Role Of Breast-conserving Surgery Research Articles

Breast Conserving Surgery Post Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma in a Developing Country: Is It Safe?

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is the standard treatment for early breast cancer and has similar survival with mastectomy. The role of BCS in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), is controversial. Surgeons, especially in developing countries, fear higher margin involvement and local recurrence (LR) in BCS. The aim of this study was to determine the LR in BCS compared to mastectomy in LABC post NACT and to ascertain the percentage of involved surgical margins following both methods of surgery. This was a retrospective study of breast cancer patients seen in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC). All patients had NACT followed by either mastectomy or BCS. The patients with Her2 enriched carcinomas did not have access to targeted therapy (Trastuzumab or Pertuzumab). The patients with ill-defined tumours underwent ultrasound assessment in the surgical clinics. All had post-operative radiotherapy. All with ER or PR positive cancers were given Tamoxifen for a minimum of 5 years. This study demonstrated that BCS post NACT was safe to be performed in selected patients with LABC in a developing country.

Locally advanced breast cancer: breast-conserving surgery and other factors linked to overall survival after neoadjuvant treatment.

Recent data suggest that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) may positively impact overall survival (OS) in early breast cancer. However, the role of BCS in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains uncertain. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 530 LABC patients who underwent surgery after NAT between 2010 and 2015. Outcomes examined included OS, distant recurrence rates (DRR), and loco-regional recurrence rates (LRRs). Among the 927 breast cancer patients who received NAT, 530 were eligible for our study. Of these, 24.6% underwent BCS, while 75.4% underwent mastectomy (MS). The median follow-up duration was 79 months. BCS patients exhibited a higher pathological complete response (PCR) rate compared to those who underwent MS (22.3% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). The 6-year OS rates for BCS and MS were 81.5% and 62%, respectively (p < 0.000). In multivariate OS analysis, MS was associated with worse outcomes (OR 1.678; 95% CI 1.069-2.635; p = 0.024), as was body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.031; 95% CI 1.006-1.058; p = 0.017), and stage IIIB or IIIC (OR 2.450; 95% CI 1.561-3.846; p < 0.000). Conversely, PCR (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.220-0.801; p = 0.008) was associated with improved survival. DRR was significantly lower in BCS (15.4%) compared to MS (36.8%) (OR 0.298; 95% CI 0.177-0.504). LRRs were comparable between BCS (9.2%) and MS (9.5%) (OR 0.693; 95% CI 0.347-1.383). Our findings suggest that BCS is oncologically safe, even for patients with large lesions, and is associated with superior OS rates compared to MS. Additionally, lower BMI, lower pretreatment stage, and achieving PCR were associated with improved survival outcomes.

Surgical Management of Inherited Breast Cancer: Role of Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Simple SummaryWhich should be the optimal surgical approach to breast cancer in the presence of high penetrance gene mutation represents a current clinical and scientific issue, lively debated and studied. Does inherited breast cancer always mean bilateral mastectomy? Scientific research is questioning the oncological safety of a conservative surgical approach in hereditary breast cancer. The present narrative review aims to explore the scientific panorama on this faceted and significant theme.Recent studies have demonstrated that hereditary breast cancer (BC) has a prevalence of 5–10% among all BC diagnoses. Nowadays, significant technological advances in the identification of an increasingly broad spectrum of genetic mutations allow for the discovery of an ever-growing number of inherited pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants of breast cancer susceptibility genes. As the management of BC patients carrying mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes or other high-penetrance genes is currently a challenge, extensive research is being carried out and a lively scientific debate has been taking place on what the most appropriate local therapy, especially surgical treatment, of patients with inherited BC should be. In many studies, BC outcomes in BRCA carriers and non-carriers have been compared. A number of them showed that, when compared with mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery in BRCA patients is oncologically safe in terms of overall survival, although an increased risk of ipsilateral recurrence was reported. In these patients, devising a specific therapeutic strategy is an inevitably complex process, as it must take into consideration a series of factors, require a multimodal approach, guarantee personalization, strictly adhere to scientific international guidelines, and consider all available evidence. The present narrative review purposes to identify and illustrate evidence from significant selected studies that discussed those issues, as well as to suggest useful tools to clinicians managing this specific clinical condition in daily clinical practice.

Role of Breast-Conserving Surgery on the National Health System Economy From and to SARS-COVID-19 Era.

Day surgery breast-conserving surgery (DS-BCS) is a surgical approach applied in many specialized breast surgery departments. This study demonstrates the benefits of this approach from the perspectives of patients and of the Hospital/National Health System compared to ordinary breast-conserving surgery (ORD-BCS) under general anesthetic. A comparison of costs and diagnosis-related group (DRG) reimbursement demonstrated improved cost-effectiveness in DS-BCS compared to ORD-BCS.

The Role Of Breast-Conserving Surgery In The Treatment Of Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Objective: In the treatment of early-stage breast cancer, breast-conserving surgical treatment has been increasingly used. In our study, we investigated the survival efficacy in the long-term follow-up of breast-conserving surgical treatment in patients without axillary lymph node metastasis.&#x0D; Method: Thirty-nine patients without axillary lymph node metastasis who had undergone surgery for infiltrating ductal breast cancer between 2009 and 2018 were recordedin the research. Of these patients, 23 (58.9%) undergo MRM (modified radical mastectomy)and 16 (41.0%) undergo BCS (breast-conserving surgery). All of the patients who underwent BCS were given radiotherapy, and the patients with T2 and T3 tumors in two groups were given adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonotherapy according to receptor status. The patients were followed up by physical examination and imaging methods every three months in the first two years and then every six months.&#x0D; Results: All patients were followed up during the study (6 - 96 months). There was not variations between the 2 groups in terms of patient age, tumor localization, menopausal status, and the number of lymph nodes dissected. Local recurrence was detected in 1 (6.2%) patient who underwent BCS and was treated with a total mastectomy. In another patient, lung and liver metastases were detected in the 7th year. Infiltrative ductal carcinoma of the contralateral breast was detected in 3 (13%) patients who underwent MRM between 12-24 months. No patients were lost in either group.&#x0D; Conclusion: In patients with early breast cancer, BCS was found to be disease-free and as safe as MRM surgeries for overall survival.

Locoregional therapy of locally advanced breast cancer: a clinical practice guideline.

In female patients with locally advanced breast cancer (labc) and good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nact), including endocrine therapy, what is the role of breast-conserving surgery (bcs) compared with mastectomy?In female patients with labc, is radiotherapy (rt) indicated for those who have undergone mastectomy?does locoregional rt, compared with breast or chest wall rt alone, result in a higher survival rate and lower recurrence rates?is rt indicated for those achieving a pathologic complete response (pcr) to nact?In female patients with labc who receive nact, is the most appropriate axillary staging procedure sentinel lymph node biopsy (slnb) or axillary dissection? Is slnb indicated before nact rather than at the time of surgery?How should female patients with labc that does not respond to initial nact be treated? This guideline was developed by Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc) and the Breast Cancer Disease Site Group (dsg). A systematic review was prepared based on literature searches conducted using the medline and embase databases for the period 1996 to December 11, 2013. Guidelines were located from that search and from the Web sites of major guideline organizations. The working group drafted recommendations based on the systemic review. The systematic review and recommendations were then circulated to the Breast Cancer dsg and the pebc Report Approval Panel for internal review; the revised document underwent external review. The full three-part evidence series can be found on the Cancer Care Ontario Web site. For most patients with labc, modified radical mastectomy should be considered the standard of care. For some patients with noninflammatory labc, bcs can be considered on a case-by-case basis when the surgeon deems that the disease can be fully resected and the patient expresses a strong preference for breast preservation.For patients with labc, rt after mastectomy is recommended.It is recommended that, after bcs or mastectomy, patients with labc receive locoregional rt encompassing the breast or chest wall and local node-bearing areas.It is recommended that postoperative rt remain the standard of care for patients with labc who achieve pcr to nact.It is recommended that axillary dissection remain the standard of care for axillary staging in labc, with the judicious use of slnb in patients who are advised of the limitations of the current data.Although slnb either before or after nact is technically feasible, the data are insufficient to make any recommendation about the optimal timing of slnb with respect to nact. Limited data suggest higher sentinel lymph node identification rates and lower false negative identification rates when slnb is conducted before nact; however, those data must be balanced against the requirement for two operations if slnb is not performed at the time of resection of the main tumour.It is recommended that patients receiving neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based therapy (or other sequential regimens) whose tumours do not respond to the initial agent or agents, or who experience disease progression, be expedited to the next agent or agents of the regimen.For patients who, in the opinion of the treating physician, fail to respond or progress on first-line nact, several therapeutic options can be considered, including second-line chemotherapy, hormonal therapy (if appropriate), rt, or immediate surgery (if technically feasible). Treatment should be individualized through discussion at a multidisciplinary case conference, considering tumour characteristics, patient factors and preferences, and risk of adverse effects.It is recommended that prospective randomized clinical trials be designed for patients with labc who fail to respond to nact so that more definitive treatment recommendations can be developed.

Surgical management of lobular carcinoma from a national screening program: A retrospective analysis

ObjectiveTo compare the surgical outcomes of women diagnosed with invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma of the breast. BackgroundThe role of Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) for invasive cancers of the breast is well established; however its role for invasive lobular carcinoma is less well defined. Concerns exist regarding the need for re-excision of margins and the eventual need for mastectomy in women with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC) compared with Ductal Carcinoma (IDC). In this study we compare the surgical results of these two groups examining BCS from a national breast cancer screening program. MethodsAnalysis of mammographically detected ILC and IDC tumours obtained from the national breast cancer screening program of the Republic of Ireland (BreastCheck) was performed. BreastCheck offers biannual screening mammograms to women throughout the Republic of Ireland between 50 and 65 years of age. We examined and pooled the data across 4 screening zones from 2005 to 2010. ConclusionsWe observed similar success rates and trends in both the ILC and IDC groups where BCS was attempted. Patients selected for BCS with ILC were statistically more likely to have successful surgery compared with IDC as tumour size increased. There however was no statistical difference in a pooled analysis of successful treatment across all tumour sizes in comparing the two groups. We conclude that BCS is an appropriate and acceptable treatment option for women diagnosed with ILC.

Factors associated with surgical management following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the NeoALTTO phase III trial

BackgroundThe NeoALTTO trial showed that dual HER2 blockade nearly doubles the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer. However, this did not translate into a higher rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Patients and methodsIn NeoALTTO, patients with HER2-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either trastuzumab, lapatinib or their combination with paclitaxel before surgery with pCR as the primary end point. We investigated the association between the surgery type and clinicopathological factors and response to treatment, adjusting for the treatment arm. ResultsFour hundred and twenty-nine patients were subjected to breast surgery. Two hundred and forty-two (56%) and 187 (44%) patients underwent mastectomy and BCS, respectively. In a logistic regression model, negative estrogen receptor (ER), multicentricity and the presence of a palpable mass before surgery were significantly associated with a low chance of BCS. Conversely, patients with small tumors and those eligible for BCS at diagnosis were managed more with BCS, independent of the treatment arm. Radiological response was not associated with the surgical decision. ConclusionsTumor characteristics before neoadjuvant therapy play a main role in deciding the type of surgery calling for a clear consensus on the role of BCS in patients responding to neoadjuvant therapy.

Extending the role of breast-conserving surgery by immediate volume replacement

Cosmetic failure following breast-conserving surgery is commonly caused by volume loss, and the effect of immediate volume replacement on cosmetic outcome using a latissimus dorsi miniflap (LDMF) has been investigated. The technique avoids a frontal scar and allows a wide retromammary excision via a lateral approach. Twenty patients who had LDMF reconstruction were compared with 38 who had wide local excision (WLE) without reconstruction between 1991 and 1994. Cosmetic outcome was judged using (1) breast retraction assessment and (2) panel assessment, recording the frequency of cosmetic failure. Patients who had LDMF reconstruction were younger (mean 45.1 versus 58.6 years; P < 0.0001) with larger tumours (mean 2.5 versus 1.3 cm; P < 0.0001) and underwent wider specimen excision (57 versus 13 per cent more than 150 g; P = 0.004) with reduced margin involvement (10 versus 37 per cent positive margins; P = 0.03) compared with those who had WLE. Cosmetic failure was uncommon after immediate volume replacement (LDMF 10 per cent versus WLE 34 per cent; P = 0.045). LDMF reconstruction extends the role of breast-conserving surgery without cosmetic penalties, and may reduce the need for mastectomy.

Statistical Interaction in the Survival Analysis of Early Breast Cancer using Registry Data: Role of Breast Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy

To identify subgroup effects that might influence the survival results of postoperative radiotherapy. Women selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, aged 40-69 years, with non-metastasized T1-T2 breast carcinoma, in whom axillary lymph node dissection was performed. Subgroup analyses were performed using proportional hazards models with interactions. Joint significance of subgroups was evaluated with the Wald test. Event was death from any cause. Statistically significant interactions were found between type of surgery (breast-conserving [BCS] or mastectomy [ME]), radiotherapy [RT], T stage, and extent of nodal involvement, but not between treatments and nodal examination. For each treatment combination, ME-no RT, ME+RT, BCS-no RT, BCS+RT, the mortality hazard ratios were respectively: 1, 1.12, 1.11, 0.78 in T1, 0-3 positive nodes; 2.45, 2.77, 2.71, 1.92 in T2, 4+ nodes; 1.31, 1.38, 1.33, 1.19 in T2, 0-3+ nodes; and 3.41, 2.79, 3.44, 2.40 in T2, 4+ nodes. The corresponding joint tests showed: in the absence of radiotherapy, no significant survival disadvantage for breast-conserving surgery vs mastectomy; with radiotherapy, significant survival advantage for breast-conserving surgery irrespective of stage and for mastectomy in T2, 4+ nodes. For mastectomy in less advanced stages receiving radiotherapy, excess breast cancer deaths suggested undocumented adverse selection. The corresponding result was considered inconclusive. The analyses found subgroup effects that should be taken into account to interpret treatment results in breast cancer.

Recent trends in breast reconstruction.

The rising popularity of breast reconstruction is closely linked to patient expectation, improved techniques and a better understanding of the risks and benefits of reconstructive procedures. Innovative new approaches can conceal the scars of mastectomy and extend the role of breast-conserving surgery, leading to improved outcomes.