Role Of Nonspecific Interactions Research Articles

Alteration of the -35 and -10 sequences and deletion the upstream sequence of the -35 region of the promoter A1 of the phage T7 in dsDNA confirm the contribution of non-specific interactions with E. coli RNA polymerase to the transcription initiation process.

Transcription initiation is a multi-step process, in which the RNA polymerase holoenzyme binds to the specific promoter sequences to form a closed complex, which, through intermediate stages, isomerizes into an open complex capable of initiating the productive phase of transcription. The aim of this work was to determine the contribution of the -10 and -35 regions of the promoter, as well as the role of non-specific interactions, in the binding of RNA polymerase and the formation of an active initiation complex capable of transcription. Therefore, fragments of promoter DNA, derived from the strong promoter A1 of the phage T7, containing completely and partially altered elements -35 and -10, and devoid of an upstream region, were constructed using genetic engineering methods. Functional analyses of modified promoter fragments were carried out, checking their ability to form binary complexes with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) and the efficiency of converting binary complexes into triple complexes characteristic of the productive phase of transcription. The obtained results suggest that, in relation to the A1 promoter of the T7 phage, the most important role of the -35 region is carrying the open complex through the next phases of transcription initiation. The weakening of specific impacts within the region -35 is a reason for the defect associated with the transformation of the open complex, formed by a DNA fragment containing the completely altered -35 region, into elongation and the impairment of RNA synthesis. This leads to breaking contacts with the RNA polymerase holoenzyme, and destabilization and disintegration of the complex in the initial phase of productive transcription. This confirms the hypothesis of the so-called stressed intermediate state associated with the stage of transition from the open complex to the elongation complex. The experiments carried out in this work confirm also that the process of promoter localization and recognition, as well as the formation of binary complexes, is sequential in nature, and that the region located upstream of the -35 hexamer, and the hexamer itself, plays here an additive role.

Role of non-specific interactions in the phase-separation and maturation of macromolecules.

Phase separation of biomolecules could be mediated by both specific and non-specific interactions. How the interplay between non-specific and specific interactions along with polymer entropy influences phase separation is an open question. We address this question by simulating self-associating molecules as polymer chains with a short core stretch that forms the specifically interacting functional interface and longer non-core regions that participate in non-specific/promiscuous interactions. Our results show that the interplay of specific (strength, ϵsp) and non-specific interactions (strength, ϵns) could result in phase separation of polymers and its transition to solid-like aggregates (mature state). In the absence of ϵns, the polymer chains do not dwell long enough in the vicinity of each other to undergo phase separation and transition into a mature state. On the other hand, in the limit of strong ϵns, the assemblies cannot transition into the mature state and form a non-specific assembly, suggesting an optimal range of interactions favoring mature multimers. In the scenario where only a fraction (Nfrac) of the non-core regions participate in attractive interactions, we find that slight modifications to either ϵns or Nfrac can result in dramatically altered self-assembled states. Using a combination of heterogeneous and homogeneous mix of polymers, we establish how this interplay between interaction energies dictates the propensity of biomolecules to find the correct binding partner at dilute concentrations in crowded environments.

The Role of Non-Specific Interactions in Canonical and ALT-Associated PML-Bodies Formation and Dynamics.

In this work, we put forward a hypothesis about the decisive role of multivalent nonspecific interactions in the early stages of PML body formation. Our analysis of the PML isoform sequences showed that some of the PML isoforms, primarily PML-II, are prone to phase separation due to their polyampholytic properties and the disordered structure of their C-terminal domains. The similarity of the charge properties of the C-terminal domains of PML-II and PML-VI isoforms made it possible for the first time to detect migration of PML-VI from PML bodies to the periphery of the cell nucleus, similar to the migration of PML-II isoforms. We found a population of “small” (area less than 1 µm2) spherical PML bodies with high dynamics of PML isoforms exchange with nucleoplasm and a low fraction of immobilized proteins, which indicates their liquid state properties. Such structures can act as “seeds” of functionally active PML bodies, providing the necessary concentration of PML isoforms for the formation of intermolecular disulfide bonds between PML monomers. FRAP analysis of larger bodies of toroidal topology showed the existence of an insoluble scaffold in their structure. The hypothesis about the role of nonspecific multiple weak interactions in the formation of PML bodies is further supported by the change in the composition of the scaffold proteins of PML bodies, but not their solidification, under conditions of induction of dimerization of PML isoforms under oxidative stress. Using the colocalization of ALT-associated PML bodies (APBs) with TRF1, we identified APBs and showed the difference in the dynamic properties of APBs and canonical PML bodies.

The role of non-specific interactions in a patchy model of protein crystallization.

We use a coarse-grained model for generic proteins to investigate the formation of structures with P212121 symmetry, the most prevalent space group of protein crystals. To account for the string directionality of protein-protein interactions that has been suggested by previous studies, we represent proteins as spherical particles that are covered by a large number of small, attractive "patches" that are randomly distributed on the protein surface. Attractive interactions between two proteins can then involve several pairs of patches interacting simultaneously. Our results suggest that the unit cell with the lowest energy is not necessarily the one that grows fastest. Rather, growth is favoured if 1) new particles can attach with enough bonds to the growth front and 2) particles that attach in crystallographically inequivalent positions bind to the surface with similar strength [corrected]. We subsequently study the impact of interactions that are not part of crystalline contacts and find that when these non-specific interactions are few and weaker than the crystal contacts, both nucleation and growth are successful. If the proportion of non-specific interactions is increased, crystal growth is still possible in a small range of model temperature.

Mechanisms of Protein Binding to DNA: Statistical Interactions are Important

Protein molecules binding to DNA initiate sequences of biochemical transitions that control and regulate all major processes in living cells (1). It has long been understood that the efficient transfer of genetic information is possible when genome-regulating protein molecules are found to be strongly bound to special sequences on DNA, known as specific binding sites. It was later realized that finding these target sequences might be complicated by the existence of a large number (≃106–109 per DNA) of other nonspecific binding sites and because of low concentrations of relevant protein molecules (2–4). Although significant experimental and theoretical efforts to investigate mechanisms of protein binding to DNA have been made, the role and functioning of nonspecific interactions has not been fully understood.

Role of Nonspecific Interactions in Molecular Chaperones through Model-Based Bioinformatics

Molecular chaperones are large proteins or protein complexes from which many proteins require assistance in order to fold. One unique property of molecular chaperones is the cavity they provide in which proteins fold. The interior surface residues which make up the cavities of molecular chaperone complexes from different organisms has recently been identified, including the well-studied GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex found in E. coli. It was found that the interior of these protein complexes is significantly different than other protein surfaces and that the residues found on the protein surface are able to resist protein adsorption when immobilized on a surface. Yet it remains unknown if these residues passively resist protein binding inside GroEL-GroEs, as demonstrated by experiments which created synthetic mimics of the interior cavity, or if the interior also actively stabilizes protein folding. To answer this question, we have extended entropic models of substrate protein folding inside GroEL-GroES to include interaction energies between substrate proteins and the GroEL-GroES chaperone complex. This model was tested on a set of 528 proteins and the results qualitatively match experimental observations. The interior residues were found to strongly discourage the exposure of any hydrophobic residues, providing an enhanced hydrophobic effect inside the cavity which actively influences protein folding. This work provides both a mechanism for active protein stabilization in GroEL-GroES and a model which matches current understanding the chaperone protein.

Role of Nonspecific Interactions in Molecular Chaperones through Model-Based Bioinformatics

Molecular chaperones are large proteins or protein complexes from which many proteins require assistance in order to fold. One unique property of molecular chaperones is the cavity they provide in which proteins fold. The interior surface residues which make up the cavities of molecular chaperone complexes from different organisms has recently been identified, including the well-studied GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex found in Escherichia coli. It was found that the interior of these protein complexes is significantly different than other protein surfaces and that the residues found on the protein surface are able to resist protein adsorption when immobilized on a surface. Yet it remains unknown if these residues passively resist protein binding inside GroEL-GroEs (as demonstrated by experiments that created synthetic mimics of the interior cavity) or if the interior also actively stabilizes protein folding. To answer this question, we have extended entropic models of substrate protein folding inside GroEL-GroES to include interaction energies between substrate proteins and the GroEL-GroES chaperone complex. This model was tested on a set of 528 proteins and the results qualitatively match experimental observations. The interior residues were found to strongly discourage the exposure of any hydrophobic residues, providing an enhanced hydrophobic effect inside the cavity that actively influences protein folding. This work provides both a mechanism for active protein stabilization in GroEL-GroES and a model that matches contemporary understanding of the chaperone protein.