Risk Of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding Research Articles

Assessment of Risks for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Brain Injury

The aim of the study was to develop a risk model for upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) bleeding in patients with brain injury of various etiologies.Material and methods. Case histories of 33 patients were included into a retrospective descriptive study: 22 patients had severe brain injury of various etiologies, and 11 patients after elective surgery for cerebral aneurisms with uneventful postop period were taken for comparison. The patients were grouped in two arms: Group 1 included patients with obvious signs of GIT bleeding (N=11) and Group 2 had no obvious signs of bleeding (N=22). Complaints, life and medical history, comorbidities, specialists’ exams data, results of laboratory and instrumental examinations, therapeutic regimens were analyzed. Presence of disproportionate pathologic sympathetic overreaction to acute brain injury, i.e., paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH), was assessed on admission and on Days 1, 3 and 5 after brain injury. Results. A model for upper GIT bleeding risk assessment was designed using logistic regression. The resulting model gains high quality rating: χ²=33,78, 3; p<0,001; OR=315. The risk of upper GIT bleeding exceeded 95% in patients having combination of 4 symptoms in their medical history (presence of PSH on Day 1 after acute brain injury; Karnofsky performance scale index 75; lack of neurovegetative stabilization in the acute period of brain injury; gastric and/or duodenal ulcer).Conclusion. Determining the risk factors thresholds enables stratification of patients by the risk for upper GIT bleeding. Modification of the identified four risk factors (presence of PSH on Day 1after acute brain injury; Karnofsky performance scale index 75; lack of neurovegetative stabilization in the acute period of brain injury; gastric and/or duodenal ulcer) will probably reduce the occurrence of upper GIT bleeding in patients with acute brane injury of various etiology.

Use of Antidepressants and the Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding: A Case-control Study

PurposeTo investigate the association between the use of antidepressants and the risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB). MethodsA Case-control study was conducted in a Brazilian hospital complex. Cases were defined as patients with a diagnosis of UGIB and controls as patients admitted for reasons unrelated to gastrointestinal bleeding, gastric concerns, or complications associated with low-dose aspirin (LDA) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use. Sociodemographic and clinical data, comorbidities, drug therapy in use (long-term use and self-medication), and lifestyle habits were recorded through face-to-face interviews. Two groups were defined: use of antidepressants in general and use of antidepressants according to their affinity for serotonin transporters. The presence of synergism between the concomitant use of antidepressants and LDA or NSAIDs on the risk of UGIB was also explored. FindingsA total of 906 participants were recruited (200 in the case group and 706 in the control group). The use of antidepressants was not associated with the risk of UGIB (odds ratio [OR] = 1.503; 95% CI, 0.78–2.88) or the use of antidepressants with high affinity for serotonin receptors (OR = 1.983; 95% CI, 0.81–4.85). An increased risk of UGIB was observed in concomitant users of antidepressants and LDA (OR = 5.489; 95% CI, 1.60–18.81) or NSAIDs (OR = 18.286; 95% CI, 3.18–105.29). Despite the lack of significance, the use of antidepressants appears to be a positive modifier of UGIB risk in LDA and NSAID users. ImplicationsThese findings indicate an increased risk of UGIB in concomitant users of antidepressants and LDA or NSAIDs, suggesting the need to monitor antidepressant users, especially those most likely to develop UGIB. In addition, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.

The Impact of Novel Anticoagulants on the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Mucosa.

Background and objectives: Although treatment with novel oral non-vitamin K antagonist 3anticoagulants (NOACs) is associated with an overall decrease in hemorrhagic complications compared to warfarin, the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding remains contradictory. Materials and Methods: After the exclusion of patients with pre-existing pathological lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) on esophageal-gastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at entry, a cohort of 80 patients (mean age of 74.8 ± 2.0 years) was randomly divided into four equivalent groups, treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or warfarin. Patients were prospectively followed up for three months of treatment, with a focus on anamnestic and endoscopic signs of bleeding. In addition, bleeding risk factors were evaluated. Results: In none of the patients treated with warfarin or NOACs was any serious or clinically significant bleeding recorded within the follow-up period. The incidence of clinical bleeding and endoscopically detected bleeding in the upper GT after three months of treatment was not statistically different among groups (χ2 = 2.8458; p = 0.41608). The presence of Helicobacter pylori (HP) was a risk factor for upper GIT bleeding (p < 0.05), while the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) was a protective factor (p = 0.206; Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.205). We did not record any post-biopsy continued bleeding. Conclusions: No significant GIT bleeding was found in any of the treatment groups, so we consider it beneficial to perform routine EGD before the initiation of any anticoagulant therapy in patients with an increased risk of upper GIT bleeding. Detection and eradication of HP as well as preventive PPI treatment may mitigate the occurrence of endoscopic bleeding. Endoscopic biopsy during the NOAC treatment is safe.

Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding Associated With Naproxen Sodium vs Ibuprofen

The risk of gastrointestinal tract bleeding requiring hospitalization associated with naproxen sodium was compared with that with ibuprofen, using a prescription database to approximate over-the-counter dosing. To evaluate the safety of naproxen sodium. A claims database containing Ohio Medicaid data from January 1986 through February 1993 and Michigan Medicaid data from April 1983 through July 1993 was used to compare 101,318 patients dispensed naproxen sodium with 277,601 patients dispensed ibuprofen. Using a case-cohort design, all 59 patients from the full cohort who had been hospitalized with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB) that developed within 14 days after the first prescription for the study drugs were compared with a subcohort made up of a 10% random sample of subjects selected from the combined drug cohorts. The incidence of UGIB occurring within 14 days after the first prescription in the naproxen sodium cohort was 26 (0.026%) of 101,318 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.017%-0.038%), compared with 33 (0.012%) of 277,601 patients (95% CI, 0.008%-0.017%) in the ibuprofen cohort. Overall, the use of naproxen sodium vs ibuprofen was associated with an adjusted relative risk of 2.0 (95% CI, 1.1-3.8). Among people with multiple prescriptions, the crude relative risk for those receiving therapy in a dose typical of over-the-counter use was 4.1 (95% CI, 1.2-13.8). The overall incidence of UGIB is low with both drugs. There is little additional absolute risk posed by the use of low-dose naproxen sodium, compared with low-dose ibuprofen, despite an increased relative risk. However, given the widespread use of these drugs, a substantial number of additional cases of UGIB could result from use of naproxen sodium. This increased risk should be considered, especially for patients whose baseline risk of UGIB is elevated.

Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding From Oral Potassium Chloride

A retrospective cohort study was performed to assess the relative risk of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract bleeding from two formulations of potassium chloride. Relevant information was obtained from 1980 through 1984 Medicaid billing data from the states of Michigan, Minnesota, Florida, and Ohio. After patients with a history of UGI tract bleeding prior to their first prescription for either of the two potassium chloride preparations under study were excluded, data were analyzed for 28,790 patients (143,512 patient-months) dispensed a microencapsulated formulation exclusively and 76,118 patients (560,341 patient-months) dispensed a wax-matrix formulation exclusively. The risk of UGI tract bleeding within 30 days after each prescription for the drug of interest was examined. After sampling from the undiseased study subjects and adjusting for multiple potential confounding variables using logistic regression, an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.67 (0.52 to 0.85) was observed.