Risk Of Febrile Neutropenia Research Articles

Cost-effectiveness of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of uterine body leiomyosarcomas. A retrospective analysis

Background. The main approach in the treatment of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma is surgery followed by chemotherapy, which is the basis of treatment. Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a life-threatening condition, so the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after each cycle of chemotherapy in this category of patients remains an integral part. Aim. To evaluate the pharmacoeconomic efficacy of the use of short and long-acting G-CSF forms in a round-the-clock inpatient facility (RIF). Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of economic expenditures was performed at the Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Center of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine in the RIF setting for the period from January 2018 to December 2023 for the treatment of 62 patients with high-grade uterine leiomyosarcomas of stage IB–IVA according to the classification of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009). All patients underwent surgical treatment, complete hysterectomy with appendages, followed by antitumor drug therapy with a high risk of FN. In the economic cost analysis, the treatment regimens gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 + docetaxel 100 mg/m2 + empegfilgrastim (regimen code sh1207.1) and gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 + docetaxel 100 mg/m2 + filgrastim (regimen code sh1070) were compared. The costs of clinical blood tests and staying in RIF were also considered. Results. The stay in the RIF was 9 bed days with a long-acting G-CSF regimen and 15 days with a short-acting G-CSF regimen. When using a treatment regimen with filgrastim in 6 patients, the number of bed days increased to 18 due to persistent neutropenia. No FN events were reported. The calculations consisted of the cost of a bed day in the RIF (1,660 rubles) and purchasing of short- and long-acting G-CSF, without the cost of the main therapy. The costs of treating patients with short-acting G-CSF were comparable to those with long-acting G-CSF. Conclusion. The regimen with long-acting G-CSF is effective, easy to use, and cost-effective in RIF settings.

Alternative therapy for lymphoma with febrile neutropenia using traditional Chinese medicine: A case report

IntroductionFebrile neutropenia is a common complication in patients undergoing chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis is consistently associated with a notable reduction in the risk of febrile neutropenia. However, the use of G-CSF in patients who are already neutropenic from chemotherapy remains controversial. Studies have shown that 12.9% of cancer patients incorporate traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to alleviate chemotherapy side effects in Taiwan; thereby providing an alternative management strategy for neutropenic fever in cancer patients. Case presentationThis is an 18-year-old female with newly diagnosed precursor T-lymphoblastic lymphoma. After chemotherapy, the patient developed febrile neutropenia. Despite the use of antibiotics and G-CSF, the febrile neutropenia persisted for two months. Approximately ten days after the initiation of traditional Chinese medicine decoction with the strategy of tonifying the spleen and stomach, clearing yin fire, and uplifting yang, her absolute neutrophil count (ANC) had gradually increased. Additionally, after two weeks of treatment, her fever subsided. The patient continued with chemotherapy and was discharged in stable condition. DiscussionAntibiotic use aligns with the TCM perspective of an “attack” approach. Conversely, our TCM decoction was designed to raise the ANC by tonifying the spleen and stomach, clearing Yin Fire, and uplifting Yang. Li Dongyuan, one of the four great masters of the Jin Yuan Dynasty, created the formula: Bupiwei Shengyang Sanhuo Decoction that is notable in this regard. The herbs in our decoction have shown hematopoietic and myelosuppression-alleviating effect. For many patients who do not respond adequately to G-CSF alone, integrative treatments involving both TCM and Western medicine can offer additional therapeutic benefits by increasing blood cell counts.

Prophylactic Antimicrobials for Prevention of Febrile Neutropenia in Tumour-Bearing Dogs Treated With Lomustine.

CCNU (1-[2-chloroethyl]-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosurea), lomustine, is an oral alkylating agent in the nitrosourea subgroup. The dose-limiting toxicity of CCNU is neutropenia most frequently documented 7 days after its administration. Use of prophylactic antimicrobials to prevent chemotherapy-related febrile neutropenia (FN) and its associated morbidity and mortality has been well-documented in human oncology, but this information is limited in the veterinary literature. The purpose of this multi-institutional retrospective study was to assess whether antimicrobial prophylaxis reduced the risk of FN approximately 7 days after CCNU administration in tumour-bearing dogs. A secondary goal was to identify risk factors for fever development in neutropenic dogs. Two hundred dogs were included in the study. One hundred and fifty-three dogs (76.5%) were neutropenic at the first post-CCNU recheck. One hundred and six (69.3%) dogs received prophylactic antimicrobials and 47 (30.7%) did not. Of the 106 dogs on prophylactic antimicrobials, 8 (7.5%) developed FN. Of the 47 dogs in the no-prophylactic antimicrobials group, 4 (8.5%) developed FN. Use of prophylactic antimicrobials did not reduce the risk of development of FN (p = 0.84). Older age (> 9 y), lower weight and body surface area, and pre-treatment with chemotherapy or radiation therapy were significantly associated with development of FN (p = 0.009, p = 0.023, p = 0.015 and p = 0.01). Patients with a lower absolute neutrophil count, and a higher VCOG-CTCAE v2 neutropenia grade were also at an increased risk of developing FN (p = 0.01, p < 0.001). Additional studies may help establish guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in dogs treated with CCNU, especially for those at high-risk for FN.

Humoral Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-Boost in Cancer Patients: A Case Series from a Southern European Cancer Center

Background: Cancer patients face a greater risk of complications and death after contracting the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine were suggested to provide additional protection. This study aimed to assess how cancer patients’ immune systems respond to the booster shots and categorize their responses. Methods: We analyzed 735 samples from 422 individuals, including patients followed at the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto). Three cohorts were recruited, and blood samples were collected 3- and 6-months post-booster dose: cohort 1 cancer patients (also collected before the booster); cohort 2 cancer patients; and cohort 3 (healthy individuals). Humoral immune response was evaluated by analyzing IgG levels against the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein. IgG levels against the SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid(N) protein was also analyzed in order to address previous contact with the virus. Results: Among Cohort 1 patients with solid tumors, when compared to pre-boost, IgG S levels increased 3 months after the boost and remained high after 6 months. Patients with hematologic tumors demonstrated lower IgG S levels at both timepoints. Comparing the IgG S levels among hematological tumors, solid tumors, and healthy individuals in both timepoints we observed that the healthy individuals had the strongest IgG S response, followed by the solid, and, lastly, the hematologic tumors. Solid tumor patients undergoing chemotherapy had reduced IgG S levels, especially those on high febrile neutropenia risk regimens. Conclusions: In conclusion, cancer patients have a weaker immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, especially those with hematological cancers. Chemotherapy and febrile neutropenia risk further reduce booster effectiveness. Further research is needed to optimize vaccine timing for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Knowledge, attitude and practice towards chemotherapy-related neutropenia and febrile neutropenia among breast cancer patients.

This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) towards chemotherapy-related neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) among breast cancer patients. The major hypothesis was that demographic characteristics influence patients' KAP regarding chemotherapy-related neutropenia and FN. A multi-centre cross-sectional study. Conducted in four secondary care hospitals between April and June 2023. The study enrolled 246 breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Participants were aged 18 years or older, currently on chemotherapy and willing to complete the questionnaire. Exclusion criteria included significant cognitive impairments. Primary outcome measures were KAP scores regarding chemotherapy-related neutropenia and FN. Secondary outcomes included factors associated with adequate knowledge and positive attitudes. A total of 246 patients completed the questionnaire. The mean knowledge score was 12.46±6.21 (range: 0-26), and the mean attitude score was 30.00±2.58 (range: 7-35). Less than half of the patients (45.95%) knew whether their chemotherapy protocol was high risk for FN, while 79.67% were aware of the need for prophylactic administration of leukocyte-raising agents. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that having a junior college education or higher was significantly associated with knowledge scores (OR=4.69, 95% CI 2.23 to 9.89, p<0.001). Living in urban areas was associated with attitude scores (OR=0.58, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.97, p=0.037). Structural equation modelling analysis indicated that experience with chemotherapy-related neutropenia or FN influenced knowledge to some degree (β=1.77, p=0.029). The study found inadequate knowledge, a positive attitude and suboptimal practice towards chemotherapy-related neutropenia and FN among breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Tailored education programmes are needed to improve KAP in this patient population. Further research should explore additional demographic and psychosocial factors influencing KAP to develop comprehensive educational interventions.

Trends in the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factors for older patients with cancer, 2010 to 2019

IntroductionOlder patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive treatment are at an increased risk for developing febrile neutropenia (FN) or having chemotherapy dose-reductions or delays, resulting in suboptimal health outcomes. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) are effective medications to reduce these adverse events and are recommended for patients ≥65 years receiving chemotherapy with >10 % FN risk. We sought to characterize the trends and predictors of G-CSF use between the youngest-old (66–74 years), middle-old (75–84 years), and oldest-old (≥85 years) patients with cancer. Materials and MethodsWe used registry data from SEER-Medicare for breast, lung, ovarian, colorectal, esophageal, gastric, uterine, prostate, pancreatic cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) diagnoses from 2010 to 2019. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used. ResultsOverall, 41.4 % of patients received G-CSF from chemotherapy initiation to three days after completion of the first chemotherapy course. The use rate remained relatively stable for all cancers, except for an increase in use for those with pancreatic cancer. G-CSF use decreased as patients got older. The oldest-old were 43.0 % (95 % confidence interval: 40.7–45.2 %) less likely to receive G-CSF compared to the youngest-old. Patients with breast cancer or NHL were more likely to receive G-CSF than those with other cancers. Patients who were female, married, White or Hispanic, and had fewer comorbidities were more likely to receive G-CSF. DiscussionG-CSF is used less often in populations at higher risk of developing FN and related complications. Improving adherence to recommendations can improve health outcomes, especially in the oldest adults, older males, and Black patients.

Cost of Pegfilgrastim for the Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Perioperative Chemotherapy in Daily Practice in Japan: A Posthoc Analysis in a Single-center Retrospective Study.

This study aimed to estimate the medical costs associated with febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim and evaluate its impact on survival outcomes in daily practice in Japan. In this single-center retrospective study, we obtained data from 296 Japanese patients with breast cancer receiving fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC)-100 chemotherapy; the patients were divided into the pegfilgrastim and non-pegfilgrastim groups. We analyzed the median costs of chemotherapy, drugs for all adverse events (AEs) and FN, and hospitalization due to FN. We also assessed the survival outcomes. The pegfilgrastim group showed a significantly higher median total cost (JPY 872320.0 vs. JPY 466715.0, p<0.001). This difference was associated with the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim. The median costs of the drugs for all AE treatments were JPY 9030.4 and JPY 24690.6, with the non-pegfilgrastim group showing a significantly higher cost (p<0.001). In 11 patients hospitalized for FN management, no significant difference in hospitalization cost was observed between the pegfilgrastim and non-pegfilgrastim groups (JPY 512390.0 vs. JPY 307555.0, p=0.102). No significant difference in the 3-year overall survival was observed between the pegfilgrastim and non-pegfilgrastim groups (79.9% vs. 88.3%, p=0.672). In this study, although the total medical cost in daily practice increased because of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim, the 3-year overall survival was not impacted by the use of pegfilgrastim. Our study data suggested that the primary prophylaxis pegfilgrastim should be used during FEC-100 chemotherapy based on the patient-related FN risk factors, instead of routine use.

Mecapegfilgrastim for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in children and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma: a prospective, single-arm, pilot study

BackgroundThe chemotherapy regimens recommended for both rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES) patients are myelosuppressive and can reduce the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and subsequently increase the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). However, only a few studies have focused on the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) drugs in pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS and ES. Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim, a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim, in prophylaxis of FN for pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES.MethodsIn this single-arm, single-center, prospective study, pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES were enrolled to receive either VAC (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, dactinomycin) regimen or VDC (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) regimen in a 3-week cycle, followed by treatment with mecapegfilgrastim (100 μg/kg, maximum 6 mg) given at 24 h after completing chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of FN. Secondary endpoints included the incidence rate of grade 4 neutropenia, duration of ANC ≤ 0.5 × 109/L, incidence rate of chemotherapy delay or reduction, use of antibiotics, and safety profile.ResultsIn total, 2 of the 30 (6.7%, 95% CI: 0.82–22.07) patients experienced FN after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Eight (26.7%, 95% CI: 12.28–45.89) patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia after receiving prophylactic mecapegfilgrastim. Eight patients experienced ANC ≤ 0.5 × 109/L with a median duration of 4.5 days; among them, 6 patients reached the lowest point of their ANC level on day 7, and 5 of them recovered by day 10. No dose reductions, delays, or discontinuation of chemotherapy was reported. Twenty-one (70.0%) patients received antibiotics during the treatment period. No patient experienced FN in the 0–5 years and the 13–18 years groups, and 2 patients experienced FN in the 6–12 years group. Two patients, 6 patients, and no patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia in the 0–5 years, 6–12 years, and 13–18 years groups, respectively.ConclusionMecapegfilgrastim showed acceptable efficacy and safety profile in pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES. Further randomized studies with large sample size are warranted.Trial registrationThis clinical trial was registered at Chictr.org.cn (No.ChiCTR1900022249). Registered on March 31, 2019.

Safety of first-line systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety of first-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer through network meta-analysis.MethodsThe literature from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was searched from the inception of the databases to August 15, 2023, and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to screen studies. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool (RoB 2.0) was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 15.0 and R4.3.1 software to compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) among different treatment regimens.ResultsA total of 53 randomized controlled trials, involving 17,351 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), were ultimately included, encompassing 29 different therapeutic approaches. According to SUCRA rankings, the CAPOX regimen is most likely to rank first in terms of safety, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen is most likely to rank last. In terms of specific AEs, the CAPOX regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs (bevacizumab and cetuximab), is associated with a reduced risk of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, as well as an increased risk of thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. The FOLFOX regimen, with or without bevacizumab, is linked to an increased risk of neutropenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy. The FOLFIRI/CAPIRI + bevacizumab regimen is associated with a reduced risk of peripheral sensory neuropathy. S-1 and S-1 + oxaliplatin are well-tolerated in terms of gastrointestinal reactions. The FOLFOXIRI regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs, is associated with various AEs.ConclusionIn summary, the CAPOX regimen may be the safest option among the first-line systemic treatment regimens for mCRC patients, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen may be associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs.

Effectiveness and safety of empegfilgrastim (Extimia®) in patients with solid tumors receiving cytotoxic therapy: final results of the DEFENDOR study

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Extimia® (empegfilgrastim, JSC "BIOCAD") in reducing the frequency, duration of neutropenia, the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and infections caused by FN in patients with solid tumors receiving myelosuppressive therapy. Materials and methods. The paper presents the final results of a multicenter prospective observational post-marketing study of the safety and effectiveness of Extimia® (empegfilgrastim) in patients with solid tumors receiving cytotoxic therapy. For the primary prevention of FN, all patients received empegfilgrastim at 7.5 mg subcutaneously once per course of chemotherapy (CT) 24 hours after the end of CT administration. The primary endpoint included an assessment of the relative dose-intensity (RDI) of the CT courses administered. The endpoints of interest included the assessment of the RDI of CT courses by nosology and CT regimen, the frequency of dose-limiting neutropenia, and the incidence of all adverse events (AEs) in patients who received at least one dose of the study medication, including serious AEs. Results. From February 2021 to December 2022, 3218 patients with various malignancies were included in 41 study centers of the Russian Fede- ration. Of these, 3217 (99.97%) patients received at least one dose of the study drug, and 2663 (82.8%) patients were included in the RDI evaluation population according to the study protocol. The mean age in this group was 56.9 (18–84) years. RDI ≥85% was achieved in 2,415 (90.7%) patients. The mean RDI was 96.2%, with a median of 100%. FN risk factors were present in 1216 (45.7%) patients, with age ≥65 years being the most common risk factor at 761/2663 (28.6%). It should be noted that in patients younger than 65 years, the RDI was 91.5%, and in elderly patients (≥65 years) 88.7%. Dose-limiting neutropenia was reported in 19 (0.7%) patients. There were 74 cases of grade 3–4 AEs (according to CTCAE v.5) in 59 (1.8%) patients. The most common were neutropenia, anemia, and diarrhea in 19 (0.7%), 7 (0.2%), and 6 (0.2%) patients, respectively. Serious AEs were reported in 17 patients (0.5%). Conclusion. Primary prophylaxis of FN with long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor empegfilgrastim effectively maintains RDI in various nosological and therapeutic groups of patients with different CT regimens in real-world clinical practice.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022.

Chemotherapy for breast cancer can cause neutropenia, increasing the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and serious infections. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) as primary prophylaxis has been explored to mitigate these risks. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of primary G-CSF prophylaxis in patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. A systematic literature review was conducted according to the "Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development" using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies assessing using G-CSF as primary prophylaxis in invasive breast cancer were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and FN incidence. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes with sufficient data. Eight RCTs were included in the qualitative analysis, and five RCTs were meta-analyzed for FN incidence. The meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in FN incidence with primary G-CSF prophylaxis (risk difference [RD] = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.01-0.43, p = 0.04). Evidence for improvement in OS with G-CSF was inconclusive. Four RCTs suggested a tendency for increased pain with G-CSF, but statistical significance was not reported. Primary prophylactic use of G-CSF is strongly recommended for breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, as it has been shown to reduce the incidence of FN. While the impact on OS is unclear, the benefits of reducing FN are considered to outweigh the potential harm of increased pain.

Association of Vitamin A and D Deficiencies with Infectious Outcomes in Children Undergoing Intensive Induction Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

To evaluate the association between deficiency of vitamin A or D at diagnosis of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and subsequent infectious complications during induction therapy. We conducted an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study of children with newly diagnosed ALL from 2007 to 2017 at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. We measured vitamin D, vitamin D binding protein, retinol binding protein as a surrogate for vitamin A, and immunoglobulin isotypes in serum obtained at ALL diagnosis, and we assessed the association between vitamin deficiencies or levels and infection-related complications during the 6-week induction phase using Cox regression models. Among 378 evaluable participants, vitamin A and D deficiencies were common (43% and 17%, respectively). Vitamin D deficiency was associated with higher risks of febrile neutropenia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.7; P=.0072), clinically documented infection (aHR, 1.73; P=.025), and likely bacterial infection (aHR, 1.86; P=.008). Conversely, vitamin A deficiency was associated solely with a lower risk of sepsis (aHR, 0.19; P=.027). In this retrospective study, vitamin D deficiency was associated with an increased risk of common infection-related complications during induction therapy for ALL. Additional studies are warranted to evaluate whether vitamin D supplementation could mitigate this effect.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer in Taiwan.

To examine the cost-effectiveness of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for primary or secondary prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer from the perspective of Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration. A Markov model was constructed to simulate the events that may occur during and after a high-risk chemotherapy treatment. Various G-CSF prophylaxis strategies and medications were compared in the model. Effectiveness data were derived from the literature and an analysis of the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Cost data were obtained from a published NHIRD study, and health utility values were also obtained from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of the cost-effectiveness results. In the base-case analysis, primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of NT$269,683 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared to primary prophylaxis with lenograstim. The ICER for primary prophylaxis with lenograstim versus no G-CSF prophylaxis was NT$61,995 per QALY gained. The results were most sensitive to variations in relative risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) for pegfilgrastim versus no G-CSF prophylaxis. Furthermore, in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of one times Taiwan's gross domestic product per capita, the probability of being cost-effective was 88.1% for primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim. Our study suggests that primary prophylaxis with either short- or long-acting G-CSF could be considered cost-effective for FN prevention in breast cancer patients receiving high-risk regimens.

Abstract PO1-12-06: Is it appropriate to select patients for primary prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim based on the risk of febrile neutropenia?

Abstract Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN), a major hematologic adverse event in perioperative chemotherapy for breast cancer, is more prevalent among Asians than in Caucasian populations. Four main guidelines, i.e., ASCO, EORTC, NCCN, and ESMO, provide recommendations regarding the appropriate use of hematopoietic growth factors. These guidelines recommend primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) based on the estimated incidence of FN, primarily defined by the chemotherapy regimen. G-CSF administration is recommended when the incidence of FN is ≥20% or 10–20% with risk(s). However, the incidence of FN varies depending on the trial and design, and patient-specific risk factors for FN remain unclear. We previously performed a multicenter prospective cohort study in Japan, the CSPOR-BC FN study, evaluating the incidence of FN during perioperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. Herein, we conducted an additional analysis to explore thresholds of patient-specific risk factors for FN that could be evaluated before chemotherapy. We analyzed the risk factors for FN and verified the appropriateness of patient selection for prophylactic G-CSF administration. Methods: The previously reported CSPOR-BC FN study (PubMed ID=33631458) consecutively enrolled 1005 patients with stage I–III breast cancer between August 2015 and July 2017. In the current additional analysis, we intended to have 477 patients in the visiting group that evaluated true-FN, defined as ≥37.5℃ and grade 4 neutropenia. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for FN was performed, followed by the determination of cutoff values for age and pretreatment absolute neutrophil count (ANC) as risk factors. Results: Chemotherapy regimens administered were FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) in 170 patients (36%), E(A)C (epirubicin (doxorubicin) + cyclophosphamide) in 165 patients (35%), and TC (docetaxel + cyclophosphamide) in 142 patients (30%). The incidence of FN was 28.7% (N = 137). To evaluate the risk factors for FN, we predefined regimens, age, performance status (PS), stage, chemotherapy or radiotherapy history, infectious wounds, open wounds, ANC, and renal and liver dysfunction as potential risk factors. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for FN identified regimen (TC), age (≥65), low pretreatment ANC, treatment setting, and no primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis as significant risk factors. Two patient-specific risk factors (age and pretreatment ANC) were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age≥65 years was a significant risk factor (odds ratio=2.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.34–3.75). Applying a cutoff of 65 years (age) to predict FN, the sensitivity and specificity were 28.4 and 83.8%, respectively, which were inaccurate. Despite applying a cutoff of 67 years optimized from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the sensitivity (22.4%), specificity (90.7%), and area under the curve (0.519) indicated low discrimination for predicting FN. The incidence of FN by age group was as follows: &amp;lt; 45 years, 30.8%; 45–55 years, 26.4%; 55–64 years, 20.9%; ≥65 years, 39.6%. Additionally, applying a cutoff of 2436/µL (pretreatment ANC) optimized from the ROC curve, the observed sensitivity (27.6%) and specificity (83.8%), and area under the curve (0.558) also indicated low discrimination for predicting FN. The incidence of FN by stratum of pretreatment ANC was as follows: &amp;lt; 2000, 33.3%; 2000–3000, 30.7%; 3000–4000, 29.9%; and &amp;gt;4000, 24.6. Accordingly, setting a cutoff value to predict FN incidence using age and/or pretreatment ANC was deemed inappropriate. Conclusion: Selecting patients for primary prophylactic G-CSF based on the existing FN risk can be challenging. Primary prophylactic G-CSF would be considered for every patient undergoing perioperative chemotherapy for breast cancer, especially Asians. ROC curve for FN and age. The AUC was 0.519. ROC curve for FN and neutrophil count. The AUC was 0.558. Citation Format: Kazutaka Narui, Takashi Ishikawa, Ikumi Takashima, Kosuke Kashiwabara, Yukari Uemura, Yuichiro Kikawa, Naruto Taira, Hirofumi Mukai. Is it appropriate to select patients for primary prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim based on the risk of febrile neutropenia? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-12-06.

Abstract PO2-12-12: REaCT 5G: A randomized study comparing bone pain after 5 days of filgrastim or one day of pegfilgrastim for primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer

Abstract Background: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) such as filgrastim (FIL) or pegfilgrastim (PEG) significantly reduces the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and treatment-related hospitalization in patients with early breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. However, patients receiving G-CSF can experience clinically significant bone pain. Previous studies examining post-GCSF bone pain were mostly based on physician pain assessment and compared mixed doses (30/60/100 μg/kg) of PEG vs. FIL (5μg/kg/day or 300 μg/day) given for 7 to 14 days. Based on a randomized non-inferiority study, 5 days of FIL is considered non-inferior to 10 days of FIL to prevent FN and hospitalizations and is frequently used in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Patient-reported bone pain after 5 days of FIL vs. single dose of PEG has never been compared in a prospective randomized study and has important implications for patient and physician treatment preferences. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label trial, patients receiving neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer requiring primary FN prophylaxis with G-CSF were randomized 1:1 to either 5 days of FIL (300 μg or 480μg if ≥ 90 kg) or 1 day of PEG (6 mg) with each cycle of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was bone pain using area under the curve (AUC) of the daily pain score from days 1-5 (AUC score 0 to 40) during cycle 1. We used linear regression adjusting for stratification factors [cancer center (2 centers) and chemotherapy regimen (taxane (TAX) or anthracycline (ANTH)-based during cycle 1] and prespecified baseline covariates: age, pain, and use of pain medications pre-chemotherapy. Supportive analysis of bone pain across cycles 1 to 4 was conducted using repeated linear regression. Key secondary endpoints included incidence of FN, hospitalizations, chemotherapy delay, dose-reduction or discontinuation, and chemotherapy-related deaths. Results: From June 2021 to March 2023, 233 patients were enrolled, with 217 patients (108 FIL/109 PEG) in the intention-to-treat analysis; 16 (7.4%) patients were excluded because of incomplete follow-up. Participants were mean age 55.6 years; almost exclusively female (99.1%), on chemotherapy regimen TAX 57% vs. ANTH 43%, had mean baseline pain score 1.12, and prevalence of pain medication use pre-chemotherapy was acetaminophen 14.7%, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) 6.0% and opioids 3.2%. Characteristics were balanced between arms (Table 1). After repeated measures linear regression adjusted for age, chemotherapy regimen, baseline pain, and use of pain medications pre-chemotherapy, mean AUC for bone pain at cycle 1 was 10.94 for FIL and 10.12 for PEG (mean difference 0.82; 95% CI: -1.59, 3.23; p = 0.516). There was no significant difference between arms across treatment cycles (interaction p = 0.785; mean time-averaged difference 0.28; 95% CI: -1.75, 2.32). Across cycles 1 to 4, mean peak pain over 5 days post-GCSF was 3.27 vs. 3.41 (p=0.700); frequency of bone pain during first 8 days (pain score &amp;gt; 0) was 52.5% vs. 51.3%; p=0.358, and mean frequency of severe pain (pain score ≥ 5) was 17.5% vs. 15.2%; p=0.014 for FIL vs. PEG, respectively. The incidence of FN [4.6% vs. 0%, absolute difference 4.6% (95% CI: -0.3%, 9.5%; p=0.069)] and hospitalization [FN and non-FN related: 10.2% vs. 1.8%, absolute difference of 8.4% (95% CI: 1.2%, 15.5%; p=0.021)] was higher in the FIL group. There were no significant differences in chemotherapy delay (13% vs. 11%; p=0.815), dose reduction (14.8% vs. 14.7%; p=0.999), early discontinuation (8.3% vs. 5.5%; p=0.580), or chemotherapy-related death (0.9% vs. 0%; p=0.996) in the FIL vs. PEG groups, respectively. Conclusion: There was no difference in patient-reported bone pain after 5 days of FIL or PEG, even after controlling for important clinical factors. Importantly, the study observed higher rates of FN and hospitalizations in patients receiving FIL for 5 days only. Table 1 Baseline Characteristics Citation Format: Terry Ng, Yuxin Zhang, Carol Stober, Jennifer Shamess, Natalie Mills, Stuart Nicholls, Mohammed Ibrahim, Daniel Davoudpour, Christopher Armiento, Marie-France Savard, Moira Rushton, Arif Awan, Sandeep Sehdev, John Hilton, Xinni Song, Rakesh Goel, Fiona Macdonald, Kelly Daigle, Lisa Vandermeer, Monica Taljaard, Mark Clemons. REaCT 5G: A randomized study comparing bone pain after 5 days of filgrastim or one day of pegfilgrastim for primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-12-12.

Comparison of two autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies in patients with multiple myeloma: CE plus G-CSF versus G-CSF only: A single-center retrospective analysis.

Despite recent advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an essential therapeutic keystone. As for the stem cell mobilization procedure, different regimens have been established, usually consisting of a cycle of chemotherapy followed by application of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), although febrile neutropenia is a common complication. Following national guidelines, our institution decided to primarily use G-CSF only mobilization during the COVID-19 pandemic to minimize the patients' risk of infection and to reduce the burden on the health system. In this retrospective single-center analysis, the efficacy and safety of G-CSF only mobilization was evaluated and compared to a historic control cohort undergoing chemotherapy-based mobilization by cyclophosphamide and etoposide (CE) plus G-CSF. Although G-CSF only was associated with a higher need for plerixafor administration (p < .0001) and a higher number of apheresis sessions per patient (p = .0002), we were able to collect the target dose of hematopoietic stem cells in the majority of our patients. CE mobilization achieved higher hematopoietic stem cell yields (p = .0015) and shorter apheresis sessions (p < .0001) yet was accompanied by an increased risk of febrile neutropenia (p < .0001). There was no difference in engraftment after ASCT. G-CSF only mobilization is a useful option in selected patients with comorbidities and an increased risk of serious infections, especially in the wintertime or in future pandemics.

Survivorship Struggles: Navigating Etiologies and Clinical Parameters of Febrile Neutropenia During Induction Chemotherapy in Acute Leukemia Patients.

Background Acute leukemia, characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of immature white blood cell precursors, poses significant challenges during induction chemotherapy, including the elevated risk of febrile neutropenia and its associated complications. Our study aims to explain the clinical and etiological parameters of these patients in a resource-limited setting. Methods This retrospective study focused on a total of 102 adult patients with acute leukemia who developed febrile neutropenia during the induction chemotherapy phase. Patients with disease relapse, prior bone marrow transplantation, and cases of acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded from the study. Demographical characteristics, symptoms at presentation, diagnoses, infectious causes, and outcomes were systematically reported. Infectious etiologies and detailed culture reports were meticulously tabulated, and subsequent data were analyzed. Results Of the 102 patients, 43 (42.2%) were males, with a mean age of 31.9 ± 6.5 years. During the induction chemotherapy, a total of 31 patients died of complicated febrile neutropenia. Severe vomiting was the most common symptom present in 37 (36.2%), followed by cough in 35 (34.3%) and loose stools in 28 (27.5%). Community-acquired pneumonia, neutropenic sepsis, and neutropenic colitis were among the most common etiologies of febrile neutropenia. A total of 72 (70.6%) patients had culture-proven multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia that contributed to poor outcomes. Conclusions Acute leukemia patients undergoing induction chemotherapy face high infection-associated mortality due to their immunocompromised state. Inadequate infection control measures and antimicrobial resistancecontribute to the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms. Enhanced infection prevention strategies and evidence-based antibiotic prescription guidelines are need of time in resource-limited settings such as Pakistan to address febrile neutropenia complications and bridge the existing care gap in its management.

The Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor as Primary Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: An Experience of Moroccan Oncologists.

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a frequent and serious emergency for oncologic patients undergoing chemotherapy. Using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia is an integral part of the management of cancer patients. Our study aims to identify the challenges that prevent Moroccan oncologists from prescribing G-CSF for primary prevention. Seventy doctors participated in our study, with a participation rate of 35.35%. Twenty-two participants had at least five years of experience in oncology. Most participants were medical oncologists (82.9%), and two-thirds of them practiced in teaching hospitals. Regarding the use of G-CSF in primary prevention, all participants complied with the recommendations for FN risk assessment and the prescription of G-CSF for prophylaxis in patients at high risk of FN (>20%). However, their use in intermediate-risk patients remains limited mainly by the cost of these drugs (45.7% of participants). FN remains a dreadful complication in oncology. Since the introduction of G-CSF into standard oncology practice, particularly in primary prevention, the management of certain patients has improved considerably. Nevertheless, the indications for G-CSF in our context, essentially in intermediate-risk patients, are uncertain.

Predictive Model for Occurrence of Febrile Neutropenia after Chemotherapy in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Observational Study.

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a major concern in patients undergoing chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, the overall risk of FN is difficult to assess. This study aimed to develop a model for predicting the occurrence of FN in patients with DLBCL. In this multicenter, retrospective, observational analysis, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between FN incidence and pretreatment clinical factors. We included adult inpatients and outpatients (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with DLBCL who were treated with chemotherapy. The study examined 246 patients. Considering FN occurring during the first cycle of chemotherapy as the primary outcome, a predictive model with a total score of 5 points was constructed as follows: 1 point each for a positive hepatitis panel, extranodal involvement, and a high level of soluble interleukin-2 receptor and 2 points for lymphopenia. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of this model was 0.844 (95% confidence interval: 0.777-0.911). Our predictive model can assess the risk of FN before patients with DLBCL start chemotherapy, leading to better outcomes.

Phase II study of the safety and efficacy of discontinuing pegfilgrastim for pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with FOLFIRINOX.

663 Background: The original FOLFIRINOX regimen (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN), and pegfilgrastim has been used to reduce the risk. However, it remains unclear how long pegfilgrastim needs to continue. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX after discontinuing pegfilgrastim in PDAC patients. Methods: This prospective phase II trial included patients with PDAC who received the first three courses of FOLFIRINOX, with primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis for FN, and did not experience FN. The patients continued on FOLFIRINOX without pegfilgrastim from the fourth course. The primary endpoint was development of FN. The secondary endpoints included relative dose intensity (RDI), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The threshold and expected development of FN were 20% and 7%, respectively, at a one-sided significance level of 0.10 and statistical power of 80%. Based on this hypothesis, we calculated the number of patients needed to be 33. Results: In total, 34 patients (20 male, median age 66 years) were enrolled from August 2017 to September 2021. Twenty-three patients were unresectable, and 11 were borderline resectable. FN developed in one patient. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in six patients, grade 3 neutropenia in 10 (29.4%), anemia in four (11.8%), diarrhea in two (5.9%), and malaise, lung infection, peripheral sensory neuropathy, colitis, and biliary tract infection in one (2.9%) each. Twenty-two patients required dose reduction, mainly because of neutropenia. Mean RDIs at the sixth course of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin, acute infusion of fluorouracil, and continuous infusion of fluorouracil were 77.0%, 88.2%, 81.8%, 84.4%, and 87.6%, respectively. ORR, median PFS, and median OS were 44.1%, 15.8 months, and 25.8 months, respectively. Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX can be continued safely with a low incidence of FN after discontinuing pegfilgrastim in PDAC patients who did not experience FN during the first three courses of FOLFIRINOX, if the drug dose is reduced appropriately for neutropenia from the fourth course. Clinical trial information: UMIN000028055 .