RNA-DNA Differences Research Articles

RNA-DNA differences in variant calls from cattle tissues result in erroneous eQTLs

BackgroundAssociation testing between molecular phenotypes and genomic variants can help to understand how genotype affects phenotype. RNA sequencing provides access to molecular phenotypes such as gene expression and alternative splicing while DNA sequencing or microarray genotyping are the prevailing options to obtain genomic variants.ResultsWe genotype variants for 74 male Braunvieh cattle from both DNA (~ 13-fold coverage) and deep total RNA sequencing from testis, vas deferens, and epididymis tissue (~ 250 million reads per tissue). We show that RNA sequencing can be used to identify approximately 40% of variants (7–10 million) called from DNA sequencing, with over 80% precision. Within highly expressed coding regions, over 92% of expected variants were called with nearly 98% precision. Allele-specific expression and putative post-transcriptional modifications negatively impact variant genotyping accuracy from RNA sequencing and contribute to RNA-DNA differences. Variants called from RNA sequencing detect roughly 75% of eGenes identified using variants called from DNA sequencing, demonstrating a nearly 2-fold enrichment of eQTL variants. We observe a moderate-to-strong correlation in nominal association p-values (Spearman ρ2 ~ 0.6), although only 9% of eGenes have the same top associated variant.ConclusionsWe find hundreds of thousands of RNA-DNA differences in variants called from RNA and DNA sequencing on the same individuals. We identify several highly significant eQTL when using RNA sequencing variant genotypes which are not found with DNA sequencing variant genotypes, suggesting that using RNA sequencing variant genotypes for association testing results in an increased number of false positives. Our findings demonstrate that caution must be exercised beyond filtering for variant quality or imputation accuracy when analysing or imputing variants called from RNA sequencing.

A Systematic Review of Common and Brain-Disease-Specific RNA Editing Alterations Providing Novel Insights into Neurological and Neurodegenerative Disease Manifestations.

RNA editing contributes to transcriptome diversification through RNA modifications in relation to genome-encoded information (RNA–DNA differences, RDDs). The deamination of Adenosine (A) to Inosine (I) or Cytidine (C) to Uridine (U) is the most common type of mammalian RNA editing. It occurs as a nuclear co- and/or post-transcriptional event catalyzed by ADARs (Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA) and APOBECs (apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like genes). RNA editing may modify the structure, stability, and processing of a transcript. This review focuses on RNA editing in psychiatric, neurological, neurodegenerative (NDs), and autoimmune brain disorders in humans and rodent models. We discuss targeted studies that focus on RNA editing in specific neuron-enriched transcripts with well-established functions in neuronal activity, and transcriptome-wide studies, enabled by recent technological advances. We provide comparative editome analyses between human disease and corresponding animal models. Data suggest RNA editing to be an emerging mechanism in disease development, displaying common and disease-specific patterns. Commonly edited RNAs represent potential disease-associated targets for therapeutic and diagnostic values. Currently available data are primarily descriptive, calling for additional research to expand global editing profiles and to provide disease mechanistic insights. The potential use of RNA editing events as disease biomarkers and available tools for RNA editing identification, classification, ranking, and functional characterization that are being developed will enable comprehensive analyses for a better understanding of disease(s) pathogenesis and potential cures.

Human mitochondrial RNA modifications associate with tissue-specific changes in gene expression, and are affected by sunlight and UV exposure.

RNA-DNA differences (RDD) have previously been identified in the human mitochondrial RNA (mt-RNA) transcripts, yet their functional impact is poorly understood. By analyzing 4928 RNA-seq samples from 23 body sites, we found that mtDNA gene expression negatively correlated with the levels of both m1A 947 16 S rRNA modification (mtDNA position 2617) and the m1A 1812 ND5 mRNA modification (mtDNA position 13,710) in 15 and 14 body sites, respectively. Such correlation was not evident in all tested brain tissues, thus suggesting a tissue-specific impact of these modifications on mtDNA gene expression. To assess the response of the tested modifications to environmental cues, we analyzed pairs of skin samples that were either exposed to the sun or not. We found that the correlations of mtDNA gene expression with both mt-RNA modifications were compromised upon sun exposure. As a first step to explore the underlying mechanism, we analyzed RNA-seq data from keratinocytes that were exposed to increasing doses of UV irradiation. Similar to sun exposure, we found a significant decrease in mtDNA gene expression upon increase in UV dosage. In contrast, there was a significant increase in the m1A 947 16 S rRNA modification levels upon elevation in UV dose. Finally, we identified candidate modulators of such responses. Taken together, our results indicate that mt-RNA modifications functionally correlate with mtDNA gene expression, and responds to environmental cues, hence supporting their physiological importance.

Non-canonical RNA-DNA differences and other human genomic features are enriched within very short tandem repeats.

Very short tandem repeats bear substantial genetic, evolutional, and pathological significance in genome analyses. Here, we compiled a census of tandem mono-nucleotide/di-nucleotide/tri-nucleotide repeats (MNRs/DNRs/TNRs) in GRCh38, which we term "polytracts" in general. Of the human genome, 144.4 million nucleotides (4.7%) are occupied by polytracts, and 0.47 million single nucleotides are identified as polytract hinges, i.e., break-points of tandem polytracts. Preliminary exploration of the census suggested polytract hinge sites and boundaries of AAC polytracts may bear a higher mapping error rate than other polytract regions. Further, we revealed landscapes of polytract enrichment with respect to nearly a hundred genomic features. We found MNRs, DNRs, and TNRs displayed noticeable difference in terms of locational enrichment for miscellaneous genomic features, especially RNA editing events. Non-canonical and C-to-U RNA-editing events are enriched inside and/or adjacent to MNRs, while all categories of RNA-editing events are under-represented in DNRs. A-to-I RNA-editing events are generally under-represented in polytracts. The selective enrichment of non-canonical RNA-editing events within MNR adjacency provides a negative evidence against their authenticity. To enable similar locational enrichment analyses in relation to polytracts, we developed a software Polytrap which can handle 11 reference genomes. Additionally, we compiled polytracts of four model organisms into a Track Hub which can be integrated into USCS Genome Browser as an official track for convenient visualization of polytracts.

Genome-wide profiling of RNA editing sites in sheep

BackgroundThe widely observed RNA-DNA differences (RDDs) have been found to be due to nucleotide alteration by RNA editing. Canonical RNA editing (i.e., A-to-I and C-to-U editing) mediated by the adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) family and apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) family during the transcriptional process is considered common and essential for the development of an individual. To date, an increasing number of RNA editing sites have been reported in human, rodents, and some farm animals; however, genome-wide detection of RNA editing events in sheep has not been reported. The aim of this study was to identify RNA editing events in sheep by comparing the RNA-seq and DNA-seq data from three biological replicates of the kidney and spleen tissues.ResultsA total of 607 and 994 common edited sites within the three biological replicates were identified in the ovine kidney and spleen, respectively. Many of the RDDs were specific to an individual. The RNA editing-related genes identified in the present study might be evolved for specific biological functions in sheep, such as structural constituent of the cytoskeleton and microtubule-based processes. Furthermore, the edited sites found in the ovine BLCAP and NEIL1 genes are in line with those in previous reports on the porcine and human homologs, suggesting the existence of evolutionarily conserved RNA editing sites and they may play an important role in the structure and function of genes.ConclusionsOur study is the first to investigate RNA editing events in sheep. We screened out 607 and 994 RNA editing sites in three biological replicates of the ovine kidney and spleen and annotated 164 and 247 genes in the kidney and spleen, respectively. The gene function and conservation analysis of these RNA editing-related genes suggest that RNA editing is associated with important gene function in sheep. The putative functionally important RNA editing sites reported in the present study will help future studies on the relationship between these edited sites and the genetic traits in sheep.

JACUSA: site-specific identification of RNA editing events from replicate sequencing data

BackgroundRNA editing is a co-transcriptional modification that increases the molecular diversity, alters secondary structure and protein coding sequences by changing the sequence of transcripts. The most common RNA editing modification is the single base substitution (A→I) that is catalyzed by the members of the Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADAR) family. Typically, editing sites are identified as RNA-DNA-differences (RDDs) in a comparison of genome and transcriptome data from next-generation sequencing experiments. However, a method for robust detection of site-specific editing events from replicate RNA-seq data has not been published so far. Even more surprising, condition-specific editing events, which would show up as differences in RNA-RNA comparisons (RRDs) and depend on particular cellular states, are rarely discussed in the literature.ResultsWe present JACUSA, a versatile one-stop solution to detect single nucleotide variant positions from comparing RNA-DNA and/or RNA-RNA sequencing samples. The performance of JACUSA has been carefully evaluated and compared to other variant callers in an in silico benchmark. JACUSA outperforms other algorithms in terms of the F measure, which combines precision and recall, in all benchmark scenarios. This performance margin is highest for the RNA-RNA comparison scenario.We further validated JACUSA’s performance by testing its ability to detect A→I events using sequencing data from a human cell culture experiment and publicly available RNA-seq data from Drosophila melanogaster heads. To this end, we performed whole genome and RNA sequencing of HEK-293 cells on samples with lowered activity of candidate RNA editing enzymes. JACUSA has a higher recall and comparable precision for detecting true editing sites in RDD comparisons of HEK-293 data. Intriguingly, JACUSA captures most A→I events from RRD comparisons of RNA sequencing data derived from Drosophila and HEK-293 data sets.ConclusionOur software JACUSA detects single nucleotide variants by comparing data from next-generation sequencing experiments (RNA-DNA or RNA-RNA). In practice, JACUSA shows higher recall and comparable precision in detecting A→I sites from RNA-DNA comparisons, while showing higher precision and recall in RNA-RNA comparisons.

Mitochondrial 16S rRNA Is Methylated by tRNA Methyltransferase TRMT61B in All Vertebrates.

The mitochondrial ribosome, which translates all mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)-encoded proteins, should be tightly regulated pre- and post-transcriptionally. Recently, we found RNA-DNA differences (RDDs) at human mitochondrial 16S (large) rRNA position 947 that were indicative of post-transcriptional modification. Here, we show that these 16S rRNA RDDs result from a 1-methyladenosine (m1A) modification introduced by TRMT61B, thus being the first vertebrate methyltransferase that modifies both tRNA and rRNAs. m1A947 is conserved in humans and all vertebrates having adenine at the corresponding mtDNA position (90% of vertebrates). However, this mtDNA base is a thymine in 10% of the vertebrates and a guanine in the 23S rRNA of 95% of bacteria, suggesting alternative evolutionary solutions. m1A, uridine, or guanine may stabilize the local structure of mitochondrial and bacterial ribosomes. Experimental assessment of genome-edited Escherichia coli showed that unmodified adenine caused impaired protein synthesis and growth. Our findings revealed a conserved mechanism of rRNA modification that has been selected instead of DNA mutations to enable proper mitochondrial ribosome function.

Reverse Transcription Errors and RNA-DNA Differences at Short Tandem Repeats.

Transcript variation has important implications for organismal function in health and disease. Most transcriptome studies focus on assessing variation in gene expression levels and isoform representation. Variation at the level of transcript sequence is caused by RNA editing and transcription errors, and leads to nongenetically encoded transcript variants, or RNA–DNA differences (RDDs). Such variation has been understudied, in part because its detection is obscured by reverse transcription (RT) and sequencing errors. It has only been evaluated for intertranscript base substitution differences. Here, we investigated transcript sequence variation for short tandem repeats (STRs). We developed the first maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE) to infer RT error and RDD rates, taking next generation sequencing error rates into account. Using the MLE, we empirically evaluated RT error and RDD rates for STRs in a large-scale DNA and RNA replicated sequencing experiment conducted in a primate species. The RT error rates increased exponentially with STR length and were biased toward expansions. The RDD rates were approximately 1 order of magnitude lower than the RT error rates. The RT error rates estimated with the MLE from a primate data set were concordant with those estimated with an independent method, barcoded RNA sequencing, from a Caenorhabditis elegans data set. Our results have important implications for medical genomics, as STR allelic variation is associated with >40 diseases. STR nonallelic transcript variation can also contribute to disease phenotype. The MLE and empirical rates presented here can be used to evaluate the probability of disease-associated transcripts arising due to RDD.

The introduction of RNA-DNA differences underlies interindividual variation in the human IL12RB1 mRNA repertoire

Human interleukin 12 and interleukin 23 (IL12/23) influence susceptibility or resistance to multiple diseases. However, the reasons underlying individual differences in IL12/23 sensitivity remain poorly understood. Here we report that in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and inflamed lungs, the majority of interleukin-12 receptor β1 (IL12RB1) mRNAs contain a number of RNA-DNA differences (RDDs) that concentrate in sequences essential to IL12Rβ1's binding of IL12p40, the protein subunit common to both IL-12 and IL-23. IL12RB1 RDDs comprise multiple RDD types and are detectable by next-generation sequencing and classic Sanger sequencing. As a consequence of these RDDs, the resulting IL12Rβ1 proteins have an altered amino acid sequence that could not be predicted on the basis of genomic DNA sequencing alone. Importantly, the introduction of RDDs into IL12RB1 mRNAs negatively regulates IL12Rβ1's binding of IL12p40 and is sensitive to activation. Collectively, these results suggest that the introduction of RDDs into an individual's IL12RB1 mRNA repertoire is a novel determinant of IL12/23 sensitivity.

Genome-Wide Characterization of RNA Editing in Chicken Embryos Reveals Common Features among Vertebrates.

RNA editing results in a post-transcriptional nucleotide change in the RNA sequence that creates an alternative nucleotide not present in the DNA sequence. This leads to a diversification of transcription products with potential functional consequences. Two nucleotide substitutions are mainly described in animals, from adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) and from cytidine to uridine (C-to-U). This phenomenon is described in more details in mammals, notably since the availability of next generation sequencing technologies allowing whole genome screening of RNA-DNA differences. The number of studies recording RNA editing in other vertebrates like chicken is still limited. We chose to use high throughput sequencing technologies to search for RNA editing in chicken, and to extend the knowledge of its conservation among vertebrates. We performed sequencing of RNA and DNA from 8 embryos. Being aware of common pitfalls inherent to sequence analyses that lead to false positive discovery, we stringently filtered our datasets and found fewer than 40 reliable candidates. Conservation of particular sites of RNA editing was attested by the presence of 3 edited sites previously detected in mammals. We then characterized editing levels for selected candidates in several tissues and at different time points, from 4.5 days of embryonic development to adults, and observed a clear tissue-specificity and a gradual increase of editing level with time. By characterizing the RNA editing landscape in chicken, our results highlight the extent of evolutionary conservation of this phenomenon within vertebrates, attest to its tissue and stage specificity and provide support of the absence of non A-to-I events from the chicken transcriptome.

The introduction of RNA-DNA differences underlies inter-individual variation in the human IL12RB1 mRNA repertoire (CCR3P.204)

Abstract IL12 and IL23 promote numerous aspects of human immunity, including autoimmunity and mycobacterial disease resistance. IL12RB1 encodes human IL12Rβ1, a surface receptor that signals in complex with IL12Rβ2/IL23R to relay the pro-inflammatory signals of IL12/IL23. Here, we present data demonstrating that in primary human T-lymphocytes, sequence diversity reminiscent of TCRA/TCRB diversity is introduced into IL12RB1 mRNAs via RNA DNA differences (RDDs). RDDs are ribonucleotides present in an mRNA that are not genome encoded; as such they are distinct from genomic single nucleotide polymorphisms. First observed in protozoa, RDD-introduction is now known to be a mechanism employed by many species to suppress protein function. In the case of IL12RB1, we show that in T-cells of healthy individuals the majority of IL12RB1 mRNAs expressed contain RDDs that concentrate in exons encoding IL12Rβ1’s cytokine binding region. IL12RB1 RDDs comprise multiple mutation types, are detectable by both Ion Torrent sequencing and classic Sanger sequencing, and decrease in frequency following T-cell activation. As a result of RDD-introduction, IL12Rβ1 proteins have an altered amino acid sequence that could not be predicted based on genome sequencing alone. While the underlying mechanisms of sequence diversification differ for TCRA/TCRB and IL12RB1, the consequence of this diversification is the same - the expression of proteins of variable amino acid sequence and variable immunological function.

RNA-DNA Differences Are Generated in Human Cells within Seconds after RNA Exits Polymerase II

RNA sequences are expected to be identical to their corresponding DNA sequences. Here, we found all 12 types of RNA-DNA sequence differences (RDDs) in nascent RNA. Our results show that RDDs begin to occur in RNA chains ~55 nt from the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) active site. These RDDs occur so soon after transcription that they are incompatible with known deaminase-mediated RNA-editing mechanisms. Moreover, the 55 nt delay in appearance indicates that they do not arise during RNA synthesis by Pol II or as a direct consequence of modified base incorporation. Preliminary data suggest that RDD and R-loop formations may be coupled. These findings identify sequence substitution as an early step in cotranscriptional RNA processing.

RNA–DNA differences in human mitochondria restore ancestral form of 16S ribosomal RNA

RNA transcripts are generally identical to the underlying DNA sequences. Nevertheless, RNA–DNA differences (RDDs) were found in the nuclear human genome and in plants and animals but not in human mitochondria. Here, by deep sequencing of human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and RNA, we identified three RDD sites at mtDNA positions 295 (C-to-U), 13710 (A-to-U, A-to-G), and 2617 (A-to-U, A-to-G). Position 2617, within the 16S rRNA, harbored the most prevalent RDDs (>30% A-to-U and ∼15% A-to-G of the reads in all tested samples). The 2617 RDDs appeared already at the precursor polycistrone mitochondrial transcript. By using traditional Sanger sequencing, we identified the A-to-U RDD in six different cell lines and representative primates (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pigmaeus, and Macaca mulatta), suggesting conservation of the mechanism generating such RDD. Phylogenetic analysis of more than 1700 vertebrate mtDNA sequences supported a thymine as the primate ancestral allele at position 2617, suggesting that the 2617 RDD recapitulates the ancestral 16S rRNA. Modeling U or G (the RDDs) at position 2617 stabilized the large ribosomal subunit structure in contrast to destabilization by an A (the pre-RDDs). Hence, these mitochondrial RDDs are likely functional.

Analysis and design of RNA sequencing experiments for identifying RNA editing and other single-nucleotide variants

RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) technologies hold enormous promise for novel discoveries in genomics and transcriptomics. In the past year, a surge of reports has analyzed RNA-Seq data to gain a global view of the RNA editome. Opposing results have been presented, giving rise to extensive debate surrounding one of the first such studies in which a daunting list of all 12 types of RNA-DNA differences (RDDs) were identified. Although a consensus is forming that some of the initial "paradigm-shifting" results of this study may be questionable, recent reports on this topic differed in terms of the number and relative abundance of each type of RDD. Many outstanding issues exist, most importantly, the choice of bioinformatic approaches. Here we discuss the critical data analysis and experimental design issues of such studies to enable improved systematic investigation of the largely unexplored frontier of single-nucleotide variants in RNA.

Limited RNA Editing in Exons of Mouse Liver and Adipose

Several studies have investigated RNA-DNA differences (RDD), presumably due to RNA editing, with conflicting results. We report a rigorous analysis of RDD in exonic regions in mice, taking into account critical biases in RNA-Seq analysis. Using deep-sequenced F1 reciprocal inbred mice, we mapped 40 million RNA-Seq reads per liver sample and 180 million reads per adipose sample. We found 7300 apparent hepatic RDDs using a multiple-site mapping procedure, compared with 293 RDD found using a unique-site mapping procedure. After filtering for repeat sequence, splice junction proximity, undirectional strand, and extremity read bias, 63 RDD remained. In adipose tissue unique-site mapping identified 1667 RDD, and after applying the same four filters, 188 RDDs remained. In both tissues, the filtering procedure increased the proportion of canonical (A-to-I and C-to-U) editing events. The genomic DNA of 12 RDD sites among the potential 63 hepatic RDD was tested by Sanger sequencing, three of which proved to be due to unreferenced SNPs. We validated seven liver RDD with Sequenom technology, including two noncanonical, Gm5424 C-to-I(G) and Pisd I(G)-to-A RDD. Differences in diet, sex, or genetic background had very modest effects on RDD occurrence. Only a small number of apparent RDD sites overlapped between liver and adipose, indicating a high degree of tissue specificity. Our findings underscore the importance of properly filtering for bias in RNA-Seq investigations, including the necessity of confirming the DNA sequence to eliminate unreferenced SNPs. Based on our results, we conclude that RNA editing is likely limited to hundreds of events in exonic RNA in liver and adipose.

RNA-DNA differences are rarer in proto-oncogenes than in tumor suppressor genes

It has long been assumed that DNA sequences and corresponding RNA transcripts are almost identical; a recent discovery, however, revealed widespread RNA-DNA differences (RDDs), which represent a largely unexplored aspect of human genome variation. It has been speculated that RDDs can affect disease susceptibility and manifestations; however, almost nothing is known about how RDDs are related to disease. Here, we show that RDDs are rarer in proto-oncogenes than in tumor suppressor genes; the number of RDDs in coding exons, but not in 3′UTR and 5′UTR, is significantly lower in the former than the latter, and this trend is especially pronounced in non-synonymous RDDs, i.e., those cause amino acid changes. A potential mechanism is that, unlike proto-oncogenes, the requirement of tumor suppressor genes to have both alleles affected to cause tumor ‘buffers' these genes to tolerate more RDDs.

Systematic investigation of insertional and deletional RNA-DNA differences in the human transcriptome

BackgroundThe genomic information which is transcribed into the primary RNA can be altered by RNA editing at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional level, which provides an effective way to create transcript diversity in an organism. Altering can occur through substitutional RNA editing or via the insertion or deletion of nucleotides relative to the original template. Taking advantage of recent high throughput sequencing technology combined with bioinformatics tools, several groups have recently studied the genome-wide substitutional RNA editing profiles in human. However, while insertional/deletional (indel) RNA editing is well known in several lower species, only very scarce evidence supports the existence of insertional editing events in higher organisms such as human, and no previous work has specifically focused on indel differences between RNA and their matching DNA in human. Here, we provide the first study to examine the possibility of genome-wide indel RNA-DNA differences in one human individual, NA12878, whose RNA and matching genome have been deeply sequenced.ResultsWe apply different computational tools that are capable of identifying indel differences between RNA reads and the matching reference genome and we initially find hundreds of such indel candidates. However, with careful further analysis and filtering, we conclude that all candidates are false-positives created by splice junctions, paralog sequences, diploid alleles, and known genomic indel variations.ConclusionsOverall, our study suggests that indel RNA editing events are unlikely to exist broadly in the human transcriptome and emphasizes the necessity of a robust computational filter pipeline to obtain high confidence RNA-DNA difference results when analyzing high throughput sequencing data as suggested in the recent genome-wide RNA editing studies.

Widespread Promiscuous Genetic Information Transfer From DNA to RNA

### Widespread RNA and DNA Sequence Differences in the Human Transcriptome Li et al Science . 2011;333:53–58. New genomic studies show that the transfer of genetic information from DNA to RNA within humans is not very faithful. If true, frequent, or purposeful, then the implications for human health and disease are significant, but the burden of proof required is significant. Commentary: Molecular biology and genetics has a “central dogma.” First postulated by Francis Crick1,2 in 1958, shortly after the discovery of the double helix, it states that the molecular transfer or flow of genetic information occurs only as DNA→RNA→ protein. This argument is intrinsic to our understanding of genotypes, phenotypes, and human disease. The central “dogma,” a word whose precise meaning Crick acknowledged he did not precisely know3 and that could have been given the less glamorous moniker “hypothesis,” is frequently misunderstood as also implying high accuracy or even inflexibility.2 We now know that genetic information flow can be sometimes corrupted and can also occur in other directions in particular biological systems. A recent study by Li and colleagues,4 from the laboratory of Vivian Cheung at the University of Pennsylvania, now demonstrates apparent widespread DNA→RNA sequence differences in humans. The experiments they conducted involved sequencing reverse-transcribed RNA from cultured B cells isolated from 27 different humans and comparing them with their host genome sequences. Surprisingly, after appropriate quality controls, they discovered numerous base positions at which the RNA sequence was different from the DNA sequence in multiple molecules, a phenomenon they refer to as RDD (RNA-DNA difference). Specifically, they identified 28766 RDDs in the 27 individuals at 10210 exonic sites within 4741 genes. Each individual had high-quality RNA-based sequence data at 9.8 million sites: so, RDD was detected at a rate of 1.1×10−4 per exonic site (base) across human genes. Interestingly, they observed all 12 types …

Very few RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome.

RNA editing is an important cellular process by which the nucleotides in a mature RNA transcript are altered to cause them to differ from the corresponding DNA sequence. While this process yields essential transcripts in humans and other organisms, it is believed to occur at a relatively small number of loci. The rarity of RNA editing has been challenged by a recent comparison of human RNA and DNA sequence data from 27 individuals, which revealed that over 10,000 human exonic sites appear to exhibit RNA-DNA differences (RDDs). Many of these differences could not have been caused by either of the two previously known human RNA editing mechanisms—ADAR-mediated A→G substitutions or APOBEC1-mediated C→U switches—suggesting that a previously unknown mechanism of RNA editing may be active in humans. Here, we reanalyze these data and demonstrate that genomic sequences exist in these same individuals or in the human genome that match the majority of RDDs. Our results suggest that the majority of these RDD events were observed due to accurate transcription of sequences paralogous to the apparently edited gene but differing at the edited site. In light of our results it seems prudent to conclude that if indeed an unknown mechanism is causing RDD events in humans, such events occur at a much lower frequency than originally proposed.

RNA-DNA sequence differences spell genetic code ambiguities

A recent paper in Science by Li et al. 2011(1) reports widespread sequence differences in the human transcriptome between RNAs and their encoding genes termed RNA-DNA differences (RDDs). The findings could add a new layer of complexity to gene expression but the study has been criticized.