Risk Of Postoperative Wound Infection Research Articles

Effectiveness of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine in General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Appendectomy

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> Appendicitis is an inflammation of vermiform appendix organ. It is a medical emergency case and one of the most common acute abdominal cases. The removal of acute appendix with minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic procedure, is associated with shortened recovery time and length of stay in hospital, reduced risk of postoperative wound infections, also improved cosmetic outcomes. Anesthesia procedure for laparoscopic in Indonesia is usually performed under general anesthesia (GA) which has effective and safe form of sedation. One local anesthesia agent that often used in laparoscopic procedure is bupivacaine. Studies have shown that intraperitoneal bupivacaine as analgesia after laparoscopy can reduce postoperative pain, such as visceral pain associated with tissue injury and the stretching of nerve endings in the peritoneal cavity, parietal pain related to the incisional trauma at the port sites, and shoulder pain referred by stretching of the diaphragm.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>Mr. TA, 27 years old, his lower right abdomen hurt and he was diagnosed with acute appendicitis ASA II. Patients performed with laparoscopic procedure under general anesthesia. Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, and sevoflurane 1 MAC, 50% FiO<sub>2</sub> : 50% water, 4 lpm flow were administered. After 90 minutes of surgery, 40 cc of 0.5% intraperitoneal bupivacaine was administered. Patient was assessed for the NRS score within 30 minutes after laparoscopic procedure. The NRS score was 0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> It has been reported a patient underwent laparoscopic appendicitis procedure received intraperitoneal bupivacaine as a postoperative analgesia which provided quicker recovery and good improvement of pain control without any significant negative consequences.</p>

Managing incisional wounds with Prevena VAC therapy in lower-extremity vascular surgery: A comparative study.

Vascular surgical site infections have been reported with an overall incidence of 5-10% for patients undergoing arterial interventions and as high as 10-20% for lower-limb bypass grafting procedures. Given that vascular surgery patients are known to be at a higher risk of postoperative wound infections and other complications, our objective was to evaluate a potential method to reduce such complications. This study compares the rate of wound healing complications between incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and conventional dressings in vascular surgery patients with infra-inguinal incisions. The primary endpoint is complete closure of the wound at the 2-week follow-up appointment. Secondary endpoints include frequency infections requiring antibiotics, need for wound revision, and wound dehiscence. A prospective cohort study with retrospective control group was performed following infra-inguinal vascular surgeries for peripheral arterial disease at the Mount Carmel Health System. The patients included in this study were those who underwent a lower-extremity vascular procedure with primary closure of an incision distal to the groin between January 2014 and July 2018. Patients that had received an infra-inguinal incision with primary closure were included. Patients in the experimental group who had a Prevena Wound VAC were compared with a retrospectively obtained control arm treated with conventional dressings. Data regarding wound healing and complications, specifically infections and wound dehiscence, were obtained. A total of 201 patients were recruited in our study: 64 in the Prevena group and 137 in the control group. There was a significant reduction in the number of open wounds in the Prevena group compared to the control group at the 2-week follow-up (10.9% Prevena vs 33.6% control; p = .0005). When evaluated in aggregate, there was a statistically significant reduction in the number of patients who succumbed to any complication in the Prevena arm compared with traditional dressings (13 (20.3%) Prevena vs 72 (52.6%) control; p < .0001). The results of our study suggest there should be a significant consideration for the use of NPWT as a prophylactic measure to reduce the risk of wound complications of primarily closed infra-inguinal incisions in vascular surgery patients following common vascular procedures. Its use is particularly effective for patients at enhanced risk of infection, especially those with poor vascularization from BMI, smoking, and diabetes. This leads to decreased trends in antibiotic use, ED visits, readmissions, and surgical revisions, which translates to decreased utilization of hospital resources and economic burden.

Effect of platelet-rich plasma on healing of lower extremity diabetic skin ulcers: A meta-analysis.

The aim of this research is to explore the therapeutic efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the cutaneous ulceration of diabetes mellitus (DM). From the beginning of the database until January 2024, we looked through several databases to obtain randomised, controlled PRP studies to treat the wound healing of DM in adult patients. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk-Of-Bias Instrument was used to evaluate the risk of bias in randomised, controlled studies. Funnel plots, sensitivity analyses and Egger regression tests were employed to determine the reliability and effectiveness of the meta-analyses. Depending on the degree of heterogeneity, a fixed or random effect model has been used. The statistical significance was determined to be below 0.05. Altogether 281 trials were collected from the database and entered into Endnote Software for screening, and 15 trials were analysed. It was found that PRP was associated with a higher rate of wound healing (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.42, 4.31 p < 0.0001). PRP was associated with a reduction in the risk of post-operative wound infection (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21, 0.99 p = 0.05). PRP was associated with a reduction in the risk of amputations amongst those with DM (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30, 0.84 p = 0.009). Overall, PRP treatment for DM is expected to improve the rate of wound healing, decrease the risk of wound infection and decrease the risk of amputations.

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the setting of cochlear implantation: a retrospective analysis of 700 cases.

Postoperative wound infections after cochlear implantation are rare but sometimes serious and can lead to explantation. Therefore, perioperative antibiotic administration is often recommended. However, in clinical practice, the type and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis varies between different centers. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing postoperative complications. 700 patients who underwent cochlear implantation between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated with regard to wound infections within the first 28 postoperative days. These were classified into major and minor complications. Data were analyzed using the IBM statistical program SPSS. In 670 out of 700 patients the type and duration of perioperative antibiotic administration could be reconstructed from the records. Of these 67 patients (10%) received antibiotics as a single shot, 158 patients (23.6%) were treated with antibiotics for a period of 48h, and 445 patients (66.4%) received prolonged antibiotic therapy for more than 72h. In total 64 patients (9.5%) showed abnormalities in wound assessment within the first 28 postoperative days after implantation. Major infections (1.6%) were detected in 11 patients. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in wound infection rates between the group receiving single-shot antibiosis and the group receiving 48h prophylaxis or antibiotic treatment > 72h (p = 0.46). Patients receiving an antibiotic single shot do not appear to be at significantly increased risk for postoperative wound infections compared with patients with prolonged antibiotic treatment. Continuation of data collection across centers seems reasonable.

Effect of two different modalities of hysterectomy on wound infection and wound dehiscence in obese patients.

This research intended to investigate the influence of the operation of both kinds of hysterectomies in the risk of wound infection and the degree of wound dehiscence. Both of them were open field and laparoscope. In this research, we looked into four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library. Research was conducted on various operative methods for hysterectomy in obese patients between 2000 and October 2023. Two independent investigators performed an independent review of the data, established the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and managed the results with Endnote software. It also evaluated the quality of the included literature. Finally, the data were analysed with RevMan 5.3. This study involved 874 cases, 387 cases received laparoscopy and 487 cases received open access operation. Our findings indicate that there is a significant reduction in the rate of post-operative wound infection among those who have received laparoscopy compared with who have received open surgical procedures (odds ratio [OR], 0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.15; p < 0.001); There was no statistical difference between the rate of post-operative wound dehiscence and those who received laparotomy compared with those who received open surgical procedures (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.10-1.11; p = 0.07); The estimated amount of blood lost during the operation was less in the laparoscopy group compared with the open procedure (mean difference, -123.72; 95% CI, -215.16 to -32.28; p = 0.008). Generally speaking, the application of laparoscopy to overweight women who have had a hysterectomy results in a reduction in the expected amount of bleeding during surgery and a reduction in the risk of post-operative wound infections.

Effect of two different techniques of arteriovenous fistula puncture on wound infection in haemodialysis patients.

Safe and effective arteriovenous fistula (AVF) puncture is very important to reduce the wound complications of haemodialysis (HD). For AVF puncture in dialysis patients, there is a lack of clarity and consistency regarding the relative advantage of buttonhole (BH) over rope-ladder (RL) cannulae in terms of wound complications. The study was published in several scientific databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed and Embase by October 2023. Data from all controlled trials looking at the effect of BH and RL on wound complications in haemodialysis patients were included. The articles were written in English, and they were about adult who had AVF while on dialysis. Studies with or without BH or RL treatment were excluded from the analysis. The data was analysed with RevMan5.3 software. Out of 215 trials, 9 were chosen for the final analysis. The study publication dates were between 2000 and 2023. Of these, 17 326 patients received AVF therapy. Among them, there were 3070 BH and 14 256 RL. In 9 studies, RL had a lower risk of postoperative wound infection compared to BH (OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 3.06, 3.73 p < 0.0001); In all 3 studies, there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of post operative bleeding in RL versus BH(OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.25, 2.33 p = 0.63). Our studies have demonstrated that RL trocars are superior to BH trocars in the prevention of wound infection.

Effect of general and spinal anaesthesia on post-operative wound healing during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis.

Totally extraperitoneal prosthetic (TEP) is a surgical technique for the treatment of hernia. The purpose of this research is to compare the efficacy of both general anaesthesia and spine anaesthesia for TEP herniorrhaphy. The number of patients who received TEP operations related to the injury from 2008 to 2022 was counted in this study. Patients with TEP operation were classified into general anaesthesia and spine anaesthesia. In this research, 186 related articles were found in the data base, and in the end, 8 were analysed. This study involved 2452 cases of hernia. The data of the operation time, the infection of the wound and the bleeding of the wound were analysed. The analysis of the data was done with RevMan 5.3. Results indicated that there was no significant difference between general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia in post-surgical rates for post-operative wound infection (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.83; p = 0.86); In general anaesthesia, there was no difference in the risk of post-operative wound haematoma when compared with those treated with spinal anaesthesia (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 0.37-23.69; p = 0.31). In the seven trials, there was no difference in the duration of the surgery between the general anaesthetic and the spinal anaesthesia group (mean difference, -1.44; 95% CI, -4.11 to 1.22; p = 0.29). Data from the available meta-analysis indicate that there is no difference in the risk of post-operative wound infection or wound haematoma when treated with TEP.

Effect of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy on postoperative wound complications in patients with pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis.

At present, it is regarded as a safe and efficient operation to treat terminal pancreatic disease. In this paper, we present a summary of the results of the clinical trials that have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic and open-access pancreatic resection for pancreatic carcinoma of the end of the pancreas. Systematic review of the comparison between laparoscopy and open-access pancreatic resection was conducted. Comparative studies published before October 2023 were included. The selection of the studies was done according to a particular classification and exclusion criterion. A few of our results, which were post-surgery, were associated with injury, were compared. Where appropriate, the reliability of the data has been corroborated by a sensitive analysis. Six trials of 2075 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent distal pancreatic resection to be included in the definitive data analysis. Among them, 447 were treated with open-access surgery and 296 were treated with laparoscope. Six trials showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of postoperative wound infection in patients with pancreas cancer who received a distal pancreatectomy between laparoscopy and open surgery(OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.76-3.61 p = 0.20). Four trials did not reveal any statistically significant differences in the risk of postoperative haemorrhage among patients with pancreas cancer who received a distal pancreatectomy between laparoscopy and open surgery (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.54-6.26 p = 0.33). Both trials did not reveal any statistically significant difference in the duration of operation for patients with pancreas cancer who received a distal pancreatectomy between laparoscopy and open surgery (MD, 13.58; 95% CI, -7.31-34.46 p = 0.2). Based on these meta-analyses, the use of laparoscopy or open surgery was not associated with an increase in the risk of postoperative infection or haemorrhage. Furthermore, the duration of the two operations did not differ significantly. These two procedures appear to be a safe and viable choice in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma. Nevertheless, a randomized, controlled study should be performed to verify the validity of this observation.

Comparison of the risk of postoperative wound infection in patients with rectal cancer by laparoscopic versus open Hartmann's surgery

AbstractTraditional Hartmann surgery is used when the patient is in an acute case where it might not be safe to carry out a one‐stage intestinal anastomosis. Laparoscopy has been extensively applied in the treatment of large intestine, which can significantly improve both short‐ and long‐term outcomes. While randomized, controlled studies and reviews have shown that laparoscopy is superior to that of open‐access colectomy, the impact of Hartmann's surgery on postoperative site infections has not been studied. The purpose of this study is to summarize the existing evidence to show that laparoscopy is better than open operation in the area of injury. Methods The Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Libraries were searched from the moment the database was created until November 2023. For binary results, the odds ratio was estimated, and a weighted average of consecutive results was calculated. Our findings indicate that there is a lower risk for SSIs after laparoscopic approach surgery than an open‐access procedure (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10, 0.69, p = 0.006); Laparoscopy was associated with a reduction in the risk of dying after surgery (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30, 0.84, p = 0.009); The operation time was not significantly different in open and laparoscope (MD, 12.23; 95% CI, −5.63, 30.09, p = 0.18); laparoscopy was used to lower the incidence of SSI after surgery and to lower the mortality rate after surgery than by open‐access surgery. However, the time of operation did not differ significantly among the two methods. However, further controlled trials will need to be carried out to verify the results.

Effect of body mass index on the wound infection and complications in patients with liver cancer: A meta‐analysis

AbstractThis study systematically evaluates the effect of body mass index on the occurrence of wound infections and complications in patients undergoing liver cancer surgery through a meta‐analysis. A computerized search was conducted, from database inception to October 2023, in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases for studies related to the impact of body mass index on patients undergoing liver cancer surgery. Two researchers independently selected studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality. Data analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. A total of 8 studies, encompassing 21 030 liver cancer surgery patients, were included. The analysis revealed that patients with a higher body mass index had a significantly higher incidence of wound infection (odds ratio [OR] = 2.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21–4.60, p = 0.012) and complications (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.11–2.24, p = 0.011) compared to the control group. Additionally, the hospital stay for higher body mass index patients was longer than that for the control group (standard mean difference [SMD] = −1.09, 95% CI: −4.71 to 2.53, p = 0.556), although this difference was not statistically significant. The study indicates that liver cancer surgery patients with higher body mass index were at an increased risk of postoperative wound infection and complications. This finding highlights the importance of considering body mass index as a factor in the management and care of patients undergoing liver cancer surgery.

Radiological findings associated with postoperative wound infection after extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: A retrospective study

IntroductionStudies directly relating radiological findings to the risk of postoperative wound infection (PWI) in impacted mandibular third molars (M3) are limited and poorly understood. This study aimed to clarify the radiological risk of PWI. Materials and methodsTwenty-six patients who developed PWI after M3 extraction were retrospectively analyzed using orthopantomography (OPG) and computed tomography (CT) before M3 extraction to determine the association between M3 impaction status and PWI. These were compared with an equal number of non-infected groups. Moreover, the possibility of assessing the same risk in OPG as in CT imaging was examined. ResultsMultivariate analysis identified class III and position B of the Pell and Gregory classification system as independent risk factors for PWI. On CT, an axial overlap distance (AOD) >3.5 mm was significantly associated with PWI. Furthermore, the sagittal overlap distance (SOD) and AOD of the OPG were significantly greater in group III-B. A strong positive correlation was observed between SOD and AOD. ConclusionThese results indicate that class III, position B, and an AOD >3.5 mm may be novel risk factors for M3 PWI. The strong correlation between SOD and AOD suggests that the risk assessment for PWI can be performed by evaluating OPG alone.

Wound infection prevention strategies in colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection: A meta-analysis of prophylactic measures.

Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is associated with the risk of postoperative wound infections, prompting investigations into effective prophylactic measures. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various prophylactic interventions in reducing the incidence of wound infections following EMR. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies from 2015 to 2022. We included studies that compared the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis and antiseptic measures, with clear data on post-procedure infection rates. Eight studies met our inclusion criteria, and data were extracted for meta-analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analysis included 3765 patients from eight RCTs. Prophylactic antibiotics (cefixime and cefuroxime) showed moderate to high efficacy, with infection rates as low as 0% and 0.76%. Prophylactic endoscopic closure and clipping showed the highest efficacy, with zero reported infections. The standardized surgical site infection prevention bundle had lower effectiveness, with an infection incidence of 3.83%. The risk of bias assessment indicated potential performance bias due to lack of blinding, but overall evidence quality was upheld by proper random sequence generation and diligent outcome data monitoring. The effectiveness of specific prophylactic measures, notably prophylactic antibiotics and mechanical closure techniques, has been shown in significantly reducing the risk of wound infections following colorectal EMR.

Effect of salpingectomyversus tubal ligation on postoperative wound infection in patients: A meta-analysis.

After several institutions recommended salpingectomy as opposed to tubal ligation, we attempted to perform meta-analysis to compare operative properties and rates of postoperative wound infections. There are no temporal or linguistic limitations to our search in PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase. The search was carried out in September 2023. The database search identified 401 potential studies and five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Our study involved a comparison of salpingectomy with tube ligating in female patients who wanted to be sterilized. Our trial included at least one result of the wound and haemorrhage. The articles that did not qualify for inclusion or did not submit data, and those who did not answer questions were excluded. Abstracts and full-text articles were assessed independently by two authors using blinding. Conflicting decisions were settled by consensus. The Cochrane-recommended ROBINS-I instrument has been applied to evaluate the risk of bias in clinical trials and to establish the quality of inclusion. Two authors separately evaluated the risk of bias for each trial; differences were settled by consensus. There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of postoperative wound infections among those who had received salpingectomy or tubal ligation (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.18-1.20 p = 0.11). In the three trials, the risk of bleeding following the ligation of the fallopian tubes was lower than that of the salpingectomy group (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.21-1.30 p < 0.0001). From this information we have come to the conclusion that it is possible to give preference to tubal ligation for reduction of bleeding in suitable circumstances, and that the findings currently do not provide sufficient evidence for a reduction in the risk of postoperative wound infection.

Effect of laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal hysterectomy on wound complications in patients with early stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) have been widely applied to treat cervical carcinoma. But LARVH and ARH have not been fully investigated in treating cervical carcinoma after injury associated with injury. This research is intended to provide an up-to-date basis for comparing LARVH with ARH in early stage cervical carcinoma. Comparison between LARVH and ARH in cervical carcinoma was carried out through a combination of related research. Eligible articles from databases such as PubMed and Embase were screened using an established search strategy. This report covered the results of LARVH versus ARH in cervical carcinoma. The average difference and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for the combination of consecutive variables. The combination of categorical variables was performed with the odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval. Through the identification of 1137 publications, eight of them were chosen to be analysed. Among them, 363 were treated with LARVH and 326 were treated with ARH. Eight trials showed that LARVH was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative wound infection than ARH (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.1-0.55, p = 0.0009). Five trials showed that there was no difference in the risk of postoperative bleeding after surgery (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.42-3.29, p = 0.76). We also did not differ significantly in the duration of the surgery (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, -6.58 to 10.15, p = 0.68). So, the two surgical methods differ significantly only in the risk of postoperative wound infection.

Effect of intramedullary fixation and plate fixation on postoperative wound complications in clavicle fractures: A meta-analysis.

More and more meta-analyses have been conducted to compare the effects of intramedullary fixation (IF) and plate fixation (PF) on the outcome of midshaft clavicle fractures. It can affect the doctors' treatment decisions. A number of studies have been conducted in order to assist surgeons in selecting optimal operative procedures and to recommend operative treatment of clavicle fractures in accordance with the best available research. Our analysis of the IF and PF of clavicle fractures was done through a search for PubMed, Emabase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Two different researchers analysed the research literature for quality of analysis and data extraction. The analysis of the data was done with RevMan 5.3. The 95% CI and OR models have been computed by means of either fixed-dose or randomize. In addition, RCT in 114 references have been reviewed and added for further analysis. It is concluded that the application of plate and intramedullary fixation in the middle clavicle operation has remarkable influence on the outcome of post-operation. There was a lower risk of postoperative wound infection in IF (OR, 5.92; 95% CI, 2.46, 14.27 p < 0.0001), smaller surgical incisions (MD, 6.57; 95% CI, 4.90, 8.25 p < 0.0001), and shorter operative time (MD, 17.09; 95% CI 10.42, 23.77 p < 0.0001), less blood loss (MD, 63.62; 95% CI, 55.84, 71.39 p < 0.0001) and shorter hospital stay (MD, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.84, 1.25 p < 0.0001). However, there is no statistical significance in the incidence of wound dehiscence. Thus, the effect of IF on the incidence of injury is better than that of the inner plate in the middle of the clavicle.

Comparison of Wound Infection with Absorbable Suture Versus Non-Absorbable Suture after Cesarean Section

Objective: To compare the frequency of wound infection with absorbable suture and non-absorbable suture after cesarean section. Study Design: A randomized controlled trial. Place and Duration: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nisthar Hospital, Multan from August 2021 to June 2022. Methodology: A total of 826 women (413 in each group) undergoing cesarean section were included. In Group-A absorbable suture was employed while in Group-B, non-absorbable suture was used. Post-operatively, all patients were followed up weekly and the final assessment of wound infection was done after 15 days. Results: In a total of 826 cases, mean age was 26.47±3.42 years. Mean body mass index was 25.62±1.87 kg/m2 and obesity was present in 166 (20.1%). Of these 826 study cases, emergency cesarean section was performed in 593 (71.8%). Mean duration of procedure was 38.43±12.21 minutes and 562 (68.0%) had duration of procedure below 40 minutes. Overall, wound infection was noted in 145 (17.6%) women, In Group-A, wound infection was noted in 96 (23.2%) women and in Group-B it was in 49 (11.9%) (p&lt;0.0001). Practical Implications: Clinicians can employ non-absorbable sutures to decrease the risk of post-operative wound infection after cesarean section. Conclusion: We found non-absorbable sutures after cesarean section to yield significantly less rates of wound infection when compared to absorbable sutures. Keywords: Absorbable suture, Non-absorbable suture, wound infection, cesarean section.

Effect of Supplemental Oxygen on Risk of Surgical Wound Infection

Background: There is a risk of different complication after the surgery but delaying in wound healing or infection is one of most common risk. Oxidative killing is a process of tissues partial pressure of oxygen throughout the observed values ranges. The main defense against foreign particles in result of surgery is oxidative killing through neutrophils. In a study by Greif et al4 indicated oxygen 80% during the surgery and after 2 hours later of surgery 50% risk get lesser as compared to the patient who had administrated with 30% oxygen.4 Another study proved that chances of risk for infection get increase in patients who were administrated oxygen 11 % as compared to the patients with 25% oxygen administration.5 The current study was conducted to test the hypothesis that supplemental oxygen decreases the risk of post-operative wound infection. Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the effects of supplemental oxygen on risk of surgical wound infection. Materials and Methodology: A randomized Clinical Trial- double- blinded was conducted at DHQ hospital, Karachi from March 1, 2011 to October, 31, 2016. A total of 300 subjects with age around 18 to 80 years who underwent elective colorectal surgery and satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited in the study. Non-probability Purposive sampling technique was used to collect the data. Double-blinded technique was used. Blinded investigators diagnosed the wounds infection by following the criteria of centers of disease control and prevention. Patients were randomly allocated in two groups by sealed-envelope method. Baseline assessment was performed on each patient which included patient’s medical history, physical examination and Lab tests i.e. complete blood picture and biochemical analysis. Characteristics for patient’s baseline and aesthetic treatment were confound factors. 3rd generation antibiotics cephalosporin were administrated 1 to 2 hours before of surgery. Patients of Group 1 received oxygen fraction of inspired oxygen FIO2 of 30 and group 2 of 80 percent. Randomly chosen concentration flow of oxygen 16l/min was given. Patient was breathing ambient air. Supplemental oxygen was given to maintain the patient’s oxygen saturation to 92% that is measured by pulse oximetry. Patient’s treatment was slandered with antibiotics and anesthesia administration. For wound evaluation, tools used were National nosocomial infection surveillance scale 6 and Efficacy of infection control,7 Wounds were checked for infection on daily basis by surgeons who were blinded. And wound thought to be infected when they full fill the criteria of Centers for Disease control and prevention standard. Main outcome measure was surgical site for infection and secondary outcomes were recovery of bowl function, duration of hospital stay, ambulation and ability to absorb the solid food. Statistical Analysis: Analysis was done on SPSS by applying parametric and non-parametric test according to normality. Results: Results showed no significant difference in %age Surgical infection site, Daily ASEPSIS value ≥20 at any time (p-value&lt;0.06), Admission in ICU (p-value= 0.74), Bowel function recovery (p-value=0.74), Solid food intake (p-value=0.54), Walking (p-value=0.57), Removal of Staples( 0.72), Duration of post-surgery hospitalization(p-value=0.09) of both the groups as p-value &gt;0.05 of all variables. Practical implication: If we provide pre-operative supplemental oxygen it will be helpful to decrease SSI. Conclusion: Patients who received supplemental oxygen showed significantly decrease in the risk of wound infection. Hence, Pre-operative supplemental oxygen proved to be an effective intervention to decrease SSI in the patients having rectal or colon surgery. Keywords: ASEPSIS, Surgical Wound, Infection, Supplemental Oxygen

Obesity Does Not Significantly Impact Operative and Long-Term Outcomes After Pulmonary Thromboendarerectomy

<h3>Purpose</h3> Although obesity is a common comorbidity among patients undergoing Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy (PTE) for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH), the exact impact of this risk factor on operative and hemodynamic outcomes remains poorly described. Objectives are to assess the effects of BMI on operative mortality and major morbidity, survival, and post-discharge hemodynamic parameters after PTE. <h3>Methods</h3> From 2013 to 2021, 223 patients underwent PTE at a single referral institution. Median age was 51±15 years and mean BMI was 33.6±8.8kg/m². Diagnosis of CTEPH was confirmed on pulmonary artery catheterization with mean PA pressure 45.4±12.2mmHg. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, stroke, respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy and renal failure requiring dialysis. Secondary outcomes included late changes to hemodynamic parameters and sternal wound infection. <h3>Results</h3> In-hospital mortality was 6.3% (N=14), while 1.3% of patients (N=3) suffered stroke, 5.4% (N=12) required dialysis and 9.0% (N=20) required tracheostomy. Post-operative mean PA pressure was 30.4±9.6 mmHg just prior to discontinuation of invasive monitoring. Of the 106 patients with post-discharge echocardiogram, 12% had moderate-severe RV dysfunction, decreased from 53% pre-operatively (p=0.0004). Eighteen (8.1%) patients required reintervention for post-operative sternal infection, with 7 deep and 11 superficial infections. Of these, 12 required debridement and 6 required tissue flap. In a univariate logistic regression, BMI was not a significant predictor of the composite outcome (OR 1.00, CI 0.96-1.04), but was correlated with increased risk of wound infection (OR 1.06, CI 1.01-1.11). Changes to in-hospital PA pressures and post-discharge RV function were not correlated with BMI (p=0.97, p=0.96, respectively). In a Cox proportional hazards model, BMI was not associated with impaired long-term survival after PTE (HR 1.01, CI 0.96-1.06). <h3>Conclusion</h3> This study shows that PTE can be a safe and effective treatment for CTEPH in the obese population, although it does carry increased risk of post-operative wound infection. PTE has the potential to yield excellent hemodynamic results in all patients, regardless of BMI; and therefore, it should continue to represent the standard of care for obese patients with CTEPH.

The safety and efficacy of dexamethasone in the perioperative management of glioma patients.

In this single-institution retrospective cohort study, the authors evaluated the effect of dexamethasone on postoperative complications and overall survival in patients with glioma undergoing resection. A total of 435 patients who underwent resection of a primary glioma were included in this retrospective cohort study. The inclusion criterion was all patients who underwent resection of a primary glioma at a tertiary medical center between 2014 and 2019. The use of both pre- and postoperative dexamethasone demonstrated a trend toward the development of postoperative wound infections (3% vs 0% in single use or no use, p = 0.082). No association was detected between dexamethasone use and the development of new-onset hyperglycemia (p = 0.149). On multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, dexamethasone use was associated with a greater hazard of death (overall p = 0.017); this effect was most pronounced for preoperative (only) dexamethasone use (hazard ratio 3.0, p = 0.062). Combined pre- and postoperative dexamethasone use may increase the risk of postoperative wound infection, and dexamethasone use, specifically preoperative use, may negatively impact survival. These findings highlight the potential for serious negative consequences with dexamethasone use.

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in Australian burns patients

Background: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is perceived to reduce intraoperative bacteraemia and prevent surgical site infections, however, the evidence for its use in burns surgery is limited. Excessive use of perioperative antibiotics has become a growing concern. The authors aimed to audit the prescribing practices of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis at the Victorian Adult Burns Service and determine whether the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis influenced the risk of postoperative wound infection, bacte-raemia and antibiotic resistance. Methods: This retrospective chart review included all acute adult burns patients who had an operation between November 2018 and November 2019. Basic demographic data, burn specific data and data on perioperative antibiotic use were collected. The outcome measures were wound infection, bacteraemia, other infections and presence of resistant organisms. Results: Results demonstrated that almost all patients (98.6%) received perioperative antibiotic prophylax-is. In comparison, there was no significant difference between the rate of postoperative wound infection, bacteraemia or antibiotic resistance between patients receiving a short or long course of antibiotics. Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrate variable use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with-in one burns unit. There were many cases of unsubstantiated use of long courses of antibiotics without apparent benefit for clinical outcomes of wound infection or bacteraemia. With the growing concern over antibiotic overuse and development of resistance, there is an increasing need for development of clear guidelines for antibiotic use in burns surgery.