Role Of Cross-reactivity Research Articles

Prior viral infection primes cross-reactive CD8+ T cells that respond to mouse heart allografts.

Significant evidence suggests a connection between transplant rejection and the presence of high levels of pre-existing memory T cells. Viral infection can elicit viral-specific memory T cells that cross-react with allo-MHC capable of driving allograft rejection in mice. Despite these advances, and despite their critical role in transplant rejection, a systematic study of allo-reactive memory T cells, their specificities, and the role of cross-reactivity with viral antigens has not been performed. Here, we established a model to identify, isolate, and characterize cross-reactive T cells using Nur77 reporter mice (C57BL/6 background), which transiently express GFP exclusively upon TCR engagement. We infected Nur77 mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV-Armstrong) to generate a robust memory compartment, where quiescent LCMV-specific memory CD8+ T cells could be readily tracked with MHC tetramer staining. Then, we transplanted LCMV immune mice with allogeneic hearts and monitored expression of GFP within MHC-tetramer defined viral-specific T cells as an indicator of their ability to cross-react with alloantigens. Strikingly, prior LCMV infection significantly increased the kinetics and magnitude of rejection as well as CD8+ T cell recruitment into allogeneic, but not syngeneic, transplanted hearts, relative to non-infected controls. Interestingly, as early as day 1 after allogeneic heart transplant an average of ~8% of MHC-tetramer+ CD8+ T cells expressed GFP, in contrast to syngeneic heart transplants, where the frequency of viral-specific CD8+ T cells that were GFP+ was <1%. These data show that a significant percentage of viral-specific memory CD8+ T cells expressed T cell receptors that also recognized alloantigens in vivo. Notably, the frequency of cross-reactive CD8+ T cells differed depending upon the viral epitope. Further, TCR sequences derived from cross-reactive T cells harbored distinctive motifs that may provide insight into cross-reactivity and allo-specificity. In sum, we have established a mouse model to track viral-specific, allo-specific, and cross-reactive T cells; revealing that prior infection elicits substantial numbers of viral-specific T cells that cross-react to alloantigen, respond very early after transplant, and may promote rapid rejection.

Role of cross-reactivity in cellular immune targeting of influenza A M158-66 variant peptide epitopes.

The immunologic significance of cross-reactivity of TCR recognition of peptide:MHC complexes is still poorly understood. We have described TCR cross-reactivity in a system involving polyclonal CD8 T cell recognition of the well characterized influenza viral M158-66 epitope. While M158-66 is generally conserved between influenza A isolates, error-prone transcription generates stable variant RNA during infection which could act as novel epitopes. If packaged and viable, variant genomic RNA generates an influenza quasispecies. The stable RNA variants would generate a new transmissible epitope that can select a specific repertoire, which itself should have cross-reactive properties. We tested two candidate peptides in which Thr65 is changed to Ala (A65) or Ser (S65) using recall responses to identify responding T cell clonotypes. Both peptides generated large polyclonal T cell repertoires of their own with repertoire characteristics and cross-reactivity patterns like that observed for the M158-66 repertoire. Both substitutions could be present in viral genomes or mRNA at sufficient frequency during an infection to drive immunity. Peptides from the resulting protein would be a target for CD8 cells irrespective of virus viability or transmissibility. These data support the hypothesis that cross-reactivity is important for immunity against RNA virus infections.

Management of the Patient with Multiple Food Allergies

Food allergies affect 6% of children and 3% to 4% of adults in the United States. Although several studies have examined the prevalence of food allergy, little information is available regarding the prevalence of multiple food allergies. Estimates of prevalence of people allergic to multiple foods is difficult to ascertain because those with allergy to one food may avoid additional foods for concerns related to cross-reactivity, positive tests, or prior reactions, or they may be reluctant to introduce foods known to be common allergens. Diagnosis relies on an accurate history and selective IgE testing. It is important to understand the limitations of the available tests and the role of cross-reactivity between allergens. Allergen avoidance and readily accessible emergency medications are the cornerstones of management. In addition, a multidisciplinary approach to management of individuals with multiple food allergies may be needed, as avoidance of several food groups can have nutritional, developmental, and psychosocial consequences.

A structural basis for food allergy: the role of cross-reactivity

Immunologic cross-reactivity, which is important in many aspects of host defense and immune-mediated diseases, is a prominent feature of allergic disorders. The goal of this article is to define allergenic cross-reactivity and its role in food allergy, review current understanding of mechanisms of cross-reactivity, and consider how advances in our ability to predict cross-reactivity can impact diagnosis and treatment of food allergy. Recent evidence suggests that specific T cells, in addition to IgE, developed in response to inhaled allergens can cross-react with related food allergens, leading to distinct clinical reactions. Several new cross-reactivities have been identified, including food-food, pollen-food, and latex-venom associations. Debate continues regarding prediction of allergenicity based on protein structure, and clinical relevance of in-vitro testing. Cross-reactivity is also being used to develop specific immunotherapy for treatment of food allergy. A thorough understanding of immunologic cross-reactivity is essential to advancing our knowledge about food allergy. This knowledge will help elucidate the pathogenesis of the disorder and prevent exposures to allergenic, genetically engineered foods. New insight will allow for better utilization of current diagnostic tools and the development of more accurate tests and therapies for food allergy.

The development of species-specific immunodiagnostics for Stachybotrys chartarum: The role of cross-reactivity

Mold contamination and exposure to fungi in indoor environments has been associated with various adverse health effects but little is known about the significance of individual fungal species in the initiation or exacerbation of such effects. Using Stachybotrys chartarum as a model fungus we sought to demonstrate that monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can provide species-specific diagnostic reagents and also be used to investigate immunological cross-reactivity patterns among fungi. Mice were immunized with S. chartarum spore walls and monoclonal antibodies were screened against 60 fungal species and 24 different isolates of S. chartarum using an indirect ELISA. One species-specific mAb (IgG 1) reacted only with spore preparations but not mycelium of S. chartarum or propagules of any other fungus. Five cross-reactive mAbs (IgM) documented extensive cross-reactivity among nine related Stachybotrys species and several non-related genera including several species of Cladosporium, Memnoniella, Myrothecium and Trichoderma. We also found that the ELISA reactivity for cross-reactive antigens and different isolates of S. chartarum differed considerably for normalized total amounts of mycelial antigen. We demonstrate that mAbs and immunoassays have the potential to detect S. chartarum species-specifically. The observed reactivity patterns with cross-reactive mAbs suggest that several fungi may share common antigens and that the majority of antigens are expressed by spores and mycelia. The observed cross-reactivity patterns need to be considered for accurate interpretations of environmental and serological analyses.

Role of autoantibodies in the pathogenesis and association of endocrine autoimmune disorders.

This review has focused on the nature and significance of aAB detected in the serum of patients with EAD. Although many antibodies are characteristically detected in the serum of patients with such disorders, only a few are of known pathogenic significance. Antibodies that react with soluble cytoplasmic antigens are not expected to be harmful. On the other hand, membrane or cell surface-directed antibodies are likely to be damaging, either by lysis of the cell membrane, or by reaction with hormone or other surface receptors. Clinically, measurement of aAB has important diagnostic and management value. Moreover, detection of certain antibodies before the onset of disease raises hope that the corresponding disorders may be preventable, e.g. by specific immunosuppression of those subjects, or patients, with positive tests. The possible role of aAB in the association of organ-specific AID by cross-reacting with shared epitopes in various tissues has been highlighted by the recent finding, from the authors' laboratory, of antibodies reactive with a 64-kDa membrane protein found in several tissues, including thyroid, eye muscle, and pancreas, which are frequent sites for autoimmune inflammation. Study of such antibodies and the molecular characterization of the corresponding antigens in the various involved tissues should provide information concerning the role of cross-reactivity in autoimmunity as well as leading to the development of specific immunotherapeutic agents.