RNA Binding Proteins In Cancer Research Articles

FOXA1 regulates alternative splicing in prostate cancer.

SummaryDysregulation of alternative splicing in prostate cancer is linked to transcriptional programs activated by AR, ERG, FOXA1, and MYC. Here, we show that FOXA1 functions as the primary orchestrator of alternative splicing dysregulation across 500 primary and metastatic prostate cancer transcriptomes. We demonstrate that FOXA1 binds to the regulatory regions of splicing-related genes, including HNRNPK and SRSF1. By controlling trans-acting factor expression, FOXA1 exploits an “exon definition” mechanism calibrating alternative splicing toward dominant isoform production. This regulation especially impacts splicing factors themselves and leads to a reduction of nonsense-mediated decay (NMD)-targeted isoforms. Inclusion of the NMD-determinant FLNA exon 30 by FOXA1-controlled oncogene SRSF1 promotes cell growth in vitro and predicts disease recurrence. Overall, we report a role for FOXA1 in rewiring the alternative splicing landscape in prostate cancer through a cascade of events from chromatin access, to splicing factor regulation, and, finally, to alternative splicing of exons influencing patient survival.

Emerging Roles of NANOS RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer.

In recent years, growing evidence demonstrates that mammalian Nanos RNA-binding proteins (Nanos1, Nanos2, and Nanos3), known for their indispensable roles in germline development, are overexpressed in a variety of cancers. This overexpression contributes to various oncogenic properties including cancer growth, invasiveness, and metastasis. Here, we highlight recent findings regarding the role of mammalian Nanos RNA-binding proteins and the mechanisms of their overexpression in cancer. In addition, we present expression profiles of human NANOS genes and their oncogenic transcriptional regulators obtained from publicly available cancer and normal tissue RNA-Seq datasets. Altogether, we emphasize the functional significance of NANOS proteins across human cancers as well as highlight the missing links to understanding the full scope of their role in carcinogenesis.

Roles of Embryonic Lethal Abnormal Vision-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Cancer and Beyond.

Embryonic lethal abnormal vision-like (ELAVL) proteins are RNA binding proteins that were originally discovered as indispensable regulators of the development and functioning of the nervous system. Subsequent studies have shown that ELAVL proteins not only exist in the nervous system, but also have regulatory effects in other tissues. ELAVL proteins have attracted attention as potential therapeutic targets because they stabilize multiple mRNAs by binding within the 3′-untranslated region and thus promote the development of tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, colorectal carcinoma and lung cancer. Previous studies have focused on these important relationships with downstream mRNAs, but emerging studies suggest that ELAVL proteins also interact with non-coding RNAs. In this review, we will summarize the relationship of the ELAVL protein family with mRNA and non-coding RNA and the roles of ELAVL protein family members in a variety of physiological and pathological processes.

Multilayered control of splicing regulatory networks by DAP3 leads to widespread alternative splicing changes in cancer

The dynamic regulation of alternative splicing requires coordinated participation of multiple RNA binding proteins (RBPs). Aberrant splicing caused by dysregulation of splicing regulatory RBPs is implicated in numerous cancers. Here, we reveal a frequently overexpressed cancer-associated protein, DAP3, as a splicing regulatory RBP in cancer. Mechanistically, DAP3 coordinates splicing regulatory networks, not only via mediating the formation of ribonucleoprotein complexes to induce substrate-specific splicing changes, but also via modulating splicing of numerous splicing factors to cause indirect effect on splicing. A pan-cancer analysis of alternative splicing across 33 TCGA cancer types identified DAP3-modulated mis-splicing events in multiple cancers, and some of which predict poor prognosis. Functional investigation of non-productive splicing of WSB1 provides evidence for establishing a causal relationship between DAP3-modulated mis-splicing and tumorigenesis. Together, our work provides critical mechanistic insights into the splicing regulatory roles of DAP3 in cancer development.

Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 system for screening and editing RNA binding proteins in cancer.

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play an important role in RNA metabolism, regulating the stability, localization, and functional dynamics of RNAs. Alternation in the RBP-RNA network has profound implications in cellular physiology, and is related to the development and spread of cancer in certain cases. To regulate the expression of specific genes and their biological activities, various strategies have been applied to target RBPs for cancer treatments, including small-molecule inhibitors, small-interfering RNA, peptides, and aptamers. Recently, the deployment of the CRISPR-Cas9 technology has provided a new platform for RBP screening and regulation. This review summarizes the delivery systems of the CRISPR-Cas9 system and their role in RBP-based cancer therapeutics, including identification of novel RBPs and regulation of cancer-associated RBPs. The efficient delivery of the CRISPR-Cas9 system is important to the profound understanding and clinical transition of RBPs as cancer therapeutic targets.

Inhibition of YTHDF2 triggers proteotoxic cell death in MYC-driven breast cancer

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are critical regulators of post-transcriptional gene expression, and aberrant RBP-RNA interactions can promote cancer progression. Here, we interrogate the function of RBPs in cancer using pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screening and identify 57 RBP candidates with distinct roles in supporting MYC-driven oncogenic pathways. We find that disrupting YTHDF2-dependent mRNA degradation triggers apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells and tumors. eCLIP and m6A sequencing reveal that YTHDF2 interacts with mRNAs encoding proteins in the MAPK pathway that, when stabilized, induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and increase global translation rates. scRibo-STAMP profiling of translating mRNAs reveals unique alterations in the translatome of single cells within YTHDF2-depleted solid tumors, which selectively contribute to endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis in TNBC cells. Thus, our work highlights the therapeutic potential of RBPs by uncovering a critical role for YTHDF2 in counteracting the global increase of mRNA synthesis in MYC-driven breast cancers.

Alternative splicing perturbation landscape identifies RNA binding proteins as potential therapeutic targets in cancer

Alternative splicing (AS) plays an important role in gene regulation, and AS perturbations are frequently observed in cancer. RNA binding protein (RBP) is one of the molecular determinants of AS, and perturbations in RBP-gene network activity are causally associated with cancer development. Here, we performed a systematic analysis to characterize the perturbations in AS events across 18 cancer types. We showed that AS alterations were prevalent in cancer and involved in cancer-related pathways. Given that the extent of AS perturbation was associated with disease severity, we proposed a computational pipeline to identify RBP regulators. Pan-cancer analysis identified a number of conserved RBP regulators, which play important roles in regulating AS of genes involved in cancer hallmark pathways. Our application analysis revealed that the expression of 68 RBP regulators helped in cancer subtyping. Specifically, we identified four subtypes of kidney cancer with differences in cancer hallmark pathway activities and prognosis. Finally, we identified the small molecules that can potentially target the RBP genes and suggested potential candidates for cancer therapy. In summary, our comprehensive AS perturbation landscape analysis identified RBPs as potential therapeutic targets in cancer and provided novel insights into the regulatory functions of RBPs in cancer.

Role of PUM RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer.

Simple SummaryPUM1 and PUM2 are RNA-binding Pumilio proteins controlling the accessibility of hundreds of mRNAs for translation in a variety of human tissues. As a result, PUMs exemplify one of the mechanisms safeguarding the cellular proteome. PUM expression is disturbed in cancer, resulting in dysregulation of their target mRNAs. These targets encode factors responsible for processes usually affected in cancer, such as proliferation, apoptosis, and the cell cycle. This review describes PUM1 and PUM2 ribonucleoprotein networks and highlights the mechanisms underlying the regulatory role of PUM proteins and, most importantly, the emerging impact of PUM dysregulation in cancer. It also emphasizes the importance of upcoming studies on PUM proteins in the context of cancer, as they may provide new therapeutic targets in the future.Until recently, post-transcriptional gene regulation (PTGR), in contrast to transcriptional regulation, was not extensively explored in cancer, even though it seems to be highly important. PUM proteins are well described in the PTGR of several organisms and contain the PUF RNA-binding domain that recognizes the UGUANAUA motif, located mostly in the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of target mRNAs. Depending on the protein cofactors recruited by PUM proteins, target mRNAs are directed towards translation, repression, activation, degradation, or specific localization. Abnormal profiles of PUM expression have been shown in several types of cancer, in some of them being different for PUM1 and PUM2. This review summarizes the dysregulation of PUM1 and PUM2 expression in several cancer tissues. It also describes the regulatory mechanisms behind the activity of PUMs, including cooperation with microRNA and non-coding RNA machineries, as well as the alternative polyadenylation pathway. It also emphasizes the importance of future studies to gain a more complete picture of the role of PUM proteins in different types of cancer. Such studies may result in identification of novel targets for future cancer therapies.

Revealing Epigenetic Factors of circRNA Expression by Machine Learning in Various Cellular Contexts.

SummaryCircular RNAs (circRNAs) have been identified as naturally occurring RNAs that are highly represented in the eukaryotic transcriptome. Although a large number of circRNAs have been reported, the underlying regulatory mechanism of circRNAs biogenesis remains largely unknown. Here, we integrated in-depth multi-omics data including epigenome, transcriptome, and non-coding RNA and identified candidate circRNAs in six cellular contexts. Next, circRNAs were divided into two classes (high versus low) with different expression levels. Machine learning models were constructed that predicted circRNA expression levels based on 11 different histone modifications and host gene expression. We found that the models achieve great accuracy in predicting high versus low expressed circRNAs. Furthermore, the expression levels of host genes of circRNAs, H3k36me3, H3k79me2, and H4k20me1 contributed greatly to the classification models in six cellular contexts. In summary, all these results suggest that epigenetic modifications, particularly histone modifications, can effectively predict expression levels of circRNAs.

RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer: Functional and Therapeutic Perspectives.

Simple SummaryRNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play central roles in regulating posttranscriptional expression of genes. Many of them are known to be deregulated in a wide variety of cancers. Dysregulated RBPs influence the expression levels of target RNAs related to cancer phenotypes, such as proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, senescence, and EMT/invasion/metastasis. Thus, understanding the molecular functions of RBPs and their roles in cancer-related phenotypes can lead to improved therapeutic strategies.RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) crucially regulate gene expression through post-transcriptional regulation, such as by modulating microRNA (miRNA) processing and the alternative splicing, alternative polyadenylation, subcellular localization, stability, and translation of RNAs. More than 1500 RBPs have been identified to date, and many of them are known to be deregulated in cancer. Alterations in the expression and localization of RBPs can influence the expression levels of oncogenes, tumor-suppressor genes, and genome stability-related genes. RBP-mediated gene regulation can lead to diverse cancer-related cellular phenotypes, such as proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, senescence, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)/invasion/metastasis. This regulation can also be associated with cancer prognosis. Thus, RBPs can be potential targets for the development of therapeutics for the cancer treatment. In this review, we describe the molecular functions of RBPs, their roles in cancer-related cellular phenotypes, and various approaches that may be used to target RBPs for cancer treatment.

The Tristetraprolin Family of RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer: Progress and Future Prospects.

Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression plays a key role in cellular proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis. Increasing evidence suggests dysregulated post-transcriptional gene expression as an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of cancer. The tristetraprolin family of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), which include Zinc Finger Protein 36 (ZFP36; commonly referred to as tristetraprolin (TTP)), Zinc Finger Protein 36 like 1 (ZFP36L1), and Zinc Finger Protein 36 like 2 (ZFP36L2), play key roles in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Mechanistically, these proteins function by binding to the AU-rich elements within the 3′-untranslated regions of their target mRNAs and, in turn, increasing mRNA turnover. The TTP family RBPs are emerging as key regulators of multiple biological processes relevant to cancer and are aberrantly expressed in numerous human cancers. The TTP family RBPs have tumor-suppressive properties and are also associated with cancer prognosis, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy. Herein, we summarize the various hallmark molecular traits of cancers that are reported to be regulated by the TTP family RBPs. We emphasize the role of the TTP family RBPs in the regulation of trait-associated mRNA targets in relevant cancer types/cell lines. Finally, we highlight the potential of the TTP family RBPs as prognostic indicators and discuss the possibility of targeting these TTP family RBPs for therapeutic benefits.

Small-molecule targeting of MUSASHI RNA-binding activity in acute myeloid leukemia

The MUSASHI (MSI) family of RNA binding proteins (MSI1 and MSI2) contribute to a wide spectrum of cancers including acute myeloid leukemia. We find that the small molecule Ro 08–2750 (Ro) binds directly and selectively to MSI2 and competes for its RNA binding in biochemical assays. Ro treatment in mouse and human myeloid leukemia cells results in an increase in differentiation and apoptosis, inhibition of known MSI-targets, and a shared global gene expression signature similar to shRNA depletion of MSI2. Ro demonstrates in vivo inhibition of c-MYC and reduces disease burden in a murine AML leukemia model. Thus, we identify a small molecule that targets MSI’s oncogenic activity. Our study provides a framework for targeting RNA binding proteins in cancer.

Modulation of miRNA function by natural and synthetic RNA-binding proteins in cancer.

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) are the most important regulators of mRNA stability and translation in eukaryotic cells; however, the complex interplay between these systems is only now coming to light. RBPs and miRNAs regulate a unique set of targets in either a positive or negative manner and their regulation is mainly opposed to each other on overlapping targets. In some cases, the levels of RBPs or miRNAs regulate the cellular levels of one another and decreased levels of either results in changes in translation of their targets. There is growing evidence that these regulatory circuits are crucial in the development and progression of cancer; however, the rules underlying synergism and antagonism between miRNAs and RNA-binding proteins remain unclear. Synthetic biology seeks to develop artificial systems to better understand their natural counterparts and to develop new, useful technologies for manipulation of gene expression at the RNA level. The recent development of artificial RNA-binding proteins promises to enable a much greater understanding of the importance of the functional interactions between RNA-binding proteins and miRNAs, as well as enabling their manipulation for therapeutic purposes.

The RNA Binding Protein MSI2 Has Increased RNA Binding Activity in Leukemic Stem Cells Compared to Normal Hematopoietic Stem Cells

The RNA binding protein (RBP) MSI2 has been demonstrated to regulate the self-renewal activity and differentiation program of normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), as well as leukemic stem cells (LSCs) (Kharas et al, Nature Medicine 2010, Park et al, 2013 Journal of Experimental Medicine, Park et al JCI 2015). Yet, the extent of MSI2 targets and their differential activity in these rare cells are not known. Standard techniques for identifying RBP targets, such as RNA-IP and CLIP, require large cell numbers (>10 million) and are technically challenging. Here we employed HyperTRIBE, a recently discovered method (McMahon et al. 2016 and Xu et al., 2017), to globally map the MSI2 targeting network in HSPCs and LSCs. In HyperTRIBE, the catalytic domain of the Drosophila ADAR (adenosine deaminase enzyme) is fused with an RBP. This fusion protein leaves a “fingerprint” on the RBP RNA targets by marking the binding sites with an editing A-to-G event. HyperTRIBE was originally developed in Drosophila, but it is not known whether it can be used as a tool for mapping RBP targets in mammalian systems.To test this HyperTRIBE method, we first overexpressed MSI2-HyperTRIBE fusion, MSI2-ADAR dead catalytic mutant fusion control, or an empty vector control in the human AML cell line MOLM-13. Of the MSI2-HyperTRIBE identified targets, 75% overlapped with the iCLIP targets found in the NB4 cell line, suggesting that HyperTRIBE consistently identifies previously published direct MSI2 targets. We next employed MSI2-HyperTRIBE to determine MSI2 RNA targets in rare hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. We overexpressed MSI2-HyperTRIBE or controls in murine LSKs in vivo for seven weeks and sorted long term HSCs (LT), short term HSCs (ST), multipotent progenitors (MPP2 and MPP4) for RNA-seq. Using 360 to 20,000 sorted cells and as low as 0.1ng of RNA, we were able to identify MSI2 targets in all four HSPC populations (856 in LT-HSC, 783 in ST-HSC, 659 in MPP2, and 661 in MPP4) for the first time. Homer de novo motif search revealed the previously established MSI2 binding motif in all four HSPC populations. Overlapping the targets in LT-HSC, ST-HSC, and MPPs uncovered the unique MSI2 targeting network in LT-HSCs. Gene set enrichment analysis by ENRICHR demonstrated that these targets have a strong signature matching with the hematopoietic stem cell and myelodysplastic syndrome gene sets. These data can be used to unravel the changes in MSI2 targeting program in different stages of stem and progenitor differentiation for the first time.To decipher the differential regulation of MSI2 in normal HSPCs and LSCs, we performed HyperTRIBE in normal mouse LSKs and MLL-AF9 LSCs in vitro (RNA-sequencing was performed 48 hours after of transduction). Strikingly, there is a higher number of editing sites and target genes in LSCs compared to LSKs (2.5 times more editing sites and 1.4 times more genes) despite lower MSI2-HyperTRIBE expression in LSCs compared to LSKs and comparable endogenous MSI2 expression in both cell types. Overlapping the targets in these two cell types showed 82% of LSK targets were also found in LSCs. Furthermore, LSCs have three times more unique targets than LSKs. We observed, in most of the cases, an increase in the number of binding sites per MSI2 target in LSCs compared to LSKs, suggesting a higher affinity of MSI2 to its mRNA targets in LSCs. Of note, this phenomenon seems to be independent from the target mRNA abundance. Previously established targets such as Hoxa9 and Ikzf2 were found to be more efficiently edited and had more binding sites, indicating that MSI2 was more active in LSCs compared to LSKs. In summary, we demonstrated that MSI2 has higher activity at these genes in LSCs compared to LSKs. These data provide evidence for why leukemia cells are more dependent on MSI2 than HSPCs and suggest that expression of RBPs themselves can be distinct from their targeting activity. Moreover, our strategy provides a new platform for discovery of RBP targets in rare cells that can be generally applied to a wide range of dysregulated RBPs in cancer. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Cold-inducible RNA binding protein in cancer and inflammation.

RNA binding proteins (RBPs) play key roles in RNA dynamics, including subcellular localization, translational efficiency and metabolism. Cold-inducible RNA binding protein (CIRP) is a stress-induced protein that was initially described as a DNA damage-induced transcript (A18 hnRNP), as well as a cold-shock domain containing cold-stress response protein (CIRBP) that alters the translational efficiency of its target messenger RNAs (mRNAs). This review summarizes recent work on the roles of CIRP in the context of inflammation and cancer. The function of CIRP in cancer appeared to be solely driven though its functions as an RBP that targeted cancer-associated mRNAs, but it is increasingly clear that CIRP also modulates inflammation. Several recent studies highlight roles for CIRP in immune responses, ranging from sepsis to wound healing and tumor-promoting inflammation. While modulating inflammation is an established role for RBPs that target cytokine mRNAs, CIRP appears to modulate inflammation by several different mechanisms. CIRP has been found in serum, where it binds the TLR4-MD2 complex, acting as a Damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP). CIRP activates the NF-κB pathway, increasing phosphorylation of Iκκ and IκBα, and stabilizes mRNAs encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines. While CIRP promotes higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in certain cancers, it also decreases inflammation to accelerate wound healing. This dichotomy suggests that the influence of CIRP on inflammation is context dependent and highlights the importance of detailing the mechanisms by which CIRP modulates inflammation. WIREs RNA 2018, 9:e1462. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1462 This article is categorized under: RNA in Disease and Development > RNA in Disease RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications.

Comprehensive Genomic Characterization of RNA-Binding Proteins across Human Cancers

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) regulate the expression of thousands of transcripts, and some are reported to be involved in human tumorigenesis. However, little is known about the dysregulation of RBPs at the genomic level in human cancers. Here, we conducted comprehensive analyses forexpression, somatic copy number alteration (SCNA), and mutation profiles of 1,542 RBPs in ∼7,000 clinical specimens across 15 cancer types. We identified markedly dysregulated RBPs and found that downregulation was a predominant pattern in cancer. Combined with recurrent SCNA data, we identified 76 RBPs as potential drivers. We also discovered a set of 139 RBPs that were significantly mutated in cancers. We confirmed the oncogenic property of six RBPs in colorectal and liver cancer cell lines by using invitro functional experiments. Our study highlights the potential roles of RBPs in carcinogenesis and lays the groundwork to better understand the functions and mechanisms of RBPs in cancer.

Highlight: RNA-binding proteins in cancer

ADAR promotes lung adenocarcinoma migration and invasion through stabilization of FAK.

Resources for the Comprehensive Discovery of Functional RNA Elements

Transcriptome-wide maps of RNA binding protein (RBP)-RNA interactions by immunoprecipitation (IP)-based methods such as RNA IP (RIP) and crosslinking and IP (CLIP) are key starting points for evaluating the molecular roles of the thousands of human RBPs. A significant bottleneck to the application of these methods in diverse cell lines, tissues, and developmental stages is the availability of validated IP-quality antibodies. Using IP followed by immunoblot assays, we have developed a validated repository of 438 commercially available antibodies that interrogate 365 unique RBPs. In parallel, 362 short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) constructs against 276 unique RBPs were also used to confirm specificity of these antibodies. These antibodies can characterize subcellular RBP localization. With the burgeoning interest in the roles of RBPs in cancer, neurobiology, and development, these resources are invaluable to the broad scientific community. Detailed information about these resources is publicly available at the ENCODE portal (https://www.encodeproject.org/).

Versatility of RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer

Posttranscriptional gene regulation is a rapid and efficient process to adjust the proteome of a cell to a changing environment. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are the master regulators of mRNA processing and translation and are often aberrantly expressed in cancer. In addition to well-studied transcription factors, RBPs are emerging as fundamental players in tumor development. RBPs and their mRNA targets form a complex network that plays a crucial role in tumorigenesis. This paper describes mechanisms by which RBPs influence the expression of well-known oncogenes, focusing on precise examples that illustrate the versatility of RBPs in posttranscriptional control of cancer development. RBPs appeared very early in evolution, and new RNA-binding domains and combinations of them were generated in more complex organisms. The identification of RBPs, their mRNA targets, and their mechanism of action have provided novel potential targets for cancer therapy.

12 INVITED MicroRNAs and Regulatory RNA Binding Proteins in Cancer

12 INVITED MicroRNAs and Regulatory RNA Binding Proteins in Cancer