Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation Risk Research Articles

The Interconnection between Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Obesity: Anthropometric, Clinical and Biochemical Correlations.

Background and Objectives: Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and obesity are considered independent determinants of cardio- and cerebrovascular events. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of obesity on CIMT and to define which traditional cardiovascular risk factors correlate the most with CIMT values in patients with obesity. Materials and Methods: Anthropometric measurements were collected for the whole study group, as well as body composition and blood pressure data, and biochemical blood analyses were also performed. Results: Although our study group was significantly older according to vascular compared with chronological age, the mean CIMT values were lower when compared with the reference values. We found a statistically significant correlation of CIMT with chronological and vascular age, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference, body muscle mass and skeletal muscle mass index. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk assessment and SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) showed significant positive correlations, but there was only a weak correlation of ASCVD with CIMT. Conclusions: To deduce, since no diagnostic tool currently includes body weight as an individual risk factor, further trials are highly needed to determine if SCORE, SCORE2, ASCVD risk assessment or CIMT would be the most accurate and relevant diagnostic tool for prediction of risk for future CV events in patients with obesity.

Sex differences in cardiovascular and disease-related features in axial spondyloarthritis. A multicenter study of 912 patients

ObjectivesTo determine the potential impact of sex-specific disease-related characteristics on cardiovascular (CV) disease in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). MethodsCross-sectional study of the Spanish AtheSpAin cohort to study CV disease in axSpA. Data on carotid ultrasound and CV disease and disease-related features were collected. Results611 men and 301 women were recruited. Classic CV risk factors were significantly less prevalent in women, who also showed a lower frequency of carotid plaques (p = 0.001), lower carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) values ​​(p<0.001) and CV events (p = 0.008). However, after adjustment for classic CV risk factors, only the differences with respect to carotid IMT remained statistically significant. Women showed higher ESR at diagnosis (p = 0.038), and more active disease (ASDAS, p = 0.012, and BASDAI, p<0.001). They had shorter disease duration (p<0.001), lower prevalence of psoriasis (p = 0.008), less structural damage (mSASSS, p<0.001), and less mobility limitation (BASMI, p = 0.033). To establish whether these findings could lead to sex differences in CV disease burden, we compared the prevalence of carotid plaques in men and women with the same level of CV risk stratified according to the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE). Men included in the low-moderate CV risk SCORE category had more carotid plaques (p = 0.050), along with longer disease duration (p = 0.004), higher mSASSS (p = 0.001) and psoriasis (p = 0.023). In contrast, in the high-very high-risk SCORE category, carotid plaques were observed more frequently in women (p = 0.028), who were characterized as having worse BASFI (p = 0.011), BASDAI (p<0.001) and ASDAS (p = 0.027). ConclusionDisease-related features may influence the expression of atherosclerosis in patients with axSpA. This may be especially applicable to women at high CV risk, characterized by greater disease severity and more severe subclinical atherosclerosis than men, suggesting a stronger interaction between disease activity and atherosclerosis in women with axSpA.

Social jetlag, a novel predictor for high cardiovascular risk in blue-collar workers following permanent atypical work schedules.

SummaryCardiovascular diseases cause >4 million deaths each year in Europe alone. Preventive approaches that do not only consider individual risk factors but their interaction, such as the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), are recommended by European guidelines. Increased cardiovascular risk is associated with shift‐work, surely interacting with the concurrent conditions: disruption of sleep, unhealthy behaviours, and circadian misalignment. Social jetlag (SJL) has been proposed as a way to quantify circadian misalignment. We therefore investigated the association between SJL and cardiovascular health in a cross‐sectional observational study involving blue‐collar workers, who either worked permanent morning, evening, or night shifts. Sociodemographic, health and productivity data were collected through questionnaires. Blood pressure and cholesterol were measured and the cardiovascular risk was estimated according to the relative risk SCORE chart. Bivariate analysis was performed according to the cardiovascular risk and the relationship between SJL and high cardiovascular risk was analysed through logistic regression. Cumulative models were performed, adjusted for various confounding factors. After 49 exclusions, the final sample comprised 301 workers (56% males; aged <40 years, 73%). Mean standard deviation (SD) SJL was 1:57 (1:38) hr (59.4% ≤2 hr). Cardiovascular risk was high in 20% of the sample. Multivariate analysis revealed SJL to be an independent risk factor for high cardiovascular risk. Each additional hour of SJL increased this risk by >30% (odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.68). This is the first study indicating that SJL potentially increases cardiovascular risk, and suggests that sleep and individual circadian qualities are critical in preventing negative health impacts of shift‐work.

Correlation between Risk Score Systems and the extent of Coronary Artery Disease detected by Multislice Computed Tomography

Abstract Background Risk stratifying patients for cardiovascular diseases is crucial to formulate early effective prevention strategies. Risk scoring systems (RSS) as Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) have been designed for early predictions of cardiovascular events in 10-year time. Objectives To study the correlation between Risk Score Systems and the extent of Coronary Artery Disease detected by Coronary CT angiography. Methods This analysis concluded 120 patients without known coronary disease referred to CCTA from January to June 2018. The extent of CAD, calcium score, coronary plaque burden, composition and distribution were assessed. The Framingham and SCORE risk scores were calculated, then correlation between them was done. Results This included 120 patients (mean age 54 + 9 years, 55% male patients). MSCT detected the presence of coronary lesions in 53.3% of the cases, 18.3% of them were with obstructive plaques (stenosis ≥ 50% in the LM or ≥ 70% in any other vessel). Both RSS had a good diagnostic value where SCORE was found to have a higher predictive value (area under ROC curves, 0.754 vs 0.711 for SCORE and FRS respectively). Low SCORE risk category showed the least number of patients with significant CAD (1/22 = 4.5%), compared to those with low risk using FRS (7/85 = 8.2%). High risk SCORE category included more patients with significant CAD (9/23 = 39%), compared to patients with FRS high risk category (3/10 = 30%). A high versus low risk SCORE was related to a higher plaque burden severity (mean burden 57.20=9.75 vs 50.17 + 9.75, respectively, P-value=0.008) and to a great incidence of Calcium Score (CS) &amp;gt; 100 (mean calcium 101.39 + 113.30 vs 3.18 + 13.40, respectively, P-value=0.000). A high versus low risk FRS was related to a higher plaque burden severity (mean burden 60.90 + 15.6 vs 54.06 + 8.04, respectively, P-value=0.039) and to a great incidence of Calcium Score (CS) &amp;gt; 100 (mean calcium 122.40 + 143.89 vs 26.84 + 81.75, respectively, P-value=0.001). Conclusion Risk score correlates well with the extent of CAD detected by MSCT where SCORE had a higher predictive value than FRS.

Predictive validity of the risk SCORE model in a Mediterranean population with dyslipidemia

Background and aimsCholesterol treatment for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is based on cardiovascular risk, as assessed by the SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) scale. This study aimed to assess the predictive value and clinical utility of the SCORE scale for preventing cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in people with dyslipidemia and no lipid-lowering treatment. MethodsPatients with dyslipidemia and no lipid-lowering treatment were included from the ESCARVAL-RISK cohort. Cardiovascular risk was calculated by means of the SCORE scale. All deaths and cardiovascular events were recorded for up to five years of follow-up. We calculated sensitivity, specificity and other predictive values for different cut-off points and assessed the effect of different risk factors on the diagnostic accuracy of the SCORE charts. ResultsIn the final cohort of 18,853 patients, there were 1565 cardiovascular events and 268 deaths. The risk value recommended to initiate pharmacological treatment (5%) presented a specificity of 86% for death and 90% for cardiovascular events, and a sensitivity of 53% for death and 32% for cardiovascular events. In addition, the scale classified as low risk 62.8% of the patients who suffered a cardiovascular event and 46.6% of those who died. Antithrombotic treatment, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, peripheral artery disease and chronic kidney disease were associated with a reduction in the predictive capability of the SCORE scale, whereas metabolic syndrome was related to better risk prediction. ConclusionsThe predictive capability of the SCORE scale for cardiovascular disease and total mortality in patients with dyslipidemia is limited.

Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk assessment tools’ estimations of 10-year cardiovascular risk: a population-based study

Background: This cross-sectional study determines the association between 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, estimated using four CVD risk assessment tools, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in northern Iranian general population. Methods: We used the data of 2371 participants aged 40–74 without any history of diabetes mellitus from a cohort study conducted among 6140 subjects aged 10–90 years in northern Iran. Three definitions of MetS were used. The four CVD risk assessment tools used to estimate the 10-year CVD risk included pooled cohort equations of ACC/AHA, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) equations (for low-risk and high-risk European countries), and Framingham general cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between various definitions of MetS and 10-year CVD risk of ≥5%, ≥ 7.5%, and ≥10%, based on the related risk assessment tools. Results: In men, univariate logistic regression analysis showed the strongest association between 10-year risk of ≥0.1 estimated by Framingham risk profile and the three definitions of MetS. In women, the 10-year risks by Framingham risk profile and SCORE equations for high-risk European countries had stronger associations with various definitions of MetS than others. No significant associations were detected between estimated risks of four risk assessment tools and various definitions of MetS in multivariate logistic regression analyses. Conclusion: No independent associations were observed between estimations of 10-year CVD risk using four risk assessment tools and various definitions of MetS.

Cardiovascular risk profiles in a hospital-based population of patients with psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: a cross-sectional study.

The objective of the study was to investigate the frequency of traditional risk factors for the cardiovascular (CV) disease, to calculate the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) for CV-related mortality in Danish patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and to compare with results from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the same settlement. All PsA and AS patients aged 18-85years from one outpatient clinic were invited. A rheumatology nurse conducted 30-min screening consultation, preceded by a lipid and glucose profile. High SCORE risk led to recommendation of follow-up by general practitioners. Multiple and logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age and gender, were performed, to compare risk factors and risk SCOREs. Participants were 116 AS (29.3% female) and 170 PsA (54.7% female). AS had opposed PsA patients' lower 10-year risk SCOREs of CV mortality than RA patients: AS versus RA coefficient -0.47 (confidence interval (CI) 95%: -0.84 to -0.) and PsA versus RA -0.14, (-0.43-0.16). Women with PsA and AS had increased waistline compared to women with RA [PsA vs. RA 7.94 (4.51-11.38); AS versus RA 6.67 (1.17-12.17)], and an increased prevalence of hypertension was seen in AS versus RA patients [1.87 (1.15-3.05)]. Traditional, modifiable CV risk factors were present in PsA and AS patients. AS but not PsA patients had an estimated lower 10-year risk of CV mortality than RA patients, according to the SCORE model adjusted for age and gender.

THU0045 Score and framingham predict cv disease incidence in RA patients better than intima-media thickness

BackgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease with an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) predicts CV events in the general population, and hence, is used as...

Heart Rate – An Emerging Cardiovascular Risk Factor

The development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is usually caused by multiple risk factors, which interact to produce an individuals total CVD risk. Therefore the guidelines on the prevention of CVD recommend the preventive measures be based on individual’s levels of total CVD risk so that the most intensive risk factor management can be directed towards those at highest risk. Elevated resting heart rate is a known independent cardiovascular risk factor but is not included in any risk estimating system-Coronary risk chart or SCORE(Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation).which are used for estimation of individuals 10 year risk of a CVD event based on gender, age, total cholesterol, smoking status and systolic blood pressure. The findings several epidemiological studies showed an association between elevated heart rate an increased risk of allcause mortality and morbidity in general population, hypertensives, diabetics and those with CAD. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/uhj.v8i1.11665 University Heart Journal Vol. 8, No. 1, January 2012

Exercise workload, cardiovascular risk factor evaluation and the risk of stroke in middle‐aged men

We investigated the prognostic significance of risk scores and exercise workload with respect to stroke. Background. There are no data on exercise workload combined with European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) in the prediction of stroke. Exercise workload was measured by exercise test with an electrically braked cycle ergometer performed at baseline. The study is based on a random population-based sample of 1639 men (42-60 years) without history of type 2 diabetes or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease including coronary heart disease, stroke or claudication. During an average follow-up of 16 years, a total of 97 strokes occurred, of which 71 were ischaemic strokes. Independent predictors for all strokes were European SCORE [for 1% increment, relative risk (RR): 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.22, P=0.017), maximal workload (for 20 W increment, RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.95, P=0.003) and body mass index (for 5 kg m(-2) increment, RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.14, P=0.004), when adjusted for serum HDL, alcohol consumption, C-reactive protein, family history of coronary heart disease, exercise-induced ST changes and the use of medications for hypertension, dyslipidaemia or aspirin. The risk was 2.54-fold (95% CI: 1.27-5.09, P=0.008) for any strokes and 4.43-fold (95% CI 1.69-11.78, P=0.003) for ischaemic strokes amongst men with exercise capacity less than 162 W when compared with those with high exercise capacity over 230 W, after adjustment for risk factors. Low exercise workload predicts an especially high risk for stroke in the presence of high risk SCORE.

Exercise workload, coronary risk evaluation and the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death in middle-aged men

No data exist on exercise workload combined with European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) with respect to death from cardiovascular diseases and other causes. We therefore investigated the prognostic significance of risk scores and exercise capacity with respect to cardiovascular diseases. A population-based follow-up study. Exercise workload was measured by exercise test with an electrically braked cycle ergometer. The study is based on a random population-based sample of 1639 men (42-60 years) without history of type II diabetes or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease including coronary heart disease, stroke or claudication. During an average follow-up of 16 years, a total of 304 overall deaths and 116 cardiovascular deaths occurred. Relative risk (RR) was 2.50 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.71-3.68, P<0.001] for all-cause death and 2.04 (95% CI: 1.14-3.65, P=0.016) for cardiovascular death among men with exercise capacity less than 162 W as compared with those with exercise capacity over 230 W, after adjustment for risk factors. Independent predictors for all-cause death were European SCORE (for 1% increment, RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.10-1.20, P<0.001), exercise workload (for 20 W increment, RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82-0.91, P<0.001), C-reactive protein and alcohol consumption, when adjusted for serum high-density lipoprotein, body mass index, family history of coronary heart disease, exercise-induced ST changes and the use of medications for hypertension, dyslipidemia or aspirin. Low exercise workload predicts an especially high risk for death from cardiovascular and any other cause when combined with high risk SCORE.