In 1990, the United States and its military partners initiated a combined force against Iraq during Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm (ODS/DS). Shortly after the war, participating soldiers began to report high rates of chronic, unexplained illnesses that they believed might have been related to their service in the Persian Gulf.1-8 There has now been more than a decade of extensive public debate, congressional hearings, clinical evaluations, and research culminating in the expenditure of about $1 billion (US) (LTC James R Riddle, US Air Force, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Clinical and Program Policy, Pentagon, oral communication, January 13, 2000). In the aftermath of this impressive effort, however, nonbattle injury remains the only documented cause of increased postwar mortality among the soldiers who fought in ODS/DS.9-11 Even during this conflict, unintentional nonbattle injuries were a more common cause of death than battle-related injuries or illnesses.12,13 However, the etiology of this increased risk for injury fatality has not been evaluated, nor have effective intervention strategies been identified. Little information has been published regarding non-fatal injury among deployed veterans of ODS/DS. We do know that nonfatal unintentional injuries and musculoskeletal conditions (which are often related to “old” injuries) comprised the single greatest category of outpatient visits during the war, caused the most days lost from duty, and was the most common reason for evacuation from the Persian Gulf.13,14 A 1996 report found a slight, nonsignificant increase in the risk of hospitalization for postwar injury among deployed veterans compared with nondeployed veterans.15 A more recent study that links active-duty records to civilian and Department of Veterans Affairs data also suggests excess injury morbidity risk following deployment.16 Given that deployed veterans are at greater risk of fatal injury, injury morbidity would also likely be greater. But because few studies have investigated injury morbidity among ODS/DS veterans, we do not know how the frequency or severity of injuries differs for deployed US veterans. Even less is known about possible increases in injury morbidity among US military allied forces. The link between deployment to war zones and subsequent increases in nonbattle injuries is not unique to ODS/DS. Symptoms and health outcomes commonly reported by veterans of ODS/DS, including injuries, are similar to those reported by veterans of other conflicts.17 For example, US veterans of the Vietnam conflict also had greater risk for injuries resulting from motor-vehicle crashes, poisonings, fires and burns, homicide, and suicide after returning home.18-26 An Australian study found that injury accounted for 74% of the postwar mortality among their soldiers who served in Vietnam.27 As with ODS/DS, attention from the media, policy-makers, and researchers on the problems of Vietnam veterans focused almost exclusively on health outcomes other than the observed increased risk of injury mortality. Indeed, many of the mortality studies among Vietnam veterans were initiated in response to concerns from veterans about a possible relationship between exposure to herbicides and increases in cancer risk, and the excess risk of injury was found serendipitously.18-21,23,28