Risk Of Peri-implantitis Research Articles

Risk of Late Implant Loss and Peri-Implantitis Based on Dental Implant Surfaces and Abutment Types: A Nationwide Cohort Study in the Elderly.

This nationwide population-based cohort study aimed to assess the incidence of implant complication treatments, including implant removal procedures and peri-implantitis treatments, in relation to implant surfaces and abutment types. Data from the National Health Insurance Service, covering approximately 50 million individuals, were used. Implants and abutments were categorized by codes, including surfaces such as resorbable blasting media, sandblasted large grit and acid-etched (SA) and hydroxyapatite coating, along with abutment structures (one-piece straight, two-piece straight, angled). The incidence of implant complication treatments was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression (α = 0.05). The study included 2,354,706 implants. The SA group had the lowest hazard ratio for implant removal procedures (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were found in the risk of peri-implantitis treatments between implant surfaces (p = 0.0587). The risk of implant complication treatments did not differ significantly by the abutment type (p = 0.9542). The incidence rate of implant complication treatments was < 3.9 per 1000 implant-years across all groups. The SA group showed a slightly lower risk of late implant loss, whereas no significant association was found for the abutment type groups. All implant and abutment type groups showed an incidence rate of < 3.9 per 1000 implant-years for complication treatments.

Influence of gingival phenotype on crestal bone loss at implants

PurposeThe aim of this long-term cohort study in periodontally compromised patients with implants was to analyze the correlation between gingival phenotype and peri-implant crestal bone loss, and between clinical measures and gingival phenotype.MethodsImplant-supported single crowns and bridges were used to rehabilitate 162 implants in 57 patients. Patients were examined over a 2 to 20-year period on a recall schedule of 3 to 6 months. In addition to recording clinical parameters, intraoral radiographs were taken at baseline (immediately after superstructure insertion) and at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years. Patients were differentiated into phenotype 1 with thin, scalloped gingiva and narrow attached gingiva (n = 19), phenotype 2 with thick, flat gingiva and wide attached gingiva (n = 23), or phenotyp 3 with thick, scalloped gingiva and narrow attached gingiva (n = 15).ResultsThe mean peri-implant crestal bone loss during the first 12 months was 1.3 ± 0.7 mm. Patients with gingival phenotype 1 had a significantly greater rate of increased crestal bone loss at implants (p = 0.016). No significant differences were present in subsequent years. The prevalence of mucositis at all implants was 27.2%, and the prevalence of peri-implantitis 9.3%. Univariate analyses indicated a significantly higher peri-implantitis risk in patients with gingival phenotype 2 (p-OR = 0.001; p-OR = 0.020). The implants of patients with phenotype 2 had significantly greater probing depths (1st year p < 0.001; 3rd year p = 0.016; 10th year p = 0.027; 15th year p < 0.001). Patients with gingival phenotype 3 showed no significantly increased probing depths, signs of inflammation and crestal bone loss.ConclusionsPatients with a gingival phenotype 1 have greater crestal bone loss at implants during the first year of functional loading. Patients with gingival phenotype 2 had significantly greater probing depth at implants and risk of peri-implantitis.

Peri-Implantitis.

Peri-implantitis can affect the longevity of successfully integrated implants. Implant success is dependent on reducing the peri-implantitis risk or successfully managing peri-implantitis. Further understanding of peri-implantitis can be derived from its prevalence, microbial and diagnostic findings, existing therapies, and the effects of systemic health issues and medication. Based on published information: (1) peri-implantitis is higher in patients who have periodontitis or smoke as well as in implants with 5 years of function; (2) peri-implantitis microflora is different from periodontitis; (3) peri-implantitis risk is increased in patients with cardiovascular diseases and uncontrolled diabetes; (4) most reported peri-implantitis therapies may result in resolution, but the best peri-implantitis treatment is still to be determined; (5) more frequent peri-implant maintenance may reduce risk for peri-implantitis.

A prosthetic-surgical approach for aesthetic treatment of peri-implant soft tissue defects: A case report

Peri-implant soft tissue defects (PSTD) in the esthetic zone affect approximately 54% cases of post-implant insertion, leading to aesthetic concerns and increasing the risk of peri-implantitis. Various surgical techniques are aimed at addressing these issues, but the outcomes can be unpredictable, especially for severely mispositioned implants. This report details a combined prosthetic and surgical approach to treat a severely angulated single central maxillary implant with mid-labial mucosal recession. A 38-year-old female expressed dissatisfaction with the implant at 21 area, which appeared elongated due to peri-implant mucosal recession of almost 4 mm. Treatment involved two phases: 1) prosthetic phase involves replacing the original crown of implant at 21 area with a temporary crown to promote mucosal growth and 2) surgical phase that involves soft tissue surgery three months later using an envelope flap technique at the recipient site and a connective tissue graft harvested from the palate. Upon three months after the surgery, full coverage with thick mucosal tissue was achieved, and a new zirconia crown was placed. The outcome remained stable throughout the nine-month follow-up. This case demonstrates that PSTD in angulated implants in the esthetic zone can be effectively treated through a combination of prosthetic and surgical modalities.

Surgical outcome of extra sinus zygomatic implants in comparison to conventional implants for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Posterior maxillary atrophy in particular presents a challenge for implant-supported dental rehabilitation. The discovery of the zygomatic implant by Branemark and its modifications has brought a much-needed window of hope to most patients with atrophic maxilla. The conventional approach to is believed to be the intra sinus technique but the use of the extra sinus zygomatic implants has advantages like reducing surgical time, the risk of sinus adverse events and improving surgical visualization. A systematic literature search in five databases: Proquest, Google Scholar, PubMed, OVID, Cochrane and a hand search of relevant scientific journals was performed. The meta-analysis done on the included five studies, revealed that the primary outcome, i.e, implant survival rate and prosthesis failure showed no statistically significant difference between the test and the control group. The overall difference between the control (intra sinus zygomatic implants) and test group (extra sinus zygomatic implant) was statistically significant for chronic sinusitis (p=0.0002) and periimplantitis (p=0.01). The use of the extra sinus technique for the placement of zygomatic implants simplified the surgical procedure, improved the prosthetic outcome and reduced the risk of sinusitis and periimplantitis as compared to conventional or intra sinus technique of zygomatic implant placement.

Surface Topography Has Less Influence on Peri-Implantitis than Patient Factors: A Comparative Clinical Study of Two Dental Implant Systems.

This study aims to assess the risk of peri-implantitis (PI) onset among different implant systems and evaluate the severity of the disease from a population of patients treated in a university clinic. Furthermore, this study intends to thoroughly examine the surface properties of the implant systems that have been identified and investigated. Data from a total of six hundred and 14 patients were extracted from the Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo. Subject- and implant-based variables were collected, including the type of implant, date of implant installation, medical records, recall appointments up to 2022, periodontal measurements, information on diabetes, smoking status, sex, and age. The outcome of interest was the diagnosis of PI, defined as the occurrence of bleeding on probing (BoP), peri-implant probing depth (PD) ≥ 5 mm, and bone loss (BL). Data were analyzed using multivariate linear and logistic regression. Scanning electron microscopy, light laser profilometer, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were utilized for surface and chemical analyses. Among the patients evaluated, 6.8% were diagnosed with PI. A comparison was made between two different implant systems: Dentsply Sirona, OsseospeedTM and Straumann SLActive, with mean follow-up times of 3.84 years (SE: 0.15) and 3.34 years (SE: 0.15), respectively. The surfaces have different topographies and surface chemistry. However, no significant association was found between PI and implant surface/system, including no difference in the onset or severity of the disease. Nonetheless, plaque control was associated with an increased risk of developing PI, along with the gender of the patient. Furthermore, patients suffering from PI exhibited increased BL in the anterior region. No differences were observed among the evaluated implant systems, although the surfaces have different topography and chemistry. Factors that affected the risk of developing PI were plaque index and male gender. The severity of BL in patients with PI was more pronounced in the anterior region. Consequently, our findings show that success in implantology is less contingent on selecting implant systems and more on a better understanding of patient-specific risk factors, as well as on implementing biomaterials that can more effectively debride dental implants.

Indivudual and implant factors associeated with peri-implantitis: a multi-level analysis

The study aimed to carry out a multilevel analysis of the factors associated with peri-implantitis in patients who were rehabilitated with osseointegrated implants at the Dental Clinic of Universidade Paulista (UNIP). Being analyzed by means of influence on the patients' quality of life, 171 patients with 668 implants, with 5 years in function, were selected through clinical and radiographic examinations. Systemic and local factors and characteristics were evaluated to determine the health of the peri-implant tissues. Quality of life was assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile Index (OHIP-14). Multilevel logistic analysis was performed to estimate the OR of peri-implantitis at implant and patient level. The model was analyzed using the likelihood ratio test and the Wald test. Through the results, it was verified that the probing depth both at the implant and patient level and the distance from the gingival margin to the implant platform are factors risk for peri-implantitis. However, due to the low prevalence of the disease, there was no negative impact on the patients' quality of life.

An introduction to dental implants.

The use of implants to replace missing teeth is now commonplace and practised by clinicians worldwide in both general and specialist practice. There is an abundance of evidence on the general success of implant treatment. As well as reviewing the history of dental implants, this narrative review will discuss the merits and successful placement of tissue-level verses bone-level implants. Furthermore, the article will evaluate the concept and benefits of platform switching for implant treatment. Finally, with the increased placement of implants, this narrative paper will review how different titanium surfaces impact on the risk of peri-implantitis.

Artificial intelligence applications in dental implantology: A narrative review

Artificial intelligence (AI) has a substantial impact on various domains of society, including its significant role in revolutionizing dental care. These technological innovations have transformed dental treatment, expediting efficiency and innovation in the field. This review focuses on the substantial advancements in AI-based research in dental implantology, exploring the various applications of AI to enhance dental implant care. Comprehensive data from databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, was thoroughly scrutinized and presented. AI has significantly impacted healthcare and dental implantology by enhancing efficiency, diagnosis, and clinical decision-making. In dental implantology, AI plays a crucial role in several aspects, such as implant identification, implant planning, prediction, and peri-implantitis management. AI models, including machine learning and deep learning, have been applied to identify implant brands accurately, outperforming dental professionals in some cases. Implant planning has been streamlined using AI to evaluate bone dimensions and locate critical anatomical landmarks. Using patient data and radiographic features, AI-driven prediction models proved as powerful tools for predicting implant success and peri-implantitis risk. Additionally, AI helps in the early recognition of complications like fractured implants and bio-tribocorrosion.

Peri-implantitis in patients without regular supportive therapy: Prevalence and risk indicators

ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence of peri-implant diseases in patients treated in a university setting without a regular peri-implant supportive therapy schedule, and to identify the risk indicators associated with peri-implantitis.Material and methodsA retrospective cohort study was made of patients with dental implants with at least 12 months of functional loading who did not receive regular peri-implant supportive therapy. Patient- and implant-related variables were retrieved, and clinical and radiological examinations were performed. Descriptive and bivariate analyses and multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with peri-implantitis.ResultsA total of 213 implants in 88 patients were analyzed. The patient-level prevalence of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis was 26.1% (95%CI: 16.7%—35.5%) and 44.3% (95%CI: 34.0%—54.6%), respectively. Peri-implant diseases were significantly more frequent when the width of the keratinized mucosa was < 2 mm (OR = 5.26; 95%CI: 1.24—22.26; p = 0.024), and when there was 12 month post-loading bone loss (OR = 2.96; 95%CI: 1.35—6.52; p = 0.007).ConclusionsPeri-implantitis is a common finding in patients without regular peri-implant supportive therapy (prevalence 16.7–35.5%). A thin peri-implant keratinized mucosa (< 2 mm) and a higher degree of bone remodeling after loading seem to be the main risk factors for peri-implantitis in this patient profile.Clinical relevancePatients who do not engage in supportive peri-implant maintenance have a higher risk of peri-implantitis. A thin keratinized mucosa and bone loss during the first year of loading are predisposing factors for peri-implantitis.

Apatite-Forming Ability and Visible Light-Enhanced Antibacterial Activity of CuO-Supported TiO2 Formed on Titanium by Chemical and Thermal Treatments.

Titanium with apatite-forming ability as well as antibacterial activity is useful as a component of antibacterial dental implants. When Ti was subjected to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), copper acetate (Cu(OAc)2), and heat (H2O2-Cu(OAc)2-heat) treatments, a network structure of anatase and rutile titanium dioxide (TiO2) and fine copper oxide (CuO) particles was formed on the Ti surface. The resulting samples accumulated a dense and uniform apatite layer on the surface when incubated in simulated body fluid and showed enhanced antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus under visible-light irradiation. Electron spin resonance spectra of H2O2-Cu(OAc)2-heat-treated samples showed that hydroxyl radicals (·OH) were generated from the samples, and the concentration of ·OH increased with increasing Cu concentration of the Cu(OAc)2 solution. The enhanced antibacterial activity of these samples under visible-light irradiation may be attributable to the generation of ·OH from samples. These results suggest that Ti implants obtained using H2O2-Cu(OAc)2-heat treatments and subjected to regular or on-demand visible-light irradiation may provide a decreased risk of peri-implantitis.

Involvement of interlukin-17A (IL-17A) gene polymorphism and interlukin-23 (IL-23) level in the development of peri-implantitis

BackgroundDental implantation has been practiced since ancient times and has gone through several stages. Dentists use dental implants to support dental prostheses such as crowns, bridges, dentures, face prostheses, or as an orthodontic anchor. Thus, the purpose of this study is to detect the role of the immune-genetic variation of IL-17A and related inflammatory cytokine (IL-23) in the initiation and progress of peri implantitis.Material and methodsThis cross-sectional study included 80 subjects (15 peri-implantitis patients, 35 successful implants, and 30 healthy controls); their mean age was (43.91 ± 11.33) years. Blood samples and Peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) were collected from all subjects (patients with peri-implantitis, successful implants, and healthy controls) attending the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the Dental College Teaching Hospital, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq. The blood sample detects gene polymorphisms in interleukin-17A by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was carried out to estimate the Peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) levels of interleukin-23.ResultThe current study revealed an obvious significant elevation in the mean level of interleukin-23 in the peri-implantitis patient’s group more than its level in the successful implant and control groups (P < 0.05). In addition, the result showed that A/A genotype is associated significantly with peri-implantitis OR (95%confidence interval) =6.9 (1.7121 to 27.4638) folds increase risk of peri-implantitis) (p = 0.0065), while G/A genotype had OR 4.9 (0.9539–24.9394) folds increased risk of peri-implantitis, (p = 0.0572). But it was not statistically significant and G/G genotype had a one-fold increase risk of peri-implantitis.ConclusionThe increased level of inflammatory cytokine (interleukin-23) might add to the systemic inflammatory burden a predisposing factor, which may lead to impaired osseointegration and subsequent bone loss or implant failure. In addition, IL-17A gene polymorphism may play a role in peri-implant disease susceptibility, especially in persons carrying the rs2275913 A allele at a higher risk of developing peri-implantitits as compared with those carrying the G allele.

New insights on collagen structural organization and spatial distribution around dental implants: a comparison between machined and laser-treated surfaces

BackgroundOne of the main factors for the osseointegration of dental implants is the development of an adequate soft tissue barrier, mainly composed by collagen, which protects the implant from bacterial development. The structural features of the peri-implant collagen are influenced by the implant components and, in particular, by the type of the surface. In the clinical practice, healing abutments are characterized by smooth surfaces, named machined. Recently, a new laser technique, Synthegra, has been developed to obtain a topography-controlled surface with micrometric regular pores that seems reducing the risk of peri-implantitis. Based on this background, this study aims investigating the structural organization and spatial distribution of collagen surrounding healing abutments characterized by laser-treated and machined surfaces.MethodsGingiva portions surrounding custom-made healing abutments (HA), characterized by alternated laser-treated and machined surfaces, were collected and analyzed by combining Fourier Transform InfraRed Imaging (FTIRI) spectroscopy, a non-invasive and high-resolution bidimensional analytical technique, with histological and multivariate analyses.ResultsMasson’s trichrome staining, specific for collagen, highlighted a massive presence of collagen in all the analyzed samples, evidencing a surface-related spatial distribution. The nature of collagen, investigated by the FTIRI spectroscopy, appeared more abundant close to the laser-treated surface, with a perpendicular disposition of the bundles respect to the HA; conversely, a parallel distribution was observed around the machined surface. A different secondary structure was also found, with a higher amount of triple helices and a lower quantity of random coils in collagen close to the laser treated surfaces.ConclusionsFTIRI spectroscopy demonstrates that the use of a laser treated transmucosal surface can improve the morphological organization of the peri-implant collagen, which presents a distribution more similar to that of natural teeth.Trial registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: (Registration Number: NCT05754970). Registered 06/03/2023, retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05754970.

Association between prosthesis contour and peri-implantitis in patients compliant with supportive periodontal therapy: A retrospective cohort study.

Poor contour of the implant restoration causes plaque accumulation and increases the risk of peri-implantitis. This study aimed to investigate whether the prosthodontic components of dental implants were associated with the prevalence of peri-implantitis. We enrolled 185 patients with 348 implants who underwent at least 1-year follow-up after the delivery of the prosthesis from February 2010 to January 2021. Demographic data of the patients and implants and the follow-up period were recorded. The emergence angle, type of cervical crown contour, and contour angle were analyzed using annual bite-wing radiographs. Peri-implantitis in this study was diagnosed if the peri-implant bone loss was greater than 2 mm between the bite-wing radiographs taken at baseline and the latest. Chi-square test, two-sample t-test, and multivariate logistic regression were used to investigate the differences and odds ratios between the peri-implantitis and non-peri-implantitis groups. The incidence of peri-implantitis was 14.9% during a follow-up period of 1509 days after the delivery of the prosthesis for at least 1-year. Based on the prevalence of non-peri-implantitis and after adjusting for confounding factors, the risk factors identified were bone types for implants (native bone vs. alveolar ridge preservation: adjusted odds ratio = 2.43, P = 0.04). Sex, arch, and guided bone regeneration vs. alveolar ridge preservation have the potential for a statistical difference. Compared with implants at alveolar ridge preservation sites, implants in the native bone were more prone to peri-implantitis. Further randomized controlled trials are required to determine these associations.

CEMENTED AND SCREW-RETAINED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED RESTORATIONS MAY HAVE A COMPARABLE RISK FOR PERI-IMPLANT MUCOSITIS AND PERI-IMPLANTITIS

Reis INRD, Fukuoka GL, Nagay BE, Pannuti CM, Spin-Neto R, Silva EVFD. Incidence of peri-implant disease associated with cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Oct 2:S0022-3913(23)00563-2. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.030. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37793953. None declared. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

The effect of three dental cement types on the corrosion of dental implant surfaces

Statement of problemOne of the main challenges facing dental implant success is peri-implantitis. Recent evidence indicates that titanium (Ti) corrosion products and undetected-residual cement are potential risk factors for peri-implantitis. The literature on the impact of various types of dental cement on Ti corrosion is very limited. PurposeThis study aimed to determine the influence of dental cement on Ti corrosion as a function of cement amount and type. Materials and methodsThirty commercially pure Ti grade 4 discs (19 × 7mm) were polished to mirror-shine (Ra ≈ 40 nm). Samples were divided into 10 groups (n = 3) as a cement type and amount function. The groups were no-cement as control, TempBond NE (TB3mm, TB5mm, and TB8mm), FujiCEM-II (FC3mm, FC5mm, and FC8mm), and Panavia-F-2.0 (PC3mm, PC5mm, and PC8mm). Tafel’s method estimated corrosion rate (icorr) and corresponding potential (Ecorr) from potentiodynamic curves. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) data was utilized to obtain Nyquist and Bode plots. An equivalent electrical circuit estimated polarization resistance (Rp) and double-layer capacitance (Cdl). Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis was conducted to analyze the electrolyte solution after corrosion. pH measurements of the electrolyte were recorded before and after corrosion tests. Finally, the corroded surface was characterized by a 3D white-light microscope and scanning electron microscope. Statistical analysis was conducted using either one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Post Hoc test or Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s test based on data distribution. ResultsBased on cement amount, FC and PC significantly increased icorr in higher amounts (FC8mm-icorr = 8.22 × 10−8A/cm2, PC8mm-icorr = 5.61 × 10−8A/cm2) compared to control (3.35 × 10−8A/cm2). In contrast, TB3mm decreased icorr significantly compared to the control. As a function of cement type, FC increased icorr the most. EIS data agrees with these observations. Finally, corroded surfaces had higher surface roughness (Ra) compared to non-corroded surfaces. ConclusionThe study indicated that cement types FC and PC led to increased Ti-corrosion as a function of a higher amount. Hence, the implant stability could be impacted by the selection, excessive cement, and a potentially increased risk of peri-implantitis.

Dose- and time-dependent association of smoking and its cessation with risk of peri-implant diseases.

A retrospective cohort study involved patients who received at least one implant-supported restoration at a university dental clinic between 2001 and 2013. Patients were randomly selected from an electronic database, and their recruitment via telephone contact spanned from February 2021 until July 2021. To investigate the association of smoking and its cessation with the risk of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis in a cohort of implant-treated patients. The study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and followed the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational research. Included were adult patients who were rehabilitated with dental implants, irrespective of the type of edentulism, superstructure, and prosthetic retention, provided that they had adequate access for peri-implant probing. Patients with incomplete records were excluded. Clinical measurements included plaque and bleeding indices, periodontal pocket depth, suppuration on probing, mucosal recession, and width of keratinized mucosa. Periapical radiographs were taken and marginal bone level (MBL) was measured using ImageJ software. The primary outcome variable was peri-implant status which was classified into: health (H), peri-implant mucositis (PM), and peri-implantitis (PI). Smoking status was categorized into: never-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers. Smoking information included: daily cigarette consumption, duration of smoking (in years), and age at initiation, and for former smokers, the duration of smoking cessation. The cohort included 117 patients (55 females and 62 males) with a mean age of 64.2 years at examination. They were rehabilitated by 450 implants, with an average of 4.6 implants per patient and a mean duration of 8 years in function. Out of the total, 39 patients were H, while 41 and 37 showed PM and PI, respectively. Periodontal and MBL measures were significantly higher in PM and PI groups compared to H group (p < 0.001). Considering tobacco use, 56 patients were never-smokers, 42 former smokers, and 19 current smokers. The average daily consumption of cigarettes was 15.7. Ever-smokers >23 pack-years had a significantly higher risk for PI (OR = 3.40; 95% CI 0.91-17.30; p = 0.002) compared to nonsmokers. Regression analysis showed that subjects with a span since smoking cessation of more than 21 years exhibited a significantly lower risk of peri-implant diseases (PIDs) than those who had ceased smoking within 21 years (p = 0.028). A smoking intensity exceeding 23 pack-years was significantly associated with PI risk, while the risk of PIDs was comparable between never-smokers and those who had quit smoking more than 21 years ago.

A Systematic Review about the Consequences of Diabetes on Peri-Implant Therapy

Diabetes is a common chronic metabolic disease that has attracted a lot of attention in the dental community because of its possible effects on peri-implant therapy. Dental implant procedures have grown in popularity as a means of replacing lost teeth. This systematic review aims to investigate the ways in which diabetes impacts different peri-implant therapy aspects. Up until February 2023, electronic databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase were thoroughly searched. Eleven studies in total that complied with the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. These studies used both prospective and retrospective designs to investigate the impact of diabetes on implant outcomes. An overview of the impact of diabetes on the outcomes of peri-implant therapy, such as implant success, survival, and tissue health around the implants, is given in this abstract. Numerous studies repeatedly show that diabetes adversely affects these crucial facets of implant therapy. Diabetes affects soft tissue health around dental implants, lowers implant survival rates, and increases the risk of peri-implantitis.

The influence of implant position and of prosthetic characteristics on the occurrence of peri-implantitis: a retrospective study on periapical radiographs

ObjectiveThe present retrospective study aimed to investigate the influence of malposition on the occurrence of peri-implantitis.Materials and methodsThe study included clinical records of systemically healthy patients with single and partial implant-supported rehabilitations and at least 1-year post-loading follow-up. The parameters collected included implant-related factors, patient-related factors, site-related factors, and prosthesis-related factors. The radiographic measurements were taken by using a dedicated software and the diagnosis of peri-implantitis was made based on all the available clinical and radiographic data. Descriptive statistics were provided for all variables. Following an exploratory approach, an implant-level analysis of factors influencing the occurrence of peri-implantitis was done through a multilevel multivariate logistic regression (mixed).ResultsA total of 180 implants belonging to 90 subjects were randomly selected. Malposition showed no statistically significant association with the occurrence of peri-implantitis. According to the multi-level analysis, the parameters that were significantly associated with peri-implantitis included presence / history of periodontitis (OR = 5.945, 95% CI: 1.093 – 32.334, P = 0.039) and presence of an emergence profile angle ≥ 45° (OR = 9.094, 95% CI: 2.017 – 40.995, P = 0.005).ConclusionsImplant malposition, as defined following Buser’s criteria (2004), did not influence the occurrence of peri-implantitis in the selected cohort. Conversely, history of periodontitis and presence of a prosthetic emergence profile with an angle ≥ 45° were correlated to an increased risk of peri-implantitis.

Validation of a Novel Diagnostic Test for Assessing the Risk of Peri-Implantitis through the Identification of the Microorganisms Present: A Pilot Clinical Study of Periopoc

The aim of this parallel group study was to determine the clinical applicability of a newly developed bacterial test. We evaluated the ability of the test to detect five bacteria associated with peri-implantitis: Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, and Treponema denticola. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were established. Furthermore, by analyzing the pre-test and post-test probabilities, likelihood ratios were established, and a Fagan nomogram was constructed. As the standard, the clinical criteria of peri-implantitis adopted in the latest classification of peri-implant diseases of 2018 were used. The sample consisted of 13 patients clinically diagnosed with peri-implantitis (various implant brands) with at least 1 year of loading, of whom 11 were included in the study. The healthy group comprised 10 patients who received implants (Ticare inhex hybrid) at the university dental clinic and were monitored and exhibited no signs or symptoms of peri-implantitis during 1 year of loading. The results indicated that this test has high sensitivity and low specificity; therefore, positive results will be of great importance for a confirmatory diagnosis of peri-implantitis. However, the test is not suitable as a screening tool.