Rod Amacrine Cells Research Articles

Functional NMDA receptors are expressed by both AII and A17 amacrine cells in the rod pathway of the mammalian retina.

At many glutamatergic synapses, non-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) and NMDA receptors are coexpressed postsynaptically. In the mammalian retina, glutamatergic rod bipolar cells are presynaptic to two rod amacrine cells (AII and A17) that constitute dyad postsynaptic partners opposite each presynaptic active zone. Whereas there is strong evidence for expression of non-NMDA receptors by both AII and A17 amacrines, the expression of NMDA receptors by the pre- and postsynaptic neurons in this microcircuit has not been resolved. In this study, using patch-clamp recording from visually identified cells in rat retinal slices, we investigated the expression and functional properties of NMDA receptors in these cells with a combination of pharmacological and biophysical methods. Pressure application of NMDA did not evoke a response in rod bipolar cells, but for both AII and A17 amacrines, NMDA evoked responses that were blocked by a competitive antagonist (CPP) applied extracellularly and an open channel blocker (MK-801) applied intracellularly. NMDA-evoked responses also displayed strong Mg(2+)-dependent voltage block and were independent of gap junction coupling. With low-frequency application (60-s intervals), NMDA-evoked responses remained stable for up to 50 min, but with higher-frequency stimulation (10- to 20-s intervals), NMDA responses were strongly and reversibly suppressed. We observed strong potentiation when NMDA was applied in nominally Ca(2+)-free extracellular solution, potentially reflecting Ca(2+)-dependent NMDA receptor inactivation. These results indicate that expression of functional (i.e., conductance-increasing) NMDA receptors is common to both AII and A17 amacrine cells and suggest that these receptors could play an important role for synaptic signaling, integration, or plasticity in the rod pathway.

Adaptation to Background Light Enables Contrast Coding at Rod Bipolar Cell Synapses

Rod photoreceptors contribute to vision over an ∼ 6-log-unit range of light intensities. The wide dynamic range of rod vision is thought to depend upon light intensity-dependent switching between two parallel pathways linking rods to ganglion cells: a rod → rod bipolar (RB) cell pathway that operates at dim backgrounds and a rod → cone → cone bipolar cell pathway that operates at brighter backgrounds. We evaluated this conventional model of rod vision by recording rod-mediated light responses from ganglion and AII amacrine cells and by recording RB-mediated synaptic currents from AII amacrine cells in mouse retina. Contrary to the conventional model, we found that the RB pathway functioned at backgrounds sufficient to activate the rod → cone pathway. As background light intensity increased, the RB's role changed from encoding the absorption of single photons to encoding contrast modulations around mean luminance. This transition is explained by the intrinsic dynamics of transmission from RB synapses.

Deterministic or Stochastic Choices in Retinal Neuron Specification

There are two views on vertebrate retinogenesis: a deterministic model dependent on fixed lineages and a stochastic model in which choices of division modes and cell fates cannot be predicted. In this issue of Neuron, He etal. (2012) address this question in zebrafish using live imaging and mathematical modeling.

Intrinsic properties and functional circuitry of the AII amacrine cell

Amacrine cells represent the most diverse class of retinal neuron, comprising dozens of distinct cell types. Each type exhibits a unique morphology and generates specific visual computations through its synapses with a subset of excitatory interneurons (bipolar cells), other amacrine cells, and output neurons (ganglion cells). Here, we review the intrinsic and network properties that underlie the function of the most common amacrine cell in the mammalian retina, the AII amacrine cell. The AII connects rod and cone photoreceptor pathways, forming an essential link in the circuit for rod-mediated (scotopic) vision. As such, the AII has become known as the rod-amacrine cell. We, however, now understand that AII function extends to cone-mediated (photopic) vision, and AII function in scotopic and photopic conditions utilizes the same underlying circuit: AIIs are electrically coupled to each other and to the terminals of some types of ON cone bipolar cells. The direction of signal flow, however, varies with illumination. Under photopic conditions, the AII network constitutes a crossover inhibition pathway that allows ON signals to inhibit OFF ganglion cells and contributes to motion sensitivity in certain ganglion cell types. We discuss how the AII's combination of intrinsic and network properties accounts for its unique role in visual processing.

Expression of Alpha 7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors by Bipolar, Amacrine, and Ganglion Cells of the Rabbit Retina

Cholinergic agents affect the light responses of many ganglion cells (GCs) in the mammalian retina by activating nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). Whereas retinal neurons that express beta2 subunit-containing nAChRs have been characterized in the rabbit retina, expression patterns of other nAChR subtypes remain unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the expression of alpha7 nAChRs in retinal neurons by means of single-, double-, and triple-label immunohistochemistry. Our data demonstrate that, in the rabbit retina, several types of bipolar cells, amacrine cells, and cells in the GC layer express alpha7 nAChRs. At least three different populations of cone bipolar cells exhibited alpha7 labeling, whereas glycine-immunoreactive amacrine cells comprised the majority of alpha7-positive amacrine cells. Some GABAergic amacrine cells also displayed alpha7 immunoreactivity; alpha7 labeling was never detected in rod bipolar cells or rod amacrine cells (AII amacrine cells). Our data suggest that activation of alpha7 nAChRs by acetylcholine (ACh) or choline may affect glutamate release from several types of cone bipolar cells, modulating GC responses. ACh-induced excitation of inhibitory amacrine cells might cause either inhibition or disinhibition of other amacrine and GC circuits. Finally, ACh may act on alpha7 nAChRs expressed by GCs themselves.

Signal transmission from cones to amacrine cells in dark- and light-adapted tiger salamander retina

Amacrine cells (ACs) are third-order interneurons in the retina that mediate antagonistic surround inputs to retinal ganglion cells and motion-related signals in the inner retina. Previous studies have revealed that rod-to-AC signals in dark-adapted retina are mediated by a nonlinear high-gain synaptic pathway. In this study, we investigated how cone signals are transmitted to ACs under dark- and light-adapted conditions. By using the spectral subtraction method, we found that the voltage gain of the cone–AC synaptic pathway in dark-adapted salamander retina ( G D) is between 28 and 72, which is about one order of magnitude lower than the voltage gain of the rod–AC pathway. This suggests that, in darkness, rod signals are more efficiently transmitted to the ACs than cone signals. The voltage gain of the cone–AC synaptic pathway in the presence of 500 nm/−2.4 background light, G L, ranges between 28 and 56. Linear regression analysis indicates that G D and G L are strongly, positively, and linearly correlated. The average G L/ G D ratio is 0.73, suggesting that, on average, G L in any given AC is about 73% of G D. This adaptation-induced change in cone–AC voltage gain exemplifies use-dependent modulations of synaptic transmission in the retina, and possible mechanisms underlying light-mediated alterations of retinal synaptic function are discussed.

Antibody to calretinin stains AII amacrine cells in the rabbit retina: Double-label and confocal analyses

The AII or rod amacrine cell is a critical interneuron in the rod pathway of mammalian retinae. In this report, it is shown that commercially available antibodies to the calcium binding protein calretinin may be used to label the population of AII amacrine cells selectively. Calretinin-positive amacrine cells had the morphological attributes of AII amacrine cells. Double-labeling procedures showed that calretinin-positive somata were surrounded by dopaminergic varicosities and that calretinin-positive dendrites enclosed rod bipolar terminals, both as previously described for AII amacrine cells. By analyzing the surrounding kernel for each labeled pixel in the rod bipolar image, it is shown here that AII processes are adjacent to rod bipolar terminals at a level that far exceeds the random overlap present in images in which one label was rotated out of phase. Such a spatial relationship is indicative of synaptic connections, as well described for rod bipolar input to AII amacrine cells. AII amacrine cells also were double-labeled for calretinin and parvalbumin; however, a scattergram analysis of red versus green intensity showed that the parvalbumin antibody stained additional unidentified amacrine cells. In conclusion, at the appropriate dilution, calretinin antibodies are a useful marker for AII amacrine cells in the rabbit retina.

Neurotransmitter Coupling through Gap Junctions in the Retina

Although all bipolar cells in the retina probably use the excitatory transmitter glutamate, approximately half of the cone bipolar cells also contain elevated levels of the inhibitory transmitter glycine. Some types of cone bipolar cells make heterologous gap junctions with rod amacrine cells, which contain elevated levels of glycine, leading to the hypothesis that the bipolar cells obtain their glycine from amacrine cells. Experimental support for this hypothesis is now provided by three independent lines of evidence. First, the glycine transporter GLYT1 is expressed by the glycine-containing amacrine cells but not by the glycine-containing bipolar cells, suggesting that only the amacrine cells are functionally glycinergic. Second, the gap-junction blocker carbenoxolone greatly reduces exogenous 3H-glycine accumulation into the bipolar cells but not the amacrine cells. Moreover, when the endogenous glycine stores in both cell classes are depleted by incubating the retina with a glycine-uptake inhibitor, carbenoxolone blocks the subsequent glycine replenishment of the bipolar cells but not the amacrine cells. Third, intracellular injection of rod amacrine cells with the gap-junction permeant tracer Neurobiotin secondarily labels a heterogenous population of cone bipolar cells, all of which show glycine immunoreactivity. Taken together, these findings indicate that the elevated glycine in cone bipolar cells is not derived by high-affinity uptake or de novo synthesis but is obtained by neurotransmitter coupling through gap junctions with glycinergic amacrine cells. Thus transmitter content may be an unreliable indicator of transmitter function for neurons that make heterologous gap junctions.

Immunocytochemical localization of the NMDA-R2A receptor subunit in the cat retina

Immunocytochemical studies were performed to determine the distribution and cellular localization of the NMDA-R2A receptor subunit (R2A) in the cat retina. R2A-immunoreactivity (R2A-IR) was noted in all layers of the retina, with specific localizations in the outer segments of red/green and blue cone photoreceptors, B-type horizontal cells, several types of amacrine cells, Müller cells and the majority of cells in the ganglion cell layer. In the inner nuclear layer, 48% of all cells residing in the amacrine cell layer were R2A-IR including a cell resembling the GABAergic A17 amacrine cell. Interestingly, the AII rod amacrine cell was devoid of R2A-IR. Although the localization of the R2A subunit was anticipated in ganglion cells, amacrines and Müller cells, the presence of this receptor subunit to the cells in the outer retina was not expected. Here, both the R2A and the R2B subunits were found to be present in the outer segments of cone photoreceptors and to the tips of rod outer segments. Although the function of these receptor subunits in rod and cone photoreceptors remains to be determined, the fact that both R2A and R2B receptor subunits are localized to cone outer segments suggests a possible alternative pathway for calcium entry into a region where this cation plays such a crucial role in the process of phototransduction. To further classify the cells that display NR2A-IR, we performed dual labeling experiments showing the relationship between R2A-labeled cells with GABA. Results showed that all GABAergic-amacrines and displaced amacrines express the R2A-subunit protein. In addition, approximately 11% of the NR2A-labeled amacrines, did not stain for GABA. These findings support pharmacological data showing that NMDA directly facilitates GABA release in retina and retinal cultures [I.L. Ferreira, C.B. Duarte, P.F. Santos, C.M. Carvalho, A.P. Carvalho, Release of [ 3 H] GABA evoked by glutamate receptor agonist in cultured chick retinal cells: effect of Ca 2+, Brain Res. 664 (1994) 252–256; G.D. Zeevalk, W.J. Nicklas, Action of the anti-ischemic agent ifenprodil on N-methyl- d-aspartate and kainate-mediated excitotoxicity, Brain Res. 522 (1990) 135–139; R. Huba, H.D. Hofmann, Transmitter-gated currents of GABAergic amacrine-like cells in chick retinal cultures, Vis. Neurosci. 6 (1991) 303–314; M. Yamashita, R. Huba, H.D. Hofmann, Early in vitro development of voltage- and transmitter-gated currents in GABAergic amacrine cells, Dev. Brain Res. 82 (1994) 95–102; R. Ientile, S. Pedale, V. Picciurro, V. Macaione, C. Fabiano, S. Macaione, Nitric oxide mediates NMDA-evoked [3H]GABA release from chick retina cells, FEBS Lett. 417 (1997) 345–348; R.C. Kubrusly, M.C. deMello, F.G. deMello, Aspartate as a selective NMDA agonist in cultured cells from the avian retina, Neurochem. Intl. 32 (1998) 47–52] or reduction of GABA in vivo [N.N. Osborn, A.J. Herrera, The effect of experimental ischaemia and excitatory amino acid agonist on the GABA and serotonin immunoreactivities in the rabbit retina, Neurosci. 59 (1994) 1071–1081]. Since the majority of GABAergic synapses in the inner retina are onto both rod and cone bipolar axon terminals [R.G. Pourcho, M.T. Owzcarzak, Distribution of GABA immunoreactivity in the cat retina: A light and electron-microscopic study, Vis. Neurosci. 2 (1989) 425–435], we hypothesize that the NMDA-receptor plays a crucial role in providing feedback inhibition onto rod and cone bipolar cells.

Immunocytochemical localization of dopamine D1 receptors in the retina of mammals.

Dopamine is one of the major neurotransmitters in the retina. It is released from amacrine and interplexiform cells into both inner (IPL) and outer (OPL) plexiform layers. Several dopaminergic actions are known to occur through D1 receptors (D1R) but the precise location of these receptors has not been established. An antibody that recognizes the intracytoplasmic C-terminal of the rat D1R was used to detect D1R, immunohistochemically, in rats (Wistar and RCS), mouse, hamster, and macaque monkey retinas. The OPL was heavily stained in each species, consistent with the known actions of dopamine on horizontal cells. Three to five bands were observed in the IPL, depending on species. Three were in the a sublayer, the outermost of which was close to the amacrine cell layer, and may represent the massive dopamine input to the AII rod-amacrine cells. As observed in mice, where bipolar cells are D1-immunoreactive, the band located in sublayer 3 of the IPL may contain cone-bipolar cell terminals. A band of D1R-immunoreactivity in the b sublayer of the IPL contains ON-bipolar cell terminals and a second site of interaction between dopaminergic cells and the AII amacrine cells. This sublayer was absent from the RCS rat retina, suggesting a severe impairment of the rod-driven pathway following rod degeneration in these mutant rats. Cells in the ganglion cell layer exhibited relatively heavy staining, and may be ganglion cells or displaced amacrine cells. Some extrasynaptic localizations of D1R in the retina are suggested.

Synaptic connections of the narrow-field, bistratified rod amacrine cell (AII) in the rabbit retina.

The synaptic connections of the narrow-field, bistratified rod amacrine cell (AII) in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) of the rabbit retina were reconstructed from electron micrographs of continuous series of thin sections. The AII amacrine cell receives a large synaptic input from the axonal endings of rod bipolar cells in the most vitreal region of the IPL (sublamina b, S5) and a smaller input from axonal endings of cone bipolar cells in the scleral region of the IPL (sublamina a, S1-S2). Amacrine input, localized at multiple levels in the IPL, equals the total number of synapses received from bipolar cells. The axonal endings of cone bipolar cells represent the major target for the chemical output of the AII amacrine cell: these synapses are established by the lobular appendages in sublamina a (S1-S2). Ganglion cell dendrites represent only 4% of the output of the AII amacrine and most of them are also postsynaptic to the cone bipolars which receive AII input. The AII amacrine is not presynaptic to other amacrine cells. Finally, the AII amacrine makes gap junctions with the axonal arborizations of cone bipolars that stratify in sublamina b (S3-S4) as well as with other AII amacrine cells in S5. Therefore, in the rabbit retina 1) the rod pathway consists of five neurons arranged in series: rod-->rod bipolar-->AII amacrine-->cone bipolar-->ganglion cell; 2) it seems unlikely that a class of ganglion cells exists that is exclusively devoted to scotopic functions. In ventral, midperipheral retina, about nine rod bipolar cells converge onto a single AII amacrine, but one of them establishes a much higher proportion of synaptic contacts than the rest. Conversely, each rod bipolar cell diverges onto four AII amacrine cells, but one of them receives the largest fraction of synapses. Thus, within the pattern of convergence and divergence suggested by population studies, preferential synaptic pathways are established.

Synaptic organization of starburst amacrine cells in rabbit retina: Analysis of serial thin sections by electron microscopy and graphic reconstruction

The synaptic organization of starburst amacrine cells was studied by electron microscopy of individual or overlapping pairs of Golgi-impregnated cells. Both type a and type b cells were analyzed, the former with normally placed somata and dendritic branching in sublamina a, and the latter with somata displaced to the ganglion cell layer and branching in sublamina b. Starburst amacrine cells were thin-sectioned horizontally, tangential to the retinal surface, and electron micrographs of each section in a series were taken en montage. Cell bodies and dendritic trees were reconstructed graphically from sets of photographic montages representing the serial sections. Synaptic inputs from cone bipolar cells and amacrine cells are distributed sparsely and irregularly all along the dendritic tree. Sites of termination include the synaptic boutons of starburst amacrine cells, which lie at the perimeter of the dendritic tree in the "distal dendritic zone." In central retina, bipolar cell input is associated with very small dendritic spines near the cell body in the "proximal dendritic zone." The proximal dendrites of type a and type b cells generally lie in planes or "strata" of the inner plexiform layer (IPL), near the margins of the IPL. The boutons and varicosities of starburst amacrine cells, distributed int he distal dendritic zone, lie in the "starburst substrata," which occupy a narrow middle region in each of the two sublaminae, a and b, in rabbit retina. As a consequence of differences in stratification, proximal and distal dendritic zones are potentially subject to different types of input. Type b starburst amacrines do not receive inputs from rod bipolar terminals, which lie mainly in the inner marginal zone of the IPL (stratum 5), but type a cells receive some input from the lobular presynaptic appendages of rod amacrine cells in sublamina a, at the border of strata 1 and 2. There is good correspondence between boutons or varicosities and synaptic outputs of starburst amacrine cells, but not all boutons gave ultrastructural evidence of presynaptic junctions. The boutons and varicosities may be both pre- and postsynaptic. They are postsynaptic to cone bipolar cell and amacrine cell terminals, and presynaptic primarily to ganglion cell dendrites. In two pairs of type b starburst amacrine cells with overlapping dendritic fields, close apposition of synaptic boutons was observed, raising the possibility of synaptic contact between them. The density of the Golgi-impregnation and other technical factors prevented definite resolution of this question. No unimpregnated profiles, obviously amacrine in origin, were found postsynaptic to the impregnated starburst boutons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Excitatory dyad synapse in rabbit retina.

In the inner plexiform layer of the rabbit retina, the synaptic endings of bipolar cells contact a pair of postsynaptic processes at an unusual type of specialized junction, the dyad synapse. One of the members of the postsynaptic dyad may return conventional feedback synapses onto the bipolar endings. Freeze-fracturing demonstrates that, opposite the presynaptic active zone, both postsynaptic membranes contain an aggregate of intramembrane particles that remain associated with the outer leaflet (E face) of the fractured plasmalemma; this is a feature typical of excitatory synapses in the central nervous system. Intracellular recordings followed by injection of horseradish peroxidase showed that at the dyad synapse the endings of rod bipolar cells are usually presynaptic to the dendrites of two amacrine cells, one narrow-field and bistratified (AII) and the other wide-field (A17). Only the A17 rod amacrine cell returns feedback synapses onto the bipolar endings. Both amacrine cells respond to illumination with transient-sustained depolarizations, dominated by rods; thus, the polarity of their light responses is the same as that of rod bipolar cells. We conclude that the dyad synapses established by rod bipolar cells with the two types of amacrine cells are excitatory.

Amacrine cells in scotopic vision.

Signals from rod bipolar cells of cat retina are processed by a variety of rod amacrine cells before finally arriving at ganglion cells. Three of these rod amacrine cells (AII, A13, and A17 ) have been studied at the physiological and anatomical levels; the results suggest that each carries out a unique visual function: AII cells appear to quicken the response time of the rod system in the mid-scotopic range, while A17 cells may increase the light-gathering area of rod bipolars near visual threshold. Stimulation of A13 cells may disinhibit ganglion cells, thus heightening their responsiveness at low levels of illumination.

On and off pathways through amacrine cells in mammalian retina: The synaptic connections of “starburst” amacrine cells

The neural architecture of on and off pathways in mammalian retina is described, including the development of ideas leading to an understanding of the bisublaminar organization of the inner plexiform layer of the retina which supports these two pathways. The complexities of bipolar cell contributions are contrasted with the relative simplicity of ganglion cell organization with regard to bisublaminar architecture, and a key role is described for internuncial amacrine cells as specific targets for bipolar cells. Two very different kinds of amacrine cell are considered and compared, both of Which mediate bipolar input to ganglion cells. These are the rod (type II) amacrine cell, and the more recently discovered “starburst” amacrine cell, which is apparently cholinergic in function. As different as the wide-field starburst amacrine cells are from the narrow-field rod amacrine cells, they share important features. Both are interposed between bipolar and ganglion cells, and both have segregated regions of presynaptic boutons. They differ, however, in that rod amacrines may perform more specific functions related to receptive field center organization, while the functional role of starburst amacrines may be unrelated to receptive field properties of ganglion cells. The mirror-symmetry of type a and type b (off and on) starburst amacrine cells is described together with their synaptic circuitry. In contrast to the rod amacrine cell the output of starburst amacrines is exclusively to ganglion cells. Others have proposed a dual function for acetylcholine (ACh) in the retina. A unifying hypothesis is briefly sketched here which relates the pharmacology of ACh and the dendritic stratification of starburst amacrine cells to the form and function of ganglion cells. It is proposed that the amount of generalized synaptic excitation received from ACh starburst amacrine cells by a particular type of ganglion cell is largely a function of co-stratification of the ganglion cell's dendrites with the distal boutons of starburst amacrine cells.