You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Localized: Surgical Therapy IV (MP49)1 Sep 2021MP49-10 IMPACT OF SURGICAL APPROACH (OPEN VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE) ON ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER NEPHRECTOMY FOR LOCALISED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: A RECUR DATABASE PROJECT Giuseppe Fallara, Alessandro Larcher, Saeed Dabestani, Nicola Fossati, Petrus Järvinen, Harry Nisen, Eirikur Gudmundsson, Thomas B. Lam, Lorenzo Marconi, Sergio Fernandéz-Pello, Richard P. Meijer, Alessandro Volpe, Christian Beisland, Tobias Klatte, Grant D. Stewart, Börje Ljungberg, Francesco Montorsi, Axel Bex, and Umberto Capitanio Giuseppe FallaraGiuseppe Fallara More articles by this author , Alessandro LarcherAlessandro Larcher More articles by this author , Saeed DabestaniSaeed Dabestani More articles by this author , Nicola FossatiNicola Fossati More articles by this author , Petrus JärvinenPetrus Järvinen More articles by this author , Harry NisenHarry Nisen More articles by this author , Eirikur GudmundssonEirikur Gudmundsson More articles by this author , Thomas B. LamThomas B. Lam More articles by this author , Lorenzo MarconiLorenzo Marconi More articles by this author , Sergio Fernandéz-PelloSergio Fernandéz-Pello More articles by this author , Richard P. MeijerRichard P. Meijer More articles by this author , Alessandro VolpeAlessandro Volpe More articles by this author , Christian BeislandChristian Beisland More articles by this author , Tobias KlatteTobias Klatte More articles by this author , Grant D. StewartGrant D. Stewart More articles by this author , Börje LjungbergBörje Ljungberg More articles by this author , Francesco MontorsiFrancesco Montorsi More articles by this author , Axel BexAxel Bex More articles by this author , and Umberto CapitanioUmberto Capitanio More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002075.10AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The impact of open or minimally invasive surgery (either laparoscopic or robotic approach) on survival and disease recurrence in the management of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains uncertain. In this cohort study we assessed the impact of surgical approach on survival and on site-specific risk of first metastasis. METHODS: We used the RECUR database, a retrospective multi-institutional database of men diagnosed with RCC and submitted to renal surgery. We selected patient with pT1-3N0M0 RCC, and after propensity score matching (1:1 ratio, matching for age, year of surgery, gender, clinical size and pathological T stage surgical) a for open vs. minimally invasive surgery, either laparoscopic- or robot-assisted, the impact of surgical modality on overall survival (OS) and Progression-free Survival (PFS, including both distant or local recurrence) were assessed by use of Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Site-specific risk of first recurrence, i.e. local recurrence or abdominal, thoracic and uncommon sites metastasis, was investigated by use of competing risk regression and cumulative incidence curves. In case of local recurrence propensity score matching model was implemented with surgical technique (partial vs. radical nephrectomy) RESULTS: After matching, 1027 patients in open and 1027in minimally invasive surgery were included in the study. After a median follow up of 62 months, 124 patients in open and 127 in minimally invasive group developed local recurrence and/or distant metastsis; no differences were found in terms of OS (HR 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.04; p=0.24) and PFS (HR 1.05; 95%CI 0.81-1.35; p-value=0.73) between the two groups. A higher risk of local recurrence (sHR 2.65; 95% CI 1.42-4.97; p-value 0.002) and uncommon site metastases (sHR 1.6; 95 CI 1.02-2.52; p-value 0.042) was found for minimally invasive surgery. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found in terms of OS and PFS between open and minimally invasive surgery. However, the risk for local recurrence and uncommon metastases was statistically higher for minimally invasive surgery. Given the overall low risk of recurrence, careful surveillance is the best management option for most patients. Source of Funding: © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e879-e879 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Giuseppe Fallara More articles by this author Alessandro Larcher More articles by this author Saeed Dabestani More articles by this author Nicola Fossati More articles by this author Petrus Järvinen More articles by this author Harry Nisen More articles by this author Eirikur Gudmundsson More articles by this author Thomas B. Lam More articles by this author Lorenzo Marconi More articles by this author Sergio Fernandéz-Pello More articles by this author Richard P. Meijer More articles by this author Alessandro Volpe More articles by this author Christian Beisland More articles by this author Tobias Klatte More articles by this author Grant D. Stewart More articles by this author Börje Ljungberg More articles by this author Francesco Montorsi More articles by this author Axel Bex More articles by this author Umberto Capitanio More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...