Role Of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Research Articles

Abstract PO5-14-08: External Reproducibility of PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx on Breast Cancer Specimens at CPS ≥ 1 and CPS ≥ 10 Cutoffs

Abstract Background: PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx is an approved companion diagnostic for pembrolizumab treatment in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Clinical evidence for pembrolizumab approval in TNBC was demonstrated by KEYNOTE-355 (NCT02819518), which investigated the clinical validity of PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx in identifying patients with PD-L1 expressing Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥ 10 in previously untreated locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic TNBC.1 The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors for breast cancer as a whole is not as well defined as it is for TNBC. In this study, we show evidence of the reproducibility of PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx in PD-L1 expression determination in breast cancer specimens at the CPS ≥ 1 and CPS ≥ 10 cutoffs documenting robust assay performance in breast cancer. Methods: A blinded, randomized study was conducted at three external sites using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer specimens. Reproducibility of PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx was assessed at the inter-site, intra-site/inter-day, inter-observer, and intra-observer endpoints at the CPS ≥ 1 and CPS ≥ 10 cutoffs. To assess inter-site and intra-site reproducibility, five replicate sets of pre-qualified unstained specimens were stained and evaluated at each of the three external sites. To assess inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility, one set of pre-stained specimens was evaluated three times by each of three external pathologists. Negative percent agreement (NPA), positive percent agreement (PPA), and overall percent agreement (OA), based on comparisons to consensus diagnostic outcome, were computed with corresponding two-sided 95% percentile bootstrap confidence intervals. Acceptance criteria required at least 85.0% for the lower-bound (LB) of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on NPA, PPA, and OA for all endpoints. Results: All but one endpoint in the external reproducibility study met pre-determined acceptance criteria. Both the inter- and intra-site reproducibility endpoints had 95% CI LB values of 98.8% for NPA, 95.9% for PPA, and 97.9% OA at the CPS ≥ 1 cutoff. At the CPS ≥ 10 cutoff, the inter-site reproducibility endpoint had 95% CI LB values of 88.0% for NPA, 87.1% for PPA, and 89.5% OA, and the intra-site reproducibility endpoint had 95% CI LB values of 96.7% for NPA, 92.2% for PPA, and 95.6% OA. The inter-observer reproducibility endpoint had 95% CI LB values of 95.3% for NPA, 92.3% for PPA, and 94.7% OA at the CPS ≥ 1 cutoff. At the CPS ≥ 10 cutoff, the inter-observer reproducibility endpoint had 95% CI LB values of 84.9% for NPA, 86.8% for PPA, and 87.3% OA. The intra-observer reproducibility endpoint had 95% CI LB values of 97.0% for NPA, 95.0% for PPA, and 96.6% OA at the CPS ≥ 1 cutoff. At the CPS ≥ 10 cutoff, the intra-observer reproducibility endpoint had 95% CI LB values of 92.2% for NPA, 89.2% for PPA, and 91.7% OA. Conclusions: Acceptance criteria were met for all endpoints in the breast cancer external reproducibility study of PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx at the CPS ≥ 1 and CPS ≥ 10 cutoffs, except for inter-observer at the CPS ≥ 10 cutoff, which had a 95% CI LB value of 84.9% for NPA.

Complete Response to Immunotherapy Using Pembrolizumab in a Patient With Conjunctival Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Nodal Metastasis.

A 92-year-old woman presented with a large bulbar conjunctival mass in the OD. She also had a palpable parotid mass which on fine needle aspiration biopsy confirmed to be metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. The conjunctival mass was biopsied to confirm the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma with positive programmed cell death ligand 1 expression and a high tumor mutation burden. She was treated with pembrolizumab and had complete resolution of the conjunctival mass and the associated parotid metastasis after just 2 cycles of treatment. This case underscores the promising role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma, especially when surgery is associated with significant ocular morbidity, in patients who may not be good surgical candidates, or in patients with metastasis.

Retreatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the New Scenario of Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The advent of immunotherapy has transformed the treatment paradigm for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the past few years, several studies have investigated the potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in resectable and unresectable locally advanced disease, achieving remarkable results that led to their approval in clinical practice. However, there is limited evidence on immunotherapy rechallenge after recurrence, with the majority of available knowledge coming from retrospective studies which involve heavily pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. The recent introduction in the curative setting and the potential regulatory restrictions raise questions about the optimal choice of first-line and subsequent therapies for patients with systemic relapse. The role of immunotherapy readministration in this new scenario needs to be clarified, as well as the identification of patients for whom it is more appropriate, including clinical characteristics, duration of response, switching to other ICIs, reasons for discontinuation and immune-related toxicity. Here, we review literature on rechallenge with immunotherapy, including efficacy, safety profile and potential predictive factors of response.

Exploring the prognostic impact of absolute lymphocyte count in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors

BackgroundThe role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) expands but affordable and reproducible prognostic biomarkers are needed. We investigated the association between baseline and 3-month absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and survival for patients on ICI.MethodsA retrospective study investigated patients who received ICI July 2014—August 2019. Survival probabilities were calculated for lymphocyte subsets. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate risk factors for lymphopenia.ResultsAmong 179 patients, median age was 62 and 41% were female. The most common diagnoses were melanoma (41%) and lung cancer (40%). Median PFS was 6.5 months. 27% had baseline lymphopenia (ALC < 1 × 109cells/L) and no significant difference in PFS or OS to those with normal ALC. However, 31% had lymphopenia at 3 months and significantly shorter OS than those without (9.8 vs 18.3 months, p < 0.001). Those with baseline lymphopenia who recovered counts at 3 months had no difference in PFS (median NR vs 13.0 months, p = 0.48) or OS (22 vs 18.3 months, p = 0.548) to those never lymphopenic. The strongest risk factor for lymphopenia on multivariable analysis was previous radiation therapy (RT).Conclusions3-month lymphopenia is a negative prognostic marker in cancer patients on ICI. Previous RT is significantly associated with lymphopenia.

Progress in research and treatment of immune checkpoints in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor among women often involving the toxicity of conventional chemotherapy alongside organ-specific side effects. As immunotherapeutic agents in anti-tumor, new immune checkpoints are constantly being dug and discovered. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the process of tumor immune evasion has assumed increasing significance. Currently, clinical research outcomes on immunotherapy for breast cancer vary, reflecting diverse efficacy profile of immune checkpoints. This article provides an overview of immune checkpoint suppression therapy, and track the evolving research and therapeutic application of immune checkpoints related to breast cancer.

Abstract CT208: High tumor monocyte content predicts long-term survival for patients with operable oesophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in the LUD2015-005 trial

Abstract Background: Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with chemotherapy in advanced oesophageal cancer (OC) has shown survival benefit in phase III studies, resulting in ICI’s recent approval to treat advanced OC. The role of ICI in peri-operative OC is debated, and large clinical studies are ongoing. Patients’ response to immunochemotherapy is highly variable and it is unclear what underlies this heterogeneity. To address this challenge, 38 advanced and 35 operable OC patients were enrolled to receive ICI in the LUD2015-005 trial (NCT02735239). Methods: We investigated the clinical and biological effects of adding the anti-PD-L1 ICI durvalumab to peri-operative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in a phase II multicentre study (LUD2015-005 trial). Operable OC patients received ICI for four weeks, followed by combination treatment with ICI + chemotherapy (oxaliplatin and capecitabine or fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT)), or ICI + CRT (CROSS regimen). Patients could also receive ICI for up to 6 months after surgery. Tissue samples were collected at baseline, after four weeks ICI-only, and on the day of surgery. Further to assessing synergy of ICI with standard peri-operative treatment for OC, our trial design enables an in-depth analysis of molecular features of response, and to dissect the impact of ICI alone on the tumor microenvironment. Single cell and bulk transcriptomic data were generated and used to perform RNA deconvolution to estimate tumor cell composition. Results: The treatment was well-tolerated and two-year survival was 80% and 73.3% with ICI + chemotherapy and ICI + CRT, respectively. Survival was superior to that of propensity score matched patients receiving standard of care (p = 0.047). Tumor cell composition analysis revealed that neither total T-cell numbers nor a specific T-cell functional phenotype was associated with outcome, but high tumor monocyte content (TMC) at baseline was highly predictive of overall survival (p = 0.003). Moreover, a 13-gene core monocyte gene signature was sufficient to predict overall survival (p = 0.022) and major pathological response (mPR, Mandard 1-2, p = 0.009). Patients with mPR at resection showed enrichment of interferon and IL15 signalling at the four-week ICI-only timepoint (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Single cell trajectory interference combined with immune response enrichment analysis also show that high interferon and IL15 signalling drive monocytes to differentiate into M1 macrophages and dendritic cells. Conclusion: Similar to our previous finding in immunochemotherapy treated advanced OC patients (Carroll et al. Cancer Cell 2023), TMC is a highly predictive biomarker of long-term survival for operable OC patients treated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, highlighting the importance of tumor monocytes and their differentiation potential in OC patients’ response to ICI. Citation Format: Hannah S. Fuchs, Sabrina A. James, Thomas M. Carroll, Phil F. Xie, Joseph A. Chadwick, Duncan Parkes, Simon R. Lord, Lucinda Griffiths, Tim Underwood, Ioannis Karydis, Russell T. Petty, Benjamin Schuster-Böckler, Richard P. Owen, Mark R. Middleton, Xin Lu. High tumor monocyte content predicts long-term survival for patients with operable oesophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in the LUD2015-005 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT208.

PD-L1 expression in pancreaticobiliary adenosquamous carcinoma: a single-institution case series.

The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway is a potent negative regulator of T-cell-mediated immune response that is upregulated in many neoplasms. Pancreaticobiliary adenosquamous carcinoma (PB-ASC) is an aggressive cancer that carries a poorer prognosis compared with pure pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma (PB-AC). To date, there is little published information regarding PD-L1 expression in PB-ASC. The aim of the study was to examine the relationship between PD-L1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in PB-ASC and PB-AC. We evaluated 15 PB-ASCs (10 pancreatic, 5 gallbladder) and 34 control PB-ACs (22 pancreatic ductal, and 12 gallbladder) for tumor expression of PD-L1 using anti-PD-L1 (E1L3N) antibody. All tumors were classified into three immune phenotypes: immune inflamed (II), immune excluded (IE), and immune desert (ID) according to the distribution of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in tumor tissues. The frequency of PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in PB-ASC (10/15; 66.7%) than in PB-AC (3/34; 8.8%). In PB-ASC, PD-L1 expression occurred exclusively in the squamous component in six cases, exclusively in the glandular component in one case, and in both the squamous and the glandular components in three cases. PD-L1 expression in PB-ASC was irrespective of the tumor immune status, whereas its expression in PB-AC was observed only in tumors with the II or IE phenotype. The ID phenotype was relatively rare (4/15; 26.7%) in PB-ASC compared with PB-AC (22/34; 65%; P=0.02). PB-ASCs are notably enriched in inflammatory response and showed significantly higher PD-L1 expression than PB-AC (P<0.001), suggesting a potential therapeutic role for immune checkpoint inhibitors in managing patients with PB-ASC.

Abstract 6469: The association of mismatch repair gene alterations with elevated tumor mutational burden in microsatellite stable gastrointestinal cancers

Abstract Background: Benefit from single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor has been observed in 5-10% of the patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, a reliable predictive marker to immune checkpoint inhibitor has not been discovered in this patient population. We sought to assess the incidence of mismatch repair (MMR) gene alterations and their association with tumor mutational burden (TMB) in MSS GI cancers. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced GI cancer who had molecular profiling of the tumor using either Guardant360 blood-based or Tempus tissue next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms between 2020 and 2023. We assessed four MMR genes including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 for alterations. Continuous variables were summarized as median and interquartile range (IQR) and compared using Mann-Whitney test. Categorical variables were summarized as counts and proportions and compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results: A total of 2920 patients with Guardant360 were included with a median age of 65 (IQR: 56-73) years. 870 (30%) patients had pancreas cancer; 846 (29%) patients had colorectal cancer; 688 (24%) patients had biliary tract cancers; and the rest had other GI cancers. Among patients evaluable for microsatellite instability (MSI) status, 58 patients (2%) had MSI-high GI cancers, 31 (53%) of whom had MMR gene alterations. 2445 (98%) patients had MSS GI cancers, 130 (5.3%) of whom had MMR gene alterations. Patients with MSS GI cancers bearing MMR gene alterations had a median age of 70 (IQR: 62-75) years, significantly older than those without MMR gene alterations (p&amp;lt;0.001). In addition, patients with MMR gene alterations had significantly higher median blood TMB of 11 (IQR: 7.4-16) mut/Mb compared to 7.7 (IQR: 4.8-11) mut/Mb in patients without MMR gene alterations. In MSS GI cancers, MMR gene alterations are more commonly associated with the presence of alterations in APC (p=0.03), TP53 (p=0.01), CTNNB1 (p&amp;lt;0.001) and SMAD4 (p=0.01). 1453 patients with GI cancer and Tempus tissue NGS data were included as a validation cohort. They had comparable demographics with the Guardant360 cohort. 14 (1.6%) of 896 patients with MSS GI cancers had MMR gene alterations, significantly fewer (p&amp;lt;0.001) than those found in the Guardant360 cohort. Patients with MMR gene alterations and wild type POLE had significantly higher (p=0.001) median TMB of 9.8 (IQR: 4.8-14) mut/Mb compared to 4.7 (IQR: 3.2-6.3) mut/Mb in patients without MMR gene alterations. Conclusions: MMR gene alterations can be identified by clinical NGS platforms in a small proportion of patients with MSS GI cancers. They are associated with elevated TMB, which may suggest a hypermutated profile serving as a basis for potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitor in MSS GI cancers. Citation Format: Conor D. O'Donnell, Mojun Zhu, Hao Xie. The association of mismatch repair gene alterations with elevated tumor mutational burden in microsatellite stable gastrointestinal cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6469.

The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the development and treatment of infectious processes

The incidence and prevalence of oncological diseases, which are in second place in terms of the frequency of causes of death, is steadily increasing among the population of the Russian Federation. Advances in translational medicine, including immunotherapy, have revolutionized cancer treatment strategies. A special breakthrough has been achieved in two areas of immunotherapy that have modernized cancer treatment: chimeric T-cell receptors and antibodies known as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICTs) blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and ligand programmed cell death receptor (PD-L1). ICTs enhance the adaptive immune response of the tumor and can cause adverse effects as a result of hyperactivation of T cells, which often leads to the emergence of an opportunistic infection. In addition, immunosuppressive drugs, which are often prescribed to mitigate the side effects associated with ICT, are also a risk factor for infection. The purpose of the review is to analyze the literature on possible relationships between ICT inhibitors and the risk of infection, as well as to consider the possible benefits of ICT inhibitors as a treatment for various types of infections, including viral, parasitic and fungal, as well as sepsis. Although ICT inhibitors have demonstrated the ability to significantly prolong the life expectancy of patients with advanced cancer, they often lead to adverse events, which often requires treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, including corticosteroids, anti-TNF and other biological agents. The overall effect of ICT inhibitors on human infections remains poorly understood. Further research is needed to understand the basic mechanisms of the immunological effects of ICT inhibitors on various types of infections, which in some cases may be beneficial.

Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Advanced Pediatric Malignancies in Nationwide Study: Good Outcome in Skin Melanoma and Hodgkin Lymphoma.

The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs; anti-PD1) in the treatment of childhood cancers is still evolving. The aim of this nationwide retrospective study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of ICIs used in a group of 42 patients, with a median age of 13.6 years, with various types of advanced malignancies treated in pediatric oncology centers in Poland between 2015 and 2023. The indications for treatment with anti-PD1 were as follows: Hodgkin lymphoma (11); malignant skin melanoma (9); neuroblastoma (8); and other malignancies (14). At the end of follow-up, complete remission (CR) was observed in 37.7% (15/42) of children and disease stabilization in 9.5% (4/42), with a mean survival 3.6 (95% CI = 2.6-4.6) years. The best survival (OS = 1.0) was observed in the group of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. For malignant melanoma of the skin, neuroblastoma, and other rare malignancies, the estimated 3-year OS values were, respectively, 0.78, 0.33, and 0.25 (p = 0.002). The best progression-free survival value (0.78) was observed in the group with malignant melanoma. Significantly better effects of immunotherapy were confirmed in patients ≥ 14 years of age and good overall performance ECOG status. Severe adverse events were observed in 30.9% (13/42) patients.

Tumor immune microenvironment of KRAS G12C mutated pancreatic cancer as compared to other mutations and non-cancer pancreata.

704 Background: KRAS G12C mutation occurs in approximately 1% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). KRAS G12C inhibitors have a reported response rate of 21-33% in patients with previously treated advanced PDA. KRAS is a known modulator of the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) and a greater understanding of the TME in KRAS G12C as compared to other mutations is crucial for developing rational therapeutic combination strategies in PDA. Methods: We performed multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) on tissue obtained from patients with histologically confirmed PDA (KRAS G12C n=8; other mutations n=108) and normal pancreas (n=38). Serial staining was performed using antibodies against CD3, CD8, CD163, FoxP3 and PanCK for simple and complex phenotyping as well as spatial analyses in the TME. After tyramide based signal amplification, the slides were imaged at 20x magnification using the Mantra Quantitative Pathology workstation. Images were analyzed using inForm Cell Analysis software (Akoya Biosciences). All statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 13.2.0. Differences in phenotype, distances, and engagement were evaluated by 2-tailed Student’s t test or ANOVA. Results: Patients with KRAS G12C mutation had a median age of 70 (45-73) years of which majority (n=5, 62.5%) were men with advanced stage at diagnosis (n=6; 75%). The median overall survival is not yet reached (n=5, alive) after a median follow-up time of 14.4 months through reverse censoring methodology. When examining cellular infiltration, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte cells were significantly more abundant in the G12C TME compared to the cancer and non-cancer controls (p &lt;0.01). Additionally, the relative frequency of CD4+ and Tregs (CD3+/CD8-/FoxP3+) were also significantly higher in G12C (p&lt;0.01). The percentage of CD163+ antigen presenting cells (APCs) out of all cells was significantly higher in G12C (p&lt;0.01) while the percentage of non-functional APCs (PDL1+/CD163+) of all APCs was significantly higher in G12C than cancer and non-cancer controls (p=0.03). In comparison, the PDL1+ epithelial cells were much lower in G12C TME (p&lt;0.01). The cellular engagement and interaction data from the spatial analysis in the TME will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: We identified increased infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and APCs in PDA patients with KRAS G12C mutations relative to other mutations and non-cancerous pancreata. Furthermore, while all PDAs had elevated PD-L1 expression on APCs, KRAS G12C tumors had minimal expression on epithelial cells suggesting a mutation specific impact and a potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with G12C inhibitors.

EMERALD-1: A phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study of transarterial chemoembolization combined with durvalumab with or without bevacizumab in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma eligible for embolization.

LBA432 Background: For &gt;20 years, TACE has been a standard of care for embolization-eligible uHCC; however, most people with uHCC treated with TACE progress within 1 year. Embolization creates a proinflammatory tumor microenvironment and increases VEGF signals; clinical studies have established the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs; e.g. D) and VEGF inhibitors (e.g. B) in advanced HCC. Methods: In EMERALD-1 (NCT03778957; double-blind, global, Phase 3 study), participants (pts) with embolization-eligible uHCC, Child-Pugh A to B7 liver function, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1, and no evidence of extrahepatic disease were randomized 1:1:1 to the D+B+TACE, D+TACE, or TACE arms. TACE was cTACE or DEB-TACE (investigator choice). Pts received D (1500 mg) or placebo for D (Q4W) plus TACE. After completion of last TACE, pts received D (1120 mg) or placebo for D plus B (15 mg/kg) or placebo for B (Q3W). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) for D+B+TACE vs TACE. Secondary endpoints included PFS for D+TACE vs TACE, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and safety for D+B+TACE or D+TACE vs TACE. PFS, ORR, and TTP were assessed by blinded independent central review (RECIST v1.1). Results: In total, 616 pts with BCLC Stage A (25.8%), Stage B (57.3%), and Stage C (16.1%) were randomized to D+B+TACE (n=204), D+TACE (n=207), or TACE (n=205). Demographic and baseline characteristics were generally balanced across arms. At final PFS analysis, the primary objective was met: PFS significantly improved for D+B+TACE vs TACE (median [m]PFS 15.0 vs 8.2 months [mo]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61–0.98; p=0.032 [threshold 0.0434]). Results were consistent across most prespecified subgroups. The secondary endpoint of PFS for D+TACE vs TACE was not statistically significant (mPFS 10.0 vs 8.2 mo; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75–1.19; p=0.638). ORR was 43.6%, 41.0%, and 29.6%, and mTTP was 22.0, 11.5, and 10.0 mo for D+B+TACE, D+TACE, and TACE, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. In the D+B+TACE (n=154), D+TACE (n=232), and TACE (n=200) safety analysis sets, respectively, 32.5%, 15.1%, and 13.5% of pts had maximum Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 8.4%, 4.3%, and 3.5% discontinued due to TRAEs; and 0%, 1.3%, and 2.0% died due to TRAEs. Pts continue to be followed for OS. Conclusions: D+B+TACE is the first ICI-based regimen in a global Phase 3 trial to show statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS, vs TACE, in pts with embolization-eligible uHCC. Safety was manageable and consistent with the safety profiles of D, B, and TACE in uHCC. D+B+TACE has the potential to set a new standard of care in uHCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03778957 .

Role of immunotherapy in gastroesophageal cancer with liver metastasis: A meta-analysis of phase III randomized clinical trials.

319 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated a poor response to immunotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastasis. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with gastroesophageal (GE) cancer with liver metastasis remains unclear. Our objective was to investigate if ICIs are beneficial in patients with GE cancer with liver metastasis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, ESMO, and ASCO Meeting Abstracts for phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing ICIs in metastatic/advanced GE cancer from 2017 to 2023. All phase III RCTs of metastatic GE cancer treated with ICIs that had available data on liver metastasis were analyzed. A meta-analysis was conducted on the survival outcomes (overall and progression-free survival), where hazard ratios were obtained, with 95% confidence intervals, using the standard random effects model. To assess the heterogeneity of the study outcomes, the I2 statistic was obtained. The I2 statistic represented the variability in the meta-analysis attributed to study heterogeneity. These analyses were applied to the overall cohort of studies, as well as within the liver metastasis (yes or no) sub-cohorts. All analyses were conducted in SAS v9.4 (Cary, NC) at a significance level of 0.05. Results: Seven Phase III RCTs were includedthat had available data on overall survival and/or progressive free survival in patients with liver metastasis. Of these, six were in the frontline setting and one in the later line. Overall, 6,109 patients were included. Overall survival was similar among all patients (HR 0.72 [0.67,0.77], p&lt;0.001, I2=0.0%), patients with no liver metastasis (HR 0.73 [0.67,0.81], p&lt;0.001, I2=0.0%), and patients with liver metastasis (HR 0.74 [0.67,0.81], p&lt;0.001, I2=0.0%), indicating that ICIs’ benefit on OS is consistent. Progression-free survival (PFS) was also similar among all patients (HR 0.63 [0.57,0.70], p&lt;0.001, I2=54.7%); those with no liver metastasis (HR 0.62 [0.51,0.76], p&lt;0.001, I2=62.3%), and with liver metastasis (HR 0.66 [0.57,0.76], p&lt;0.001, I2-0.0%). Funnel plots were used to identify a potential bias for studies included in the analysis and showed no significant sources of bias for OS and PFS. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, ICIs were beneficial in patients with GE cancer with and without liver metastasis. However, the majority of the trials were in the frontline setting where ICIs were combined with chemotherapy. Further subgroup analyses should be performed with individual patient-level data to identify patients who respond best to ICIs.

Lack of Reactivation of Latent Tuberculosis despite PD-1 Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy: A Case Report and Systematic Review

Background: Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) has a controversial role in the treatment of Tuberculosis (TB). Several clinical cases of TB development have been reported by administration of anti–PD-1 antibodies for patients with advanced unresectable cancers. Case presentation: In this article, we report an interesting case about a male patient with history of cured pulmonary tuberculosis and a 4-month history of repeated hemoptysis. Imaging showed one mass in the lower lobe of left lung and the other in the left upper lobe. The diagnosis of Non-Small-Ccell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) was determined by biopsy specimens in the lower lobe nodule and cured pulmonary tuberculosis determined by past medical history. He was given neoadjuvant treatment with an anti–PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy. He underwent surgery. Pathological examination revealed Mtb in left upper lobe nodule but previous imaging showed without reactivation and slight reduction in tubercular infection inflammation. The left lower lobe nodule was poorly differentiated carcinoma. Conclusions: Overall, the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancers and latent tuberculosis infection is inconclusive. Although we cannot establish whether patients with stage IIIA NSCLC and concurrent latent pulmonary tuberculosis after surgical evaluation can receive a PD-1 and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy without the activation of pulmonary tuberculosis, our case endorses the need of further evaluation.

The Heart of the Matter: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Immune-Related Adverse Events on the Cardiovascular System.

Cancer remains a prominent global cause of mortality, second only to cardiovascular disease. The past decades have witnessed substantial advancements in anti-cancer therapies, resulting in improved outcomes. Among these advancements, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising breakthrough, leveraging the immune system to target and eliminate cancer cells. Despite the remarkable potential of immunotherapy, concerns have arisen regarding associations with adverse cardiovascular events. This review examines the complex interplay between immunotherapy and cardiovascular toxicity and provides an overview of immunotherapy mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and potential biomarkers for adverse events, while delving into the intricate immune responses and evasion mechanisms displayed by cancer cells. The focus extends to the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy, including CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 targeting antibodies. This review underscores the multifaceted challenges of managing immunotherapy-related cardiovascular toxicity. Risk factors for immune-related adverse events and major adverse cardiac events are explored, encompassing pharmacological, treatment-related, autoimmune, cardiovascular, tumor-related, social, genetic, and immune-related factors. The review also advocates for enhanced medical education and risk assessment tools to identify high-risk patients for preventive measures. Baseline cardiovascular evaluations, potential prophylactic strategies, and monitoring of emerging toxicity symptoms are discussed, along with the potential of adjunct anti-inflammatory therapies.

Favorable outcome of a histiocytic sarcoma patient treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor: a case report

Introduction and Importance: Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is an extremely rare malignancy in which there has been no standard treatment approach. Some preclinical studies have provided rationales for the application of immunotherapy in advanced HS. Case Presentation The authors reported a case of a 61-year-old patient with metastatic HS who had a rapid progression on ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide chemotherapy. The authors performed PD-L1 testing, which showed a strong positivity in 90% of tumor cells. The patient was then treated with pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. He refused palliative radiotherapy. A dramatic response in all sites was recorded on the PET-CT scan after three cycles. He was maintained on pembrolizumab, reaching over 30 months without disease progression. Clinical Discussion Recent molecular data suggests there could be a role of immunotherapy in HS. In our patient, the disease was refractory to chemotherapy and pembrolizumab has been given based on the strong PD-L1 expression. Response to immunotherapy has also been recorded in several cases with malignant histiocytic neoplasm. Conclusion Immunotherapy might bring sustained disease remission in PD-L1 high expression HS and further studies evaluating the role of immune checkpoint inhibitor in this disease are warranted.

Updates in Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive asbestos-associated thoracic malignancy that is usually incurable. As demonstrated in the landmark MARS2 trial, surgical resection does not improve survival outcomes and its role in managing MPM is limited. Whilst platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab was the standard first-lineapproach for unresectable disease, landmark phase 3 trials have now established the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in the upfront management of unresectable disease: either nivolumab-ipilimumab or carboplatin-pemetrexed-pembrolizumab. Patient selection for optimal strategy remains an ongoing question. For relapsed disease novel genomic-based therapies targeting a range of aberrations including losses of the tumour suppressor genes BAP1, CDKN2A and NF2, are being evaluated. Nonetheless, the future of MPM therapeutics holds promise. Here we overview current treatment strategies in the management of MPM.

The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Current State and Outlook.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest tumors, characterized by its aggressive tumor biology and poor prognosis. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a major part in the treatment algorithm of various solid tumors, there is still no evidence of clinical benefit from ICI in patients with metastatic PDAC (mPDAC). This might be due to several reasons, such as the inherent low immunogenicity of pancreatic cancer, the dense stroma-rich tumor microenvironment that precludes an efficient migration of antitumoral effector T cells to the cancer cells, and the increased proportion of immunosuppressive immune cells, such as regulatory T cells (Tregs), cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), facilitating tumor growth and invasion. In this review, we provide an overview of the current state of ICIs in mPDAC, report on the biological rationale to implement ICIs into the treatment strategy of pancreatic cancer, and discuss preclinical studies and clinical trials in this field. Additionally, we shed light on the challenges of implementing ICIs into the treatment strategy of PDAC and discuss potential future directions.

Nivolumab Switch Maintenance Therapy After Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Induction in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial by the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Renal Tumors of the German Cancer Society (NIVOSWITCH; AIO-NZK-0116ass)

BackgroundThe role of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) maintenance therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is undefined. ObjectiveTo determine whether switch maintenance therapy with nivolumab improves clinical outcomes in patients with mRCC with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitivity. Design, setting, and participantsThis open-label phase 2 trial randomized patients with a partial response or stable disease after 10–12-wk TKI induction therapy to either TKI or nivolumab maintenance. Key inclusion criteria were measurable disease, clear cell histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–2, and adequate organ function. InterventionIntravenous nivolumab 8 × 240 mg every 2 wk, followed by 480 mg every 4 wk or sunitinib 50 mg (4–2 regimen) or pazopanib 800 mg once daily orally. Outcome measurements and statistical analysesThe primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03), and patient-reported outcomes (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index). The Kaplan-Meier method, two-sided log-rank tests, and Cox regression models were used for statistical analysis. Results and limitationsMaintenance therapy was nivolumab for 25 patients (51.0%) and TKI for 24 (48.9%). The median age was 65 yr (range 35–79). Nine patients (18.4%) were female, 31 (63.3%) had ECOG PS of 0, and 15 (30.6%) had favorable risk. OS data are immature (17 deaths, 34.7%). The ORR was 20.0% (n = 5) for nivolumab and 52.2% (n = 12) for TKI. PFS was worse with nivolumab (hazard ratio 2.57, 95% confidence interval 1.36–4.89; p = 0.003). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 14 patients (56.0%) with nivolumab and 17 (70.8%) with TKI. A major limitation is early termination of our study. ConclusionsTKI treatment achieved superior ORR and PFS in comparison to nivolumab maintenance therapy. Our data do not indicate a role for nivolumab switch maintenance in mRCC. Patient summaryPatients with metastatic kidney cancer who experienced a tumor response or disease stabilization after a short period of targeted treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor did not benefit from a switch to the immunotherapy drug nivolumab. Patients who continued their original treatment achieved better responses and a longer time without disease progression.This trial is registered on EudraCT as 2016-002170-13 and on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02959554.

Perioperative immunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Now and future.

Esophageal cancer (EC) ranks among the most prevalent malignant tumors affecting the digestive tract. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) stands as the prevailing pathological subtype, encompassing approximately 90% of all EC patients. In clinical stage II-IVA locally advanced ESCC cases, the primary approach to treatment involves a combination of neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection. Despite concerted efforts, the long-term outcomes for ESCC patients remain unsatisfactory, with dismal prognoses. However, recent years have witnessed remarkable strides in immunotherapy, particularly in the second- and first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic ESCC, with the development of monoclonal antibodies that inhibit programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 demonstrating encouraging responses and perioperative clinical benefits for various malignancies, including ESCC. This comprehensive review aims to present the current landscape of perioperative immunotherapy for resectable ESCC, focusing specifically on the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors during the perioperative period. Additionally, the review will explore promising biomarkers and offer insights into future prospects.