Role Of MEK1 Research Articles

Role of MEK1 and DIAPH3 Expression in Colorectal Carcinoma

Background: Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the serious causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is characterized by activating mutations in genes encoding Receptor Tyrosine Kinases (RAS, RAF, MEK1 or MEK2) which act as driving oncogenes. DIAPH3 deficiency has been reported to enhance cancer cell motility, invasion and metastasis and also correlates with aggressive behaviour of cancer. Aim: To study the overexpression of MEK1 and DIAPH3 in CRC patients and their prognostic significance. Methods: We examined the immunohistochemical expression of MEK1 and DIAPH3 using tissue microarray technique in 150 CRC specimens divided into two groups. The mucinous group (MG) included specimens of 56 mucinous adenocarcinoma and 19 signet ring cell carcinoma, while the non-mucinous group (NMG) included 75 non-mucinous adenocarcinoma specimens for comparison. Results: MEK1 and DIAPH3 were strongly expressed in >50% of the studied specimens. The positivity of MEK1 expression was significantly higher in NMG compared to MG (66.7% and 34.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). In all cases, the overexpression of MEK1 was significantly associated with peri-tumoral and intra-tumoral lymphocytic response (p=0.005 and 0.008, respectively). Furthermore, MEK1 overexpression showed statistically significant correlation with better OS (p=0.023) in the whole group of patients. The expression of DIAPH-3 did not differ significantly between NMG and MG (53.3% and 47.1%, respectively; p=0.456). There was strong relation between the overexpression of MEK1 and DIAPH3 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results suggest a potential synergistic role of MEK1 and DIAPH3 overexpression and the development of CRC. Further large scale studies are warranted.

Abstract 306: Identifying Downstream Effectors of the Extracellular Signal-related Kinase 1/2-controlled Directional Growth Response in Cardiomyocytes

A better understating of the mechanisms by which cardiomyocytes grow in different directions could open up new therapeutic avenues for hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies, diseases that include the lengthening and widening of cardiomyocytes, respectively. To-date the only known proteins found to control this directional growth of cardiomyocytes are MEK1, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1, and ERK1/2, extracellular signal-related kinase 1/2. The only known role of MEK1 is to phosphorylate ERK1/2 after MEK1 itself becomes phosphorylated through RAS/RAF signaling. Upon phospho-activation, ERK1/2 can interact with targets in the cytoplasm or translocate to the nucleus to induce cell growth and proliferation pathways. We previously found that cardiac overexpression of activated MEK1 causes cardiac hypertrophy and cardiomyocyte widening, while genetic ablation of ERK1/2 proteins in the heart causes dilation and cardiomyocyte lengthening. To determine how these proteins may control this directional growth response, we conducted a phosphoproteomic screen using neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs) treated with activated MEK1 adenovirus, U0126 (a MEK1 inhibitor), or GFP adenovirus (control). For proteins with the greatest change in phosphorylation upon MEK1 activation or inhibition, we have verified the screen results using Phos-tag gels and western blots. Many of these hits have cytoskeletal or actin regulatory functions, and a few have also been implicated in stress-sensing in previous literature in other cells types. Furthermore, many hits showed increased protein levels in addition to augmented phosphorylation in NRVMs treated with activated MEK1 adenovirus. Given our nearly 20 interesting candidate proteins, we are currently conducting an in vivo screen in which each gene is individually expressed in mice using AAV9. After injection of virus into the thoracic cavities of P5 wild type mice, we are assessing if cardiac hypertrophy/dilation or cardiomyocyte dimensional growth are present at 4 months of age. Any novel candidates identified in this manner will be presented.

Role of MEK1 in TLR4 Mediated Signaling.

Role of MEK1 in TLR4 Mediated Signaling.

MEK1 is required for the development of NRAS-driven leukemia.

The dual-specificity kinases MEK1 and MEK2 act downstream of RAS/RAF to induce ERK activation, which is generally considered protumorigenic. Activating MEK mutations have not been discovered in leukemia, in which pathway activation is caused by mutations in upstream components such as RAS or Flt3. The anti-leukemic potential of MEK inhibitors is being tested in clinical trials; however, downregulation of MEK1 promotes Eμ-Myc-driven lymphomagenesis and MEK1 ablation induces myeloproliferative disease in mice, raising the concern that MEK inhibitors may be inefficient or counterproductive in this context. We investigated the role of MEK1 in the proliferation of human leukemic cell lines and in retroviral models of leukemia. Our data show that MEK1 suppression via RNA interference and genomic engineering does not affect the proliferation of human leukemic cell lines in culture; similarly, MEK1 ablation does not impact the development of MYC-driven leukemia in vivo. In contrast, MEK1 ablation significantly reduces tumorigenesis driven by Nras alone or in combination with Myc. Thus, while MEK1 restricts proliferation and tumorigenesis in some cellular and genetic contexts, it cannot be considered a tumor suppressor in the context of leukemogenesis. On the contrary, its role in NRAS-driven leukemogenesis advocates the use of MEK inhibitors, particularly in combination with PI3K/AKT inhibitors, in hematopoietic malignancies involving RAS activation.

MEK1 and MEK2 inhibitors and cancer therapy: the long and winding road.

The role of the ERK signalling pathway in cancer is thought to be most prominent in tumours in which mutations in the receptor tyrosine kinases RAS, BRAF, CRAF, MEK1 or MEK2 drive growth factor-independent ERK1 and ERK2 activation and thence inappropriate cell proliferation and survival. New drugs that inhibit RAF or MEK1 and MEK2 have recently been approved or are currently undergoing late-stage clinical evaluation. In this Review, we consider the ERK pathway, focusing particularly on the role of MEK1 and MEK2, the 'gatekeepers' of ERK1/2 activity. We discuss their validation as drug targets, the merits of targeting MEK1 and MEK2 versus BRAF and the mechanisms of action of different inhibitors of MEK1 and MEK2. We also consider how some of the systems-level properties (intrapathway regulatory loops and wider signalling network connections) of the ERK pathway present a challenge for the success of MEK1 and MEK2 inhibitors, discuss mechanisms of resistance to these inhibitors, and review their clinical progress.

Constitutively active MEK1 is sufficient to induce epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition in intestinal epithelial cells and to promote tumor invasion and metastasis

Constitutive activation of the MAP kinase kinase MEK1 induces oncogenic transformation in intestinal epithelial cells. Loss of cell-cell adhesion followed by the dissociation of epithelial structures is a prerequisite for increased cell motility and tumor invasion. This phenotypic switch is designated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). EMT also plays an important role in determining the dissemination of tumors. However, the role of MEK1 in intestinal EMT, tumor invasion and metastasis has not been elucidated. To determine the functions of activated MEK1 in intestinal tumorigenesis, we established intestinal epithelial cell lines that overexpress wild-type MEK1 (wtMEK) or activated MEK1 (caMEK). Our results indicate that expression of caMEK is sufficient to induce EMT as confirmed with the induction of N-cadherin, vimentin, Snail1 and Snail2, whereas a reduction in E-cadherin, occludin, ZO-1 and cortical F-actin was noted. The Snail1 and Snail2 promoter analyses revealed that Egr-1 and Fra-1, an AP-1 protein, are responsible for MEK1-induced Snail1 and Snail2 expression, respectively. Cells expressing activated MEK1 clearly acquired an invasive capacity when compared to wtMEK-expressing cells. Zymography studies confirmed elevated levels of MMP2 and MMP9 activities in media of caMEK-expressing cells. Importantly, cells expressing activated MEK1 induced tumors with short latency in correlation with their ability to induce experimental metastasis in vivo and to express factors known to promote colorectal cancer cell metastasis. In conclusion, our results demonstrate, for the first time, that constitutive activation of MEK1 in intestinal epithelial cells is sufficient to induce an EMT associated with tumor invasion and metastasis.

A novel role for activating transcription factor-2 in 15(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid-induced angiogenesis

To investigate the mechanisms underlying 15(S)-HETE-induced angiogenesis, we have studied the role of the small GTPase, Rac1. We find that 15(S)-HETE activated Rac1 in human retinal microvascular endothelial cells (HRMVEC) in a time-dependent manner. Blockade of Rac1 by adenovirus-mediated expression of its dominant negative mutant suppressed HRMVEC migration as well as tube formation and Matrigel plug angiogenesis. 15(S)-HETE stimulated Src in HRMVEC in a time-dependent manner and blockade of its activation inhibited 15(S)-HETE-induced Rac1 stimulation in HRMVEC and the migration and tube formation of these cells as well as Matrigel plug angiogenesis. 15(S)-HETE stimulated JNK1 in Src-Rac1-dependent manner in HRMVEC and adenovirus-mediated expression of its dominant negative mutant suppressed the migration and tube formation of these cells and Matrigel plug angiogenesis. 15(S)-HETE activated ATF-2 in HRMVEC in Src-Rac1-JNK1-dependent manner and interference with its activation via adenovirus-mediated expression of its dominant negative mutant abrogated migration and tube formation of HRMVEC and Matrigel plug angiogenesis. In addition, 15(S)-HETE-induced MEK1 stimulation was found to be dependent on Src-Rac1 activation. Blockade of MEK1 activation inhibited 15(S)-HETE-induced JNK1 activity and ATF-2 phosphorylation. Together, these findings show that 15(S)-HETE activates ATF-2 via the Src-Rac1-MEK1-JNK1 signaling axis in HRMVEC leading to their angiogenic differentiation.

Major contribution of MEK1 to the activation of ERK1/ERK2 and to the growth of LS174T colon carcinoma cells

Mammalian cells express two closely related MEK isoforms, MEK1 and MEK2, upstream of the ERK1/ERK2 MAPK module. Although genetic studies have suggested that MEK1 and MEK2 do not have overlapping functions in vivo, little is known about their specific contribution to the activation of ERKs and to tumor cell proliferation. We used Tet-inducible shRNA to investigate the independent role of MEK1 and MEK2 for the oncogenic and the serum-induced activation of ERK1 and ERK2 in LS174T colon carcinoma cells. We show that MEK1 is the main activator of both ERK1 and ERK2. MEK2 removal has no impact by itself but it can cooperate with MEK1 ablation for the inhibition of ERK1/2 activity. In addition, we show that MEK1 is the critical isoform regulating tumor cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo.

15(S)-HETE Production in Human Retinal Microvascular Endothelial Cells by Hypoxia: Novel Role for MEK1 in 15(S)-HETE–Induced Angiogenesis

To examine for the expression of 15-lipoxygenase 1 (15-LOX1) and 15-LOX2 in human retinal microvascular endothelial cells (HRMVECs) and study the role of arachidonic acid metabolites of these enzymes in angiogenesis. Quantitative RT-PCR and reverse-phase HPLC analyses were used to determine 15-LOX1/2 expression and their arachidonic acid metabolites in HRMVECs. The role of MEK1 in 15(S)-HETE-induced angiogenesis was studied using HRMVEC migration, tube formation, and basement membrane matrix plug angiogenesis. HRMVECs expressed both 15-LOX1 and 15-LOX2. Hypoxia induced the expression of 15-LOX1 and the production of its arachidonic acid metabolites 15(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (15(S)-HETE) and 12(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (12(S)-HETE). 15(S)-HETE stimulated HRMVEC migration and tube formation as potently as 20 ng/mL fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). In addition, 15(S)-HETE stimulated the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK1, p38 MAPK, and MEK1 in a time-dependent manner in these cells. Inhibition of MEK1 by pharmacologic and dominant-negative mutant approaches attenuated 15(S)-HETE-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and JNK1 but not p38 MAPK. Blockade of ERK1/2 and JNK1 activation suppressed 15(S)-HETE-induced HRMVEC migration and tube formation and basement membrane matrix plug angiogenesis. Inhibition of p38 MAPK attenuated 15(S)-HETE-induced HRMVEC migration only. Inhibition of MEK1 also blocked 15(S)-HETE-induced HRMVEC migration and tube formation and basement membrane matrix plug angiogenesis. These results suggest that hypoxia, through the induction of 15-LOX1 expression, leads to the production of 15(S)-HETE in HRMVECs. In addition, 15(S)-HETE, through MEK1-dependent activation of ERK1/2 and JNK1, stimulates the angiogenic differentiation of HRMVECs and basement membrane matrix plug angiogenesis.