Rituximab Treatment In Patients Research Articles

Severe Neutropenia Following Rituximab Treatment in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Increasing evidence suggests that B cells play a critical role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Rituximab (RTX), a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, effectively decreases inflammatory disease processes in patients with MS by specifically removing B cells. Neutropenia is an uncommon side effect of CD20-depleting treatment and may require the administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors. We report the case of a patient with MS who experienced severe neutropenia during RTX treatment.

Severe Neutropenia Following Rituximab Treatment in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Increasing evidence suggests that B cells play a critical role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Rituximab (RTX), a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, effectively decreases inflammatory disease processes in patients with MS by specifically removing B cells. Neutropenia is an uncommon side effect of CD20-depleting treatment and may require the administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors. We report the case of a patient with MS who experienced severe neutropenia during RTX treatment.

Cancer risk with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, and rituximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Danish cohort study.

To investigate cancer risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab compared with those who received tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and compared with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) naïve RA patients. Nationwide registry-based cohort study of RA patients initiating treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, rituximab, TNFi, and bDMARD-naive patients their second type of conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). Patients were identified in DANBIO and followed for cancer from 2006-2020. Patients could contribute multiple treatments, with person years (PYRS), deaths, and cancers allocated to each treatment group in a 'latest type of treatment' manner. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and weighted cause-specific Cox models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer in each tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, and rituximab group compared with TNFI and bDMARD naïve groups, respectively. In total, 21 982 treatment initiations, 96 475 PYRS, and 1423 cancers were identified. There were no statistically significant increased HRs for overall cancer in tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab treatment groups (HRs ranged from 0.7-1.1). More than five years of abatacept exposure showed a non-significantly increased HR compared with TNFi (HR 1.41, 95% confidence intervals CI 0.74-2.71). For hematological cancers, rituximab treatment showed non-significantly reduced HRs: vs TNFi (HR 0.09; 95%CI 0.00-2.06) and bDMARD-naïve (HR 0.13; 95%CI 0.00-1.89). Treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab in RA patients was not associated with increased risks of cancer compared with TNFi-treated and with bDMARD-naïve RA patients in a real-world setting.

The Effect of Preemptive Rituximab Treatment in Patients with EBV Viremia after Solid Organ Transplantation on the Development of Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

The association between Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) reactivation after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) is well described. There are currently no guidelines regarding the use of rituximab preemptively in patients with EBV viremia after SOT to reduce the risk of PTLD. We sought to determine whether rituximab in SOT patients with EBV viremia has benefit in preventing PTLD. This retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data identified SOT recipients who experienced EBV viremia post-transplant between January 2010 and February 2023 at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC). Data queries were clinically reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between predictor variables including rituximab administration, log-transformed EBV peak titer, duration of EBV viremia, and time from SOT to EBV reactivation, with the binary primary outcome of PTLD diagnosis status. The analysis encompassed both univariate and multivariate logistic regression. There were 2,168 patients who met the inclusion criteria of having EBV reactivation after SOT, out of 6,395 total SOT performed at CUIMC during this timeframe. Patient characteristics are described in table 1. The median peak EBV titer was 154 (range: not quantifiable - 5,335,816), the median duration of EBV viremia was 78 days (range: 1 - 6,980), and the median time from SOT to EBV reactivation was 688 days (range: 0-11103). Of the 2,168 patients, 185/2168 (8.5%) received rituximab for indications other than PTLD including EBV viremia, treatment of rejection, antibody desensitization therapy/immunosuppression peri-transplant, and other non-transplant related indications (e.g. lupus nephritis). Of the patients who received rituximab, 182/185 (98.4%) did not develop PTLD. The 3/185 (1.6%) patients who did develop PTLD were all ≤ 20 years-old at time of diagnosis, and had EBER(+), monomorphic PTLD, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma type, with a non-germinal center phenotype, involving the gastrointestinal tract. Two were CD20 positive, all 3 had partial weak CD30 positivity, and all 3 had clonal immunoglobulin heavy chain rearrangements. Among the patients who did not receive preemptive rituximab post-SOT, 195/1983 (9.8%) developed PTLD, whereas 1788/1983 (90.2%) did not. Prior rituximab therapy for any indication in patients with EBV viremia post-SOT was associated with lower risk of subsequent PTLD by univariate analysis (0.14% vs 8.39%, OR 0.15, p = 0.0013, 95% CI 0.048-0.48). Receipt of rituximab (OR 0.12, p=0.0002), log-transformed peak EBV titer (OR 1.10, p<0.0001), and duration of EBV viremia in months (OR 1.01, p<0.0001) were all independently associated with risk for PTLD by multivariate analysis (figure 1). The relationship between time from SOT to EBV viremia was not significantly associated with development of PTLD. This retrospective analysis suggests that administering preemptive rituximab in SOT patients with EBV viremia may lower the risk of developing PTLD. The fact that peak EBV titer and duration of EBV viremia remain associated with PTLD in multivariate analyses suggests that the benefit of rituximab may be independent of the degree or duration of EBV viremia. A prospective analysis of factors such as area under the curve of EBV exposure, HLA status, T cell clonotype diversity, organ type, and immunosuppression type, is needed to better understand individual risks for improved selection of those who would benefit from preemptive rituximab.

Rituximab treatment in patients with graves' orbitopathy who are non-responsive to intravenous glucocorticoids is not better than IV glucocorticoids alone

Rituximab treatment in patients with graves' orbitopathy who are non-responsive to intravenous glucocorticoids is not better than IV glucocorticoids alone

89Zr]-immuno-PET prediction of response to rituximab treatment in patients with therapy refractory interstitial pneumonitis: a phase 2 trial

IntroductionImmune-mediated interstitial pneumonitis may be treated with anti-CD20 therapy after failure of conventional therapies. However, clinical response is variable. It was hypothesized that autoreactive CD20-positive cells may play an important role in this variability. This prospective study aims to elucidate if imaging of CD20-positive cells in the lungs allows prediction of the response to anti-CD20 treatment.MethodsTwenty-one patients with immune-mediated interstitial lung disease (ILD) with deteriorated pulmonary function received a dose of 1000 mg rituximab on day 1 and day 14 spiked with a tracer dose of radiolabeled [89Zr]-rituximab. PET/CT was performed on days 3 and 6. Standardized uptake values (SUV) were calculated as a measure for pulmonary CD20 expression. Based on pulmonary function tests (PFT), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), prior to and 6 months after treatment, patients were classified as responder (stable disease or improvement) or non-responder.ResultsFifteen patients (71%) were classified as responder. Pulmonary [89Zr]-rituximab PET SUVmean was significantly correlated with the change in FVC and DLCO (K = 0.49 and 0.56, respectively) when using target-to-background ratios, but not when using SUVmean alone. [89Zr]-rituximab SUVmean was significantly higher in responders than in non-responders (0.35 SD 0.09 vs. 0.23 SD 0.06; P = 0.02).ConclusionRituximab treatment was effective in the majority of patients. As a higher pulmonary uptake of [89Zr]-rituximab correlated with improvement of PFT and treatment outcome, [89Zr]-rituximab PET imaging may serve as a potential predictive biomarker for anti-CD20 therapy.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02251964

Long-term Outcomes After Rituximab Treatment for Patients With Systemic Sclerosis

Rituximab is emerging as a promising therapeutic option for systemic sclerosis (SSc), but its long-term outcomes and response markers are unknown. To evaluate the long-term outcomes after rituximab treatment for SSc and identify potential response markers. In this single-center cohort study, patients with SSc who continued to receive rituximab after the DESIRES trial were analyzed with a median follow-up of 96 weeks. Among the 43 patients who completed the DESIRES trial, 31 continued to receive rituximab, of which 29 with complete data were included in this study. Rituximab treatment. A post hoc analysis of the clinical and laboratory data. In 29 patients with SSc (27 female [93%]; median [IQR] age, 48 [35-45] years), significant improvement in modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS) and percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) were observed after 1 (median [IQR] change in MRSS, -7 [-8.5 to -4]; P < .001) and 3 (median [IQR] change in FVC% predicted, 1.85 [0.13-5.68]; P < .001) courses of rituximab, respectively, both of which were sustained during follow-up. High responders (MRSS improvement of ≥9; n = 16) experienced a greater decrease in serum levels of IgG (median [IQR] change in IgG, -125 [-207 to -83] vs 7 [-120 to 43]; P = .008) and IgA (median [IQR] change in IgA, -45 [-96 to -32] vs -11 [-20 to 3]; P < .001) compared with low responders (MRSS improvement of ≤8; n = 13). In particular, decrease in serum IgA levels significantly correlated with the improvement in MRSS (r = 0.64; P < .001). At the last follow-up, low IgM, low IgA, and low IgG was observed in 7, 1, and 1 patient, respectively, of which low IgM was associated with greater improvement in FVC% predicted (median [IQR] change in FVC% predicted, 7.2 [3.8-8.9] vs 3.6 [1.4-6.2]; P = .003). In this cohort study, rituximab treatment was associated with significantly improved skin and lung fibrosis in SSc in a long-term follow-up. Decrease in serum immunoglobulins was associated with greater clinical response.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases with various subtypes, myositis-specific antibodies, and affect multiple systems. The treatment of IIMs remains challenging, especially for refractory myositis. In addition to steroids and traditional immunosuppressants, rituximab (RTX), a B cell-depleting monoclonal antibody, is emerging as an alternative treatment for refractory myositis. However, the therapeutic response to RTX remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of RTX in patients with IIMs, excluding sporadic inclusion body myositis. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang Data were searched for relevant studies. The overall effective rate, complete response rate, and partial response rate were calculated to assess the efficacy of RTX. The incidences of adverse events, infection, severe adverse events, severe infection, and infusion reactions were collected to evaluate the safety of RTX. Subgroup analyses were performed using IIM subtypes, affected organs, continents, and countries. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to identify the sources of heterogeneity. A total of 26 studies were included in the quantitative analysis, which showed that 65% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 54%, 75%) of patients with IIMs responded to RTX, 45% (95% CI: 22%, 70%) of patients achieved a complete response, and 39% (95% CI: 26%, 53%) achieved a partial response. Subgroup analyses indicated that the overall efficacy rates in patients with refractory IIMs, dermatomyositis and polymyositis, as well as anti-synthetase syndrome were 62%, 68%, and 62%, respectively. The overall efficacy rates for muscle, lungs, and skin involvement were 59%, 65%, and 81%, respectively. In addition, studies conducted in Germany and the United States showed that patients with IIMs had an excellent response to RTX, with an effective rate of 90% and 77%, respectively. The incidence of severe adverse events and infections was 8% and 2%, respectively. RTX may be an effective and relatively safe treatment choice in patients with IIMs, especially for refractory cases. However, further verification via randomized controlled trials is warranted.

Long-term efficacy of low-dose rituximab treatment in patients with primary membranous nephropathy

Objective: To explore the long-term efficacy of low-dose rituximab (RTX) treatment in patients with primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven PMN who received low-dose RTX as initial or second-line regimen from August 2018 to May 2020 in the Department of Nephrology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital were respectively enrolled. The clinical parameters of patients were urinary protein>3.5 g/24 h, serum albumin<30 g/L and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)>20 ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1. The treatment response of patients with PMN was observed during follow-up, and the remission rate of patients with urinary protein<8 g/24 h or ≥8 g/24 h, anti-PLA2R antibody<150 RU/ml or ≥150 RU/ml, eGFR≥ 60 ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1 or<60 ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1 were analyzed, respectively. Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled, including 26 males and 14 females, aged (53±15) years. There were 14 patients received RTX as initial treatment and 26 patients as second-line therapy. The total median dose of RTX in the first course was 800 (425, 1 075) mg. The overall remission rate at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th and 24th months were 12.5% (5/40), 17.5% (7/40), 47.5% (19/40), 57.5% (23/40), 60% (24/40), respectively. The median overall response time was 6.0 (3.0, 7.5) months. Two cases relapsed. Patients with remission (n=24) had a higher level of baseline eGFR [(93.9±28.0) vs (62.4±28.1) ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1, P=0.001), and a lower level of both urinary protein [5.9 (5.0, 6.5) vs 11.7 (8.6, 15.5) g/24 h, P<0.001] and anti-PLA2R antibody level [73 (29, 132) vs 453 (182, 950) RU/ml, P=0.004] than those without remission (n=16) 24 month after treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in the remission rate between initial and second-line treatment (P=0.101). Moreover, patients had a higher remission rate in urinary protein<8 g/24 h group (21/26 vs 3/14, P<0.001), anti-PLA2R antibody<150 RU/ml group (16/19 vs 5/16, P=0.002) and eGFR ≥ 60 ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1 group (22/29 vs 2/11, P=0.003). Conclusions: Low-dose RTX treatment in PMN is effective during long-term follow-up, and has a lower recurrence rate. The results also suggest that it is more suitable for patients with baseline urinary protein<8 g/24 h, anti-PLA2R antibody<150 RU/ml and eGFR≥ 60 ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1.

Evaluation of efficacy of rituximab for membranous nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 studies

IntroductionThe use of traditional immunosuppressive medicines for the treatment of membranous nephropathy is being challenged, owing to its limited efficacy and tolerability. Research on M-type phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies has provided a new way for evaluating the efficiency and prognosis of treatment of membranous nephropathy. However, the relationship between rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against CD20, and antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibodies and the drug regimen of rituximab for membranous nephropathy is uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab treatments in membranous nephropathy and compared the clinical effects of first-line and second-line rituximab therapies. MethodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register ofControlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to find articles about rituximab treatment of patients with membranous nephropathy between January 2000 and August 2020. The outcomes included remission, antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibodies, relapse, and adverse events. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation criteria were used to evaluate the strength of evidence. ResultsA total of 723 participants from 11 trials were included in this meta-analysis. The other treatments included cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, steroids, and non-immunosuppressive antiproteinuric treatment. Rituximab significantly improved cumulative remission (P=0.007; Odds Ratio [OR]=3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.35–6.94) compared with other treatments. It significantly reduced relapse (P<0.00001; OR=0.06; 95% CI=0.02–0.19), antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody levels (P=0.0009; SMD=−0.52; 95% CI=−0.83 to −0.21), and the proportion of patients positive for anti-PLA2R antibodies (P=0.003; OR=6.11; 95% CI=1.85–20.24) compared with other treatments. Compared with the second-line, first-line rituximab therapy achieved a higher rate of cumulative remission (P=0.03; OR=0.32, 95% CI=0.11–0.91). ConclusionsRituximab can improve the rate of clinical remission in patients with membranous nephropathy. Rituximab was more effective than other treatments in reducing relapse, antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody levels, and the proportion of patients positive for antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibodies. The clinical remission rate following first-line rituximab therapy was better than that of second-line rituximab therapy for membranous nephropathy.

Effective Rituximab Treatment in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders Compared with Azathioprine and Mycophenolate.

IntroductionAs an autoimmune central nervous system disease characterized by inflammation and demyelination, neuromyelitis optica (NMO) has been extensively investigated. A specific antigenic target, astrocytic water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4) has already been identified, and it can be recognized explicitly by the autoantibody marker NMO-IgG. Along with the immune attacks, clinical disabilities would gradually accumulate. As there has been no validated and well-recognized therapy for NMO till now, preventing and postponing attack using immunosuppressive therapies is the primary treatment option.MethodsIn the current retrospective study, the effect of immunosuppressive agents was investigated through a long-term follow-up. To assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of rituximab (RTX), azathioprine (AZA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapies, all 129 patients with NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD) who received at least one of these treatments were studied, including 55 seropositive for AQP4-Ab and 74 seronegative for AQP4-Ab.ResultsThe median post-treatment annualized relapse rate (ARR) was lower than the pre-treatment rates in all AQP4+Ab groups (from 1.0 to 0.7 in RTX, from 0.8 to 0.3 in AZA, and from 0.85 to 0.35 in MMF). Meanwhile, the ARR also decreased in all AQP4−Ab groups (from 0.3 to 0.2 in RTX, from 0.9 to 0.5 in AZA, and from 0.9 to 0.4 in MMF). Disability condition improved in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in all AQP4+Ab groups (from 4.0 to 2.75 in RTX, from 3.5 to 2.5 in AZA, and from 3.0 to 2.0 in MMF) and in all AQP4−Ab groups (from 3.0 to 2.5 in RTX, from 3.0 to 2.5 in AZA, and from 3.5 to 2.0 in MMF). There was no statistically significant difference between the post-treatment and pre-treatment changes of EDSS and ARR in the RTX, AZA, and MMF groups (P > 0.05). However, according to Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, RTX-treated patients were more likely to be relapse-free after long-term follow-up than those who received AZA or MMF therapy. Meanwhile, adverse effects were noted in three out of 23 patients with RTX treatment, five of 32 with AZA treatment, and three of 21 with MMF treatment. No serious adverse events were observed in all treatment groups during the study.ConclusionsRTX, AZA, and MMF therapies efficiently lowered the relapse frequency and disability in both of the AQP4-Ab seropositive or seronegative patients with NMO. Furthermore, low dosage of RTX is recommended for the patients with NMO owing to its long-term effectiveness and safety.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-021-00298-5.

Rituximab Treatment and Long-term Outcome of Patients With Autoimmune Encephalitis: Real-world Evidence From the GENERATE Registry.

Background and ObjectivesTo determine the real-world use of rituximab in autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and to correlate rituximab treatment with the long-term outcome.MethodsPatients with NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-AE, leucine-rich glioma-inactivated-1 (LGI1)- AE, contactin-associated protein-like-2 (CASPR2)-AE, or glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) disease from the GErman Network for Research on AuToimmune Encephalitis who had received at least 1 rituximab dose and a control cohort of non–rituximab-treated patients were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsOf the 358 patients, 163 (46%) received rituximab (NMDAR-AE: 57%, CASPR2-AE: 44%, LGI1-AE: 43%, and GAD65 disease: 37%). Rituximab treatment was initiated significantly earlier in NMDAR- and LGI1-AE (median: 54 and 155 days from disease onset) compared with CASPR2-AE or GAD65 disease (median: 632 and 1,209 days). Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores improved significantly in patients with NMDAR-AE, both with and without rituximab treatment. Although being more severely affected at baseline, rituximab-treated patients with NMDAR-AE more frequently reached independent living (mRS score ≤2) (94% vs 88%). In LGI1-AE, rituximab-treated and nontreated patients improved, whereas in CASPR2-AE, only rituximab-treated patients improved significantly. No improvement was observed in patients with GAD65 disease. A significant reduction of the relapse rate was observed in rituximab-treated patients (5% vs 13%). Detection of NMDAR antibodies was significantly associated with mRS score improvement. A favorable outcome was also observed with early treatment initiation.DiscussionWe provide real-world data on immunosuppressive treatments with a focus on rituximab treatment for patients with AE in Germany. We suggest that early and short-term rituximab therapy might be an effective and safe treatment option in most patients with NMDAR-, LGI1-, and CASPR2-AE.Class of EvidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that rituximab is an effective treatment for some types of AE.

Anti-rituximab antibodies in pediatric steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces sustained remission in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. However, there is no consensus on the optimal regimen and monitoring of rituximab. In other autoimmune diseases, anti-rituximab antibodies (ARA) have been reported in 10-40% of patients, but their clinical relevance remains unclear. In nephrotic syndrome, data are scarce. We report a single-center retrospective study with immuno- and pharmacological monitoring of rituximab treatment in children with frequent relapsing (FR) or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). We analyzed the monthly monitoring of 24 children, receiving a dose of rituximab (375 mg/m2) between December 2017 and April 2018 at the Pediatric Nephrology Department of Robert-Debré hospital, Paris. ARA were detected in 7/24 patients (29%), sometimes after the first infusion of rituximab. ARA were present at baseline in two patients previously treated with rituximab. Both displayed no B-cell depletion. ARA were also reported in 5/22 patients during follow-up, with antibodies always detected in the first month following B-cell recovery. An incomplete CD19+CD20- B-cell depletion at M1 (5-25/mm3) and low serum rituximab levels was predictive of developing ARA. The development of de novo ARA during follow-up was not associated with shorter B-cell depletion. This study shows that ARA are frequent in children with FR/SDNS and that close immuno- and pharmacological monitoring may help personalizing rituximab treatment in patients needing repeated injections.

Comparison of the effectiveness of cyclophosphamide and rituximab treatment in patients with systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung diseases: a retrospective, observational cohort study.

To compare the effectiveness of cyclophosphamide and rituximab in the treatment of patients with systemic sclerosis with pulmonary involvement (SSc-ILD). Symptoms and the respiratory function parameters of 34 patients receiving cyclophosphamide and 27 patients receiving rituximab for at least 24months between 1996 and 2018 were compared. It was observed that symptoms including cough, Raynaud's phenomenon, digital ulceration, diarrhea, and dysphagia, but not dyspnea, recovered statistically significantly more in the rituximab group (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, p = 0.006, p = 0.005, and p < 0.001, respectively; for dyspnea p = 0.11). When differences in FVC and FVC% values were compared with baseline, it was found that there was a statistically significant increase in FVC (mL) (p = 0.02) and FVC% (p = 0.002) values after 12months of treatment in patients receiving cyclophosphamide compared with those receiving rituximab. When differences in DLCO and DLCO% values from baseline were compared, a statistically significant increase was seen in DLCO values after 15 and 24months (p = 0.003 and p = 0.048, respectively) of treatment, also in DLCO% values after 15 and 18months (p = 0.008 and p = 0.01, respectively) of treatment in patients receiving rituximab compared with those receiving cyclophosphamide. It was observed that both cyclophosphamide and rituximab treatments were effective in controlling dyspnea and worsened pulmonary function in SSc-ILD. The effect of cyclophosphamide is more prominent on FVC and rituximab is more effective on DLCO. Key Points • Both cyclophosphamide and rituximab treatments were effective in controlling dyspnea and worsened pulmonary function in SSc-ILD. •The effect of cyclophosphamide is more prominent on FVC and rituximab is more effective on DLCO.

All-case Japanese post-marketing surveillance of the real-world safety and efficacy of rituximab treatment in patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome

BackgroundRituximab is conditionally approved in Japan for use in patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome. To meet the conditions of approval, an all-case post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to confirm the real-world safety and efficacy of rituximab in patients of all ages with refractory nephrotic syndrome.MethodsAll patients scheduled to receive rituximab treatment for refractory nephrotic syndrome were eligible to register (registration: August 29, 2014 through April 15, 2016); the planned observation period was 2 years from the initiation of rituximab treatment (intravenous infusion, 375 mg/m2 once weekly for four doses). The study was conducted at 227 hospitals throughout Japan. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were collected for safety outcomes. The efficacy outcomes were relapse-free period and the degree of growth in pediatric (< 15 years) patients.ResultsIn total, 997 (447 pediatric) patients were registered; 981 (445) were included in the safety analysis set; 852 (402) completed the 2-year observation period; and 810 (429) were included in the efficacy analysis set. Refractory nephrotic syndrome had developed in childhood for 85.0% of patients, and 54.6% were aged ≥15 years. ADRs were observed in 527 (53.7%) patients, treatment-related infection/infestation in 235 (24.0%) patients, and infusion reactions in 313 (31.9%) patients. The relapse-free period was 580 days (95% confidence interval, 511–664). There was a significant change in height standard deviation score (pediatric patients; mean change, 0.093; standard deviation, 0.637; P = 0.009).ConclusionThe safety and efficacy of rituximab treatment in patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome were confirmed in the real-world setting.Clinical trial registrationUMIN000014997.

Long-Term Follow-up of Ibrutinib Treatment for Rituximab-Refractory Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis of the Open-Label Substudy of the Phase 3 iNNOVATETM Trial

Long-Term Follow-up of Ibrutinib Treatment for Rituximab-Refractory Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis of the Open-Label Substudy of the Phase 3 iNNOVATETM Trial

Treatment of fibrillary glomerulonephritis with rituximab: a 12-month pilot study.

Fibrillary glomerulonephritis (FGN) is a rare type of glomerulonephritis with poor prognosis, with no known effective therapies available for treatment. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in treatment of patients with FGN and to investigate the effect of rituximab on DNAJB9 levels. This was a pilot prospective clinical trial in which patients with idiopathic FGN were treated with two courses of rituximab (1 g each) 2 weeks apart at the beginning and then again at 6 months. Primary outcome was defined as preservation of kidney function at 12 months with stable or increased creatinine clearance. Secondary outcome was defined as achieving complete remission (CR) defined as proteinuria <300 mg/24 h or partial remission (PR) with proteinuria <3 g/24 h and at least 50% reduction in the proteinuria. DNAJB9 levels were also measured in the serum at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The creatinine clearance did not change significantly during this time, from 47.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline to 43.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 during follow-up (P = 0.15). Proteinuria declined from 4.43 (1.6-5.53) g/24 h at baseline to 1.9 (0.46-5.26) g/24 h at 12 months but did not reach significance (P = 0.06). None of the patients reached CR, and 3 of the 11 achieved PR. There was no change in the DNAJB9 levels following treatment with rituximab. The most common adverse event was nasal congestion, fatigue and muscle cramps. Treatment of patients with two courses of rituximab over a span of 6 months was associated with stabilization of renal function but did not result in a significant change in proteinuria and with no change in the DNAJB9 levels.

Low prevalence of late-onset neutropenia after rituximab treatment in patients with pemphigus

Low prevalence of late-onset neutropenia after rituximab treatment in patients with pemphigus

Improving individualized monitoring strategy for Rituximab treatment in patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: development of a high sensitive ddPCR assay for CD19 mRNA quantification (4123)

Improving individualized monitoring strategy for Rituximab treatment in patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: development of a high sensitive ddPCR assay for CD19 mRNA quantification (4123)

Risk of Malignancies in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Rituximab: Analyses of Global Postmarketing Safety Data and Long-Term Clinical Trial Data.

IntroductionPatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at an increased risk of developing malignancies, but it is unclear whether this increased risk is the result of disease pathobiology or immunosuppressant treatments for RA. This analysis evaluated the potential risk of malignancy in patients with RA treated with rituximab (MabThera®/Rituxan®) a CD20+ B-cell depleting agent manufactured by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.MethodsMalignancy rates were obtained from the rituximab global company safety database for adverse event reporting and from the rituximab global clinical trial program for RA consisting of eight randomized clinical trials, two long-term open-label extensions, and one open-label prospective study. Global company safety database searches were performed using the standard Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) queries “Malignant tumors wide” and “Skin malignant tumors wide” up to April 30, 2017. Age- and sex-specific comparator values from the general population were obtained from the US National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.ResultsFor the 409,706 patients with RA in the rituximab global company safety database since first market approval in 2006, 1739 cumulative malignant events were reported, with an overall malignancy reporting rate of approximately 4.2 events per 1000 patients. No evidence of increased risk of malignancy, of any organ-specific type, was found following rituximab treatment. The rate of malignancies from rituximab-treated patients in RA clinical trials was 7.4 per 1000 patient-years. This is within the expected range, with no evidence for increased risk over time or with additional rituximab courses.ConclusionsAnalyses of the global postmarketing safety database and long-term clinical trial data showed no evidence of an increased risk of malignancy of any type following rituximab treatment in patients with RA.FundingF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.