Risk Of Serious Infections Research Articles

Effect of correcting iron deficiency on the risk of serious infection in heart failure: Insights from the IRONMAN trial.

Concerns exist that intravenous (IV) iron might increase the risk of infections. The IRONMAN trial provided an opportunity to investigate whether giving IV ferric derisomaltose (FDI) to patients with heart failure and iron deficiency alters the rate of hospitalization or death due to infections. IRONMAN was a randomized trial of IV FDI versus usual care in patients with symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45%, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20% or ferritin <100 μg/L. Infection was a pre-specified, blindly-adjudicated, safety endpoint. The primary analysis of interest was infection as the main reason for hospitalization or death, using first and recurrent events analyses. The composite primary event of interest tended to be lower in those randomized to FDI when analysed as first (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.01, p = 0.055) or recurrent event (rate ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.64-1.13, p = 0.089). The composite results were driven by fewer hospitalizations for infection (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.49-0.98, p = 0.032), with 5% fewer patients (absolute reduction) experiencing such an event if assigned to FDI. Similar trends were observed for recurrent events (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62-1.10). Further analyses suggested that the reduction in hospitalizations due to infection with FDI was restricted to patients with TSAT <20%. In patients with heart failure and a reduced LVEF, correction of iron deficiency is not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization or death from infection, and may reduce such events, especially when TSAT is <20%. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02642562.

Recovery from rituximab-associated persistent hypogammaglobulinaemia in children with nephrotic syndrome.

There are limited data on the long-term outcomes and risk factors for non-recovery after development of rituximab (RTX)-associated persistent hypogammaglobulinaemia among children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (NS). A nationwide Japanese survey was conducted to determine the prognosis of patients with childhood-onset idiopathic NS who developed persistent hypogammaglobulinaemia after RTX administration. Specifically, predictors of IgG level recovery and risk factors for serious infection were examined. The cohort comprised 118 patients (66.1% boys; median age at initial RTX administration, 7.5 years). Among the 121 patients diagnosed with persistent hypogammaglobulinaemia, only 31 (26.3%) recovered within a median observation period of 2.8 years; approximately 70% of patients continued to exhibit persistent hypogammaglobulinaemia. Among the patients who recovered from hypogammaglobulinaemia, the median time to recovery was 14.1 months. Patients with a history of steroid-resistant NS were less likely to recover from persistent hypogammaglobulinaemia (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.87). In addition, of the 118 eligible patients, 18 (15.3%) developed serious infections requiring hospitalization, and the main risk factor for infection during hypogammaglobulinaemia was agranulocytosis (a well-known adverse effect of RTX in children). A significant portion of patients with RTX-associated persistent hypogammaglobulinaemia did not exhibit recovery even after 1 year. Moreover, the data indicate that patients with a history of steroid-resistant NS have a significantly lower probability of recovering from this condition. Agranulocytosis under hypogammaglobulinaemia was significantly associated with an elevated risk of serious infections.

First Report of a Fatal Septicemia Case Caused by Vibrio metoecus: A Comprehensive Functional and Genomic Study

Abstract Background In recent years, we have witnessed an unprecedented increase in the incidence of vibriosis due to global warming. Vibrio metoecus is a recently described Vibrio cholerae-like species that has not been associated with septicemia death in humans. During follow-up of human vibriosis, we received a blood isolate from a patient with secondary septicemia who died a few hours after admission. Methods Phenotypic and genotypic methods failed to identify the isolate, which could only be identified by average nucleotide identity after genome sequencing. The isolate was subjected to in vitro and ex vivo assays, complemented by comparative genomics focused on the identification of unique genetic traits. Strains and genomes from the same and related species (V. cholerae and Vibrio mimicus) were used for analyses. Results The isolate was the only one able to resist and multiply in human serum. Its genome contained virulence genes shared with V. mimicus and/or V. cholerae, with those associated with sialic acid degradation within pathogenicity island 2 standing out. However, it also presented a unique gene cluster, flanked by a transposase gene, putatively related to surface polysaccharide pseudosialyzation. Conclusions We document the first case of death caused by septicemia due to V. metoecus and propose that the acquisition of surface pseudosialyzation genes explains the ability of certain isolates of this species to survive in blood. Our discovery underscores the urgent need to monitor and study newly emerging pathogenic species, as climate change may be facilitating their spread and increasing the risk of serious infections in humans.

Prodrug Nanomedicine for Synovium Targeted Therapy of Inflammatory Arthritis: Insights from Animal Model and Human Synovial Joint Fluid.

Many patients cannot tolerate low-dose weekly methotrexate (MTX) therapy for inflammatory arthritis treatment due to life-threatening toxicity. Although biologics offer a target-specific therapy, it raises the risk of serious infections and even cancer due to immune system suppression. We introduce an anti-inflammatory arthritis MTX ester prodrug using a long-circulating biocompatible polymeric macromolecule: folic acid (FA) functionalized hyperbranched polyglycerol (HPG). In vitro the drug MTX is incrementally released through pH and enzymatic degradation over 2 weeks. The role of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in site-specific prodrug activation was verified using synovial fluid (SF) of 26 rheumatology patients and 4 healthy controls. Elevated levels of specific MMPs-markers of joint inflammation-positively correlated with enhanced prodrug release explained by acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of esters by proteases. Intravenously administered 111In-radiolabeled prodrug confirmed by SPECT/CT imaging that it accumulated preferentially in inflamed joints while reducing off-target side-effects in a mouse model of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Added FA as a targeting vector prolonged prodrug action; prodrug with 4x less MTX applied every 2 weeks was as effective as weekly MTX therapy. The preclinical results suggest a prodrug-based strategy for the treatment of inflammatory joint diseases, with potential for other chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer.

Incident Benzodiazepine and Z-Drug Use and Subsequent Risk of Serious Infections.

Animal studies have suggested a link between benzodiazepine and related Z-drug (BZDR) use and immune dysfunction. Corresponding evidence in humans is limited and focuses mainly on pneumonia. This study aimed to assess the association of incident BZDR use with subsequent development of serious infections. This Swedish register-based study included a population-based demographically matched cohort, a co-twin control cohort, and an active comparator cohort. Out of 7,362,979 individuals aged below 65 years who were BZDR naïve by 2007, 713,896 BZDR recipients with incident dispensation of any BZDRs between 2007 and 2019 were 1:1 matched to 713,896 nonrecipients from the general population; 9197 BZDR recipients were compared with their 9298 unexposed co-twins/co-multiples; and 434,900 BZDR recipients were compared with 428,074 incident selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) recipients. The outcomes were identified by the first inpatient or specialist outpatient diagnosis of serious infections in the National Patient Register, or death from any infections recorded as the underlying cause in the Cause of Death Register. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted and controlled for multiple confounders, including familial confounding and confounding by indication. To study a possible dose-response association, the cumulative dosage of BZDRs dispensed during the follow-up was estimated for each BZDR recipient and modeled as a time-varying exposure with dose categories in tertiles [≤ 20 defined daily doses (DDDs), > 20 DDDs ≤ 65, and > 65 DDDs). The risk of infections was assessed in BZDR recipients within each category of the cumulative BZDR dosage compared to their demographically matched nonrecipients. In the demographically matched cohort (average age at incident BZDR use 42.8 years, 56.9% female), the crude incidence rate of any serious infections in BZDR recipients and matched nonrecipients during 1-year follow-up was 4.18 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 4.13-4.23] and 1.86 (95% CI 1.83-1.89) per 100 person-years, respectively. After controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and pharmacological confounders, BZDR use was associated with 83% relative increase in risk of any infections [hazard ratio (HR) 1.83, 95% CI 1.79-1.89]. The risk remained increased, although attenuated, in the co-twin cohort (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23-1.97) and active comparator cohort (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.30-1.35). The observed risks were similar across different types of initial BZDRs and across individual BZDRs, and the risks increased with age at BZDR initiation. We also observed a dose-response association between cumulative BZDR dosage and risk of serious infections. BZDR initiation was associated with increased risks of serious infections,even when considering unmeasured familial confounding and confounding by indication. The exact pathways through which BZDRs may affect immune function, however, remain unclear. Further studies are needed to explore the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the association between BZDR use and serious infections, as it can lead to safer therapeutic strategies for patients requiring BZDR.

S1059 Risk of Serious Infections in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Treated with Tofacitinib Compared to Biologic Treatments in the United States

S1059 Risk of Serious Infections in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Treated with Tofacitinib Compared to Biologic Treatments in the United States

Comparative Risk of Serious Infection With Vedolizumab vs Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Comparative Risk of Serious Infection With Vedolizumab vs Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Epidemiology of Elderly Onset IBD: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

We examined the incidence and natural history of patients with very elderly onset (herein referred to as very late-onset) inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) (≥ 70 years of age at diagnosis), compared with patients diagnosed between 60 and 69 years of age in Denmark. In the Danish National Patient Register, between 1980 and 2018, we identified all individuals ≥ 60 years of age with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and examined trends in incidence, cumulative risk of hospitalization, treatment patterns, IBD-related surgery, serious infection, cancer and cardiovascular and venous thromboembolic risks among very late-onset (70-79 years of age or 80+ years) vs late-onset (60-69 years of age) IBD, using nonparametric competing risk analysis treating death as competing risk. We identified 3459 patients with onset of CD at ≥60 years of age (47% ≥ 70 years of age) and 10,774 patients with onset of UC ≥60 years of age (51% ≥ 70 years of age). Over the last 3 decades, incidence changes for very late-onset and late-onset IBD have followed the same patterns. Also, both for CD and UC, cumulative incidence of IBD-related hospitalization and corticosteroid use was comparable in very late-onset vs late-onset patients. However, the burden of disease-modifying therapy, either immunomodulator or tumor necrosis factor antagonist use, and major IBD-related surgery was significantly lower in patients with very late-onset than in late-onset IBD. On the other hand, the 5-year risk of serious infections and cardiovascular events was higher in patients with very late-onset IBD. This nationwide cohort study shows that patients diagnosed with very late-onset (≥ 70 years of age) IBD have a higher relative burden of disease- and aging-related complications, with limited use of steroid-sparing strategies and surgery, compared with late-onset IBD.

Low-Dose Glucocorticoids in Older Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: What Does the Evidence Say?

The short-term use of glucocorticoids (GCs) in combination with methotrexate was recommended for the initial treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by the European League Against Rheumatism. A randomized controlled trial (GLORIA) showed that treatment of older patients with low-dose GCs in combination with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs was more efficacious than disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs plus placebo in terms of disease activity control and prevention of joint destruction. Glucocorticoid-related adverse events were likely to increase relative to placebo, with no increase in serious adverse events and fractures over 2 years. Observational studies showed an increased risk of serious infections, cardiovascular events, and fractures associated with long-term continuation of GCs in older patients, but the adverse events may be associated not only with GC toxicity but also with poor disease control of rheumatoid arthritis. In the GLORIA study, low-dose GCs during 2 years could be tapered off safely, but many patients had a flare of disease activity after discontinuation of GCs. In the two representative large Japanese registries (IORRA and NinJa), the proportion of patients using GCs and non-tumor necrosis factor inhibitors increased with increasing age at disease onset, with a decreasing trend in methotrexate use. The proportion of patients in remission with GC treatment also increased with increasing age at onset. These suggested that it is not easy to discontinue GCs in older patients. If GCs cannot be terminated in the short term, it may be acceptable to use GCs to control disease activity for up to 2 years.

Staphylococci, Reptiles, Amphibians, and Humans: What Are Their Relations?

Reptiles and amphibians are largely present in many environments, including domestic areas when they are kept as pet animals. They often harbor zoonotic pathogens, which can pose a serious risk of infection for humans, mainly immunocompromised individuals, the elderly, children, and pregnant women. Several studies have been carried out to verify the role of cold-blooded animals in the epidemiology of some bacteria, mainly Salmonella, whereas scarce attention has been focused on these animals as a source of staphylococci. These bacteria are often antimicrobial-resistant and they act as opportunistic pathogens, which can cause relevant infections in humans and animals, both domestic and wild. Asymptomatic reptiles and amphibians often harbor staphylococcal strains, such as Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.; however, these bacteria have been associated with clinical conditions that usually appear in animals under stress conditions. In all cases, greater attention should also be focused on staphylococci in cold-blooded animals due to their implications in human and veterinary medicine.

Vedolizumab increases risk of serious infections

Vedolizumab increases risk of serious infections

Comparative Risk of Serious Infection With Vedolizumab vs Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results From Nationwide Swedish Registers.

We aimed to assess the risk of serious infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with vedolizumab compared with those treated with anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNF) and the general population. In this Swedish cohort study, treatment episodes were identified from nationwide health registers. We used Cox regression with propensity score-matched cohorts to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident serious infections, defined as infections requiring hospital admission. During 1,376 treatment episodes in Crohn's disease, the rate of serious infections per 100 person-years (PY) was 5.18 (95% CI = 3.98-6.63) with vedolizumab vs 3.54 (95% CI = 2.50-4.85) with anti-TNF; HR = 1.72 (95% CI = 1.12-2.65), partly explained by more gastrointestinal infections. Compared with the rate of 0.75/100 PY (95% CI = 0.59-0.92) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab demonstrated higher risk (HR = 7.00; 95% CI = 5.04-9.72). During 1,294 treatment episodes in ulcerative colitis, the corresponding rates were 3.74/100 PY (95% CI = 2.66-5.11) with vedolizumab vs 3.42/100 PY (95% CI = 2.31-4.89) with anti-TNF; HR = 0.80 (95% CI = 0.47-1.36) during the initial 1.1 years and HR = 2.03 (95% CI = 0.65-6.32) after 1.1 years (truncated due to nonproportional hazards). Pneumonia accounted for 40% of all infections among anti-TNF, whereas no case was observed among vedolizumab episodes. Compared with the rate of 0.69/100 PYs (95% CI = 0.53-0.87) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab showed an HR of 5.45 (95% CI = 3.67-8.11). Vedolizumab was associated with increased risks of serious infections compared with anti-TNF in Crohn's disease but not in ulcerative colitis. Nonetheless, the panorama of serious infections seemed to differ between the drugs. Our findings underscore the importance of clinical awareness of infections and the safety profile of the 2 therapies.

Evaluation and management of febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer.

Febrile neutropenia is a common oncologic emergency that increases the risk for serious infection. This article reviews a joint American Society of Clinical Oncology and Infectious Diseases Society of America guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with cancer who present with fever and neutropenia. Knowledge and use of available risk assessment tools may reduce unnecessary hospitalizations, decrease inappropriate antibiotic use, and improve patient outcomes.

Harnessing Immunomodulatory Polymers for Treatment of Autoimmunity, Allergy, and Transplant Rejection.

Autoimmunity, allergy, and transplant rejection are a collection of chronic diseases that are currently incurable, drastically decrease patient quality of life, and consume considerable health care resources. Underlying each of these diseases is a dysregulated immune system that results in the mounting of an inflammatory response against self or an innocuous antigen. As a consequence, afflicted patients are required to adhere to lifelong regimens of multiple immunomodulatory drugs to control disease and reclaim agency. Unfortunately, current immunomodulatory drugs are associated with a myriad of side effects and adverse events, such as increased risk of cancer and increased risk of serious infection, which negatively impacts patient adherence rates and quality of life. The field of immunoengineering is a new discipline that aims to harness endogenous biological pathways to thwart disease and minimize side effects using novel biomaterial-based strategies. We highlight and discuss polymeric micro/nanoparticles with inherent immunomodulatory properties that are currently under investigation in biomaterial-based therapies for treatment of autoimmunity, allergy, and transplant rejection.

Update on targeted treatments for ANCA-associated vasculitis

Targeted therapy has revolutionized the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) over the last fifteen years. Rituximab, an approved induction and maintenance agent for severe AAV, is no less effective than cyclophosphamide as induction therapy and particularly useful in relapsing or refractory disease, or in women. In patients with relapsing AAV, granulomatosis with polyangiitis or PR3-ANCA, it is more effective than cyclophosphamide. Rituximab maintenance is superior to the conventional immunosuppressive drugs that it replaces. Low-dose preemptive rituximab infusions are recommended every 6months for 18months, followed by re-evaluation to decide whether 4 additional biannual infusions should be administered, balancing the probability of relapse and the risk of serious infections on rituximab. A growing body of experimental and clinical data shows that C5a pathway inhibition is a promising therapeutic option for AAV, which could reduce glucocorticoids needs. Avacopan is a first approved oral C5A receptor antagonist, used when there is a high risk that glucocorticoids will cause serious adverse events. In eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, the importance of IL-5 for eosinophil activation and survival led to evaluation and approval of mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against IL-5. Mepolizumab showed a steroid-sparing effect. Its effectiveness in active vasculitis remains uncertain and is currently being evaluated. Benralizumab targeting the IL-5 receptor was recently shown to be noninferior to mepolizumab. Rituximab has had disappointing results in non-severe active vasculitis and is being evaluated as maintenance therapy. Plasma exchange is not indicated as first-line treatment but remains recommended when creatinine levels exceed 300μmol/L.

Biomarker Driven Antifungal Stewardship (BioDriveAFS) in acute leukaemia—a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to assess clinical and cost effectiveness: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundAcute leukaemias (AL) are life-threatening blood cancers that can be potentially cured with treatment involving myelosuppressive, multiagent, intensive chemotherapy (IC). However, such treatment is associated with a risk of serious infection, in particular invasive fungal infection (IFI) associated with prolonged neutropenia. Current practice guidelines recommend primary antifungal (AF) prophylaxis to be administered to high-risk patients to reduce IFI incidence. AFs are also used empirically to manage prolonged neutropenic fever. Current strategies lead to substantial overuse of AFs. Galactomannan (GM) and β-D-glucan (BG) biomarkers are also used to diagnose IFI. Combining both biomarkers may enhance the predictability of IFI compared to administering each test alone. Currently, no large-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) has directly compared a biomarker-based diagnostic screening strategy without AF prophylaxis to AF prophylaxis (without systematic biomarker testing).MethodsBioDriveAFS is a multicentre, parallel, two-arm RCT of 404 participants from UK NHS Haematology departments. Participants will be allocated on a 1:1 basis to receive either a biomarker-based antifungal stewardship (AFS) strategy, or a prophylactic AF strategy, which includes existing standard of care (SoC).The co-primary outcomes will be AF exposure in the 12-month post randomisation and the patient-reported EQ-5D-5L measured at 12-month post randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include total AF exposure, probable/proven IFI, survival (all-cause mortality and IFI mortality), IFI treatment outcome, AF-associated adverse effects/events/complications, resource use, episodes of neutropenic fever requiring hospital admission or outpatient management, AF resistance in fungi (non-invasive and invasive) and a Desirability of Outcome Ranking.The trial will have an internal pilot phase during the first 9 months. A mixed methods process evaluation will be integrated in parallel to the internal pilot phase and full trial, aiming to robustly assess how the intervention is delivered. Cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed.DiscussionThe BioDriveAFS trial aims to further the knowledge of strategies that will safely optimise AF use through comparison of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a biomarker-led diagnostic strategy versus prophylactic AF to prevent and manage IFI within acute leukaemia. The evidence generated from the study will help inform global clinical practice and approaches within antifungal stewardship.Trial registrationISRCTN11633399. Registered 24/06/2022.

Incidence of serious infections in the working-age Japanese adult population with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and interleukin-6 inhibitors: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFαi) and interleukin-6 inhibitors (IL-6i), with no prior use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). We employed the nationwide insurance claims database encompassing the years 2005 to 2018 in Japan. The inclusion criteria specified patients who were prescribed any type of bDMARDs, including TNFαi and IL-6i. The following exclusion criteria were applied: missing prescription dates, RA not diagnosed, below 16 years of age, bDMARDs prescribed within 6 months of registration, RA diagnosed post-bDMARDs prescription, and incidence of serious infections within 2 weeks before bDMARDs therapy. We applied stabilized inverse probability weights and utilized a Cox regression model to estimate the risk of serious infections associated with TNFαi and IL-6i. The cohort of 2493 patients with RA was categorized into a TNFαi group and an IL-6i group of 2018 and 475 participants, respectively. The median follow-up duration (interquartile range) was 347 (147-820) days in the TNFαi group and 369 (149-838) days in the IL-6i group. In the inverse probability-weighted cohort, the incidence rates (95% confidence interval) of serious infections were 2.13 (1.65-2.71) and 3.25 (2.15-4.69) per 100 person-years for the TNFαi and IL-6i groups, respectively. The hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) comparing the TNFαi group to the IL-6i group was 0.66 (0.36-1.20, p = 0.168). The results underscore the lack of evidence to preferentially favor either TNFαi or IL-6i as later-line therapy in the management of bDMARDs-naive RA to mitigate the risk of serious infections.

Differences in risk of serious infections between patients with secondary versus primary nephropathy following rituximab treatment: a retrospective cohort study.

The incidence of severe infections (SIs) in patients with autoimmune nephropathy after rituximab (RTX) treatment varies significantly. Our study aims to identify high-risk populations, specifically by comparing the differences in the risk of SIs between patients with primary nephropathy and those with nephropathy in the context of systemic autoimmune diseases (referred to as secondary nephropathy). This retrospective cohort study investigated the occurrence of SIs in adult patients with immune-related kidney disease who received RTX treatment at our institution from 2017 to 2022. Multivariable COX regression models were used to analyze the association between the type of nephropathy (primary or secondary) and SIs. Propensity score analyses, subgroup analyses, and E-value calculations were performed to ensure the reliability of the results. Out of 123 patients, 32 (26%) developed 39 cases of SIs during a mean follow-up period of 19.7 ± 14.6 months post-RTX treatment, resulting in an incidence rate of 18.9/100 patient-years. The multivariable COX regression analysis indicated that patients with secondary nephropathy had a significantly higher risk of SIs compared to those with primary nephropathy (HR = 5.86, 95% CI: 1.05-32.63, P = 0.044), even after accounting for confounding variables including gender, age, BMI, history of prior SIs, baseline eGFR, lymphocyte counts, IgG levels, and the utilization of other immunosuppressive therapies. Various sensitivity analyses consistently supported these findings, with an E-value of 5.99. Furthermore, advanced age (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06; P = 0.023), low baseline IgG levels (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.64-0.89; P < 0.001), and recent history of SIs (HR: 5.68; 95% CI: 2.2-14.66; P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors. The incidence of SIs following RTX administration in patients with autoimmune nephropathy is significant. It is crucial to note that there are distinct differences between the subgroups of primary and secondary nephropathy. Patients with secondary nephropathy, particularly those who are elderly, have low baseline IgG levels, and have a recent history of SI, are more susceptible to SIs.

Long-term surveillance study of rituximab originator treated patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA)or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA).

Rituximab is used for remission induction and the prevention of relapse in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). This study evaluated the incidence of safety events and compared time to first serious adverse event (SAE) between a rituximab cohort and a cohort treated with non-rituximab therapies in a real-life setting. Rituximab surveillance study in vasculitis was a retrospective observational study of patients with AAV who received rituximab (MabThera) or other treatments between 2003 and 2017 at a specialist vasculitis clinic. The primary endpoint was time to first SAE. 392 patients were enrolled: 247 in the rituximab and 145 in the control cohorts with a total follow up of 2217 person-years (mean study duration 5.7 years). Mean age was 61 years, 77% had granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). There were differences in baseline characteristics (disease duration and prior immunosuppressive use) between groups. 134/247 patients (54%) in the rituximab and 58/145 (40%) of controls experienced at least one SAE. Time to first SAE was shorter in the rituximab group (hazard ratio (HR) 1.55, 95% CI 1.07-2.26, P = 0.022). Predictors of first SAE were higher vasculitis damage index and the presence of chronic pulmonary or kidney disease. The risk of serious infection was higher in the rituximab group (relative risk (RR) 2.12, 95% CI 1.31-3.43). Over 40% of patients with AAV experienced at least one SAE. Although shorter time to first SAE and higher risk of infection were observed in the rituximab group, baseline imbalances necessitate a careful interpretation of these results.

Preferences among patients with triple-class exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the era of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed T-cell–engaging therapies.

e23309 Background: BCMA-directed T-cell–engaging therapies have been introduced into clinical practice for the treatment of TCE RRMM. While efficacious, such treatments are associated with safety considerations such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and serious infections. These treatments also vary in reported efficacy, administration processes, and hospitalization requirements. The aim of this study is to quantify patient preferences and tradeoffs regarding these attributes. Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was designed to elicit preference weights corresponding to seven attributes related to efficacy (objective response rate [ORR], overall survival [OS]), safety (all-grade CRS, all-grade ICANS, serious infections) and treatment procedures (treatment administration, hospitalization requirements). Attribute levels were based on plausible ranges of potential values. Patients in the United States (US) with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of TCE RRMM were recruited. Pre-test interviews with patients were conducted and the final survey deployed online in 2023. A random-parameters logit model was used to estimate preference weights. Conditional relative importance (CRI) was calculated to rank the relative importance of each attribute. The minimum acceptable benefit (MAB) and maximum acceptable risk (MAR) were calculated to estimate the tradeoffs between efficacy and safety attributes. Results: The sample included 200 respondents (mean [standard deviation] age: 61 [6.4] years; 43% female; 46% White; 10% African American). A total of 197 participants reported having responded to prior treatment, of whom 195 had relapsed or become refractory. In the DCE, a 24-month increase in OS was found to be the most important attribute, with a CRI of 32.0%. Next most important were avoiding a 60% risk of serious infection (CRI 17.3%), avoiding 14-day hospitalization requirements (CRI 15.0%), and a 38% increase in ORR (CRI 13.7%). A treatment that could be started immediately and administered weekly or up to every 4 weeks was preferred over a CAR T-like procedure with a waiting period. Fewer initial hospitalization days was significantly preferred over more hospitalization days. The MABs for OS when the risk of serious infection was increased from 20% to 60%, CRS from 40% to 95%, and ICANS from 3% to 20% were 24.2, 17.1, and 18.0 months, respectively. When OS was increased from 12 to 36 months, the estimated MARs for serious infections, CRS, and ICANS were &gt; 60%, &gt; 95%, and &gt; 20%, respectively. Conclusions: This study highlights US patient preferences regarding treatment attributes for TCE RRMM. Treatment benefits and risks and the mutual tradeoffs considered by patients should be evaluated when developing and selecting therapeutic approaches.