Risk Of Major Bleeding Events Research Articles

Clinical impact of Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding-Risk scores on clinical outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

High bleeding risk (HBR), as defined by the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria, has been recently reported to be associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events and cardiovascular events. We investigated the association between the ARC-HBR score and clinical outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We assessed 328 consecutive patients with stable CAD who underwent PCI between January 2017 and December 2020. We scored the ARC-HBR criteria by assigning 1 point to each major criterion and 0.5 points to each minor criterion. Patients were stratified into low (ARC-HBR score < 1), intermediate (1 ≤ ARC-HBR score < 2), and high (ARC-HBR score ≥ 2) bleeding-risk groups. The primary outcome measure was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. We compared the discriminative abilities of the ARC-HBR score with the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS2°P) and ARC-HBR score with Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto (CREDO-Kyoto) thrombotic risk score. The mean patient age was 70.1 ± 10.2years (males, 76.8%). During the median follow-up period of 983 (618-1338) days, 44 patients developed MACE. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that a stepwise significant increase in the cumulative incidence of MACE as the ARC-HBR score increased (log-rank p < 0.001). In the time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis for predicting MACE within 2years, the area under the curve (AUC) of the ARC-HBR score was significantly higher than that of the TRS2°P (AUC: 0.825 vs. 0.725, p value for the difference = 0.023) and similar to that of CREDO-Kyoto thrombotic risk score (AUC: 0.825 vs. 0.813, p value for the difference = 0.627). Conclusions: The ARC-HBR score adequately stratified future risk of MACE in patients with stable CAD who underwent PCI. The ARC-HBR score showed a higher discriminative ability for predicting mid-term MACE than the TRS2°P.

#280 Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants vs VKA in patients on chronic dialysis: a target trial emulation using nationwide registry data

Abstract Background and Aims The mortality and morbidity rates among patients on dialysis remain high and cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in this population. In chronic kidney disease (CKD), a major thromboembolic risk is paradoxically associated with a major haemorrhagic risk. Hence, the prescription of oral anticoagulants in CKD patients is challenging. Clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are scarce and inconclusive in patients who are receiving dialysis, for whom DOAC are not labelled in Europe. In an exhaustive French nationwide registry of patients undergoing chronic dialysis, we compared the effectiveness and safety of off-label DOAC use versus approved vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Method Data on patients on dialysis were extracted from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry and merged with data from the French national healthcare system database (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS). Patients on dialysis who had initiated treatment with an oral anticoagulant between January 1st, 2012, and December 31st, 2020, were eligible for inclusion. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding events and the primary effectiveness outcome was the occurrence of thrombotic events. Using target trial emulation design, we compared the safety and effectiveness outcomes for DOAC and VKA using propensity-score-weighted cause-specific Cox regression. Results 8 954 patients received an oral anticoagulant (483 DOAC and 8 471 VKA) for the first time after the initiation of dialysis. Over a median [interquartile range] follow-up period of 1.7 [0.8-3.2] years, 2 567 patients presented a first thromboembolic event and 1 254 patients had a bleeding event. After propensity score adjustment, the risk of a thromboembolic event was significantly lower in patients treated with a DOAC than in patients treated with a VKA (weighted hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.66 [0.46; 0.94] (Figure). A non-significant trend toward lower risk of major bleeding events was found in patients treated with a DOAC compared to patients treated with a VKA (weighted HR [95% CI]: 0.68 [0.41; 1.12]) (Figure). Sensitivity analyses showed the same trends. Conclusion The fact that patients on dialysis are excluded from large, cardiovascular-disease-focused randomized controlled trials (such as those with DOACs) significantly limits the evidence needed to make clinical decisions. Most of the retrospective cohort studies comparing these two drug classes were performed in the USA, where, in contrast to Europe, apixaban has been approved for the treatment of non-valvular fibrillation in patients on haemodialysis. Our real-world study of patients on dialysis is one of the first of its type to have assessed the effectiveness and safety of off-label DOAC prescription (relative to VKA prescription) in Europe. In a large group of dialysis patients initiating oral anticoagulation, the off-label use of DOACs was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of thromboembolic events, and a non-significant trend toward lower risk of bleeding relative to VKA use. These results are reassuring with regard to the off-label use of DOACs and might facilitate the establishment of an expert consensus and guidelines on antithrombotic therapy in patients with ESKD.

ANMCO/SIMEU consensus document on the use of reversal agents for antithrombotic therapies in patients with ongoing bleeding or at high risk of haemorrhagic events.

In recent decades, an incredible evolution in antithrombotic therapies used for treating patients with atherosclerosis, atrial fibrillation, and venous thromboembolism has been observed, leading to the availability of increasingly safe drugs. Nonetheless, bleeding complications remain a significant concern, with considerable health, social, and economic implications. To improve the acute management of patients experiencing or at risk for major bleeding events, specific reversal agents for antithrombotic drugs have been recently developed. While these agents demonstrate effectiveness in small-scale pharmacodynamic studies and clinical trials, it is imperative to balance the benefits of reversing antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy against the risk of prothrombotic effects. These risks include the potential loss of antithrombotic protection and the prothrombotic tendencies associated with bleeding, major surgery, or trauma. This joint document of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri) and the Italian Society of Emergency Medicine (Società Italiana di Medicina d'Emergenza-Urgenza) delineates the key features and efficacy of available reversal agents. It also provides practical flowcharts to guide their use in patients with active bleeding or those at elevated risk of major bleeding events.

Prophylactic-dose direct oral anticoagulants for non-hospitalised people with COVID-19: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Several reviews have been conducted on thromboprophylaxis in non-hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to investigate the impact of prophylactic-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this population. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic-dose DOACs with placebo or no treatment in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19 until September 2023. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and thromboembolic events, while major bleeding events were the primary safety outcome. We expressed continuous outcome data as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and dichotomous outcome data as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. We included six RCTs involving 4307 patients. Prophylactic-dose DOAC therapy compared with placebo or no treatment was associated with significantly decreased risks of the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and thromboembolic events (1.43% vs 2.67% (RR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.34-0.82, P = 0.004, I2 = 3%)). Major bleeding events were infrequent, and we detected no significant differences between patients assigned to prophylactic-dose DOACs vs placebo or no treatment (0.19% vs 0.05% (RR = 2.50; 95% CI = 0.49-12.87, P = 0.27, I2 = 0%)). The use of prophylactic-dose DOACs was also associated with a reduction in venous thromboembolism, with no difference in all-cause mortality, arterial thromboembolism, hospitalisations, and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding between two groups. Sensitivity analyses with the leave-one-out method for the primary efficacy and safety outcome did not change the effect estimate substantially. We found that prophylaxis-dose DOACs could significantly improve clinical outcomes and reduce venous thrombotic events without increasing the risk of major bleeding events compared with placebo or no treatment in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19. PROSPERO: CRD42023466889.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Cilostazol Prescription in Patients With Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease After Endovascular Therapy.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of cilostazol prescription in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD) after endovascular therapy (EVT). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting the outcomes of cilostazol after femoropopliteal EVT of PAD up to September 2022. Clinical outcomes of interest included primary patency, in-stent restenosis (ISR), vessel re-occlusion, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), repeat revascularization, all-cause mortality, amputation, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major adverse limb events (MALEs), and bleeding complication. A total of 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 8 observational studies containing a total of 4898 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. We found that the use of cilostazol was associated with higher primary patency after femoropopliteal artery EVT (odds ratio [OR]=1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.50-1.87, p<0.001, I2=33.2%), a lower risk of ISR (OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.29-0.63, p<0.001, I2=37.6%), repeat revascularization (OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.24-0.76, p<0.005, I2=27.4%), and vessel re-occlusion (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.38-0.93, p<0.05, I2=0%). There was an increase in freedom from TLR rate (OR=2.19, 95% CI=1.58-3.05, p<0.001, I2=0%), as well as a reduction in the occurrence of MALEs (OR=0.50, 95% CI=0.29-0.85, p<0.05, I2=0%). However, there was no significant difference in amputation, MACEs, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding complications. Subgroup analysis showed that cilostazol treatment in patients with femoropopliteal drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation remained associated with higher primary patency and a lower risk of ISR. After EVT of femoropopliteal artery lesions, additional oral cilostazol enhances primary patency, reduces the occurrences of ISR and vessel re-occlusion, diminishes the risks associated with MALEs, lowers the need for repeat revascularization, and increases freedom from TLR rates. However, it does not impact amputation, MACEs, all-cause mortality, or major bleeding complications. These findings suggest cilostazol as a potentially safe and effective adjunct therapy in patients with femoropopliteal PAD after EVT. After undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal artery lesions, the addition of cilostazol to antiplatelet therapy can significantly improve primary patency, reducing the incidence of in-stent restenosis, repeat revascularization, vessel re-occlusion, and major adverse limb events while increasing freedom from target lesion revascularization rate. The simultaneous use of drug-eluting stents in the femoropopliteal artery lesions, combined with cilostazol, potentially results in a synergistic anti-stenotic effect. This therapeutic approach does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events or all-cause mortality. These findings provide additional evidence supporting the treatment of anti-stenosis in patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions after EVT.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban in Patients With Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Control Trials and Observational Studies.

The objective of this network meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban in patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease. A comprehensive search was conducted across various electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, from inception to February 15, 2024. The search strategy utilized a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) terms and relevant keywords related to valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation, anticoagulant therapy, and study design, such as randomized controlled trials and observational studies. The outcomes evaluated in this analysis comprised the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism (SE), as well as the occurrences of major bleeding events. A total of 10 studies were incorporated into this meta-analysis, encompassing 40,662 participants. Of these, 12,385 received apixaban, 2,829 received dabigatran, 13,662 received rivaroxaban, 2,582 received edoxaban, and 9,202 received warfarin. The duration of follow-up in the included studies ranged from 3 to 54 months. Among the four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) studied, apixaban demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of stroke or SE when compared to other DOACs and warfarin, highlighting its efficacy in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease. Additionally, apixaban exhibited a lower risk of major bleeding events, further emphasizing its favorable safety profile compared to the other agents assessed. In conclusion, our findings suggest that apixaban may be more effective and safer than other DOACs and warfarin in this patient population. However, additional studies are warranted to compare the various DOACs in this cohort to identify the optimal treatment strategy for preventing adverse outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of oral factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin-K antagonists in the early phase after acute ischemic stroke or TIA in the real-world setting: The PRODAST study.

Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors are superior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in terms of avoiding hemorrhagic complications. However, no robust data are available to date as to whether this also applies to the early phase after stroke. In this prospective registry study, we aimed to investigate whether anticoagulation with FXa inhibitors in the early phase after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding events compared with VKAs. The Prospective Record of the Use of Dabigatran in Patients with Acute Stroke or TIA (PRODAST) study is a prospective, multicenter, observational, post-authorization safety study at 86 German stroke units between July 2015 and November 2020. Primary outcome was a major bleeding event during hospital stay. Secondary endpoints were recurrent strokes, recurrent ischemic strokes, TIA, systemic/pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, death and the composite endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, life-threatening bleeding and death. In total, 10,039 patients have been recruited. 5,874 patients were treated with FXa inhibitors and 1,050 patients received VKAs and were eligible for this analysis. Overall, event rates were low. We observed 49 major bleeding complications during 33,297 treatment days with FXa-inhibitors (rate of 14.7 cases per 10,000 treatment days) and 16 cases during 7,714 treatment days with VKAs (rate of 20.7 events per 10,000 treatment days), translating into an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.70 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.37-1.32) in favor of FXa inhibitors. Hazards for ischemic endpoints (63 vs 17 strokes, aHR: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.53-1.74), mortality (33 vs 6 deaths, aHR: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.33-2.34)) and the combined endpoint (154 vs 39 events, aHR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.65-1.41) were not substantially different. This large real-world study shows that FXa inhibitors appear to be similarly effective in terms of bleeding events and ischemic endpoints compared to VKAs in the early post-stroke phase of hospitalization. However, the results need to be interpreted with caution due to the low precision of the estimates.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants and Vitamin K Agonists in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The objective of the study is mentioned, but it could be further clarified by explicitly stating the aim to compare the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) specifically in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).We conducted a thorough electronic search of the literature, encompassing databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from their inception up to March 5, 2024. Furthermore, we meticulously examined the bibliographies of included studies to identify additional relevant literature. The reporting of this meta-analysis adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-analysisguidelines. The endpoints evaluated in this meta-analysis included all-cause mortality, stroke or systemic embolism, and major bleeding. Data analysis was carried out utilizing RevMan Version 5.4 (Cochrane, London, United Kingdom). Dichotomous outcomes, including all-cause mortality, stroke or systemic embolism, and major bleeding, were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 11 studies were incorporated in this meta-analysis, comprising a pooled sample size of 44,863 participants with AF. The pooled analysis revealed no significant disparity between DOACs and VKAs concerning stroke or systemic embolism (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.14) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.00). However, there was a noteworthy reduction in the risk of major bleeding events associated with DOACs compared to VKAs (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.96). Consequently, DOACs may be considered a viable alternative to warfarin in patients with ESRD. However, we need further larger clinical trials to validate these findings.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used as an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for thromboprophylaxis after cancer surgery for venous thromboembolic events (VTE) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWH in these patients. A search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science was carried out and included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that directly compared DOACs with LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in patients after cancer surgery through July 25, 2023. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were VTE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) within 30days of surgery. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023445386). We retrieved 5149articles, selected 27 for eligibility, and included 10 studies (three RCTs and seven observational studies) encompassing 3054 patients who underwent postoperative thromboprophylaxis with DOACs (41%) or LMWH (59%). Compared to LMWH thromboprophylaxis, DOACs had a comparable risk of VTE (RR:0.69[95% CI:0.46-1.02], I2 = 0%), major bleeding (RR:1.55 [95% CI:0.82-2.93], I2 = 2%), and CRNMB (RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.4-1.98], I2 = 31%) during the 30-day postoperative period. Subgroup analysis of VTE and major bleeding suggested no differences according to study type, extended thromboprophylaxis, tumor types, or different types of DOAC. DOACs are potentially effective alternatives to LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing cancer surgery, without increasing the risk of major bleeding events.

Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients on chronic dialysis: a nationwide registry study.

Clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are scarce and inconclusive in patients who are receiving dialysis, for whom DOAC are not labelled in Europe. In a French nationwide registry study of patients on chronic dialysis, we compared the effectiveness and safety of off-label DOAC use vs. approved vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Data on patients on dialysis were extracted from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry and merged with data from the French national healthcare system database (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS). Patients on dialysis who had initiated treatment with an oral anticoagulant between January 1st, 2012, and December 31st, 2020, were eligible for inclusion. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding events and the primary effectiveness outcome was the occurrence of thrombotic events. Using propensity-score-weighted cause-specific Cox regression, we compared the safety and effectiveness outcomes for DOAC and VKA. 8,954 patients received an oral anticoagulant (483 DOAC and 8,471 VKA) for the first time after the initiation of dialysis. Over a median [interquartile range] follow-up period of 1.7 [0.8-3.2] years, 2,567 patients presented a first thromboembolic event and 1,254 patients had a bleeding event. After propensity score adjustment, the risk of a thromboembolic event was significantly lower in patients treated with a DOAC than in patients treated with a VKA (weighted hazard ratio (wHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.66 [0.46; 0.94]. A non-significant trend toward a lower risk of major bleeding events was found in DOAC-treated patients, relative to VKA-treated patients (wHR [95%CI]: 0.68 [0.41; 1.12]). The results were consistent across subgroups and in sensitivity analyses. In a large group of dialysis patients initiating an oral anticoagulant, the off-label use of DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of thromboembolic events and a non-significantly lower risk of bleeding, relative to VKA use. This provides reassurance regarding the off-label use of DOACs in people on dialysis.

Abstract 117: Bleeding Risks for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients on Serotonergic Antidepressants and Anticoagulation/Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy

Background: Selective serotonin/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRI/SNRIs) are associated with improved stroke recovery. Some clinicians withhold SSRI/SNRIs over bleeding risk concerns. Our objectives were: 1) Quantify the association between early initiation of SSRI/SNRIs and adverse bleeding events among acute ischemic stroke (IS) patients, 2) Determine bleeding risks among patients receiving anticoagulation (AC) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and 3) Evaluate bleeding risks between anti-depressant (AD) classes. Methods: Medication naïve first-time IS patients were identified from Electronic Medical Records of 70 healthcare organizations (2003-2023). Patients without ADs were considered “No AD”. Patients started on ADs within 3 months of the indexed stroke were classified as "SSRI/SNRI" or "Other AD" (i.e., Mirtazapine, bupropion, trazodone, or tricyclic ADs). The primary outcome was 1-year risk of major bleeding events (e.g., gastrointestinal/intracranial or shock). Secondary outcomes were hemorrhagic stroke (HS), fall and death. Baseline differences were adjusted for using 1:1 matched propensity scores. Results: A total of n=666,150 patients were included [No AD (n=607,278), SSRI/SNRI (n=35,631), Other AD (n=23,241)]. Early use of SSRI/SNRIs (vs. No ADs) was not associated with an increased risk of a major bleed for all patients (n=35,557 matched pairs) or among patients on AC (n=7,672 matched pairs). However, concurrent use of SSRI/SNRIs and DAPT was associated with a 29% increased risk of HS (RR:1.29, 95% CI: 1.11-1.50, n=8,381 matched pairs). Among patients on ADs, bleed risks were higher for use of “Other ADs” vs. "SSRI/SNRIs" (n=21,810 matched pairs). Discussion: SSRI/SNRIs treat post-stroke depression, promote functional recovery and are generally safe to start during the early stages of recovery for patients with IS. However, an increased risk of HS should be considered when starting ADs among patients on DAPT.

ANMCO/SIMEU Consensus document on the use of reversal agents of antithrombotic therapies in patients with active bleeding or at high-risk of major bleeding events

In recent decades, an incredible evolution in antithrombotic therapies for the treatment of patients suffering from atherosclerosis, atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism occurred, leading to the availability of increasingly safe drugs. However, bleeding complications associated with these drugs still have an important health, social and economic impact. Recently, with the aim of improving the acute management of patients with or at risk of major bleeding events, specific reversal agents of antithrombotic drugs have been developed. Although these agents have demonstrated their effectiveness in small pharmacodynamic studies or clinical trials, it is important to consider that the benefit of reversal of an antiplatelet or anticoagulant drug must always be counterbalanced by the possible prothrombotic effect caused by the removal of antithrombotic protection as well as by prothrombotic mechanisms related to bleeding, major surgery or trauma.In this ANMCO/SIMEU consensus document we summarize the main characteristics and efficacy studies of the currently available reversal agents and present practical flow-charts in which we suggest their possible use in patients with active bleeding or at high risk of major bleeding events.

Anticoagulation-Associated Bleeding in Patients Screened for Atrial Fibrillation versus Usual Care-A Post Hoc Analysis from the LOOP Study.

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence is rising; however, data on the bleeding risks associated with the detection of subclinical AF are needed. Objective Our objective was to determine the bleeding increment associated with implantable loop recorder (ILR) screening for subclinical AF and subsequent anticoagulation initiation compared with usual care. Methods This post hoc study utilized LOOP trial data from 6,004 elderly patients with stroke risks randomized to either ILR ( n = 1,503) or usual care ( n = 4,503). The mean follow-up time was 64.5 months, and none were lost to follow-up. The primary exposure was the initiation of oral anticoagulation, and the main outcome was the risk of major bleeding events following initiation of oral anticoagulants (OACs), determined by time-dependent cox regression. Second, we investigated antithrombotic prescription patterns and major bleeding events after antiplatelet treatment and in subgroups. Results OAC was initiated in 1,019 participants with a mean age (years) of 78.8 (± 4.67) in control versus 77.0 (± 4.84) in ILR, p < 0.0001. Altogether did 202 participants end or pause OAC treatment. Among AF patients (n = 910) had 40 (28%) completely ended OAC and 105 (72%) temporarily paused OAC during follow-up. Major bleeding events totaled 221 (3.7%). Forty-seven major bleeding events followed an OAC initiation in 1,019 participants (4.6%); 26 versus 21 events in the control and ILR groups, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for major bleeding after OAC initiation compared with before initiation was 2.08 (1.50-2.90) p < 0.0001 overall, 2.81 (1.82-4.34) p < 0.0001 for control and 1.32 (0.78-2.23) p = 0.31 for the ILR group ( p = 0.07 for interaction). Antiplatelet treatment resulted in an overall adjusted HR of 1.3 (0.96-1.75) p = 0.09. For OAC users aged ≥75 years in the ILR group, the rate of major bleeding was 1.73 (0.92-2.96) compared with 0.84 (0.36-1.66) for an age <75 years, and the rate of the corresponding control subgroup aged ≥75 years was 2.20 (1.23-3.63) compared with 1.64 (0.82-2.93) for an age <75 years. Conclusion The individual risk of major bleeding increased twofold after initiation of oral anticoagulation for all patients in this study. However, the patients screened for subclinical AF did not have a higher bleeding risk after initiation of anticoagulation compared with those in usual care. Trial Registration: The LOOP study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT020364 50.

Benefit of Anticoagulation Early After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Using Bioprosthetic Valves.

To compare all-cause mortality and thromboembolic events in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) receiving anticoagulation with warfarin versus patients with no systemic anticoagulation. Using data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, we investigated adult patients having bioprosthetic sAVR with or without coronary artery bypass from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2019. Patients were classified into groups of nonwarfarin or warfarin (≥30 days of continuous prescription coverage after sAVR). One-to-one propensity score (PS) matching was used to adjust for group differences. Of 10,589 patients having sAVR, 7659 (72.3%) were in the nonwarfarin group and 2930 (27.7%) were in the warfarin group. After PS matching, 2930 pairs of patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 4.1 months (interquartile range [IQR], 2.6-7.4 months) for the warfarin group and 21.3 months (IQR, 7.8-24.0 months) for the nonwarfarin group. Overall mortality was lower for the warfarin group than for the nonwarfarin group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 1.00; P=.047), and there was a trend toward decreased cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events (subdistribution HR [SHR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.07; P=.09). Cumulative incidence of major bleeding events was higher for the warfarin group vs the nonwarfarin group (SHR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.28 to 2.94; P=.002). Results were similar in a subgroup analysis of patients undergoing isolated sAVR. During the prescription coverage period, warfarin use after bioprosthetic sAVR was associated with lower all-cause mortality and decreased risk of thromboembolism compared with not receiving warfarin. However, warfarin use was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events.

Oral anticoagulant use and outcomes in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation in the GLORIA-AF Registry

Abstract Background Ethnic differences in the management and outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been shown in previous studies, but available data is still limited, although urgently needed. Purpose to analyse oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription, OAC discontinuation, and long-term risk of major outcomes in Asian patients with AF, using data from a global prospective cohort study. Methods Using data from the GLORIA-AF Registry Phase II and III, we analysed patients according to their self-reported ethnicity (Asian vs. Non-Asian), and according to Asian ethnic subgroup (i.e. Chinese, Japanese, Korean and other Asian). Odds of OAC prescription were analysed through multivariable logistic regression, while the risk of OAC discontinuation and adverse outcomes were analysed through multivariable Cox-regression model. Primary outcome of this analysis was defined as the composite of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Results 34,421 AF patients were included (70.0±10.5 years, 45.1% females, 6,900 (20.0%) Asian). Compared to Non-Asian subjects, prescription of OAC and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) was lower in Asian subjects (Odds Ratio [OR] and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI): 0.23 [0.22-0.25] and 0.66 [0.61-0.71], respectively; Figure 1), but higher in the Japanese subgroup. Asian ethnicity was also associated with OAC discontinuation (Hazard Ratio [HR] and [95%CI]: 1.79 [1.67-1.92]), and lower risk of the primary composite outcome (HR [95%CI]: 0.86 [0.76-0.96]; Figure 2). Among the secondary outcomes, Asian patients had also higher risk of thromboembolism and intracranial haemorrhage, and lower risk of major bleeding events. Conclusions In this large, contemporary cohort of patients with AF, Asian subjects received suboptimal management of thromboembolic risk, and showed a peculiar long-term risk of adverse outcomes. Integrated and appropriate treatment of these patients is crucial to improve their prognosis.Figure 1Figure 2

Self-expanding or balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a German comparison

Abstract Background Studies demonstrated that results for self-expanding vs balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are similar, with larger subgroup analyzes missing. Methods We identified 46,243 self-expanding (SE) and balloon-expandable (BE) transfemoral TAVR for aortic stenosis in German hospitals in 2019 or 2020. Both in-hospital outcomes as well as subgroups for in-hospital mortality were analyzed. Results Regarding baseline characteristics, the logistic EuroSCORE was higher in SE (SE 13.6% - BE 12.7%; p&amp;lt;0.001), which also applied to age (SE 81.6a - BE 80.0a; p&amp;lt;0.001). There was a comparable in-hospital mortality rate in both groups (BE 2.37% - SE 2.35%; p=0.916). Risk adjusted in-hospital mortality was also not significantly different (OR=0.98, p=0.799). The SE group presented a significantly lower risk of major bleeding events (OR=0.83, p=0.006), however, there was a significantly higher risk of stroke (OR=1.38, p&amp;lt;0.001), risk of delirium (OR=1.15, p=0.001) as well as risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (OR=1.29, p&amp;lt;0.001). No difference has been found for acute kidney injury, mechanical ventilation &amp;gt;48h, length of hospital stay, and reimbursement. In addition, the subgroups showed no significant differences for in-hospital mortality regarding age, logistic EuroSCORE, gender, heart failure NYHA III/IV, previous coronary artery bypass graft, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, renal disease GFR &amp;lt;30ml/min or diabetes mellitus. Conclusion Self-expanding or balloon-expandable TAVR did not show significant differences for in-hospital mortality in a subgroup analysis in Germany.

The efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin in patients undergoing knee arthroscopic surgery and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PurposeTo inveatigate how effective LMWH was at preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding events, and minor bleeding events after simple knee arthroscopic surgery and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the CNKI database for potentially eligible articles. The outcomes were evaluated in terms of odds ratio (OR) and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was performed using the Stata software and subgroup analyses were performed based on the surgical setting including ACLR and simple knee arthroscopic surgery. ResultsA total of eight studies with 2249 patients and 1794 controls were included in this meta-analysis. In patients undergoing simple knee arthroscopic surgery, LMWH prophylaxis did not bring a significant reduction in the risk of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT), symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), symptomatic VTE, and did not increase the risk of major bleeding events, but did have a higher risk of minor bleeding events (OR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.34–2.84, P = 0.000) and a lower risk of asymptomatic DVT (OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.04–0.53, P = 0.004) in comparison with non-LMWH prophylaxis. In patients undergoing ACLR, LMWH prophylaxis did not bring a significant reduction in the risk of symptomatic DVT, symptomatic PE, symptomatic VTE, and did not increase the risk of major bleeding events and minor bleeding events, but did have a lower risk of asymptomatic DVT (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.23–0.78, P = 0.006). ConclusionWhen compared to a control group, this meta-analysis found that LMWH had little potential benefit in preventing major VTE (symptomatic VTE, symptomatic DVT, and symptomatic PE) after simple knee arthroscopy and ACLR. As a result, LMWH should not be considered routinely in patients undergoing knee arthroscopic surgery.

Pre-hospital use of direct oral anticoagulants agents is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding events in critically ill patients: A single academic center experience

BackgroundThe last decade has witnessed significant advancements in direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), transforming the landscape of anticoagulation therapy. With the uptrend in DOACs use, critical care physicians are encountering more patients with pre-hospital DOACs prescription. Safety and real world outcomes-related data on DOACs use in critically ill patients are scarce. ObjectiveWe assess the risk of major bleeding (MB) events and patient-centered outcomes with pre-hospital use of direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) compared to warfarin therapy. MethodsObservational study in a single large academic center from January 1st, 2012, through May 4th, 2018. We included adult critically ill patients with warfarin or one of the DOACs, as active medications at the time of hospital admission. The primary outcome was major bleeding (MB), based on the ISTH criteria Results99,481 patients were screened; 558 and 3037 patients were included in the final analysis for the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that the pre-hospital use of DOACs was associated with lower odds for major bleeding events, GI bleeding, need for endoscopic intervention, hemorrhagic shock, any blood transfusion; but higher odds of intracranial bleeding, as compared to warfarin use. There was no difference in hospital length of stay or ICU-free days. ConclusionsPre-hospital use of DOACs among critically ill patients is associated with lower major bleeding events, GI bleeding, need for endoscopic intervention, and blood transfusion but a higher risk for intracranial bleeding.

Effectiveness and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment for primary PCI in STEMI: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with both aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been shown to be associated with better outcomes. Yet, there is uncertainty regarding the optimal timing for its initiation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence on pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors in combination with aspirin in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).We performed a systematic search of electronic databases Pubmed, CENTRAL, and Scopus until April 2022. Studies were eligible if they compared P2Y12 inhibitor upstream administration to downstream use in patients with STEMI submitted to PCI. Studies with patients receiving fibrinolysis or medical therapy only were excluded. Outcomes were assessed at the shortest follow-up available.Out of 2491 articles, 3 RCT and 16 non-RCT studies were included, with a total of 79300 patients (66.1% pretreated, 66.0% treated with Clopidogrel). Pretreatment was associated with reduction in definite stent thrombosis (OR 0.61 [0.38-0.98]), all-cause death (OR 0.77 [0.60-0.97]), and cardiogenic shock (OR 0.60 [0.48-0.75]). It was also associated with a lower incidence of TIMI flow <3 pre-PCI (OR 0.78 [0.67-0.92]). However, incidence of recurrent MI was not significantly reduced (OR 0.93 [0.57-1.52]). Regarding safety, pretreatment was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding events (OR 0.83 [0.75-0.92]).Pretreatment with DAPT, including a P2Y12 inhibitor, was associated with better pre-PCI coronary perfusion, lower incidence of definite stent thrombosis, cardiogenic shock, and, possibly, all-cause mortality with no sign of potential harm encountered.

Outcomes after implantation of right-sided mechanical valve prostheses in congenital heart disease

BackgroundBioprosthetic valves are often used for pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) and tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) because of concerns about mechanical valve thrombosis in the right heart. The purpose of this...