Since the earliest days of the U.S. Space Program, concerns have been raised regarding the atmospheric perturbations that might be caused by the exhaust products of large rocket engines. In 1964 a comprehensive review of the subject was published by Kellogg [1964] in which the space science community was alerted to the many possible ways that rocket ‘pollutants’ could have environmental impacts. The final impression left by Kellogg's paper was that the terrestrial atmosphere was sufficiently dense to absorb any conceivable shock that an aerospace technology might reasonably be expected to build—even to the point of the giant Saturn V rockets envisioned for the Apollo Program.In the 15 years that have passed since Kellogg's assessment, very little evidence was found to suggest that rocket effluents were in fact perilous to our environment. A reappraisal of all published accounts of rocket‐induced modifications of the atmosphere since Sputnik 1 (M. Mendillo, unpublished manuscript, 1979) reveals that hardly a dozen accounts exist describing specific aeronomic perturbations associated with the many hundreds of rocket launches that have occurred since 1957. There are good reasons for this: (1) The vast majority of rockets launched in the last 2 decades were relatively small ones, and thus the exhaust emissions amounted to no more than very minor additions of essentially trace species. (2) Of the large rockets (Saturns, Atlas/Centaurs, SL‐4/Soyuz) the overwhelming majority of launches carried payloads into low earth orbit (h < 200 km), where the typical exhaust products (H20, H2, CO2, N2, and O2,) were again relatively inconspicuous additions to ambient conditions. (3) Large‐rocket launches made by U.S. agencies generally occur at the Kennedy Space Flight Center, thereby insuring that rocket ascent trajectories occur over water—conditions hardly conducive to atmospheric monitoring via ground‐based facilities.
Read full abstract