Role Of Laparoscopic Surgery Research Articles

The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of urinary lithiasis in the era of endourology in Mexico

The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of urinary lithiasis in the era of endourology in Mexico

Role of laparoscopic surgery in managing hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patients: a single level I trauma center, propensity score matching study.

The role of laparoscopy in the treatment and diagnosis of penetrating thoraco-abdominal injury has been established. However, there is no clear consensus on the role of laparoscopy in blunt injury due to numerous reasons, such as concerns of missed injury and technical problems in treating various abdominal organs. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopy and evaluate its safety in managing blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. The medical records and Korean Trauma Data Base (KTDB) of patients who underwent abdominal surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 at a single level I center were collected. Patients were classified into a laparoscopy group and a laparotomy group. The laparoscopy groups were matched 1:1 with the laparotomy group by using propensity score matching (PSM). Patient demographics, injured organ and its grade, operative procedure, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups. After propensity score matching, 128 patients were included. There was no significant imbalance in demographics between the two groups except sex. Injured organ and its grade showed no significant differences between the two groups except for the incidence of omentum. Small bowel and mesenteric repair were performed most often in both groups. Splenectomy, pancreatic surgery, duodenectomy, and liver resection were performed exclusively in the laparotomy group. Severe postoperative complication rate (3% vs. 20%: p = 0.004), length of stay in ICU (3.3 ± 3.2 days vs. 4.6 ± 3.7; p = 0.046), and operation time (93.9 ± 47.7min vs. 112.8 ± 57.7; p = 0.046) were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group. The conversion rate was about 16%. There was no missed injury. In hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patients who sustained penetrating or blunt injury, laparoscopy is feasible and safe as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in selected cohort of abdominal trauma.

Is laparoscopic surgery safe and feasible in acute adhesive ileus?

Although the classical surgical treatment of adhesive ileus is performed using the open method, laparoscopic surgery has recently been performed in some centers. This study aimed to discuss the feasibility and role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction. In this retrospective study, the data of 830 patients who were operated for ileus in Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Hospital, Department of General Surgery between January 2011 and September 2022 were analyzed. Missing data and intraabdominal cancer-related ileus were accepted as exclusion criteria and 648 patients were excluded from the study. The development of adhesion-related ileus and completeness of the data were accepted as inclusion criteria. Data were compared between the 2 groups [open group (OG; 152 cases) and laparoscopic group (LG; 30 cases]). When the patient characteristics were evaluated, it was found that the history of previous abdominal surgery (P < .001) and the number of previous abdominal surgery (P < .001) were statistically significantly higher in OG. Operation time was significantly longer in the LG (P = .022). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of intraoperative bowel injury (P = .216), bowel resection (P = .284), and stoma creation (P = .331). OG had a significantly higher rate of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 serious complications (P < .001) and mortality rate (P = .045). The first gas out occurred significantly earlier in the LG (P = .014). Oral intake was initiated earlier in the LG (P = .004). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LG (P < .001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of postoperative ileus, readmission, and reoperation. Laparoscopic surgery can be safely performed for the treatment of selected patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. In addition, it is advantageous in terms of postoperative recovery.

Role of laparoscopic surgery in gynecology.

Objective: Technological advancements extend the range of indications for gynecological laparoscopy. We are presenting the outcome of our experiences with gynaecological laparoscopies and assessed rate, indications, complications and its benefits in a teaching hospital. Study Design: Retrospective Observational study. Setting: MTI Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar. Period: January 2021 to December 2021. Material &amp; Methods: we performed laparoscopic procedure for a total of 222 patients and all were included in the study. Laparoscopic surgeries were performed under general anesthesia. Successful creation of the pneumoperitoneum was done with the help of Veress needle, mostly by closed access technique and occasionally with the open method. Secondary ports were introduced under direct vision. After completing the surgery laparoscope and secondary ports were removed under direct vision to minimize any iatrogenic insult. Results: During the study period, 908 major gynaecological operations including 222 laparoscopies were performed. This gave the rate of 24.45% laparoscopies per 100 operations. Diagnostic laparoscopies were performed in 195 (87.84%) cases and operative were in 27 (12.16%) cases. Complications were only in 5 of the cases, two being of major nature. A ureteric ligation occurred during laparoscopic hysterectomy resulting in conversion of laparoscopic surgeries into open surgery and another was during cystectomy due to excessive bleeding. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery propounds unique benefits including definite diagnosis, mobilization and speedy recovery, minimal complications, less cost and shorter hospital stay. In young patients, laparoscopy helps in preserving their fertility with better prognosis in contrast to open surgery.

The role of laparoscopic surgery in the surgical management of recurrent liver malignancies: Asystematic review and meta-analysis.

To evaluate the efficiency of laparoscopic surgery in treating recurrent liver tumors vs. conventional open surgery. Database searching was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE. Rev Man 5.3 software and Stata 13.0 software were applied in statistical analyses. A total of fourteen studies were finally included with 1,284 patients receiving LRH and 2,254 with ORH. LRH was associated with less intraoperative hemorrhage, a higher R0 resection rate, a lower incidence of Pringle Maneuver, a lower incidence of postoperative morbidities, a better overall survival and an enhanced postoperative recovery vs. ORH. Patients receiving LRH shared similar operative time, tumor number and disease-free survival as those with ORH. However, tumor size was relatively larger in patients receiving ORH and major hepatectomy, anatomic hepatectomy were rarely performed in patients with LRH. Additional analyses between LRH and laparoscopic primary hepatectomy revealed less intraoperative blood loss in patients with LRH. LRH is safe and feasible with more favorable peri-operative outcomes and faster postoperative recovery. However, it is only applicable for some highly-selected cases not requiring complex surgical procedures. Future larger well-designed studies are expected for further validation.

The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of appendiceal and small bowel Neuroendocrine tumours

The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of appendiceal and small bowel Neuroendocrine tumours

Medical Adhesives and Their Role in Laparoscopic Surgery-A Review of Literature.

Laparoscopic surgery is undergoing rapid development. Replacing the traditional method of joining cut tissues with sutures or staples could greatly simplify and speed up laparoscopic procedures. This alternative could undoubtedly be adhesives. For decades, scientists have been working on a material to bond tissues together to create the best possible conditions for tissue regeneration. The results of research on tissue adhesives achieved over the past years show comparable treatment effects to traditional methods. Tissue adhesives are a good alternative to surgical sutures in wound closure. This article is a review of the most important groups of tissue adhesives including their properties and possible applications. Recent reports on the development of biological adhesives are also discussed.

Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundPerforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a common emergency condition requiring surgery using laparoscopy or open repair of the perforated site. The aim of this study was to assess the role of laparoscopic surgery (LS) based on the safety and efficacy for PPU.MethodsMedical records of the consecutive patients who underwent LS or open surgery (OS) for PPU at five hospitals between January 2009 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. After propensity score matching, short-term perioperative outcomes were compared between LS and OS in selected patients.ResultsAmong the 598 patients included in the analysis, OS was more frequently performed in patients with worse factors, including older age, a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, more alcohol use, longer symptom duration, a higher Boey score, a higher serum C-reactive protein level, a lower serum albumin level, and a larger-diameter perforated site. After propensity score matching, 183 patients were included in each group; variables were well-balanced between-groups. Postoperative complications were not different between groups (24.6% LS group vs. 31.7% OS group, p = 0.131). However, postoperative length of hospital stay (10.03 vs. 12.53 days, respectively, p = 0.003) and postoperative time to liquid intake (3.75 vs. 5.26 days, p < 0.001) were shorter in the LS group.ConclusionsLS resulted in better functional recovery than OS and can be safely performed for treatment of PPU. When performed by experienced surgeons, LS is an alternative option, even for hemodynamically unstable patients.

Effect of the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Curriculum on Skills of Operating Room Technology Students: An Interventional Study

Background: In a laparoscopic surgery team, a surgical technologist as a skillful assistant surgeon is responsible for camera navigation and peg transfer. Objectives: We assessed the effect of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery curriculum on improving the skills of surgical technology students in camera navigation, pattern cutting, and peg transfer. Methods: A study was conducted on 30 surgical technology students at the Iran University of Medical Sciences based on Kern's six-step model. After assessing the needs and defining the educational goals, the course content was determined. Afterward, students were trained in a simulation-based learning environment. Then, in the evaluation stage, using the standard task completion time (TCT) tool, their competence in performing the three skills was evaluated. The results of the first comprehensive attempt to perform each skill were recorded as the pretest, and the results of the sixth and 10th repetitions were recorded as the posttest. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance with duplicate data. Results: The TCT score improved in this study. The time of camera navigation decreased from 92.14 to 56.42 s, pattern cutting from 186.07 to 118.21 s, and peg transfer from 93.03 to 54.10 s. Conclusions: This study showed that the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery curriculum improved the surgical technologists’ competence in performing triple skills essential for performing laparoscopic surgeries. Thus, this learning method could play an essential role in laparoscopic surgery.

The Role of Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

The aim of this review is to investigate and compare all laparoscopic techniques that can be used in the surgical repair of advanced uterine prolapse. A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases was performed for articles published up to December 2020, reporting data on the treatment of severe uterine prolapse using laparoscopic procedures. Only studies in the English language, with a patient sample of ≥20 and a follow-up time of ≥12 months were included. The final synthesis of this review consisted of six studies. The main laparoscopic procedures reported were vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, vaginally assisted laparoscopic uterine sacropexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation, and laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension combined with trachelectomy. All procedures involved mesh placement, except for laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension. All procedures reported anatomical cure rates > 90%. Vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy had the largest amount of intraoperative blood loss whilst vaginally assisted laparoscopic uterine sacropexy was associated with bladder injuries intraoperatively. All vaginally assisted procedures reported cases of mesh extrusion postoperatively. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension was the operation with the longest mean operative and hospitalization time. Conversions were not reported. The present study shows that minimally invasive surgery can be used efficiently as an alternative to open surgery in the treatment of severe uterine prolapse.

The role of laparoscopic surgery in repeat ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.

Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred approach for primary uncomplicated ileocolic resection (ICR); however, its role for repeat resections is unclear. This study assessed the outcomes of primary and repeated ICRs for Crohn's disease to examine rates of laparoscopy and patient morbidity. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted at a tertiary centre between 2013 and 2019. All patients undergoing ICRs for Crohn's disease were included. The cohort was divided into three groups based on number of resections-primary (1R), secondary (2R) and tertiary or more (>2R) groups. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative morbidity. Over a 6-year period, 474 patients underwent ICR for Crohn's disease, including 369 primary (1R, 77.8%) and 105 repeat (≥2R, 22.2%) resections. A laparoscopic approach was less common in the ≥2R versus 1R groups (79.0% vs. 93.8%, P<0.001), but rates of conversion to an open procedure were comparable. Morbidity was higher amongst repeat resections although this was not significant (20.0% vs. 14.1%, P=0.18). Amongst cases approached laparoscopically (n=429), rates of conversion and postoperative morbidity did not differ by stage of resection, although operative time was longer for repeat operations. Even in the group undergoing laparoscopy for tertiary or greater resections (>2R, n=29), the rates of conversion (10%) and morbidity (14%) were relatively low. In this contemporary series of primary and reoperative ICR for ileal CD, a laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe for the majority of repeat ICRs when performed at a high volume centre.

Role of Laparoscopic Surgery in the Management Liver Abscess: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Role of Laparoscopic Surgery in the Management Liver Abscess: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Role of Laparoscopic Surgery in Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis: Review Article

Endometriosis is a progressive medical condition that affects reproductive-aged women, usually presenting with pelvic pain and infertility. The deep infiltrative endometriosis, infiltrating the peritoneum of more than 5 mm, is found by pathology to be an active disease that involves the uterosacral ligaments, the retro-cervical area, the rectovaginal septum, the rectum, the vagina, and the bladder. The choice of therapy depends on the presentation and severity of the symptoms, the extended location of endometriotic lesions, and the fertility need. Laparoscopic surgery is a standard of clinical care for women with deep infiltrative endometriosis-related bowel endometriosis, severe pelvic pain, and infertility. Nevertheless, pre-operative mapping of the disease is difficult for accuracy planning, with bowel and urinary tract injuries being the major concern of surgical treatments. Thereby, a multidisciplinary laparoscopic approach, with radical laparoscopic surgery, plays an essential role for the treatment of deep infiltrative endometriosis. Keywords: Deep infiltrative endometriosis, Endometriosis, Laparoscopy, Laparoscopic surgery

International guidelines and recommendations for surgery during Covid-19 pandemic: A Systematic Review.

BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical departments were forced to re-schedule their activity giving priority to urgent procedures and non-deferrable oncological cases. There is a lack of evidence-based literature providing clinical and organizational guidelines for the management of a general surgery department. Aim of our study was to review the available recommendations published by general Surgery Societies and Health Institutions and evaluate the underlying Literature.Materials and methodsA review of the English Literature was conducted according to the AMSTAR and to the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.ResultsAfter eligibility assessment, a total of 22 papers and statements were analyzed. Surgical societies have established criteria for triage and prioritization in order to identify procedures that can be postponed after the pandemic and those that should not. Prioritization among oncologic cases represents a difficult task: clinicians have to balance a possible delay in cancer diagnosis or treatment against the risk for a potential COVID-19 exposure. There is broad agreement among guidelines that indication to proceed with surgery should be discussed in virtual Tumor Boards taking into consideration alternative therapeutic approaches. Several guidelines deal with the role of laparoscopic surgery during the pandemic: a tailored approach is currently suggested, with a case-by-case evaluation provided that appropriate personal protective equipment is available in order to minimize the potential risk of transmission. Finally, there is a considerable agreement in the published Literature concerning the management of the personnel during the peri- and intraoperative phase and on the technical advices regarding the induction, operative and recover maneuvers in COVID-19 cases.ConclusionsDuring COVID-19 pandemic, it is of paramount importance to face the emergency in the most effective and efficient manner, retrieving resources from non-essential settings and, at the same time, providing care to high priority non-COVID-19 related diseases.

Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an updated systematic review.

The role of laparoscopic surgery (Lap) and robotic surgery (Rob) for radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is not clear. We summarized the safety and feasibility of Lap and Rob for HC. A search of all HC studies in English published on PubMed up to April 2020 was conducted. References from retrieved articles were reviewed to broaden the search. In total, 23 reports were enrolled: 15 involving Lap, seven using Rob and one study reporting a minimally invasive approach (Lap or Rob, not specified). A total of 205 cases of HC were documented (Lap/Rob/not specified, 99/101/5): 37 cases of Bismuth type-I (Lap/Rob, 17/20), 22 cases of Bismuth type-II (Lap/Rob, 15/7), 68 cases of type-III (Lap/Rob, 39/29) and 13 cases of type-IV (Lap/Rob, 9/4). The pooled prevalence of R0 resection was 80.1% (Lap/Rob, 85.9%/71.0%). The weighted mean for operative time, blood loss and post-operative hospital stay was 458.4 min (Lap/Rob, 423.3/660.8 min), 615.3 mL (Lap/Rob, 521.0/1188.5 mL) and 14.0 days (Lap/Rob, 14.0/13.7 days), respectively. The pooled prevalence of conversion to open surgery, post-operative complications, and perioperative mortality was 9.1% (Lap/Rob, 12.2%/3.8%), 47.2% (Lap/Rob, 38.4%/61.3%) and 3.0% (Lap/Rob, 4.0%/2.0%), respectively. With innovations in technology and gradual accumulation of surgical experience, the feasibility and safety of performing Lap and Rob for HC will improve.

Role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of renal tumors

Role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of renal tumors

Adrenal tumours: open surgery versus minimally invasive surgery.

The aim of this article is to focus on state-of-the-art minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) and the most recent role of open adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours, respect to MIA and open adrenalectomy for adrenocortical cancer (ACC). The laparoscopic (both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal) approach is the first-choice treatment in cases of small-to-medium benign adrenal tumours. This approach is feasible and well tolerated even for larger lesions without radiological signs of malignancy. Robotic adrenalectomy has recently increased in popularity, although the results appear to be fully comparable with those of laparoscopy. Open approach is the keystone of ACC surgery, especially when neighbour tissues, organs, or vessels are involved. Recent evidence suggests caution in treating localized ACC with laparoscopy, because of the higher rate of local or peritoneal recurrence, and shorter recurrence-free survival rates with respect to open adrenalectomy. MIA has progressively replaced the traditional open approach and plays a complementary role in the treatment of adrenal tumour. It is the first option for benign lesions, whereas open adrenalectomy is a cornerstone treatment for ACC. The overlap of indications for laparoscopic adrenalectomy and open adrenalectomy is today confined to the treatment of organ-confined adrenal cancer, in which the role of laparoscopic surgery is far from being clearly defined.

Laparoscopic Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction Improves Postoperative Outcomes: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BackgroundMinimally invasive resection for upper gastrointestinal tumors has been associated with favorable results. However, the role of laparoscopic surgery (LS) in the multimodal treatment of patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction needs further investigation. MethodsClinicopathological data of patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2005 and 2017 were assessed. Outcomes of patients undergoing LS were compared with those of patients treated with a conventional open resection (OR) using a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis. ResultsCurative resection for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction was performed in 417 patients during the study period. Beginning in June 2014, the majority of patients underwent LS (n = 72) and they were matched with 72 patients who were treated with an OR. The majority of patients treated with LS (89%) had advanced cancer (UICC stages II and III) and 82% of them received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. LS was significantly associated with a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (26 (9–62) vs. 21 (4–46), P = .007), a lower 90-day major complication rate (13 vs. 26%, P = .035), and a lower length of hospital stay (14 vs. 16 days, P = .001). After a median follow-up time of 32 months, 1-year overall survival rate was higher after LS than after OR (93 vs. 74%, P = .126); however, results did not reach statistical significance. ConclusionLS for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction is feasible and significantly reduces major postoperative morbidity resulting in a reduced length of hospital stay. Therefore, LS should be preferably considered for the curative treatment of patients with these malignancies.

Role of Laparoscopic Surgery in the Current Management of Mirizzi Syndrome

Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is an uncommon complication of cholelithiasis caused by extrinsic biliary compression by stones in the gallbladder infundibulum or cystic duct. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes associated with a laparoscopic approach to this disease process. This is a 10-year, retrospective study conducted at two academic medical centers with established acute care surgery practices. Patients with a diagnosis of MS confirmed intraoperatively were included. Eighty-eight patients with MS were identified with 55 (62.5%) being type 1. Twenty six (29.5%) patients, all type 1, underwent successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Of the 62 patients that underwent open cholecystectomy, 27.3 per cent had a laparoscopy converted to open procedure. There was no significant difference in overall complications (19.2 vs 29%) among those undergoing laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Length of stay was lower in patients that had a laparoscopic approach (P = 0.001). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can safely be attempted in type 1 MS and seems to be associated with fewer overall complications and shorter length of stay compared with an open approach.

Feasibility and Usefulness of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder (Soloassist) in Laparoscopic Surgery

Introduction: The Soloassist® system is a joystick-guided robotic scope holder. We evaluated the efficacy of Soloassist in laparoscopic surgery. Methods: We investigated operative time, blood loss, set-up time, length of hospital stay, and the number of participating surgeons in laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases before and after the introduction of Soloassist. Furthermore, we evaluated these factors in each group of 20 elective and emergency cholecystectomy cases by single surgeon after matching their background. To evaluate the performance level of operating Soloassist, we divided the operative field into three areas. Then we counted the frequency of energy device activation in initially 10 cases by a single surgical resident and observed its change. Results: The number of participating surgeons was significantly less and postoperative hospital days were fewer in the Soloassist group. There was no significant difference between set-up time and blood loss both in elective and emergency cases. The total number of energy device activations and that in the dangerous area decreased in accordance with the experience. Conclusion: Considering our results and previous reports, the combination use of an ideal active scope holder and a commercially available 3D scope is currently considered the best approach in laparoscopic surgery. In the near future, development of active scope holders might play an important role in laparoscopic surgery.