Role Of Operative Intervention Research Articles

Abdominal Pain and Abdominal Mass

Acute abdominal pain and abdominal mass are intimately connected; therefore, the diagnostic process for evaluating abdominal pain and abdominal masses is largely the same and has been preserved since ancient times. The primary goals in the management of patients with abdominal pain and/or abdominal mass are to establish a differential diagnosis by obtaining a clinical history, to refine the differential diagnosis with a physical examination and appropriate studies, and to determine the role of operative intervention in the treatment or refinement of the working diagnosis. This review describes the process of diagnosing abdominal pain, including taking a clinical history and performing a physical examination. Investigative studies, including laboratory tests, imaging, and pathology are reviewed. Management, including surgical treatment, is discussed. Tables describe intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal causes of acute abdominal pain, frequency of specific diagnoses in patients with acute abdominal pain, and common abdominal signs and findings noted on physical examination. Figures show abdominal pain in specific locations, a data sheet, the differential diagnosis of an abdominal mass by quadrant or region, characteristic patterns of abdominal pain, acute appendicitis with associated appendicolith, bilateral adrenal masses, adrenocortical carcinoma, retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma, pancreatic mass, a sagittal ultrasonogram of the pancreas, ultrasonograms of the liver, a dark and well circumscribed abdominal mass, gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, and percutaneous biopsy of a large abdominal mass. An algorithm outlines the assessment of acute abdominal pain and abdominal mass. This review contains 16 figures, 5 tables, and 164 references. Keywords: anatomy, swellings, inflammatory, opioid, palpatation, PET, COVID 19

Abdominal Pain and Abdominal Mass

Acute abdominal pain and abdominal mass are intimately connected; therefore, the diagnostic process for evaluating abdominal pain and abdominal masses is largely the same and has been preserved since ancient times. The primary goals in the management of patients with abdominal pain and/or abdominal mass are to establish a differential diagnosis by obtaining a clinical history, to refine the differential diagnosis with a physical examination and appropriate studies, and to determine the role of operative intervention in the treatment or refinement of the working diagnosis. This review describes the process of diagnosing abdominal pain, including taking a clinical history and performing a physical examination. Investigative studies, including laboratory tests, imaging, and pathology are reviewed. Management, including surgical treatment, is discussed. Tables describe intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal causes of acute abdominal pain, frequency of specific diagnoses in patients with acute abdominal pain, and common abdominal signs and findings noted on physical examination. Figures show abdominal pain in specific locations, a data sheet, the differential diagnosis of an abdominal mass by quadrant or region, characteristic patterns of abdominal pain, acute appendicitis with associated appendicolith, bilateral adrenal masses, adrenocortical carcinoma, retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma, pancreatic mass, a sagittal ultrasonogram of the pancreas, ultrasonograms of the liver, a dark and well circumscribed abdominal mass, gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, and percutaneous biopsy of a large abdominal mass. An algorithm outlines the assessment of acute abdominal pain and abdominal mass. This review contains 14 figures, 5 tables, and 143 references.

Managing pancreatoduodenal trauma

Pancreatoduodenal injuries are an uncommon but important source of morbidity and mortality in the trauma patient. They require a multidisciplinary approach, with a pancreatic surgeon involved at the earliest opportunity. The investigation and management of these injuries are discussed along with the role of operative intervention.

Pediatric otogenic lateral sinus thrombosis recanalization

Objective To describe the recovery outcomes in pediatric patients with otogenic lateral sinus and internal jugular vein thrombosis. Methods An inpatient database from a tertiary care pediatric hospital was queried from 1999 to 2010 for the diagnosis code [325] thrombosis of intracranial venous sinus. Demographics, extent of thrombosis, surgical intervention, use of anticoagulation, and the presence of recanalization on follow-up imaging was collected. Results Fifteen patients (10 male, 5 female) were identified with otogenic lateral sinus thrombosis. Eleven patients (73.3%) had evidence of thrombus in the transverse sinus, while 10 patients (66.7%) had thrombus in the internal jugular vein, and one patient (6.7%) had thrombus in the cavernous sinus. Five patients (33%) had otitic hydrocephalus. Twelve patients (80%) underwent operative manipulation of the lateral sinus including: three decompressions 20%, three needle aspirations 20%, and six venotomies with evacuation of clot or pus 40%. Twelve patients were anticoagulated with low molecular weight heparin, and three patients were not anticoagulated. Ten of fourteen patients (71.4%) who underwent follow-up magnetic resonance venography had evidence of partial (57.1%) or complete (14.3%) recanalization of the lateral sinus. All five patients with otitic hydrocephalus recovered as determined by a normal fundoscopic exam and recovery of abducens paresis. Conclusion Recanalization of the lateral intracranial venous sinus occurred in the majority of the patients in this series. The role of operative intervention and/or anticoagulation remains unclear.

Alcohol and the pancreas

Alcohol abuse predisposes to acute and chronic pancreatitis, both of which carry a substantial risk of serious complications and even death. The various hypotheses for pancreatic damage are discussed, together with the management of alcoholic pancreatitis and the role of operative intervention.

Expert Opinion and Controversies in Musculoskeletal and Sports Medicine: Femoroacetabular Impingement

Standaert CJ, Manner PA, Herring SA. Expert opinion and controversies in musculoskeletal and sports medicine: femoroacetabular impingement. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has been proposed as a distinct clinical entity that may be a potentially significant cause of hip osteoarthritis (OA). There is a growing body of literature on this condition, including descriptions of biomechanic mechanisms of impingement, anatomic and radiographic findings, and surgical interventions. Although a connection between anatomic abnormalities of the hip and the development of OA has been recognized for some time, there are limited data on the natural history of FAI and no long-term studies on the effect of surgical treatment. Thus, the diagnosis engenders a degree of controversy in multiple regards, including the diagnostic criteria and the role of operative intervention.

Long-term Results After Surgery for Autoimmune Sclerosing Pancreatitis

Autoimmune sclerosing pancreatitis (ASP) is a recently recognized cause of chronic pancreatitis. The role of operative intervention in this disease is controversial. A single center experience with 161 consecutive pancreatic resections for chronic pancreatitis was retrospectively reviewed. Operative specimens were reanalyzed and assessed for histological features of ASP. Long-term outcome was assessed by patient survey. Eight patients were identified with histological changes consistent with ASP. The pancreatic anatomic configuration according to intraoperative findings and preoperative radiographic evaluation was categorized into (1) diffusely enlarged pancreas (n = 4), (2) localized mass (n = 2), or (3) refractory pancreatic duct disruption without pancreatic enlargement (n = 2). Five patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and three patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. Perioperative morbidity, operative time, and intraoperative estimated blood loss were similar to the same operation for other etiologies of chronic pancreatitis. Biliary obstruction occurred in two patients. Seven patients were alive 5 ± 0.4 years after operation. Good quality of life measured by the SF-36 questionnaire was present in 4 of 7 patients surveyed. Good pain control was achieved with return to work in 5 of 7 patients. Two patients with poor pain control received glucocorticosteroids therapy without improvement in symptoms. Patients with ASP and a mass suspicious for malignancy or refractory duct disruption require operative intervention. Early postoperative outcome, long-term pain control, and improvement in quality of life appear to be good.

Overall Surgical Results of Occult Vascular Malformations

Surgical experience with angiographically occult vascular malformations, specifically cavernous malformations (CMs), has increased substantially over recent years. CMs are generally well-circumscribed, low-pressure vascular lesions amenable to resection. Overall, results obtained with operative management have been favorable; however, the location of the lesion impacts significantly on the outcome and morbidity of surgery, with those located within deep and brain stem regions carrying a higher incidence of persistent neurologic complications. As knowledge emerges regarding the long-term natural history of these lesions, the role of operative intervention in cases where surgical morbidity is high will become better defined.