Risk Of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Therapy Research Articles

Deep embedded clustering of physical behaviour in patients with an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator identifies high and low risk profiles

Abstract Introduction Patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death are treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Patterns in physical behaviour may be prognostic for clinical deterioration. Deep embedded clustering (DEC) employs deep neural networks to learn compact and meaningful representations from high-dimensional data, on which an unsupervised clustering then operates. Purpose The objectives of this study were to use DEC to identify and describe behavioural profiles in a prospective ICD cohort and assess their risk of clinical outcomes. Methods Data from the multicenter, prospective SafeHeart study conducted at our 2 centers, was used. Patients received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) between May 2021 and September 2022, who then wore wearable devices during 6 months that capture physical behaviour. Latent representations were extracted from the time-series behavioural data using a variational autoencoder, and used as input to an unsupervised machine learning algorithm (Figure 1). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to visualise the annual risk of appropriate ICD-therapy, and the composite of all ICD-therapy and death. Results A total of 272 patients (mean age of 63.1 ±10.2 years, 81% male) were eligible, with a total of 37478 days of behavioural data (138 ±47 days per patient). DEC identified five distinct behavioural profiles: Cluster A (n=70) had high activity levels, mainly at light-to-moderate intensity. Cluster B (n=51) showed above-average sleep efficiency. Cluster C (n=63) exhibited a high-intensity activity profile. Cluster D (n=42) had frequent waking episodes and poor sleep. Cluster E (n=46) had very low physical activity levels and an impaired sleep architecture. Significantly differences were observed between clusters A-E in ICD-therapy and mortality (log-rank p-value 0.04) (Figure 2). Clusters B and D exhibited a threefold decrease in the annual risk of appropriate ICD therapy compared to cluster E. Conclusion DEC reveals distinct behavioural profiles in a prospective ICD cohort, with their inherent risk on outcomes. Wearable accelerometer devices enable behavioural monitoring that may provide opportunities for improved personalised risk prediction in a notoriously heterogeneous high-risk patient population.Deep embedded clustering of behaviourEvent rates stratified for clusters

Impact of preventive substrate catheter ablation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and infarct-related coronary chronic total occlusion.

Primary prevention patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and chronic total occlusion of an infarct-related coronary artery (CTO) are at a particularly high risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy occurrence. The trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of preventive CTO-related substrate ablation strategy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation. The PREVENTIVE VT study was a prospective, multicentre, randomized trial including ischaemic patients with ejection fraction ≤40%, no documented ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and evidence of scar related to the coronary CTO. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive substrate ablation before ICD implantation or standard therapy with ICD implantation only. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization for VAs. Secondary outcomes included the primary outcome's components, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Sixty patients were included in the study. During the mean follow-up of 44.7 ± 20.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (16.7%) patients undergoing preventive substrate ablation and in 13 (43.3%) patients receiving only ICD [hazard ratio (HR): 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12-0.94; P = 0.037]. Patients in the preventive ablation group also had fewer appropriate ICD therapies (P = 0.039) and the electrical storms (Log-rank: P = 0.01). While preventive ablation also reduced cardiac hospitalizations (P = 0.006), it had no significant impact on CV mortality (P = 0.151). Preventive ablation of the coronary CTO-related substrate in patients undergoing primary ICD implantation is associated with the reduced risk of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization due to VAs.

Association of QTc Interval and V4-S Wave With Appropriate ICD Therapy in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

BackgroundVentricular arrhythmias in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) may lead to sudden cardiac death (SCD). We aimed to investigate the relationship between electrocardiogram (ECG) indicators and the risk of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in HCM.MethodsThe HCM patients receiving ICD implantation were enrolled consecutively. QT interval correction (QTc) was calculated using Bazett's formula. Long or deep S wave in V4 lead was defined as duration time >50 ms and/or voltage amplitude >0.6 mV. The endpoint in our study was at least one ICD appropriate therapy triggered by ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), including anti-tachyarrhythmia pacing (ATP) and electrical shock.ResultsA total of 149 patients with HCM (mean age 53 ± 14 years, male 69.8%) were studied. Appropriate ICD therapies occurred in 47 patients (31.5%) during a median follow-up of 2.9 years. Cox regression analysis showed that long or deep S wave in V4 lead [hazard ratio (HR) 1.955, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.017–3.759, P = 0.045] and QTc interval (HR 1.014, 95% CI 1.008–1.021, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for appropriate ICD therapy. The ROC showed that the optimal cut-off point value for the QTc interval to predict the appropriate ICD therapy was 464 ms, and the AUC was 0.658 (95% CI 0.544–0.762, P = 0.002). The AUC for S wave anomalies in V4 lead was 0.608 (95% CI 0.511–0.706, P = 0.034). We developed a new model that combined the QTc interval and S wave anomalies in V4 lead based on four patient groups. Patients with QTc ≥464 ms and long or deep V4-S wave had the highest risk of developing appropriate ICD therapy (log-rank P < 0.0001). After adding QTc interval and V4-S wave anomalies into the HCM-risk-SCD model, the prediction effect of the new model was significantly improved, and the NRI was 0.302.ConclusionsIn this HCM cohort, QTc and S wave anomalies in V4 lead were found to be significant and strong predictors of the risk of appropriate ICD therapy. Patients with QTc ≥464 ms and long or deep S wave had the highest risk. After QTc interval and V4-S wave anomalies adding to the HCM-risk-SCD model, the prediction effect is significantly improved.

Impact of pulmonary valve replacement on ventricular arrhythmias in patients with tetralogy of Fallot

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): INSERM - French Society of Cardiology OnBehalf DAIT4F Investigators Background Sudden cardiac death is a major cause of death in tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and right ventricular overload is commonly considered as a potential trigger for ventricular arrhythmias. Purpose We aimed to assess the impact of pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) on ventricular arrhythmias burden using a population of TOF patients with continuous cardiac monitoring by implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Methods Nationwide French registry including all TOF patients with an ICD. Survival data with recurrent events were used to compare the burden of appropriate ICD therapies before and after PVR in patients who underwent PVR over the study period. Results A total of 165 patients (mean age 42.2 ± 13.3 years, 70.1% males) were included from 40 centers. Over a median (IQR) follow-up period of 6.8 (2.5-11.4) years, 26 (15.8%) patients underwent PVR. Among those patients, 18 (69.2%) experienced at least one appropriate ICD therapy. When considering all ICD therapies delivered before (n = 62) and after (n = 16) PVR, the burden of ICD appropriate therapies was significantly lower after PVR (HR 0.21, 95%CI 0.08-0.56, p = 0.002). In the overall cohort, PVR before ICD implantation was also independently associated with a lower risk of appropriate ICD therapy in primary prevention patients (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.10-0.89, p = 0.031). Conclusions In this cohort of high-risk TOF patients implanted with an ICD, the burden of appropriate ICD therapies was significantly reduced after PVR. While optimal indications and timing for PVR are debated, these findings suggest the importance of considering ventricular arrhythmias in the overall making-decision process. Abstract Figure.

Ongoing Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias and All-Cause Mortality at Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Generator Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

[Figure: see text].

Long-Term Outcomes Among a Nationwide Cohort of Patients Using an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: UMBRELLA Study Final Results.

BackgroundLarge‐scale studies describing modern populations using an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) are lacking. We aimed to analyze the incidence of arrhythmia, device interventions, and mortality in a broad spectrum of real‐world ICD patients with different heart disorders.Methods and ResultsThe UMBRELLA study is a prospective, multicenter, nationwide study of contemporary patients using an ICD followed up by remote monitoring, with a blinded review of arrhythmic episodes. From November 2005 to November 2017, 4296 patients were followed up. After 46.6±27.3 months, 16 067 episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmia occurred in 1344 patients (31.3%). Appropriate ICD therapy occurred in 27.3% of study population. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.51; 95% CI, 1.29–1.78), dilated cardiomyopathy (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07–1.53), and valvular heart disease (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.43–2.62) exhibited a higher risk of appropriate ICD therapies, whereas patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54–0.96) and Brugada syndrome (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14–0.45) showed a lower risk. All‐cause death was 13.4% at follow‐up. Ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.58–5.90), dilated cardiomyopathy (HR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.18–5.10), and valvular heart disease (HR, 3.97; 95% CI, 2.25–6.99) had the worst prognoses. Delayed high‐rate detection was enabled in 39.7% of patients, and single‐zone programming occurred in 52.6% of primary prevention patients. Both parameters correlated with lower risk of first appropriate ICD therapy, with no excess risk of mortality. The rate of inappropriate shocks at follow‐up was low (6%) and did not differ among type of ICD but was lower in SmartShock‐capable devices.ConclusionsIrrespective of the cause, contemporary ICD patients with heart failure–related disorders had a similar risk of ICD life‐saving interventions and death. Current ICD programming recommendations still need to be implemented.RegistrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NTC01561144.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of arrhythmia during follow-up of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.

The current knowledge of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is limited. We aimed to investigate the nature of IVF, including clinical assessment and later diagnosis, and risk factors of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in the follow-up period. Between 2007 and 2019 we systematically identified all patients from Rigshospitalet, Denmark, with a resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) with no identifiable cause. All patients were followed routinely in the ICD outpatient clinic and the majority also in an inherited heart disease outpatient clinic. Outcomes were analysed with Cox regressions models and cumulative incidence curves. We identified 84 patients with an initial diagnosis of IVF; of these, three (3.6%) patients were later diagnosed with a cardiac disease. The remaining IVF patients (n = 81, median age 45 years; men 71.6%) were followed a median follow-up of 5.2 years (interquartile range, 2.0-7.6). A total of 24 (29.6%) patients had appropriate ICD therapy and 12 (14.8%) patients had inappropriate ICD therapy. No predominant type of ventricular arrhythmia at first appropriate ICD therapy was observed. Early repolarization at baseline was not associated with an increased risk of appropriate ICD therapy (P = .842). Repeated cardiac arrest at index SCA increased the risk of appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio, 2.63 [95% CI, 1.08-6.40; P = .033]). Most patients remained idiopathic throughout the follow-up period and the overall long-term prognosis of IVF was good. Repeated cardiac arrest at index SCA was a risk factor of appropriate ICD therapy and early repolarization was not associated with an increased risk of appropriate ICD therapy.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming after first occurrence of ventricular tachycardia in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT).

BackgroundImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) programming to novel settings can reduce the risk of inappropriate therapies.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of novel ICD programming after the first occurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT).MethodsIn MADIT-RIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Reduce Inappropriate Therapy) patients who experienced a first occurrence of VT, the risk of subsequent inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapies and adverse cardiovascular events by ICD programming to Arm A (conventional: VT ≥170 bpm), Arm B (high rate: VT ≥200 bpm), or Arm C (duration delay: ≥60-second delay before therapy ≥170 bpm) was determined.ResultsAmong 205 patients, ICD programming changes were made in 30 patients (15%) after they experienced a VT episode; 117 patients (57%) were programmed to Arm A settings and 88 patients (43%) to Arm B/C settings. At 15-month follow-up, the cumulative probability of inappropriate ICD therapy was significantly lower in Arm B/C compared to Arm A (9% vs 20%; log-rank P = .029 for overall difference). The rate of appropriate ICD therapy also was significantly lower in Arm B/C compared to Arm A (32% vs 64%; log-rank P = .001 for overall difference). Multivariate analysis showed that patients programmed to Arm B/C after the occurrence of VT had a 71% reduction (P = .02) in the risk of inappropriate ICD therapies and a 43% reduction (P = .02) in the risk of appropriate ICD therapies compared to Arm A.ConclusionThe benefit of high-rate cutoff or duration delay settings in patients with an ICD is maintained after the first occurrence of VT.

Characterization of the left ventricular arrhythmogenic substrate with multimodality imaging: role of innervation imaging and left ventricular global longitudinal strain

BackgroundEven though implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary prevention has shown to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in chronic heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a significant portion of these patients will never receive appropriate ICD therapy. We aimed to functionally characterize the arrhythmogenic substrate using left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) and heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) ratio on 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) scintigraphy.MethodsWe included patients with heart failure with reduced LVEF who received an ICD for primary prevention. To functionally characterize the arrhythmogenic substrate, we measured the LV GLS with two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography and cardiac innervation measured as the H/M ratio on 123I-MIBG scintigraphy. An event was defined as appropriate ICD therapy.ResultsA total of 155 patients were included, 74% were male and the mean age was 72 ± 9 years. During a median follow-up of 10 (6–12) years, 43 patients (28%) experienced appropriate ICD therapy. Patients that experienced an event were more often male, had more often ischaemic cardiomyopathy and were more likely to have worse renal function. There was no difference in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between the two groups (25 ± 6.4% vs 26 ± 6.0%, p = 0.276). However, LV GLS was significantly more impaired in the group that experienced an event compared to patients that did not (− 6.7 ± 2.1% vs − 7.6 ± 2.1%; p = 0.020). The innervation, measured as the H/M ratio on 123I-MIBG scintigraphy was also significantly more impaired in the patients that experienced and event compared to patients that did not (1.34 ± 0.2 vs 1.47 ± 0.2, p ≤ 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed LV GLS and H/M ratio independently associated with appropriate ICD therapy with a hazard ratio of 1.24 (95% CI 1.027–1.491, p = 0.025) and 5.71 (95% CI 1.135–28.571, p = 0.034), respectively. LV GLS and H/M ratio were significantly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient − 0.30, p < 0.001).ConclusionsFunctionally characterizing the arrhythmogenic substrate using different imaging techniques defines the risk for appropriate ICD therapy, whereas LVEF did not.

Arrhythmic burden among asymptomatic patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

The clinical benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in asymptomatic patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class I) with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction is continually disputed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, mortality rates, and appropriate device therapies by NYHA class in a prospective national ICD registry. The study comprised 1670 consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who were implanted with a primary prevention ICD and enrolled in the prospective national Israeli ICD Registry from 2010. The risk for clinical and arrhythmic events was assessed by NYHA class. Asymptomatic patients (NYHA I) composed 19% of the study cohort. Comparison according to NYHA class showed that the highest mortality rate was in the NYHA III-IV group vs NYHA I and NYHA II (10.5% vs 5.4% and 5.8%, respectively; log rank P= .003). Conversely, cumulative incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, corrected for death as a competing risk, were higher among patients with NYHA I (11% vs 7%; P = .021). In a multivariate model, NYHA I vs ≥II remained independently associated with a significant 2-fold risk for appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio 2.03; 95% confidence interval 1.28-3.24). Our findings indicate that patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy without heart failure symptoms have a higher risk of appropriate ICD therapy compared with symptomatic patients after adjustment for the competing risk of death, suggesting possible incremental benefit of primary ICD implantation in this population.

Association of cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived circumferential strain parameters with the risk of ventricular arrhythmia and all-cause mortality in patients with prior myocardial infarction and primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator

BackgroundImpaired left ventricular (LV) contraction and relaxation may further promote adverse remodeling and may increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in ischemic cardiomyopathy. We aimed to examine the association of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived circumferential strain parameters for LV regional systolic function, LV diastolic function and mechanical dispersion with the risk of VA in patients with prior myocardial infarction and primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).MethodsPatients with an ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent CMR prior to primary prevention ICD implantation, were retrospectively identified. LV segmental circumferential strain curves were extracted from short-axis cine CMR. For LV regional strain analysis, the extent of moderately and severely impaired strain (percentage of LV segments with strain between − 10% and − 5% and > − 5%, respectively) were calculated. LV diastolic function was quantified by the early and late diastolic strain rate. Mechanical dispersion was defined as the standard deviation in delay time between each strain curve and the patient-specific reference curve. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR) (95%CI) were calculated to assess the association between LV strain parameters and appropriate ICD therapy.ResultsA total of 121 patients (63 ± 11 years, 84% men, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 27 ± 9%) were included. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 47 (27;69) months, 30 (25%) patients received appropriate ICD therapy. The late diastolic strain rate (HR 1.1 (1.0;1.2) per − 0.25 1/s, P = 0.043) and the extent of moderately impaired strain (HR 1.5 (1.0;2.2) per + 10%, P = 0.048) but not the extent of severely impaired strain (HR 0.9 (0.6;1.4) per + 10%, P = 0.685) were associated with appropriate ICD therapy, independent of LVEF, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) scar border size and acute revascularization. Mechanical dispersion was not related to appropriate ICD therapy (HR 1.1 (0.8;1.6) per + 25 ms, P = 0.464).ConclusionsIn an ischemic cardiomyopathy population referred for primary prevention ICD implantation, the extent of moderately impaired strain and late diastolic strain rate were associated with the risk of appropriate ICD therapy, independent of LVEF, scar border size and acute revascularization. These findings suggest that disturbed LV contraction and relaxation may contribute to an increased risk of VA after myocardial infarction.

Sex Differences in Cardiac Arrhythmias: Clinical and Research Implications.

Sex differences have the potential to impact diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in a wide variety of medical conditions, and cardiac arrhythmias are no exception.1 Studies evaluating pathophysiology, disease course, and therapeutic options for cardiac arrhythmias have been performed predominantly in male patients. However, catheter and device-based therapies coupled with landmark clinical trials have contributed to an improved understanding of this important aspect. The objective of this review is to present the current state of knowledge on sex differences in cardiac arrhythmias with a focus on clinical management, while highlighting gaps in knowledge that would benefit from future investigation. ### Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter #### Disease Burden Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are the most commonly encountered tachyarrhythmias in clinical practice, with significant implications for public health and healthcare costs. Stroke, hospitalization, and loss of productivity are the major consequences of AF.2 The incidence of AF (per 1000 person-years) is reported to be between 1.6 and 2.7 in women and between 3.8 and 4.7 in men.2 The age-adjusted incidence and prevalence of AF is lower in women compared with that in men, and accordingly, the lifetime risk of AF from the Framingham Heart Study at 40 years of age was higher in men (26.0% for men versus 23.0% for women).3 Another analysis from the Framingham Heart Study demonstrated no significant sex differences in the risk of developing AFL.4 The prevalence of AF continues to rise among both men and women. In a study investigating the global burden of disease from 1980 to 2010, there was not only an increase in overall burden, incidence, and prevalence of AF, but most importantly an increase in AF-associated mortality in both men and women (Figure 1).5 The age-adjusted mortality for women was consistently higher compared with that for men from 1990 to 2010 (Figure …

Chronic total occlusion in an infarct-related coronary artery and the risk of appropriate ICD therapies.

Risk stratification for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy needs to be improved. Coronary chronic total occlusions in an infarct-related artery (IRA-CTOs) have been associated with an increased arrhythmic risk. This study aimed to evaluate the association between IRA-CTOs and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Observational cohort study that included 342 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, an ICD implanted for primary or secondary prevention, and a coronary angiography performed shortly before ICD implantation. The ICD was implanted for primary prevention in 163 patients (48%). IRA-CTO was found in 161 patients (47%). During a median follow-up of 33months, 41% of patients experienced at least one appropriate ICD therapy. Patients with IRA-CTO had higher proportions of appropriate ICD therapies (57%vs. 26%, P < 0.001) and appropriate ICD shocks (40%vs. 17%, P < 0.001). At multivariate Cox regression, IRA-CTO was the only variable that consistently resulted as independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies and shocks both in the global population of the study (HR 2.3, P < 0.001 and HR 3, P < 0.001, respectively) and when analyzing separately patients with primary or secondary prevention ICD. IRA-CTO is an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies, including appropriate ICD shocks. This association is consistent across all the subgroups analyzed. Patients with IRA-CTO have a very high risk of appropriate ICD therapies. These findings may help improving risk stratification as well as the management of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Effect of Sleep-Disordered Breathing on Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction are at increased risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is recommended to prevent sudden cardiac death in some of these patients. Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in this population and may impact arrhythmogenicity. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies that assessed the impact of SDB on ICD therapy. Relevant prospective studies were identified in the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. Weighted risk ratios of the association between SDB and appropriate ICD therapies were estimated using random effects meta-analysis. Nine prospective cohort studies (n=1274) were included in this analysis. SDB was present in 52% of the participants. SDB was associated with a 55% higher risk of appropriate ICD therapies (45% versus 28%; risk ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-1.83). In a subgroup analysis based on the subtypes of SDB, the risk was higher in both central (risk ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.02) and obstructive (risk ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.03) sleep apnea. SDB is associated with an increased risk of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

The impact of co-morbidity burden on appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy and all-cause mortality: insight from Danish nationwide clinical registers.

In a nationwide cohort of primary (PP-ICD) and secondary prevention (SP-ICD) implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients, we aimed to investigate the association between co-morbidity burden and risk of appropriate ICD therapy and mortality. We identified all patients >18 years, implanted with first-time PP-ICD (n = 1873) or SP-ICD (n = 2461) in Denmark from 2007 to 2012. Co-morbidity was identified in administrative registers of hospitalization and drug prescription from pharmacies. Co-morbidity burden was defined as the number of pre-existing non-ICD indication-related co-morbidities including atrial fibrillation, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic renal disease, liver disease, cancer, chronic psychiatric disease, and peripheral and/or cerebrovascular disease, and divided into four groups (co-morbidity burden 0, 1, 2, and ≥3). Through Cox models, we assessed the impact of co-morbidity burden on appropriate ICD therapy and mortality. Increasing co-morbidity burden was not associated with increased risk of appropriate therapy, irrespective of implant indication [all hazard ratios (HRs) 1.0-1.4, P = NS]. Using no co-morbidities as reference, increasing co-morbidity burden was associated with increased mortality risk in PP-ICD patients (co-morbidity burden 1, HR 2.1; comorbidity burden 2, HR 3.7; co-morbidity burden ≥3, HR 6.6) (all P < 0.001) and SP-ICD patients (co-morbidity burden 1, HR 2.2; co-morbidity burden 2, HR 3.8; co-morbidity burden ≥3, HR 5.8). With increasing co-morbidity burden, an increasing frequency of patients died without having utilized their device, with 72% PP-ICD and 45% SP-ICD patients with co-morbidity burden ≥3 dying without prior appropriate ICD therapy. Increasing co-morbidity burden was not associated with increased risk of appropriate ICD therapy. With increasing co-morbidity burden, mortality increased, and a higher proportion of patients died, without ever having utilized their device.

Left ventricular geometry predicts ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

BackgroundMost patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation fail to utilize the device resulting in increasing societal costs and patient exposure to device morbidity. We sought to determine whether volumetric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) left ventricular (LV) spherical remodeling predicts future ventricular arrhythmias in primary ICD patients with reduced LV ejection fraction (EF).MethodsSixty-eight consecutive patients with transthoracic echocardiographic LVEF <35% referred for CMR prior to ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden death were identified. Sphericity index was measured as the ratio of LV end-diastolic volume (from cine short axis stack) to the volume of a sphere with a LV end-diastolic 4-chamber length diameter.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range; 28–88), 15 patients (22%) received appropriate ICD therapy. Multivariable Cox’s proportional hazard modeling identified increased CMR-derived sphericity index as the strongest independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.16; p = 0.007). In addition, dichotomized volumetric CMR-derived sphericity index ≥0.57 carried a 4-fold hazard risk for appropriate ICD therapy, controlling for age and LVEF (HR, 4.49; 95% CI, 1.53 to 13.21; p = 0.006). When sphericity index, LVEF and mass index were used in combination, important incremental prognostic information was achieved (net reclassification improvement, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.77).ConclusionsThe combined assessment of LV geometry, mass index and systolic function may provide incremental prognostic information regarding ventricular arrhythmia requiring appropriate ICD therapy in primary prevention patients with reduced LVEF.

Long-Term Echocardiographic Outcome in Super-Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and the Association With Mortality and Defibrillator Therapy

Super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with significant left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and improved clinical outcome. The study aimed to: (1) evaluate whether LV reverse remodeling remains sustained during long-term follow-up in super-responders and (2) analyze the association between the course of LV reverse remodeling and ventricular arrhythmias. Of all, primary prevention super-responders to CRT were selected. Super-response was defined as LV end-systolic volume reduction of ≥30% 6months after device implantation. Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the association of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) as time-dependent variable with implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy and mortality. A total of 171 super-responders to CRT-defibrillator were included (mean age 67 ± 9years; 66% men; 37% ischemic heart disease). Here of 129 patients received at least 1 echocardiographic evaluation after a median follow-up of 62months (25th to 75th percentile, 38 to 87). LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, and LVEF after 6-month follow-up were comparable with those after 62-month follow-up (p= 0.90, p= 0.37, and p= 0.55, respectively). Changes in LVEF during follow-up in super-responders were independently associated with appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.98; p= 0.005) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.00; p= 0.04). A 5% increase in LVEF was associated with a 1.37 times lower risk of appropriate ICD therapy and a 1.30 times lower risk of mortality. In conclusion, LV reverse remodeling in super-responders to CRT remains sustained during long-term follow-up. Changes in LVEF during follow-up were associated with mortality and ICD therapy.

The risk of ventricular arrhythmias in a Dutch CRT population: CRT-defibrillator versus CRT-pacemaker.

BackgroundPatients eligible for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) have an indication for primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. However, response to CRT might influence processes involved in arrhythmogenesis and therefore change the necessity of ICD therapy in certain patients.MethodIn 202 CRT-defibrillator patients, the association between baseline variables, 6-month echocardiographic outcome (volume response: left ventricular end-systolic volume decrease < ≥15 % and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ >35 %) and the risk of first appropriate ICD therapy was analysed retrospectively.ResultsFifty (25 %) patients received appropriate ICD therapy during a median follow-up of 37 (23–52) months. At baseline ischaemic cardiomyopathy (hazard ratio (HR) 2.0, p = 0.019) and a B-type natriuretic peptide level > 163 pmol/l (HR 3.8, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the risk of appropriate ICD therapy. After 6 months, 105 (52 %) patients showed volume response and 51 (25 %) reached an LVEF > 35 %. Three (6 %) patients with an LVEF > 35 % received appropriate ICD therapy following echocardiography at ± 6 months compared with 43 patients (29 %) with an LVEF ≤ 35 % (p = 0.001). LVEF post-CRT was more strongly associated to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias than volume response (LVEF > 35 %, HR 0.23, p = 0.020).ConclusionAssessing the necessity of an ICD in patients eligible for CRT remains a challenge. Six months post-CRT an LVEF > 35 % identified patients at low risk of ventricular arrhythmias. LVEF might be used at the time of generator replacement to identify patients suitable for downgrading to a CRT-pacemaker.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator elective generator replacement: a procedure for all?

Six risk stratification scores have been developed to estimate mortality risk in patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study aims at validating and comparing these risk scores in patients having elective ICD generator replacement (GR) and assessing the outcome of patients submitted to this procedure. Two hundred twenty three consecutive patients with ischaemic or non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy submitted to elective ICD GR and followed-up for 44 ± 19 months were included. We evaluated which of six previously developed risk scores could predict post-discharge all-cause mortality risk in this context with the highest efficacy. Comparisons between these scores were made using receiver-operating characteristic curves and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index. We further assessed risk of appropriate ICD therapies and all-cause mortality following ICD GR. The prognostic utility of the six scores was assessed by calculating the AUC for follow-up all-cause mortality prediction: Goldenberg - 0.758 ± 0.042, p < 0.001; Parkash - 0.754 ± 0.042, p < 0.001; Bilchick - 0.813 ± 0.038, p < 0.001; Kraaier - 0.721 ± 0.043, p < 0.001; REPLACE DARE - 0.746 ± 0.048, p < 0.001; Providencia - 0.739 ± 0.043, p < 0.001. Through measures of risk reclassification (IDI and relative IDI), the score by Bilchick et al. was shown to outperform all other scores. Binary logistic regression identified pre-GR-appropriate ICD therapy as an independent predictor of post-GR ICD therapy (OR 6.2, CI 95% 3.0-12.7, p < 0.001), along with male gender (OR 6.6, CI 95% 0.8-55, p = 0.082) and history of atrial fibrillation (OR 2.28, CI 95% 1.1-4.5, p = 0.019). Current prediction scores are useful in predicting mortality risk of patients considered for ICD generator replacement and can potentially help identify patients who may not benefit from continuous ICD treatment due to high mortality rates regardless of the ICD.

Association Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Post-Cardiac Resynchronization Treatment and Subsequent Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy for Sustained Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), it is not known whether a specific level of improvement will predict future implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) was implanted in 423 patients at 1 institution between October 2, 2001 and January 19, 2007. A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between post-CRT-D LVEF and ICD therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A landmark population of 270 patients, with post-CRT-D LVEF measured and no ICD therapy within 1 year of device implantation, was followed for subsequent outcomes. Of these, 22 patients (8.2%) had subsequent appropriate ICD therapy over a median follow-up of 1.5 years. The estimated 2-year risk of appropriate ICD therapy is 3.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0%-6.3%), 2.1% (95% CI, 0%-5.0%), and 1.5% (95% CI, 0%-3.9%) for post-CRT-D LVEF of 45%, 50%, and 55%, respectively. In patients with a primary prevention indication for CRT-D, the estimated 2-year risk is 3.3% (95% CI, 0%-7.3%), 2.5% (95% CI, 0%-6.1%), and 1.9% (95% CI, 0%-5.1%) for post-CRT-D LVEF of 45%, 50%, and 55%, respectively. When a CRT responder demonstrates near normalization in LVEF to ≥45%, the incidence of ICD therapy for ventricular arrhythmias becomes low. Future studies are needed to determine whether an ICD is still needed in some of these patients at the time of generator replacement.