Risk Of Vascular Access Complications Research Articles

1050 ULTRASOUND GUIDED CANNULATION OF FEMORAL ARTERY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

Abstract Background Vascular access complications are a significant source of morbidity and mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Ultrasound-guided cannulation (UGC) of central veins or arteries is a widely used approach for patients undergoing invasive procedures. Whether UGC significantly decreases the risk of vascular access complications also for large-bore access procedures, such as TAVR, lacks evidence Objectives in this study, we aimed to evaluate the benefits of routine use of UGC in patients undergoing TAVR. Methods Data were retrospectively collected from two high-volume TAVR centers from September 2009 to March 2022. UGC was performed using a two-dimensional ultrasound short-axis views, while manual palpation, fluoroscopy, or contralateral angiography were used for the other patients. The odds ratio (OR) for vascular complications was calculated using a multivariate logistic regression model including as dependent variables all relevant baseline and procedural characteristics (forward stepwise selection process). Vascular complications were adjudicated according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions 3. Results Out of 874 patients included in the study, UGC access was performed in 177 subjects. Overall mean age was 80.2±5.8 years old, 60% of patients were females, 35.5% had diabetes, 61.4% had dyslipidemia, and 27.8% had chronic kidney disease, with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 52.7±9.7%. Looking at the procedural variables Euroscore II was 5.8±5.4, second and third valves generation have been used in 85% of the cases, while suture-based closure devices in 84% of subjects. After adjustment for clinical and procedural variables, routinely use of UGC was associated with a lower rate of total [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15% to 0.95%)] and major vascular complications [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05% to 0.75%)], while no differences were observed for minor vascular complications. Conclusions Routinely use of UGC significantly decreases the risk of vascular complications in patients undergoing TAVR. However, a dedicated randomized clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of this approach is warranted to confirm our results in this high-risk population.

Treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with multidose oritavancin: A case series and literature review

Osteomyelitis remains difficult to treat, typically requiring a prolonged course of intravenous (i.v.) antibiotics. The optimal route and duration of antibiotics remains ill-defined due to limited prospective clinical trials. Oritavancin is a long-acting, semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with rapid concentration-dependent bactericidal activity against many Gram-positive organisms. Favourable pharmacokinetics makes oritavancin an appealing alternative to currently available antibiotics requiring daily infusion to decrease the risk of vascular access complications associated with outpatient antimicrobial therapy. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of nine patients with chronic osteomyelitis receiving multidose oritavancin. Using electronic medical records, patients aged ≥18 years treated with i.v. oritavancin between September 2015 and April 2018 at Downtown Dublin Wound Center, a hospital-owned outpatient wound care clinic and infusion centre affiliated with Meadows Regional Health System in Dublin, GA, were identified. Of 12 cases reviewed, 9 patients received at least two doses of i.v. oritavancin for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. All nine patients experienced clinical cure at 6-month follow-up after the last dose of oritavancin. Multidose oritavancin was found to be a safe and efficacious option for chronic osteomyelitis when treatment options are limited by patient complexities or barriers in their ability to access healthcare services.

Feasibility of Performing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation and Endomyocardial Biopsy in the Same Setting

In patients with unexplained cardiomyopathy, electroanatomical mapping can identify abnormal tissue to target during electrophysiology-guided endomyocardial biopsy (EP-guided EMB). The objective of this study is to determine whether catheter ablation performed in the same setting as EP-guided EMB increases procedural risk. Sixty-seven patients (mean age 54.4 ± 13.8, 57% male) undergoing EP-guided EMB were included. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 17 patients (25%) for ventricular arrhythmias and in 2 (3%) for typical atrial flutter. Femoral arterial access was obtained in 90% ablation patients and 40% biopsy-only patients; vascular access complications were more common in the ablation group than in the EMB-only group (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in rate of tricuspid regurgitation, thromboembolism, or pericardial effusion, whether procedural anticoagulation was used. In conclusion, catheter ablation and procedural anticoagulation can be combined with EP-guided EMB with an increased risk of vascular access complications, but no significant increase in intracardiac complications.

Emergency Department Visits During Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy: A Cohort Study

BackgroundOutpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) carries risk of vascular access complications, antimicrobial adverse effects, and worsening of infection. Both OPAT-related and unrelated events may lead to emergency department (ED) visits. The purpose of this study was to describe adverse events that result in ED visits and risk factors associated with ED visits during OPAT.MethodsOPAT courses between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016 at Cleveland Clinic were identified from the institution’s OPAT registry. ED visits within 30 days of OPAT initiation were reviewed. Reasons and potential risk factors for ED visits were sought in the medical record.ResultsAmong 11,440 OPAT courses during the study period, 603 (5%) were associated with 1 or more ED visits within 30 days of OPAT initiation. Mean patient age was 58 years and 57% were males. 379 ED visits (49%) were OPAT-related; the most common visit reason was vascular access complication, which occurred in 211 (56%) of OPAT-related ED visits. The most common vascular access complications were occlusion and dislodgement, which occurred in 99 and 34 patients (47% and 16% of vascular access complications, respectively). In a multivariable logistic regression model, at least one prior ED visit in the preceding year (prior ED visit) was most strongly associated with one or more ED visits during an OPAT course (OR 2.96, 95% CI 2.38 – 3.71, p-value < 0.001). Other significant factors were younger age (p 0.01), female sex (p 0.01), home county residence (P < 0.001), and having a PICC (p 0.05). 549 ED visits (71%) resulted in discharge from the ED within 24 hours, 18 (2%) left against medical advice, 46 (6%) were observed up to 24 hours, and 150 ED visits (20%) led to hospital admission. Prior ED visit was not associated with hospital admission among patients who visited the ED during OPAT.ConclusionOPAT-related ED visits are most often due to vascular access complications, especially line occlusions. Patients with a prior ED visit in the preceding year have a 3-fold higher odds of at least one ED visit during OPAT compared with patients without a prior ED visit. A strategy of managing occlusions at home and a focus on patients with prior ED visits could potentially prevent a substantial proportion of OPAT-related ED visits.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Vascular complications from resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: Life over limb?

Vascular complications from resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) have been reported in as high as 13% with some patients requiring lower-extremity amputation. We sought to review our institution series of REBOA and assess our vascular complications. Retrospective review of all patients undergoing REBOA from October 2011 through July 2016. Data were gathered from the Memorial Hermann Trauma Registry and the hospital electronic medical records. Operative details and vascular injuries from arterial access for REBOA insertion were recorded. Forty-eight patients underwent REBOA during our study period. Thirty-eight had the 14 Fr. system placed and 10 had the 7 Fr. system placed. Of the 24 surviving the removal of the 14 Fr. sheath, 19 had primary repair of the arteriotomy without vascular complication. The other five required additional vascular procedures to repair arteriotomy with no lower-extremity amputations. There were no vascular complications of sheath removal with the 7 Fr. system, with no amputations. Implementation of REBOA can be done safely without increased risk of vascular access complications or limb loss. The 14 Fr. system will more likely require further vascular procedures to address the access site, whereas the 7 Fr. system will not. Therapeutic/care management, level II.

Feasibility and Safety of Coronary Procedures via an Arteriovenous Graft Approach in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Traditionally, a radial or brachial arterial approach is unadvisable in hemodialysis patients. Consequently, coronary angiography or angioplasty is usually performed via a femoral artery approach in these patients, who carry a higher risk of vascular access complications. In hemodialysis patients, arteriovenous grafts (AVG) are created for repeated punctures; however, the feasibility and safety of a trans-AVG approach for coronary angiography or angioplasty remains unclear. In our institution, cardiac catheterizations were attempted via AV grafts in hemodialysis patients with a U-shaped forearm AVG. We retrospectively identified coronary angiography or angioplasty procedures in hemodialysis patients from a computer-based database in our hospital. The procedure details and outcomes were obtained from review of the clinical, angiographic and hemodialysis records. From 2008 to 2013, 167 procedures in hemodialysis patients were identified from 2866 diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures in our institution. Out of these, 24 procedures in 17 patients were performed via a trans-AVG approach. In all AVG procedures, a 6F 16-cm or 7F 10-cm sheath was placed from the AVG into the brachial artery. All diagnostic procedures were successfully performed. In 14 procedures, the patients also underwent angioplasty and all of the angioplasty procedures were successful. There was no arterial spasm, arterial dissection, puncture site hematoma, or acute thrombosis of the AVG during or after the procedures. A trans-AVG approach appears to be a feasible and safe route for coronary angiography or angioplasty in hemodialysis patients with a U-shaped forearm AVG. However, further studies with a larger patient number are necessary. Arteriovenous graft; Hemodialysis; Percutaneous coronary intervention.

Vascular access complications during outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy at home: a retrospective cohort study.

The need for indwelling vascular access for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) places patients at risk of vascular access complications. The purpose of this study was to describe vascular access complications during OPAT at home, and identify factors associated with their occurrence. All OPAT courses carried out at home for patients at Cleveland Clinic in 2013 were identified from the institution's OPAT registry. The first OPAT course per patient was included. Vascular access complications that occurred during the treatment course were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Only complications that triggered a clinical intervention were included. The 1461 included OPAT courses encompassed 33,579 OPAT days of treatment. One-hundred-and-forty-four vascular access complications occurred in 131 OPAT courses (9% of OPAT courses, 4.29 complications per 1000 OPAT days). The most common complication was occlusion (53% of all complications). Hickman catheters [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.20, 95% CI 0.03-0.63] and indwelling ports (IRR 0.25, 95% CI 0.04-0.78) were associated with lower complication rates than peripherally inserted central catheters, as was increasing age (IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00). Log OPAT duration (IRR 1.60, 95% CI 1.28-2.03), female sex (IRR 1.62, 95% CI 1.16-2.28) and injection drug use (IRR 3.32, 1.16-7.46) were associated with increased risk of vascular access complications. Nine percent of OPAT courses at home have at least one vascular access complication requiring clinical intervention. Longer OPAT duration, younger age, female sex and injection drug use are associated with increased risk of vascular access complications.

Venous hemostasis postcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation while under therapeutic levels of oral and intravenous anticoagulation.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) requires utilizing multiple venous femoral sheaths in conjunction with aggressive periprocedural anticoagulation, which can lead to increased risk of vascular access complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the "figure-of-eight" ("F-8") suture technique for femoral venous hemostasis while on therapeutic doses of intravenous anticoagulation at the time of sheath removal. In this case-control analysis, 376 consecutive patients underwent AF ablation while on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation and received intraprocedural heparin. In the first 253 patients (the control group), manual pressure was used for femoral venous hemostasis after reversal of heparin effects. The subsequent 123 patients (the F-8 group) had femoral venous hemostasis using the F-8 suture technique and while under therapeutic heparin effects. The F-8 subcutaneous suture technique achieved adequate venous hemostasis in 98.4% of patients. As compared to the control group, there was significantly less frequent utilization of the FemoStop compression assist device (1.2 vs. 16.8%, p < 0.0001) and in a significantly shorter interval (6.8 ± 5.7 vs. 50.7 ± 12.2 min, p < 0.0001). Vascular access complications and thromboembolic events occurred in 9.8% in the F-8 group vs. 13.0% in the control group (p = 0.678). Immediate hemostasis of the femoral venous access sites after insertion of multiple sheaths for AF ablation in the presence of anticoagulation can be safely and effectively achieved using the F-8 suture technique. This technique helps minimize the period of inadequate anticoagulation immediately following ablation and shortens the time required to achieve adequate hemostasis.

Systemic or Endoventricular Thrombolysis to Treat HeartWare Left Ventricle Assist Device Thrombosis: A Clinical Dilemma.

Endoventricular thrombolytic procedure (ETP) has been used to treat continuous-flow left ventricle assist device (CF-LVAD) thrombosis. The study aims to investigate the occurrence of complications after ETP. Data were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed in a series of patients who underwent CF-LVAD followed by ETP. Since November 2010, 20 patients underwent HeartWare CF-LVAD implantation at our institute. Four patients (20%) developed pump thrombosis and underwent a total of nine ETPs with tissue plasminogen activator infused into the left ventricle. The mean age was 60.2 ± 9 years. ETP was performed via either the femoral (n = 6) or radial artery (n = 3). Five ETPs (55.5%) were complicated by left and right radial artery occlusion, two by groin hematomas, and one by femoral artery false aneurysm. ETP carries a strong risk of vascular access complications that, in CF-LVAD patients, may add to the already complex clinical profile and economic burden; thus, a less invasive treatment is advisable whenever required.

What Is the Optimal International Normalized Ratio for Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation? Pick Your Poison (Dose)

In this issue of Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology , Kim et al1 evaluate the relationship between the international normalized ratio (INR) level on the day of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and the rate of periprocedural complications. With the expanding role of ablation in the treatment of AF, defining the optimal strategy for managing anticoagulation therapy in the periprocedural period is crucial to avoid both bleeding and thromboembolic complications. Prior studies have shown that uninterrupted therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin may be the safest approach because it avoids significant fluctuations in anticoagulation.2–5 When warfarin is held before the procedure and then resumed, the use of unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin as bridging therapy becomes necessary. When warfarin is continued during the periprocedural period, bridging is unnecessary, but the optimal range of INR is not known. Kim et al1 try to address this question in their retrospective study by examining categories of INR and the risk of vascular access complications, cardiac tamponade, bleeding, and thromboembolism in 1133 patients who underwent the AF ablation for >2-year …

Risk of Vascular Access Complications with Frequent Hemodialysis

Frequent hemodialysis requires using the vascular access more often than with conventional hemodialysis, but whether this increases the risk for access-related complications is unknown. In two separate trials, we randomly assigned 245 patients to receive in-center daily hemodialysis (6 days per week) or conventional hemodialysis (3 days per week) and 87 patients to receive home nocturnal hemodialysis (6 nights per week) or conventional hemodialysis, for 12 months. The primary vascular access outcome was time to first access event (repair, loss, or access-related hospitalization). Secondary outcomes were time to all repairs and time to all losses. In the Daily Trial, 77 (31%) of 245 patients had a primary outcome event: 33 repairs and 15 losses in the daily group and 17 repairs, 11 losses, and 1 hospitalization in the conventional group. Overall, the risk for a first access event was 76% higher with daily hemodialysis than with conventional hemodialysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-2.79; P=0.017); among the 198 patients with an arteriovenous (AV) access at randomization, the risk was 90% higher with daily hemodialysis (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.11-3.25; P=0.02). Daily hemodialysis patients had significantly more total AV access repairs than conventional hemodialysis patients (P=0.011), with 55% of all repairs involving thrombectomy or surgical revision. Losses of AV access did not differ between groups (P=0.58). We observed similar trends in the Nocturnal Trial, although the results were not statistically significant. In conclusion, frequent hemodialysis increases the risk of vascular access complications. The nature of the AV access repairs suggests that this risk likely results from increased hemodialysis frequency rather than heightened surveillance.

Strategies to reduce the risk of transvenous lead extraction: an example using a hybrid approach in a patient with a haemodialysis fistula

Haemodialysis (HD) patients are at increased risk of vascular access complications with device therapy. We report a case of transvenous defibrillator lead extraction from the ipsilateral side as an HD fistula. The procedure was successfully performed using a hybrid approach, with extraction of the lead with a powered sheath, and surgical cut-down and closure of the subclavian vein defect.