Robotic Gynecologic Surgery Research Articles

The analgesic benefit of rectus sheath block in robotic gynecologic surgery: A retrospective study.

With the growing adoption of robotic techniques in gynecologic surgery, the advantages of minimally invasive procedures over traditional open surgery, such as reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery, are clear. Yet, establishing an effective multimodal analgesic regimen remains a challenge. This retrospective study from a tertiary care center aimed to assess the analgesic efficacy of the rectus sheath block (RSB) on postoperative pain and opioid consumption after robotic gynecologic surgery. Between June 2022 and March 2023, 20 patients who underwent robotic gynecologic surgery were evaluated. Key parameters included postoperative visual analog scale scores, opioid consumption, and postoperative nausea/vomiting instances. Anesthesia protocols were standardized, with postsurgical pain management involving RSB and a patient-controlled analgesia device filled with morphine. Patients showed an average morphine intake of 8.2 ± 5.09 mg over the initial 24 hours postsurgery. During mobilization, average pain scores were consistently low, with no correlation identified between opioid consumption and age or body mass index. 40% of patients reported postoperative nausea on the first day, and no complications linked to the RSB were observed. The study underlines the potential of integrating RSB in a multimodal analgesic regimen after robotic gynecologic surgery. Its application may lead to reduced opioid consumption and more efficient postoperative pain management. Further randomized controlled trials are recommended to validate these findings.

Perioperative management of oncological gynaecological robotic surgery patients (application of the ERAS protocol): a narrative literature review

Perioperative management of oncological gynaecological robotic surgery patients (application of the ERAS protocol): a narrative literature review

Asian Society for Gynecologic Robotic Surgery Congress 2024 meeting report: Taking it to the next level

Asian Society for Gynecologic Robotic Surgery Congress 2024 meeting report: Taking it to the next level

Seeing is believing: Patients’ attitudes and information preferences towards robotic gynaecological surgery

ObjectivesRobotic gynaecological surgery (RS) is reported to be associated with feelings of apprehension and anxiety pre-operatively in a proportion of patients. This study aimed to investigate patients’ understanding and perceptions towards RS, and whether the format of RS information resources could improve acceptability of RS. DesignA two-phase, sequential, mixed methods study involving semi-structured interviews of patients who had previously undergone gynaecological RS and a block-randomised crossover study of women from the general public. Qualitative data from interviews were analysed using thematic analysis, quantitative data from questionnaires were summarised and analysed using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. ResultsInterview participants reported very little background knowledge of RS prior to their surgery. Many participants stated that written information leaflets did not adequately describe the robotic set-up and procedure, leading to anxiety and information seeking from alternative sources. The use of videos or models to visually demonstrate how the surgery would be performed and the interaction between the surgeon and the robot were proposed to address patients’ needs. Questionnaire data from 30 women demonstrated an increase in acceptability of RS following provision of information, with 73.3 % of the participants reporting that the video alone was an adequate source of information, compared to only 46.7 % for the printed leaflet. ConclusionThis study gives new insights into the impact of information provision for patients undergoing RS. Availability of information resources in different modality formats, in particular an information video, may help address patients’ information needs, reduce anxiety and hence increase acceptability of RS.

Cross Sectional Survey of Ob/Gyn Residents’ Graduated Experience with Robotic Surgery

Study ObjectiveOb/Gyn resident experience with robotic gynecologic surgery has been evaluated at time of graduation, but no specific surgical procedures were identified to differentiate the experiences of residents at each level. This study proposes to determine which factors are correlated with more hands-on robotic surgery experience and resident satisfaction. DesignAn IRB-approved, 15-question survey was distributed electronically. 98 responses were received for a rate of 44%. Linear regression and ANOVA statistical analysis were performed. SettingCurrent residents at eight Ob/gyn residency programs in the US were surveyed. PatientsN/A InterventionsSurvey administration Measurement and Main ResultsThe majority of respondents were satisfied (48%) or had neutral feelings (20%) with regard to their robotic surgery experience. All respondents reported experience with uterine manipulation or bedside assisting by PGY2. Earliest experience performing hysterectomy was most common in PGY2 or PGY3.Seventy-six percent of PGY3 or PGY4 residents report operating on the console for some or all major robotic surgeries, with 69% having participated in greater than 20 robotic surgery cases during residency. Only exposure to MIGS faculty is significantly associated with high robotic surgery experience (p=.022).Overall satisfaction with robotic surgery experience increased significantly with higher level of participation (p<.0001), particularly operating at the console during some or most of the surgery; longitudinal experiences with hysterectomy, myomectomy, and salpingectomy/oophorectomy (p<.05); but not with solely bedside assisting or vaginal cuff closure. Factors limiting robotic console experience included case time constraints, lack of first assists, case complexity, and attending comfort. ConclusionsOb/Gyn resident satisfaction with training is significantly related to level and duration of robotic surgery participation. MIGS faculty contribute to more resident experience, and limiting factors include time constraints, case complexity and lack of first assists. These results can provide a framework for structuring resident training in robotic surgery.

Employing the Aviation Model to Reduce Errors in Robotic Gynecological Surgery: A Narrative Review.

The operating room is the environment where harm to the patient is most likely. Robotic surgery was listed as one of the top 10 health hazards as late as 2020. Taking inspiration from other fields of application, such as aeronautics, checklists have been increasingly implemented in medical practice over the years, becoming essential components of the operating theatre. In addition to checklists, simulation has taken on a fundamental importance in reducing errors. This paper aims to provide a narrative review to assess the importance of checklists and training in robotic surgery and how they improve the outcome. A comprehensive literature search from January 2000 to September 2023 was conducted. A total of 97 articles were included in the initial search. Eleven studies were deemed relevant and were considered eligible for full-text reading. Among these, ten studies focused on the analysis of training effectiveness. An article in our review assessed the benefits of introducing checklists in the operating room. Innovations created in aviation, such as checklists and simulation, have entered the medical field to prevent human error. Developing dedicated checklist and surgical teams, through theoretical and practical training, has become essential in modern medicine. Tools such as checklists, training, and simulation are among the best methods to reduce adverse medical events.

Does the presence of abdominal wall adhesions make gynecologic robotic surgery difficult?

This study aimed to assess the status of abdominal wall adhesions resulting from prior surgeries and their impact on the outcomes of robotic surgery. We retrospectively reviewed clinical information, surgical outcomes, and the status of abdominal wall adhesions in patients who underwent gynecologic robotic surgery at Yamanashi Central Hospital, between April 2018 and March 2023. Abdominal wall adhesions were classified into seven locations and their presence was assessed at each site. Among the 768 cases examined, 196 showed the presence of abdominal wall adhesions. Notably, patients with a history of abdominal surgery exhibited a significantly higher incidence of abdominal wall adhesions than those without such surgical history, although no significant difference was observed in the frequency of adhesions in the upper left abdomen. Patients with a history of gynecologic, gastrointestinal, or biliopancreatic surgeries were more likely to have adhesions at the umbilicus or upper abdomen sites where trocars are typically inserted during robotic surgery. Although cases with abdominal wall adhesions experienced longer operative times than those without, there was no significant difference in estimated blood loss. In 13 cases (1.7%), adjustments in trocar placement were necessary due to abdominal wall adhesions, although none of the cases required conversion to open or conventional laparoscopic surgery. Abdominal wall adhesions pose challenges to minimally invasive procedures, emphasizing the importance of predicting these adhesions based on a patient's surgical history to safely perform robotic surgery. These results suggest that the robot's flexibility proves effective in managing abdominal wall adhesions.

Exploring the Evolution of Robotic Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives.

Robotic surgery has emerged as a transformative technology in obstetrics and gynecology, offering enhanced precision and minimally invasive techniques for various procedures. This paper explores the evolution of robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology, examining its historical development, current applications, and prospects. Through a comprehensive review of the literature and case studies, we highlight the benefits of robotic surgery, including reduced trauma, improved patient outcomes, and increased surgeon capabilities. However, cost, training requirements, and regulatory concerns hinder widespread adoption. Continuing technological innovation is expected to enhance the efficacy and applicability of robotic-assisted procedures. Collaboration between healthcare professionals, researchers, and industry stakeholders is essential to address these challenges and ensure optimal patient care. By embracing the opportunities presented by robotic surgery while addressing associated challenges, practitioners and researchers can contribute to the continued advancement of this transformative technology in obstetrics and gynecology.

Asian Society for Gynecologic Robotic Surgery consensus guidelines on robotic surgery in gynecological cancer

This document outlines guidelines drafted by the Consensus Panel for Gynecologic Oncology of the Asian Society for Gynecologic Robotic Surgery (ASGRS) based on review of contemporaneous data on robotic surgery and related issues such as sentinel node biopsy and surgery for cervical cancer. These guidelines were also the basis of the Consensus Statement on robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology made at the Asian Summit on Robotic Surgery, November 2022.

Asian Society for Gynecologic Robotic Surgery Congress 2023, Always AHEAD

Asian Society for Gynecologic Robotic Surgery Congress 2023, Always AHEAD

Asian Society for Gynecologic Robotic Surgery: Taking it to the next level

Asian Society for Gynecologic Robotic Surgery: Taking it to the next level

Global research hotspots and trends on robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology: a bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer.

Over the last two decades, the quantity of papers published in relation to robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology has continued to grow globally. However, no bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer has been performed to evaluate the past and present of global research in the field. In this study, we aimed to analyze the bibliometric characteristics of papers on robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology to reveal research hotspots and trends in this field. The Web of Science Core Collection was searched for scientific papers on robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology published between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2023. Bibliometric metadata of each selected paper was extracted for analysis. The results were visualized by VOSviewer (version 1.6.18). A total of 1,430 papers met the inclusion criteria. The United States had the highest total link strengths and contributed the most papers (n = 793). The Mayo Clinic produced the largest number of papers (n = 85), and Professor Pedro T Ramirez contributed the most papers (n = 36). The number of citations ranged from 0 to 295 with a total sum of 29,103. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology published the most relevant papers (n = 252). Keywords were classified into six clusters based on co-occurrence data, of which cluster 1, cluster 4 and cluster 6 had more main keywords with the largest average publication year. This is the first VOSviewer-based bibliometric analysis of robotic surgery research in obstetrics and gynecology. The United States was the leading country, and the Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology was the most productive journal in the field. Scientists and institutions from around the world should push their boundaries to bring about deep collaboration. The main research topic has always been the use of robotic surgery in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. More randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to compare surgical outcomes of robotic surgery with other surgical approaches. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse has become a new research hotspot, and robotic surgery for sentinel lymph node detection in gynecologic malignancies are more potential directions for future research.

Identifying key predictors for uterine manipulator use in robotic simple hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Robotic simple hysterectomy (RSH) is the most common robotic gynecologic surgery in the United States. Uterine manipulators are commonly used to handle the uterus during laparoscopic surgery, but few studies have examined their necessity in RSH. This study retrospectively compares RSH cases with and without the use of manipulators, and identifies predictors for their intraoperative use. This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing RSH for benign pathologies at Kawasaki Medical School from October 2020 to December 2022. Patients with malignancies were excluded. The robotic surgeries were performed by three skilled surgeons using the four-arm da Vinci Xi surgical system. Data on perioperative and operative parameters were collected, including age, body mass index (BMI), history of abdominal surgery, disease type, presence of ovarian cysts, and operative time. Statistical analyses were performed using EZR software, with multivariate logistic regression to identify predictive factors for uterine manipulator use. The study included 113 patients who underwent RSH without a uterine manipulator and 58 with one. Patients without a manipulator were older, while those with a manipulator had higher BMIs and a higher prevalence of ovarian chocolate cysts and Douglas obliteration. Operating time was shorter without a manipulator. Independent predictors for manipulator use were higher BMI, presence of ovarian endometrioid cysts, and Douglas obliteration. RSH without a uterine manipulator is feasible and can reduce the need for surgical assistants. Predictors for manipulator use include higher BMI, ovarian cysts, and Douglas obliteration. The use of a fourth robotic arm can enhance surgical independence and resource efficiency. Further research is needed to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness and outcomes of this approach.

A Successful Ventilatory Approach in a Severe Class 3 Obesity Patient Undergoing Robotic Gynecological Surgery

A Successful Ventilatory Approach in a Severe Class 3 Obesity Patient Undergoing Robotic Gynecological Surgery

Comparison of the effects of intraoperative remifentanil and sufentanil infusion on postoperative pain management in robotic gynecological surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Remifentanil and sufentanil are potent short-acting synthetic opioid analgesics. The administration of remifentanil has been associated with the incidence of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia may be alleviated when opioids, such as morphine, are switched to sufentanil. Therefore, this retrospective observational study aimed to compare the effects of remifentanil and sufentanil on postoperative pain in patients undergoing robotic gynecological surgery. We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent elective robotic gynecological surgery between January 2016 and February 2021. The patients were classified into sufentanil (n = 159) or remifentanil (n = 359) groups according to the opioids administered continuously during anesthesia. The primary outcome assessed in this study was the postoperative pain score measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes assessed included the recovery time (from discontinuation of opioid infusion to extubation) and frequency of rescue analgesic administration in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The recovery time did not differ significantly between the two groups. The NRS score for pain (median [1Q, 3Q]) in the PACU was significantly lower in the sufentanil group than in the remifentanil group (2 [2, 3] vs. 4 [3, 7], P < 0.001). The frequency of rescue analgesic administration in the PACU was 6.3% and 35.4% in the sufentanil and remifentanil groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Sufentanil, as an adjunct to sevoflurane anesthesia is more advantageous than remifentanil in terms of postoperative pain control during robotic gynecological surgery.

Near-infrared and hysteroscopy-guided robotic excision of uterine isthmocele with laser fiber: a novel high-precision technique

To describe a novel high-precision technique for robotic excision of uterine isthmocele, employing a carbon dioxide laser fiber, under hysteroscopic guidance, and near-infrared guidance. Video article. A 36-year-old multipara with three prior cesarean sections presented to our infertility clinic with secondary infertility. The patient had been trying to conceive for 6 months without success. The patient underwent a hystero-salpingo contrast sonography which identified a large cesarean scar defect with a 1.4 mm residual myometrial thickness (RMT). The patient was counseled on surgical management with robotic approach due to RMT < 3 mm precluding her from hysteroscopic resection and the potential risk for a cesarean scar ectopic or abnormal placentation if she were to become pregnant in the future. She elected to undergo excision and repair and informed consent was obtained from the patient. The robot was docked for traditional gynecologic robotic surgery. The uterus was injected with 5 units of vasopressin. We used a carbon dioxide laser fiber (Lumenis® FIberLase) at a power of 5 watts as the sole energy source for dissection. The bladder was dissected off the uterus to identify the general area of the isthmocele. At that point, diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed using a 30-degree 5 mm hysteroscope (Karl Storz®) to identify and enter the isthmocele. Near-infrared vision (da Vinci Firefly®, Intuitive USA) was activated to precisely outline the extent of the isthmocele, which was not visible with simple transillumination from the hysteroscope. We proceeded with laser excision in infrared/grey scale using the laser at a power of 20 watts removing the entire area that was highlighted by the Firefly®. After full excision of the isthmocele, the hysteroscope was removed and was eventually replaced by a uterine manipulator (ConMed VCare DX®). The hysterotomy was closed with a two layer closure: 4 mattress sutures of 2-0 Vicryl (Ethicon®) followed by a running 2-0 PDS Stratafix (Ethicon®). The peritoneal layer was closed over these two layers with 2-0 PDS Stratafix (Ethicon®) in a running fashion. The uterine manipulator was removed and a 14 French Malecot catheter (Bard®) was placed in the uterine cavity to allow the healing to proceed with minimal risk of cervical stenosis. The bladder was backfilled to ensure integrity of the bladder wall. Interceed adhesion barrier (Gynecare®) was then placed over the area of the repair and the procedure was concluded. The patient included in this video gave consent for publication of the video and posting of the video online including social media, the journal website, scientific literature websites (such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, etc.) and other applicable sites. Completion of excision and repair of cesarean scar defect without surgical complications. Robotic excision and repair of a sizable uterine isthmocele with carbon dioxide laser fiber and da Vinci Firefly® was completed successfully without any surgical complications. Diagnostic hysteroscopy was used to positively identify the isthmocele and provide transillumination. However, the thickness of the cervical myometrium only allows the hysteroscopic light to shine through the thinnest portion of myometrium at the apex of the isthmocele, while the near-infrared vision allowed by the da Vinci Firefly® technology was used to precisely identify the borders of the defect. The carbon dioxide laser was used to completely remove the defect while avoiding damage to delicate reproductive tissue and over-excision. No complications were identified during the postoperative visit. MRI three months after the surgery revealed a RMT of 10 mm at the location of excision compared to the initial RMT of 1.4 mm. Currently, there is no gold-standard technique for surgical management of isthmocele. This is the first description of the combined use of hysteroscopy, near-infrared vision and laser fiber for the robotic excision of isthmocele. This specific setup proves to be a useful technical improvement. The use of near-infrared vision combined with precise hysteroscopic targeting allows much clearer definition of the isthmocele borders, and the flexible laser fiber allows millimetric excision in the absence of appreciable lateral thermal spread. Further investigation is warranted to identify a gold standard surgical technique for patients with CSD.

Strategies and factors to maximize cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery in benign gynecological disease.

Operating room procedures account for half of the gross hospital cost in the United States per annum. Hysterectomy is the eighth most common surgery nationally, with more than 300,000 cases every year. Since the introduction of robotic surgery in benign gynecology, concern has been raised regarding the increased cost without significant improvements in outcomes or practice. Surgeon volume, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and selected intraoperative instrumentation are all factors that have a direct effect on cost in robotic surgery. Cost is indirectly influenced by the OR team workflow, postoperative processes to expedite discharge, and converting surgery to the ambulatory setting. More research is needed to develop evidence-based practices for cost containment in robotic surgery.

Robotic surgery in Gynecology: the present and the future.

Since its introduction, laparoscopic surgery has been often preferred over open surgery in obstetrics and gynecology due to its advantages, such as less bleeding, lower incidence of adhesions, reduced postoperative pain, short hospital stay, and quick return to daily life. However, in the case of complex surgeries, laparoscopy presented some limitations. Nonetheless, since the 1980s, medical robots have been introduced to overcome the technical limitations of laparoscopy and start a new age for minimally invasive surgery. In this review, we explore the indications and advantages and disadvantages of robotic surgery in the field of gynecology, and try to assess the recent trend of robotic surgery.

Robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology: a bibliometric study.

We aimed to identify the trends and patterns of robotic surgery research in obstetrics and gynecology since its implementation. We used data from Clarivate's Web of Science platform to identify all articles published on robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology. A total of 838 publications were included in the analysis. Of these, 485 (57.9%) were from North America and 281 (26.0%) from Europe. 788 (94.0%) articles originated in high-income countries and none from low-income countries. The number of publications per year reached a peak of 69 articles in 2014. The subject of 344 (41.1%) of articles was gynecologic oncology, followed by benign gynecology (n = 176, 21.0%) and urogynecology (n = 156, 18.6%). Articles discussing gynecologic oncology had lower representation in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) (32.0% vs. 41.6%, p < 0.001) compared with high income countries. After 2015 there has been a higher representation of publications from Asia (19.7% vs. 7.7%) and from LMIC (8.4% vs. 2.6%), compared to the preceding years. In a multivariable regression analysis, journal's impact factor [aOR 95% CI 1.30 (1.16-1.41)], gynecologic oncology subject [aOR 95% CI 1.73 (1.06-2.81)] and randomized controlled trials [aOR 95% CI 3.67 (1.47-9.16)] were associated with higher number of citations per year. In conclusion, robotic surgery research in obstetrics & gynecology is dominated by research in gynecologic oncology and reached a peak nearly a decade ago. The disparity in the quantity and quality of robotic research between high income countries and LMIC raises concerns regarding the access of the latter to high quality healthcare resources such as robotic surgery.

Robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery in an older population: A comparison study

IntroductionRobotic-assisted surgery in select patients has been shown to result in less peri-operative morbidity. Few studies have explored the association of robotic-assisted gynecology oncology surgery complication rates and increasing age. Our objective was to evaluate the peri- and postoperative complication rates in patients age 65 years or above in minimally-invasive robotic gynecologic surgery. Material and MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of data from 765 consecutive minimally-invasive robotic-assisted surgeries performed by high-volume gynecologic oncologists. The patients were divided into “younger” patients aged <65 years and “older” patients aged ≥65 years. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications. ResultsOf the 765 patients analyzed, 185 (24%) were ≥ 65. The intraoperative complication rate in patients <65 was 1.9% (11/580) versus 1.62% (3/185) in females ≥65 (p = 0.808). The postoperative complication rate in patients <65 was 15.5% (90/580) versus 22.7% (42/185) in females ≥65 (p = 0.328). We observed more post-operative complications with patients who had intraoperative complications compared to patients who developed post-operative complications without intraoperative complcations in our sample, but it was not statisticaly significant (OR = 2.78, p = 0.097). The average estimated blood loss was 137.5 ml (0−1000) for patients younger than 65 years and 134.81 ml (0−2200) in patients 65 years or older (p = 0.097). DiscussionRobotic gynecologic oncology surgery is common. When performed by expert surgeons, complications are not associated with increasing age.