Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy Research Articles

Application of 3D printing surgical training models in the preoperative assessment of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

BackgroundTo explore the application effect of 3D printing surgical training models in the preoperative assessment of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.MethodsEighty patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy surgery between January 2022 and December 2023 were selected and divided into two groups according to the chronological order. The control group (n = 40) received preoperative assessment with verbal and video education from January 2022 to December 2022, while the observation group (n = 40) received preoperative assessment with 3D printing surgical training models combined with verbal and video education from January 2023 to December 2023. The preoperative anxiety, information demand score, and surgical awareness were compared between the two groups. The physiological stress indicators, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), angiotensin II (AT II), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol (Cor), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR), were also measured at different time points before and after surgery.They were 6:00 am on the day before surgery (T0), 6:00 am on the day of the operation (T1), 6:00 am on the first day after the operation (T2), and 6:00 am on the third day after the operation (T3).The preparation rate before surgery was compared between the two groups.ResultsThe anxiety and surgical information demand scores were lower in the observation group than in the control group before anesthesia induction, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Both groups had lower scores before anesthesia induction than before preoperative assessment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The physiological stress indicators at T1 time points were lower in the observation group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The overall means of the physiological stress indicators differed significantly between the two groups (P < 0.001). Compared with the T0 time point, the T1, T2, and T3 time points in both groups were significantly lower, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The surgical awareness and preparation rate before surgery were higher in the observation group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).ConclusionThe preoperative assessment mode using 3D printing surgical training models combined with verbal and video education can effectively reduce the psychological and physiological stress responses of surgical patients, improve their surgical awareness, and enhance the preparation rate before surgery.

3D virtual model for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in highly-complex cases (PADUA ⩾ 10).

To compare two cohorts of patients submitted to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for highly-complex renal masses (PADUA ⩾ 10) with versus without the use of 3DVMs. We screened a prospective consecutive cohort of 152 patients submitted to RAPN with 3DVM and 1264 patients submitted to RAPN without 3DVM between 2019 and 2022. Only PADUA ⩾ 10 cases were considered eligible for analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was applied. Primary endpoint was to evaluate whereas RAPNs with 3DVM were superior in terms of functional outcomes at 12-month. Secondary outcomes were to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVA) tested the associations of clinically significant eGFR drop and 3DVMs. Subgroups analysis was performed for PAUDA-risk categories. Thirty seven patients for each group were analyzed after PSM. RAPN with 3DVM presented a higher rate of selective/no clamping procedure (32.5% vs 16.2%, p = 0.03) and a higher enucleation rate (43.2% vs 29.8%, p = 0.04). Twelve-month functional preservation performed better within 3DVM group in terms of creatinine serum level (median 1.2 [IQR 1.1-1.4] vs 1.6 [IQR 1.1-1.8], p = 0.03) and eGFR (median 64.6 [IQR 56.2-74.1] vs 52.3 [IQR 49.2-74.1], p = 0.03). MVA confirmed 3DVM as a protective factor for clinically significant eGFR drop in this subgroup of patients. RAPN performed with the use of 3DVM assistance for PADUA ⩾ 10 cases resulted in lower incidence of global ischemia and higher rate of enucleations. The positive impact of such technology was found at 12-month follow-up.

Three-dimensional virtual model for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis with a contemporary control group

PurposeTo compare two cohorts of patients submitted to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with vs without the use of three-dimensional virtual models (3DVMs).MethodsWe screened a prospective consecutive cohort of 152 patients submitted to RAPN with 3DVM and 1264 patients submitted to RAPN without 3DVM between 2019 and 2022. Propensity score matching analysis (PSMA) was applied. Primary endpoint was to evaluate whereas RAPNs with 3DVM were superior in terms of functional outcomes at 12-month. Secondary endopoints were to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVA) tested the associations of clinically significant eGFR drop and 3DVMs. Subgroups analysis was performed for PAUDA-risk categories.Results100 patients for each group were analyzed after PSMA. RAPN with 3DVM presented a higher rate of selective/no clamping procedure (32% vs 16%, p = 0.03) and a higher enucleation rate (40% vs 29%, p = 0.04). As concern to primary endopoint, 12-month functional preservation performed better within 3DVM group in terms of creatinine serum level (median 1.2 [IQR 1.1–1.4] vs 1.6 [IQR 1.1–1.8], p = 0.03) and eGFR (median 64.6 [IQR 56.2–74.1] vs 52.3 [IQR 49.2–74.1], p = 0.03). However, this result was confirmed only in the PADUA ≥ 10 renal masses. Regarding secondary endpoints, no significative difference emerged between the two cohorts. MVA confirmed 3DVM as a protective factor for clinically significant eGFR drop only in high-risk (PADUA ≥ 10) masses.ConclusionsRAPN performed with the use of 3DVM assistance resulted in lower incidence of global ischemia and higher rate of enucleations. The positive impact of such technology was found at 12-month only in high-risk renal masses.

Da Vinci and Hugo RAS Platforms for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a preliminary prospective comparative analysis of the outcomes.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has emerged as the preferred approach for T1 renal-cell-carcinoma. As new robotic platforms like Hugo RAS emerge, we seek to understand their potential in achieving similar RAPN outcomes as the established Da Vinci system. A prospective single-center comparative study was conducted, and 50 patients selected for RAPN were enrolled (25 Da Vinci Xi; 25 Hugo RAS). The choice of robotic system was based solely on hospital logistics criteria. Surgeries were performed by expert surgeons. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, operative details and postoperative outcomes were collected. SPSS version 22.0 was used for statistical analyses. The average age of patients was 62.52±9.47 years, with no significant differences in median age, sex, and nephrometry scores between groups. Da Vinci group showed a significantly shorter docking time (12.56 vs. 20.08 min; P<0.01), while other intraoperative measures like console time and warm ischemia time were similar. The Hugo RAS group had a shorter renorraphy time (14.33 vs. 18.84 min; P=0.024). Postoperative outcomes and surgical margin positivity showed no significant differences. Each group had one patient (4%) who developed major surgical complications (Clavien IIIa). Trifecta rates were comparable between both groups (Da Vinci 88% vs. Hugo RAS 84%; P=0.93). Initial findings suggest similar perioperative outcomes for RAPN when using Hugo RAS compared to the Da Vinci system. Further research with long-term follow-up is necessary to evaluate oncological and functional outcomes.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in younger versus older adults with renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Our study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between younger and older patients after adjusting for their background differences. We particularly assessed RAPN outcomes and safety in older patients. We retrospectively evaluated 559 patients clinically diagnosed with T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and treated with RAPN between 2013 and 2022 at five institutions in Japan. The patients were classified into two groups according to their age during surgery (younger group: < 75years, older group: ≥ 75years). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for the differences in the backgrounds between younger and older patients, and surgical outcomes were compared. Among the 559 patients, 422 (75.5%) and 137 (24.5%) were classified into the younger and older groups, respectively; 204 and 102 patients from the younger and older groups were matched according to PSM, respectively. Subsequently, patient characteristics other than age were not significantly different between the two groups. In the matched cohort, the older group had more patients with major complications (younger, 3.0%; older, 8.8%; P = 0.045). Surgical outcomes of RAPN in older patients with RCC were comparable with those in younger patients, although older patients experiencedsignificantly more complications than younger patients. These results suggest the need for further detailed preoperative evaluation and appropriate postoperative management in older patients receiving RAPN.

Impact of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy with Single Layer versus Double Layer Renorrhaphy on Postoperative Renal Function.

We aimed to investigate the differences in renal function between patients who underwent single inner-layer renorrhaphy (SILR) or double-layer renorrhaphy (DLR) among those with renal tumors who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted between November 2018 and October 2023 at two institutions and included patients who underwent RAPN. In total, 93 eligible patients who underwent RAPN were analyzed. Preoperative renal function and prevalence of chronic kidney disease were not significantly different between the two groups. Although urinary leakage was observed in three patients (5.9%) in the SILR group, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding surgical outcomes (p = 0.249). Serum creatinine levels after RAPN were significantly lower in the SILR group than in the DLR group on postoperative days 1 and 365 following RAPN (p = 0.04). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly lower in the DLR group than in the SILR group only on postoperative day 1; however, there was no significant difference between the two groups thereafter. Multivariate analysis showed that the method of renorrhaphy was not a predictor for maintaining renal function after RAPN even though it was associated with eGFR on postoperative day 1.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients aged 75 years or older – comparing the risk of complications with their younger counterparts

Background & aimMore elderly patients are diagnosed with kidney tumors where partial nephrectomy is technically possible. We investigated whether patients ≥ 75 years old had an increased risk of complications following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) compared to younger patients.MethodsRetrospective, consecutive study including patients who underwent RAPN between May 2016 – April 2023. Preoperative data, operative data and complications within 90 days were recorded by patient record review. Complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo (CD).Results451 patients underwent RAPN and a postoperative complication was recorded in 131 (29%) patients of which 28 (6%) were CD ≥ III. Any postoperative complication was recorded in 24/113 patients (21%) < 55 years, 40/127 patients (31%) 55–64 years, 45/151 patients (42%) 65–74 years, and 22/60 patients (37%) ≥ 75 years. Comparable numbers for a CD ≥ III postoperative complication were 2/113 (2%) < 55 years, 6/127 (7%) 55–64 years, 12/151 (8%) 65–74 years, and 5/60 (8%) ≥ 75 years. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients ≥ 75 years had a non-significant increased risk of complications when controlling for preoperative variables (OR 1.82 [95% CI 0.80–4.13]) or perioperative variables (OR 1.98 [95% CI 0.86–4.58]) compared to patients < 55 years. Two patients died postoperatively. Both were ≥ 75 years (2/60, 3%).Discussion and conclusionsSelected patients ≥ 75 years can undergo RAPN without a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications. However, a mortality rate of 3% in this age group indicates that these patients are frail when postoperative complications occur.

A commentary on 'Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and classical open partial nephrectomy'.

A commentary on 'Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and classical open partial nephrectomy'.

Letter to the editor: Comparison of postoperative glomerular filtration rate between robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN).

Letter to the editor: Comparison of postoperative glomerular filtration rate between robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN).

Current status and challenges of 3D navigation in partial nephrectomy

Partial nephrectomy, a standard treatment for small renal cancers, has evolved through minimally invasive procedures such as laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. The use of three-dimensional (3D) kidney models derived from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images has been investigated to improve surgical outcomes. This review explores various navigation techniques, such as 3D printing, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR), to address organ movement and deformation challenges during surgery. Despite the promising positive impact of these methods, as revealed by a systematic review in 2022, achieving the desired navigation accuracy remains elusive. The use of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality, capable of overlaying the 3D model onto the surgical image in real-time, has shown potential. Still, we need advanced techniques, for instance, non-rigid 3D models employing nonlinear parametric deformation, to adapt to organ deformation. Additionally, the application of deep learning from artificial intelligence for high accuracy 3D navigation is an emerging area of interest. Although considerable progress has been achieved, a comprehensive, widely adoptable solution has yet to be discovered. The paper underscores the necessity for ongoing research and development in 3D navigation methods, anticipating their substantial contribution to future surgical procedures.

Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of Open vs. Robot-Assisted Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Scored Match Analysis.

Off-clamp partial nephrectomy represents one of the latest developments in nephron-sparing surgery, with the goal of preserving renal function and reducing ischemia time. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the functional, oncologic, and perioperative outcomes between off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (off-C RAPN) and off-clamp open partial nephrectomy (off-C OPN) through a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. A 1:1 PSM analysis was used to balance variables potentially affecting postoperative outcomes. To report surgical quality, 1 year trifecta was used. Univariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of trifecta achievement. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) probabilities between groups. Overall, 542 patients were included. After PSM analysis, two homogeneous cohorts of 147 patients were obtained. The off-C RAPN cohort experienced shorter length of stay (LoS) (3.4 days vs. 5.4 days; p < 0.001), increased likelihoods of achieving 1 year trifecta (89.8% vs. 80.3%; p = 0.03), lower postoperative Clavien-Dindo ≤ 2 complications (1.3% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001), and lower postoperative transfusion rates (3.4% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.008). At univariable analysis, the surgical approach (off-C RAPN vs. off-C OPN, OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.09-4.46, p = 0.02) was the only predictor of 1 year trifecta achievement. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, no differences were observed between the two groups in terms of OS (log-rank p = 0.451), CSS (log-rank p = 0.476), DFS (log-rank p = 0.678), and MFS (log-rank p = 0.226). Comparing RAPN and OPN in a purely off-clamp scenario, the minimally invasive approach proved to be a feasible and safe surgical approach, with a significantly lower LoS and minor rate of postoperative complications and transfusions as a result of improved surgical quality expressed by higher 1 year trifecta achievement.

Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of abdominal drain placement (vs. omission) on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), focusing on complications, time to canalization, deambulation, and pain management. A prospectively-maintained institutional database was queried to get data of patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses between January 2018 and May 2023 at our Institution. Baseline, surgical, and postoperative data were collected. Retrieved patients were stratified based upon placement of abdominal drain (Y/N). Descriptive analyses comparing the two groups were conducted as appropriate. After adjusting for potential confounders, a logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate significant predictors of any grade and “major” complications. 342 patients were included: 192 patients in the “drain group” versus 150 patients in the “no-drain” group. Renal masses were larger (p < 0.001) and at higher complexity (RENAL score, p = 0.01), in the drain group. Procedures in the drain group had statistically significantly longer operative time, ischemia time, and higher blood loss (all p-values < 0.001). The urinary collecting system was more likely involved compared to the no-drain group (p = 0.01). At multivariate analysis, abdominal drainage was not a significant predictor of any grade (OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.33–1.87) and major postoperative complications (OR 3.62, 95%CI 0.53–9.68). Patients in the drain group experienced a statistically significantly higher hemoglobin drop (p < 0.01). Moreover, they exhibited statistically significant higher paracetamol consumption (p < 0.001) and need for additional opioids (p = 0.02). In summary, the study results suggest the safety of omitting drain placement and remark on the need for personalized decision-making, which considers patient and procedural factors.

Skill Transfer from Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy to the Hugo™ RAS System: A Novel Proficiency Score to Assess Surgical Quality during the Learning Curve.

Background/Objectives: The absence of validated tools to assess the skill transfer from laparoscopy to robotic surgery remains an unsolved issue in the context of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We aimed to describe and validate a novel proficiency score to critically evaluate the surgical quality of RAPN with the Hugo™ RAS System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Methods: Between October 2022 and September 2023, 27 consecutive patients underwent off-clamp RAPN for localized renal tumors at our institution. To analyze the learning curve (LC), the cohort was chronologically divided into two phases of 6 months each. Proficiency was defined as the achievement of trifecta while maintaining a comparable intraoperative time in the interquartile range of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed by the same surgeon. A logistic binary regression model was built to identify predictors of proficiency achievement. Results: A proficiency score was achieved in 14 patients (74.1%). At univariable analysis, number of consecutive procedures > 12 (OR 13.7; 95%CI 2.05-21.1, p = 0.007), pathological tumor size (OR 0.92; 95%CI 0.89-0.99, p = 0.04) and essential blood hypertension (OR 0.16; 95%CI 0.03-0.82, p = 0.02) were found to be predictors of proficiency score. At multivariable analysis, after adjusting for potential confounding factors, number of consecutive procedures > 12 (OR 8.1; 95%CI 1.44-14.6, p = 0.03) was the only independent predictor of proficiency score achievement. Conclusions: Our results showed that the skills of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon are transferrable to the novel Hugo™ RAS System in the context of nephron-sparing surgery. Improved surgical quality may be expected after completing the first 12 consecutive procedures.

Body mass index influence on short-term perioperative results in robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in obese and non-obese patients. Through March 2024, we executed an exhaustive search in internationally acclaimed databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, limiting our scope to publications in English. We discarded review articles, protocols lacking empirical data, conference abstracts, and materials not pertinent to our research. Our analytical framework utilized the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method alongside a random-effects model for evaluating dichotomous variables' mean differences, expressed through odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We established statistical significance at a P value below 0.05. The comprehensive meta-analysis incorporated data from eight cohort studies, collectively assessing 3657 patients. Findings indicated that, relative to individuals of normal weight, those in the obese category had prolonged operative durations (WMD -25.68 95% CI -42.07 to -9.29; P = 0.002), increased estimated blood loss (WMD -48.55ml, 95% CI -78.27 to -18.83; P = 0.001), and longer warm ischemia times (WMD -1.11, 95% CI -2.03 to -0.19; P = 0.02). However, no significant disparities were observed in hospital stay duration, intraoperative and total postoperative complications, severe postoperative complications, or alterations in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Our findings conclude that robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) represents a viable and safe surgical approach for obese patients. This assertion is backed by the observation that crucial metrics, including postoperative renal function alterations, surgical complication rates, and hospitalization duration, exhibit no substantial variances when juxtaposed with counterparts of normal weight.

The Prognostic Impact of the Surgical Margin in Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Partial Nephrectomy: A Multi-Center Study.

Background: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the preferred treatment for small, localized kidney tumors. Incomplete resection resulting in positive surgical margins (PSM) can occur after PN. The impact of PSM on the risk of recurrence and survival outcomes is not fully understood. We aimed to explore the relationship between PSM, the risk of recurrence and impact on survival after PN in a large multicenter cohort from Denmark. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent PN for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at three departments in Denmark between 2010 and 2016. Data including pathological features, surgical techniques, and patient follow-up was retrieved from electronic medical health records and national databases. We used a combination of descriptive statistics, comparative analysis (comparisons were carried out by Mann-Whitney Test, independent Student's t-test, or Pearson's chi-Square Test), univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and survival analysis methods. Results: A total of 523 patients were included, of which 48 (9.1%) had a PSM. Recurrence was observed in 55 patients (10.5%). Median follow-up time was 75 months. We found a lower incidence of PSM with robot-assisted PN (p = 0.01) compared to open or laparoscopic PN. PSM was associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared to negative margins in univariate analysis, but not multivariate analysis. However, the study was underpowered to describe this association with other risk factors. Overall survival did not differ between patients with PSM and negative margins. Conclusions: Our study presents further evidence on the negative impact of PSM on recurrence after PN for RCC, highlighting the importance of achieving NSM, thus potentially improving clinical outcomes. A surgical approach was found to be the only predictive factor influencing the risk of PSMs, with a reduced risk observed with robot-assisted laparoscopy.

Trifecta Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Using the New Hugo™ RAS System Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy.

(1) Background: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is still performed in many referred urological institutions, representing a valid alternative to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We aimed to compare trifecta outcomes of LPN and RAPN with the Hugo™ RAS System. (2) Methods: Between October 2022 and September 2023, eighty-nine patients underwent minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (group A, RAPN = 27; group B, Laparoscopic PN = 62) for localized renal tumors at our Institution. Continuous variables were presented as median and IQR and compared by means of the Mann-Whitney U test, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies (%) and compared by means of the χ2 test. (3) Results: Group A showed a higher rate of male patients (81.5% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.04) and a higher trend towards larger clinical tumor size (34 vs. 29 mm, p = 0.14). All the other baseline variables were comparable between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Regarding post-operative data, group A displayed a lower operative time (92 vs. 149.5 min, p = 0.005) and a shorter hospital stay (3 vs. 5, p = 0.002). A higher rate of malignant pathology was evidenced in group A (77.8% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.07) as well as a lower trend towards positive surgical margins (3.7% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.82), even if not statistically significant. (4) Conclusions: The rate of trifecta achievement was 92.6% and 82.3% for group A and B (p = 0.10), respectively. In terms of trifecta outcomes, RAPN using the Hugo™ RAS System showed comparable results to LPN performed by the same experienced surgeon.

Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and classical open partial nephrectomy.

Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has emerged as a promising alternative to classical partial nephrectomy (CPN). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of RAPN and CPN for treating localized renal tumors through a meta-analysis of available literature. Chinese databases, such as CNKI, Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals Database (VIP), and Wanfang Full-text Database, were searched using Chinese search terms, and all published articles on PubMed and Web of Science were searched using English search terms. Articles on Localized Renal Tumors were included. RevMan5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. The funnel plots were drawn using Stata software to assess publication bias. This study aimed to identify the differences between robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy and classic partial nephrectomy in patients with localized renal tumors. In total, 67 articles with 17677 patients were included. The results demonstrate the advantages of RAPN over CPN for localized renal tumors. Compared to CPN and RAPN had significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay duration, incidence of perioperative complications, and proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion. Regarding surgical outcomes, RAPN showed more favorable results regarding the incidence of positive resection margins, postoperative decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), postoperative local recurrence rate, and proportion of Trifecta achieved. However, there was no significant difference between RAPN and CPN regarding 5-year tumor-specific survival rates. The study suggests that robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is a viable alternative to classic surgery for renal tumors. The strengths of this study are the use of a comprehensive search strategy and the inclusion of studies published in both English and Chinese. The limitations of this study are the small sample size and the need for long-term follow-up data. RAPN and CPN have similar overall survival outcomes for treating localized renal tumors. However, RAPN may offer advantages in terms of perioperative outcomes and preservation of renal function. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to identify the optimal surgical approach for individual patients.

Development and validation of metrics for a new RAPN training model.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a complex and index procedure that urologists need to learn how to perform safely. No validated performance metrics specifically developed for a RAPN training model (TM) exist. A Core Metrics Group specifically adapted human RAPN metrics to be used in a newly developed RAPN TM, explicitly defining phases, steps, errors, and critical errors. A modified Delphi meeting concurred on the face and content validation of the new metrics. One hundred percent consensus was achieved by the Delphi panel on 8 Phases, 32 Steps, 136 Errors and 64 Critical Errors. Two trained assessors evaluated recorded video performances of novice and expert RAPN surgeons executing an emulated RAPN in the newly developed TM. There were no differences in procedure Steps completed by the two groups. Experienced RAPN surgeons made 34% fewer Total Errors than the Novice group. Performance score for both groups was divided at the median score using Total Error scores, into HiError and LoError subgroups. The LowErrs Expert RAPN surgeons group made 118% fewer Total Errors than the Novice HiErrs group. Furthermore, the LowErrs Expert RAPN surgeons made 77% fewer Total Errors than the HiErrs Expert RAPN surgeons. These results established construct and discriminative validity of the metrics. The authors described a novel RAPN TM and its associated performance metrics with evidence supporting their face, content, construct, and discriminative validation. This report and evidence support the implementation of a simulation-based proficiency-based progression (PBP) training program for RAPN.

Renal anatomical classification systems cannot predict the occurrence of vascular complications after partial nephrectomy.

To determine the relationship between renal tumor complexity and vascular complications after partial nephrectomy using PADUA, RENAL, and ZS scores. Between January 2007 and December 2018, a total of 1917 patients with available cross-sectional imaging were enrolled in the study. Logistic regressions were used to identify independent predictors of vascular complications. Of 1917 patients, 31 (1.6%) developed vascular complications, including 10 females and 21 males. The high-complexity category was significantly associated with a decreased risk of vascular complication in PADUA (OR = 0.256; 95%CI = 0.086-0.762; P = 0.014) and ZS score (OR = 0.279; 95%CI = 0.083-0.946; P = 0.040). Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy were independent risk factors for vascular complications. Meanwhile, the incidence was significantly reduced in the recent 4years in the high score tumor group alone in PADUA (0.2% [1/474] vs. 2.2% [3/139], P = 0.038) and ZS score (0.2% [1/469] vs. 2.7% [3/112], P = 0.024). In the first 8years, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy were the only two independent risk factors for vascular complications. In the recent 4years, only the high-complexity category was significantly associated with a decreased risk of vascular complication in the PADUA score (OR = 0.110; 95%CI = 0.013-0.938; P = 0.044). The renal anatomic classification system cannot predict the occurrence of vascular complications after partial nephrectomy.

Time-Driven Activity-based Costing and Outcomes of Same-Day Discharge vs Inpatient Robotic Partial and Radical Nephrectomy

ObjectiveTo assess the outcomes, total healthcare utilization, and cost savings for same-day discharge versus inpatient robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and robotic assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN). MethodsWe compared 146 RAPNs and 65 RARNs consecutively performed as same-day discharge (RAPN=21, RARN=9) versus inpatient (RAPN=125, RARN=56) from April 2015 to May 2023 at two academic medical centers. We collected baseline demographics, perioperative characteristics, and 30-day complications. We applied the Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) analysis to compare total costs of RAPN and PARN throughout the cycle of care, including inpatient vs same-day discharge. ResultsBaseline demographics and comorbidities were similar between patients undergoing inpatient versus same-day discharge RAPN and RARN. One Clavien-Dindo grade II complication (3.3%) requiring re-admission due to wound infection for antibiotics occurred after same-day discharge RAPN; no complications occurred after same-day discharge RARN. Two unscheduled office or ED visits (6.7%) occurred after same-day discharge RAPN for surgical-site infection and urinary retention. Same-day discharge versus inpatient RAPN and RARN demonstrated a $3,091 (18%) and $4,003 (25%) overall cost reduction, respectively. ConclusionSame-day discharge RAPN and RARN result in cost savings of 18-25% without a difference in complications, and thereby improves value-based care for appropriately selected patients.