Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Research Articles

Current Status and Prospects of Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Current Status and Prospects of Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery first rib resection—surgical technique

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery first rib resection—surgical technique

Efficacy of the da Vinci robot versus thoracoscopic surgery for patients with mediastinal tumors of different body mass index: a multicenter propensity score-matched study

BackgroundThe purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of patients with mediastinal tumors of different body mass indices (BMI).MethodsA retrospective cohort study was used to collect 260 patients with mediastinal tumors admitted to three medical centers in China from December 2020 to March 2024. These patients underwent mediastinal tumor resection by RATS (n = 125) or VATS (n = 135). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed for the both groups, and further, the patients were divided into the N-BMI group (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2) and the H-BMI group (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) based on their BMI to compare patients’ surgery-related information.ResultsThe RATS group had more advantages than the VATS group in terms of intraoperative blood loss, total postoperative drainage, postoperative drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. As for hospitalization costs, the VATS group was more advantageous. In the H-BMI group, subgroup analysis showed a statistically significant difference in shorter operative time and lower incidence of postoperative complications in the RATS group.ConclusionRATS has technical and short-term efficacy advantages in comparison with VATS, although it has the drawback of high costs associated with the treatment of mediastinal tumors. In the patients with mediastinal tumors of H-BMI, RATS can achieve better short-term outcomes and safety, especially in the reduction of the incidence of postoperative complications.

Pain outcomes of outside-the-cage robotic thoracic surgery: a prospective matched-cohort study

Management of acute and chronic pain after thoracic surgery for pulmonary resection or thymectomy remains a challenge for both thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists. Advances in minimally invasive robotic procedures have made subcostal outside-the-cage (OTC) resections possible, but the procedure’s pain benefits have not been previously measured. A single-center cohort was consented to undergo robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) with an OTC or transthoracic (TT) approach. On every post-operative day (POD), patients were asked to complete the visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, assigning a score of 0–10 with higher scores equaling higher pain intensity. Additionally, patients’ opioid consumption was recorded and classified using morphine equivalent dose (MED). Descriptive statistics of demographics, Mann–Whitney, and Chi-squared tests were performed in a matched analysis. Altogether, 50 OTC patients and 50 TT patients were included. For each group, 1 pneumonectomy, 19 lobectomies, 10 segmentectomies, and 20 thymectomies were performed. Between groups, most were male (n = 54; p = 0.42) and there were no differences in American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (p = 0.51), or tobacco consumption (p = 0.45). Patients who received an OTC approach experienced significantly lower pain scores on POD-0 (p = 0.001), POD-1 (p < 0.001), and POD-2 (p < 0.001). POD-3 OTC VAS scores were not different from those of the TT group (p = 0.09). Similarly, MED was lower for the OTC group on POD-0 (p < 0.001), POD-1 (p = 0.03), and POD-3 (p = 0.03). The RATS-OTC approach results in a more rapid decrease in self-reported pain by the patient as well as significantly lower levels of MED.

Efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration in children

ObjectiveThis study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration (PS) in children.MethodsAll video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and RAST performed on...

Minimally Invasive Pneumonectomy vs Open Pneumonectomy: Outcomes and Predictors of Conversion

BackgroundIn the modern era, whether minimally invasive pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) provides a survival advantage over open pneumonectomy is unknown. MethodsPatients who underwent pneumonectomy for NSCLC between 2015 and 2020 were queried from the National Cancer Database. Surgical approach was categorized as robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), or open pneumonectomy on an intention-to-treat basis. Propensity score matching was performed to balance patient cohorts. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to examine the association between surgical approach and 30- and 90-day mortality, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess overall survival. ResultsWe identified 3784 patients, including 73% open (n = 2776), 19% VATS (n = 725), and 8% RATS (n = 283). The overall conversion rate from minimally invasive to open was 29.5% (n = 298). After propensity matching 212 patients per cohort, there were no differences between open, VATS, and RATS 30-day (9.4% vs 8.5% vs 7.5%, respectively; P = .807) or 90-day mortality (14.2% vs 12.3% vs 10.4%, respectively; P = .516). Median overall survival was similar among open (48 months; 95% CI, 35.6-64.1 months), VATS (51.0 months; 95% CI, 34.9-72.3 months), and RATS approaches (50 months; 95% CI, 42.6-NA months; P = .560). Multivariate analysis of the matched cohort found no association between approach and overall survival. RATS (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.94; P = .020) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio, 0.52, 95% CI, 0.27-0.98; P = .045) were found to be protective against conversion to open. ConclusionsMinimally invasive pneumonectomy can be performed with short-term and long-term survival that are equivalent to open pneumonectomy.

Determinants of successful minimally invasive surgery for resectable non–small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

ObjectiveMinimally invasive surgery (MIS) (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) for pulmonary resection is standard in early-stage non–small cell lung cancer because it is associated with better perioperative outcomes than thoracotomy. MIS for resection of more advanced non–small cell lung cancer (Stages IB-IIIB) treated with neoadjuvant therapy has been utilized. However, the determinants of success are not well defined. MethodsA single institution retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted, querying for patients with clinical Stage IB through IIIB non–small cell lung cancer who had resection after neoadjuvant systemic therapy without radiation from 2013 to 2022. Patients were grouped by surgical approach; that is, open versus MIS. Successful MIS was defined by no conversion, R0 resection, and no major (grade 3 or greater) morbidity. Analyses by intent-to-treat assessed outcomes by Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher exact test. (Multivariable regression analysis identified variables that contributed to successful MIS resection.) ResultsOf 627 eligible patients, 360 (57%) had open and 267 (43%) had MIS procedures. Most patients (79.1%) received neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, and 21.9% were treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy alone or combined with chemotherapy. Among MIS resections, 179 (67%) were performed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and 88 (33%) by robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The conversion rate was 16% (n = 43). Successful MIS resection was achieved in 77% of patients. Multivariable regression analysis showed that pretreatment clinical N stage was a significant determinant of success, but not pretreatment clinical T stage or type of neoadjuvant therapy. ConclusionsFollowing neoadjuvant systemic therapy for clinical stage IB or IIIB non–small cell lung cancer, MIS resection can be successfully accomplished and should be considered in appropriate patients. Presence of pretreatment nodal disease is associated with higher odds of conversion, major morbidity, and incomplete resection.

Trends and comparative outcomes between operative approaches for segmentectomy in lung cancer

BackgroundSegmentectomy is increasingly performed for non–small cell lung cancer. However, comparative outcomes data among open, robotic-assisted, and video-assisted thoracoscopic approaches are limited. MethodsA retrospective cohort study of non–small cell lung cancer segmentectomy cases (2013-2021) from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database was performed. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting and compared by operative approach. Volume trends, outcomes, and nodal upstaging were assessed. ResultsOf 9927 patients who underwent segmentectomy, 84.8% underwent minimally invasive surgery, with robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery becoming the most common approach in 2019. Open segmentectomy is more likely to be performed at low-volume centers (P < .0001), whereas robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more likely to be performed at high-volume centers (P < .0001). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery had a higher open conversion rate than robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (odds ratio, 11.8; CI, 7.01-21.6; P < .001). Minimally invasive surgery had less 30-day morbidity compared with open segmentectomy (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.94; P = .013; robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery odds ratio, 0.59; CI, 0.43-0.81; P = .001). The number of nodes and stations harvested were highest for robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; however, N1 upstaging was more likely in open compared with robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (odds ratio, 0.63; CI, 0.45-0.89; P < .007) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (odds ratio, 0.61; CI, 0.46-0.83; P = .001). ConclusionsSegmentectomy volume has increased considerably, with robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery becoming the most common approach. Minimally invasive surgery has less major morbidity compared with open segmentectomy, with no difference between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. However, risk of open conversion is higher with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery had increased nodal harvest, whereas hilar nodal upstaging was highest with thoracotomy. This study reveals significant differences in outcomes exist between segmentectomy operative approach; the impact of approach on survival merits further investigation.

Robotic Surgery in Thoracic Training Programs: A National Needs Assessment

BackgroundCardiothoracic surgical trainees perceive a need for more instruction and exposure to robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery during their training. We sought to assess use and trainee exposure to robotic surgery in thoracic residency programs to identify areas for improvement. MethodsA voluntary electronic survey of 10 questions was distributed to surgeons working in all thoracic surgery residency programs in the United States. The survey asked respondents to provide the size of the residency, the availability and use of robots, and the trainee’s adoption of robotic surgery in their practice after graduation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. ResultsOf a total of 76 cardiothoracic surgery training programs, surgeons from 69 training programs (90.8%) completed the survey. Most pulmonary lobectomy was performed using robotic surgery (55%). Approximately half of the training programs (35 of 69) have a formal robotic curriculum for the residents. Of 121 thoracic track trainees, 118 (97.5%) performed robotic surgery as part of their practice, whereas 62 of 110 (56.4%) cardiothoracic track and 16 of 158 (10.1%) cardiac track trainees performed robotic surgery. In a multivariate analysis, the adoption of robotic surgery was associated with having an established robotic training curriculum (odds ratio, 5.82; 95% CI, 1.32-35.7) and a larger training program (odds ratio, 3.78; 95% CI, 1.34-10.6). ConclusionsA disparity exists in robotic surgical training among the training programs. A standardized curriculum and formal case requirements may be needed to ensure optimal preparation for future graduates.

A comparison of three-port and four-port Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: a retrospective study

BackgroundAt present, research comparing the short-term postoperative outcomes of anatomical resection in lung cancer under different ports of da Vinci robot-assisted surgery is insufficient. This report aimed to compare the outcomes of three-port and four-port da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for radical dissection of lung cancer.Methods171 consecutive patients who presented to our hospital from January 2020 to October 2021 with non-small cell lung cancer and treated with da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for radical resection of lung cancer were retrospectively collected and divided into the three-port group (n = 97) and the four-port group (n = 74). The general clinical data, perioperative data and life quality were individually compared between the two groups.ResultsAll the 171 patients successfully underwent surgeries. Compared to the four-port group, the three-port group had comparable baseline characteristics in terms of age, sex, tumor location, tumor size, history of chronic disease, pathological type, and pathological staging. The three-port group also had shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, lower chest tube drainage volume, shorter postoperative hospitalization stay durations, but showed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Postoperative 24, 48 and 72 h visual analogue scale pain scores were lower in the three-port group (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the hospitalization costs (P = 0.664), number or stations of total lymph node dissected (p > 0.05) and postoperative respiratory complications (P > 0.05).ConclusionsThe three-port robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is safe and effective and took better outcomes than the four-port robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in non-small cell lung cancer.

Lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery: a comparison between robot-assisted vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic approach.

TNM staging is the most important prognosticator for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Staging has significant implications for the treatment modality for these patients. Lymph node dissection in robot-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) surgery remains an area of ongoing evaluation. In this study, we aim to compare lymph node dissection in RATS and VATS approach for lung resection in NSCLC patients. We retrospectively compiled a database of 717 patients from July 31, 2015-July 7, 2022, who underwent either a wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy. We analysed the database according to lymph node dissection. The database was divided into RATS (n = 375) and VATS (n = 342) procedures. The mean number of lymph nodes harvested overall with RATS was 6.1 ± 1.5 nodes; with VATS approach, it was 5.53 ± 1.8 nodes. The mean number of N1 stations harvested was 2.66 ± 0.8 with RATS, 2.36 ± 0.9 with VATS. RATS approach showed statistically higher lymph node dissection rates compared to VATS (p = 0.002). Out of the 375 RATS procedures, 26 (6.4%) patients undergoing a RATS procedure were upstaged from N0/N1 staging to N2. N0/N1-N2 upstaging was reported in 28 of 342 (8.2%) patients undergoing a VATS procedure. The majority of upstaging was seen in N0-N2 disease: 19 of 375 (5%) for RATS and 23 of 342 (6.7%) for VATS. We conclude that in RATS procedures, there is a higher rate of lymph node dissection compared to VATS procedures. Upstaging was mostly seen in N0-N2 disease, this was observed at a higher rate with VATS procedures.

Feasibility and safety of uniport robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in initial series of anatomical pulmonary resections under learning curve.

Uniport robotic assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-RATS) is a recently adopted approach in thoracic surgery and is assumed to require a learning curve for surgeons because of technical difficulties. We aimed to verify the feasibility and safety of solo surgery in U-RATS in an initial series of patients, comparing with initial series of uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS). The surgical and post-operative outcomes of 25 U-RATS cases were compared with 25 U-VATS cases. The da Vinci Xi Surgical System was used for U-RATS procedure. In both groups, the skin incisions were 4cm in length, and a 30-degree camera was placed at the posterior and upper edges of the incision. Between June and December 2023, 25 patients with lung malignancies underwent anatomical pulmonary resection via U-RATS, including 13 lobectomies and 12 segmentectomies. Patient characteristics did not differ between the groups. The short-term outcomes were similar between the U-RATS and U-VATS groups, except for operation time (median: 214 vs. 157min, p = 0.0035). The pain scores on postoperative days 1 and 3 were significantly lower in patients who underwent U-RATS than in those who underwent U-VATS (median: 0 vs. 2, p = 0.010; median: 0 vs. 0, p = 0.027, respectively). The short-term outcomes are similar between the U-RATS and U-VATS groups, except for operation time. U-RATS is considered to be feasible and safe in the initial series of anatomical pulmonary resections performed by a surgeon who was under the learning curve.

Comparison of early postoperative patient-reported outcomes after multiportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer

IntroductionWe aimed to compare early postoperative patient-reported outcomes between multiportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (M-RATS) and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methodsSymptom severity and functional status were measured using the Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Lung Surgery at pre-surgery, during postoperative hospitalisation, and within 4 weeks of discharge. A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis of patients with NSCLC who were treated with M-RATS and U-VATS was performed. The symptom severity and daily functional status presented as proportion of moderate-to-severe scores on a 0-10-point scale, were compared using a generalised estimation equation model. ResultsWe enrolled 762 patients with NSCLC from a prospective cohort (CN-PRO-Lung 3), including 151 and 611 who underwent M-RATS and U-VATS, respectively, before PSM analysis. After 1:1 PSM, two groups of 148 patients each were created. Pain severity (P = 0.019) and activity limitation (P = 0.001) during hospitalisation were higher in the M-RATS group. However, no significant differences existed post-discharge in pain (P = 0.383), cough (P = 0.677), shortness of breath (P = 0.526), disturbed sleep (P = 0.525), drowsiness (P = 0.304), fatigue (P = 0.153), distress (P = 0.893), walking difficulty (P = 0.242), or activity limitation (P = 0.513). M-RATS caused less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.013), more stations of dissected lymph nodes (P = 0.001), more numbers of dissected lymph nodes (P = 0.001), and less tube drainage on the first postoperative day (P = 0.003) than U-VATS. ConclusionM-RATS and U-VATS achieved comparable symptom burden and functional impairment after discharge. However, compared to U-VATS, M-RATS was associated with more severe pain and activity limitation in the short postoperative period. Trial registration numberChiCTR2000033016.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone Intercostal Nerve Blocks for Robotic Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Introduction For peripheral nerve blocks, using either the liposomal formulation of bupivacaine or plain bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone as an adjuvant has been shown to improve postoperative pain scores. In a single-blinded, randomized controlled study of patients undergoing robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, we determined if bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone was noninferior to liposomal bupivacaine mixed with plain bupivacaine when administered intraoperatively as an intercostal nerve block (INB). Methods A total of 34 patients undergoing robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were randomized to receive one of two injectate mixtures during their intraoperative INB. Group LB was administered 266 mg of 13.3 mg/mL liposomal bupivacaine with 24 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine, while Group BD was given 42 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine and 8 mg of dexamethasone. The primary outcomes were mean postoperative numerical pain ratings and mean postoperative opioid analgesic requirements. Secondary outcomes included adjuvant pain medication consumption, hospital length of stay, and total opioid use in oral morphine equivalents. Results Group LB exhibited no significant difference in pain scores (p = 0.437) and opioid analgesic requirement (p = 0.095) within the 72-hour postoperative period when compared to Group BD. The median total postoperative opioid requirement was 90 mg in Group LB, compared to 45 mg in Group BD. There were no significant differences in the use of postoperative adjuvant pain medications (gabapentin, p = 0.833; acetaminophen, p = 0.190; ketorolac, p = 0.699). Hospital length of stay did not differ between the groups. Conclusions INBs with the addition of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine provided noninferior postoperative analgesia compared to liposomal bupivacaine mixed with plain 0.5% bupivacaine.

Pulmonary presentation and coil marcation of dirofilaria lung coin nodes - case report.

Clinicians face significant diagnostic challenges when dealing with nodal lesions of the lung. The majority of lung nodules are benign; however, asignificant number can be cancerous. Dirofilaria infestation should also be considered in the differential diagnosis of nodal lung lesions. Most patients with Dirofilaria infestation are asymptomatic. To determine the etiology of nodal lung infiltrations, procedures like radiological imaging, bronchoscopy, endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), transthoracic biopsy (TTB), tumor markers, nonspecific serological tests, or surgical removal of the lung coin lesions can be performed. Coil marking of the smaller lung lesions under computed tomography (CT) guidance is ahelpful tool in determining the position and localization of the nodal lung lesions. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) wedge resection is adiagnostic and therapeutic method of choice. No additional treatment of Dirofilaria other than wedge resection of the lung is necessary.

Sex-based disparities in patients with lung cancer undergoing lobectomy via robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

e20005 Background: The 2023 report from the World Health Organization(WHO) ranked lung cancer (LC) as the top cause of cancer-related fatalities worldwide. Recently, minimally invasive procedures such as robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) have been introduced as part of the treatment of some LC cases. Our study aims to bridge the understanding of potential sex-based disparities among LC patients undergoing lobectomy via RATS. Methods: We analyzed the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for adult lung cancer(malignant or carcinoma in situ) patients with a principal procedure code of lobectomy with RATS. Cases with underlying mycoses, mycobacterial infection, and pulmonary abscesses were excluded based on recommendations from prior studies. Multivariate regression models helped evaluate sex-based differences in several complications. Results: An estimated 26385 lung cancer patients underwent lobectomy via RATS, consisting of 56.68% females (14955 cases) and 43.32% males (11430 cases). Age differences were noted as females were younger (mean age 67.80 years vs. 69.14 years, p &lt; 0.01). We also found that females were less likely to report several complications, such as acute kidney injury (AKI) (3% vs. 6.6%, aOR 0.538, p &lt; 0.001), pneumonia (2.8% vs. 4.3%, aOR 0.725, p &lt; 0.001), post-procedural air leak (9.2% vs. 11.2%, aOR 0.797, p &lt; 0.001), post-procedural cardiac arrest (0.6 % vs. 1.6%, aOR 0.349, p &lt; 0.001), pulmonary embolism (0.2% vs. 0.5%, aOR 0.345, p &lt; 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (DVT)(1.5% vs. 2.2%, aOR 0.742, p: 0.003), atrial fibrillation (AF)(13% vs 21.7%, aOR 0.564, p &lt; 0.001), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (0.2% vs. 0.5%, aOR 0.58, p:0.027), and death (0.3% vs. 0.9%, aOR 0.505, p &lt; 0.001). Notably, females were more likely to have an open procedure conversion (0.2% vs 0.1%, aOR 2.235, p:0.017). However, there is no significant difference between the two sexes regarding post-procedural pneumothorax and respiratory failure, atelectasis, supraventricular tachycardia, and events of acute ischemic stroke. Conclusions: Our most recent analysis confirms that among LC patients undergoing lobectomy via RATS, males were more prone to several complications than females. However, we also found that females were more likely to necessitate an open procedure conversion. We, therefore, advocate for further research to enhance our understanding of such disparities and strategies to address them effectively.

Surgical treatment of thymic epithelial tumors: a narrative review.

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are scarce neoplasms of the prevascular mediastinum. Included in this diverse category of lesions are thymomas and thymic carcinomas (TCs). Surgery is the mainstay of treatment of tumors that are deemed resectable. However, up till now, optimal surgical access has been a subject of debate. The advent of new techniques, such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), challenged the median sternotomy which was traditionally considered the access of choice. This review aims to demonstrate the current evidence concerning the surgical treatment of TET and to enlighten other controversial issues about surgery. PubMed research was conducted using the terms [surgery] AND [thymic epithelial tumors] OR [thymomas] and [surgical treatment] AND [thymic epithelial tumors] OR [thymomas]. Papers concerning pediatric cases and non-English literature papers were excluded. Individual case reports were also excluded. Minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIST) such as VATS and RATS are increasingly applied in early-stage TET. Although numerous published studies have demonstrated better perioperative outcomes in early-stage TET, long-term follow-up data are still required to demonstrate the oncological equivalent of MIST to open surgery. Resection of stage III TET is more challenging. Thymectomy can be expanded en bloc to include the major vascular structures, lung, pleura, phrenic, or vagus nerve in these individuals. There is no agreement on the ideal surgical access and traditionally these patients underwent open sternotomy, sometimes combined with a thoracic access. Evidence concerning the treatment of stage IVA disease is mainly derived from retrospective case series which are highly heterogeneous in terms of the number of enrolled patients, histology, degree of pleural involvement, and timing of presentation. New techniques in the field of minimally invasive surgery are gaining acceptance for early-stage TET but longer follow-up periods are warranted to prove their oncological outcomes. On the contrary, these techniques should be used cautiously in case of locally advanced tumors. Surgeons must not forget that the main objective is the complete resection of the lesion, which is one major predictive factor for increased survival.

Presentation and management of delayed bronchopleural fistula after pulmonary lobectomy: a case report

BackgroundLung cancer is the second most diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Surgical lung resection is the best treatment modality in the early stages of lung cancer as well as in some locally advanced cases. Postoperative air leak is one of the most common complications after pulmonary resection with incidence ranging between 20 and 33%. The majority of air leaks seal, within 5 days after surgery, on their own by conservative management. However, at least 5% of patients still have prolonged air coming out from the residual lung at discharge. This report describes the management of a thin lady with right lung cancer who underwent a right lower lobectomy and then suffered from a delayed air leak 7 weeks after surgery and required extensive thoracic and general surgery collaboration.Case presentationA 72-year-old heavy smoker female patient diagnosed with stage I lung cancer underwent right robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery converted to thoracotomy because of a fused fissure, right lower lobectomy, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy presented with delayed air leak 49 days after surgery. VATS decortication and mechanical pleurodesis were done 2 weeks after unsuccessful conservative treatment. Still, the lung failed to expand four weeks later so the patient was sent to surgery; she is underweight (BMI of 18) with not many options for a big flap to fill the chest cavity empty space. Accordingly; the decision was to use multiple pedicle flaps; omentum, intercostal muscle, and serratus anterior muscle to cover the bronchopleural fistulas and fill the pleural space in addition to mechanical and chemical pleurodesis. Full expansion of the lung was obtained. The patient was discharged on Post-Operative day 5 without remnant pneumothorax.ConclusionsAir leaks After lobectomy usually presents directly postoperatively; various management options are available ranging from conservative and minimally invasive to major operative treatment. We presented what we believe was unusual delayed bronchopleural fistula post-lobectomy in a thin lady which demonstrates clearly how a delayed air leak was detected and how collaborative efforts were crucial for delivering high-quality, safe, and patient-centered care till treated and complete recovery.

Early patient-reported outcomes after robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) can achieve traditional clinical outcomes comparable to those of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during the early period after RATS and VATS remain unclear. This study aimed to utilize longitudinal electronic PRO (ePRO) assessments to evaluate symptom burden and functional status between these approaches from patients' perspective. This study comprised patients who underwent lobectomy via RATS or VATS for non-small cell lung cancer. We collected multiple-time-point PROs data from the prospective longitudinal study via an ePRO system. Symptom severity and function status were assessed using the perioperative symptom assessment for patients undergoing lung surgery and were analyzed between groups using linear mixed-effects models. Of the 164 patients, 42 underwent RATS and 122 underwent VATS. After propensity score matching (PSM), 42 RATS and 84 VATS exhibited similar baseline characteristics. During the 7-day postoperative period, participants underwent RATS reported milder pain (p = 0.014), coughing (p < 0.001), drowsiness (p = 0.001), and distress (p = 0.045) compared with those underwent VATS. Moreover, participants in RATS group showed less functional interference with walking (p < 0.001) and general activity (p < 0.001). RATS exhibited a shorter postoperative hospitalization (p = 0.021) but higher hospital cost (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, short-term clinical outcomes of operative time, dissected lymph node stations, chest tube drainage, and postoperative complication rates were comparable. PROs are important metrics for assessing patients' recovery after lobectomy. Compared with VATS, RATS may induce less symptom burden and better functional status for patients in the early postoperative period.

Are routine, daily chest radiographs (CXR) necessary following (VATS and RATS) lobectomies?

BackgroundConsensus guidelines regarding the amount and necessity of post-operative imaging in thoracic surgery are lacking. The efficacy of daily chest radiographs (CXR) following video-assisted (VATS) and robotic-assisted (RATS) thoracoscopic surgery in directing management has not been previously studied. We hypothesize that abnormal clinical findings, rather than abnormal imaging findings, better predict post-operative complications in patients undergoing VATS/RATS lobectomies. MethodsA retrospective review of VATS and RATS lobectomy patients were performed at a tertiary referral center from 1/1/2019–12/31/2021. Demographics, hospital course, and imaging were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square test, Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Our outcomes were post-operative complications requiring a procedure and extended length of stay (LOS) (>2 days post-operatively). ResultsOut of 362 VATS/RATS lobectomy patients, 15 patients had post-operative complications requiring a procedure. Almost all patients who required a procedure had abnormal clinical signs and symptoms (14/15; p < 0.001) while 70 % had expected post-operative day (POD) one CXR findings (11/15; p = 0.463). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated clinical signs and symptoms independently predicted procedural requirement (odds ratio [OR] = 48, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]:8.5–267) while abnormal POD one imaging did not. For extended LOS, a positive smoking history (OR = 4.4, 95 % CI:1.4–14.1), number of CXRs (OR = 2.4, 95 % CI:1.8–3.2) and thoracostomy tubes (OR = 5.3, 95 % CI:1.0–27.3) were independent predictors while clinical signs and symptoms was not. ConclusionAbnormal clinical findings may guide management more predictably than abnormal CXRs after VATS/RATS. Routine CXR in the post-operative setting may be unnecessary in those without clinical signs or symptoms. Key messageThere are no consensus guidelines regarding the efficacy of routine, post-operative diagnostic studies after major thoracic lobar resections. The presence of abnormal signs or symptoms after minimally invasive lobectomies may better predict those who will require additional procedures better than the presence of abnormal routine, post-operative chest radiographs.