static SIMS spectra are presented for several polymers whose positive ion spectra have been well characterized previously. The negative cluster ions present in the spectra of poly‐methyl methacrylate, poly‐hydroxy ethylmethacrylate and poly‐ethylene terephthalate provide detailed information on polymer side chain and back‐bone structure complementing and clarifying the information previously only obtainable from positive ion emission. The detection and optimization of structurally informative negative cluster ions is discussed in relation to experimental parameters and the role of surface potential.

On the surface potential in InSb with x-ray irradiation

The role of surface potential v s0 on the electrical transport properties of InSb with X-ray irradiation measurements at T = 79°K is described. Magnitude and sign of the conductivity changes under irradiation depend only on the value of the surface potential.