Risk Of Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality Research Articles

Elective Pelvic Lymph Node Radiation Therapy and the Risk of Death in Patients With Unfavorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Postrandomization Analysis.

Although a contemporary randomized clinical trial has led to the use of whole-pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT), long-term data evaluating a potential reduction in mortality are lacking and are addressed in the current study. From 2005 to 2015, 350 men with localized, unfavorable-risk prostate cancer (PC) were randomly assigned to receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and RT plus docetaxel versus ADT and RT. Treatment of the pelvic lymph nodes was at the discretion of the treating physician. Multivariable Cox and Fine and Grays regression analyses were performed to assess whether a significant association existed between radiation treatment volume and all-cause mortality (ACM) and PC-specific mortality (PCSM), respectively, adjusting for known PC prognostic factors and comorbidity. An interaction term between age (categorized by dichotomization at 65 years to enable clinical interpretation and applicability of the results and which approximates the median (66 years [IQR, 61-70]) and radiation treatment volume was included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 10.20 years (IQR, 7.96-11.41), 89 men died (25.43%); of these, 42 died of PC (47.19%). Of the 350 randomly assigned patients, 88 (25.14%) received WPRT. In men younger than 65 years, WPRT was associated with a significantly lower ACM risk (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11 to 0.97]; P = .04) and lower PCSM risk (AHR, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.02 to 1.35]; P = .09) after adjusting for covariates, whereas this was not the case for men 65 years or older. WPRT has the potential to reduce mortality in younger men with unfavorable-risk PC.

The effect of human leukocyte antigen genotype on survival in advanced prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy: the KYUCOG-1401-A study.

Immune editing, in which human leukocyte antigens (HLA) have critical roles, has been suggested to shape the landscape of human cancer. This study prospectively investigated whether HLA gene zygosity is associated with the prognosis of primary androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer. KYUCOG-1401-A was conducted in conjunction with a prospective clinical trial (KYUCOG-1401). Among the patients enrolled in KYUCOG-1401 and treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy, only Japanese patients were included. HLA genotypes of HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1, and DPB1 were determined. The effect of divergence of HLA genotypes on time to progression, prostate cancer-specific survival, and overall survival was evaluated. Among 127 patients, homozygosity for HLA-DRB1 (HR, 95% CI; 4.05, 1.54-10.7, P = 0.0047) and HLA-DQB1 (HR, 95% CI; 3.75, 1.47-9.58, P = 0.0058) was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality. Patients with higher HLA evolutionary divergence scores at HLA-DQB1 (HR, 95% CI; 0.90, 0.82-0.97, P = 0.0093) had lower risks of prostate cancer-specific mortality. Androgen-responsive gene sets were upregulated in CD4low and CD8low tumors in the prostate cancer cohort, but not in the bladder and kidney cancer cohorts. This study suggested that the diversity of HLA-II loci including HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 plays an important role in advanced prostate cancer survival, contributing to improved risk stratification in advanced prostate cancer. Moreover, it was shown that CD4+ T cells play an important role in androgen deprivation therapy, suggesting that immunotherapy targeting CD4+ T cells is promising for prostate cancer.

Mortality Risk for Docetaxel-Treated, High-Grade Prostate Cancer With Low PSA Levels

Patients with high-grade prostate cancer with low levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA; <4 ng/mL) are at high risk of mortality, necessitating an improved treatment paradigm. To assess for these patients whether adding docetaxel to standard of care (SOC) treatment is associated with decreased prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM). PubMed search from 2000 to 2022. Five prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) performed in the US, France, and the United Kingdom evaluating SOC treatment with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or with radical prostatectomy vs SOC plus docetaxel. Individual data were included from patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer, a PSA level of less than 4 ng/mL, and a Gleason score of 8 to 10. Patients initiated treatment between February 21, 2006, and December 31, 2015 (median follow-up, 7.1 [IQR, 5.4-9.9] years). Data were analyzed on December 16, 2022. Hazard ratio (HR) of ACM and subdistribution HR (sHR) of PCSM adjusted for performance status (1 vs 0 or good health), Gleason score (9 or 10 vs 8), tumor category (T3-T4 vs T1-T2 or TX), and duration of ADT (2 years vs 4-6 months). From a cohort of 2184 patients, 145 patients (6.6%) in 4 RCTs were eligible (median age, 63 [IQR, 46-67] years). Thirty-one patients died, and of these deaths, 22 were due to prostate cancer. Performance status was 0 for 139 patients (95.9%) and 1 for 6 patients (4.1%). A reduced but nonsignificant risk of ACM (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.24-1.09]) and PCSM (sHR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.17-1.02]) was associated with patients randomized to SOC plus docetaxel compared with SOC. The risk reduction in ACM (HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.21-1.02]) was more pronounced among patients with a performance status of 0 and was significant for PCSM (sHR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.11-0.86]). Adding docetaxel to SOC treatment for patients who are in otherwise good health with a PSA level of less than 4 ng/mL and a Gleason score of 8 to 10 was associated with a significant reduction in PCSM and therefore has the potential to improve prognosis.

Biochemical Recurrence and Risk of Mortality Following Radiotherapy or Radical Prostatectomy

Stratifying patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatment for prostate cancer based on the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) is essential for determining the need for further testing and treatments. To evaluate the association of BCR after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy and its current risk stratification with PCSM. This population-based cohort study included a total of 16 311 male patients with 10 364 (64%) undergoing radical prostatectomy and 5947 (36%) undergoing radiotherapy with curative intent (cT1-3, cM0) and PSA follow-up in Stockholm, Sweden, between 2003 and 2019. Follow-up for all patients was until death, emigration, or end of the study (ie, December 31, 2018). Data were analyzed between September 2022 and March 2023. Primary outcomes of the study were the cumulative incidence of BCR and PCSM. Patients with BCR were stratified in low- and high-risk according to European Association of Urology (EAU) criteria. Radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. A total of 16 311 patients were included. Median (IQR) age was 64 (59-68) years in the radical prostatectomy cohort (10 364 patients) and 69 (64-73) years in the radiotherapy cohort (5947 patients). Median (IQR) follow-up for survivors was 88 (55-138) months and 89 (53-134) months, respectively. Following radical prostatectomy, the 15-year cumulative incidences of BCR were 16% (95% CI, 15%-18%) for the 4024 patients in the low D'Amico risk group, 30% (95% CI, 27%-32%) for the 5239 patients in the intermediate D'Amico risk group, and 46% (95% CI, 42%-51%) for 1101 patients in the high D'Amico risk group. Following radiotherapy, the 15-year cumulative incidences of BCR were 18% (95% CI, 15%-21%) for the 1230 patients in the low-risk group, 24% (95% CI, 21%-26%) for the 2355 patients in the intermediate-risk group, and 36% (95% CI, 33%-39%) for the 2362 patients in the high-risk group. The 10-year cumulative incidences of PCSM after radical prostatectomy were 4% (95% CI, 2%-6%) for the 1101 patients who developed low-risk EAU-BCR and 9% (95% CI, 5%-13%) for 649 patients who developed high-risk EAU-BCR. After radiotherapy, the 10-year PCSM cumulative incidences were 24% (95% CI, 19%-29%) for the 591 patients in the low-risk EAU-BCR category and 46% (95% CI, 40%-51%) for the 600 patients in the high-risk EAU-BCR category. These findings suggest the validity of EAU-BCR stratification system. However, while the risk of dying from prostate cancer in low-risk EAU-BCR after radical prostatectomy was very low, patients who developed low-risk EAU-BCR after radiotherapy had a nonnegligible risk of prostate cancer mortality. Improving risk stratification of patients with BCR is pivotal to guide salvage treatment decisions, reduce overtreatment, and limit the number of staging tests in the event of PSA elevations after primary treatment.

Are associations between obesity and prostate cancer outcomes following radical prostatectomy the same in smokers and non-smokers? Results from the SEARCH Cohort.

Obesity and smoking have been associated with poor prostate cancer (PC) outcomes. We investigated associations between obesity and biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastasis, castrate resistant-PC (CRPC), PC-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality (ACM) and examined if smoking modified these associations. We analyzed SEARCH Cohort data from men undergoing RP between 1990 and 2020. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between body mass index (BMI) as a continuous variable and weight status classifications (normal: 18.5 ≤ 25kg/m2; overweight: 25-29.9kg/m2; obese: ≥ 30kg/m2) and PC outcomes. Among 6,241 men, 1,326 (21%) were normal weight, 2,756 (44%) overweight and 2159 (35%) obese; 1,841 (30%) were never-smokers, 2,768 (44%) former and 1,632 (26%) current-smokers. Among all men, obesity was associated with non-significant increased risk of PCSM, adj-HR = 1.71; 0.98-2.98, P = 0.057, while overweight and obesity were inversely associated with ACM, adj-HR = 0.75; 0.66-0.84, P < 0.001 and adj-HR = 0.86; 0.75-0.99, P = 0.033, respectively. Other associations were null. BCR and ACM were stratified for smoking status given evidence for interactions (P = 0.048 and P = 0.054, respectively). Among current-smokers, overweight was associated with an increase in BCR (adj-HR = 1.30; 1.07-1.60, P = 0.011) and a decrease in ACM (adj-HR = 0.70; 0.58-0.84, P < 0.001). Among never-smokers, BMI (continuous) was associated with an increase in ACM (adj-HR = 1.03; 1.00-1.06, P = 0.033). While our results are consistent with obesity as a risk factor for PCSM, we present evidence of effect modification by smoking for BCR and ACM highlighting the importance of stratifying by smoking status to better understand associations with body weight.

Validation of the prognostic value of a three-gene signature and clinical parameters-based risk score in prostate cancer patients.

The study aimed to validate the prognostic value of the Prostatype® risk score (P-score), which includes a three-gene signature and conventional risk factors, in a retrospective cohort. All 716 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2008 to 2010 at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden, were included. After excluding patients based on pathological and clinical eligibility criteria, RNA quality, and presence of metastases at diagnosis, a final cohort comprising 316 patients was further analyzed. Expression levels of three genes (IGFBP3, F3, and VGLL3) were measured in archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded core needle biopsies. The gene expression data were combined with clinical parameters (Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen, and clinical tumor stage) to calculate the P-score for each patient. Predictive performance of the P-score in terms of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), distant metastasis and adverse pathological outcomes were investigated. The P-score predicted both PCSM (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.6) and metastasis (HR = 1.46). The P-score had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.93 when predicting the PCSM risk at 10 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.98), which was significantly better than both D'Amico (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72-0.90, p < 0.001) and UCSF-CAPRA (AUC: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.96, p < 0.05). Decision curve analysis showed a higher net benefit of the P-score compared to both D'Amico and CAPRA. All three risk scores performed similarly in the prediction of distant metastases. For patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), a higher P-score correlated with adverse pathological features such as pathologic tumor stage T3-4 (p < 0.0001) and ≥International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 3 (p < 0.0001). Our findings provide evidence for the prognostic value of the P-score. The P-score predicted the risk for PCSM more accurately than the D'Amico and CAPRA scores. Performance was similar when predicting the risk for development of distant metastases within 10 years. Moreover, the P-score correlated with adverse pathological outcomes in RP specimens. Thus, the P-score could provide useful information for patients and their doctors to make informed decisions at the time of diagnosis.

A modeling study to estimate prostate cancer-specific mortality on active surveillance for men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Results from the SEARCH cohort.

Limited data exist to help surgeons decide between active surveillance (AS) versus treatment for men with favorable intermediate risk (FIR) prostate cancer. To estimate the theoretical excess risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) with AS versus radical prostatectomy (RP), we determined the risk of PCSM in FIR men undergoing RP and modeled the PCSM risk for AS using a range of increased PSCM scenarios ranging from 1.25x to 2x higher relative to RP. We retrospectively reviewed data from men undergoing RP from 1988 to 2017 at 8 Veterans Affairs hospitals within the SEARCH cohort. Men with FIR PC were identified using the NCCN risk criteria. Risk of PCSM at 5, 10, and 15 years after RP was estimated. Using these estimates, PCSM was then modeled for AS using a range of increased risk of PCSM relative to RP ranging from 1.25x to 2x higher. For the 920 FIR men identified, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival estimates for PCSM after RP were 99.9%, 99.0%, and 97.8%, respectively. If the risk of PCSM on AS were 1.25-2x greater than RP, there would be 0.54%-2.17% excess risk of PCSM at 15 years. The risk of death for FIR after RP is very low. Assuming even modestly increased PCSM with AS versus RP, the excess risk of death for AS in FIR is low even up to 15 years. These data support the consideration of AS as a relatively safe alternative to RP in FIR men, though prospective randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.

MP77-03 THE EFFECT OF NEIGHBORHOOD ARCHETYPE ON PROSTATE CANCER-SPECIFIC MORTALITY FOR WISCONSIN MEN

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP77-03 THE EFFECT OF NEIGHBORHOOD ARCHETYPE ON PROSTATE CANCER-SPECIFIC MORTALITY FOR WISCONSIN MEN Ashanda R. Esdaille, Arighno Das, Glenn Allen, Daniel Shapiro, Kyle Richards, E. Jason Abel, David Jarrard, and Tudor Borza Ashanda R. EsdailleAshanda R. Esdaille More articles by this author , Arighno DasArighno Das More articles by this author , Glenn AllenGlenn Allen More articles by this author , Daniel ShapiroDaniel Shapiro More articles by this author , Kyle RichardsKyle Richards More articles by this author , E. Jason AbelE. Jason Abel More articles by this author , David JarrardDavid Jarrard More articles by this author , and Tudor BorzaTudor Borza More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003351.03AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Socioeconomic factors are associated with prostate cancer (PCa) disparities. This study aimed to identify the association between rurality and neighborhood deprivation on prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) for men diagnosed and treated in Wisconsin. METHODS: Wisconsin Cancer Reporting System (WCRS) data were used to identify all men diagnosed with PCa between 1995-2010. These data were merged with rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) codes to identify patients living in rural, small town, and urban areas. Deprivation was measured by the Area of Deprivation Index (ADI) at the census block group level using the Neighborhood Atlas®, a validated composite measure which allows for rankings of neighborhoods by socioeconomic disadvantage based on income, education, employment, and housing quality. ADIs were categorized into quartiles. Differences in baseline demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were determined using chi-square tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of neighborhood archetype and deprivation on PCSM, adjusted for age, clinical grade, stage, diagnosis year +/- treatment. RESULTS: 62,474 men with PCa were identified with a median follow up of 5.7 years (primary) and 9.6 years (sensitivity analyses). 41,885 men (67%) resided in urban areas, 7,102 (11%) in small towns and 13,487 (22%) in rural areas. Men living in rural areas were diagnosed at older ages and more commonly had nodal and metastatic disease (p<0.001). Among all three neighborhood archetypes, definitive treatment increased in later time periods with overall higher rates of surgery versus radiation. In small towns, radiation was more prevalent. In comparison to men living in urban areas, there was no increased risk of PCSM for men in rural or small town areas (p=0.09-0.56). Further, there was no difference in PCSM risk for advantaged men living in urban, rural or small town areas (p=0.39-0.93). Disadvantaged rural men had increased risk of PCSM compared to disadvantaged urban men (Q3: aHR=1.2 (95% CI 1.0-1.35, p=0.042). This trend was not observed in men residing in the most deprived neighborhoods (Q4: p=0.21-0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Men living in rural areas had more aggressive disease on presentation in comparison to men residing in small towns and urban areas, possibly reflecting differences in screening patterns. Overall, there was no difference in PCa-specific deaths by neighborhood archetype; however, differences in deprivation status within the archetypes underscore the association between lack of neighborhood-level resources and oncologic outcome. Source of Funding: Esdaille: AUA/UCF Research Scholar Award Grant# 017-822959 © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e1102 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ashanda R. Esdaille More articles by this author Arighno Das More articles by this author Glenn Allen More articles by this author Daniel Shapiro More articles by this author Kyle Richards More articles by this author E. Jason Abel More articles by this author David Jarrard More articles by this author Tudor Borza More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

PD21-04 THE IMPACT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEPRIVATION AND RACE ON PROSTATE CANCER-SPECIFIC MORTALITY FOR WISCONSIN MEN

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD21-04 THE IMPACT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEPRIVATION AND RACE ON PROSTATE CANCER-SPECIFIC MORTALITY FOR WISCONSIN MEN Ashanda R. Esdaille, Arighno Das, Glenn O. Allen, Daniel Shapiro, Kyle Richards, E. Jason Abel, David Jarrard, and Tudor Borza Ashanda R. EsdailleAshanda R. Esdaille More articles by this author , Arighno DasArighno Das More articles by this author , Glenn O. AllenGlenn O. Allen More articles by this author , Daniel ShapiroDaniel Shapiro More articles by this author , Kyle RichardsKyle Richards More articles by this author , E. Jason AbelE. Jason Abel More articles by this author , David JarrardDavid Jarrard More articles by this author , and Tudor BorzaTudor Borza More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003287.04AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Neighborhood deprivation contributes to worsened prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes. In Wisconsin, 54% of the population resides in the most deprived neighborhoods and the state ranks #1 in PCa incidence for Black men. In this study, we aimed to identify the association between neighborhood deprivation, race, and PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) for Wisconsin men. METHODS: Wisconsin Cancer Reporting System (WCRS) data were used to identify all men diagnosed with PCa between 1995-2010. Deprivation was measured by the Area of Deprivation Index (ADI) at the census block group level using the Neighborhood Atlas®, a validated composite measure which allows for rankings of neighborhoods by socioeconomic disadvantage based on income, education, employment, and housing quality. ADIs were categorized into quartiles. Differences in baseline demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were determined using chi-square tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of neighborhood deprivation and race on PCSM, adjusted for age, clinical grade, stage, diagnosis year +/- treatment. RESULTS: 62,474 men with PCa were identified including 58,777 White, 2,706 Black, and 991 Other with a median follow up of 5.7 years (primary) and 9.6 years (sensitivity analyses). 33,558 men resided in the most deprived neighborhoods (Q3-Q4): 30,678 White vs 2,282 Black vs 591 Other. PCa-specific deaths were more prevalent in Q4 (12.5%) vs Q1 (9.6%), p<0.001. Men living in the most deprived neighborhoods had a slightly higher risk for PCSM (Q4: [aHR]=1.1 [95% CI 1.0-1.15], p=0.037). Deprived Black men were at a higher risk of PCSM vs deprived (Q4: HR=1.2 [95%CI 1.06-1.38], p=0.005) and least deprived White men (HR=1.3 [95% CI 1.15-1.52], p<0.001), but these were not statistically significant on adjusted and sensitivity analyses (p=0.13-0.88). The least deprived Black men (Q1: aHR=1.1 [95% CI 0.57-2.05], p=0.79) were no more likely to die from PCa than the least deprived White men. CONCLUSIONS: Race is implicated in worsened PCa outcomes, however, these findings support the association between neighborhood deprivation and PCSM as a potential mediator for race effects. These data support that neighborhood-level resources or interventions, such as access to care, are essential to improve or equalize PCa outcomes. Source of Funding: AUA/UCF Research Scholar Award Grant# 017-822959 © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e591 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ashanda R. Esdaille More articles by this author Arighno Das More articles by this author Glenn O. Allen More articles by this author Daniel Shapiro More articles by this author Kyle Richards More articles by this author E. Jason Abel More articles by this author David Jarrard More articles by this author Tudor Borza More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Prostate cancer disparities among American Indians and Alaskan Natives in the United States.

Americans Indians and Alaska Natives face disparities in cancer care with lower rates of screening, limited treatment access, and worse survival. Prostate cancer treatment access and patterns of care remain unknown. We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to compare incidence, primary treatment, and cancer-specific mortality across American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian and Pacific Islander, Black, and White patients. Baseline characteristics included prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score (GS), tumor stage, 9-level Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment risk score, county characteristics, and health-care provider density. Primary outcomes were first definitive treatment and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). American Indian and Alaska Native patients were more frequently diagnosed with higher PSA, GS greater than or equal or 8, stage greater than or equal to cT3, high-risk disease overall (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment risk score ≥ 6), and metastases at diagnosis than any other group. Adjusting for age, PSA, GS, and clinical stage, American Indian or Alaska Native patients with localized prostate cancer were more likely to undergo external beam radiation than radical prostatectomy and had the highest rates of no documented treatment. Five-year PCSM was higher among American Indian and Alaska Natives than any other racial group. However, after multivariable adjustment accounting for clinical and pathologic factors, county-level demographics, and provider density, American Indian and Alaska Native patient PCSM hazards were no different than those of White patients. American Indian or Alaska Native patients have more advanced prostate cancer, lower rates of definitive treatment, higher mortality, and reside in areas of less specialty care. Disparities in access appear to account for excess risks of PCSM. Focused health policy interventions are needed to address these disparities.

Statin Use and Survival Among Men Receiving Androgen-Ablative Therapies for Advanced Prostate Cancer

Epidemiological evidence supports a role for statins in improving survival in advanced prostate cancer, particularly among men receiving androgen-ablative therapies. To study the association between statin use and survival among men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or androgen receptor axis-targeted therapies (ARATs). This systemic review and meta-analysis used sources from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Epub Ahead of Print, Cochrane Clinical Trials, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science from inception to September 6, 2022. Observational studies reporting associations of concurrent statin use and survival outcomes (in hazard ratios [HRs]). Two authors independently abstracted all data. Summary estimates pooled multivariable HRs with 95% CIs using the generic inverse variance method with random-effects modeling. A priori specified subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken, and heterogeneity, study quality, and publication bias were evaluated. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Overall mortality and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Twenty-five cohorts of 119 878 men (65 488 statin users [55%]) with more than 74 416 deaths were included. Concurrent statin use was associated with a 27% reduction in the risk of overall mortality (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.82]; I2 = 83%) and a 35% reduction in the risk of PCSM (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.58-0.73]; I2 = 74%), with substantial heterogeneity in both estimates. Subgroup analyses identified a PCSM advantage associated with statins for men receiving ARATs compared with ADT alone (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.30-0.55] vs 0.68 [95% CI, 0.60-0.76]; P = .002 for difference). Confidence in the evidence was rated low for both outcomes. The findings of this meta-analysis show that concurrent statin use was associated with reduced overall mortality and PCSM among men receiving androgen-ablative therapies for advanced prostate cancer. These findings are limited by the observational nature of the data and residual unexplained interstudy heterogeneity. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to validate these results.

Statin Use Is Associated with Better Prognosis of Patients with Prostate Cancer after Definite Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Although the prognostic effect of statins on patients with prostate cancer (PCa) has been frequently evaluated, a consistent result is still lacking. We aimed to evaluate the association between statin use and mortality among patients with PCa after definite therapies. A systematic search of PubMed and other databases for cohort studies about the effect of statins on patients with PCa was performed until April 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using R software version 4.1.2. 24 cohort studies involving 369, 206 participants were finally included. We found statin use significantly reduced the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) with a pooled hazard ratio (pHR) = 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84, 18 studies), especially for postdiagnostic statin users: pHR = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85) and patients who accepted androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): pHR = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.59-0.81). Statin use was also associated with a 24% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM): pHR = 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.85, 17 studies), especially for postdiagnostic statin users: pHR = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85) and patients treated with ADT: pHR = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.82) or radiotherapy (RT): pHR = 0.68 (95% CI: 0.50-0.93). In conclusion, the use of statins could promote the prognosis of patients with PCa, especially for postdiagnostic users. For patients who received either ADT or radical prostatectomy (RP), statin use could decrease the PCSM. As for those who received either ADT or RT, statin use could decrease the ACM.

Metabolomic profile of prostate cancer-specific survival among 1812 Finnish men

BackgroundAbnormal metabolism and perturbations in metabolic pathways play significant roles in the development and progression of prostate cancer; however, comprehensive metabolomic analyses of human data are lacking and needed to elucidate the interrelationships.MethodsWe examined the serum metabolome in relation to prostate cancer survival in a cohort of 1812 cases in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study. Using an ultrahigh-performance LC-MS/MS platform, we identified 961 known metabolites in prospectively collected serum. Median survival time from diagnosis to prostate cancer-specific death (N=472) was 6.6 years (interquartile range=2.9–11.1 years). Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of the associations between the serum metabolites (in quartiles) and prostate cancer death, adjusted for age at baseline and diagnosis, disease stage, and Gleason sum. In order to calculate risk scores, we first randomly divided the metabolomic data into a discovery set (70%) and validated in a replication set (30%).ResultsOverall, 49 metabolites were associated with prostate cancer survival after Bonferroni correction. Notably, higher levels of the phospholipid choline, amino acid glutamate, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (n6) arachidonate (20:4n6), and glutamyl amino acids gamma-glutamylglutamate, gamma-glutamylglycine, and gamma-glutamylleucine were associated with increased risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (fourth versus first quartile HRs=2.07–2.14; P-values <5.2×10−5). By contrast, the ascorbate/aldarate metabolite oxalate, xenobiotics S-carboxymethyl-L-cysteine, fibrinogen cleavage peptides ADpSGEGDFXAEGGGVR and fibrinopeptide B (1-12) were related to reduced disease-specific mortality (fourth versus first quartile HRs=0.82–0.84; P-value <5.2×10−5). Further adjustment for years from blood collection to cancer diagnosis, body mass index, smoking intensity and duration, and serum total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol did not alter the results. Participants with a higher metabolic score based on the discovery set had an elevated risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality in the replication set (fourth versus first quartile, HR=3.9, P-value for trend<0.0001).ConclusionsThe metabolic traits identified in this study, including for choline, glutamate, arachidonate, gamma-glutamyl amino acids, fibrinopeptides, and endocannabinoid and redox pathways and their composite risk score, corroborate our previous analysis of fatal prostate cancer and provide novel insights and potential leads regarding the molecular basis of prostate cancer progression and mortality.

Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Kinetics following Radical Prostatectomy to Guide Need for Treatment Intervention: Validation of Low-Risk Recurrences.

Simple SummaryBiochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy is concerning but does not accurately predict cancer progression or death. In our patients with a biochemical recurrence, we explore whether PSA doubling time kinetics can safely guide avoidance of treatment, preventing unwanted side effects and costs. In our study, initial PSADT and subsequent DT patterns were the only predictors of no need for treatment. Gleason grade group, pathological stage, preoperative PSA, and age were not significant predictors of treatment. Approximately one-third of BCRs observed in this cohort following RP were determined to be low-risk and able to be safely followed without treatment using PSADT kinetics, with a 100% cancer-specific survival after 7.6 years of follow-up.Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) has a limited ability to predict prostate cancer (PC) progression, leading to overtreatment, decreased quality of life, and additional expenses. Previously, we established that one-third of men with BCR in our group experienced low-risk recurrences that were safely observed without treatment. Our retrospective cohort analysis of 407 BCR patients post RP validates the use of PSA doubling time (DT) kinetics to direct active observation (AO) versus treatment following RP. The primary outcome was no need for treatment according to the predictive value of models of ROC analysis. The secondary outcome was PC-specific mortality (PCSM) according to Kaplan–Meier analysis. A total of 1864 men underwent RP (June 2002–September 2019); 407 experienced BCR (PSA > 0.2 ng/dL, ×2), with a median follow-up of 7.6 years. In adjusted regression analysis, initial PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT were significant predictors for AO (p < 0.001). This model (initial PSADT and DT change) was an excellent predictor of AO in ROC analysis (AUC = 0.83). No patients with initial PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT experienced PCSM. In conclusion, the combination of PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT was an excellent predictor of AO. This is the first demonstration that one-third of BCRs are at low risk of PCSM and can be managed without treatment via DT kinetics.

A Novel Risk Score (P-score) Based on a Three-Gene Signature, for Estimating the Risk of Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality.

PurposeTo develop and validate a risk score (P-score) algorithm which includes previously described three-gene signature and clinicopathological parameters to predict the risk of death from prostate cancer (PCa) in a retrospective cohort.Patients and MethodsA total of 591 PCa patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2008 in Stockholm, Sweden, with a median clinical follow-up time of 7.6 years (1–11 years) were included in this study. Expression of a three-gene signature (IGFBP3, F3, VGLL3) was measured in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material from diagnostic core needle biopsies (CNB) of these patients. A point-based scoring system based on a Fine-Gray competing risk model was used to establish the P-score based on the three-gene signature combined with PSA value, Gleason score and tumor stage at diagnosis. The endpoint was PCa-specific mortality, while other causes of death were treated as a competing risk. Out of the 591 patients, 315 patients (estimation cohort) were selected to develop the P-score. The P-score was subsequently validated in an independent validation cohort of 276 patients.ResultsThe P-score was established ranging from the integers 0 to 15. Each one-unit increase was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.39 (95% confidence interval: 1.27–1.51, p < 0.001). The P-score was validated and performed better in predicting PCa-specific mortality than both D’Amico (0.76 vs 0.70) and NCCN (0.76 vs 0.71) by using the concordance index for competing risk. Similar improvement patterns are shown by time-dependent area under the curve. As demonstrated by cumulative incidence function, both P-score and gene signature stratified PCa patients into significantly different risk groups.ConclusionWe developed the P-score, a risk stratification system for newly diagnosed PCa patients by integrating a three-gene signature measured in CNB tissue. The P-score could provide valuable decision support to distinguish PCa patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes and hence improve treatment decisions.

Absolute Prostate Specific Antigen after 6 Months of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Is a Predictor of Overall and Cancer-Specific Mortality in Men with Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

We sought to determine if absolute prostate specific antigen (PSA) value after 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is predictive of subsequent survival in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma. We performed a retrospective review of men receiving care within the Veterans Health Administration who initiated ADT for prostate adenocarcinoma. We used low- (≤0.2 ng/ml), intermediate- (>0.2 to 4 ng/ml) and high-risk (>4 ng/ml) absolute PSA values after 6-9 months of ADT, previously described in Southwest Oncology Group trial 9346. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for each PSA category were estimated and log-rank test was conducted. We employed Cox regression analysis adjusted for covariates and inverse propensity score weights associated with PSA categories to estimate the PSA category association with PCSM and all-cause mortality. We identified 9,170 patients in our cohort. Following ADT induction, 3,508 patients had low, 3,419 had intermediate and 2,243 had high PSA values. Two- and 5-year survival rates for low, intermediate and high PSA groups were 93.9% and 85.2% vs 88.6% and 71.2% vs 63.6% and 38.6%, respectively (p <0.0001). Patients in the high and intermediate PSA categories had a 15-fold and 3-fold higher risk of PCSM compared to those with PSA <0.2 ng/ml (p <0.0001). Absolute PSA in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer after 6-9 months of ADT is a predictor of overall mortality and PCSM. This measure can rapidly assess the efficacy of new interventions in phase 2 clinical trials.

Neighborhood deprivation and risk of mortality among men with prostate cancer: Findings from a long-term follow-up study.

BackgroundThe overall survival rate of prostate cancer (PCa) has improved over the past decades. However, huge socioeconomic and racial disparities in overall and prostate cancer‐specific mortality exist. The neighborhood‐level factors including socioeconomic disadvantage and lack of access to care may contribute to disparities in cancer mortality. This study examines the impact of neighborhood deprivation on mortality among PCa survivors.MethodsNorth Carolina–Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (PCaP) data were used. A total of 2113 men, 1046 AA and 1067 EA, with PCa were included in the analysis. Neighborhood deprivation was measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) at the census block group level using data from the US Census Bureau. Quintiles of ADI were created. Cox proportional hazards and competing risk models with mixed effects were performed to estimate the effect of neighborhood deprivation on all‐cause and PCa‐specific mortality adjusted for age, race, study site, insurance status, and comorbidities.ResultsParticipants living in the most deprived neighborhoods had an increased risk for all‐cause mortality (quintiles 4 + 5: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16–1.96) compared to those in the least deprived (quintile 1) neighborhoods. The risk of prostate cancer‐specific mortality was also higher among those living in the deprived neighborhoods (quintiles 4 + 5: aHR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.10–3.50) than those in the least deprived neighborhood.ConclusionsThe findings suggest neighborhood‐level resources or health interventions are essential to improve survival among men with PCa. Additional research should focus on the mechanisms of how the neighborhood environment affects mortality.

Ambient air exposures to arsenic and cadmium and overall and prostate cancer-specific survival among prostate cancer cases in Pennsylvania, 2004 to 2014.

Exposures to arsenic (As) and cadmium (Cd) have been associated with higher prostate cancer (PC) mortality; however, these associations have been inconsistent. The authors investigated whether higher ambient air concentrations of As and Cd are associated with lower overall and PC-specific survival among PC cases in Pennsylvania. Incident PC cases of patients, aged 40 years or older, with a clinical diagnosis and nonmetastatic disease were identified in the 2004 to 2014 Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic information were extracted from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. The 3- and 5-year average and cumulative air concentrations of As and Cd were extracted from the Environmental Protection Agency's Toxics Release Inventory database. Spatial-temporal hierarchical accelerated failure time models were used to examine the associations between air concentrations of As and Cd and overall and PC-specific survival for the total population and stratified by geographical region defined by rurality and Appalachia status, after adjusting for confounders. There were 78,914 PC cases included. Increasing 3- and 5-year average and cumulative air concentrations of As and Cd were significantly associated with lower overall and PC-specific survival among cases, after adjusting for confounders, for the total population, and stratified by geographical region for most of the estimates. Data suggest that increasing ambient air exposures to As and Cd may play a role in overall and PC-specific mortality risk among PC cases. Exposures to As and Cd are modifiable and may provide insight into potential strategies to improve PC health outcomes. Arsenic and cadmium exposures linked to increased prostate cancer deaths remain unclear. We investigated whether air levels of arsenic and cadmium reported to be released from industries decrease overall and prostate cancer-specific survival among prostate cancer cases identified in the 2004 to 2014 Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. Among the 78,914 prostate cancer cases, increasing air levels of arsenic and cadmium are found to be associated with lower overall and prostate cancer-specific survival for the total population and within rural and urban Appalachia and urban non-Appalachia counties in Pennsylvania. Reducing exposures to arsenic and cadmium have the potential to decrease prostate cancer deaths.

Disease progression and competing mortality for men undergoing active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

282 Background: Active surveillance is a common management strategy for men with low-risk prostate cancer. However, there is some concern that delaying definitive therapy could lead to progressive disease and a missed opportunity to cure the cancer. We sought to study the impact of Gleason grade progression on the risk of metastases and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). We then sought to compare the risks of PCSM with the risk of competing mortality in this real-world cohort of men on active surveillance. Methods: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study using patient records from the Veterans Heath Administration Informatics and Computing Infrastructure of patients with a diagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2015, who were managed with active surveillance. Follow-up extended through March 31, 2020. Low-risk prostate cancer was defined as International Society of Urologic Pathology grade group (GG) 1, clinical tumor stage 2A or lower, PSA level of 10 ng/dL or lower. Active surveillance was defined as no definitive treatment within the first year after diagnosis with at least 1 additional re-staging biopsy after diagnostic biopsy. We identified men with pathologic upgrading to ≥GG2 and ≥GG3. We calculated the cumulative incidence of metastases, PCSM, and non-cancer mortality for men with and without pathologic upgrading. Results: The cohort included 8562 men with low-risk PC. Pathologic upgrading to ≥GG2 and ≥GG3 occurred in 3227 and 1200 men, respectively. For all patients, the 8-year cumulative incidence of metastases and PCSM was 0.8% (95% CI: 0.6-1.0%) and 0.4% (CI:0.3-0.6%), respectively. Pathologic upgrading to ≥GG2 was associated with an increased risk of metastases at 8 years (1.2% vs 0.5%, p &lt; 0.001). Pathologic upgrading to ≥GG3 was also associated with an increased risk of metastases at 8 years (2.7% vs 0.5%, p &lt; 0.001). In contrast, pathologic upgrading to ≥GG2 was not associated with an increased risk of PCSM at 8 years (0.5% vs 0.4%, p = 0.793). Similarly, pathologic upgrading to ≥GG3 was not associated with an increased risk of PCSM at 8 years (0.7% vs 0.4%, p = 0.82). The 8-year cumulative incidence of non-cancer mortality for all patients was 6.5% (95% CI:5.9-7.1%). Overall, the risk of non-cancer mortality was 16.25 (6.5/0.4) times higher than the risk of PCSM, regardless of upgrading status. Conclusions: For men with low-risk PC on active surveillance, pathologic upgrading was associated with a small increased risk of metastases but no increased risk of death from prostate cancer. Regardless of upgrading status, the risk of non-cancer mortality was substantially higher than the risk of PCSM. Future work is required to better tailor the intensity of follow up for surveillance protocols for men at risk of competing mortality.

Statin use and survival in men receiving androgen-ablative therapies for advanced prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

83 Background: Mounting evidence support a role for statins in improving survival in advanced prostate cancer (PC), particularly among men on androgen-ablative therapies. This study aimed to systemically review and meta-analyze the relationship between statin use and survival among men with PC on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapies (ARATs). Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and reported in compliance with the MOOSE guidelines. Medline, Embase, Epub Ahead of Print, Cochrane CT, Cochrane SR, and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 18, 2021, for observational studies reporting associations of postdiagnostic statin use and survival outcomes (hazard ratios [HRs]). Two authors independently abstracted all data. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The primary outcomes included overall mortality (OM) and Prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Summary estimates pooled multivariable HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the generic inverse variance method with random-effects modelling. Heterogeneity was assessed and quantified. A priori subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken, and publication bias was evaluated. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: Twenty-five cohorts of 119,878 men (64,717 statin users [54%]) with over 74,416 mortality events were included. Postdiagnostic statin use was associated with a 27% reduction in the risk of OM (19 cohorts, HR 0.73 [95%CI: 0.66 to 0.82], I2= 83%) and a 35% reduction in the risk of PCSM (14 cohorts, HR 0.65 [95%CI: 0.58 to 0.73], I2= 74%), with significant heterogeneity in both estimates. Subgroup analyses identified a PCSM-advantage of statins for men on ARATs compared to ADT (HR 0.40 [95%CI: 0.30 to 0.55] vs HR 0.68 [95%CI: 0.60 to 0.76], p-difference &lt; 0.01). Confidence in the overall evidence was “low” for both outcomes. Conclusions: Postdiagnostic statin use reduced both overall and prostate cancer-specific mortality in men on androgen-ablative therapies for advanced PC. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.