Risk Of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection Research Articles

Clinical relevance of the living kidney donor profile index in Korean kidney transplant recipients.

The Living Kidney Donor Profile Index (LKDPI) was developed in the United States to predict graft outcomes based on donor characteristics. However, there are significant differences in donor demographics, access to transplantation, proportion of ABO incompatibility, and posttransplant mortality in Asian countries compared with the United States. We evaluated the clinical relevance of the LKDPI score in a Korean kidney transplant cohort by analyzing 1860 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2000 and 2019. Patients were divided into three groups according to LKDPI score: <0, 1-19.9, and ≥20. During a median follow-up of 119months, 232 recipients (12.5%) experienced death-censored graft loss, and 98 recipients (5.3%) died. High LKDPI scores were significantly associated with increased risk of death-censored graft loss independent of recipient characteristics (LKDPI 1-19.9: HR 1.389, 95% CI 1.036-1.863; LKDPI ≥20: HR 2.121, 95% CI 1.50-2.998). High LKDPI score was also significantly associated with increased risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection and impaired graft renal function. By contrast, overall patient survival rates were comparable among the LKDPI groups. High LKDPI scores were associated with an increased risk of death-censored graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and impaired graft renal function among a Korean kidney transplant cohort.

Impact of Tacrolimus Daily Dose Limitation in Renal Transplant Recipients Expressing CYP3A5: A Retrospective Study.

The pharmacokinetic variability of tacrolimus can be partly explained by CYP3A5 activity. Our objective was to evaluate a tacrolimus sparing policy on renal graft outcome according to CYP3A5 6986A>G genetic polymorphism. This retrospective study included 1114 recipients with a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Genotyping of the 6986A>G allelic variant corresponding to CYP3A5*3 was systematically performed. One year after transplantation, tacrolimus blood trough concentration (C0) target range was 5–7 ng/mL. However, daily dose was capped to 0.10 mg/kg/day regardless of the CYP3A5 genotype. A total 208 CYP3A5*1/- patients were included. Despite a higher daily dose, CYP3A5*1/- recipients exhibited lower C0 during follow-up (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis did not show any significant influence of CYP3A5*1/- genotype (HR = 0.70, 0.46–1.07, p = 0.10) on patient-graft survival. Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) decline was significantly lower for the CYP3A5*1/- group (p = 0.02). The CYP3A5*1/- genotype did not significantly impact the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) (HR = 1.01, 0.68–1.49, p = 0.97) despite significantly lower C0. Based on our experience, a strategy of tacrolimus capping is associated with a better GFR evolution in CYP3A5*1/- recipients without any significant increase of BPAR incidence. Our study raised some issues about specific therapeutic tacrolimus C0 targets for CYP3A5*1/- patients and suggests to set up randomized control studies in this specific population.

COMPARISON OF SINGLE-DOSE VS DOUBLE DOSE ALEMTUZUMAB IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE

Introduction: Alemtuzumab is used as an induction agent at our centre for higher immunological risk kidney transplants. Aim of this study was to compare the effects of single-dose and two-dose Alemtuzumab on rejection and infection rates. Methods: Patients receiving Alemtuzumab between 1st April 2015 to 19th November 2018 were included. As per protocol, patients ≤ 60 years received two doses (Group 1) and ≥ 60 years received single-dose (Group 2) Alemtuzumab. The maintenance immunosuppression was similar in both groups (Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil). Primary endpoints were biopsy-proven rejection and infection rates (viral (CMV, BK and EBV) and urine infections) at one year. Descriptive statistics and parametric survival analysis (Weilberg distribution) to account for the reducing risk of rejection and infection overtime after transplant. Results: 231 Renal Transplant recipients received Alemtuzumab with 158 (68.4%) and 73 (31.6%) patients receiving double and single-dose, respectively. The mean age of recipients was 46.6 years (95% CI 45.2-47.9) and 66.9 years (95% CI 64.9-60.1) in Group 1 and 2 respectively. There was no difference in rejection rates between the two groups (Table 1). There was also no difference between the groups either with regards to infection rates (Table 1).Discussion: RCT comparing standard basiliximab-based treatment with alemtuzumab-based induction therapy followed by reduced CNI and mycophenolate exposure and steroid avoidance reduced the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection and infection in alemetuzumab group(1). However, there are no studies to compare the optimum dose of Alemetuzumab for induction. Hurst et al. concluded that in the elderly, alemtuzumab is associated with an escalating risk of death and graft loss in recipients of kidney transplantations (2).Considering the reduced immunity in elderly patients, high risk recipients (age>60years) receive single dose as a protocol at our centre. Our present study comparing single dose versus double dose Alemetuzumab showed similar biopsy proven rejection and infection among the groups. Conclusion: For patients requiring Alemtuzumab induction, due consideration should be given to switching to single-dose as the rejection and infection rates are comparable.

P1798MYCOPHENOLIC ACID TROUGH CONCENTRATION AND DOSE ARE ASSOCIATED WITH HEMATOLOGIC ABNORMALITIES BUT NOT REJECTION IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS

Abstract Background and Aims Little is known regarding the safe fixed dose of mycophenolic acid (MPA) for preventing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We investigated the correlation of MPA trough concentration (MPA C0) and dose with renal transplant outcomes and adverse events. Method This study included 79 consecutive KTRs who received MPA with tacrolimus (TAC) and corticosteroids. The MPA C0 of all the enrolled KTRs was measured, which was determined monthly by using particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay for 12 months, and clinical data were collected at each time point. The clinical endpoints included BPAR, any cytopenia, and BK or cytomegalovirus infections. Results No differences in MPA C0 and dose were observed between KTRs with or without BPAR or viral infections under statistically comparable TAC concentrations. MPA C0 was significantly higher in patients with leukopenia (P = 0.021) and anemia (P = 0.002) compared with those without cytopenia. The MPA dose was significantly higher in patients with thrombocytopenia (P = 0.002) compared with those without thrombocytopenia. MPA C0 ≥ 3.5 µg/mL was an independent risk factor for leukopenia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24–11.64, P = 0.019) and anemia (AOR 5.90, 95% CI 1.27–27.51, P = 0.024). An MPA dose greater than the mean value of 1188.8 mg/day was an independent risk factor for thrombocytopenia (AOR 3.83, 95% CI 1.15–12.78, P = 0.029). However, an MPA dose less than the mean value of 1137.3 mg/day did not increase the risk of BPAR. Conclusion Either a higher MPA C0 or dose was associated with an increased risk of cytopenia, but neither a lower MPA C0 nor dose was associated with BPAR within the first year of transplantation. Hence, a reduced MPA dose with TAC and corticosteroids might be safe in terms of reducing hematologic abnormalities without causing rejection.

Proton pump inhibitors and adverse effects in kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUNDThe adverse renal effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are increasingly recognized in both the general population and patients with chronic kidney disease. Several pharmacokinetic studies have also raised concerns regarding the interaction between PPIs and immunosuppressive drugs in transplant patients. Whether the adverse effects of PPIs have a clinical significance in kidney transplant recipients remains unclear. We performed this meta-analysis to assess the risk of adverse effects in kidney transplant recipients on PPI compared with those without PPI exposure.AIMTo investigate the risk of acute rejection, graft loss, hypomagnesemia, renal dysfunction, and overall mortality in kidney transplant recipients on PPI compared with those without PPI exposure.METHODSA systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception through October 2018 to identify studies that evaluated the adverse effects of PPIs in kidney transplant recipients, including biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, hypomagnesemia, renal function, and overall mortality. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. The protocol for this meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO, No. CRD42018115676.RESULTSFourteen observational studies with 6786 kidney transplant recipients were enrolled. No significant association was found between PPI exposure and the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection at ≥ 1 year [pooled odds ratio (OR), 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82-1.91, I2 = 55%], graft loss at 1 year (pooled OR = 1.30, 95%CI: 0.75-2.24, I2 = 0%) or 1-year mortality (pooled OR = 1.53, 95%CI: 0.90-2.58, I2 = 34%). However, PPI exposure was significantly associated with hypomagnesemia (pooled OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 1.19-2.05, I2 = 27%). Funnel plots and Egger regression asymmetry test were performed and showed no publication bias.CONCLUSIONPPI use was not associated with significant risks of higher acute rejection, graft loss, or 1-year mortality. However, the risk of hypomagnesemia was significantly increased with PPI use. Thus, future studies are needed to assess the impact of PPIs on long-term outcomes.

Effect of post-transplant glycemic control on long-term clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with diabetic nephropathy: A multicenter cohort study in Korea

PurposeDiabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end stage renal disease. The number of kidney transplantation (KT) due to diabetic nephropathy is increasing and there is debate on glycemic control after KT. In this study, we used a multi-center database to determine the relationship between post-transplant glycemic control and the outcomes of KT in patients with diabetic nephropathy.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with diabetic nephropathy from three tertiary hospitals to analyze the association between post-transplant glycemic control and the clinical outcomes of graft failure, including patient death and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). We assessed time-averaged glucose level and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) for 36 months after KT.ResultsAmong 3,538 KTRs, a total of 476 patients received kidney transplantation because of diabetic nephropathy. Mean time-averaged glucose and HbA1c levels were 147 ± 46 mg/dl and 7.7 ± 1.5%, respectively. Patients with diabetic nephropathy had poor graft and patient survival rate compared with non-diabetic nephropathy. Among KTRs with diabetic nephropathy, the highest quartile of time-averaged glucose was related to poor graft outcomes and the 3rd quartile of time-averaged HbA1c was associated with significantly better graft outcomes than the 1st, 2nd or 4th quartiles. There were no significant differences in the risk of BPAR across the 4 quartiles of glucose and HbA1c.ConclusionsStrict glycemic control before KT might not be related to successful outcomes but poor glycemic control after KT is associated with poor graft outcomes. There was no significant relationship between pre- or post-transplant glycemic control and BPAR.

Identifying risk profiles in liver transplant candidates and implications for induction immunosuppression.

Changes in recipient and donor characteristics are redefining the role of induction in liver transplant recipients. Older recipients are more common, with greater concomitant comorbidity. Moderate or severe renal dysfunction is now estimated to affect 40% of liver transplant recipients. Donors are also becoming older, and other factors such as more frequent non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) compromise the quality of some grafts. Rejection rates are now relatively low (~10%) but some patients have a markedly increased risk such as younger recipients and those undergoing re-transplantation. Induction immunosuppression is associated with a significant reduction in rejection risk but due to various factors universal induction is not justified. Steroid-free therapy without induction increases the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) but randomized trials have shown that induction with an interleukin-2 antagonist receptor (IL-2RA) agent or with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) maintains immunosuppressive efficacy in steroid-free regimens. Delayed calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) initiation (e.g. to days 4-5 post-transplant) can prevent deterioration of renal function during the first year post-transplant, but requires induction with an IL-2RA agent or rATG to maintain early immunosuppressive efficacy. IL-2RA induction may be inadequate to ensure a low risk of rejection in a steroid-free regimen combined with delayed tacrolimus. Randomized trials of CNI withdrawal at month 1 post-transplant have only achieved an acceptable rate of BPAR when induction is administered. In terms of safety, an increased rate of infection does not seem to be a concern. The most recent large-scale analyses have not indicated any evidence for an increased risk of malignancy, or specifically post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. In summary, the place of induction in the management of liver transplant patients is becoming established. Selective use in high-risk individuals to avoid graft rejection is still relevant, but the key rationale for induction is to facilitate steroid-sparing and CNI-sparing regimens to reduce long-term complications.

Delayed Initiation of Tacrolimus Is Safe and Effective in Renal Transplant Recipients With Delayed and Slow Graft Function

BackgroundTacrolimus is widely used in renal transplantation to help prevent acute and chronic rejection, but the nephrotoxicity of tacrolimus may compromise renal function. This study investigates the safety and efficacy in delayed initiation of tacrolimus after antilymphocyte induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients. MethodsThis retrospective cohort analysis involved data from 68 kidney transplant recipients receiving standard induction therapy (basiliximab [Simulect] or thymoglobulin) combined with tacrolimus. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the start time of tacrolimus therapy was before or after 24 hours posttransplantation. Acute rejection, common complications of immunosuppression, and graft survival were compared. ResultsThe mean (SD) timing of tacrolimus administered in the Delayed group was 4 (1.9) days after transplantation. The Delayed group patients had a higher percentage of slow graft function and delayed graft function than the No-delay group. Compared with the No-delay group, delayed initiation of tacrolimus did not increase risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection, infection, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, graft survival, and patient survival. ConclusionsOur study confirmed delayed initiation of tacrolimus after antilymphocyte induction therapy is safe and effective in renal transplant recipients with slow or delayed graft function.

Everolimus with early withdrawal or reduced‐dose calcineurin inhibitors improves renal function in liver transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are the mainstay of immunosuppression after liver transplantation (LT), but CNIs are associated with significant nephrotoxicity. Recently, mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus and everolimus (EVR) have been used with or without CNIs in LT recipients for their renal-sparing effect. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) that examined the effect of EVR with CNI minimization or withdrawal on renal function in LT recipients. RCT of primary adult LT recipients with baseline GFR >30mL/min who received EVR with CNI minimization or withdrawal were included. Four RCTs (EVR n=465, control n=428) were included. In three RCTs, EVR was initiated 4weeks following LT; these studies were used to assess the primary outcome. All four studies were used to assess the secondary outcomes. Based on this study, EVR use with CNI minimization in LT recipients is associated with improved renal function at 12months by GFR of 10.2mL/min (95% CI: 2.75-17.8). EVR use was not associated with an increased risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (RR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.31-1.46), graft loss (RR 1.60, 95% CI: 0.51-5.00), or mortality (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.62-2.90). However, it was associated with an increased risk of overall infections (RR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.10-1.91).

Alemtuzumab-based induction treatment versus basiliximab-based induction treatment in kidney transplantation (the 3C Study): a randomised trial

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) reduce short-term kidney transplant failure, but might contribute to transplant failure in the long-term. The role of alemtuzumab (a potent lymphocyte-depleting antibody) as an induction treatment followed by an early reduction in CNI and mycophenolate exposure and steroid avoidance, after kidney transplantation is uncertain. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab-based induction treatment compared with basiliximab-based induction treatment in patients receiving kidney transplants. For this randomised trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years and older who were scheduled to receive a kidney transplant in the next 24 h from 18 transplant centres in the UK. Using minimised randomisation, we randomly assigned patients (1:1; minimised for age, sex, and immunological risk) to either alemtuzumab-based induction treatment (ie, alemtuzumab followed by low-dose tacrolimus and mycophenolate without steroids) or basiliximab-based induction treatment (basiliximab followed by standard-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisolone). Participants were reviewed at discharge from hospital and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after transplantation. The primary outcome was biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months, analysed by intention to treat. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01120028, and isrctn.org, number ISRCTN88894088. Between Oct 4, 2010, and Jan 21, 2013, we randomly assigned 852 participants to treatment: 426 to alemtuzumab-based treatment and 426 to basiliximab-based treatment. Overall, individuals allocated to alemtuzumab-based treatment had a 58% proportional reduction in biopsy-proven acute rejection compared with those allocated to basiliximab-based treatment (31 [7%] patients in the alemtuzumab group vs 68 [16%] patients in the basiliximab group; hazard ratio (HR) 0·42, 95% CI 0·28-0·64; log-rank p<0·0001). We detected no between-group difference in treatment effect on transplant failure during the first 6 months (16 [4%] patients vs 13 [3%] patients; HR 1·23, 0·59-2·55; p=0·58) or serious infection (135 [32%] patients vs 136 [32%] patients; HR 1·02, 0·80-1·29; p=0·88). During the first 6 months after transplantation, 11 (3%) patients given alemtuzumab-based treatment and six (1%) patients given basiliximab-based treatment died (HR 1·79, 95% CI 0·66-4·83; p=0·25). Compared with standard basiliximab-based treatment, alemtuzumab-based induction therapy followed by reduced CNI and mycophenolate exposure and steroid avoidance reduced the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection in a broad range of patients receiving a kidney transplant. Long-term follow-up of this trial will assess whether these effects translate into differences in long-term transplant function and survival. UK National Health Service Blood and Transplant Research and Development Programme, Pfizer, and Novartis UK.

Does reduction in mycophenolic acid dose compromise efficacy regardless of tacrolimus exposure level? An analysis of prospective data from the Mycophenolic Renal Transplant (MORE) Registry

Prospective data are lacking concerning the effect of reduced mycophenolic acid (MPA) dosing on efficacy and the influence of concomitant tacrolimus exposure. The Mycophenolic Renal Transplant (MORE) Registry is a prospective, observational study of de novo kidney transplant patients receiving MPA therapy under routine management. The effect of MPA dose reduction, interruption, or discontinuation (dose changes) was assessed in 870 tacrolimus-treated patients: 375 (43.1%) reduced tacrolimus (≤7 ng/mL at baseline) and 495 (56.9%) standard tacrolimus (>7 ng/mL); enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium 589 (67.7%) and mycophenolate mofetil 281 (32.3%). During baseline to month 1, months 1–3, months 3–6, and months 6–12, 9.3% (78/838), 16.6% (132/794), 20.7% (145/701), and 13.1% (70/535) patients, respectively, required MPA dose changes. These patients experienced an increased risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection at one yr with tacrolimus exposure either included in the model (hazard ratio [HR] 2.60, 95% CI 1.28–5.29, p = 0.008) or excluded (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.28–5.23, p = 0.008). MPA dose changes were significantly associated with one yr graft failure when tacrolimus exposure was included (HR 2.23; 95% CI 1.01–4.89, p = 0.047) but not when tacrolimus exposure was excluded (HR 2.16; 95% CI 0.99–4.79; p = 0.054). These results suggest that reducing or discontinuing MPA can adversely affect graft outcomes regardless of tacrolimus trough levels.

Association between interleukin 23 receptor polymorphism and kidney transplant outcomes: A 10-year Taiwan cohort study

ObjectiveInterleukin 23 receptor (IL-23R) plays a role in the pathogenesis of multiple autoimmune processes. The relationship between allograft outcomes and the IL-23Rvariant genotypes has not been reported on previously. Therefore, we examined the relationship between this genetic polymorphism and kidney transplant outcomes. MethodsThis is an observational cohort study and 422 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) were enrolled. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism was used for the measurement of IL-23R genetic polymorphisms. We used a composite end-point incorporating serum creatinine (SCr) doubling, graft failure and death as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), biopsy-proven interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and individual primary outcome. The risks of developing primary and secondary outcomes were compared between the different IL-23R genotypes and alleles. ResultsWith a mean follow-up of 79.3±28.8months, 26 patients in the IL-23R genotype AA group and 32 patients in the IL-23R genotype AC/CC group reached the primary outcome (p=0.061). RTRs who carried the IL-23R AC/CC genotype (aHR 1.78; 95% CI. 1.01–3.12; p=0.046) and C allele (aHR 1.48; 95% CI. 0.96–2.28; p=0.075) had a higher risk of developing primary outcome as compared to those with IL-23R AA genotype and A allele, respectively. Moreover, RTRs who carried the IL-23R AC/CC genotype and C allele had a higher risk of developing biopsy-proven IF/TA (p=0.012; p=0.012) and SCr doubling (p=0.024; p=0.042) as compared to those with IL-23R AA genotype and A allele, respectively. The risk of BPAR, graft failure and death between the IL-23R genotypes and alleles were comparable. ConclusionIL-23R polymorphism may have a potential immuno-modulating role in long-term allograft outcome.

Biomarkers in transplantation: Prospective, blinded measurement of predictive value for the flow cytometry crossmatch after negative antiglobulin crossmatch in kidney transplantation

This prospective, blinded observational study was conducted to measure the predictive value the of flow cytometric crossmatch for biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death following kidney transplantation. Patients were selected for renal transplantation on the basis of a conventional antihuman globulin cytotoxic T-cell crossmatch. Flow crossmatch was performed simultaneously, but the results were not disclosed to the transplant team. A total of 257 kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in the study; 78 patients experienced biopsy-proven rejection in the first post-transplant year, and 41 patients lost their graft or died during the period of follow-up (mean: 2046 days). Kaplan-Meier estimates of rejection, graft loss, or patient death did not differ between subjects with a positive or negative flow crossmatch. Cox analyses showed no influence of the flow crossmatch on the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (P = 0.987). The sensitivity and specificity of the flow crossmatch for prediction of biopsy-proven rejection were 0.128 and 0.883, and the positive and negative post-test probabilities were 0.323 and 0.301, respectively. The magnitude of the channel shift did not influence the multivariate Cox regression model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the flow crossmatch was 0.483 (P = 0.71) and 0.572 (P = 0.38), respectively for the living and cadaver transplant recipients, indicating no discriminative value in this study population. Flow crossmatch appears to have no significant incremental value in predicting biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death following kidney transplantation in patients who have a negative antihuman globulin cytotoxic T-cell crossmatch against their donor.

Acute Rejection Risk in Kidney Transplant Recipients on Steroid-Avoidance Immunosuppression Receiving Induction With Either Antithymocyte Globulin or Basiliximab

Immunosuppression with rapid discontinuation of corticosteroids, usually with induction therapy, is safe in kidney transplant recipients. In 89 patients, we induced immunosuppression with basiliximab or rabbit antithymocyte globulin (17 and 72 patients, respectively). Selection criteria for basiliximab were age (≥65 years), history (malignancy; chronic infection), and type 1 diabetes mellitus (eligible for pancreas transplant). Steroids were administered through posttransplantation day 4 (five doses); maintenance immunosuppression was with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. At last follow-up (average, 286 days), most patients were steroid-free (antithymocyte globulin, 90%; basiliximab, 88%). Protocol biopsies were performed at 1, 4, and 12 months posttransplantation. The overall risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 12%. At 6 months posttransplantation, acute rejection-free survival was 93% for antithymocyte globulin, 65% for basiliximab ( P < .001). Median time to biopsy-proven acute rejection was 27 and 71 days, respectively. The low incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection with steroid-avoidance immunosuppression may be further reduced with antithymocyte globulin.

Adequate Early Cyclosporin Exposure is Critical to Prevent Renal Allograft Rejection: Patients Monitored by Absorption Profiling

This study used receiver operating characteristic analysis to investigate the properties of area under the concentration-time curve during the first 4h after cyclosporin-microemulsion dosing (AUC0-4) and cyclosporin (CyA) levels immediately before and at 2 and 3h after dosing (C0, C2 and C3) to predict the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) at 6 months. Ninety-eight kidney transplant recipients treated with CyA-microemulsion-based triple therapy immunosuppression were studied on post-transplant days 3, 5, and 7, and at increasing intervals thereafter. The most sensitive and specific predictor of AR was AUC0-4. Of the single time-point measurements, the measurement properties of C2 were closest to those of AUC0-4, and superior to those of C3. The relationship between C0 and subsequent AR was weak and did not reach statistical significance. On day 3, CyA AUC0-4 > or = 4,400 ng.h/mL and C2 > or = 1,700 ng/mL were each associated with a 92% negative predictive value for rejection in the first 6months. Pharmacokinetic measurements on or after day 5, and measurements on day 3 in patients with delayed graft function, were not predictive of AR. Adequate exposure within the first 3days post transplantation may be critically important in preventing subsequent rejection.