Risk-reducing Surgery Research Articles

Pattern Anlysis of Risk-Reducing Strategies in Unaffected Korean BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

The lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer increases substantially for individuals with mutations in BRCA1/2. The evidence indicates that BRCA1/2 mutation carriers benefit from early cancer detection and prevention strategies. However, data on the patterns of risk-reducing interventions are lacking. This study investigated the patterns of surveillance and risk-reducing interventions among unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. A cohort of unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was identified from the Korean Hereditary Breast cAncer (KOHBRA) study database, and a telephone survey was conducted. The survey included questions on the incidence of new cancers, patterns of cancer (breast, ovarian, prostate, other) surveillance, chemoprevention, risk-reducing surgery, and reasons for participating in risk-reducing strategies. Between November 2016 and November 2020, 192 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were contacted, of which 83 responded. After excluding 37 responders who refused to participate, 46 participants (15 males, 31 females) were included in the analysis. The mean ± SD follow-up time was 103 ± 17 months (median 107, range 68~154), and the mean ± SD age was 31 ± 8 years. Ten BRCA1/2 mutation carriers developed breast cancer, one developed ovarian cancer, and three developed other cancers. Six BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (19.4%) underwent annual breast cancer surveillance as recommended by guidelines, while none underwent ovarian or prostate cancer surveillance. Three carriers (9.7%) used chemoprevention for breast cancer. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was performed on only one BRCA1/2 mutation carrier. The rates of breast/ovarian cancer surveillance, chemoprevention, and risk-reducing surgery were low among unaffected Korean BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Given this cohort’s relatively high risk of developing breast cancer, strategies to encourage active participation in risk reduction are needed.

Factors influencing gynecologic risk reduction surgeries for BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation carriers

Factors influencing gynecologic risk reduction surgeries for BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation carriers

BRCA Mutation in Ovarian Cancer: Implications for Screening, Diagnosis, and Preventive Measures

Ovarian cancer is the most common gynaecological malignancy and the seventh most common malignancy in women. Inherited ovarian cancer is caused by mutations in certain genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, as well as many minor genes. The pathology of ovarian cancer involves damage to the cell cycle mechanism secondary to mutations in BRCA1/2 protective genes. These mutations provide a meaningful marker for screening and diagnosing hereditary ovarian cancer. Classification of ovarian cancer is based on histology, depending on which layers of the ovary are affected. The authors conducted an electronic search using keywords and selected the included studies based on pre-established inclusion criteria. To avoid bias in the data extraction process, three reviewers extracted information independently. Risk assessment models provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) are mostly used in clinical practice. The combination of serial serum cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) levels and transvaginal ultrasound is the only evidence-based screening approach available to patients at increased risk for ovarian cancer. Strong evidence has made salpingo-oophorectomy the gold standard for risk-reducing surgery. Bilateral salpingectomy, in contrast, is restricted to clinical trials currently. The protective effects of oral contraceptives have made them suitable agents for chemoprevention. Whilst the potential benefits of aspirin and certain other drugs have been investigated, further research is required to address the gap in data for them to be used in clinical practice for the purpose of ovarian cancer prevention.

Impact of graphical display on the intention to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and mastectomy in individuals positive for BRCA pathogenic variant

The BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV) increases the risk of breast and ovarian cancer; thus, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and mastectomy (RRM) are recommended. We evaluated the effects of the graphical display of cancer risk compared with those of numerical presentation on the decision-making for risk-reducing (RR) surgery. A total of 471 women representing the Korean population were recruited. The lifetime risk of breast/ovarian cancer were given numerically followed by graphically in hypothetical BRCA1/2 PV-positive cases. Subsequently, the study participants were asked for their willingness to undergo RRSO/RRM. When the ovarian cancer risk was shown as 44.0%, the percentage of study participants who chose RRSO was 41.0% after numerical presentation versus 39.9% after graphical display, of which the difference was not significant. When the breast cancer risk was presented as 72.0%, 30.4% of the participants opted for RRM under numerical presentation, whereas this increased to 38.6% under graphical display, of which the difference was significant (p < 0.0075). The average levels of the cancer risk which study participants consider RR surgery were 57.1% for ovarian cancer and 60.6% for breast cancer. This suggests that the impacts of different formats of risk communication on decision about RRSO or RRM may be different by the absolute levels of ovarian or breast cancer.

Uptake of Risk-Reducing Surgeries in an International Real-World Cohort of Hispanic Women.

Women with pathogenic variants (PVs) in breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) associated genes are candidates for cancer risk-reducing strategies. Limited information is available regarding risk-reducing surgeries (RRS) among Hispanics. The aim of this study was to describe the uptake of RRS in an international real-world experience of Hispanic women referred for genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) and to identify factors affecting uptake. Between July 1997 and December 2019, Hispanic women, living in the United States or in Latin America, enrolled in the Clinical Cancer Genomics Community Research Network registry were prospectively included. Demographic characteristics and data regarding RRS were obtained from chart reviews and patient-reported follow-up questionnaires. Median follow-up was 41 months. Among 1,736 Hispanic women referred for GCRA, 27.2% women underwent risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM), 25.5% risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and, 10.7% both surgeries. Among BRCA carriers, rates of RRM and RRSO were 47.6% and 56.7%, respectively. In the multivariate analyses, being a carrier of a BC susceptibility gene (odds ratio [OR], 3.44), personal history of BC (OR, 6.22), living in the US (OR, 3.90), age ≤50 years (OR, 1.68) and, family history of BC (OR, 1.56) were associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing RRM. Carrying an OC susceptibility gene (OR, 6.72) was associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing RRSO. The rate of RRS among Hispanic women is suboptimal. PV carriers, women with personal history of cancer, and those with a family history of cancer were more likely to have RRS, with less uptake outside the US. Understanding personal and systemic factors influencing uptake may enable interventions to increase risk appropriate uptake of RRS.

Risk-reducing surgeries for breast cancer in Brazilian patients undergoing multigene germline panel: impact of results on decision making.

To assess the behavior change of high-risk breast cancer patients regarding the intention to undergo risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM) before and after genetic testing results and to identify the main influencing factors in decision-making. Prospective cohort study conducted between November 2021 and October 2022 with women under follow-up at the high-risk outpatient clinic of the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP). Patients were referred for genetic testing, followed by counseling according to the test result. A total of 373 women were included. In the pre-genetic testing analysis, 54.1% of patients intended to undergo RRMs. After testing, 42.2% opted for the procedure. Behavior change occurred in 26.2%, mainly from "yes" to "no/don't know" (72,6%) (p < 0.001). The genetic test result was positive (LPV or PV) in 29.7% of patients. Among the 90 patients with positive results, 62 (68.9%) agreed to RRM, while 22 (24.4%) remained unwilling to accept RRM, regardless of the positive test. Significant influencing factors for behavior change pre- and post-genetic testing (in favor of surgery) in multivariate analysis were: positive genetic test result (OR 2.94, p < 0.001), personal cancer history (OR 2.7, p = 0.008), and ages between 40 and 49years (OR 2.07, p = 0.008) and ≥ 50years (OR 3.47, p < 0.001). In a Brazilian population at high-risk for breast cancer and users of the public health system, it was observed that most desired RRM, however, when genetic testing and counseling were performed, behavior change was observed, especially when the result was positive.

Management of BRCA-associated breast cancer patients in low and middle-income countries: a review.

Breast cancer poses a significant global health challenge, with higher incidence rates in developed countries. However, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) suffer from higher mortality rates due to various factors, including limited screening programs, delayed diagnosis and inadequate access to healthcare and advanced treatments. Approximately 5%-10% of breast cancer cases stem from germline mutations in BRCA-1/2 genes. A positive BRCA1/2 status obtained through genetic testing significantly influences surgical and medical treatment decisions. Therefore, genetic counseling, proper surveillance and customized interventions for BRCA1/2 carriers are essential to maximizing the benefits of monitoring, chemoprevention and risk-reducing surgeries for breast and ovarian cancers. Identification of BRCA mutations also impacts treatment strategies, leading to the integration of chemotherapeutic agents like platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors. However, implementing these advanced treatment guidelines in LMICs with complex, fragmented and underfunded healthcare systems presents numerous challenges. In this review, we explore the current status and obstacles associated with managing BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer in LMICs.

Evaluation of an Italian Population-Based Programme for Risk Assessment and Genetic Counselling and Testing for BRCA1/2-Related Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer after 10 Years of Operation: An Observational Study Protocol.

Hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is caused by the inheritance of monoallelic germline BRCA1/2 gene mutations. If BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are identified before the disease develops, effective actions against HBOC can be taken, including intensive screening, risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy, and risk-reducing medications. The Italian National Prevention Plan mandates the creation of regional BRCA genetic testing programmes. So far, however, only informal data have been reported on their implementation. We have designed a study aimed at evaluating the results of a population-based programme for risk assessment and genetic counselling and testing for BRCA1/2-related HBOC that is underway in the Emilia-Romagna region (northern Italy). The programme-which is entirely free-includes basic screening with an estimate of the likelihood of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation using a familial risk assessment tool, a closer examination of women with suspected risk increase, an assessment of the need for further genetic counselling and, if needed, genetic testing and risk-reducing interventions. In this paper, the design of the programme and the protocol of the study are presented. The study has an observational, historical cohort design. Eligible are the women found to be at an increased risk of HBOC (profile 3 women). The main objectives are (i) to determine the precision of the programme in measuring the level of risk of HBOC for profile 3 women; (ii) to determine the characteristics of profile 3 women and their association with the risk management strategy chosen; (iii) to compare the age at onset, histologic type, tumour stage, molecular subtype, and prognosis of breast/ovarian cancers observed in the cohort of profile 3 women with the features of sporadic cancers observed in the general female population; (iv) to determine the level and the determinants of adherence to recommendations; and (v) to determine the appropriateness and timing of risk-reducing surgery and medications. Investigating the quality and results of the programme is necessary because the best practices in risk assessment and genetic counselling and testing for BRCA1/2-related cancer and the challenges they encounter should be identified and shared. The study has the potential to provide sound empirical evidence for the factors affecting the effectiveness of this type of service.

Risk-Reducing Surgeries in Gynecological Cancers: A Review of the Current State

Risk-Reducing Surgeries in Gynecological Cancers: A Review of the Current State

Gynaecological cancer surveillance for women with Lynch syndrome: systematic review and cost-effectiveness evaluation.

Lynch syndrome is an inherited condition which leads to an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and ovarian cancer. Risk-reducing surgery is generally recommended to manage the risk of gynaecological cancer once childbearing is completed. The value of gynaecological colonoscopic surveillance as an interim measure or instead of risk-reducing surgery is uncertain. We aimed to determine whether gynaecological surveillance was effective and cost-effective in Lynch syndrome. We conducted systematic reviews of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of gynaecological cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome, as well as a systematic review of health utility values relating to cancer and gynaecological risk reduction. Study identification included bibliographic database searching and citation chasing (searches updated 3 August 2021). Screening and assessment of eligibility for inclusion were conducted by independent researchers. Outcomes were prespecified and were informed by clinical experts and patient involvement. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted and results were synthesised narratively. We also developed a whole-disease economic model for Lynch syndrome using discrete event simulation methodology, including natural history components for colorectal, endometrial and ovarian cancer, and we used this model to conduct a cost-utility analysis of gynaecological risk management strategies, including surveillance, risk-reducing surgery and doing nothing. We found 30 studies in the review of clinical effectiveness, of which 20 were non-comparative (single-arm) studies. There were no high-quality studies providing precise outcome estimates at low risk of bias. There is some evidence that mortality rate is higher for surveillance than for risk-reducing surgery but mortality is also higher for no surveillance than for surveillance. Some asymptomatic cancers were detected through surveillance but some cancers were also missed. There was a wide range of pain experiences, including some individuals feeling no pain and some feeling severe pain. The use of pain relief (e.g. ibuprofen) was common, and some women underwent general anaesthetic for surveillance. Existing economic evaluations clearly found that risk-reducing surgery leads to the best lifetime health (measured using quality-adjusted life-years) and is cost-effective, while surveillance is not cost-effective in comparison. Our economic evaluation found that a strategy of surveillance alone or offering surveillance and risk-reducing surgery was cost-effective, except for path_PMS2 Lynch syndrome. Offering only risk-reducing surgery was less effective than offering surveillance with or without surgery. Firm conclusions about clinical effectiveness could not be reached because of the lack of high-quality research. We did not assume that women would immediately take up risk-reducing surgery if offered, and it is possible that risk-reducing surgery would be more effective and cost-effective if it was taken up when offered. There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against gynaecological cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome on clinical grounds, but modelling suggests that surveillance could be cost-effective. Further research is needed but it must be rigorously designed and well reported to be of benefit. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020171098. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129713) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 41. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Multi-gene panel analysis in BRCA1/2-negative patients suspected of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome: Real-world data from a single institution.

Although BRCA1/2 is most frequently associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), many other related genes have been implicated. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of non-BRCA1/2 genes associated with hereditary cancer predisposition in BRCA1/2-negative patients from the Department of Genetic Medicine and Services with breast and ovarian cancer using a multi-gene panel (MGP) analysis. We conducted a retrospective MGP analysis (National Cancer Center Onco-Panel for Familial Cancer; NOP_FC) in BRCA1/2-negative patients with breast, ovarian, and overlapping breast/ovarian cancers who visited our genetic counseling between April 2004 and October 2022. NOP_FC was performed in 128 of the 390 BRCA test-negative cases (117 breast cancer, 9 ovarian cancer, and 2 overlapping breast/ovarian cancer cases). Among the BRCA1/2-negative patients, nine (7.7%) with breast cancer and one (11%) with ovarian cancer had pathogenic variants (PVs) in non-BRCA1/2 genes associated with breast and ovarian cancers, respectively. Five patients had PVs in RAD51D, two in PALB2, one in BARD1, one in ATM, and one in RAD51C. Additional MGP testing of germline genes associated with hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome in BRCA1/2-negative breast and ovarian cancer patients revealed PVs in non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer- and ovarian cancer-related genes in 7.7% of breast cancer and 11% of ovarian cancer. Therefore, additional testing may provide useful information for subsequent risk-reducing surgery and surveillance in BRCA1/2-negative patients.

Sexual Function in Women Diagnosed with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) predisposes women to an increased risk mainly of breast and tubo-ovarian cancer. The aim of the study is to investigate whether being diagnosed with HBOC syndrome is itself a risk factor for sexual dysfunction. An ad hoc questionnaire, including baseline demographic and clinical data, and the Sexual Function Questionnaire 28 (SFQ28) were administered to HBOC female carriers (study group) and to a control group. After propensity score matching (1:1), we enrolled 202 women, 101 in the study group and 101 in the control group. In a multivariate analysis, we finally found that menopausal status was the only risk factor for a significant low score in the domains Desire (HR 0.66; CI95% 0.47-0.93; p = 0.017), Arousal (Lubrication) (HR 0.52; CI95% 0.34-0.80; p = 0.003), Arousal (Cognitive) (HR 0.64; CI95% 0.44-0.95; p = 0.027), and Orgasm (HR 0.33; CI95% (0.16-0.70; p = 0.004), independent of risk-reducing surgery for gynecological malignancy. Psycho-oncology support is a protective factor for the Enjoyment domain (HR 1.38; CI95% 1.05-1.81; p = 0.022). HBOC syndrome itself does not affect SFQ28 domains, while menopausal status significantly influences sexual health, with potential mitigating effects of psycho-oncological support.

Basic knowledge for counseling patients undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Significant progress has been made in the molecular diagnosis of cancer. It provides personalized medicine, including cancer diagnosis, prognosis, targeted therapy, and risk detection. These advances allow physicians to identify patients at risk for cancer before it develops and offer them an opportunity to prevent its development. Mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and 2) are one of the most well-known cancer-related gene mutations since actor Angelina Jolie shared her experience with genetic mutations and risk-reducing surgery in the media. In Korea, tests for germline BRCA1/2 mutations have been covered by insurance since May 2012 and the number of women of BRCA1/2 mutations has continued to increase over the past decade. Most carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations consider risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) resulting in early menopause and want to know the lifetime risks and benefits of RRSO. However, despite the increasing number of carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations, the counseling and management of patients requiring RRSO varies among physicians. This article provides basic knowledge on RRSO to help physicians comprehensively assess its risks and benefits and manage at-risk women.

Demographics and Clinical Decision Making in Patients with Germline Moderate Penetrance Non-BRCA Mutations in Breast Cancer Related Genes.

Management of pathogenic variants in high penetrance genes related to breast cancer (BC), such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, are well established. However, moderate penetrance mutations are understudied. We aim to compare risk reduction decision-making patterns in patients with a moderate penetrance BC-related genetic mutations, without a prior BC diagnosis. Female patients aged ≥ 18 years who tested positive for a BRCA1/2, high penetrance, or moderate penetrance mutation related to BC between 1996 and 2023 without a concurrent or prior BC diagnosis were retrospectively identified from a single academic center's database. Groups were stratified by mutation type: BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCA1, BRCA2), high penetrance mutations (HPM; CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, STK11, TP53), or moderate penetrance mutations (MPM; ATM, BARD1, CHEK2, NF1, RAD51C, RAD51D). Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared. A total of 528 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 66% (n = 350) having a BRCA1/2 mutation, 8% (n = 44) having HPM, and 25% (n = 134) having MPM; the median follow-up was 56.0 months. In our cohort, 20.9% of patients with BRCA mutations, 9.1% with HPM, and 7.5% with MPM chose to undergo risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM). Within the moderate penetrance cohort, patients who chose to undergo RRM were younger at the time of genetic testing (39.4 vs. 47.5 years, p = 0.03) and had a higher number of family members with BC (2 vs. 1, p = 0.05). Our findings provide insights into the demographic characteristics and family history of patients with moderate penetrance mutations and those who pursue risk-reducing surgery.

Comparing Cancer Risk Management between Females with Truncating CHEK2 1100delC versus Missense CHEK2 I157T Variants.

Breast cancer (BC) risks imparted by CHEK2 c.1100delC ("1100delC") germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (GPV) are 20-30%, compared to CHEK2 c.470T>C ("I157T") GPV with <20%, leading to different breast screening recommendations through MRI. We compared cancer risk management (CRM) across these two GPVs. Study participants were adult females with an 1100delC or I157T GPV drawn from the Inherited Cancer Registry (ICARE) across the United States. Cancer history, clinical characteristics, and CRM were compared using chi-squared tests, t-tests, and logistic regression. Of 150 CHEK2 carriers, 40.7% had BC, with a mean age of 50. Comparing 1100delC and I157T GPVs, there were no differences in rates of (1) breast MRI among those with (65.2% versus 55.6% of 23 and 9; p = 0.612) and without (44.0% versus 44.8% of 50 and 29; p = 0.943) BC; (2) risk-reducing mastectomy among those with (50% versus 38.9% of 46 and 15; p = 0.501) and without (13.8% versus 6.5% of 58 and 31; p = 0.296) BC; and (3) risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among those with (24.2% versus 22.2% of 45 and 18; p = 0.852) and without (17.5% versus 16.7% of 57 and 30; p = 0.918) BC. The results suggest over-screening with breast MRI among CHEK2 I157T GPV carriers and possible overuse of risk-reducing surgeries among CHEK2 carriers.

A Multi-Center Retrospective Observational Analysis of Three-Year Experience of Our Protocol for Prevention and Monitoring of Surgical Site Infections in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

With the rise in the mastectomy rate, the number of patients who choose to undergo postmastectomy reconstruction has been increasing, and implant-based procedures are the most performed methods for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Among the possible complications, the most feared is the loss of reconstruction. It can be related to several reasons, but one of the most common is infection of the implant, which can lead to prolonged antibiotic treatment, undesired additional surgical procedures, increased incidence of capsular contracture, and unsatisfactory aesthetics results, with a huge psychological impact on patients. The primary intent of this study is to analyze the status of infection rates at our institution and evaluate the effectiveness of our prevention protocol since its introduction. Secondly, we compared data of the surgical site infections (SSIs) after implant-based breast reconstruction at Trieste Hospital, where the protocol has been employed since 2020, and in another center, where plastic surgeons of our team are involved, with different prevention procedures. We enrolled 396 female patients, who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, using definitive mammary implants or breast tissue expanders, with or without ADM (acellular dermal matrix), both for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 patients. Patients treated at the Hospital of Trieste, with the use of the prevention protocol, were considered the experimental group (group 1), while patients treated in Gorizia by the same breast team with standardized best-practice rules, but without the use of the prevention protocol, were considered the control group (group 2). Infected patients were 5 in the first group (1.7%) and 8 in the second one (7.9%), with a global infection rate of 3.2%. After the introduction of our prevention protocol, we faced a lower incidence of infection after breast surgery with implants or tissue expanders.

Endoscopic and Robotic Assisted Transvaginal Hysterectomy: A Feasibility Study

Purpose: To perform a feasibility study of the novel approach “transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery” (vNOTES) with Da-Vinci robotic assistance. The primary objective of the study is to describe best surgical practices using a case series of robotic-assisted vNOTES in select patients. Methods: An institutional review board approved prospective single-arm, surgical intervention trial was performed. Outcomes measured included operative time, operative complications, estimated blood loss, hemoglobin changes, postoperative pain scores, and need for conversion to traditional robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy via the abdominal approach. Patients who were referred to the gynecology oncology clinic to undergo hysterectomy for benign indications and met the study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria were consented. Patients were included if they had benign causes of abnormal uterine bleeding or pelvic pain, endometrial hyperplasia, cervical dysplasia, need for risk-reducing surgery for hereditary cancer syndromes or need for transgender-affirming surgery. Patients were excluded if they had prior rectal surgery, evidence of fixed uterus, posterior cul-de-sac obliteration and/or adhesions based on physical exam and/or imaging, evidence of narrowed vagina on physical exam, virginity, current pregnancy or history of advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Furthermore, obesity, nulliparity, or no history of spontaneous vaginal delivery are characteristics that may be deemed as risk factors for failure of a transvaginal approach and clinical judgment was used to determine eligibility for study inclusion. Patients deemed eligible were then enrolled for robotic-assisted transvaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy with or without oophorectomy. In the pilot case, the surgery began as a traditional vaginal hysterectomy starting with a posterior colpotomy followed by transection and ligation of the bilateral uterosacral ligaments. Identification of the vesicouterine peritoneal reflection anteriorly was difficult and the GelPoint V-Path was placed only through the posterior colpotomy. The Da Vinci robot was docked and a 0-degree Da Vinci camera, monopolar scissors, Vessel Sealer and AirSeal assist port were placed through the 9.5 cm GelPoint transvaginal platform in a diamond configuration. The Vessel Sealer was used to transect across the uterine arteries. Due to poor visualization, conversion to the traditional abdominal robotic approach was required and the remainder of the surgery was completed in the usual fashion. In the subsequent two cases, a single laparoscopic port was placed abdominally to perform an initial survey of the pelvis. The abdomen was then deflated and the surgery was initiated in a fashion similar to the pilot case. Anterior and posterior colpotomy were successfully performed and the GelPoint platform was optimally placed. Vagina-pneumoperitoneum was obtained to 15 mmHg. In the second case, the 30-degree Da Vinci camera, the Vessel Sealer, ProGrasp Forceps, monopolar scissors, AirSeal assist port and a 9.5 cm GelPoint transvaginal platform were utilized. In the final case, three robotic arms were used rather than four (0-degree Da Vinci camera, the Vessel Sealer, ProGrasp Forceps) along with an AirSeal assist port through a 7 cm GelPoint transvaginal platform to improve ergonomics. The remainder of surgery was completed with robotic assistance with good visualization of the upper abdomen, pelvis and bilateral ureters. The vaginal cuff was closed by placing multiple figure-of-eight sutures similar to a traditional vaginal hysterectomy. Results: Two cases were successfully completed while the pilot case required conversion to the traditional robotic abdominal approach. This was due to difficulty in identifying the anterior vesicouterine peritoneal reflection. Intra-abdominal laparoscopic survey revealed anterior cul-de-sac adhesions with pathology-confirmed endometriosis. The most ergonomic set up was found to consist of three robotic arms (0-degree da Vinci camera, the Vessel sealer, ProGrasp Forceps) and an AirSeal assist port through a 7 cm GelPoint transvaginal platform in a diamond configuration. In the two successful cases, both patients had uncomplicated postoperative courses with pain scores of 2-3 on floor arrival and 0 at their two- and six- week post-op visits. Estimated blood loss of the second and third cases were 75 cc and 30 cc, respectively. The operative time of the third case significantly improved compared to the second case, from 195 minutes to 99 minutes. Conclusion: We demonstrated that robotic-assisted vNOTES is a feasible option in appropriately selected patients. As demonstrated by operative time changes, there exists a learning curve even when performed by experienced robotic surgeons. Compared with traditional vaginal hysterectomy, robotic surgery allows for improved visualization of and access to the adnexal structures and upper abdomen with improved dexterity in comparison to traditional laparoscopy instruments.

Impact of hormone receptor status and tumor subtypes of breast cancer in young BRCA carriers

Hormone receptor expression is a known positive prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer; however, limited evidence exists on its prognostic impact on prognosis of young patients harboring a pathogenic variant (PV) in the BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 genes. This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included young patients (aged ≤40 years) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and harboring germline PVs in BRCA genes. We investigated the impact of hormone receptor status on clinical behavior and outcomes of breast cancer. Outcomes of interest [disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS)] were first investigated according to hormone receptor expression (positive versus negative), and then according to breast cancer subtype [luminal A-like versus luminal B-like versus triple-negative versus human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer]. From 78 centers worldwide, 4709 BRCA carriers were included, of whom 2143 (45.5%) had hormone receptor-positive and 2566 (54.5%) hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Median follow-up was 7.9 years. The rate of distant recurrences was higher in patients with hormone receptor-positive disease (13.1% versus 9.6%, P < 0.001), while the rate of second primary breast cancer was lower (9.1% versus 14.7%, P < 0.001) compared to patients with hormone receptor-negative disease. The 8-year DFS was 65.8% and 63.4% in patients with hormone receptor-positive and negative disease, respectively. The hazard ratio of hormone receptor-positive versus negative disease changed over time for DFS, BCSS, and OS (P < 0.05 for interaction of hormone receptor status and survival time). Patients with luminal A-like breast cancer had the worst long-term prognosis in terms of DFS compared to all the other subgroups (8-year DFS: 60.8% in luminal A-like versus 63.5% in triple-negative versus 65.5% in HER2-positive and 69.7% in luminal B-like subtype). In young BRCA carriers, differences in recurrence pattern and second primary breast cancer among hormone receptor-positive versus negative disease warrant consideration in counseling patients on treatment, follow-up, and risk-reducing surgery.

Novel Cancer Prevention Strategies in Individuals With Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Focus on BRCA1, BRCA2, and Lynch Syndrome.

Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer elevated risks of breast, ovarian, and other cancers. Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with increased risks of multiple cancer types including colorectal and uterine cancers. Current cancer risk mitigation strategies have focused on pharmacologic risk reduction, enhanced surveillance, and preventive surgeries. While these approaches can be effective, they stand to be improved on because of either limited efficacy or undesirable impact on quality of life. The current review summarizes ongoing investigational efforts in cancer risk prevention strategies for patients with germline PVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, or LS-associated genes. These efforts span radiation, surgery, and pharmacology including vaccine strategies. Understanding the molecular events involved in the premalignant to malignant transformation in high-risk individuals may ultimately contribute significantly to novel prevention strategies.

Impact of hormone receptor status and tumor subtypes on clinical behavior and outcomes of breast cancer in young BRCA carriers.

504 Background: Hormone receptor expression is a known positive prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer (BC). Among young patients harboring germline BRCA1or BRCA2 (BRCA) pathogenic variants (PVs), most of the tumors arising in BRCA2carriers express hormone receptors, while most BC cases in BRCA1 carriers do not; however, limited evidence exists on the impact of hormone receptor status on clinical behavior and outcomes in young patients harboring BRCA PVs. Methods: This is an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study including young patients (≤40 years) diagnosed with invasive BC between January 2000 and December 2020, harboring germline PVs in BRCA genes. Our analysis investigates the impact of hormone receptor status on clinical behavior and outcomes of BC. The type and pattern of recurrence and survival outcomes (disease-free survival [DFS], BC specific survival [BCSS] and overall survival [OS]) were first investigated according to hormone receptors expression (positive vs. negative), and then according to BC subtype (luminal A-like vs. luminal B-like vs. triple-negative vs. HER2-positive BC). Results: From 78 centers worldwide, 4,709 BRCA carriers were included in this analysis, of whom 2,143 (45.5%) had hormone receptor-positive and 2,566 (54.5%) hormone receptor-negative BC. Patients with hormone receptor-positive BC were more likely to harbor BRCA2 PVs while less frequently had grade 3 tumors and nodal involvement. Median follow-up was 7.88 (IQR 4.47-12.61) years. The rate of distant recurrences was higher in patients with hormone receptor-positive BC (13.1% vs. 9.6%, p&lt;.001), while the rate of second primary BC was lower (9.1% vs. 14.7%, p&lt;.001) when compared to patients with hormone receptor-negative disease. The 8-years DFS was 65.8% in patients with hormone receptor-positive and 63.4% in those with hormone receptor-negative BC. No differences in terms of OS nor BCSS were observed. The hazard ratio of hormone receptor-positive vs. negative disease changed over time for DFS, BCSS, and OS (p&lt;.05 for interactions of hormone receptor status and survival time). Among the 4,363 patients eligible for subtypes analysis, 612 had luminal A-like, 1,038 luminal B-like, 2,373 triple-negative and 340 HER2-positive BC. Patients with Luminal A-like BC had the worst long-term prognosis in terms of DFS compared to all the other subgroups (8-years DFS: 60.8% in luminal A-like vs. 63.5% in triple-negative vs. 65.5% in HER2-positive and 69.7% in luminal B-like subtype). Conclusions: In young BRCAPVs carriers with early BC, hormone receptor status did not appear to be a positive prognostic factor. The differences in pattern of recurrence and second primary BC among hormone receptor-positive vs. negative disease warrants consideration in counseling patients on treatment, follow-up strategies and indication for risk-reducing surgery.